Hello guys I am doing a thread to update a ball over JFrame so I repaint the screen... and then paint the ball update its position .. and then draw the screen again ... draw the ball and the same cycle ... here is the code
private void jButton3ActionPerformed(java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {
Thread t = new Thread()
{
public void run()
{
while(true)
{
repaint();
b2.update(ob,2);
b2.paint(ob.getGraphics());
b2.setT(b2.getT() + 1);
try {
Thread.sleep(50);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
System.out.println("Error in Sleeping");
}
}
}
};
t.start();
}
but the problem is that I don't see the ball... the paint of the screen always overrides the ball and the ball is like down under the Jframe ..
If you want to have animations in Swing, the recommended class to use is the javax.swing.Timer . This class allows you to perform operations on the Event Dispatch Thread at regular intervals.
The Swing Timer tutorial
An animation example posted here on SO (which is linked in the Swing wiki here on SO btw)
Some General Rules
Swing is not thread safe, you should only ever update UI components from within the context of the Event Dispatching Thread.
You do not control the paint process, the repaint manager does. You can request updates to occur by calling repaint, but you should never call update and paint directly when trying to update the display.
The Graphics context used by the paint sub system is a shared resource and is not guaranteed to be the same between paint cycles, you should never maintain a reference to it. You should also not rely on the results from JComponent#getGraphics this method is capable of returning null.
An Example Solution
You have a number of options, depending on what you want to ultimately achieve.
You could use a SwingWorker, but given the fact that all your going to is enter an infinite loop and it would easier to use SwingUtilities#invokeLater then actually use the publish method, this approach would actually be more work.
You could also use a Thread, but you'd end up with the same problems as using a SwingWorker
The simpliset solution, for what you're presented, is actually a javax.swing.Timer
public class Blinky {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Blinky();
}
public Blinky() {
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
try {
UIManager.setLookAndFeel(UIManager.getSystemLookAndFeelClassName());
} catch (ClassNotFoundException | InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException | UnsupportedLookAndFeelException ex) {
}
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Test");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.setLayout(new BorderLayout());
frame.add(new BlinkyPane());
frame.pack();
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
frame.setVisible(true);
}
});
}
protected class BlinkyPane extends JPanel {
private JLabel blinkyLabel;
private boolean blink = false;
public BlinkyPane() {
setLayout(new GridBagLayout());
blinkyLabel = new JLabel("I'm blinking here");
blinkyLabel.setBackground(Color.RED);
add(blinkyLabel);
Timer timer = new Timer(250, new ActionListener() {
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
blink = !blink;
if (blink) {
blinkyLabel.setForeground(Color.YELLOW);
} else {
blinkyLabel.setForeground(Color.BLACK);
}
blinkyLabel.setOpaque(blink);
repaint();
}
});
timer.setRepeats(true);
timer.setCoalesce(true);
timer.start();
}
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return new Dimension(200, 100);
}
}
}
You can take a look at Swing Timer and Concurrency in Swing for more info
If you access GUI components outside the EDT (Event Dispatch Thread) then you might encounter strange problems, Contrary if you perform long running tasks in the EDT then also you will get problems.
Check this post for more info on GUI Threading in Java
Related
I have been trying this all day in different variations with little success. Could someone please help explain what I am doing wrong? I am just a beginner with regards to threads.
private JTextArea text = new JTextArea();
private JButton button = new JButton("Cancel");
public StatusFrame() {
text.setEditable(false);
this.add(text);
this.add(button, BorderLayout.EAST);
this.setSize(new Dimension(150, 100));
this.setVisible(true);
}
public void updateStatus(String textIn) {
text.setText(textIn);
}
public JButton getButton() {
return button;
}
In another class, I am calling methods which may take a while to complete. I want to be able to call the StatusFrame.updateStatus() method to keep the user informed on the progress.
This is what I have:
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
final Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
//do something
status.update("process 1 completed");
//do something else
status.updateStatus("Process 2 completed");
}
The frame appears but none of the code after the runnable appears to be run/processed. It just stops/blocks/something. But the GUI remains active
Thanks for any advice.
P.S.: I have tried using invokeAndWait() method but again not sure if I am doing it the right way. For now a quick fix would be preferred as I have not learned much about threads yet. Any instructions are welcome.
You have the concepts backwards.
Here's your code
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
final Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
//do something
status.update("process 1 completed");
//do something else
status.updateStatus("Process 2 completed");
You should execute the long running code in a thread, and use the SwingUtilities invokeLater method to update the GUI.
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
final Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
new Thread(r).start();
// inside the StatusFrame
//do something
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
update("process 1 completed");
}
);
//do something else sometime later
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
update("Process 2 completed");
}
);
I don't know if I was clear in my answer.
Execute SwingUtilities.invokeLater when you start your Java application to make sure Swing components are on the Event Dispatch thread (EDT).
From the EDT, invoke long running processes as a runnable thread.
In the runnable thread, since you're not on the EDT, execute SwingUtilities.invokeLater whenever you're updating Swing components. This ensures that Swing components are updated on the EDT.
Every Swing application should start with a class like this:
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
import com.ggl.text.entry.model.TextEntryModel;
import com.ggl.text.entry.view.TextEntryFrame;
public class TextEntry implements Runnable {
#Override
public void run() {
new TextEntryFrame(new TextEntryModel());
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new TextEntry());
}
}
This class does 3 things.
Constructs the GUI data model.
Constructs the GUI JFrame.
Ensures that the Swing components are on the EDT.
You'll need to call the updates on EDT too. I would suggest to sleep on the main thread, to give GUI a chance to show up before any other work:
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
try {
Thread.sleep(10);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
//do something
r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status.update("process 1 completed");
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
//do something else
r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status.update("Process 2 completed");
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
}
See Concurrency in Swing.
You may find using a Swing Worker easier to work with since it uses a Thread and has methods that will allow you to update the GUI properly.
I have a program that need to update the content of JList, which is DefaultListModel on another thread. Since the number of contents may change from time to time, so I just clear all content and add new content into DefaultListModel when updating. But seems I ran into an issue that JFrame starts refreshing while my thread is doing update. I got exceptions like this
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0"
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3
Here is an example of the code
DefaultListModel model;
JList jList;
JScrollPane jScrollPane;
Thread thread;
public Frame() {
this.setTitle("ASM_SIMULATOR");
this.setBounds(100, 100, 500, 500);
this.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
this.getContentPane().setLayout(null);
model = new DefaultListModel();
jList = new JList(model);
jScrollPane = new JScrollPane(jList);
jList.setBounds(50, 50, 300, 200);
jScrollPane.setBounds(50, 50, 300, 200);
this.getContentPane().add(jScrollPane);
this.setVisible(true);
thread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
makeData();
try {
Thread.sleep(200);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
});
thread.start();
}
public void makeData() {
System.out.println("makeData()");
model.clear();
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
model.addElement((int) (Math.random() * 100));
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Frame();
}
You violate the basic "all Swing component should be accessed/modified on the Event Dispatch Thread (=EDT), and on the EDT only" twice in that code snippet.
Your main method should wrap the new Frame() call in an SwingUtilities#invokeLater or some similar method
Your model-update thread changes the model on a background thread. Updating the model will fire events which are received by the JList, on which the JList updates itself (again, on the wrong thread).
Two possible solutions:
create a new DefaultListModel on your background thread, and replace it in one go on the EDT.
keep updating the existing model, but make sure the updates happen on the EDT.
The basic answer is don't
Swing is not thread safe.
What you need to do is either use a SwingWorker to build the model and use its done/process method to apply it back to the view or use SwingUtilities.invokeLater to continue using your thread, but sync updates back to the Event Dispatching Thread
Have a read through Concurrency in Swing for details
you have issue with Concurrency in Swing
have to wrap model.addElement((int) (Math.random() * 100)); into invokeLater
correct way could be start workers Thread from Runnable#Thread, or use SwingWorker
output from SwingWorkers methods publish() and process() could be doen on EDT
Unfortunately it's not that simple. Only the GUI thread should be allowed to update the GUI, so any other thread needs to forward any updates to the GUI thread via SwingUtilities.InvokeLater. In your case you can probably just wrap the entire makeData method, since all it does is update the GUI:
thread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
SwingUtilities.InvokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
makeData();
}
});
try {
Thread.sleep(200);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
});
Note that now the code of makeData will execute on the GUI thread. In other cases when you're doing other time-consuming work that does not involve the GUI you should use InvokeLater in a more fine-grain manner to keep the UI thread as free as possible.
Edit: Looking more carefully at your code, I noticed that all you're doing is a timed update of the GUI every 200 ms. You can do this much easier with javax.swing.Timer:
int delay = 200; //milliseconds
ActionListener taskPerformer = new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent evt) {
makeData();
}
};
new Timer(delay, taskPerformer).start();
I have a Frame that is all one color, but has some text in the corner. I set the color, actually read the color from the monitor, and then do some computations based on those measurements.
The problem is, calling repaint() causes the Frame to be painted after I do the measurements. I'm assuming this is due to repaint() delegating to the EDT, but I'm getting incorrect results due to the measurements occurring before/during the actual painting work.
My initial thought was to put a listener on paint completion, but I repaint to update the text much more frequently than I do for the color and I don't want to listen to those events. How can I wait for the actual painting task to finish before taking my measurement?
Amazing what you can find...
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().addAWTEventListener(new AWTEventListener() {
#Override
public void eventDispatched(AWTEvent event) {
PaintEvent pe = (PaintEvent) event;
String type = "";
if (pe.getID() == PaintEvent.PAINT) {
type = "PAINT";
} else if (pe.getID() == PaintEvent.PAINT_FIRST) {
type = "PAINT_FIRST";
} else if (pe.getID() == PaintEvent.PAINT_LAST) {
type = "PAINT_LAST";
} else if (pe.getID() == PaintEvent.UPDATE) {
type = "UPDATE";
}
System.out.println(type + "; pe.UpdateRec = " + pe.getUpdateRect() + "; pe.component = " + pe.getComponent());
}
}, AWTEvent.PAINT_EVENT_MASK);
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Testing");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.setSize(200, 200);
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
frame.setVisible(true);
}
});
Now, because repaint requests can come think and fast, I'd be tempted to place a small "delay" in that would fired shortly after the last request has completed...
private Timer updateTimer;
// ...
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
updateTimer = new Timer(250, new ActionListener() {
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
// Update compulations here...
}
});
updateTimer.setRepeats(false);
updateTimer.setCoalesce(true);
Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().addAWTEventListener(new AWTEventListener() {
#Override
public void eventDispatched(AWTEvent event) {
updateTimer.restart();
}
}, AWTEvent.PAINT_EVENT_MASK);
}
}
The idea is to allow at least 250 milliseconds between the last repaint request and the start of your compilations. You might like to play around with these values a bit and see what suits you...
UPDATE
You could also try JComponent.paintImmediately
Paints the specified region in this component and all of its
descendants that overlap the region, immediately.
It's rarely necessary to call this method. In most cases it's more
efficient to call repaint, which defers the actual painting and can
collapse redundant requests into a single paint call. This method is
useful if one needs to update the display while the current event is
being dispatched.
I know this is an old thread, but in case someone is searching for an answer to this, SwingUtilities has a method called invokeAndWait(Runnable) that runs the task on AWT dispatching thread synchronously with your current thread. Note that this cannot be done if you need it to be done inside the Event dispatching thread.
I want to cause the "main thread" (the thread started which runs main()) to do some work from the actionPerformed() method of a button's ActionListener, but I do not know how to achieve this.
A little more context:
I am currently programming a 2D game using Swing (a flavour of Tetris).
When the application starts, a window opens which displays the main menu of the game.
The user is presented several possibilities, one of them is to start the game by pushing a "Start" button, which causes the game panel to be displayed and triggers the main loop of the game.
To be able to switch between the two panels (that of the main menu and that of the game), I am using a CardLayout manager, then I can display one panel by calling show().
The idea is that I would like my start button to have a listener that looks like this:
public class StartListener implements ActionListener {
StartListener() {}
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
displayGamePanel();
startGame();
}
}
but this does not work because actionPerformed() is called from the event-dispatch thread, so the call to startGame() (which triggers the main loop: game logic update + repaint() call at each frame) blocks the whole thread.
The way I am handling this right now is that actionPerformed() just changes a boolean flag value: public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
startPushed = true;
}
which is then eventually checked by the main thread:
while (true) {
while (!g.startPushed) {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
} catch (Exception e) {}
}
g.startPushed = false;
g.startGame();
}
But I find this solution to be very inelegant.
I have read the Concurrency in Swing lesson but I am still confused (should I implement a Worker Thread – isn't that a little overkill?). I haven't done any actual multithreading work yet so I am a little lost.
Isn't there a way to tell the main thread (which would be sleeping indefinitely, waiting for a user action) "ok, wake up now and do this (display the game panel and start the game)"?.
Thanks for your help.
EDIT:
Just to be clear, this is what my game loop looks like:
long lastLoopTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
long dTime;
int delay = 10;
while (running) {
// compute the time that has gone since the last frame
dTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - lastLoopTime;
lastLoopTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
// UPDATE STATE
updateState(dTime);
//...
// UPDATE GRAPHICS
// thread-safe: repaint() will run on the EDT
frame.repaint()
// Pause for a bit
try {
Thread.sleep(delay);
} catch (Exception e) {}
}
This doesn't make sense:
but this does not work because actionPerformed() is called from the event-dispatch thread, so the call to startGame() (which triggers the main loop: game logic update + repaint() call at each frame) blocks the whole thread.
Since your game loop should not block the EDT. Are you using a Swing Timer or a background thread for your game loop? If not, do so.
Regarding:
while (true) {
while (!g.startPushed) {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
} catch (Exception e) {}
}
g.startPushed = false;
g.startGame();
}
Don't do this either, but instead use listeners for this sort of thing.
e.g.,
import java.awt.CardLayout;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.Graphics;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
import javax.swing.*;
public class GameState extends JPanel {
private CardLayout cardlayout = new CardLayout();
private GamePanel gamePanel = new GamePanel();
private StartPanel startpanel = new StartPanel(this, gamePanel);
public GameState() {
setLayout(cardlayout);
add(startpanel, StartPanel.DISPLAY_STRING);
add(gamePanel, GamePanel.DISPLAY_STRING);
}
public void showComponent(String displayString) {
cardlayout.show(this, displayString);
}
private static void createAndShowGui() {
GameState mainPanel = new GameState();
JFrame frame = new JFrame("GameState");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.getContentPane().add(mainPanel);
frame.pack();
frame.setLocationByPlatform(true);
frame.setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
createAndShowGui();
}
});
}
}
class StartPanel extends JPanel {
public static final String DISPLAY_STRING = "Start Panel";
public StartPanel(final GameState gameState, final GamePanel gamePanel) {
add(new JButton(new AbstractAction("Start") {
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
gameState.showComponent(GamePanel.DISPLAY_STRING);
gamePanel.startAnimation();
}
}));
}
}
class GamePanel extends JPanel {
public static final String DISPLAY_STRING = "Game Panel";
private static final int PREF_W = 500;
private static final int PREF_H = 400;
private static final int RECT_WIDTH = 10;
private int x;
private int y;
public void startAnimation() {
x = 0;
y = 0;
int timerDelay = 10;
new Timer(timerDelay , new ActionListener() {
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
x++;
y++;
repaint();
}
}).start();
}
#Override
protected void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
super.paintComponent(g);
g.fillRect(x, y, RECT_WIDTH, RECT_WIDTH);
}
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return new Dimension(PREF_W, PREF_H);
}
}
you should be using a SwingWorker this will execute the code in doInBackground() in a background thread and the code in done() in the EDT after doInBackground() stops
The easiest way: use a CountDownLatch. You set it to 1, make it available in the Swing code by any means appropriate, and in the main thread you await it.
You can consider showing a modal dialog with the game panel using SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait() so that when the dialog is closed the control returns back to main thread.
You can make all code except the EDT run on single thread execution service and then just post runnables whenever you need some code executed.
What is the proper way to terminate a Swing application from the code, and what are the pitfalls?
I'd tried to close my application automatically after a timer fires. But just calling dispose() on the JFrame didn't do the trick - the window vanished but the application did not terminate. However when closing the window with the close button, the application does terminate. What should I do?
Your JFrame default close action can be set to "DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE" instead of EXIT_ON_CLOSE (why people keep using EXIT_ON_CLOSE is beyond me).
If you have any undisposed windows or non-daemon threads, your application will not terminate. This should be considered a error (and solving it with System.exit is a very bad idea).
The most common culprits are java.util.Timer and a custom Thread you've created. Both should be set to daemon or must be explicitly killed.
If you want to check for all active frames, you can use Frame.getFrames(). If all Windows/Frames are disposed of, then use a debugger to check for any non-daemon threads that are still running.
I guess a EXIT_ON_CLOSE
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
before System.exit(0) is better since you can write a Window Listener to make some cleaning operations before actually leaving the app.
That window listener allows you to defined:
public void windowClosing(WindowEvent e) {
displayMessage("WindowListener method called: windowClosing.");
//A pause so user can see the message before
//the window actually closes.
ActionListener task = new ActionListener() {
boolean alreadyDisposed = false;
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
if (frame.isDisplayable()) {
alreadyDisposed = true;
frame.dispose();
}
}
};
Timer timer = new Timer(500, task); //fire every half second
timer.setInitialDelay(2000); //first delay 2 seconds
timer.setRepeats(false);
timer.start();
}
public void windowClosed(WindowEvent e) {
//This will only be seen on standard output.
displayMessage("WindowListener method called: windowClosed.");
}
Try:
System.exit(0);
Crude, but effective.
May be the safe way is something like:
private JButton btnExit;
...
btnExit = new JButton("Quit");
btnExit.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e){
Container frame = btnExit.getParent();
do
frame = frame.getParent();
while (!(frame instanceof JFrame));
((JFrame) frame).dispose();
}
});
The following program includes code that will terminate a program lacking extraneous threads without explicitly calling System.exit(). In order to apply this example to applications using threads/listeners/timers/etc, one need only insert cleanup code requesting (and, if applicable, awaiting) their termination before the WindowEvent is manually initiated within actionPerformed().
For those who wish to copy/paste code capable of running exactly as shown, a slightly-ugly but otherwise irrelevant main method is included at the end.
public class CloseExample extends JFrame implements ActionListener {
private JButton turnOffButton;
private void addStuff() {
setDefaultCloseOperation(DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE);
turnOffButton = new JButton("Exit");
turnOffButton.addActionListener(this);
this.add(turnOffButton);
}
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent quitEvent) {
/* Iterate through and close all timers, threads, etc here */
this.processWindowEvent(
new WindowEvent(
this, WindowEvent.WINDOW_CLOSING));
}
public CloseExample() {
super("Close Me!");
addStuff();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
java.awt.EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
CloseExample cTW = new CloseExample();
cTW.setSize(200, 100);
cTW.setLocation(300,300);
cTW.setVisible(true);
}
});
}
}
If I understand you correctly you want to close the application even if the user did not click on the close button. You will need to register WindowEvents maybe with addWindowListener() or enableEvents() whichever suits your needs better.
You can then invoke the event with a call to processWindowEvent(). Here is a sample code that will create a JFrame, wait 5 seconds and close the JFrame without user interaction.
import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
public class ClosingFrame extends JFrame implements WindowListener{
public ClosingFrame(){
super("A Frame");
setSize(400, 400);
//in case the user closes the window
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
setVisible(true);
//enables Window Events on this Component
this.addWindowListener(this);
//start a timer
Thread t = new Timer();
t.start();
}
public void windowOpened(WindowEvent e){}
public void windowClosing(WindowEvent e){}
//the event that we are interested in
public void windowClosed(WindowEvent e){
System.exit(0);
}
public void windowIconified(WindowEvent e){}
public void windowDeiconified(WindowEvent e){}
public void windowActivated(WindowEvent e){}
public void windowDeactivated(WindowEvent e){}
//a simple timer
class Timer extends Thread{
int time = 10;
public void run(){
while(time-- > 0){
System.out.println("Still Waiting:" + time);
try{
sleep(500);
}catch(InterruptedException e){}
}
System.out.println("About to close");
//close the frame
ClosingFrame.this.processWindowEvent(
new WindowEvent(
ClosingFrame.this, WindowEvent.WINDOW_CLOSED));
}
}
//instantiate the Frame
public static void main(String args[]){
new ClosingFrame();
}
}
As you can see, the processWindowEvent() method causes the WindowClosed event to be fired where you have an oportunity to do some clean up code if you require before closing the application.
Take a look at the Oracle Documentation.
Starting from JDK 1.4 an Application terminates if:
There are no displayable AWT or Swing components.
There are no native events in the native event queue.
There are no AWT events in java EventQueues.
Cornercases:
The document states that some packages create displayable components without releasing them.A program which calls Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit() won't terminate. is among others given as an example.
Also other Processes can keep AWT alive when they, for what ever reason, are sending events into the native event queue.
Also I noticed that on some Systems it takes a coupple of seconds before the Application actually terminates.
I think, the idea is here the WindowListener - you can add any code there that you'd like to run before the thing shuts down
In response to other comments, DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE does not seem to properly exit the application - it only destroys the window, but the application will continue running. If you want to terminate the application use EXIT_ON_CLOSE.