I have 3 threads
1st printing A
2nd printing B
3rd printing C
I want to print in sequence A B C A B C A B C and so on.....
So I wrote the program below, but I am not able to achieve the same.
I am aware of the problem that when status=1 at that time say for example B1 and C1 thread are waiting and when I do notifyAll() both waiting thread wake up and depending on CPU allocation it might print B or C.
in this case I want only B to be printed after A.
what modification I need to do.
public class NotifyAllExample {
int status=1;
public static void main(String[] args) {
NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample = new NotifyAllExample();
A1 a=new A1(notifyAllExample);
B1 b=new B1(notifyAllExample);
C1 c=new C1(notifyAllExample);
a.start();
b.start();
c.start();
}
}
class A1 extends Thread{
NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample;
A1(NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample){
this.notifyAllExample = notifyAllExample;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try{
synchronized (notifyAllExample) {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
if(notifyAllExample.status!=1){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
System.out.print("A ");
notifyAllExample.status = 2;
notifyAllExample.notifyAll();
}
}
}catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception 1 :"+e.getMessage());
}
}
}
class B1 extends Thread{
NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample;
B1(NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample){
this.notifyAllExample = notifyAllExample;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try{
synchronized (notifyAllExample) {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
if(notifyAllExample.status!=2){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
System.out.print("B ");
notifyAllExample.status = 3;
notifyAllExample.notifyAll();
}
}
}catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception 2 :"+e.getMessage());
}
}
}
class C1 extends Thread{
NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample;
C1(NotifyAllExample notifyAllExample){
this.notifyAllExample = notifyAllExample;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try{
synchronized (notifyAllExample) {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
if(notifyAllExample.status!=3){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
System.out.print("C ");
notifyAllExample.status = 1;
notifyAllExample.notifyAll();
}
}
}catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception 3 :"+e.getMessage());
}
}
}
Convert those IF statements to WHILE statements to get the desired behavior:
if (notifyAllExample.status != 2){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
to
while (notifyAllExample.status != 2){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
This will ensure that if a thread is notified, it won't go out of the while loop until the status value is what it expects.
Also, mark status as volatile so that the threads won't have a local copy.
public class RunThreadsInOrder implements Runnable {
static int numThread = 1;
static int threadAllowedToRun = 1;
int myThreadID;
private static Object myLock = new Object();
public RunThreadsInOrder() {
this.myThreadID = numThread++;
System.out.println("Thread ID:" + myThreadID);
}
#Override
public void run() {
synchronized (myLock) {
while (myThreadID != threadAllowedToRun) {
try {
myLock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
} catch (Exception e) {}
}
try {
Thread.sleep(2000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
System.out.println("myThreadID is running: " + myThreadID);
myLock.notifyAll();
threadAllowedToRun++;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
Thread t1 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
Thread t2 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
Thread t3 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
Thread t4 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
Thread t5 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
Thread t6 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
Thread t7 = new Thread(new RunThreadsInOrder());
t7.start();
t6.start();
t5.start();
t4.start();
t3.start();
t2.start();
t1.start();
}
}
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException{
Thread t1 = new Thread(new A(), "1");
Thread t2 = new Thread(new A(), "2");
Thread t3 = new Thread(new A(), "3");
t1.start();
try{
t1.join();
}catch (Exception e){
}
t2.start();
try{
t2.join();
}catch (Exception e){
}
t3.start();
try{
t3.join();
}catch (Exception e){
}
}
}
class A implements Runnable{
public void run(){
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName());
}
}
or you can use Executor Framework
public class Sequence {
int valve = 1;
public static void main(String[] args){
Sequence s = new Sequence();
ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
List<Runnable> rList = new ArrayList<>();
rList.add(new A(s));
rList.add(new B(s));
rList.add(new C(s));
for(int i = 0; i < rList.size(); i++){
es.submit(rList.get(i));
}
es.shutdown();
}
}
class A implements Runnable{
Sequence s;
A(Sequence s){
this.s = s;
}
public void run(){
synchronized (s) {
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
while (s.valve != 1) {
try {
s.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println("A");
s.valve = 2;
s.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
class B implements Runnable{
Sequence s;
B(Sequence s){
this.s = s;
}
public void run() {
synchronized (s) {
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
while (s.valve != 2) {
try {
s.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println("B");
s.valve = 3;
s.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
class C implements Runnable{
Sequence s;
C(Sequence s){
this.s = s;
}
public void run() {
synchronized (s) {
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
while (s.valve != 3) {
try {
s.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println("C");
s.valve = 1;
s.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
In the first case the join for each thread causes the threads to wait for one another. In the second case a list stores the threads and executor executes them one after another creating 3 threads
Another way to do this is where only one runnable class is present and communication between thread is done via static variable in the main class and a variable in the runnable class
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class Seq {
int i = 1;
public static void main(String[] args){
Seq s = new Seq();
Common c1 = new Common(s, 1);
Common c2 = new Common(s, 2);
Common c3 = new Common(s, 3);
List<Runnable> l = new ArrayList<>();
l.add(c1);
l.add(c2);
l.add(c3);
ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
for(int i = 0; i < 3; i++){
es.submit(l.get(i));
}
es.shutdown();
}
}
class Common implements Runnable{
Seq s;
int o;
Common(Seq s, int o){
this.s = s;
this.o = o;
}
public void run(){
synchronized (s) {
for (int z = 0; z < 100; z++) {
if(s.i > 3)
s.i = 1;
while (s.i != o) {
try {
s.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println(o);
s.i++;
s.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
I was asked to write a similar program in an interview with the added condition that it should be extensible in a way that we can provide our own count of threads and they should print characters with the first thread printing 'A' and then the subsequent threads printing B, C, D and so on. Here's how I did it.
public class AlternateCharPrinter {
public static char ch = 65;
private static void createAndStartThreads(int count) {
Object lock = new Object();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
new Thread(new AlternateCharRunner((char) (65 + i), lock)).start();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
createAndStartThreads(4);
}
}
class AlternateCharRunner implements Runnable {
private char ch;
private Object lock;
private static int runnerCount;
public AlternateCharRunner(char ch, Object lock) {
this.ch = ch;
this.lock = lock;
runnerCount++;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
synchronized (lock) {
while (ch != AlternateCharPrinter.ch) {
try {
lock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println(AlternateCharPrinter.ch++);
if (AlternateCharPrinter.ch == (65 + runnerCount)) {
AlternateCharPrinter.ch = 65;
}
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
You need to replace
if (notifyAllExample.status!=1)
with
while (notifyAllExample.status!=1)
and same thing in the other 2 classes. If not, then as soon as the wait exits the thread continues without knowing if it is its turn.
Replace:
if(notifyAllExample.status!=1){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
with:
while(notifyAllExample.status!=1){
notifyAllExample.wait();
}
in all classes accordingly.
The simplest solution to solve this can be following way:
public class PrintInOrder implements Runnable {
private int valueToPrint;
private int id;
private static int turn = 1;
private static int RESET_TURN_THRESHOLD = 3;
public PrintInOrder() {
this.valueToPrint = -1;
}
public PrintInOrder(int id, int val) {
this.id = id;
this.valueToPrint = val;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while(true) {
if (turn == this.id) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + "::::" + valueToPrint);
turn++;
}
if (turn > RESET_TURN_THRESHOLD) {
turn = 1;
}
}
}
public static void main(String []args) {
Thread t1 = new Thread(new PrintInOrder(1, 1));
t1.setName("THREAD-1");
t1.start();
Thread t2 = new Thread(new PrintInOrder(2, 2));
t2.setName("THREAD-2");
t2.start();
Thread t3 = new Thread(new PrintInOrder(3, 3));
t3.setName("THREAD-3");
t3.start();
}
}
/*
OUTPUT::::
THREAD-1::::1
THREAD-2::::2
THREAD-3::::3
THREAD-1::::1
THREAD-2::::2
THREAD-3::::3
THREAD-1::::1
THREAD-2::::2
THREAD-3::::3
THREAD-1::::1
THREAD-2::::2
THREAD-3::::3
THREAD-1::::1
THREAD-2::::2
THREAD-3::::3
THREAD-1::::1
THREAD-2::::2
THREAD-3::::3
...
*/
Here is my solution -
I have created three threads each thread knows what it needs to print and what comes after it.
I have also created a Class NLock which holds the next word which needs to be printed.
Whenever a thread is able to acquire NLock lock then it checks
if it's his turn if yes then it prints the word and set the next value to be printed in NLock or else it waits till it's his turn
public class SynchronizeThreeThreads {
public static void main(String args[]) throws InterruptedException {
NLock lock=new NLock("A");
Thread a =new Thread(new PrintInOrder("A","B",lock));
Thread b =new Thread(new PrintInOrder("B","C",lock));
Thread c =new Thread(new PrintInOrder("C","A",lock));
a.start();
b.start();
c.start();
c.join(); // Once all is done main thread will exit
System.out.println("Done");
}
}
class NLock{
private String value;
public NLock(String value) {
this.value=value;
}
public String getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(String next) {
this.value=next;
}
}
class PrintInOrder implements Runnable{
private String word;
private String next;
private NLock lock;
public PrintInOrder(String word, String next,NLock lock){
this.word=word;
this.next=next;
this.lock=lock;
}
#Override
public void run() {
int i=0;
while(i<3) {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
//Check if it's my turn
if(lock.getValue().equals(word)) {
System.out.println(this.word);
//Set what next needs to be printed
//So that when that thread wakes up it knows that it's his turn
lock.setValue(next);
i++;
lock.notifyAll();
Thread.sleep(100);
}
else //Nope not my turn wait
lock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
}
Below is the output
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
Done
This is my attempt to solve the same. Any suggestions are welcome. This is the complete running code.
import lombok.SneakyThrows;
import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
#Slf4j
public class SeqExecution {
static class SeqThread extends Thread {
private static final Object lock = new Object();
private static final AtomicInteger AUTO_COUNTER = new AtomicInteger();
private static final TrackExecution trackExecution = new TrackExecution();
private final int seqNo;
SeqThread(Runnable runnable) {
super(runnable);
this.seqNo = AUTO_COUNTER.getAndIncrement();
}
#SneakyThrows
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
synchronized (lock) {
while (trackExecution.CUR_EXECUTION.get() != this.seqNo) {
try {
lock.wait(100);
} catch (Exception e) {}
}
//log.info("Thread: {} is running", this.seqNo);
super.run();
sleep(1000);
trackExecution.increment();
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
static class TrackExecution {
private final AtomicInteger CUR_EXECUTION = new AtomicInteger();
int get() {
return CUR_EXECUTION.get();
}
synchronized void increment() {
var val = CUR_EXECUTION.incrementAndGet();
if (val >= SeqThread.AUTO_COUNTER.get()) {
CUR_EXECUTION.set(0);
}
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
final var seqThreads = List.of(new SeqThread(() -> System.out.print("A ")),
new SeqThread(() -> System.out.print("B ")),
new SeqThread(() -> System.out.print("C ")));
seqThreads.forEach(Thread::start);
seqThreads.forEach(t -> {
try {
t.join();
} catch (Exception e) {
log.warn(e.getMessage(), e);
}
});
}
}
I think it's simpler to achieve this using join.
Example:
public static void main(String[] args) {
final Thread t1 = new Thread("t1") {
#Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("i am thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
}
};
final Thread t2 = new Thread(t1, "t2") {
#Override
public void run() {
t1.start();
try {
t1.join();
} catch ( InterruptedException e ) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("i am thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
}
};
Thread t3 = new Thread(t2, "t3") {
#Override
public void run() {
t2.start();
try {
t2.join();
} catch ( InterruptedException e ) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("i am thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
}
};
t3.start();
}
Here is my solution please try and let me know
package thread;
class SyncPrinter {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SyncPrinterAction printAction1 = new SyncPrinterAction(new int[]{1,5,9,13}, true);
SyncPrinterAction printAction2 = new SyncPrinterAction(new int[]{2,6,10,14}, true);
SyncPrinterAction printAction3 = new SyncPrinterAction(new int[]{3,7,11,15}, true);
SyncPrinterAction printAction4 = new SyncPrinterAction(new int[]{4,8,12,16}, false);
printAction1.setDependentAction(printAction4);
printAction2.setDependentAction(printAction1);
printAction3.setDependentAction(printAction2);
printAction4.setDependentAction(printAction3);
new Thread(printAction1, "T1").start();;
new Thread(printAction2, "T2").start();
new Thread(printAction3, "T3").start();
new Thread(printAction4, "T4").start();
}
}
class SyncPrinterAction implements Runnable {
private volatile boolean dependent;
private SyncPrinterAction dependentAction;
int[] data;
public void setDependentAction(SyncPrinterAction dependentAction){
this.dependentAction = dependentAction;
}
public SyncPrinterAction( int[] data, boolean dependent) {
this.data = data;
this.dependent = dependent;
}
public SyncPrinterAction( int[] data, SyncPrinterAction dependentAction, boolean dependent) {
this.dependentAction = dependentAction;
this.data = data;
this.dependent = dependent;
}
#Override
public void run() {
synchronized (this) {
for (int value : data) {
try {
while(dependentAction.isDependent())
//System.out.println("\t\t"+Thread.currentThread().getName() + " :: Waithing for dependent action to complete");
wait(100);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
dependentAction.setDependent(true);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " :: " +value);
dependent = false;
}
}
}
private void setDependent(boolean dependent) {
this.dependent = dependent;
}
private boolean isDependent() {
return dependent;
}
}
I am trying to write a simple code to print numbers in sequence. Scenario is like
Thread Number
T1 1
T2 2
T3 3
T1 4
T2 5
T3 6
T1 7
T2 8
T3 9
...and so on.
Here is the
public class ThreadNumberPrinter {
Object monitor = new Object();
AtomicInteger number = new AtomicInteger(1);
public static void main(String[] args) {
ThreadNumberPrinter tnp = new ThreadNumberPrinter();
Thread t1 = new Thread(tnp.new Printer(1, 3));
Thread t2 = new Thread(tnp.new Printer(2, 3));
Thread t3 = new Thread(tnp.new Printer(3, 3));
t3.start();
t1.start();
t2.start();
}
class Printer implements Runnable {
int threadId;
int numOfThreads;
public Printer(int id, int nubOfThreads) {
threadId = id;
this.numOfThreads = nubOfThreads;
}
public void run() {
print();
}
private void print() {
try {
while (true) {
Thread.sleep(1000l);
synchronized (monitor) {
if (number.get() % numOfThreads != threadId) {
monitor.wait();
} else {
System.out.println("ThreadId [" + threadId
+ "] printing -->"
+ number.getAndIncrement());
monitor.notifyAll();
}
}
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
But just after 2nd thread runs and prints the number 2, all thread get into wait stage and nothing gets printed. I am not sure where I am doing wrong.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
public class TestClass {
private volatile Integer count = 1;
private volatile Integer threadIdToRun = 1;
private Object object = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
TestClass testClass = new TestClass();
Thread t1 = new Thread(testClass.new Printer(1));
Thread t2 = new Thread(testClass.new Printer(2));
Thread t3 = new Thread(testClass.new Printer(3));
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
}
class Printer implements Runnable {
private int threadId;
public Printer(int threadId) {
super();
this.threadId = threadId;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try {
while (count <= 20) {
synchronized (object) {
if (threadId != threadIdToRun) {
object.wait();
} else {
System.out.println("Thread " + threadId + " printed " + count);
count += 1;
if (threadId == 1)
threadIdToRun = 2;
else if (threadId == 2)
threadIdToRun = 3;
else if (threadId == 3)
threadIdToRun = 1;
object.notifyAll();
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
Above program gives output
Thread 1 printed 1
Thread 2 printed 2
Thread 3 printed 3
Thread 1 printed 4
Thread 2 printed 5
Thread 3 printed 6
Thread 1 printed 7
Thread 2 printed 8
Thread 3 printed 9
Thread 1 printed 10
Thread 2 printed 11
Thread 3 printed 12
Thread 1 printed 13
Thread 2 printed 14
Thread 3 printed 15
Thread 1 printed 16
Thread 2 printed 17
Thread 3 printed 18
Thread 1 printed 19
Thread 2 printed 20
Well, the problem is that modulo 3 % 3 is 0. Change your threadIds to 0..2 instead of 1..3 and hopefully it should work.
Though this is a bad way for using threads, if we still want it a generic solution can be to have a worker thread which will store its id:
class Worker extends Thread {
private final ResourceLock resourceLock;
private final int threadNumber;
private final AtomicInteger counter;
private volatile boolean running = true;
public Worker(ResourceLock resourceLock, int threadNumber, AtomicInteger counter) {
this.resourceLock = resourceLock;
this.threadNumber = threadNumber;
this.counter = counter;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while (running) {
try {
synchronized (resourceLock) {
while (resourceLock.flag != threadNumber) {
resourceLock.wait();
}
System.out.println("Thread:" + threadNumber + " value: " + counter.incrementAndGet());
Thread.sleep(1000);
resourceLock.flag = (threadNumber + 1) % resourceLock.threadsCount;
resourceLock.notifyAll();
}
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception: " + e);
}
}
}
public void shutdown() {
running = false;
}
}
The ResourceLock class would store flag and max threads count:
class ResourceLock {
public volatile int flag;
public final int threadsCount;
public ResourceLock(int threadsCount) {
this.flag = 0;
this.threadsCount = threadsCount;
}
}
And then main class can use it as below:
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final int threadsCount = 3;
final ResourceLock lock = new ResourceLock(threadsCount);
Worker[] threads = new Worker[threadsCount];
final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);
for(int i=0; i<threadsCount; i++) {
threads[i] = new Worker(lock, i, counter);
threads[i].start();
}
Thread.sleep(10000);
System.out.println("Will try to shutdown now...");
for(Worker worker: threads) {
worker.shutdown();
}
}
Here after a certain delay we may like to stop the count and the method shutdown in worker provides this provision.
Below code uses the logic of notifying the next thread to print the number and then incrementing it by 1 and then again notifying the next thread and then go in wait state till some thread notifies it.
Eg. T1 first prints the value and then makes boolean "second" true for T2 to print the next number. T2 after printing the number makes boolean "third" true for T3. T3 does the same thing by making boolean "first" true for T1 to print the next number.
T1 -> T2 -> T3 -> T1 -> T2 -> T3 -> ........ and so on.
public class Test{
public static volatile int i = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
Object monitor = new Object();
Notifier notifier = new Notifier(monitor);
Thread thread1 = new Thread(notifier, "T1");
Thread thread2 = new Thread(notifier, "T2");
Thread thread3 = new Thread(notifier, "T3");
thread1.start();
thread2.start();
thread3.start();
}
}
class Notifier implements Runnable {
private Object monitor = null;
private static int i = 1;
private static boolean first = true;
private static boolean second = false;
private static boolean third = false;
public Notifier(Object objcurr) {
this.monitor = objcurr;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try {
while (true) {
synchronized (monitor) {
String Tname = Thread.currentThread().getName();
if (first && Tname.equalsIgnoreCase("T1")) {
print();
first = false;
second = true;
monitor.notifyAll();
monitor.wait();
} else if (second && Tname.equalsIgnoreCase("T2")) {
print();
second = false;
third = true;
monitor.notifyAll();
monitor.wait();
} else if (third && Tname.equalsIgnoreCase("T3")) {
print();
third = false;
first = true;
monitor.notifyAll();
monitor.wait();
} else {
monitor.wait();
}
}
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private void print() {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " - " + Notifier.i++);
}
How about this?
public class PrintNumbers implements Runnable {
public static final int NO_OF_THREADS = 3;
public static final int MAX_DIGIT = 20;
public static final String THREAD_NAME_PREFIX = "t";
volatile int current = 1;
private Object lock = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
PrintNumbers printNumbers = new PrintNumbers();
for (int i = 1; i <= NO_OF_THREADS; i++) {
new Thread(printNumbers, THREAD_NAME_PREFIX + i).start();
}
}
#Override
public void run() {
String printThread;
while (current < MAX_DIGIT) {
synchronized (lock) {
if (current % NO_OF_THREADS != 0) {
printThread = THREAD_NAME_PREFIX + current % NO_OF_THREADS;
} else {
printThread = THREAD_NAME_PREFIX + NO_OF_THREADS;
}
if (!printThread.equals(Thread.currentThread().getName())) {
try {
lock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
if (printThread.equals(Thread.currentThread().getName())) {
System.out.println(String.format("Thread %s : %s", Thread.currentThread().getName(), current));
current = current + 1;
}
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
package com.sourav.mock.Thread;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
public class ThreeThreadComunication implements Runnable {
AtomicInteger counter;
int[] array;
static final Object mutex = new Object();
public ThreeThreadComunication(int[] array, AtomicInteger counter){
this.counter = counter;
this.array = array;
}
#Override
public void run() {
int i = 0;
while(i < array.length){
synchronized(mutex){
if(Integer.parseInt(Thread.currentThread().getName()) == counter.get()){
System.out.println(array[i]);
if(counter.get() == 3){
counter.getAndSet(1);
}else{
int c = counter.get();
counter.getAndSet(++c);
}
i++;
}
mutex.notifyAll();
try {
mutex.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
}
package com.sourav.mock.Thread;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
public class ThreeThreadComunicationTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(1);
int[] array1 = new int[]{1, 4, 7};
int[] array2 = new int[]{2, 5, 8};
int[] array3 = new int[]{3, 6, 9};
ThreeThreadComunication obj1 = new ThreeThreadComunication(array1, counter);
ThreeThreadComunication obj2 = new ThreeThreadComunication(array2, counter);
ThreeThreadComunication obj3 = new ThreeThreadComunication(array3, counter);
Thread t1 = new Thread(obj1, "1");
Thread t2 = new Thread(obj2, "2");
Thread t3 = new Thread(obj3, "3");
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
}
}
public class EvenOdd1 {
//public static String str ="str1";
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
EvenOdd1 edd1 = new EvenOdd1();
AbThread tr2 = new AbThread(0,edd1);
AbThread tr3 = new AbThread(1,edd1);
AbThread tr4 = new AbThread(2,edd1);
tr2.start();
tr3.start();
tr4.start();
}
}
class AbThread extends Thread {
int mod;
int mod_count=1;
EvenOdd1 edd1;
public static int count=1;
int num_thread=3;
public AbThread(int mod,EvenOdd1 edd1){
this.mod = mod;
this.edd1 = edd1;
}
public void run()
{
synchronized(edd1)
{
try{
while(true){
while(count%num_thread!=mod)
edd1.wait();
if(count==30)
break;
print();
edd1.wait();
}
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
public void print()
{
int val = mod==1?2*mod_count:(mod==2?3*mod_count:4*mod_count);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " : " + val);
edd1.notifyAll();
count=count+1;
this.mod_count++ ;
}
}
public class PrintThreadsSequentially {
static int number = 1;
static final int PRINT_NUMBERS_UPTO = 20;
static Object lock = new Object();
static class SequentialThread extends Thread {
int remainder = 0;
int noOfThreads = 0;
public SequentialThread(String name, int remainder, int noOfThreads) {
super(name);
this.remainder = remainder;
this.noOfThreads = noOfThreads;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while (number < PRINT_NUMBERS_UPTO) {
synchronized (lock) {
while (number % noOfThreads != remainder) { // wait for numbers other than remainder
try {
lock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println(getName() + " value " + number);
number++;
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SequentialThread first = new SequentialThread("First Thread", 0, 4);
SequentialThread second = new SequentialThread("Second Thread", 1, 4);
SequentialThread third = new SequentialThread("Third Thread", 2, 4);
SequentialThread fourth = new SequentialThread("Fourth Thread", 3, 4);
first.start(); second.start(); third.start(); fourth.start();
}
}
The ThreadSynchronization class can be used to print numbers between 'n' no. of threads in sequence.
The logic is to create a common object between each of the consecutive threads and use 'wait', 'notify' to print the numbers in sequence.
Note: Last thread will share an object with the first thread.
You can change the 'maxThreads' value to increase or decrease the number of thread in the program before running it.
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class ThreadSynchronization {
public static int i = 1;
public static final int maxThreads = 10;
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Object> list = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < maxThreads; i++) {
list.add(new Object());
}
Object currObject = list.get(maxThreads - 1);
for (int i = 0; i < maxThreads; i++) {
Object nextObject = list.get(i);
RunnableClass1 a = new RunnableClass1(currObject, nextObject, i == 0 ? true : false);
Thread th = new Thread(a);
th.setName("Thread - " + (i + 1));
th.start();
currObject = list.get(i);
}
}
}
class RunnableClass implements Runnable {
private Object currObject;
private Object nextObject;
private boolean firstThread;
public RunnableClass(Object currObject, Object nextObject, boolean first) {
this.currObject = currObject;
this.nextObject = nextObject;
this.firstThread = first;
}
#Override
public void run() {
int i = 0;
try {
if (firstThread) {
Thread.sleep(5000);
firstThread = false;
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " - " + ThreadSynchronization.i++);
synchronized (nextObject) {
nextObject.notify();
}
}
while (i++ < Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
synchronized (currObject) {
currObject.wait();
}
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " - " + ThreadSynchronization.i++);
Thread.sleep(1000);
synchronized (nextObject) {
nextObject.notify();
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
I have tried it below simple way to print in sequence using three threads and it is working well.
public class AppPrint123 {
static int count = 1;
static int counter = 1;
static Object lock = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread t1 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (true) {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
while (count != 1) {
lock.wait();
}
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ": " + counter);
count++;
counter++;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}, "T1");
Thread t2 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (true) {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
while (count != 2) {
lock.wait();
}
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ": " + counter);
counter++;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}, "T2");
Thread t3 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (true) {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
while (count != 3) {
lock.wait();
}
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ": " + counter);
count = count - 2;
counter++;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}, "T3");
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
}
}
You can print count variable instead if you want to generate output like 123123123 in sequence using three threads.
Bad way to do but ask is to implement using multiple threads:
private static AtomicInteger currentThreadNo = new AtomicInteger(0);
private static int currentNo = 1;
private static final Object lock = new Object();
Above, these values are static so that they remain same for all the worker objects.
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
public class PrintNumbersUsingNThreads implements Runnable {
private final int threadNo;
private final int totalThreads;
private static AtomicInteger currentThreadNo = new AtomicInteger(0);
private static int currentNo = 1;
private static final Object lock = new Object();
public PrintNumbersUsingNThreads(int threadNo, int totalThreads) {
this.threadNo = threadNo;
this.totalThreads = totalThreads;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
while (currentThreadNo.get() % totalThreads != threadNo) {
try {
synchronized (lock) {
lock.wait();
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " printing " + currentNo);
currentNo++;
int curr = currentThreadNo.get();
if (curr == totalThreads) {
currentThreadNo.set(1);
} else {
currentThreadNo.incrementAndGet();
}
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
synchronized (lock) {
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int totalThreads = 3;
for(int i = 0; i < totalThreads; i++){
new Thread(new PrintNumbersUsingNThreads(i,totalThreads),"thread"+i).start();
}
}
}
output:
thread0 printing 1
thread1 printing 2
thread2 printing 3
thread0 printing 4
thread1 printing 5
thread2 printing 6
thread0 printing 7
thread1 printing 8
thread2 printing 9
thread0 printing 10
thread1 printing 11
thread2 printing 12
thread0 printing 13
thread1 printing 14
thread2 printing 15
thread0 printing 16
thread1 printing 17
thread2 printing 18
Below is very generic code. i agree it is not good practice to use multiple threads for such cases
class MultipleThreads implements Runnable {
AtomicInteger integer;
int max_val = 100;
int remainder;
int numofThreads;
public MultipleThreads(AtomicInteger integer, int remainder, int numofThreads) {
this.integer = integer;
this.remainder = remainder;
this.numofThreads = numofThreads;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while (integer.intValue() <= max_val) {
synchronized (integer) {
while (integer.intValue() % numofThreads != remainder) {
try {
integer.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
if (integer.intValue() > max_val)
break;
System.out.println("printing :" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " : " + integer.getAndIncrement());
integer.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
public class ThreadSynchronization {
public static void main(String[] args) {
AtomicInteger at = new AtomicInteger(1);
MultipleThreads th1 = new MultipleThreads(at, 1, 5);
MultipleThreads th2 = new MultipleThreads(at, 2, 5);
MultipleThreads th3 = new MultipleThreads(at, 3, 5);
MultipleThreads th4 = new MultipleThreads(at, 4, 5);
MultipleThreads th5 = new MultipleThreads(at, 0, 5);
new Thread(th1).start();
new Thread(th2).start();
new Thread(th3).start();
new Thread(th4).start();
new Thread(th5).start();
}
}
Also, make sure to use pthread_cond_broadcast instead of phread_cond_signal
#include "stdio.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "pthread.h"
pthread_mutex_t count_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
pthread_cond_t condition_var = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
void *functionCount1();
void *functionCount2();
void *functionCount3();
int count = 0;
#define COUNT_DONE 10
void main()
{
pthread_t thread1, thread2, thread3;
pthread_create( &thread1, NULL, &functionCount1, NULL);
pthread_create( &thread2, NULL, &functionCount2, NULL);
pthread_create( &thread3, NULL, &functionCount3, NULL);
pthread_join( thread1, NULL);
pthread_join( thread2, NULL);
pthread_join( thread3, NULL);
exit(0);
}
// Let me write what I think
// we can;t do he %2 %3 since multiple threads may satisfy the conditions.
// count = 0; count % 3 = 0
// count = 1; count % 3 = 1
// count = 2; count % 3 = 2
// count = 3; cooun % 3 = 0
// Print odd numbers
void *functionCount1()
{
for(;;) {
// Lock mutex and then wait for signal to relase mutex
pthread_mutex_lock( &count_mutex );
if ( count % 3 == 0 ) {
printf("Counter value functionCount1: %d\n",count);
count++;
pthread_cond_broadcast( &condition_var );
} else {
pthread_cond_wait( &condition_var, &count_mutex );
}
if ( count >= COUNT_DONE ) {
pthread_mutex_unlock( &count_mutex );
return(NULL);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock( &count_mutex );
}
}
// print even numbers
void *functionCount2()
{
for(;;) {
// Lock mutex and then wait for signal to relase mutex
pthread_mutex_lock( &count_mutex );
if ( count % 3 == 1 ) {
printf("Counter value functionCount2: %d\n",count);
count++;
pthread_cond_broadcast( &condition_var );
} else {
pthread_cond_wait( &condition_var, &count_mutex );
}
if( count >= COUNT_DONE ) {
pthread_mutex_unlock( &count_mutex );
return(NULL);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock( &count_mutex );
}
}
// print even numbers
void *functionCount3()
{
for(;;) {
// Lock mutex and then wait for signal to relase mutex
pthread_mutex_lock( &count_mutex );
if ( count % 3 == 2 ) {
printf("Counter value functionCount3: %d\n",count);
count++;
pthread_cond_broadcast( &condition_var );
} else {
pthread_cond_wait( &condition_var, &count_mutex );
}
if( count >= COUNT_DONE ) {
pthread_mutex_unlock( &count_mutex );
return(NULL);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock( &count_mutex );
}
}
Here is my solution. It is pretty simple and easy to understand. It will help if you are using static variables...
Note that using a lock object is crucial as I tried initially with the this keyword(ex: synchronized(this) ), but it was not been synchronized among all threads.
public class Assignment_Three_Threads {
public static int TotalNumberOfThreads = 3;
public static void main(String[] args) {
multiThread t1 = new multiThread(1);
multiThread t2 = new multiThread(2);
multiThread t3 = new multiThread(3);
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
}
}
class multiThread extends Thread{
int k=2;
private int threadId ;
private static int threadIdToRun = 1;
private static final Object lock = new Object();
multiThread(int id)
{
super();
this.threadId = id;
}
#Override
public void run() {
for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) {
synchronized (lock) {
while(true) {
if (this.threadId != threadIdToRun) {
try {
lock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
if (this.threadId == threadIdToRun) {
System.out.println("Thread : " + this.threadId);
threadIdToRun =
(threadIdToRun % Assignment_Three_Threads.TotalNumberOfThreads) + 1;
// System.out.println("Next Thread to be printed " + threadIdToRun);
lock.notifyAll();
break;
}
}
}
}
}
}
A general solution for any number of Threads-
for 3 thread logic =MIN % 3 != reminder
for 4 thread= MIN % 4 != reminder
public class PrintSequenceRunnable1 implements Runnable {
int reminder;
static Object lock=new Object();
static int MIN=1;
int MAX=20;
PrintSequenceRunnable1(int reminder){
this.reminder=reminder;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread t1= new Thread(new PrintSequenceRunnable1(1),"T1");
Thread t2= new Thread(new PrintSequenceRunnable1(2),"T2");
Thread t3= new Thread(new PrintSequenceRunnable1(0),"T3");
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
}
#Override
public void run() {
synchronized (lock) {
while (MIN < MAX - 1) {
while (MIN % 3 != reminder) {
try {
lock.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + "-" + MIN);
MIN++;
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
}
}
public class ThreadTask implements Runnable {
private int counter;
private int threadID;
private final Object lock;
private int prev;
public ThreadTask(Object obj, int threadid, int counter){
this.lock = obj; // monitor
this.threadID = threadid; //id of thread
this.counter = counter;
this.prev =threadid + 1;
}
public void run(){
while(counter<100){
synchronized(lock){
if(counter == this.prev && this.threadID % 3 == this.threadID){
System.out.println("T" + this.threadID + " = " + this.prev);
this.prev = this.prev + 3;
}
counter++;
lock.notifyAll();
try{
lock.wait();
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
}
public class ThreadMain {
static volatile int counter = 1;
public static void main(String args[]) throws InterruptedException{
final Object lock = new Object();
ThreadTask first = new ThreadTask(lock, 0, counter);
ThreadTask second = new ThreadTask(lock, 1, counter);
ThreadTask third = new ThreadTask(lock, 2, counter);
Thread t1 = new Thread(first, "first");
Thread t2 = new Thread(second, "second");
Thread t3 = new Thread(third, "third");
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
t1.join();
t2.join();
t3.join();
}
}
package ThreadCoreConcepts;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
/**
* 3 Thread T1,T2,T3 will print output {1,2,3 4,5,6 7,8,9} Where T1 will print
* {1,4,7} , T2 will print { 2,5,8} and T3 will print {3,6,9}
*
* #author harsmahe
*
*/
public class ThreeThreadSequenceGen {
private volatile static int value = 1;
public static void main(String args[]) throws InterruptedException {
ThreeThreadSequenceGen gen = new ThreeThreadSequenceGen();
Object mutex = new Object();
Thread t1 = new Thread(gen.new RunThread(1, mutex));
t1.setName("1");
Thread t2 = new Thread(gen.new RunThread(2, mutex));
t2.setName("2");
Thread t3 = new Thread(gen.new RunThread(3, mutex));
t3.setName("3");
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
}
class RunThread implements Runnable {
private int start = 0;
private Object mutex;
private List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
public RunThread(final int start, Object mutex) {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
this.start = start;
this.mutex = mutex;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try {
while (value <= 9) {
// while (true) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
int name = Integer.valueOf(Thread.currentThread().getName());
// System.out.println("[" + Thread.currentThread().getName()
// + "]");
// notifyAll();
synchronized (mutex) {
if (name == 1 && value == start) {
list.add(value);
System.out.println("[" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + "]" + value);
start = start + 3;
value++;
mutex.notifyAll();
mutex.wait();
} else if (name == 2 && value == start) {
System.out.println("[" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + "]" + value);
list.add(value);
start = start + 3;
value++;
mutex.notifyAll();
mutex.wait();
} else if (name == 3 && value == start) {
System.out.println("[" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + "]" + value);
list.add(value);
start = start + 3;
value++;
mutex.notifyAll();
if (value < 9) {
mutex.wait();
}
} else {
mutex.notifyAll();
// mutex.wait();
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
// System.out.println(list);
}
}
}
}
I'm trying to solve the producer consumer problem with threads in java, but the code won't run in parallell/concurrently. The producer always fills up the buffer completely before the consumer starts to consume, and I don't get why. The point is trying to do it using only synchronized blocks, wait() and notify().
Main :
String [] data = {"Fisk", "Katt", "Hund", "Sau", "Fugl", "Elg", "Tiger",
"Kameleon", "Isbjørn", "Puma"};
ProducerConsumer pc = new ProducerConsumer(5);
Thread[] thrds = new Thread[2];
thrds[0] = new Thread(new MyThread1(pc, data)); // producer
thrds[1] = new Thread(new MyThread2(pc)); // consumer
thrds[0].start();
thrds[1].start();
for(int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { // wait for all threads to die
try {
thrds[i].join();
}
catch (InterruptedException ie) {}
}
System.exit(0);
ProducerConsumer.java:
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.Queue;
public class ProducerConsumer implements Runnable {
private int bufferSize;
private Queue<String> buffer;
public ProducerConsumer(int size) {
bufferSize = size;
buffer = new LinkedList<String>();
}
public void produce(String item) throws InterruptedException {
synchronized(buffer) {
while (buffer.size() >= bufferSize) {
try {
System.out.println("Full buffer. Waiting for consumer...");
buffer.wait();
}catch (Exception e) {}
}
buffer.add(item);
System.out.println("Producer is putting " + item + " in the buffer");
buffer.notify();
}
}
public void consume() throws InterruptedException {
synchronized (buffer) {
while (buffer.size() == 0) {
try {
System.out.println("Empty buffer. Waiting for production...");
buffer.wait();
}catch (Exception e) {}
}
System.out.println("Consumer is consuming " + buffer.remove() + ".");
buffer.notify();
}
}
#Override
public void run() {
}
}
MyThread1 :
/*
* PRODUCER - Thread
*/
public class MyThread1 implements Runnable {
private String [] data;
private ProducerConsumer pc;
public MyThread1(ProducerConsumer pc, String [] data) {
this.pc = pc;
this.data = data;
}
#Override
public void run() {
for (int i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
try {
pc.produce(data[i]);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {}
}
}
}
MyThread2:
//THE CONSUMER - Thread
public class MyThread2 implements Runnable{
private ProducerConsumer pc;
public MyThread2(ProducerConsumer pc) {
this.pc = pc;
}
//Run consume
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
try {
pc.consume();
Thread.sleep(2);
}
catch(InterruptedException e) {}
}
}
}
On recent machines, with short queues like this, you will never see actual multithreading effects like, in this case, producer and consumer taking turns unless you slow both of them down a bit. You only slowed down the consumer. Instead of using a short array, put a million Integers in a queue and see what happens.
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList;
public class ProduserConsumerDemo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Integer> list = new CopyOnWriteArrayList<>();
int size = 5;
Producer producer = new Producer(list, size);
Consumer consumer = new Consumer(list);
Thread t1 = new Thread(producer, "Producer");
Thread t2 = new Thread(consumer, "Consumer");
t1.start();
t2.start();
}
}
class Producer implements Runnable {
private final List<Integer> list;
private final int size;
public Producer(List<Integer> list, final int size) {
this.list = list;
this.size = size;
}
public void run() {
try {
produce();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private void produce() throws InterruptedException {
int i = 0;
while (i >= 0) {
synchronized (list) {
while (list.size() == size) {
System.out.println(
"List is full." + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " is waiting. Size:" + list.size());
list.wait();
}
System.out.println("Produce :" + i);
list.add(i++);
Thread.sleep(50);
list.notify();
}
}
}
}
class Consumer implements Runnable {
private final List<Integer> list;
public Consumer(List<Integer> list) {
this.list = list;
}
public void run() {
try {
consume();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private void consume() throws InterruptedException {
while (true) {
synchronized (list) {
while (list.isEmpty()) {
System.out.println(
"List is empty. " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " is waiting. Size:" + list.size());
list.wait();
}
System.out.println("Consumed item:" + list.remove(0));
Thread.sleep(50);
list.notify();
}
}
}
}
public class CyclicBar {
private final static CyclicBarrier cb = new CyclicBarrier(3,
new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("\n-------------");
}
});
public static void main(String[] args) {
final class ColouredRunnable implements Runnable {
private int i;
public ColouredRunnable(int j) {
this.i = j;
}
#Override
public void run() {
final String name = Thread.currentThread().getName();
while (true) {
cyclicAwait();
for (int i = 0; i < name.length(); i++) {
sleep();
// System.out.print("" + name.charAt(i) + this.i + " ");
System.out.print("" + name.charAt(i) + " ");
}
}
}
}
;
int i = 0;
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable(i++), "RED").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable(i++), "BLUE").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable(i++), "GREEN").start();
}
private static int cyclicAwait() {
try {
return cb.await();
} catch (InterruptedException | BrokenBarrierException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
return -1;
}
private static void sleep() {
try {
Thread.sleep(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextLong(200, 600));
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Above code currently prints
-------------
G R B R E L E E D U E N
-------------
B R G E R L U E D E E N
-------------
R G B E L R E U D E E N
-------------
R G B E R L U E D E E N
-------------
B R G E L D R U E E E N
-------------
How to alter above code and add proper barrier at appropriate location to produce following output
-------------
R E D B L U E G R E E N
-------------
R E D B L U E G R E E N
-------------
R E D B L U E G R E E N
Constraints
Must use one of modern java concurrent higher level Objects
Should not use implicit locking synchronised wait notify
must print individual characters using System.out.print()
use 3 thread with each thread must print its name (colour)
It should be printed in the order RED BLUE GREEN
public class TestSynMain {
private final static AbstractQueuedSynchronizer cb = new TestSynchronizer(6);
public static void main(String[] args) {
final class ColouredRunnable implements Runnable {
private String color;
public ColouredRunnable(String color) {
this.color = color;
}
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
try {
boolean result = false;
do{
result = cb.tryAcquireNanos(Integer.parseInt(Thread.currentThread().getName()), TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(1000));
}while(!result);
for (int i = 0; i < color.length(); i++) {
try {
Thread.sleep(300);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
System.exit(-1);
}
System.out.print("" + color.charAt(i) + " ");
}
} catch (NumberFormatException e1) {
e1.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
e1.printStackTrace();
}finally{
cb.release(Integer.parseInt(Thread.currentThread().getName()));
}
}
}
}
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable("RED"), "0").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable("BLUE"), "1").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable("GREEN"), "2").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable("BLACK"), "3").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable("MAGENTA"), "4").start();
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable("WHITE"), "5").start();
}
}
public class TestSynchronizer extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer{
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
int count;
public TestSynchronizer(int count) {
this.count = count;
setState(0);
}
#Override
protected boolean tryAcquire(int arg) {
if(arg == getState()){
System.out.println("Acquires" + Thread.currentThread().getName());
setExclusiveOwnerThread(Thread.currentThread());
return true;
}
return false;
}
#Override
protected boolean tryRelease(int arg) {
int state = getState();
setState(++state % count);
setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
return true;
}
}
How to use it?
Synchronizer takes one argument count that is for upto how many threads have to synchronize.
The names of the threads MUST be the order they need to take. Now you can add as many threads to it as you need.
I have designed a custom Synchronizer and used that to define a new policy for allowing locking and unlocking of threads.
Phasers are pretty cool for this too if you want to play with them. All this one requires is that you populate the words list with whatever words you want - it makes a thread for each word and they all play nicely.
public class PhaserTest
{
private final Phaser phaser = new Phaser(1) {
protected boolean onAdvance(int phase, int parties)
{
//Phaser version of your CyclicBarrier Runnable
if(parties == 1)
System.out.println("\n-------------");
return false;
}
};
public void runTest()
{
List<String> words = Arrays.asList("RED", "BLUE", "GREEN");
for(int i = 0; i < words.size();i++)
new Thread(new ColouredRunnable(words.get(i),i + 1)).start();
while(phaser.arriveAndAwaitAdvance() != (words.size() + 1)){}
System.out.println("Done.");
}
public class ColouredRunnable implements Runnable {
private final int order;
private final String color;
public ColouredRunnable(String s, int order) {
this.color = s;
this.order = order;
phaser.register();
}
#Override
public void run() {
while(phaser.arriveAndAwaitAdvance() != order){}
for (int i = 0; i < color.length(); i++) {
sleep();
System.out.print("" + color.charAt(i) + " ");
}
phaser.arriveAndDeregister();
}
private void sleep() {
try {
Thread.sleep(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextLong(200, 600));
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
This solution uses 3 cyclic barriers. Code initially creates a managed deadlock between threads using cyclic barriers. Deadlock is broken by triggering cb[cb.length-1].await(); in main thread
public static void main(String[] args) {
String colors[] = { "RED", "BLUE", "GREEN" };
final CyclicBarrier[] cb = createCB(colors);
for (int i = 0; i < colors.length; i++) {
final int j = i;
new Thread(colors[i]) {
public void run() {
while (true) {
try {
cb[(j == 0 ? cb.length : j) - 1].await();// Wait for
// previous
// barrier
String name = getName();
for (int i = 0; i < name.length(); i++) {
CyclicBari.sleep();
System.out.print(" " + name.charAt(i) + " ");
}
cb[j].await();// Notify next
} catch (InterruptedException | BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}.start();
}
System.out.println("start");
try {
cb[cb.length-1].await();
} catch (InterruptedException | BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private static void sleep() {
try {
Thread.sleep(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextLong(200, 600));
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private static CyclicBarrier[] createCB(String[] colors) {
final CyclicBarrier cb[] = new CyclicBarrier[colors.length];
for (int i = 0; i < cb.length; i++) {
final int j = i;
cb[i] = new CyclicBarrier(2, new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
if (j == cb.length - 1) {
System.out.println("\n-------------");
} else {
System.out.print(".");
}
}
});
}
return cb;
}
Output
-------------
R E D . B L U E . G R E E N
-------------
R E D . B L U E . G R E E N
-------------
R E D . B L U E . G R E E N
-------------