I have been trying this all day in different variations with little success. Could someone please help explain what I am doing wrong? I am just a beginner with regards to threads.
private JTextArea text = new JTextArea();
private JButton button = new JButton("Cancel");
public StatusFrame() {
text.setEditable(false);
this.add(text);
this.add(button, BorderLayout.EAST);
this.setSize(new Dimension(150, 100));
this.setVisible(true);
}
public void updateStatus(String textIn) {
text.setText(textIn);
}
public JButton getButton() {
return button;
}
In another class, I am calling methods which may take a while to complete. I want to be able to call the StatusFrame.updateStatus() method to keep the user informed on the progress.
This is what I have:
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
final Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
//do something
status.update("process 1 completed");
//do something else
status.updateStatus("Process 2 completed");
}
The frame appears but none of the code after the runnable appears to be run/processed. It just stops/blocks/something. But the GUI remains active
Thanks for any advice.
P.S.: I have tried using invokeAndWait() method but again not sure if I am doing it the right way. For now a quick fix would be preferred as I have not learned much about threads yet. Any instructions are welcome.
You have the concepts backwards.
Here's your code
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
final Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
//do something
status.update("process 1 completed");
//do something else
status.updateStatus("Process 2 completed");
You should execute the long running code in a thread, and use the SwingUtilities invokeLater method to update the GUI.
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
final Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
new Thread(r).start();
// inside the StatusFrame
//do something
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
update("process 1 completed");
}
);
//do something else sometime later
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
update("Process 2 completed");
}
);
I don't know if I was clear in my answer.
Execute SwingUtilities.invokeLater when you start your Java application to make sure Swing components are on the Event Dispatch thread (EDT).
From the EDT, invoke long running processes as a runnable thread.
In the runnable thread, since you're not on the EDT, execute SwingUtilities.invokeLater whenever you're updating Swing components. This ensures that Swing components are updated on the EDT.
Every Swing application should start with a class like this:
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
import com.ggl.text.entry.model.TextEntryModel;
import com.ggl.text.entry.view.TextEntryFrame;
public class TextEntry implements Runnable {
#Override
public void run() {
new TextEntryFrame(new TextEntryModel());
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new TextEntry());
}
}
This class does 3 things.
Constructs the GUI data model.
Constructs the GUI JFrame.
Ensures that the Swing components are on the EDT.
You'll need to call the updates on EDT too. I would suggest to sleep on the main thread, to give GUI a chance to show up before any other work:
someMethod() {
// prevent GUI from freezing using threads
Runnable r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status = new StatusFrame();
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
try {
Thread.sleep(10);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
//do something
r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status.update("process 1 completed");
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
//do something else
r = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
status.update("Process 2 completed");
}
};
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
}
See Concurrency in Swing.
You may find using a Swing Worker easier to work with since it uses a Thread and has methods that will allow you to update the GUI properly.
Related
public class TimerProgram extends JFrame {
public TimerProgram(){
int DELAY=1000;
Timer t = new Timer(DELAY,new TimerListener());
t.start();
}
class TimerListener implements ActionListener{
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
System.out.println("Hello");
}
}
public static void main(String[]args){
new TimerProgram();
}
}
I am trying to make a timer that outputs every second the word hello, but it seems that when I type as the DELAY value 1000 , it outputs hello once and then it terminates. What am I doing wrong ? All help appreciated!
The JVM exited before the Timer fired.
Try:
t.setInitialDelay(0);
t.start();
to see the difference.
Or a better approach is to execute the code on the Event Dispatch Thread (EDT). All GUI code should execute on the EDT. By using SwingUtitities.invokeLater() you ensure the EDT has been created when your code executes:
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable()
{
public void run()
{
new TimerProgram();
}
});
Read the section from the Swing tutorial on Concurrency for more information about the EDT.
I have a method like below.
ProgressWindow is a sub class of JFrame containing JProgressBar.
addProgress() increments a value in the JProgressBar.
If I call this method from a method in another class, a frame of ProgressWindow will show up but not JProgressBar and some JLabels inside the frame. They show up after the last line (System.out.println("finish")).
If I call this method in a main method in the class containing this method, then every component (Bar, labels...) instantly shows up.
What can I do for showing the window correctly?
static void search(){
ProgressWindow window = new ProgressWindow();
window.setVisible(true);
ExecutorService execs = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(Runtime
.getRuntime().availableProcessors());
Collection<Callable<Void>> processes = new LinkedList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
processes.add(new Callable<Void>() {
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
progressWindow.addProgress(); // increment progress value
return null;
}
});
}
try {
execs.invokeAll(processes);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
execs.shutdown();
}
System.out.println("finish");
The main problem is you seem to be calling search from the context of the Event Dispatching Thread.
The problem occurs because you are using execs.invokeAll which blocks until all the callables have finished running.
This means that the EDT is unable to process new events in Event Queue, including repaint events, this is why your UI is coming to a stand still...
There are a number of issues you are now going to face...
You should never update/modify a UI component from any thread other than the EDT
You should block the EDT for any reason
You seem to want to know when the search is complete, so you know need some kind of event notification...
The first thing we need is some way to be notified that the search has completed, this means you can no longer rely on search returning when the search is complete...
public interface SearchListener {
public void searchCompleted();
}
Next we need an intermeditate search method that builds the UI and ensure that the search is launched within it's own Thread...
static void search(final SearchListener listener) {
final ProgressWindow window = new ProgressWindow();
window.setVisible(true);
Thread t = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
search(listener, window);
}
});
t.start();
}
Then we need to modify the original search method to utilise the SearchListener interface to provide notification when the search is complete...
static void search(final SearchListener listener, final ProgressWindow window){
ExecutorService execs = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(Runtime
.getRuntime().availableProcessors());
Collection<Callable<Void>> processes = new LinkedList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
processes.add(new Callable<Void>() {
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
// This method needs to ensure that
// what ever it does to the UI, it is done from within
// the context of the EDT!!
progressWindow.addProgress();
return null;
}
});
}
try {
execs.invokeAll(processes);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
execs.shutdown();
}
System.out.println("finish");
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
listener.searchCompleted();
}
});
}
Now, without the source code for addProgress, I might be tempted to use
processes.add(new Callable<Void>() {
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
progressWindow.addProgress();
}
});
return null;
}
});
}
Instead...
Take a look at Concurrency in Swing for more details
Sounds like you what you're wanting to do is invoke the setVisible on the Swing UI thread, you can do this with invokeAndWait or invokeLater.
So something like:
final ProgressWindow window = new ProgressWindow();
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
window.setVisible(true);
}
});
First code:
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
public class cos {
public static int a;
private static JLabel labeler;
// public static Runnable r1;
private JFrame frame;
/**
* Launch the application.
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
a = 0;
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
cos window = new cos();
window.frame.setVisible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
}
/**
* Create the application.
*/
public cos() {
initialize();
}
/**
* Initialize the contents of the frame.
*/
public void initialize() {
frame = new JFrame();
frame.setBounds(100, 100, 205, 194);
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
JLabel lblTime = new JLabel("Time:");
frame.getContentPane().add(lblTime, BorderLayout.WEST);
final JLabel labeler = new JLabel("");
frame.getContentPane().add(labeler, BorderLayout.CENTER);
JButton btnNewButton = new JButton("New button");
btnNewButton.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
Runnable r1 = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (a <= 10) {
a = a + 1;
labeler.setText(Integer.toString(a));
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
};
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent arg0) {
Thread threder = new Thread(r1);
threder.start();
// liczniczek bla = new liczniczek();
}
});
frame.getContentPane().add(btnNewButton, BorderLayout.SOUTH);
}
public void licznik() {
while (a < 60) {
a = a + 1;
labeler.setText(Integer.toString(a));
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
And now my question. I wanna use code like this:
Runnable r1 = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
licznik();
}
};
But that doesen't work. What i must do to separate this code ? Sorry for my bad english
Sierran.
never use Thread#sleep(int) during EDT, sure if is there only this thread then works correctly (with blockng EDT),
Runnable r1 = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
licznik();
}
};
is wrong than same as you call plain licznik();, you have to wrap that this way
Runnable r1 = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
labeler.setText(Integer.toString(a));
}
};
but again without Thread#sleep(int), you have three choises
1) change Thread to the javax.swing.Timer
2) change Thread to the Runnable#Thread, there you can delaying with Thread#sleep(int), but output to the GUI must be
Runnable r1 = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
labeler.setText(Integer.toString(a));
}
};
3) use SwingWorker, where output is in the EDT and you can use Thread#sleep(int) too
example Thread#sleep(int) during EDT
put all together
EDIT
don't use reserved words as class, method, variable, whatever Name in the Programing languages (meaning cos)
your code works by implements all three options that I post here,
What do you mean "it doesn't work"? It works for me. How are you trying to use this code, and what errors or problems are you having when you run it? Myself, I'd use a SwingWorker though and I'd set the JLabel's text via the SwingWorker's publish/process method pair. To learn more on how to use this, please see this tutorial: Concurrency in Swing
Edit
Actually, an easier way to accomplish what you want is to not use threads or Runnables directly at all but to use a Swing Timer as they're built for just this case. For more on this, please check out the Swing Timer Tutorial
I gather that you want the function licznik() to run in a separate thread. You create a Runnable, but you have to do something more to make its run() method execute. There are a couple of ways to do this:
Runnable r1 = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
licznik();
}
};
new Thread(r1).start();
or you can just subclass Thread directly:
Thread r1 = new Thread(){
public void run(){
licznik();
}
};
r1.start();
Runnable interface has no method licznik(). You can create class that implements Runnable with licznik() method.
Or if you do not need to reuse this method and use it just once, then the fastest way is to move its implementation inside new Runnable() block
Runnable r1 = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
this.licznik();
}
public void licznik(){
while (a < 60){
a = a + 1 ;
labeler.setText(Integer.toString(a));
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
};
Look on GitHub under at https://github.com/greggwon/Ham. Look at the source code in https://github.com/greggwon/Ham/blob/master/SwingUtil/src/org/wonderly/swing/ComponentUpdateThread.java to see how I've packaged this whole detail into a single class which uses anonymous inner classes to do the work. It would be possible to change this to lambdas now, but I have not used Java in several years and thus haven't made that change.
new ComponentUpdateThread( new Action[] { add, del, edit } ) {
public void setup() {
super.setup();
list.setEnabled(false);
list.clearSelection();
}
public Object construct() {
try {
Vector v = remote.getData();
Collections.sort( v );
return v;
} catch( Exception ex ) {
reportException(ex);
}
return null;
}
public void finished() {
try {
Vector v = (Vector)getValue();
if( v != null ) list.setListData(v);
} finally {
super.finished();
list.setEnabled(true);
edit.setEnabled(false);
del.setEnaled(false);
}
}
}.start();
With this style of work, you can use final values from surrounding blocks or other class visible data to control various aspects of what happens before, during and after background thread execution.
I've change this code around over the years in various ways and there are other variations of this that exist.
The arguments to the ComponentUpdateThread constructor are controls/actions to be "disabled" while the background thread is running. Other enable/disable activities can be more literally embedded into the activities in setup() and finished() (which are run in the AWT event thread) before "construct" is run in the background thread.
I'm new to Swing and I was trying to do this:
On pressing a JButton, the program will start iterating over hundreds of items, taking 1 second to process each one, and after finishing each one he should update a label to show the number of items already processed.
The problem is, the label's text is not updated until the cycle finishes iterating over all the items.
I searched online and apparently it's because this is running in the same thread, so I created a new thread to process the data and to update the variable to be used in the label (number of processed files).
But it didn't work. Then I even made another thread, which I start after the previous one, that just repaints the label. Still nothing works.
The code is like this:
btnNewButton.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
try { SwingUtilities.invokeLater(validateFiles); }
}); }
Runnable validateFiles = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
while(x_is_not_100) {
processLoadsOfStuff();
label.setText(x); }
}
};
Can you help me with this?
Simple - use a SwingWorker. For more information, read the Tasks that Have Interim Results tutorial.
Here's a pretty generic example that will use a JLabel to display counting from 0 to 30 -
public final class SwingWorkerDemo {
private static JLabel label =
new JLabel(String.valueOf(0), SwingConstants.CENTER);
public static void main(String[] args){
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable(){
#Override
public void run() {
createAndShowGUI();
}
});
JLabelSwingWorker workerThread = new JLabelSwingWorker();
workerThread.run();
}
private static void createAndShowGUI(){
final JFrame frame = new JFrame();
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.add(label);
frame.pack();
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
frame.setVisible(true);
}
private static class JLabelSwingWorker extends SwingWorker<Void, Integer>{
#Override
protected Void doInBackground() throws Exception {
for(int i = 1; i < 31; i++){
Thread.sleep(1000);
publish(i);
}
return null;
}
#Override
protected void process(List<Integer> integers) {
Integer i = integers.get(integers.size() - 1);
label.setText(i.toString());
}
}
}
The background processing must be done in a separate thread. But the label update must be done in the event dispatch thread.
So your code should look like this:
btnNewButton.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
// start a new thread for the background task
new Thread(validateFiles).start();
});
}
Runnable validateFiles = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
while(x_is_not_100) {
processLoadsOfStuff();
// use SwingUtilities.invokeLater so that the label update is done in the EDT:
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
label.setText(x);
}
});
}
};
But you might want to use the SwingWorker class, which is designed to do that in a simpler way. Its documentation is very well done and contains examples.
Bellow is the code for the simplest GUI countdown. Can the same be done in a shorter and more elegant way with the usage of the Swing timer?
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JLabel;
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
public class CountdownNew {
static JLabel label;
// Method which defines the appearance of the window.
public static void showGUI() {
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Simple Countdown");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
label = new JLabel("Some Text");
frame.add(label);
frame.pack();
frame.setVisible(true);
}
// Define a new thread in which the countdown is counting down.
public static Thread counter = new Thread() {
public void run() {
for (int i=10; i>0; i=i-1) {
updateGUI(i,label);
try {Thread.sleep(1000);} catch(InterruptedException e) {};
}
}
};
// A method which updates GUI (sets a new value of JLabel).
private static void updateGUI(final int i, final JLabel label) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(
new Runnable() {
public void run() {
label.setText("You have " + i + " seconds.");
}
}
);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
showGUI();
counter.start();
}
});
}
}
Yes you SHOULD use a Swing Timer. You SHOULD NOT, use a util Timer and TimerTask.
When a Swing Timer fires the code is executed on the EDT which means you just need to invoke the label.setText() method.
When using the uitl Timer and TimerTask, the code DOES NOT execute on the EDT, which means you need to wrap your code in a SwingUtilities.invokeLater to make sure the code executes on the EDT.
And that is way using a Swing Timer is shorter and more elegant than your current approach, it simplifies the coding because to code is executed on the EDT.
You could make it a little more elegant by using Timer with an appropriate TimerTask.
Yes, use a timer. updateGUI would be the code for the timer task, but it will need some changes as you won't be able to pass in i for each call since you just get a run() method.