I have a text based game that I am making. It is a RPG style where the user is given options linked to numbers and they have to choose a number. Now my problem is that when running the program. A certain method, Decision(), only works certain times. The method is in a superClass while it is being called in the subclass. in the subclass, It works the first time, but not necessarily the second. Also, when I copy the decision method from the superclass into the subclass its starts working, but the next time it is called, it stops. Here is what I've tried and the results. I've included the decision method and where it is being called.
Decision Method:
public int decision(String question, int length, String[] choices){
int[] numbers = new int[length];
int iterator = 1;
for(int i = 0; i < length; i++){
numbers[i] = iterator;
iterator++;
}
boolean done = false;
while(!done){
//print("Test");
print("");
print(question);
String options = "";
for(int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++){
options = (options + numbers[i] + " - " + choices[i] + " ");
}
print(options);
boolean univSet = true;
int entry = 1;
while(univSet){
if(univInt != 0){
univSet = false;
entry = univInt;
univInt = 0;
//print("testing");
}
}
if(entry == 23){
help();
}else{
for(int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++){
if(entry == numbers[i]){
done = true;
univInt = 0;
return entry;
}
}
print("Invalid Number, Try again");
print("");
univInt = 0;
}
}
return (Integer) null;
}
Chapter1 Class (Where it's being called:
public class Chapter1 extends Story implements Serializable {
Player player;
public Chapter1(Player player){
this.player = player;
}
public void engage() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
player.chapter = 1;
save(player.name);
sPrint("Welcome to Chapter 1");
print("You wake up in a lighted room with white walls.\nA fresh breeze is coming through the window yet the air smells rotten.");
print("You jolt up suddenly. You don't remember anything about how you got here. You've even forgotten who you are.");
print("You look down at your white shirt, there is a streak of blood across the top.\nYou are wearing a nametag that says: " + player.name + ".");
print("You're sitting in a chair but there are no restraints. You decide to get up and look around");
cur = decision("What do you do?", 2, new String[]{"Try the door", "Look out the window"});
print(cur + "");
if(cur == 1){
print("You walk over to the door and try and open it, it is unlocked.\nYou walk through and are welcomed by a cold and poorly lit hallway");
}else{
print("You walk to the window and look outside. You see a huge barren field. You can make out a humanoid like structure.\nYou call out yet the figure doesn't move.");
print("You decide to try the door. It's unlocked so you walk through into a cold dimly lit hallway.");
}
print("You see a dull knife on the floor as well as a door on the end of the hallway");
cur = decision("What do you do?", 2, new String[]{"Go to the door", "Take the knife"});
if(cur == 2){
print("You pick up the knife.");
addWeapon("Kitchen Knife", player);
}else{
print("You walk down the hallway to the door when suddenly the door opens and out comes a zombie.\nIt Lunges for your shoulder. You are caught by surprise and it bites into your skin and you are infected");
gameOver();
}
print("You continue to walk down the hall when suddenly a hideous creature lunges out from the door.\nYou jump back and prepare yourself for a battle.");
battle("Zombie", 5, 2, player);
sPrint("I see that you have succeeded in your first encounter with the undead.\nI congratulate you but you have a long way to go. Remember, I am your only way to learning about your past. \nNow, make your way down to the bottom of the tower. I will help you where I see fit along the way.");
print("You look around and see that the lights have brightened up. The zombie has been mutilated by your Kitchen Knife. \nYou don't know where the voice came from but you are scared. Behind the zombie's original hiding spot you see a staircase.\nYou follow it down, onto what seems to be..the 11th floor.");
print("");
print("Please input 'complete' to continue");
pause();
sPrint("Chapter 1 complete");
}
Now in this class, engage() is being called to run this chapter. And decision is being called where you see it, as well as in the battle() method(the battle method loops a couple times and decision() is called every loop.
Originally, both Decision and battle are in the superclass, but not in the sub class. This results in the first decision method in the class to be called, but not the second. In the second, it stops at the loop checking the value of univInt.
When I put the decision method into the sub class, It passes the first two but it fails to get past the first one in the battle method for the same reason.
When I put both the decision and battle method into the sub class, it has the same result as just putting decision.
Finally if I put battle in the sub class but not decision it only passes the first two again.
In the project I have one variable named cur that holds the integer value of whatever decision returns. I reuse it for every decision. I don't know if that has anything to do with it. This really doesn't make sense to me how whether the methods are in the same class, or inherited would matter at all if they are the same method.
I am ready to clarify anything and I hope someone is able to understand what is going wrong.
EDIT:
univInt is being set to another number other than 0 outside of decision. thats why it works some times. It is a swing class and a method in a superclass sets univInt to whatever is in a TextField when a button is pressed so with that while loop I try to constantly check to see univInt has been changed from 0
It seems like your "univInt" is a class member, not a local variable, and you do not reinitialize it when entering the function. Thus it won't be changed back to allow the program to enter the if-statement you mention.
Related
I am building a simple game of 21. Everything comes together okay, but when I click on the Button that I have assigned to my 'Stand' function, none of the if-statement blocks trigger event though I am meeting conditions of one or the other depending on what cards have already been dealt. I have tested all variations of the statements and I want to have some insight, or a second pair of eyes to see something I do not.
I have tested the function multiple times, and re-written it multiple times. I've tested the function with just that statement present, and it still does not trigger.
This is the function in question:
//when player hits stand button
public void Stand(TextField playerNum, TextField dealerNum, TilePane b, Button hit, Button stand, Button deal, TextField handsLostNum, TextField handsWonNum) {
//obtain current final scores when player stands
playerFinal = Integer.parseInt(playerNum.getText());
dealerFinal = Integer.parseInt(dealerNum.getText());
if (playerFinal > dealerFinal) {
hit.setVisible(false);
stand.setVisible(false);
deal.setVisible(true);
playerNum.setText("YOU WIN!");
dealerNum.setText("YOU WIN!");
handsWon += 1;
String temp = Integer.toString(handsWon);
handsWonNum.setText(temp);
}
if (dealerFinal > playerFinal) {
hit.setVisible(false);
stand.setVisible(false);
deal.setVisible(true);
playerNum.setText("YOU LOSE!");
dealerNum.setText("YOU LOSE!");
handsLost += 1;
String temp = Integer.toString(handsLost);
handsLostNum.setText(temp);
}
if (dealerFinal == playerFinal) {
playerNum.setText("DRAW! PLAY AGAIN!");
dealerNum.setText("DRAW! PLAY AGAIN!");
hit.setVisible(false);
stand.setVisible(false);
deal.setVisible(true);
}
handsWon = 0;
handsLost = 0;
} //END STAND METHOD
And the condition that helps to meet it is here:
//method to add scores to text fields
public void addScores(int pScore, int dScore, TextField playerNum, TextField dealerNum) {
//ADD PLAYER SCORE
String playerScore = playerNum.getText();
int playerCurrent = Integer.parseInt(playerScore);
int newCurrent = playerCurrent + dScore;
String newScore = Integer.toString(newCurrent);
playerNum.setText(newScore);
//ADD DEALER SCORE
String dealerScore = dealerNum.getText();
int dealerCurrent = Integer.parseInt(dealerScore);
int newDealCurrent = dealerCurrent + pScore;
String newDealScore = Integer.toString(newDealCurrent);
dealerNum.setText(newDealScore);
}
I add the scores to text fields and then pull them again later in the project. Yet, even when the values are meeting the conditions of being larger than the opponents value, the statement does not trigger.
The expected result is when I click on the 'Stand' button, the statement is triggered and then the variable that adds to the total tally is activated.
Try putting System.out in every step to check if it is actually getting there. Put one as the first statement in the Stand method like: System.out.println("In Stand method");
Then put more of those before the if statements and inside them like:
System.out.format("Before: playerFinal : %s, dealerFinal: %s, playerFinal > dealerFinal: %d %n", playerFinal, dealerFinal, playerFinal > dealerFinal);
if (playerFinal > dealerFinal) {
System.out.format("In: playerFinal : %s, dealerFinal: %s, playerFinal > dealerFinal: %d %n", playerFinal, dealerFinal, playerFinal > dealerFinal);
Do that for each of the methods, to see if that method is actually running and what the values are.
If you see that the if statements are executing and the flow going into them, but you don't see any changes on the GUI elements, then try using:
Platform.runLater(() -> {
// Your GUI changes code
playerNum.setText("YOU WIN!");
dealerNum.setText("YOU WIN!");
});
Platform.runLater receives a runnable as an argument, and is the right way to update the GUI if you are using JavaFX.
Sometimes you may save the file and run it and the IDE would not actually compile it, running the old code. In that case, you can try restarting the IDE and trying again.
I am working on a card game and I'm facing a problem regarding the gameplay. So basically the rules of the game are that who finishes the hand first gets placed first, second second and so on. I am keeping a list of the players in a List<Player, and if one finishes I just skip the turn from him (checks if >= 1 cards in hand), until 1 player is left. Now, the rule is that if one finishes with an unbeatable card/move or everyone else passes for example, the turn should be to the next player and he is free to make a move. I've been struggling and haven't found a proper solution yet. How to achieve this?
I am currently saving the waste (last played list of cards) cards into a List<Card>, and I am keeping a Player instance lastPlayed for the last playing player, and a Player instance hasTurn for the current player on turn.
The turns are shifted in this method inside the Game class:
public void determineNextPlayerTurn()
{
if(playersLeft() > 1)
{
int i = players.indexOf(hasTurn) + 1;
if(i == 4)
i = 0;
hasTurn = players.get(i);
if(hasTurn.isPlaying())
{
if(!isHumanTurn())
{
display.disableButtons();
AI temp = (AI)players.get(i);
temp.onPlayerTurn(this);
}
else
display.enableButtons();
}
else
{
determineNextPlayerTurn();
}
}
else
newGame(0);
The method of AI that is called when it is an ai's turn:
public void onPlayerTurn(Game game)
{
selectCardsToPlay(game.getWaste(), game.getLastPlayedPlayer());
if(getSelectedCards().isEmpty())
{
game.determineNextPlayerTurn();
}
else
{
if(Moves.canBePlayed(getSelectedCards(), game.getWaste(), this, game.getLastPlayedPlayer()))
{
playMove(game);
game.determineNextPlayerTurn();
}
else
game.determineNextPlayerTurn();
}
}
While for the user, nothing is called as the determineNextPlayerTurn() is called within the ActionListener of the playing buttons (Play, Pass).
Note: Currently like this, if the scenario occurs with the human last playing there will be a stackoverflow for the reason that every ai is doing a Pass. Every other code is fine for now, but I need help with implementing a simple solution to that specific case, and if I am doing something wrong I am open.
Why don't you have a counter for the number of "passes" that are executed and then compare that to the number of players. If the passes are equal to the number of players - 1 then that would mean that following player should be free to make a move. Also what is an "unbeatable move" if there is such a thing then wouldn't you be able to classify the turn as that and then attach a boolean that checks the player for whether or not they have made one of these types of moves?
In the land of Puzzlevania, Aaron, Bob, and Charlie had an argument over which
one of them was the greatest puzzler of all time.
To end the argument once and
for all, they agreed on a duel to the death.
Aaron was a poor shooter and only hit
his target with a probability of 1>3.
Bob was a bit better and hit his target with a
probability of 1>2.
Charlie was an expert marksman and never missed. A hit means
a kill and the person hit drops out of the duel.
To compensate for the inequities in their marksmanship skills, the three decided
that they would fire in turns, starting with Aaron, followed by Bob, and then by
Charlie. The cycle would repeat until there was one man standing, and that man
would be the Greatest Puzzler of All Time.
An obvious and reasonable strategy is for each man to shoot at the most accurate
shooter still alive, on the grounds that this shooter is the deadliest and has the best
chance of hitting back.Write a program to simulate the duel using this strategy.
Your program should use
random numbers and the probabilities given in the problem to determine whether
a shooter hits the target.
Create a class named Duelist that contains the dueler’s
name and shooting accuracy, a Boolean indicating whether the dueler is still alive,
and a method ShootAtTarget ( Duelist target ) that sets the target to dead if
the dueler hits his target (using a random number and the shooting accuracy) and
does nothing otherwise.
Once you can simulate a single duel, add a loop to your program that simulates
10,000 duels. Count the number of times that each contestant wins and print the
probability of winning for each contestant (e.g., for Aaron your program might
output “Aaron won 3,595>10,000 duels or 35.95%”).
An alternate strategy is for Aaron to intentionally miss on his first shot. Modify the
program to accommodate this new strategy and output the probability of winning
for each contestant.
Which strategy is better for Aaron: to intentionally miss on the
first shot or to try and hit the best shooter? Who has the best chance of winning,
the best shooter or the worst shooter?
Ok so that the problem. Here is my code so far:
public class Duelist {
private String name;
private double probabilityOfHitting;
private boolean alive = true;
//Only declared instance variables. Must created setters and getters
public void setName(String newName){
name = newName;
}
//name setter created
public void setProbabilityOfHitting( double newProbabilityOfHitting){
probabilityOfHitting = newProbabilityOfHitting;
}
//probability of hitting setter created
public void setAlive(boolean newAlive){
alive = newAlive;
}
//name setter created
//now must create getters
public String getName(){
return name;
}
//created the name getter
public double getProbabilityOfHitting(){
return probabilityOfHitting;
}
//created the probability of hitting getter
public boolean getAlive(){
return alive;
}
//created the alive getter
//no constructors created before
public Duelist(String tempName, double tempProbability){
name = tempName;
probabilityOfHitting = tempProbability;
}
//constructor is now created
//need to create a method for the duelists to shoot at each other
public void shootAtTarget(Duelist target){
double randomNum = Math.random();
if (this.probabilityOfHitting ==1){
target.setAlive(false);
target.getAlive();
}
else if (randomNum <= this.probabilityOfHitting){
target.setAlive(false);
target.getAlive();
}
else {
target.getAlive();
}
}
}
public class Tester {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int winsA = 0;
int winsB = 0;
int winsC = 0;
Duelist aaron = new Duelist("Aaron",(1/3));
Duelist bob = new Duelist("Bob", (1/2));
Duelist charlie = new Duelist("Charlie", 1);
if(aaron.getAlive() == true){
if(charlie.getAlive()== true){
aaron.shootAtTarget(charlie);
}
else if(bob.getAlive() == true){
aaron.shootAtTarget(bob);
}
else{
winsA++;
}
}
else if(bob.getAlive() == true){
if(charlie.getAlive() == true){
bob.shootAtTarget(charlie);
}
else if(aaron.getAlive() == true){
bob.shootAtTarget(aaron);
}
else{
winsB++;
}
}
else{
if (bob.getAlive() == true){
charlie.shootAtTarget(bob);
}
else if(aaron.getAlive() == true){
charlie.shootAtTarget(aaron);
}
else{
winsC++;
}
}
System.out.println(winsA);
System.out.println(winsB);
System.out.println(winsC);
}
}
I know I haven't gotten close to finishing the problem yet. What I did in my tester class was to try and simulate one duel and once when I simulated one duel, I would be able to loop it so I can simulate more. The problem I'm having is that the when I run the code, the wins for Aaron, Bob, and Charlie all come up to 0 and I don't know why.
As the last parameter in the constructor calls, you wrote
Duelist aaron = new Duelist("Aaron",(1/3));
There you are dividing an int by another int, and the result will be 0 in this case. This has to be changed to
Duelist aaron = new Duelist("Aaron",(1.0/3.0));
so that double values are used (and the result will be 0.3333, as desired).
Most of your Duelist class does not seem to be "wrong", but the shootAtTarget method could be improved.
A general hint: I'd recommend you to never use Math.random(). This will deliver unpredictable results. Instead, you should use an instance of java.util.Random. This can be initialized with a certain random seed, so that it always provides the same sequence of random numbers. This makes debugging much easier.
Additonally, some tests have been redundant. When the probabilityOfHitting is 1.0, then there is no special test required: The random number will always be less-than-or-equal to 1.0. You are also occasionally calling target.getAlive() for no apparent reason.
So in the end, the method could look like this:
private static Random random = new Random(0);
//need to create a method for the duelists to shoot at each other
public void shootAtTarget(Duelist target)
{
double randomNum = random.nextDouble();
if (randomNum <= this.probabilityOfHitting)
{
target.setAlive(false);
}
}
However, the main problem was in your Test class. I'm not sure about general recommendations here. One could go very far in terms of abstraction. (A Java Enterprise Architect would probably end up with writing a AbstractDuelistStrategyFactory somewhere...). But to put it simply: At the moment, you are doing at most one shot. After one shot, nobody can have won. And you don't know how many shots have to be taken before there is only one duelist remaining.
Much of this could be made more elegant and flexible if you placed the Duelists into a List<Duelist>. But without that, an approach that is "structurally close to what you started" could look like this:
int alive = 3;
while (alive > 1)
{
System.out.println("Status: A:"+aaron.getAlive()+" B:"+bob.getAlive()+" C:"+charlie.getAlive());
if (aaron.getAlive())
{
if(charlie.getAlive())
{
System.out.println("A shoots at C");
aaron.shootAtTarget(charlie);
if (!charlie.getAlive())
{
System.out.println("A killed C");
alive--;
}
}
else if(bob.getAlive())
{
System.out.println("A shoots at B");
aaron.shootAtTarget(bob);
if (!bob.getAlive())
{
System.out.println("A killed B");
alive--;
}
}
}
// Other cases ...
}
if (aaron.getAlive())
{
winsA++;
}
if (bob.getAlive())
{
winsB++;
}
if (charlie.getAlive())
{
winsC++;
}
(Note that there are still cases missing!)
I created two methods for my Bingo Game in Java. One method creates a new board which populates the Bingo Board with integers according to the Bingo rule (1-75). My second method generates random numbers with a range of 1 - 75.
public static int drawNum(){
Random rand = new Random();
int num = rand.nextInt(75)+1;
return num;
}
public static void bingoCard(){
int [][]card=new int [5][5];
ArrayList<Integer> alreadyUsed = new ArrayList<Integer>();
boolean valid = false;
int tmp = 0;
for(int i = 0; i <= 4; i++){
for(int row = 0; row < card.length; row++){
while(!valid){
tmp = (int)(Math.random() * 15) + 1 + 15 * i;
if(!alreadyUsed.contains(tmp)){
valid = true;
alreadyUsed.add(tmp);
}
}
card[row][i] = tmp;
valid = false;
}
}
card[2][2] = 0;
//create array to make title.
String title []={"B","I","N","G","O"};
for(int i=0;i<title.length;i++){
System.out.print(title[i]+ "\t");
}
System.out.println();
for(int row=0;row<card.length;row++){
for(int col=0;col<card[row].length;col++){
System.out.print(card[row][col]+ "\t");
}
System.out.println();
}
}
What I need help with is, how do I check whether or not the drawNum() method corresponds to any values stored inside my bingoCard() array? If so, print out a new array with the integers filled in. If the condition is met for a bingo, then you win.
I hope I don't make it sound like I want you to do it for me, but I am confused as to how to start coding that part. Thank you.
This my recommendation - Learn Object Oriented Programming immediately
I see you are using objects provided in the JDK, so why not learn to make your own?
Make two classes with the following methods (-) and members (+) (PS. This is not a formal way to document code)
BingoCard
+list of numbers on card
-reset() : gets new numbers for this card
-test(BingoDrawer) : Tests to see if this card won on this drawing
-toString() : returns a String representation of this card
BingoDrawer
+list of numbers drawn
-reset() : draws new numbers
-hasNumber(int number) : tests if this number was drawn
-toString() : returns a String representation of this drawing
One more suggestions
Instead of keeping track of what you used, keep track of what you have not used, it will make things much easier because you can just choose stuff from that list randomly. Unlike your current action which is choosing (a logical number) from thin air and hoping (which causes issues) it is not a collision
If you follow my recommendation you can write code like this
public static void main(String[] args) {
BingoCard bc = new BingoCard();
BingoDrawer bd = new BingoDrawer();
while(thePlayerWantsToPlay()) { //function to be defined by you
bc.reset();
bd.reset();
System.out.println(bc);
System.out.println(bd);
System.out.println(bc.test(bd));
}
}
You can take it a step further and make a BingoGame class and do what I did in main there and just create an instance of BingoGame and call some start method on the object.
For checking if you have the number in your board, read through the board in a similar manner as you do for the already_used numbers, except with the number the user just entered.
The conditions for the user to win should be checked after the board has another number guessed.
There are a few ways to do this, a simple one would be to iterate over every possible pattern that could win, checking to see if there are tokens there.
All of this would be in a loop, that goes a little like this:
Set up board via user entering numbers.
Start loop
set either a timer to wait for, or wait for a keypress (so the game doesn't just play really fast)
Get random number
Possibly add to board
Check if winner
if winner, break the loop and do something else.
Print the new board out.
(end of loop)
If they got here, that could mean they won!
Wait to exit
You can just write it out as pseudo-code and fill in the methods after that. It usually helps to work on these things in a top-down fashion. So, for bingo you might have:
board = generateBoard();
while (!bingoFound(board)) {
number = drawNumber();
board = stampNumbers(board, number);
}
If that makes sense, you can go a step deeper and define each method. For example, bingoFound might look like:
public boolean bingoFound(int[][] board) {
boolean wasFound = bingoRowFound(board)
|| bingoColFound(board)
|| bingoDiagonalFound(board);
return wasFound;
}
Again, I've defined everything in (mostly) pseudo-code. If this looks ok, you can move a step deeper. Let's define the bingoRowFound method.
public boolean bingoRowFound(int[][] board) {
for (int row = 0; row < NUM_ROWS; row++) {
boolean rowIsABingo = true;
for (int col = 0; col < NUM_COLS; col++) {
// We have to check that everything up until this point has
// been marked off. I am using -1 to indicate that a spot has
// been marked.
rowIsABingo = rowIsABingo && board[row][col] == -1;
}
if (rowIsABingo) { return rowIsABingo; }
}
return false; // If we didn't find a bingo, return false.
}
Some of the methods (like drawNumber) will be really easy to implement. Others, like looking for a diagonal bingo might be a bit more difficult.
Feb 12 2014 Update:
Retracted code, since this was a college course assignment, and I want to prevent people just copying the code. I almost got in trouble for being accused of sharing code (which is a nono in assignments) when another student lifted my code from my Github repo and sent it in as their own.
There were two classes, one main class and a class to hold my methods and constructors.
BINGOFINAL.java was my main class.
Bingo_Card.java held my constructor and methods.
If you want to run this, make sure you create a new project called BINGOFINAL, and put Bingo_Card.java into that same */src/ extension.
Java newbie here. I have multiple while loops. All separated thinking that it would just go down in order until the while condition equals true. What my output suggests is that it does the first while loop it finds that is true then exits, with out looking at the others. Please advise if there is a better way doing this or if you see an obvious error. Sample output from (xCar =3, yCar =3) and Destination = (1,1) is just "West" "West". There should be 2 "South". *Please excuse the print statements, I was trying to debug what it was doing. I should also point out that I can only move the 'car' one spot then need to report back the direction.
if (car.getLocation().equals(car.getDestination())){
System.out.println("inside this if statement");
System.out.println(car.nextMove().NOWHERE);
}
//Seeing if Xcar is greater than Xdest. If so moving west
while (car.getxCar() > xDestination){
System.out.println("2nd if statement");
System.out.println(car.nextMove().WEST);
}
//Seeing if Xcar is less than Xdest. If so moving east
while (car.getxCar() < xDestination){
//System.out.println("3rd");
System.out.println(car.nextMove().EAST);
}
//Seeing if Ycar is greater than Ydest. If so moving south
while (car.getyCar() > yDestination){
System.out.println("4th");
System.out.println(car.nextMove().SOUTH);
}
//Seeing if Ycar is less than Ydest. If so moving north
while (car.getyCar() < yDestination){
System.out.println("5th");
System.out.println(car.nextMove().NORTH);
}
METHOD nextMove() it is calling a enum in class Direction
public Direction nextMove() {
if (xCar < xDestination){
xCar = xCar + car.x+ 1;
}
if (xCar > xDestination){
xCar = xCar + car.x -1;
}
if (yCar < yDestination){
yCar = yCar + car.y +1;
}
if (yCar > yDestination){
yCar = yCar + car.y -1;
}
return null;
Output
Car [id = car17, location = [x=3, y=3], destination = [x=1, y=1]]
2nd if statement
WEST
2nd if statement
WEST
What is happening is this:
In your first while loop you call your nextMove() method. This method is incrementing both x and y in your first loop, hence why you don't get the output of the other while loops. If you changed your input destination to [3,4] you should get output of WEST,WEST,SOUTH
You could fix this so that only one of the dimensions is incremented at a time in your nextMove() method by changing them to else if like this
public Direction nextMove() {
if (xCar < xDestination){
xCar = xCar + car.x+ 1;
}
else if (xCar > xDestination){
xCar = xCar + car.x -1;
}
else if (yCar < yDestination){
yCar = yCar + car.y +1;
}
else if (yCar > yDestination){
yCar = yCar + car.y -1;
}
return null;
I would not make a new class here. You only need a method to do the moving which can be created in the same file as the main function. If you really want a class to move the car then you need to declare it correctly. Remember, a Class requires a public, private and a constructor as well as all of the methods the class can do. It would also be easy to put the moving methods inside the car class since part of the car class should hold the location of the car object. I don't know if you want it to move across a screen or just change the location. If you want to move across the screen the while loops will work. But if all you need is for the location to change, then it would be much easier to change a private variable holding the location of the car; it will be easier to code and to run since evaluating booleans takes a sizable amount of computation time. Good luck. Let me know if you didn't understand anything.