package staticassignment3;
public class Booking {
private String customerEmail;
private int seatsRequired;
private static int seatsAvailable;
private boolean isBooked;
static {
seatsAvailable = 400;
}
public Booking(String customerEmail, int seatsRequired) {
this.customerEmail = customerEmail;
this.seatsRequired = seatsRequired;
}
public String getCustomerEmail() {
return this.customerEmail;
}
public void setCustomerEmail(String customerEmail) {
this.customerEmail= customerEmail;
}
public int getSeatsRequired() {
return this.seatsRequired;
}
public void setSeatsRequired(int seatsRequired) {
this.seatsRequired = seatsRequired;
}
public static int getSeatsAvailable() {
return Booking.seatsAvailable;
}
public static void setSeatsAvailable(int seatsAvailable) {
Booking.seatsAvailable = Booking.seatsAvailable - this.seatsRequired;
}
public boolean isBooked() {
if(Booking.seatsAvailable>= this.seatsRequired) {
Booking.setSeatsAvailable(seatsAvailable);
this.isBooked = true;
}
else {
this.isBooked = false;
}
return isBooked;
}
}
In the above Booking class, I want to update the static variable seatsAvailable by using the static method setSeatsAvailable but I am passing a nonstatic variable in it i.e this.seatsRequired which is not permitted. Is there any alternative to update the seatsAvailable without changing the code so much?
package staticassignment3;
public class Tester {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Booking booking1 = new Booking("jack#email.com", 100);
Booking booking2 = new Booking("jill#email.com", 350);
Booking[] bookings = { booking1, booking2 };
for (Booking booking : bookings) {
if (booking.isBooked()) {
System.out.println(booking.getSeatsRequired()+" seats successfully booked for "+booking.getCustomerEmail());
} else {
System.out.println("Sorry "+booking.getCustomerEmail()+", required number of seats are not available!");
System.out.println("Seats available: "+Booking.getSeatsAvailable());
}
}
}
}
in above Booking class i want to update seatsAvailable static variable by using setSeatsAvailable static method but i am passing nonstatic varible in it i.e this.seatsRequired which is not permitted.is there any alternate to achive the updated seatsAvailable static varibale without doing major changes in code
When calling a static method, there is no assocated object instance. So, it is not valid to use this inside a static method, since this refers to the current object (but you have none).
Specfically, this method isn't correct:
public static void setSeatsAvailable(int seatsAvailable) {
Booking.seatsAvailable = Booking.seatsAvailable - this.seatsRequired;
}
If you want to keep the method static, you could pass an additional parameter to the method – an instance of Booking – and then replace this.seatsRequired with booking.seatsRequired, like this:
public static void setSeatsAvailable(int seatsAvailable, Booking booking) {
Booking.seatsAvailable = Booking.seatsAvailable - booking.seatsRequired;
}
Hi i am trying to solve the problem I am facing
public class exam {
public static void main(String[] args) {
test1 a = new test1();
}
int zahl(int x, int y) {
int e;
if(x>y) {
e=x-y;
}else {
e=y-x;
}
if(e==0) {
return 0;
}
int z=0;
int i=1;
while(i<=e) {
z=z+i;
i++;
}
return z;
}
}
what I want to do is to call the zahl method to the test1 class
public class test1{
private exam b;
public void init() {
b = new exam();
}
void test() {
int result = b.zahl(2, 2);
assertEquals(1, result);
}
}
this is what I have tried, but it returns nothing, even though it's supposed to show me error.
You should probably be declaring your functions with the public tag i.e. public void test() if you intend to access them from other functions outside of that package. The usual Class naming convention in Java is with capital first letter, which makes your code more readable for you and others.
For your question, I don't think you are actually invoking the test() method of the test1 class. If you want that method to get called every time, you could place it inside the default Constructor.
class X {
private int i;
private X(){}
X factory(int v){ // d
X r = new X();
r.i = v;
return r;
}
}
How can we create an instance of X using this part of codes? I can think of reflection but I think that is too complex. Is there any simpler way to figure out this problem? (Do not add static to factory method and do not delete the private key word of the constructor method).
You may use a builder inner class like this (main method added for testing purpose, of course you could call X.Builder from outside this class) :
class X {
private int i;
private X() {
}
public static class Builder {
public static X factory(final int v) { // d
X r = new X();
r.i = v;
return r;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
X myX = X.Builder.factory(42);
}
}
Can anyone tell me how to count the number of instances of a class?
Here's my code
public class Bicycle {
//instance variables
public int gear, speed, seatHeight;
public String color;
//constructor
public Bicycle(int gear, int speed, int seatHeight, String color) {
gear = 0;
speed = 0;
seatHeight = 0;
color ="Unknown";
}
//getters and setters
public int getGear() {
return gear;
}
public void setGear(int Gear) {
this.gear = Gear;
}
public int getSpeed() {
return speed;
}
public void setSpeed(int Speed){
this.speed = Speed;
}
public int getSeatHeight() {
return seatHeight;
}
public void setSeatHeight(int SeatHeight) {
this.seatHeight = SeatHeight;
}
public String getColor() {
return color;
}
public void setColor(String Color) {
this.color = Color;
}
}//end class
public class Variable extends Bicycle {
public Variable(int gear, int speed, int seatHeight, String color) {
super(gear, speed, seatHeight, color);
}
}//end class
public class Tester {
public static void main(String args[]){
Bicycle bicycle1 = new Bicycle(0, 0, 0, null);
bicycle1.setColor("red");
System.out.println("Color: "+bicycle1.getColor());
bicycle1.setSeatHeight(4);
System.out.println("Seat Height: "+bicycle1.getSeatHeight());
bicycle1.setSpeed(10);
System.out.println("Speed: "+bicycle1.getSpeed());
bicycle1.setGear(6);
System.out.println("Gear: "+bicycle1.getGear());
System.out.println("");//space
Bicycle bicycle2 = new Bicycle(0, 0, 0, null);
bicycle2.setColor("black");
System.out.println("Color: "+bicycle2.getColor());
bicycle2.setSeatHeight(6);
System.out.println("Seat Height: "+bicycle2.getSeatHeight());
bicycle2.setSpeed(12);
System.out.println("Speed: "+bicycle2.getSpeed());
bicycle2.setGear(6);
System.out.println("Gear: "+bicycle2.getGear());
System.out.println("");//space
}//end method
}//end class
The class variable is to be used to keep count of the number of instances of the Bicycle class created and the tester class creates a number of instances of the Bicycle class and demonstrates the workings of the Bicycle class and the class variable. I've looked all over the internet and I can't seem to find anything, could someone show me how to do it please, thanks in advance :)
Since static variables are initialized only once, and they're shared between all instances, you can:
class MyClass {
private static int counter;
public MyClass() {
//...
counter++;
}
public static int getNumOfInstances() {
return counter;
}
}
and to access the static field counter you can use MyClass.getNumOfInstances()
Read more about static fields in the JLS - 8.3.1.1. static Fields:
If a field is declared static, there exists exactly one incarnation of the field, no matter how many instances (possibly zero) of the class may eventually be created. A static field, sometimes called a class variable, is incarnated when the class is initialized (§12.4).
Note that counter is implicitly set to zero
Pleae try the tool of java
jmap -histo <PDID>
Out put
num #instances #bytes class name
----------------------------------------------
1: 1105141 97252408 java.lang.reflect.Method
2: 3603562 86485488 java.lang.Double
3: 1191098 28586352 java.lang.String
4: 191694 27035744 [C
In addition, you should override finalize method to decrement the counter
public class Bicycle {
...
public static int instances = 0;
{
++instances; //separate counting from constructor
}
...
public Bicycle(int gear, int speed, int seatHeight, String color) {
gear = 0;
speed = 0;
seatHeight = 0;
color ="Unknown";
}
#Override
protected void finalize() {
super.finalize();
--instances;
}
}
You should have in mind that static variables are CLASS scoped (there is no one for each instance, only one per class)
Then, you could demonstrate instance decrement with:
...
System.out.println("Count:" + Bicycle.getNumOfInstances()); // 2
bicycle1 = null;
bicycle2 = null;
System.gc(); // not guaranteed to collect but it will in this case
Thread.sleep(2000); // you expect to check again after some time
System.out.println("Count again:" + Bicycle.getNumOfInstances()); // 0
why not using a static counter?
public class Bicycle {
private static int instanceCounter = 0;
//instance variables
public int gear, speed, seatHeight;
public String color;
//constructor
public Bicycle(int gear, int speed, int seatHeight, String color) {
gear = 0;
speed = 0;
seatHeight = 0;
color ="Unknown";
instanceCounter++;
}
public int countInstances(){
return instanceCounter;
}
........
You just need static counter in class.
public class Bicycle {
private static volatile int instanceCounter;
public Bicycle() {
instanceConter++;
}
public static int getNumOfInstances() {
return instanceCounter;
}
protected void finalize() {
instanceCounter--;
}
}
As mentioned in many comments finalize() is not recommended to use so there could be another approach to count the Bicycle instances -
public class Bicycle {
private static final List<PhantomReference<Bicycle>> phantomReferences = new LinkedList<PhantomReference<Bicycle>>();
private static final ReferenceQueue<Bicycle> referenceQueue = new ReferenceQueue<Bicycle>();
private static final Object lock = new Object();
private static volatile int counter;
private static final Runnable referenceCleaner = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (true) {
try {
cleanReferences();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
};
static {
Thread t = new Thread(referenceCleaner);
t.setDaemon(true);
t.start();
}
private Bicycle() {
}
public static Bicycle getNewBicycle() {
Bicycle bicycle = new Bicycle();
counter++;
synchronized (lock) {
phantomReferences.add(new PhantomReference<Bicycle>(new Bicycle(), referenceQueue));
}
System.out.println("Bicycle added to heap, count: " + counter);
return bicycle;
}
private static void cleanReferences() {
try {
PhantomReference reference = (PhantomReference) referenceQueue.remove();
counter--;
synchronized (lock) {
phantomReferences.remove(reference);
}
System.out.println("Bicycle removed from heap, count: " + counter);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static int getNumOfBicycles() {
return counter;
}
}
public class BicycleTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int i = 0;
while (i++ < 1000) {
Bicycle.getNewBicycle();
}
while (Bicycle.getNumOfBicycles() > 0) {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.gc(); // just a request
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
Alternatively, you can create a counter with an initializer block and a static variable.
class SomeClass
{
private static int instanceCounter;
{
instanceCounter++;
}
}
Initializer blocks get copied by the compiler into every constructor, so, you will have to write it once no matter how many constructors you will need (As referred into the above link). The block in {} runs every time you create a new object of the class and increases the variable counter by one.
And of course get the counter by something like:
public static int getInstanceCounter()
{
return instanceCounter;
}
or directly
int numOfInstances = SomeClass.instanceCounter;
If you do not make numOfInstances private
One basic approach is to declare a static numeric member field thats incremented each time the constructor is invoked.
public class Bicycle {
//instance variables
public int gear, speed, seatHeight;
public String color;
public static int bicycleCount = 0;
//constructor
public Bicycle(int gear, int speed, int seatHeight, String color) {
gear = 0;
speed = 0;
seatHeight = 0;
color ="Unknown";
bicycleCount++;
}
...
}
If you want to count and test instances based on the number of objects created, you can use a loop to see what really is happening. Create a constructor and use a static counter
public class CountInstances {
public static int count;
public CountInstances() {
count++;
}
public int getInstaces() {
return count;
}
public static void main(String []args) {
for(int i= 0; i<10; i++) {
new CountInstances();
}
System.out.println(CountInstances.count);
}
}
public class Number_Objects {
static int count=0;
Number_Objects(){
count++;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Number_Objects ob1=new Number_Objects();
Number_Objects ob2=new Number_Objects();
Number_Objects obj3=new Number_Objects();
System.out.print("Number of objects created :"+count);
}
}
I'm working on program/game where I have static utility class with params.
class ParamsGeneral {
public static final int H_FACTOR = 100;
public static int MAX_SCORE = 1000;
...
}
then I need to override this values in some specific cases, for example playing on map with limited score. So I did following:
class ParamsLimited extends ParamsGeneral {
public static int MAX_SCORE = 500;
// other params stay same
}
And the intended usage is following:
class Player {
ParamsGeneral par;
public Player() {
if(onLimitedMap()){
par = new ParamLimited();
}
}
public boolean isWinner() {
if(this.score == par.MAX_SCORE) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
I haven't actually tested this code, because IDE is complaining about calling static field through instance and also about field hiding. I clearly see that this code is stinks, so is there a way to achieve this or do I have to write each param class separately?
PS: I know I shoud make the default class abstract and use getters, I'm just curious if there is a way to make the values accesible statically.
You cannot override static members - in Java, neither methods nor fields could be overriden. However, in this case it does not look like you need to do any of that: since you have an instance of ParamsGeneral in the par variable, a non-static method would do what you need with the regular override.
class ParamsGeneral {
public int getMaxScore() {
return 1000;
}
}
class ParamsLimited extends ParamsGeneral {
#Override public int getMaxScore() {
return 500;
}
}
...
public boolean isWinner() {
// You do not need an "if" statement, because
// the == operator already gives you a boolean:
return this.score == par.getMaxScore();
}
I wouldn't use subclassing for a general game vs a limited game. I would use an enumeration, like:
public enum Scores {
GENERAL (1000),
LIMITED (500),
UNLIMITED (Integer.MAX_INT);
private int score;
private Scores(int score) { this.score = score; }
public int getScore() { return score; }
}
Then, when constructing a game, you can do:
Params generalParams = new Params(Scores.GENERAL);
Params limitedParams = new Params(Scores.LIMITED);
And so forth.
Doing it this way allows you to change the nature of your game while keeping your values centralized. Imagine if for every type of parameter you think of you have to create a new class. It could get very complicated, you could have hundreds of classes!
Simplest solution is to do this:
class ParamsGeneral {
public static final int H_FACTOR = 100;
public static final int MAX_SCORE = 1000;
public static final int MAX_SCORE_LIMITED = 500;
...
}
class Player {
int maxScore;
public Player() {
if(onLimitedMap()){
maxScore = ParamsGeneral.MAX_SCORE_LIMITED;
}
else {
maxScore = ParamsGeneral.MAX_SCORE;
}
}
public boolean isWinner() {
if(this.score == this.maxScore) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
No need to have an instance of ParamsGeneral, it is just a collection of static definitions for your game.
Have MAX_SCORE be private static with public static getters; then you can call ParamsGeneral.getMaxScore and ParamsLimited.getMaxScore and you'll get 1000 and 500 respectively