We Keep Coding

Jackson: How to edit existing property to the JSON without modifying the POJO?

I need to edit the name of "existing field" in POJO instead of adding "extra_field". Is it possible with the approach referenced link below?
Please note I do not want to use #JsonProperty annotation.
Requirement is, I have a POJO and want to use different field name every time without change in POJO. For example I have a field c_id in POJO and some times it need to write as cust_id and another time it would be my_id.
Also note I cannot change implementation of POJO as it is already used in several modules and have generic implementation.
POJO Example:
class MyPojo {
String id;
// getter and setters
}
Expected output can be the following: (name of field can be changed)
{"cust_id": "123"}
{"my_id": "123"}

Mixins
The easiest way to modify the output of Jackson without adding annotations to the original POJO is using mixins.
Just define a mixin-class with the necessary annotations and indicate to Jackson that you want to use the mixin when serializing the original object.
private static class MyPojoMixin {
#JsonProperty("cust_id")
private String id;
}
public String serializeWithMixin(MyPojo p) throws JsonProcessingException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.addMixIn(MyPojo.class, MyPojoMixin.class);
return mapper.writeValueAsString(p);
}
Custom property naming strategy
If you need to programmatically change the field-name, you might not be able to use the mixin solution. You could then use a custom PropertyNamingStrategy:
public class IdRenamingStrategy extends PropertyNamingStrategy {
private final PropertyNamingStrategy inner;
private final String newIdPropertyName;
public IdRenamingStrategy(String newIdPropertyName) {
this(PropertyNamingStrategy.LOWER_CAMEL_CASE, newIdPropertyName);
}
public IdRenamingStrategy(PropertyNamingStrategy inner, String newIdPropertyName) {
this.inner = inner;
this.newIdPropertyName = newIdPropertyName;
}
private String translate(String propertyName) {
if ("id".equals(propertyName)) {
return newIdPropertyName;
} else {
return propertyName;
}
}
#Override
public String nameForField(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedField field, String defaultName) {
return inner.nameForField(config, field, translate(defaultName));
}
#Override
public String nameForGetterMethod(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedMethod method, String defaultName) {
return inner.nameForGetterMethod(config, method, translate(defaultName));
}
#Override
public String nameForSetterMethod(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedMethod method, String defaultName) {
return inner.nameForSetterMethod(config, method, translate(defaultName));
}
#Override
public String nameForConstructorParameter(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedParameter ctorParam, String defaultName) {
return inner.nameForConstructorParameter(config, ctorParam, translate(defaultName));
}
}
This can be used like this:
public String serializeWithPropertyNamingStrategy(MyPojo p) throws JsonProcessingException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(new IdRenamingStrategy("cust_id"));
return mapper.writeValueAsString(p));
}

Can A Data Field in JSON format be parsed? [duplicate]

I am trying to include raw JSON inside a Java object when the object is (de)serialized using Jackson. In order to test this functionality, I wrote the following test:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
#Test
public void test() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
String foo = "one";
String bar = "{\"A\":false}";
Pojo pojo = new Pojo();
pojo.foo = foo;
pojo.bar = bar;
String json = "{\"foo\":\"" + foo + "\",\"bar\":" + bar + "}";
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
String output = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
System.out.println(output);
assertEquals(json, output);
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertEquals(foo, deserialized.foo);
assertEquals(bar, deserialized.bar);
}
The code outputs the following line:
{"foo":"one","bar":{"A":false}}
The JSON is exactly how I want things to look. Unfortunately, the code fails with an exception when attempting to read the JSON back in to the object. Here is the exception:
org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonMappingException: Can not deserialize instance of java.lang.String out of START_OBJECT token
at [Source: java.io.StringReader#d70d7a; line: 1, column: 13] (through reference chain: com.tnal.prism.cobalt.gather.testing.Pojo["bar"])
Why does Jackson function just fine in one direction but fail when going the other direction? It seems like it should be able to take its own output as input again. I know what I'm trying to do is unorthodox (the general advice is to create an inner object for bar that has a property named A), but I don't want to interact with this JSON at all. My code is acting as a pass-through for this code -- I want to take in this JSON and send it back out again without touching a thing, because when the JSON changes I don't want my code to need modifications.
Thanks for the advice.
EDIT: Made Pojo a static class, which was causing a different error.

#JsonRawValue is intended for serialization-side only, since the reverse direction is a bit trickier to handle. In effect it was added to allow injecting pre-encoded content.
I guess it would be possible to add support for reverse, although that would be quite awkward: content will have to be parsed, and then re-written back to "raw" form, which may or may not be the same (since character quoting may differ).
This for general case. But perhaps it would make sense for some subset of problems.
But I think a work-around for your specific case would be to specify type as 'java.lang.Object', since this should work ok: for serialization, String will be output as is, and for deserialization, it will be deserialized as a Map. Actually you might want to have separate getter/setter if so; getter would return String for serialization (and needs #JsonRawValue); and setter would take either Map or Object. You could re-encode it to a String if that makes sense.

Following #StaxMan answer, I've made the following works like a charm:
public class Pojo {
Object json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
// default raw value: null or "[]"
return json == null ? null : json.toString();
}
public void setJson(JsonNode node) {
this.json = node;
}
}
And, to be faithful to the initial question, here is the working test:
public class PojoTest {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
#Test
public void test() throws IOException {
Pojo pojo = new Pojo("{\"foo\":18}");
String output = mapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
assertThat(output).isEqualTo("{\"json\":{\"foo\":18}}");
Pojo deserialized = mapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertThat(deserialized.json.toString()).isEqualTo("{\"foo\":18}");
// deserialized.json == {"foo":18}
}
}

I was able to do this with a custom deserializer (cut and pasted from here)
package etc;
import java.io.IOException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.TreeNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer;
/**
* Keeps json value as json, does not try to deserialize it
* #author roytruelove
*
*/
public class KeepAsJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt)
throws IOException {
TreeNode tree = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
return tree.toString();
}
}
Use it by annotating the desired member like this:
#JsonDeserialize(using = KeepAsJsonDeserializer.class)
private String value;

#JsonSetter may help. See my sample ('data' is supposed to contain unparsed JSON):
class Purchase
{
String data;
#JsonProperty("signature")
String signature;
#JsonSetter("data")
void setData(JsonNode data)
{
this.data = data.toString();
}
}

This is a problem with your inner classes. The Pojo class is a non-static inner class of your test class, and Jackson cannot instantiate that class. So it can serialize, but not deserialize.
Redefine your class like this:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
Note the addition of static

Adding to Roy Truelove's great answer, this is how to inject the custom deserialiser in response to appearance of #JsonRawValue:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.Module;
#Component
public class ModuleImpl extends Module {
#Override
public void setupModule(SetupContext context) {
context.addBeanDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifierImpl());
}
}
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRawValue;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.BeanDescription;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerBuilder;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerModifier;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.SettableBeanProperty;
public class BeanDeserializerModifierImpl extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Iterator<SettableBeanProperty> it = builder.getProperties();
while (it.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty p = it.next();
if (p.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(p.withValueDeserializer(KeepAsJsonDeserialzier.INSTANCE), true);
}
}
return builder;
}
}

This easy solution worked for me:
public class MyObject {
private Object rawJsonValue;
public Object getRawJsonValue() {
return rawJsonValue;
}
public void setRawJsonValue(Object rawJsonValue) {
this.rawJsonValue = rawJsonValue;
}
}
So I was able to store raw value of JSON in rawJsonValue variable and then it was no problem to deserialize it (as object) with other fields back to JSON and send via my REST. Using #JsonRawValue didnt helped me because stored JSON was deserialized as String, not as object, and that was not what I wanted.

This even works in a JPA entity:
private String json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
return json;
}
public void setJson(final String json) {
this.json = json;
}
#JsonProperty(value = "json")
public void setJsonRaw(JsonNode jsonNode) {
// this leads to non-standard json, see discussion:
// setJson(jsonNode.toString());
StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonGenerator generator =
new JsonFactory(objectMapper).createGenerator(stringWriter);
generator.writeTree(n);
setJson(stringWriter.toString());
}
Ideally the ObjectMapper and even JsonFactory are from the context and are configured so as to handle your JSON correctly (standard or with non-standard values like 'Infinity' floats for example).

Here is a full working example of how to use Jackson modules to make #JsonRawValue work both ways (serialization and deserialization):
public class JsonRawValueDeserializerModule extends SimpleModule {
public JsonRawValueDeserializerModule() {
setDeserializerModifier(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier());
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
builder.getProperties().forEachRemaining(property -> {
if (property.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(property.withValueDeserializer(JsonRawValueDeserializer.INSTANCE), true);
}
});
return builder;
}
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
private static final JsonDeserializer<String> INSTANCE = new JsonRawValueDeserializer();
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
return p.readValueAsTree().toString();
}
}
}
Then you can register the module after creating the ObjectMapper:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.registerModule(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModule());
String json = "{\"foo\":\"one\",\"bar\":{\"A\":false}}";
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(json, Pojo.class);

I had the exact same issue.
I found the solution in this post :
Parse JSON tree to plain class using Jackson or its alternatives
Check out the last answer.
By defining a custom setter for the property that takes a JsonNode as parameter and calls the toString method on the jsonNode to set the String property, it all works out.

Using an object works fine both ways... This method has a bit of overhead deserializing the raw value in two times.
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
RawJsonValue value = new RawJsonValue();
value.setRawValue(new RawHello(){{this.data = "universe...";}});
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(value);
System.out.println(json);
RawJsonValue result = mapper.readValue(json, RawJsonValue.class);
json = mapper.writeValueAsString(result.getRawValue());
System.out.println(json);
RawHello hello = mapper.readValue(json, RawHello.class);
System.out.println(hello.data);
RawHello.java
public class RawHello {
public String data;
}
RawJsonValue.java
public class RawJsonValue {
private Object rawValue;
public Object getRawValue() {
return rawValue;
}
public void setRawValue(Object value) {
this.rawValue = value;
}
}

I had a similar problem, but using a list with a lot of JSON itens (List<String>).
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
private List<String> jsons;
}
I managed the serialization using the #JsonRawValue annotation. But for deserialization I had to create a custom deserializer based on Roy's suggestion.
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
#JsonRawValue
#JsonDeserialize(using = JsonListPassThroughDeserialzier.class)
private List<String> jsons;
}
Below you can see my "List" deserializer.
public class JsonListPassThroughDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<List<String>> {
#Override
public List<String> deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext cxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
if (jp.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_ARRAY) {
final List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
while (jp.nextToken() != JsonToken.END_ARRAY) {
list.add(jp.getCodec().readTree(jp).toString());
}
return list;
}
throw cxt.instantiationException(List.class, "Expected Json list");
}
}

Customize jackson unmarshalling behavior

I am using Jackson fasterxml for unmarshalling JSON. In my object there are two kinds of properties:Input properties and Calculated properties. In the input JSON, I get only input values.
The calculated values are actually dependent on input values. I have to populate these values before the object gets referred. So I am just checking if there are any hooks provided by Jackson so that I can do my calculations there. For example JAXB provides afterUnmarshal method to customize the unmarshaling behavior:
void afterUnmarshal(Unmarshaller u, Object parent)
But I could not find similar information about customizing Jackson. Are any such framework hooks provided by Jackson to customize the unmarshaling behavior?

I'd rather recommend to keep your model objects immutable by using constructor creators. That is, all the JSON values are passed to a constructor which would initialize the other calculated properties.
Anyway, if you want to customize an object after deserialization (without writing a deserializer for every type) you can modify the deserializer in a way that at the end it calls a special method(s) of a newly constructed instance. Here is an example which would work for all the classes that implements a special interface (one can consider using an annotation to mark the post construct methods).
public class JacksonPostConstruct {
public static interface PostConstructor {
void postConstruct();
}
public static class Bean implements PostConstructor {
private final String field;
#JsonCreator
public Bean(#JsonProperty("field") String field) {
this.field = field;
}
public void postConstruct() {
System.out.println("Post construct: " + toString());
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Bean{" +
"field='" + field + '\'' +
'}';
}
}
private static class PostConstructDeserializer extends DelegatingDeserializer {
private final JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer;
public PostConstructDeserializer(JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer) {
super(deserializer);
this.deserializer = deserializer;
}
#Override
protected JsonDeserializer<?> newDelegatingInstance(JsonDeserializer<?> newDelegatee) {
return deserializer;
}
#Override
public Object deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
Object result = _delegatee.deserialize(jp, ctxt);
if (result instanceof PostConstructor) {
((PostConstructor) result).postConstruct();
}
return result;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.setDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifier() {
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<?> modifyDeserializer(DeserializationConfig config,
BeanDescription beanDesc,
final JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer) {
return new PostConstructDeserializer(deserializer);
}
});
mapper.registerModule(module);
String json = "{\"field\":\"value\"}";
System.out.println(mapper.readValue(json, Bean.class));
}
}
Output:
Post construct: Bean{field='value'}
Bean{field='value'}

Let's assume that your JSON looks like this:
{
"input1" : "Input value",
"input2" : 3
}
And your POJO class looks like this:
class Entity {
private String input1;
private int input2;
private String calculated1;
private long calculated2;
...
}
In this case you can write a custom deserializer for your Entity class:
class EntityJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<Entity> {
#Override
public Entity deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException {
InnerEntity innerEntity = jp.readValueAs(InnerEntity.class);
Entity entity = new Entity();
entity.setInput1(innerEntity.input1);
entity.setInput2(innerEntity.input2);
entity.recalculate();
return entity;
}
public static class InnerEntity {
public String input1;
public int input2;
}
}
In above class you can see that Entity has a recalculate method. It could look like this:
public void recalculate() {
calculated1 = input1 + input2;
calculated2 = input1.length() + input2;
}
You can also move this logic to your deserializer class.
Now, you have to inform Jackson that you want to use your custom deserializer:
#JsonDeserialize(using = EntityJsonDeserializer.class)
class Entity {
...
}
The example below shows how to use these classes:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
System.out.println(mapper.readValue(json, Entity.class));
This program prints:
Entity [input1=Input value, input2=3, calculated1=Input value3, calculated2=14]

Force Jackson to add addional wrapping using annotations

I have the following class:
public class Message {
private String text;
public String getText() {
return text;
}
public void setText(String text) {
this.text = text;
}
}
When converting the instance to JSON using Jackson by default I get:
{"text":"Text"}
I would like to get:
{"message":{"text":"Text"}}
Is there any JAXB / Jackson annotation I can use to achieve my goal?
As a workaround, I can wrap my class with another class:
public class MessageWrapper {
private Message message;
public Message getMessage() {
return message;
}
public void setMessage(Message message) {
this.message = message;
}
}
or a more generic solution:
public class JsonObjectWrapper<T> {
/**
* Using a real map to allow wrapping multiple objects
*/
private Map<String, T> wrappedObjects = new HashMap<String, T>();
public JsonObjectWrapper() {
}
public JsonObjectWrapper(String name, T wrappedObject) {
this.wrappedObjects.put(name, wrappedObject);
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, T> any() {
return wrappedObjects;
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void set(String name, T value) {
wrappedObjects.put(name, value);
}
}
Which can be used like so:
Message message = new Message();
message.setText("Text");
JsonObjectWrapper<Message> wrapper = new JsonObjectWrapper<Message>("message", message);
Is there any JAXB / Jackson annotation I can use to achieve my goal?
Thanks.

With Jackson 2.x use can use the following to enable wrapper without adding addition properties in the ObjectMapper
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonTypeInfo;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonTypeName;
#JsonTypeInfo(include = JsonTypeInfo.As.WRAPPER_OBJECT, use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME)
#JsonTypeName(value = "student")
public class Student {
private String name;
private String id;
}

On workaround: you don't absolutely need those getters/setters, so could just have:
public class MessageWrapper {
public Message message;
}
or perhaps add convenience constructor:
public class MessageWrapper {
public Message message;
#JsonCreator
public MessageWrapper(#JsonProperty("message") Message m) {
message = m;
}
}
There is a way to add wrapping too; with 1.9 you can use SerializationConfig.Feature.WRAP_ROOT_ELEMENT and DeserializationConfig.Feature.UNWRAP_ROOT_ELEMENT. And if you want to change the wrapper name (by default it is simply unqualified class name), you can use #JsonRootName annotation
Jackson 2.0 adds further dynamic options via ObjectReader and ObjectWriter, as well as JAX-RS annotations.

It was sad to learn that you must write custom serialization for the simple goal of wrapping a class with a labeled object. After playing around with writing a custom serializer, I concluded that the simplest solution is a generic wrapper. Here's perhaps a more simple implementation of your example above:
public final class JsonObjectWrapper {
private JsonObjectWrapper() {}
public static <E> Map<String, E> withLabel(String label, E wrappedObject) {
HashMap<String, E> map = new HashMap<String, E>();
map.put(label, wrappedObject);
return map;
}
}

Provided you don't mind the json having a capital m in message, then the simplest way to do this is to annotate your class with #JsonTypeInfo.
You would add:
#JsonTypeInfo(include=As.WRAPPER_OBJECT, use=Id.NAME)
public class Message {
// ...
}
to get {"Message":{"text":"Text"}}

A Simpler/Better way to do it:
#JsonRootName(value = "message")
public class Message { ...}
then use
new ObjectMapper().configure(SerializationFeature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true).writeValueAs...

If using spring, then in application.properties file add following:-
spring.jackson.serialization.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE=true
And then use #JsonRootName annotation on any of your class that you wish to serialize. e.g.
#JsonRootName("user")
public class User {
private String name;
private Integer age;
}

I have created a small jackson module that contains a #JsonWrapped annotation, that solves the problem. See here for the code: https://github.com/mwerlitz/jackson-wrapped
Your class would then look like:
public class Message {
#JsonWrapped("message")
private String text;
}

Jackson Mapper post-construct

I am using the Jackson ObjectMapper to deserialize some JSON into a Java class, which we'll call PlayerData. I would like to add a bit of logic to the PlayerData class to fix up some data after the fields have been loaded in. For example, some early JSON files used to use a "sex" flag instead of a "gender" falg, so if the sex flag is set but the gender flag is not set, I'd like to set the value of the gender field to be the value of the sex field.
Is there some sort of #PostConstruct or #AfterLoad annotation that I could affix to a method? Or perhaps an interface that I could implement? I didn't notice one in the documentation, but it seemed like an obvious feature.

Found this thru a link in the comments (credit: fedor.belov). This appears to allow you to run code post construct.
Adding a comment for people who end up here via
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JACKSON-645 or
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JACKSON-538 and are looking for a
method which is called after a deserializer completes. I was able to
achieve the desired effect by including an annotation and writing a
converter which uses the same class as input and output.
#JsonDeserialize(converter=MyClassSanitizer.class) // invoked after class is fully deserialized
public class MyClass {
public String field1;
}
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.StdConverter;
public class MyClassSanitizer extends StdConverter<MyClass,MyClass> {
#Override
public MyClass convert(MyClass var1) {
var1.field1 = munge(var1.field1);
return var1;
}
}

If you're not using the #JsonCreator, then Jackson will use the setter and getter methods to set the fields.
So if you define the following methods assuming that you have Sex and Gender enums:
#JsonProperty("sex")
public void setSex(final Sex sex) {
this.sex = sex;
if (gender == null) {
gender = (sex == Sex.WOMAN) ? Gender.WOMAN : Gender.MAN;
}
}
#JsonProperty("gender")
public void setGender(final Gender gender) {
this.gender = gender;
if (sex == null) {
sex = (gender == Gender.WOMAN) ? Sex.WOMAN : Sex.MAN;
}
}
it would work.
Update: You can find all of the annotations of Jackson library here.
Update2: Other solution:
class Example {
private final Sex sex;
private final Gender gender;
#JsonCreator
public Example(#JsonProperty("sex") final Sex sex) {
super();
this.sex = sex;
this.gender = getGenderBySex(sex)
}
#JsonFactory
public static Example createExample(#JsonProperty("gender") final Gender gender) {
return new Example(getSexByGender(gender));
}
private static Sex getSexByGender(final Gender) {
return (gender == Gender.WOMAN) ? Sex.WOMAN : Sex.MAN;
}
private static Gender getGenderBySex(final Sex) {
return (sex == Sex.WOMAN) ? Gender.WOMAN : Gender.MAN;
}
}

This is not supported out of the box, but you can easily create your #JsonPostDeserialize annotation for methods to be called after deserialization.
First, define the annotation:
/**
* Annotation for methods to be called directly after deserialization of the object.
*/
#Target({ ElementType.METHOD })
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface JsonPostDeserialize {
}
Then, add the following registration and implementation code to your project:
public static void addPostDeserializeSupport(ObjectMapper objectMapper) {
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.setDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifier() {
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<?> modifyDeserializer(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDescription,
JsonDeserializer<?> originalDeserializer) {
return new CustomAnnotationsDeserializer(originalDeserializer, beanDescription);
}
});
objectMapper.registerModule(module);
}
/**
* Class implementing the functionality of the {#link JsonPostDeserialize} annotation.
*/
public class CustomAnnotationsDeserializer extends DelegatingDeserializer {
private final BeanDescription beanDescription;
public CustomAnnotationsDeserializer(JsonDeserializer<?> delegate, BeanDescription beanDescription) {
super(delegate);
this.beanDescription = beanDescription;
}
#Override
protected JsonDeserializer<?> newDelegatingInstance(JsonDeserializer<?> newDelegatee) {
return new CustomAnnotationsDeserializer(newDelegatee, beanDescription);
}
#Override
public Object deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
Object deserializedObject = super.deserialize(p, ctxt);
callPostDeserializeMethods(deserializedObject);
return deserializedObject;
}
private void callPostDeserializeMethods(Object deserializedObject) {
for (AnnotatedMethod method : beanDescription.getClassInfo().memberMethods()) {
if (method.hasAnnotation(JsonPostDeserialize.class)) {
try {
method.callOn(deserializedObject);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Failed to call #JsonPostDeserialize annotated method in class "
+ beanDescription.getClassInfo().getName(), e);
}
}
}
}
}
Finally, modify your ObjectMapper instance with addPostDeserializeSupport, it will invoke all #JsonPostDeserialize annotated method of deserialized objects.

This is something that has actually been suggested couple of times earlier. So maybe filing an RFE would make sense; there are multiple ways in which this could work: obvious ones being ability to annotate type (#JsonPostProcess(Processor.class)) and ability to register post-processor through Module API (so that there's basically a callback when Jackson constructs deserializer, to let module specify post-processor to use if any). But perhaps there are even better ways to do this.