I am using Jackson fasterxml for unmarshalling JSON. In my object there are two kinds of properties:Input properties and Calculated properties. In the input JSON, I get only input values.
The calculated values are actually dependent on input values. I have to populate these values before the object gets referred. So I am just checking if there are any hooks provided by Jackson so that I can do my calculations there. For example JAXB provides afterUnmarshal method to customize the unmarshaling behavior:
void afterUnmarshal(Unmarshaller u, Object parent)
But I could not find similar information about customizing Jackson. Are any such framework hooks provided by Jackson to customize the unmarshaling behavior?
I'd rather recommend to keep your model objects immutable by using constructor creators. That is, all the JSON values are passed to a constructor which would initialize the other calculated properties.
Anyway, if you want to customize an object after deserialization (without writing a deserializer for every type) you can modify the deserializer in a way that at the end it calls a special method(s) of a newly constructed instance. Here is an example which would work for all the classes that implements a special interface (one can consider using an annotation to mark the post construct methods).
public class JacksonPostConstruct {
public static interface PostConstructor {
void postConstruct();
}
public static class Bean implements PostConstructor {
private final String field;
#JsonCreator
public Bean(#JsonProperty("field") String field) {
this.field = field;
}
public void postConstruct() {
System.out.println("Post construct: " + toString());
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Bean{" +
"field='" + field + '\'' +
'}';
}
}
private static class PostConstructDeserializer extends DelegatingDeserializer {
private final JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer;
public PostConstructDeserializer(JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer) {
super(deserializer);
this.deserializer = deserializer;
}
#Override
protected JsonDeserializer<?> newDelegatingInstance(JsonDeserializer<?> newDelegatee) {
return deserializer;
}
#Override
public Object deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
Object result = _delegatee.deserialize(jp, ctxt);
if (result instanceof PostConstructor) {
((PostConstructor) result).postConstruct();
}
return result;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.setDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifier() {
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<?> modifyDeserializer(DeserializationConfig config,
BeanDescription beanDesc,
final JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer) {
return new PostConstructDeserializer(deserializer);
}
});
mapper.registerModule(module);
String json = "{\"field\":\"value\"}";
System.out.println(mapper.readValue(json, Bean.class));
}
}
Output:
Post construct: Bean{field='value'}
Bean{field='value'}
Let's assume that your JSON looks like this:
{
"input1" : "Input value",
"input2" : 3
}
And your POJO class looks like this:
class Entity {
private String input1;
private int input2;
private String calculated1;
private long calculated2;
...
}
In this case you can write a custom deserializer for your Entity class:
class EntityJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<Entity> {
#Override
public Entity deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException {
InnerEntity innerEntity = jp.readValueAs(InnerEntity.class);
Entity entity = new Entity();
entity.setInput1(innerEntity.input1);
entity.setInput2(innerEntity.input2);
entity.recalculate();
return entity;
}
public static class InnerEntity {
public String input1;
public int input2;
}
}
In above class you can see that Entity has a recalculate method. It could look like this:
public void recalculate() {
calculated1 = input1 + input2;
calculated2 = input1.length() + input2;
}
You can also move this logic to your deserializer class.
Now, you have to inform Jackson that you want to use your custom deserializer:
#JsonDeserialize(using = EntityJsonDeserializer.class)
class Entity {
...
}
The example below shows how to use these classes:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
System.out.println(mapper.readValue(json, Entity.class));
This program prints:
Entity [input1=Input value, input2=3, calculated1=Input value3, calculated2=14]
Related
How can I deserialize JSON string that contains enum values that are case insensitive? (using Jackson Databind)
The JSON string:
[{"url": "foo", "type": "json"}]
and my Java POJO:
public static class Endpoint {
public enum DataType {
JSON, HTML
}
public String url;
public DataType type;
public Endpoint() {
}
}
in this case,deserializing the JSON with "type":"json" would fail where as "type":"JSON" would work.
But I want "json" to work as well for naming convention reasons.
Serializing the POJO also results in upper case "type":"JSON"
I thought of using #JsonCreator and #JsonGetter:
#JsonCreator
private Endpoint(#JsonProperty("name") String url, #JsonProperty("type") String type) {
this.url = url;
this.type = DataType.valueOf(type.toUpperCase());
}
//....
#JsonGetter
private String getType() {
return type.name().toLowerCase();
}
And it worked. But I was wondering whether there's a better solutuon because this looks like a hack to me.
I can also write a custom deserializer but I got many different POJOs that use enums and it would be hard to maintain.
Can anyone suggest a better way to serialize and deserialize enums with proper naming convention?
I don't want my enums in java to be lowercase!
Here is some test code that I used:
String data = "[{\"url\":\"foo\", \"type\":\"json\"}]";
Endpoint[] arr = new ObjectMapper().readValue(data, Endpoint[].class);
System.out.println("POJO[]->" + Arrays.toString(arr));
System.out.println("JSON ->" + new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(arr));
Jackson 2.9
This is now very simple, using jackson-databind 2.9.0 and above
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.enable(MapperFeature.ACCEPT_CASE_INSENSITIVE_ENUMS);
// objectMapper now deserializes enums in a case-insensitive manner
Full example with tests
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.MapperFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class Main {
private enum TestEnum { ONE }
private static class TestObject { public TestEnum testEnum; }
public static void main (String[] args) {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.enable(MapperFeature.ACCEPT_CASE_INSENSITIVE_ENUMS);
try {
TestObject uppercase =
objectMapper.readValue("{ \"testEnum\": \"ONE\" }", TestObject.class);
TestObject lowercase =
objectMapper.readValue("{ \"testEnum\": \"one\" }", TestObject.class);
TestObject mixedcase =
objectMapper.readValue("{ \"testEnum\": \"oNe\" }", TestObject.class);
if (uppercase.testEnum != TestEnum.ONE) throw new Exception("cannot deserialize uppercase value");
if (lowercase.testEnum != TestEnum.ONE) throw new Exception("cannot deserialize lowercase value");
if (mixedcase.testEnum != TestEnum.ONE) throw new Exception("cannot deserialize mixedcase value");
System.out.println("Success: all deserializations worked");
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
I ran into this same issue in my project, we decided to build our enums with a string key and use #JsonValue and a static constructor for serialization and deserialization respectively.
public enum DataType {
JSON("json"),
HTML("html");
private String key;
DataType(String key) {
this.key = key;
}
#JsonCreator
public static DataType fromString(String key) {
return key == null
? null
: DataType.valueOf(key.toUpperCase());
}
#JsonValue
public String getKey() {
return key;
}
}
Since Jackson 2.6, you can simply do this:
public enum DataType {
#JsonProperty("json")
JSON,
#JsonProperty("html")
HTML
}
For a full example, see this gist.
In version 2.4.0 you can register a custom serializer for all the Enum types (link to the github issue). Also you can replace the standard Enum deserializer on your own that will be aware about the Enum type. Here is an example:
public class JacksonEnum {
public static enum DataType {
JSON, HTML
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
List<DataType> types = Arrays.asList(JSON, HTML);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.setDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifier() {
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<Enum> modifyEnumDeserializer(DeserializationConfig config,
final JavaType type,
BeanDescription beanDesc,
final JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer) {
return new JsonDeserializer<Enum>() {
#Override
public Enum deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
Class<? extends Enum> rawClass = (Class<Enum<?>>) type.getRawClass();
return Enum.valueOf(rawClass, jp.getValueAsString().toUpperCase());
}
};
}
});
module.addSerializer(Enum.class, new StdSerializer<Enum>(Enum.class) {
#Override
public void serialize(Enum value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
jgen.writeString(value.name().toLowerCase());
}
});
mapper.registerModule(module);
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(types);
System.out.println(json);
List<DataType> types2 = mapper.readValue(json, new TypeReference<List<DataType>>() {});
System.out.println(types2);
}
}
Output:
["json","html"]
[JSON, HTML]
If you're using Spring Boot 2.1.x with Jackson 2.9 you can simply use this application property:
spring.jackson.mapper.accept-case-insensitive-enums=true
I went for the solution of Sam B. but a simpler variant.
public enum Type {
PIZZA, APPLE, PEAR, SOUP;
#JsonCreator
public static Type fromString(String key) {
for(Type type : Type.values()) {
if(type.name().equalsIgnoreCase(key)) {
return type;
}
}
return null;
}
}
For those who tries to deserialize Enum ignoring case in GET parameters, enabling ACCEPT_CASE_INSENSITIVE_ENUMS will not do any good. It won't help because this option only works for body deserialization. Instead try this:
public class StringToEnumConverter implements Converter<String, Modes> {
#Override
public Modes convert(String from) {
return Modes.valueOf(from.toUpperCase());
}
}
and then
#Configuration
public class WebConfig implements WebMvcConfigurer {
#Override
public void addFormatters(FormatterRegistry registry) {
registry.addConverter(new StringToEnumConverter());
}
}
The answer and code samples are from here
To allow case insensitive deserialization of enums in jackson, simply add the below property to the application.properties file of your spring boot project.
spring.jackson.mapper.accept-case-insensitive-enums=true
If you have the yaml version of properties file, add below property to your application.yml file.
spring:
jackson:
mapper:
accept-case-insensitive-enums: true
With apologies to #Konstantin Zyubin, his answer was close to what I needed - but I didn't understand it, so here's how I think it should go:
If you want to deserialize one enum type as case insensitive - i.e. you don't want to, or can't, modify the behavior of the entire application, you can create a custom deserializer just for one type - by sub-classing StdConverter and force Jackson to use it only on the relevant fields using the JsonDeserialize annotation.
Example:
public class ColorHolder {
public enum Color {
RED, GREEN, BLUE
}
public static final class ColorParser extends StdConverter<String, Color> {
#Override
public Color convert(String value) {
return Arrays.stream(Color.values())
.filter(e -> e.getName().equalsIgnoreCase(value.trim()))
.findFirst()
.orElseThrow(() -> new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid value '" + value + "'"));
}
}
#JsonDeserialize(converter = ColorParser.class)
Color color;
}
Problem is releated to com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.EnumResolver. it uses HashMap to hold enum values and HashMap doesn't support case insensitive keys.
in answers above, all chars should be uppercase or lowercase. but I fixed all (in)sensitive problems for enums with that:
https://gist.github.com/bhdrk/02307ba8066d26fa1537
CustomDeserializers.java
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.BeanDescription;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.std.EnumDeserializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleDeserializers;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.EnumResolver;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class CustomDeserializers extends SimpleDeserializers {
#Override
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public JsonDeserializer<?> findEnumDeserializer(Class<?> type, DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc) throws JsonMappingException {
return createDeserializer((Class<Enum>) type);
}
private <T extends Enum<T>> JsonDeserializer<?> createDeserializer(Class<T> enumCls) {
T[] enumValues = enumCls.getEnumConstants();
HashMap<String, T> map = createEnumValuesMap(enumValues);
return new EnumDeserializer(new EnumCaseInsensitiveResolver<T>(enumCls, enumValues, map));
}
private <T extends Enum<T>> HashMap<String, T> createEnumValuesMap(T[] enumValues) {
HashMap<String, T> map = new HashMap<String, T>();
// from last to first, so that in case of duplicate values, first wins
for (int i = enumValues.length; --i >= 0; ) {
T e = enumValues[i];
map.put(e.toString(), e);
}
return map;
}
public static class EnumCaseInsensitiveResolver<T extends Enum<T>> extends EnumResolver<T> {
protected EnumCaseInsensitiveResolver(Class<T> enumClass, T[] enums, HashMap<String, T> map) {
super(enumClass, enums, map);
}
#Override
public T findEnum(String key) {
for (Map.Entry<String, T> entry : _enumsById.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey().equalsIgnoreCase(key)) { // magic line <--
return entry.getValue();
}
}
return null;
}
}
}
Usage:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleModule;
public class JSON {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SimpleModule enumModule = new SimpleModule();
enumModule.setDeserializers(new CustomDeserializers());
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.registerModule(enumModule);
}
}
I used a modification of Iago Fernández and Paul solution .
I had an enum in my requestobject which needed to be case insensitive
#POST
public Response doSomePostAction(RequestObject object){
//resource implementation
}
class RequestObject{
//other params
MyEnumType myType;
#JsonSetter
public void setMyType(String type){
myType = MyEnumType.valueOf(type.toUpperCase());
}
#JsonGetter
public String getType(){
return myType.toString();//this can change
}
}
Here's how I sometimes handle enums when I want to deserialize in a case-insensitive manner (building on the code posted in the question):
#JsonIgnore
public void setDataType(DataType dataType)
{
type = dataType;
}
#JsonProperty
public void setDataType(String dataType)
{
// Clean up/validate String however you want. I like
// org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils.trimToEmpty
String d = StringUtils.trimToEmpty(dataType).toUpperCase();
setDataType(DataType.valueOf(d));
}
If the enum is non-trivial and thus in its own class I usually add a static parse method to handle lowercase Strings.
Deserialize enum with jackson is simple. When you want deserialize enum based in String need a constructor, a getter and a setter to your enum.Also class that use that enum must have a setter which receive DataType as param, not String:
public class Endpoint {
public enum DataType {
JSON("json"), HTML("html");
private String type;
#JsonValue
public String getDataType(){
return type;
}
#JsonSetter
public void setDataType(String t){
type = t.toLowerCase();
}
}
public String url;
public DataType type;
public Endpoint() {
}
public void setType(DataType dataType){
type = dataType;
}
}
When you have your json, you can deserialize to Endpoint class using ObjectMapper of Jackson:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.enable(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT);
try {
Endpoint endpoint = mapper.readValue("{\"url\":\"foo\",\"type\":\"json\"}", Endpoint.class);
} catch (IOException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
}
I am trying to include raw JSON inside a Java object when the object is (de)serialized using Jackson. In order to test this functionality, I wrote the following test:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
#Test
public void test() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
String foo = "one";
String bar = "{\"A\":false}";
Pojo pojo = new Pojo();
pojo.foo = foo;
pojo.bar = bar;
String json = "{\"foo\":\"" + foo + "\",\"bar\":" + bar + "}";
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
String output = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
System.out.println(output);
assertEquals(json, output);
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertEquals(foo, deserialized.foo);
assertEquals(bar, deserialized.bar);
}
The code outputs the following line:
{"foo":"one","bar":{"A":false}}
The JSON is exactly how I want things to look. Unfortunately, the code fails with an exception when attempting to read the JSON back in to the object. Here is the exception:
org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonMappingException: Can not deserialize instance of java.lang.String out of START_OBJECT token
at [Source: java.io.StringReader#d70d7a; line: 1, column: 13] (through reference chain: com.tnal.prism.cobalt.gather.testing.Pojo["bar"])
Why does Jackson function just fine in one direction but fail when going the other direction? It seems like it should be able to take its own output as input again. I know what I'm trying to do is unorthodox (the general advice is to create an inner object for bar that has a property named A), but I don't want to interact with this JSON at all. My code is acting as a pass-through for this code -- I want to take in this JSON and send it back out again without touching a thing, because when the JSON changes I don't want my code to need modifications.
Thanks for the advice.
EDIT: Made Pojo a static class, which was causing a different error.
#JsonRawValue is intended for serialization-side only, since the reverse direction is a bit trickier to handle. In effect it was added to allow injecting pre-encoded content.
I guess it would be possible to add support for reverse, although that would be quite awkward: content will have to be parsed, and then re-written back to "raw" form, which may or may not be the same (since character quoting may differ).
This for general case. But perhaps it would make sense for some subset of problems.
But I think a work-around for your specific case would be to specify type as 'java.lang.Object', since this should work ok: for serialization, String will be output as is, and for deserialization, it will be deserialized as a Map. Actually you might want to have separate getter/setter if so; getter would return String for serialization (and needs #JsonRawValue); and setter would take either Map or Object. You could re-encode it to a String if that makes sense.
Following #StaxMan answer, I've made the following works like a charm:
public class Pojo {
Object json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
// default raw value: null or "[]"
return json == null ? null : json.toString();
}
public void setJson(JsonNode node) {
this.json = node;
}
}
And, to be faithful to the initial question, here is the working test:
public class PojoTest {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
#Test
public void test() throws IOException {
Pojo pojo = new Pojo("{\"foo\":18}");
String output = mapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
assertThat(output).isEqualTo("{\"json\":{\"foo\":18}}");
Pojo deserialized = mapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertThat(deserialized.json.toString()).isEqualTo("{\"foo\":18}");
// deserialized.json == {"foo":18}
}
}
I was able to do this with a custom deserializer (cut and pasted from here)
package etc;
import java.io.IOException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.TreeNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer;
/**
* Keeps json value as json, does not try to deserialize it
* #author roytruelove
*
*/
public class KeepAsJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt)
throws IOException {
TreeNode tree = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
return tree.toString();
}
}
Use it by annotating the desired member like this:
#JsonDeserialize(using = KeepAsJsonDeserializer.class)
private String value;
#JsonSetter may help. See my sample ('data' is supposed to contain unparsed JSON):
class Purchase
{
String data;
#JsonProperty("signature")
String signature;
#JsonSetter("data")
void setData(JsonNode data)
{
this.data = data.toString();
}
}
This is a problem with your inner classes. The Pojo class is a non-static inner class of your test class, and Jackson cannot instantiate that class. So it can serialize, but not deserialize.
Redefine your class like this:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
Note the addition of static
Adding to Roy Truelove's great answer, this is how to inject the custom deserialiser in response to appearance of #JsonRawValue:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.Module;
#Component
public class ModuleImpl extends Module {
#Override
public void setupModule(SetupContext context) {
context.addBeanDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifierImpl());
}
}
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRawValue;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.BeanDescription;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerBuilder;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerModifier;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.SettableBeanProperty;
public class BeanDeserializerModifierImpl extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Iterator<SettableBeanProperty> it = builder.getProperties();
while (it.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty p = it.next();
if (p.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(p.withValueDeserializer(KeepAsJsonDeserialzier.INSTANCE), true);
}
}
return builder;
}
}
This easy solution worked for me:
public class MyObject {
private Object rawJsonValue;
public Object getRawJsonValue() {
return rawJsonValue;
}
public void setRawJsonValue(Object rawJsonValue) {
this.rawJsonValue = rawJsonValue;
}
}
So I was able to store raw value of JSON in rawJsonValue variable and then it was no problem to deserialize it (as object) with other fields back to JSON and send via my REST. Using #JsonRawValue didnt helped me because stored JSON was deserialized as String, not as object, and that was not what I wanted.
This even works in a JPA entity:
private String json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
return json;
}
public void setJson(final String json) {
this.json = json;
}
#JsonProperty(value = "json")
public void setJsonRaw(JsonNode jsonNode) {
// this leads to non-standard json, see discussion:
// setJson(jsonNode.toString());
StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonGenerator generator =
new JsonFactory(objectMapper).createGenerator(stringWriter);
generator.writeTree(n);
setJson(stringWriter.toString());
}
Ideally the ObjectMapper and even JsonFactory are from the context and are configured so as to handle your JSON correctly (standard or with non-standard values like 'Infinity' floats for example).
Here is a full working example of how to use Jackson modules to make #JsonRawValue work both ways (serialization and deserialization):
public class JsonRawValueDeserializerModule extends SimpleModule {
public JsonRawValueDeserializerModule() {
setDeserializerModifier(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier());
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
builder.getProperties().forEachRemaining(property -> {
if (property.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(property.withValueDeserializer(JsonRawValueDeserializer.INSTANCE), true);
}
});
return builder;
}
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
private static final JsonDeserializer<String> INSTANCE = new JsonRawValueDeserializer();
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
return p.readValueAsTree().toString();
}
}
}
Then you can register the module after creating the ObjectMapper:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.registerModule(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModule());
String json = "{\"foo\":\"one\",\"bar\":{\"A\":false}}";
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(json, Pojo.class);
I had the exact same issue.
I found the solution in this post :
Parse JSON tree to plain class using Jackson or its alternatives
Check out the last answer.
By defining a custom setter for the property that takes a JsonNode as parameter and calls the toString method on the jsonNode to set the String property, it all works out.
Using an object works fine both ways... This method has a bit of overhead deserializing the raw value in two times.
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
RawJsonValue value = new RawJsonValue();
value.setRawValue(new RawHello(){{this.data = "universe...";}});
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(value);
System.out.println(json);
RawJsonValue result = mapper.readValue(json, RawJsonValue.class);
json = mapper.writeValueAsString(result.getRawValue());
System.out.println(json);
RawHello hello = mapper.readValue(json, RawHello.class);
System.out.println(hello.data);
RawHello.java
public class RawHello {
public String data;
}
RawJsonValue.java
public class RawJsonValue {
private Object rawValue;
public Object getRawValue() {
return rawValue;
}
public void setRawValue(Object value) {
this.rawValue = value;
}
}
I had a similar problem, but using a list with a lot of JSON itens (List<String>).
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
private List<String> jsons;
}
I managed the serialization using the #JsonRawValue annotation. But for deserialization I had to create a custom deserializer based on Roy's suggestion.
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
#JsonRawValue
#JsonDeserialize(using = JsonListPassThroughDeserialzier.class)
private List<String> jsons;
}
Below you can see my "List" deserializer.
public class JsonListPassThroughDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<List<String>> {
#Override
public List<String> deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext cxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
if (jp.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_ARRAY) {
final List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
while (jp.nextToken() != JsonToken.END_ARRAY) {
list.add(jp.getCodec().readTree(jp).toString());
}
return list;
}
throw cxt.instantiationException(List.class, "Expected Json list");
}
}
In a Spring Boot applicaion with AngularJS frontend, a "Pin" field value has to be blackened on serialization, i.e., if the Pin field value is null in the POJO, the according JSON field has to remain blank; if the field value contains data, it has to be replaced with a "***" string.
Does Jackson provide a feature to get this done?
You can do it easily like following without any Custom Serializer
public class Pojo {
#JsonIgnore
private String pin;
#JsonProperty("pin")
public String getPin() {
if(pin == null) {
return "";
} else {
return "***";
}
}
#JsonProperty("pin")
public void setPin(String pin) {
this.pin = pin;
}
#JsonIgnore
public String getPinValue() {
return pin;
}
}
You can use Pojo.getPinValue() to get the exact value.
Try the following example.
public class Card {
public int id;
public String pin;
}
public class CardSerializer extends StdSerializer<Card> {
public CardSerializer() {
this(null);
}
public CardSerializer(Class<Card> t) {
super(t);
}
#Override
public void serialize(Card value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
jgen.writeStartObject();
jgen.writeNumberField("id", value.id);
jgen.writeStringField("pin", "****");
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
Then you need to register your customer serializer with the ObjectMapper
Card card = new Card(1, "12345");
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.addSerializer(Card.class, new CardSerializer());
mapper.registerModule(module);
String serialized = mapper.writeValueAsString(card);
There are some improvements you can do here like registering the serializer directly on the class, but you can read more about it here Section 4 - http://www.baeldung.com/jackson-custom-serialization
I'm deserializing a large json value. Deeply nested within that value is a json object like the following:
{
"fieldOne": "valueOne",
"fieldTwo": {
"innerField": "innerValue"
}
}
I'm using the Jackson ObjectMapper to deserialize the large json value into a 3rd party class. Deeply nested within that 3rd party class is another 3rd party class:
public class DeepThirdPartyClass {
public String fieldOne;
}
which unfortunately is missing the fieldTwo property. I can create my own class which adds the missing field:
public class MyClass extends DeepThirdPartyClass {
public MySubObject fieldTwo;
}
How do I configure jackson so that whenever it attempts to deserialize a value to DeepThirdPartyClass, it deserializes to MyClass instead?
I had similar requirement when I have to filter any not allowed characters in all String values.
To create Object Mapper:
public class CustomObjectMapper extends ObjectMapper {
public CustomObjectMapper() {
super();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule("HTML XSS Serializer", new Version(1, 0, 0, "FINAL", "com.crowdoptic", "web"));
module.addSerializer(String.class, new JsonHtmlXssSerializer());
module.addDeserializer(String.class, new JsonHtmlXssDeserializer());
this.registerModule(module);
}
}
public class JsonHtmlXssDeserializer extends StdScalarDeserializer<String> {
private static final Logger LOG = LogManager.getLogger(JsonHtmlXssDeserializer.class);
public JsonHtmlXssDeserializer() { super(String.class); }
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
String value = StringDeserializer.instance.deserialize(p, ctxt);
LOG.trace("in deserialize for value: " + value);
String encodedValue = StringEscapeUtils.escapeHtml4(value);
return encodedValue;
}
#Override
public String deserializeWithType(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt, TypeDeserializer typeDeserializer) throws IOException {
return StringDeserializer.instance.deserializeWithType(jp, ctxt, typeDeserializer);
}
#Override
public boolean isCachable() { return StringDeserializer.instance.isCachable(); }
}
In your case you can register your class deserializer, call super method of the object deserializer. Then instead of returning DeepThirdPartyClass, create object of MyClass, set field one from DeepThirdPartyClass and add second field. See StringDeserializer and others for implementation details and available properties.
Let me know if that helps.
I reworked #olga-khylkouskaya's solution to fit my problem:
#Test
public void newDeserializer() throws Exception {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule("DeepThirdPartyClass subclass override", new Version(1, 0, 0, "FINAL", "com.example", "deep-third-party-class-override"));
module.addDeserializer(DeepThirdPartyClass.class, new JsonDeserializer<DeepThirdPartyClass>() {
#Override
public DeepThirdPartyClass deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
return p.readValueAs(MyClass.class);
}
});
objectMapper.registerModule(module);
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
String json = "{\n" +
" \"middle\": {\n" +
" \"fieldOne\": \"valueOne\",\n" +
" \"fieldTwo\": {\n" +
" \"fieldThree\": \"valueThree\"\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}\n";
ThirdPartyClass thirdPartyClass = objectMapper.readValue(json, ThirdPartyClass.class);
}
public class ThirdPartyClass {
public DeepThirdPartyClass middle;
}
public class InnerClass {
public String fieldThree;
}
I have a Class that contains a Map (with non String key) and some other fields.
public class MyClass() {
private Map<KeyObject, OtherObject> map;
private String someField;
public MyClass(Map<KeyObject, OtherObject> map, String someField) {
this.map = map;
this.someField = someField;
}
// Getters & Setters
}
I would like to serialize and deserialize this class using Jackson.
I saw a different ways of doing that and decided to try using jackson modules.
I followed this post and extended JsonDeserializer and JsonSerializer. The problem is that those classes should be typed, so it should look like
public class keyDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<Map<KeyObject, OtherObject>> {
...
}
The same for the KeySerializer.
Then adding to the module:
module.addSerializer(new keySerializer());
module.addDeserializer(Map.class, new keyDeserializer());
But this is wrong apparently since I'm getting an exception:
keySerializer does not define valid handledType() -- must either register with method that takes type argument or make serializer extend 'org.codehaus.jackson.map.ser.std.SerializerBase'
I could have my serializer and deserializer to be typed to MyClass, but then I had to manually parse all of it, which is not reasonable.
UPDATE:
I managed to bypass the module creation in the code by using annotations
#JsonDeserialize(using = keyDeserializer.class)
#JsonSerialize(using = keySerializer.class)
private Map<KeyObject, OtherObject> map;
But then I have to serialize/deserialize the whole map structure on my own from the toString() output. So tried a different annotation:
#JsonDeserialize(keyUsing = MyKeyDeserializer.class)
private Map<KeyObject, OtherObject> map;
Where MyKeyDeserializer extends org.codehaus.jackson.map.KeyDeserializer and overriding the method
public Object deserializeKey(String key, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {...}
Then manually deserializing my key but again from the toString() output of my key class.
This is not optimal (this dependency on the toString() method). Is there a better way?
Ended up using this serializer:
public class MapKeySerializer extends SerializerBase<Object> {
private static final SerializerBase<Object> DEFAULT = new StdKeySerializer();
private static final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
protected MapKeySerializer() {
super(Object.class);
}
#Override
public JsonNode getSchema(SerializerProvider provider, Type typeHint) throws JsonMappingException {
return DEFAULT.getSchema(provider, typeHint);
}
#Override
public void serialize(Object value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException, JsonGenerationException {
if (null == value) {
throw new JsonGenerationException("Could not serialize object to json, input object to serialize is null");
}
StringWriter writer = new StringWriter();
mapper.writeValue(writer, value);
jgen.writeFieldName(writer.toString());
}
}
And this Deserializer:
public class MapKeyDeserializer extends KeyDeserializer {
private static final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
#Override
public Object deserializeKey(String key, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
return mapper.readValue(key, MyObject.class);
}
}
Annotated my Map:
#JsonDeserialize(keyUsing = MapKeyDeserializer.class)
#JsonSerialize(keyUsing = MapKeySerializer.class)
private Map<KeyObject, OtherObject> map;
This is the solution that worked for me, hope this helps other.