We Keep Coding

Iteration Order of HashMap key same or not

I want to know that HashMap is give same sequence of key when iterated each time after adding records.
I am using following code
HashMap<String,String> mapObj=new HashMap<String,String>();
mapObj.put("a", "aValue");
mapObj.put("b", "bValue");
mapObj.put("c", "cValue");
for(String key:mapObj.keySet()){
System.out.println(key+" :: "+mapObj.get(key));
}
for(String key:mapObj.keySet()){
System.out.println(key+" :: "+mapObj.get(key));
}
output of following program is
b :: bValue
c :: cValue
a :: aValue
b :: bValue
c :: cValue
a :: aValue

If you don't make any changes to the HashMap between the two iterations, you'll likely see the same iteration order (even though it's not guaranteed), since this is a deterministic data structure. However, adding or removing entries between the two iterations will probably change the iteration order.
If you want to rely on the iteration order, use LinkedHashMap, in which (by default) the keys are iterated in the order they were first added to the Map.
If you want to iterate over the keys in some specific order, you can use TreeMap instead (where the keys are ordered according to their natural ordering or the supplied Comparator).

Hash map accept the object to be stored as an argument and
generate a number that is unique to it.
HashMap uses hashing to store the entries in hashmap, so there is no gurantee those will appear in specific order. If you want your entries from your HashMap ordered, then you will have to sort it or you can use Treemap

HashMap doesn't maintain the order. If you want your elements to be retrieved in order then better to use LinkedHashMap.

Generally it would be little surprising if the iteration order changed for multiple subsequent invocations (assuming the map itself did not change in between). BUT you should not rely on it as API does not make any guarantee for that.
As per doc:
The Map interface provides three collection views, which allow a map's
contents to be viewed as a set of keys, collection of values, or set
of key-value mappings. The order of a map is defined as the order in
which the iterators on the map's collection views return their
elements. Some map implementations, like the TreeMap class, make
specific guarantees as to their order; others, like the HashMap
class, do not.
You can use LinkedHashMap as its entrySetmaintain insertion ordering, as per Java Doc:
This implementation differs from HashMap in that it maintains a
doubly-linked list running through all of its entries. This linked
list defines the iteration ordering, which is normally the order in
which keys were inserted into the map (insertion-order).
TreeMap maintain the natural ordering of keys.
A Red-Black tree based NavigableMap implementation. The map is sorted
according to the natural ordering of its keys, or by a Comparator
provided at map creation time, depending on which constructor is used.

How to get key position from a HashMap in Java

How can I get the key position in the map? How can I see on which position is "Audi" and "BMW"?
Map<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
map.put("Audi", 3);
map.put("BMW", 5);

As other answers state you need to use a structure like java.util.LinkedHashMap. LinkedHashMap maintains its keys internally using a LinkedEntrySet, this does not formally provide order, but iterates in the insertion order used.
If you pass the Map.keySet() into a List implementation you can make use of the List.indexOf(Object) method without having to write any of the extra code in the other answer.
Map<String, Integer> map = new LinkedHashMap<String, Integer>();
map.put("Audi", 3);
map.put("BMW", 5);
map.put("Vauxhall", 7);
List<String> indexes = new ArrayList<String>(map.keySet()); // <== Set to List
// BOOM !
System.out.println(indexes.indexOf("Audi")); // ==> 0
System.out.println(indexes.indexOf("BMW")); // ==> 1
System.out.println(indexes.indexOf("Vauxhall")); // ==> 2

You can't. The keys on a Map and a HashMap are not ordered. You'll need to use a structure that preserves order, such as a LinkedHashMap.
Note that LinkedHashMap does not provide a method that gets keys by position, so this is only appropriate if you are going to be using an iterator.
The alternative is to create a second Map that maps from your key to the Integer position, and add to it as you go along:
Map<String, Integer> indexMap = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
indexMap.put("Audi", 0);
indexMap.put("BMW", 1);
For a more elegant solution, you might need to give more information about what you're doing.

You can't. From the HashMap JavaDocs:
Hash table based implementation of the Map interface. This implementation provides all of the optional map operations, and permits null values and the null key. (The HashMap class is roughly equivalent to Hashtable, except that it is unsynchronized and permits nulls.) This class makes no guarantees as to the order of the map; in particular, it does not guarantee that the order will remain constant over time.
So, the order may vary between iterations. If you need to preserve the order you can take a look at LinkedHashMap
From the LinkedHashMap JavaDocs:
Hash table and linked list implementation of the Map interface, with predictable iteration order. This implementation differs from HashMap in that it maintains a doubly-linked list running through all of its entries. This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is normally the order in which keys were inserted into the map (insertion-order).
So, to find the key position you basically need to iterate the keys and count the position of the key you are searching for.
On a side note, IMO this may not be the best use of the Map datatype. I believe that if you really need the position you should use some type of List (e.g. ArrayList) that actually preserves the order and you can use the get method to retrieve elements for a certain index.

Iterating HashMap in order

I have a HashMap.
It has 100s of millions of observations.
What's the best way to iterate over the elements of the HashMap, in numerical order of the keys?
I considered changing to TreeMap, but did not do that since it may actually increase the load in creating the Map (as TreeMap is O(n), HashMap is O(1)).

With Java 8 you could use something similar to the following:
import static java.util.Comparator.comparing;
map.entrySet().stream()
.sorted(comparing(Entry::getKey))
.forEach(e -> doSomethingWithTheEntry(e));
That will obviously involve sorting the unsorted keys, which will come at a cost. So you need to decide whether you want to pay the cost upfront with a TreeMap or when required and keep using a HashMap.

You can't iterate over a HashMap in order. You'll have to use TreeMap for that. If you use a LinkedHashMap, you can iterate in the order the keys were inserted to the Map, but it's still not what you want (unless you insert the keys in numerical order).

If your insertion order is the same order as your keys, then you could use a LinkedHashMap.
Hash table and linked list implementation of the Map interface, with predictable iteration order. This implementation differs from HashMap in that it maintains a doubly-linked list running through all of its entries. This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is normally the order in which keys were inserted into the map (insertion-order). Note that insertion order is not affected if a key is re-inserted into the map. (A key k is reinserted into a map m if m.put(k, v) is invoked when m.containsKey(k) would return true immediately prior to the invocation.)

When to use linkedhashmap over hashmap in java?

What are the practical scenario for choosing among the linkedhashmap and hashmap? I have gone through working of each and come to the conclusion that linkedhashmap maintains the order of insertion i.e elements will be retrieved in the same order as that of insertion order while hashmap won't maintain order.
So can someone tell in what practical scenarios selection of one of the collection framework and why?

LinkedHashMap will iterate in the order in which the entries were put into the map.
null Values are allowed in LinkedHashMap.
The implementation is not synchronized and uses double linked buckets.
LinkedHashMap is very similar to HashMap, but it adds awareness to the order at which items are added or accessed, so the iteration order is the same as insertion order depending on construction parameters.
LinkedHashMap also provides a great starting point for creating a Cache object by overriding the removeEldestEntry() method. This lets you create a Cache object that can expire data using some criteria that you define.
Based on linked list and hashing data structures with linked list (think of indexed-SkipList) capability to store data in the way it gets inserted in the tree. Best suited to implement LRU ( least recently used ).
LinkedHashMap extends HashMap.
It maintains a linked list of the entries in the map, in the order in which they were inserted. This allows insertion-order iteration over the map. That is,when iterating through a collection-view of a LinkedHashMap, the elements will be returned in the order in which they were inserted. Also if one inserts the key again into the LinkedHashMap, the original order is retained. This allows insertion-order iteration over the map. That is, when iterating a LinkedHashMap, the elements will be returned in the order in which they were inserted. You can also create a LinkedHashMap that returns its elements in the order in which they were last accessed.
LinkedHashMap constructors
LinkedHashMap( )
This constructor constructs an empty insertion-ordered LinkedHashMap instance with the default initial capacity (16) and load factor (0.75).
LinkedHashMap(int capacity)
This constructor constructs an empty LinkedHashMap with the specified initial capacity.
LinkedHashMap(int capacity, float fillRatio)
This constructor constructs an empty LinkedHashMap with the specified initial capacity and load factor.
LinkedHashMap(Map m)
This constructor constructs a insertion-ordered Linked HashMap with the same mappings as the specified Map.
LinkedHashMap(int capacity, float fillRatio, boolean Order)
This constructor construct an empty LinkedHashMap instance with the specified initial capacity, load factor and ordering mode.
Important methods supported by LinkedHashMap
Class clear( )
Removes all mappings from the map.
containsValue(object value )>
Returns true if this map maps one or more keys to the specified value.
get(Object key)
Returns the value to which the specified key is mapped, or null if this map contains no mapping for the key.
removeEldestEntry(Map.Entry eldest)
Below is an example of how you can use LinkedHashMap:
Map<Integer, String> myLinkedHashMapObject = new LinkedHashMap<Integer, String>();
myLinkedHashMapObject.put(3, "car");
myLinkedHashMapObject.put(5, "bus");
myLinkedHashMapObject.put(7, "nano");
myLinkedHashMapObject.put(9, "innova");
System.out.println("Modification Before" + myLinkedHashMapObject);
System.out.println("Vehicle exists: " +myLinkedHashMapObject.containsKey(3));
System.out.println("vehicle innova Exists: "+myLinkedHashMapObject.containsValue("innova"));
System.out.println("Total number of vehicles: "+ myLinkedHashMapObject.size());
System.out.println("Removing vehicle 9: " + myLinkedHashMapObject.remove(9));
System.out.println("Removing vehicle 25 (does not exist): " + myLinkedHashMapObject.remove(25));
System.out.println("LinkedHashMap After modification" + myLinkedHashMapObject);

Shopping Cart is a real life example, where we see cart number against Item we have chosen in order we selected the item. So map could be LinkedHashMap<Cart Number Vs Item Chosen>

HashMap makes absolutely no guarantees about the iteration order. It can (and will) even change completely when new elements are added.
LinkedHashMap will iterate in the order in which the entries were put into the map
LinkedHashMap also requires more memory than HashMap because of this ordering feature. As I said before LinkedHashMap uses doubly LinkedList to keep order of elements.

In most cases when using a Map you don't care whether the order of insertion is maintained. Use a HashMap if you don't care, and a LinkedHashMap is you care.
However, if you look when and where maps are used, in many cases it contains only a few entries, not enough for the performance difference of the different implementations to make a difference.

LinkedHashMap maintain insertion order of keys, i.e the order in which keys are inserted into LinkedHashMap. On the other hand HashMap doesn't maintain any order or keys or values. In terms of Performance there is not much difference between HashMap and LinkedHashMap but yes LinkedHashMap has more memory foot print than HashMap to maintain doubly linked list which it uses to keep track of insertion order of keys.
A HashMap has a better performance than a LinkedHashMap because a LinkedHashMap needs the expense of maintaining the linked list. The LinkedHashMap implements a normal hashtable, but with the added benefit of the keys of the hashtable being stored as a doubly-linked list.
Both of their methods are not synchronized.
Let's take a look their API documentation:
The HashMap is a hash table with buckets in each hash slot.
API documentation:
This implementation provides constant-time performance for the basic
operations (get and put), assuming the hash function disperses the
elements properly among the buckets. Iteration over collection views
requires time proportional to the "capacity" of the HashMap instance
(the number of buckets) plus its size (the number of key-value
mappings). Thus, it's very important not to set the initial capacity
too high (or the load factor too low) if iteration performance is
important.
LinkedHashMap is a linked list implementing the map interface. As
said in the API documentation:
Hash table and linked list implementation of the Map interface, with
predictable iteration order. This implementation differs from HashMap
in that it maintains a doubly-linked list running through all of its
entries. This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is
normally the order in which keys were inserted into the map
(insertion-order).

One way that I have used these at work are for cached backend REST queries. These also have the added benefit of returning the data in the some order for the client. You can read more about it in the oracle docs:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/LinkedHashMap.html
This technique is particularly useful if a module takes a map on input, copies it, and later returns results whose order is determined by that of the copy. (Clients generally appreciate having things returned in the same order they were presented.)
A special constructor is provided to create a linked hash map whose order of iteration is the order in which its entries were last accessed, from least-recently accessed to most-recently (access-order). This kind of map is well-suited to building LRU caches. Invoking the put, putIfAbsent, get, getOrDefault, compute, computeIfAbsent, computeIfPresent, or merge methods results in an access to the corresponding entry (assuming it exists after the invocation completes). The replace methods only result in an access of the entry if the value is replaced. The putAll method generates one entry access for each mapping in the specified map, in the order that key-value mappings are provided by the specified map's entry set iterator. No other methods generate entry accesses. In particular, operations on collection-views do not affect the order of iteration of the backing map.

Java HashMap and underlying values() collection

I was wondering if the Collection view of the values contained in a HashMap is kept ordered when the HashMap changes.
For example if I have a HashMap whose values() method returns L={a, b, c}
What happened to L if I add a new element "d" to the map?
Is it added at the end, i.e. if I iterate through the elements, it's the order kept?
In particular, if the addition of the new element "d" causes a rehash, will the order be kept in L?
Many thanks!

I was wondering if the Collection view of the values contained in a HashMap is kept ordered when the HashMap changes.
No, there is no such guarantee.
If this was the case, then the following program would output and ordered sequence from 1-100
HashMap<Integer, Integer> map = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
map.put(i, i);
System.out.println(map.values());
(and it doesn't).
There is a class that does precisely what you're asking for, and that is LinkedHashMap:
Hash table and linked list implementation of the Map interface, with predictable iteration order. This implementation differs from HashMap in that it maintains a doubly-linked list running through all of its entries. This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is normally the order in which keys were inserted into the map (insertion-order).

If it doesn't say it in the JavaDoc then there are no guarantees about it. Different versions of Java could do different things. Don't depend on undocumented behaviour.
You might want to look at LinkedHashMap.

HashMap in Java aren't ordered, so I think it will be safe to say that values() won't return an ordered Collection.
LinkedHashMap is an ordered version of HashMap (insertion order), but I don't know it values() will return an ordered Collection. I think the best is to try.

Generally they is no guarantee of order when you are using HashMap. It might be in the order in which you add elements for a few elements but it would get reshuffled when there is a possibility of collision and it has to go with a collision resolution strategy.