I'm learning and understanding Java now, and while practising with arrays I had a doubt. I wrote the following code as an example:
class example
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
String a[] = new String[] {"Sam", "Claudia", "Josh", "Toby", "Donna"};
int b[] = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
for(int n=0;n<5;n++)
{
System.out.print (a[n] + "...");
System.out.println (b[n]);
}
System.out.println (" ");
java.util.Arrays.sort(a);
for(int n=0;n<5;n++)
{
System.out.print (a[n] + "...");
System.out.println (b[n]);
}
}
In a nutshell, this class created two arrays with five spaces each. It fills one with names of characters from the West Wing, and fills the other with numbering from one to five. We can say that the data in these two strings corresponds to each other.
Now, the program sorts the array with the names in it using Arrays.sort(). After printing the array again, you can see that while the names are now in alphabetical order, the numbers do not correspond anymore as the second array is unchanged.
How can I shuffle the contents of the second array to match the sort requirements of the first? The solution must also be flexible to allow for changes in the scope and size of the program. Please do not post any answers asking me to change my methodology with the arrays, or propose a more 'efficient' way of doing things. This is for educational purposed and I'd like a straight solution to the example code provided. Thanks in advance!
EDIT: I do NOT want to create an additional class, however I think some form of sorting through nested loops might be an option instead of Arrays.sort().
Below is the code without using any Map Collection, but if you want to use Map then it becomes very easy. Add both the arrays into map and sort it.
public static void main(String args[]) {
String a[] = new String[] {
"Sam", "Claudia", "Josh", "Toby", "Donna"
};
int b[] = new int[] {
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
};
for (int n = 0; n < 5; n++) {
System.out.print(a[n] + "...");
System.out.println(b[n]);
}
System.out.println(" ");
//java.util.Arrays.sort(a);
/* Bubble Sort */
for (int n = 0; n < 5; n++) {
for (int m = 0; m < 4 - n; m++) {
if ((a[m].compareTo(a[m + 1])) > 0) {
String swapString = a[m];
a[m] = a[m + 1];
a[m + 1] = swapString;
int swapInt = b[m];
b[m] = b[m + 1];
b[m + 1] = swapInt;
}
}
}
for (int n = 0; n < 5; n++) {
System.out.print(a[n] + "...");
System.out.println(b[n]);
}
}
Some people propose making a product type. That is feasible only if the amount of elements is small. By introducing another object you add object overhead (30+ bytes) for each element and a performance penalty of a pointer (also worsening cache locality).
Solution without object overhead
Make a third array. Fill it with indices from 0 to size-1. Sort this array with comparator function polling into the array according to which you want to sort.
Finally, reorder the elements in both arrays according to indices.
Alternative solution
Write the sorting algorithm yourself. This is not ideal, because you might make a mistake and the sorting efficiency might be subpar.
You have to ZIP your two arrays into an array which elements are instances of a class like:
class NameNumber
{
public NameNumber(String name, int n) {
this.name = name;
this.number = n;
}
public String name;
public int number;
}
And sort that array with a custom comparator.
Your code should be something like:
NameNumber [] zip = new NameNumber[Math.min(a.length,b.length)];
for(int i = 0; i < zip.length; i++)
{
zip[i] = new NameNumber(a[i],b[i]);
}
Arrays.sort(zip, new Comparator<NameNumber>() {
#Override
public int compare(NameNumber o1, NameNumber o2) {
return Integer.compare(o1.number, o2.number);
}
});
You should not have two parallel arrays. Instead, you should have a single array of WestWingCharacter objects, where each object would have a field name and a field number.
Sorting this array by number of by name would then be a piece of cake:
Collections.sort(characters, new Comparator<WestWingCharacter>() {
#Override
public int compare(WestWingCharacter c1, WestWingCharacter c2) {
return c1.getName().compareTo(c2.getName();
}
});
or, with Java 8:
Collections.sort(characters, Comparator.comparing(WestWingCharacter::getName));
Java is an OO language, and you should thus use objects.
What you want is not possible because you don't know internally how Arrays.sort swap the elements in your String array, so there is no way to swap accordingly the elements in the int array.
You should create a class that contains the String name and the int position as parameter and then sort this class only with the name, providing a custom comparator to Arrays.sort.
If you want to keep your current code (with 2 arrays, but this not the ideal solution), don't use Arrays.sort and implement your own sorting algorithm. When you swap two names, get the index of them and swap the two integers in the other array accordingly.
Here is the answer for your query.
public class Main {
public static void main(String args[]){
String name[] = new String[] {"Sam", "Claudia", "Josh", "Toby", "Donna"};
int id[] = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
for ( int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < n; j++) {
int dtmp=0;
String stmp=null;
if (id[i] > id[j]) {
dtmp = rate[i];
id[i] = id[j];
id[j] = dtmp;
stmp = name[i];
name[i]=name[j];
name[j]=stmp;
}
}
}
System.out.println("Details are :");
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
System.out.println(name[i]+" - "+id[i]);
}
}
}
The same solution, as a function that can be added to some utils class:
public static final boolean INCREASING = true;
public static final boolean DECREASING = false;
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T extends Comparable, U extends Object> void bubbleSort(ArrayList<T> list1, ArrayList<U>list2, boolean order) {
int cmpResult = (order ? 1 : -1);
for (int i = 0; i < list1.size() - 1; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
if (list1.get(j).compareTo(list1.get(j+1)) == cmpResult) {
T tempComparable = list1.get(j);
list1.set(j , list1.get(j + 1));
list1.set(j + 1 , tempComparable);
U tempObject = list2.get(j);
list2.set(j , list2.get(j + 1));
list2.set(j + 1 , tempObject);
}
}
}
}
The arrays are not linked in any way. Like someone pointed out take a look at
SortedMap http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/SortedMap.html
TreeMap http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/TreeMap.html
import java.util.*;
class mergeArrays2
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
String a1[]={"Sam", "Claudia", "Josh", "Toby", "Donna"};
Integer a2[]={11, 2, 31, 24, 5};
ArrayList ar1=new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(a1));
Collections.sort(ar1);
ArrayList ar2=new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(a2));
Collections.sort(ar2);
System.out.println("array list"+ar1+ " "+ar2);
}
}
While implementing improvements to quicksort partitioning,I tried to use Tukey's ninther to find the pivot (borrowing almost everything from sedgewick's implementation in QuickX.java)
My code below gives different results each time the array of integers is shuffled.
import java.util.Random;
public class TukeysNintherDemo{
public static int tukeysNinther(Comparable[] a,int lo,int hi){
int N = hi - lo + 1;
int mid = lo + N/2;
int delta = N/8;
int m1 = median3a(a,lo,lo+delta,lo+2*delta);
int m2 = median3a(a,mid-delta,mid,mid+delta);
int m3 = median3a(a,hi-2*delta,hi-delta,hi);
int tn = median3a(a,m1,m2,m3);
return tn;
}
// return the index of the median element among a[i], a[j], and a[k]
private static int median3a(Comparable[] a, int i, int j, int k) {
return (less(a[i], a[j]) ?
(less(a[j], a[k]) ? j : less(a[i], a[k]) ? k : i) :
(less(a[k], a[j]) ? j : less(a[k], a[i]) ? k : i));
}
private static boolean less(Comparable x,Comparable y){
return x.compareTo(y) < 0;
}
public static void shuffle(Object[] a) {
Random random = new Random(System.currentTimeMillis());
int N = a.length;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
int r = i + random.nextInt(N-i); // between i and N-1
Object temp = a[i];
a[i] = a[r];
a[r] = temp;
}
}
public static void show(Comparable[] a){
int N = a.length;
if(N > 20){
System.out.format("a[0]= %d\n", a[0]);
System.out.format("a[%d]= %d\n",N-1, a[N-1]);
}else{
for(int i=0;i<N;i++){
System.out.print(a[i]+",");
}
}
System.out.println();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] a = new Integer[]{17,15,14,13,19,12,11,16,18};
System.out.print("data= ");
show(a);
int tn = tukeysNinther(a,0,a.length-1);
System.out.println("ninther="+a[tn]);
}
}
Running this a cuople of times gives
data= 11,14,12,16,18,19,17,15,13,
ninther=15
data= 14,13,17,16,18,19,11,15,12,
ninther=14
data= 16,17,12,19,18,13,14,11,15,
ninther=16
Will tuckey's ninther give different values for different shufflings of the same dataset? when I tried to find the median of medians by hand ,I found that the above calculations in the code are correct.. which means that the same dataset yield different results unlike a median of the dataset.Is this the proper behaviour? Can someone with more knowledge in statistics comment?
Tukey's ninther examines 9 items and calculates the median using only those.
For different random shuffles, you may very well get a different Tukey's ninther, because different items may be examined. After all, you always examine the same array slots, but a different shuffle may have put different items in those slots.
The key here is that Tukey's ninther is not the median of the given array. It is an attempted appromixation of the median, made with very little effort: we only have to read 9 items and make 12 comparisons to get it. This is much faster than getting the actual median, and has a smaller chance of resulting in an undesirable pivot compared to the 'median of three'. Note that the chance still exists.
Does this answer you question?
On a side note, does anybody know if quicksort using Tukey's ninther still requires shuffling? I'm assuming yes, but I'm not certain.
I have written some code for sorting random integers that a user inputted. How would I switch this into sorting randomly inputted letters? Aka, user inputs j, s, g, w, and the programs outputs g, j, s, w?
for (int i = 0; i < random.length; i++) { //"random" is array with stored integers
// Assume first value is x
x = i;
for (int j = i + 1; j < random.length; j++) {
//find smallest value in array (random)
if (random[j] < random[x]) {
x = j;
}
}
if (x != i) {
//swap the values if not in correct order
final int temp = random[i];
random[i] = random[x];
random[x] = temp;
}
itsATextArea.append(random[i] + "\n");// Output ascending order
}
Originally I hoped (though I knew the chances of me being right were against me) that replacing all the 'int' with 'String' would work...naturally I was wrong and realized perhaps I had to list out what letter came before which by using lists such as list.add("a"); etc.
I apologize if this seems like I am asking you guys to do all the work (which I'm not) but I'm not entirely sure how to start going about this, so if anyone can give some hints or tips, that would be most appreciated!
You could use String.compareTo() to do that:
Change this:
int[] random = new int[sizeyouhad];
...
if (random[j] < random[x]) {
...
final int temp = random[i];
to:
String[] random = new String[sizeyouhad];
...
if (random[j].compareTo(random[x]) < 0) {
...
final String temp = random[i];
Trial with your code:
String[] random = new String[3];
random[0] = "b";
random[1] = "c";
random[2] = "a";
int x = 0;
//"random" is array with stored integers
for (int i = 0; i < random.length; i++) {
// Assume first value is x
x = i;
for (int j = i + 1; j < random.length; j++) {
//find smallest value in array (random)
if (random[j].compareTo(random[x]) < 0) {
x = j;
}
}
if (x != i) {
//swap the values if not in correct order
final String temp = random[i];
random[i] = random[x];
random[x] = temp;
}
System.out.println(random[i] + "\n");// Output ascending order
}
If you're just trying to sort a list of strings you should probably use the java.util.Collections.sort method rather than writing your own sorting routine.
Was random originally int[]? If you had changed this to String[], you can use String#compareTo method to discern if one string is "less than" another.
Incidentally, you can change the type of random to Comparable[] and then you can use the same algorithm to sort any object whose class implements the interface!
Try to use Collections.sort() function
List<String> l = Arrays.asList("j","s", "g","w");
Collections.sort(l);
If you consider every character to be a code point[1] and you want to sort by Unicode code point order[2], then there is really no need to change your logic. The work is converting from whatever input you are given (String, char[], etc.) into an int[] of the code points.
[1] - http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/String.html#codePointAt(int)
[2] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_point
You can make your code work on any type of Object by using generics.
The following code is very simple and works perfectly (With this library you can solve your problem in few lines):
import static ch.lambdaj.Lambda.sort;
import static ch.lambdaj.Lambda.on;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
public class Test{
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<String> list = Arrays.asList("1","102","-50","54","ABS");
List<String> newList = sort(list, on(String.class));
System.out.println(newList);//[-50, 1, 102, 54, ABS]
}
}
This code uses lambda library (download here, website). Find in the website this example:
List<Person> sorted = sort(persons, on(Person.class).getAge());
I'm having a problem finding the sum of all of the integers in an array in Java. I cannot find any useful method in the Math class for this.
In java-8 you can use streams:
int[] a = {10,20,30,40,50};
int sum = IntStream.of(a).sum();
System.out.println("The sum is " + sum);
Output:
The sum is 150.
It's in the package java.util.stream
import java.util.stream.*;
If you're using Java 8, the Arrays class provides a stream(int[] array) method which returns a sequential IntStream with the specified int array. It has also been overloaded for double and long arrays.
int [] arr = {1,2,3,4};
int sum = Arrays.stream(arr).sum(); //prints 10
It also provides a method
stream(int[] array, int startInclusive, int endExclusive) which permits you to take a specified range of the array (which can be useful) :
int sum = Arrays.stream(new int []{1,2,3,4}, 0, 2).sum(); //prints 3
Finally, it can take an array of type T. So you can per example have a String which contains numbers as an input and if you want to sum them just do :
int sum = Arrays.stream("1 2 3 4".split("\\s+")).mapToInt(Integer::parseInt).sum();
This is one of those simple things that doesn't (AFAIK) exist in the standard Java API. It's easy enough to write your own.
Other answers are perfectly fine, but here's one with some for-each syntactic sugar.
int someArray[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
int sum = 0;
for (int i : someArray)
sum += i;
Also, an example of array summation is even shown in the Java 7 Language Specification. The example is from Section 10.4 - Array Access.
class Gauss {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] ia = new int[101];
for (int i = 0; i < ia.length; i++) ia[i] = i;
int sum = 0;
for (int e : ia) sum += e;
System.out.println(sum);
}
}
You can't. Other languages have some methods for this like array_sum() in PHP, but Java doesn't.
Just..
int[] numbers = {1,2,3,4};
int sum = 0;
for( int i : numbers) {
sum += i;
}
System.out.println(sum);
In Apache Math : There is StatUtils.sum(double[] arr)
The only point I would add to previous solutions is that I would use a long to accumulate the total to avoid any overflow of value.
int[] someArray = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Integer.MAX_VALUE};
long sum = 0;
for (int i : someArray)
sum += i;
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < yourArray.length; i++)
{
sum = sum + yourArray[i];
}
In Java 8
Code:
int[] array = new int[]{1,2,3,4,5};
int sum = IntStream.of(array).reduce( 0,(a, b) -> a + b);
System.out.println("The summation of array is " + sum);
System.out.println("Another way to find summation :" + IntStream.of(array).sum());
Output:
The summation of array is 15
Another way to find summation :15
Explanation:
In Java 8, you can use reduction concept to do your addition.
Read all about Reduction
A bit surprised to see None of the above answers considers it can be multiple times faster using a thread pool. Here, parallel uses a fork-join thread pool and automatically break the stream in multiple parts and run them parallel and then merge. If you just remember the following line of code you can use it many places.
So the award for the fastest short and sweet code goes to -
int[] nums = {1,2,3};
int sum = Arrays.stream(nums).parallel().reduce(0, (a,b)-> a+b);
Lets say you want to do sum of squares , then Arrays.stream(nums).parallel().map(x->x*x).reduce(0, (a,b)-> a+b). Idea is you can still perform reduce , without map .
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
sum += myArray[i];
}
IMHO a sum function would seem a good fit to extend the Arrays class where fill, sort, search, copy, & equals live. There are a lot of handy methods hiding in the javadocs so it is a fair question when porting Fortran to java to ask before rolling our own helper method. Search through the huge javadoc index for "sum", "add" and any other keyword you might think of. You might suspect certainly someone has already done this for primitive types int, float, double, Integer, Float, Double? No matter how simple, it is always good to check. Keep the code as simple as possible and don't reinvent the wheel.
It depends. How many numbers are you adding? Testing many of the above suggestions:
import java.text.NumberFormat;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Locale;
public class Main {
public static final NumberFormat FORMAT = NumberFormat.getInstance(Locale.US);
public static long sumParallel(int[] array) {
final long start = System.nanoTime();
int sum = Arrays.stream(array).parallel().reduce(0,(a,b)-> a + b);
final long end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(sum);
return end - start;
}
public static long sumStream(int[] array) {
final long start = System.nanoTime();
int sum = Arrays.stream(array).reduce(0,(a,b)-> a + b);
final long end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(sum);
return end - start;
}
public static long sumLoop(int[] array) {
final long start = System.nanoTime();
int sum = 0;
for (int v: array) {
sum += v;
}
final long end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(sum);
return end - start;
}
public static long sumArray(int[] array) {
final long start = System.nanoTime();
int sum = Arrays.stream(array) .sum();
final long end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(sum);
return end - start;
}
public static long sumStat(int[] array) {
final long start = System.nanoTime();
int sum = 0;
final long end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(sum);
return end - start;
}
public static void test(int[] nums) {
System.out.println("------");
System.out.println(FORMAT.format(nums.length) + " numbers");
long p = sumParallel(nums);
System.out.println("parallel " + FORMAT.format(p));
long s = sumStream(nums);
System.out.println("stream " + FORMAT.format(s));
long ar = sumArray(nums);
System.out.println("arrays " + FORMAT.format(ar));
long lp = sumLoop(nums);
System.out.println("loop " + FORMAT.format(lp));
}
public static void testNumbers(int howmany) {
int[] nums = new int[howmany];
for (int i =0; i < nums.length;i++) {
nums[i] = (i + 1)%100;
}
test(nums);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
testNumbers(3);
testNumbers(300);
testNumbers(3000);
testNumbers(30000);
testNumbers(300000);
testNumbers(3000000);
testNumbers(30000000);
testNumbers(300000000);
}
}
I found, using an 8 core, 16 G Ubuntu18 machine, the loop was fastest for smaller values and the parallel for larger. But of course it would depend on the hardware you're running:
------
3 numbers
6
parallel 4,575,234
6
stream 209,849
6
arrays 251,173
6
loop 576
------
300 numbers
14850
parallel 671,428
14850
stream 73,469
14850
arrays 71,207
14850
loop 4,958
------
3,000 numbers
148500
parallel 393,112
148500
stream 306,240
148500
arrays 335,795
148500
loop 47,804
------
30,000 numbers
1485000
parallel 794,223
1485000
stream 1,046,927
1485000
arrays 366,400
1485000
loop 459,456
------
300,000 numbers
14850000
parallel 4,715,590
14850000
stream 1,369,509
14850000
arrays 1,296,287
14850000
loop 1,327,592
------
3,000,000 numbers
148500000
parallel 3,996,803
148500000
stream 13,426,933
148500000
arrays 13,228,364
148500000
loop 1,137,424
------
30,000,000 numbers
1485000000
parallel 32,894,414
1485000000
stream 131,924,691
1485000000
arrays 131,689,921
1485000000
loop 9,607,527
------
300,000,000 numbers
1965098112
parallel 338,552,816
1965098112
stream 1,318,649,742
1965098112
arrays 1,308,043,340
1965098112
loop 98,986,436
I like this method personally. My code style is a little weird.
public static int sumOf(int... integers) {
int total = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < integers.length; total += integers[i++]);
return total;
}
Pretty easy to use in code:
int[] numbers = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
sumOf(1);
sumOf(1, 2, 3);
sumOf(numbers);
I use this:
public static long sum(int[] i_arr)
{
long sum;
int i;
for(sum= 0, i= i_arr.length - 1; 0 <= i; sum+= i_arr[i--]);
return sum;
}
You have to roll your own.
You start with a total of 0. Then you consider for every integer in the array, add it to a total. Then when you're out of integers, you have the sum.
If there were no integers, then the total is 0.
There are two things to learn from this exercise :
You need to iterate through the elements of the array somehow - you can do this with a for loop or a while loop.
You need to store the result of the summation in an accumulator. For this, you need to create a variable.
int accumulator = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++) {
accumulator += myArray[i];
}
You can make your code look better like this:
public void someMethod(){
List<Integer> numbers = new ArrayList<Integer>();
numbers.addAll(db.findNumbers());
...
System.out.println("Result is " + sumOfNumbers(numbers));
}
private int sumOfNumbers(List<Integer> numbers){
int sum = 0;
for (Integer i : numbers){
sum += i;
}
return sum;
}
Use below logic:
static int sum()
{
int sum = 0; // initialize sum
int i;
// Iterate through all elements summing them up
for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
sum += arr[i];
return sum;
}
I have the right solution for your problem if you specifically have an array of type double, then this method can be used to calculate the sum of its elements. also, it using math class
import org.apache.commons.math3.stat.StatUtils;
public class ArraySum {
public static void main(String[] args) {
double[] array = { 10, 4, 17, 33, -2, 14 };
int sum = (int)StatUtils.sum(array);
System.out.println("Sum of array elements is: " + sum);
}
}
There is a sum() method in underscore-java library.
Code example:
import com.github.underscore.U;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int sum = U.sum(java.util.Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4));
System.out.println(sum);
// -> 10
}
}
There is no 'method in a math class' for such thing. Its not like its a square root function or something like that.
You just need to have a variable for the sum and loop through the array adding each value you find to the sum.
class Addition {
public static void main() {
int arr[]={5,10,15,20,25,30}; //Declaration and Initialization of an Array
int sum=0; //To find the sum of array elements
for(int i:arr) {
sum += i;
}
System.out.println("The sum is :"+sum);//To display the sum
}
}
We may use user defined function. At first initialize sum variable equal to zero. Then traverse the array and add element with sum . Then update the sum variable.
Code Snippet :
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.io.*;
class Sum
{
public static int sum(int arr[])
{
int sum=0;
for(int i=0; i<arr.length; i++)
{
sum += arr[i];
}
return sum;
}
public static void main (String[] args)
{
int arr[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int total = sum(arr);
System.out.printf("%d", total);
}
}
/**
* Sum of all elements from 1 to 1000
*/
final int sum = Stream.iterate(1, n -> n + 1).limit(1000).mapToInt(el -> el).sum();
Most of the answers here are using inbuilt functions-
Here is my answer if you want to know the whole logic behind this ques:
import java.util.*;
public class SumOfArray {
public static void main(String[] args){
Scanner inp = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = inp.nextInt();
int[] arr = new int[n];
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++){
arr[i] = inp.nextInt();
}
System.out.println("The sum of the array is :" + sum(arr));
}
static int sum(int[] arr){
int sum = 0;
for (int a = 0; a < arr.length; a++){
sum = sum + arr[a];
}
return sum;
}
}
public class Num1
{
public static void main ()
{
//Declaration and Initialization
int a[]={10,20,30,40,50}
//To find the sum of array elements
int sum=0;
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
sum=sum+i;
}
//To display the sum
System.out.println("The sum is :"+sum);
}
}
public class AddDemo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ArrayList <Integer>A = new ArrayList<Integer>();
Scanner S = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println("Enter the Numbers: ");
for(int i=0; i<5; i++){
A.add(S.nextInt());
}
System.out.println("You have entered: "+A);
int Sum = 0;
for(int i=0; i<A.size(); i++){
Sum = Sum + A.get(i);
}
System.out.println("The Sum of Entered List is: "+Sum);
}
}
As of Java 8 The use of lambda expressions have become available.
See this:
int[] nums = /** Your Array **/;
Compact:
int sum = 0;
Arrays.asList(nums).stream().forEach(each -> {
sum += each;
});
Prefer:
int sum = 0;
ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int each : nums) { //refer back to original array
list.add(each); //there are faster operations…
}
list.stream().forEach(each -> {
sum += each;
});
Return or print sum.