Hi i am trying to solve the problem I am facing
public class exam {
public static void main(String[] args) {
test1 a = new test1();
}
int zahl(int x, int y) {
int e;
if(x>y) {
e=x-y;
}else {
e=y-x;
}
if(e==0) {
return 0;
}
int z=0;
int i=1;
while(i<=e) {
z=z+i;
i++;
}
return z;
}
}
what I want to do is to call the zahl method to the test1 class
public class test1{
private exam b;
public void init() {
b = new exam();
}
void test() {
int result = b.zahl(2, 2);
assertEquals(1, result);
}
}
this is what I have tried, but it returns nothing, even though it's supposed to show me error.
You should probably be declaring your functions with the public tag i.e. public void test() if you intend to access them from other functions outside of that package. The usual Class naming convention in Java is with capital first letter, which makes your code more readable for you and others.
For your question, I don't think you are actually invoking the test() method of the test1 class. If you want that method to get called every time, you could place it inside the default Constructor.
Related
I'm searching for modifier in Java that has the same exact purpose as Static in C++ has. I mean, that variable is only initialized once in function, then every time we call that function again, values from the previous call are saved. That's how code looks in C++:
void counter()
{
static int count=0;
cout << count++;
}
int main()
{
for(int i=0;i<5;i++)
{
counter();
}
}
and the output should be 0 1 2 3 4, is there something that has the same purpose, but in Java?
looks like you are starting with java. To help you understand the concept i wrote the same code with comments for your understanding.
package yourXYZpackage;
public class yourABCclass{
//Declare in class body so your methods(functions) can access
//and the changes made will be global in C++ context.
static int count=0;
void counter()
{
count = count++;
System.out.println(count);
//thats how you can display on console
}
//this is the main method like C++
public static void main(String[] args){
for(int i=0;i<5;i++)
{
counter();
}
}
}
hope this will help..//
u need to create a constructor first.
public class answer2 {
static int count =0;
answer2() {
System.out.println(count);
count++;
}
public static void main(String[]args) {
for(int i=0;i<5;i++) {
new answer2();
}
}
}
just define static variables as a class member normally. java developers promote object oriented programming so even your main function is a method defined in another class whose name is same as your program name.
now for your question if you want to define a static variable:
public class abc
{
public static int count = 0;
}
public class xyz
{
public void increment()
{
abc.count++;
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println(abc.count);
increment();
System.out.println(abc.count);
}
}
Hope it helps.
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args){
Demo instance = new Demo();
instance.init();
}
public void init() {
int size = 0;
inc(size);
System.out.println(size);
}
public int inc(int size){
size++;
return size;
}
}
When I call the code above, the number zero is returned.
Even declaring size as a class attribute instead of a local variable does not solve the problem. I understand that when a method is complete, the corresponding record (containing local variable and such) is popped off of the activation stack. But, if the size variable is declared in the init() method, and then incremented and returned in a separate method (inc()), shouldn't size be equal to 1?
When incrementing you do not assign the value to anything, it increments it, but it does not store it anywhere so the value remains 0, try doing like this.
public class Demo
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Demo instance = new Demo();
instance.init();
}
public void init()
{
int size = 0;
size = inc(size);
System.out.println(size);
}
public int inc(int size)
{
size++;
return size;
}
}
or like this
public class Demo
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Demo instance = new Demo();
instance.init();
}
public void init()
{
int size = 0;
System.out.println(inc(size));
}
public int inc(int size)
{
size++;
return size;
}
}
size = inc(size);
will solve your problem, since you are not using a public scoped variable.
If you want to make this a bit elegant (at least I think this will be a bit more handy), then you need to declare a variable as a class variable.
I will illustrate this to you:
public class Demo {
int size; //global range variable
public static void main(String[] args){
Demo instance = new Demo();
instance.init();
}
public void init() {
this.size = 0;
inc();
System.out.println(this.size);
}
public void inc(){
this.size++; //will increment your variable evertime you call it
}
}
public interface MyFunc<T> {
boolean func(T v1, T v2);
}
public class HighTemp {
private int hTemp;
HighTemp(){
}
public HighTemp(int ht) {
this.hTemp = ht;
}
boolean sameTemp(HighTemp ht2){
return hTemp == ht2.hTemp;
}
boolean lessThanTemp(HighTemp ht2){
return hTemp < ht2.hTemp;
}
}
class InstMethWithObjRef {
static <T> int counter(T[] vals, MyFunc<T> f, T v){
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < vals.length; i++) {
if(f.func(vals[i], v)) count++;
}
return count;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int count;
//Create an array of HighTemp objects.
HighTemp[] weekDayHighs = {new HighTemp(89), new HighTemp(82),
new HighTemp(90), new HighTemp(89),
new HighTemp(89), new HighTemp(91),
new HighTemp(84), new HighTemp(83)};
count = counter(weekDayHighs, HighTemp::lessThanTemp,new HighTemp(89));
System.out.println(count);
}
}
Please explain how
boolean sameTemp() is compatible with func() in Functional interface.
sameTemp() method got implemented on func() in Functional Interface.
count = counter(weekDayHighs, HighTemp::sameTemp, new HighTemp(89)); is working
Please Explain All points separately.
Equivalent lambda expression of HighTemp::lessThanTemp is
(highTemp1, highTemp2) -> {
return highTemp1.lessThanTemp(highTemp2);
}
This is one of the features of Java8 named Reference to an Instance Method of an Arbitrary Object of a Particular Type
Consider following example,
interface FIface<T> {
int testMethod(T a, T b);
}
class Test2 {
private String str;
Test2(String str) {
this.str = str;
}
int ok(Test2 test2) {
System.out.println("Currnet String : "+ this.str);//Refer to t1
System.out.println("Test String : "+test2.str);//Refer to t2
return 0;
}
}
public class Test {
public static <T> int checkCall(T t1, T t2, FIface<T> fiFace) {
//Here Test2 :: ok is equivalent to t1.ok(t2)
return fiFace.testMethod(t1, t2);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
checkCall(new Test2("a"), new Test2("b"), Test2 :: ok);
}
}
OUTPUT
Currnet String : a
Test String : b
Note here that Test2 :: ok is valid for the call even ok method is not static.
When you call the method checkCall for the functional interface you still have two arguments which are t1 and t2 and for that valid lambda expression can have parameters as (Test t1, Test t2) so your method Test2 :: ok here becomes valid for the call. Internally it works this way t1.ok(t2).
So, fiFace.testMethod(t1, t2); will will invoke method as t1.ok(t2)
For starters I'm not a professional programmer. I too had a great difficulty in understanding the so called "Reference to an Instance Method of an Arbitrary Object of a Particular Type" I think this might be helpful for somebody who comes here from a google search.
I understood it a little bit with the help of lambda expressions.
In your code HighTemp::lessThanTemp as a Lambda expression would look like (x,y)->{x.lessThanTemp(y);} Replacing the method reference with this lambda expression would produce the same result. The above Lambda expression or the method reference both tell the interface method what to do.
When you use the method reference it tells the interface method to use the referred method from the given class, to carryout its function. Therefore if you convert HighTemp::lessThanTemp to English words it would sound something like "implement the lessThanTemp method form the class HighTemp as the implementation of the interface function". As you might've noticed in that case the return types and the argument types should be compatible. Otherwise you cannot implement an interface.
I would provide you another simple example code. More examples helps to understand this concept.
interface myint{
int returnit(Test t ,int y);
}
class Test{
int x=0;
public Test(int x){
this.x=x;
}
public int addNumbers(int y){
return x+y;
}
public int subtractNumbers(int y){
return x-y;
}
}
public class myclass{
private static void myMethod(Test t,myint inf,int y){
int x=inf.returnit(t, y);
System.out.println(x+"");
}
public static void main(String[] args){
myMethod(new Test(4),Test::addNumbers,7);
myMethod(new Test(4),Test::subtractNumbers,7);
}
}
Output would be:
11
-3
This is the simplest way I could imagine it. See how return types and argument types gets matched using the above sentence pattern. Spend some time on it.
This is the Interface
package learninglambdaexp;
#FunctionalInterface
public interface TempInterface {
public boolean validTemp(Temperature temp);
}
This is the class
package learninglambdaexp;
public class Temperature {
private int temp;
public Temperature(int temp) {
this.temp = temp;
}
public boolean isEvenTemp() {
return temp % 2 == 0;
}
public boolean isOddTemp(){
return !isEvenTemp();
}
}
This is the Class with the Main Method
package learninglambdaexp;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class AnotherMainClass {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Temperature> tempCollection = new ArrayList<>();
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(100));
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(20));
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(30));
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(40));
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(50));
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(60));
tempCollection.add(new Temperature(70));
int k1 = countVariation(tempCollection, Temperature::isEvenTemp);
//int k2 = countVariation(Temperature::lowTemp);
System.out.println(k1);
// System.out.println(k2);
}
private static int countVariation(List<Temperature> tempCollection, TempInterface ti) {
int count = 0;
for (Temperature eachTemp : tempCollection) {
if (ti.validTemp(eachTemp)) { // (eachTemp) -> {return eachTemp.isEvenTemp();};
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
}
With one argument its easier to understand
Please, correct me if I am wrong, but the way I think about this type of method references (Reference to an Instance Method of an Arbitrary Object of a Particular Type) is that when we pass a method reference, in this case to the counter method, the instance of anonymous class which implements MyFunc interface is created. Then, inside this anonymous class, we override func method which is passed two parameters. And then inside the func method, lessThanTemp method is called like this:
v1.lessThanTemp(v2);
So for me this concept looks something like this:
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
AnonymousClass an = new AnonymousClass();
System.out.println(an.apply(new SomeClass(3), 4));
}
}
interface SomeInterface {
int apply(SomeClass obj, int n);
}
class SomeClass {
private int n;
SomeClass(int n) {
this.n = n;
}
int add(int n) {
return this.n + n;
}
}
class AnonymousClass implements SomeInterface {
#Override
public int apply(SomeClass o, int n) {
return o.add(n);
}
}
I have a static variable and updating it's value in class. But when i access this variable from another class , it shows unupdated value.
CLASS A
public static int postID = 1;
public static String Creator()
{
String message = "POST id="+postID;
return message;
}
void updatePostID()
{
postID++; //this function is being called each 10 seconds
}
#Override
public void start() {
handler.post(show);
}
Handler handler = new Handler();
private final Runnable show = new Runnable(){
public void run(){
...
updatePostID();
handler.postDelayed(this, 10000);
}
};
CLASS B
String message = A.Creator(); //this always prints postID as 1 all time
I need a global variable that i can access from each class and update its value. Waiting for your help (I am using this with a Android Service)
this is a tested code .
public class A {
public static int id = 0;
public static int increment(){
return A.id++;
}
}
public class B {
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
System.out.println(A.increment());
}
}
}
class A
{
static int id=0;
//I am updating id in my function ,
{
id++;
}
}
public class StartingPoint {
public static void main(String... args){
A a = new A();
A b = new A();
System.out.println(A.id);
System.out.println(a.id);
}
}
You need to call work to execute id++;
class B {
public static void main(String... args){
A a = new A();
a.work(); // You need to call it to apply add operation
System.out.println(A.id); // Prints 1
}
}
And this is a sample class A:
class A {
static int id = 0;
public void work(){
id++;
}
}
Save class A in a file named A.java and class B in a file named B.java.
Then compile B. Since B creates an instance of class A, A will be compiled and you don't need to compile A separately-
javac B.java
After compilation, to execute/run-
java B
Sajal Dutta's answer explains it perfectly, but if you want to keep it ALL static (i.e. not create any objects of class A, you could modify the code slightly to this:
class A {
static int id = 0;
public static void work(){
id++;
}
}
Then:
class B {
public static void main(String[] args){
System.out.println(A.id);
A.work();
System.out.println(A.id);
}
}
This would produce:
0
1
Edit (with regard to your updated question)
Where are you specifying the update of the static int? From the code you've provided all you will do is print out the same int over and over as the method containing the increment process is never called.
Edit 2:
Try this:
Change:
handler.post(show);
to:
handler.postDelayed(show, 10000);
I have a public integer variable (MainReg) in my Counter Class. I want to get value of this variable and set it in my JComponent class. Here is piece of my JComponent class:
public class Komponent2 extends JComponent implements ActionListener
{
Counter counter3;
.
.
.
int a = counter3.valueOf(MainReg);
But it doesn't work. I tried also:
int a = valueOf(counter3.MainReg);
int a = counter3.valueOf(counter3.MainReg);
int a = counter3.MainReg;
But it still doesn't work. How can I get this variable? Thanks for helping me.
EDIT
Here is my Counter class:
import java.util.Observable ;
public class Counter extends Observable
{
public int MainReg;
public int CompareReg;
public Mode countMode;
public boolean OVF;
private int a=0;
public Counter()
{
OVF=false;
}
public void setCompareReg(int dana)
{
CompareReg=dana;
}
public void setMainReg(int dana2)
{
MainReg=dana2;
}
public void setMode(Mode countMode)
{
this.countMode=countMode;
}
public void Count()
{
if (countMode==Mode.UP)
{
MainReg++;
OVF=false;
if (CompareReg < MainReg)
{
OVF=true;
MainReg=0;
setChanged();
notifyObservers();
}
}
else if (countMode==Mode.UPDOWN)
{
if(MainReg >= CompareReg)
{
a=MainReg;
MainReg--;
OVF=true;
}
else
{
if(MainReg >= a)
{
MainReg++;
OVF=false;
}
else
{
MainReg--;
if(MainReg==0)
{
a=0;
}
OVF=false;
}
}
}
else if (countMode==Mode.CONTINOUS)
{
MainReg++;
OVF=false;
if (65536 < MainReg)
{
MainReg=0;
OVF=true;
}
}
}
}
Well I see two ways you can do this.
Your MainReg integer is public, you could simply use int i = counter3.MainReg;
Or you could create a getMainReg() method in your Counter class. Then call it from whatever class.
EX:
public int getMainReg() {
return this.MainReg;
}
Give your Counter class getter methods, and then call them when you need to access their values. i.e.,
public int getMainReg() {
return mainReg;
}
public int getCompareReg(){
return compareReg;
}
public Mode getCountMode() {
return countMode;
}
And make your fields all private. Also your code should obey Java naming rules: variable names should begin with lower-case letters.
Also be sure that you've initialized your counter variable in the class that uses it, either by creating a new instance, or if appropriate, passing in a valid instance in a constructor or method parameter.