We Keep Coding

Dynamically injecting generic objects with guice

My current situation:
I want to inject the following class into my application:
public interface IConfigAccessor<T extends IConfig> {
...
}
ConfigAccessors are a proxy-objects, created dynamically at runtime. The creation of these object works as follows:
public class ConfigFactory implements IConfigFactory {
private final IConfigUpdater updater;
#Inject
public ConfigFactory(IConfigUpdater updater) {
this.updater = updater;
}
#Override
public <T extends IConfig> IConfigAccessor<T> register(final String configKey, final Class<T> configClass) {
ConfigCache<T> configCache = new ConfigCache<>(new SomeOtherThings(), configKey, configClass);
updater.register(configCache);
return new ConfigAccessor<>(configCache, configKey, configClass);
}
}
As you can see, to create these objects, I need to inject the ConfigUpdater and other depdencies. This means, that guice needs to be fully configured already.
To get the instance out of Guice, I use the following code:
IConfigFactory configClient = injector.getInstance(IConfigFactory.class);
IConfigAccessor<ConcreteConfig> accessor = configClient.register("key", ConcreteConfig.class)
How I want to inject them via Guice:
Currently, I can get the requried objects, but I have to manually pass them around in my application.
Instead, what I want to have is the following:
public class SomeClass {
#Inject
public SomeClass(#Config(configKey="key") IConfigAccessor<ConcreteConfig> accessor) {
// hurray!
}
}
What's the correct approach/technology to get this working?
After a lot of research, I'm feeling a bit lost on how to approach this topic. There are a lot of different things Guice offers, including simple Providers, custom Listeners which scan classes and identify custom annotations, FactoryModuleBuilders and more.
My problem is quite specific, and I'm not sure which of these things to use and how to get it working. I'm not even sure if this is even possible with Guice?
Edit: What I have so far
I have the following annotation which I want to use inside constructor paramters:
#Target({ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER })
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface InjectConfig {
String configKey();
}
Inside the module, I can bind a provider to IConfigAccessor (with the above annotation) as such:
bind(IConfigAccessor.class).annotatedWith(InjectConfig.class)
.toProvider(new ConfigProvider<>());
However, there are two problems whith this:
The provider cannot provide IConfigAccessor. To create such an instance, the provider would need an IConfigUpdater, but since I use 'new' for the provider, I can't inject it.
Inside the provider, there is no way to find out about the configKey used in the Annotation.
Second approach:
Let's assume that I already know all configurations and configKeys I want to inject during startup. In this case, I could loop over all possible configKeys and have the following binding:
String configKey = "some key";
final Class<? extends IConfig> configClass =...;
bind(IConfigAccessor.class).annotatedWith(Names.named(configKey))
.toProvider(new ConfigProvider<>(configKey, configClass));
However, problem (1) still resides: The provider cannot get an IConfigUpdater instance.

The main problem here is that you cannot use the value of the annotation in the injection. There is another question which covers this part:
Guice inject based on annotation value
Instead of binding a provider instance, you should bind the provider class, and get the class by injecting a typeliteral.
That way, your config factory can look like that:
public class ConfigFactory<T extends IConfig> implements IConfigFactory {
#Inject private final IConfigUpdater updater;
#Inject private TypeLiteral<T> type;
#Override
public IConfigAccessor<T> register(final String configKey) {
Class<T> configClass = (Class<T>)type.getRawType();
ConfigCache<T> configCache = new ConfigCache<>(new SomeOtherThings(), configKey, configClass);
updater.register(configCache);
return new ConfigAccessor<>(configCache, configKey, configClass);
}
}
And then SomeClass:
public class SomeClass {
#Inject
public SomeClass(ConfigFactory<ConcreteConfig> accessor) {
ConcreteConfig config = accessor.register("key");
}
}
Since SomeClass needs to know "key" anyway, this is not too much a change information-wise. The downside is that the SomeClass API now gets a factory instead of the concrete config.
[EDIT]
And here is someone who actually did inject annotated values using custom injection.

Jersey: Detect when Controller Class is Created

I've implemented a JAX-RS server application using Jersey 2.24.
I use the Guice-HK2 bridge so that the controller classes (those annotated with #Path) are injected with dependencies from Guice, not Jersey/HK2.
However, HK2 still creates instances of the #Path annotated classes itself.
Is there a way I can plug into Jersey/HK2 so that I'm notified when a #Path annotated class is created? Like some sort of lifecycle listener? Every time a #Path annotated class is created by Jersey/HK2 I want to do some registering/logging of that class.
If Guice were doing the actual creation of the #Path annotated class I think I could do it using a generic Provider but that's not available in this case, since Jersey/HK2 is creating the actual instance.
Thank you!!

I think the least intrusive way would be to just use AOP. HK2 offers AOP. What you can do is create a ConstructorInterceptor. Something like
public class LoggingConstructorInterceptor implements ConstructorInterceptor {
private static final Logger LOG
= Logger.getLogger(LoggingConstructorInterceptor.class.getName());
#Override
public Object construct(ConstructorInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
Constructor ctor = invocation.getConstructor();
LOG.log(Level.INFO, "Creating: {0}", ctor.getDeclaringClass().getName());
// returned instance from constructor invocation.
Object instance = invocation.proceed();
LOG.log(Level.INFO, "Created Instance: {0}", instance.toString());
return instance;
}
}
Then create a InterceptorService to only use the interceptor for classes annotated with #Path
public class PathInterceptionService implements InterceptionService {
private static final ConstructorInterceptor CTOR_INTERCEPTOR
= new LoggingConstructorInterceptor();
private final static List<ConstructorInterceptor> CTOR_LIST
= Collections.singletonList(CTOR_INTERCEPTOR);
#Override
public Filter getDescriptorFilter() {
return BuilderHelper.allFilter();
}
#Override
public List<MethodInterceptor> getMethodInterceptors(Method method) {
return null;
}
#Override
public List<ConstructorInterceptor> getConstructorInterceptors(Constructor<?> ctor) {
if (ctor.getDeclaringClass().isAnnotationPresent(Path.class)) {
return CTOR_LIST;
}
return null;
}
}
Then just register the InterceptionService and ConstructorInterceptor with the DI system
new ResourceConfig()
.register(new AbstractBinder(){
#Override
public void configure() {
bind(PathInterceptionService.class)
.to(InterceptionService.class)
.in(Singleton.class);
bind(LoggingConstructorInterceptor.class)
.to(ConstructorInterceptor.class)
.in(Singleton.class);
}
});
See complete example in this Gist
See Also:
HK2 documentation on AOP

Java Spring #Valid on a method call [duplicate]

Hej,
I want to use the #Validated(group=Foo.class) annotation to validate an argument before executing a method like following:
public void doFoo(Foo #Validated(groups=Foo.class) foo){}
When i put this method in the Controller of my Spring application, the #Validated is executed and throws an error when the Foo object is not valid. However if I put the same thing in a method in the Service layer of my application, the validation is not executed and the method just runs even when the Foo object isn't valid.
Can't you use the #Validated annotation in the service layer ? Or do I have to do configure something extra to make it work ?
Update:
I have added the following two beans to my service.xml:
<bean id="validator" class="org.springframework.validation.beanvalidation.LocalValidatorFactoryBean"/>
<bean class="org.springframework.validation.beanvalidation.MethodValidationPostProcessor"/>
and replaced the #Validate with #Null like so:
public void doFoo(Foo #Null(groups=Foo.class) foo){}
I know it is a pretty silly annotation to do but I wanted to check that if I call the method now and passing null it would throw an violation exception which it does. So why does it execute the #Null annotation and not the #Validate annotation ? I know one is from javax.validation and the other is from Spring but I do not think that has anything to do with it ?

In the eyes of a Spring MVC stack, there is no such thing as a service layer. The reason it works for #Controller class handler methods is that Spring uses a special HandlerMethodArgumentResolver called ModelAttributeMethodProcessor which performs validation before resolving the argument to use in your handler method.
The service layer, as we call it, is just a plain bean with no additional behavior added to it from the MVC (DispatcherServlet) stack. As such you cannot expect any validation from Spring. You need to roll your own, probably with AOP.
With MethodValidationPostProcessor, take a look at the javadoc
Applicable methods have JSR-303 constraint annotations on their
parameters and/or on their return value (in the latter case specified
at the method level, typically as inline annotation).
Validation groups can be specified through Spring's Validated
annotation at the type level of the containing target class, applying
to all public service methods of that class. By default, JSR-303 will
validate against its default group only.
The #Validated annotation is only used to specify a validation group, it doesn't itself force any validation. You need to use one of the javax.validation annotations like #Null or #Valid. Remember that you can use as many annotations as you would like on a method parameter.

As a side note on Spring Validation for methods:
Since Spring uses interceptors in its approach, the validation itself is only performed when you're talking to a Bean's method:
When talking to an instance of this bean through the Spring or JSR-303 Validator interfaces, you'll be talking to the default Validator of the underlying ValidatorFactory. This is very convenient in that you don't have to perform yet another call on the factory, assuming that you will almost always use the default Validator anyway.
This is important because if you're trying to implement a validation in such a way for method calls within the class, it won't work. E.g.:
#Autowired
WannaValidate service;
//...
service.callMeOutside(new Form);
#Service
public class WannaValidate {
/* Spring Validation will work fine when executed from outside, as above */
#Validated
public void callMeOutside(#Valid Form form) {
AnotherForm anotherForm = new AnotherForm(form);
callMeInside(anotherForm);
}
/* Spring Validation won't work for AnotherForm if executed from inner method */
#Validated
public void callMeInside(#Valid AnotherForm form) {
// stuff
}
}
Hope someone finds this helpful. Tested with Spring 4.3, so things might be different for other versions.

#pgiecek You don't need to create a new Annotation. You can use:
#Validated
public class MyClass {
#Validated({Group1.class})
public myMethod1(#Valid Foo foo) { ... }
#Validated({Group2.class})
public myMethod2(#Valid Foo foo) { ... }
...
}

Be careful with rubensa's approach.
This only works when you declare #Valid as the only annotation. When you combine it with other annotations like #NotNull everything except the #Valid will be ignored.
The following will not work and the #NotNull will be ignored:
#Validated
public class MyClass {
#Validated(Group1.class)
public void myMethod1(#NotNull #Valid Foo foo) { ... }
#Validated(Group2.class)
public void myMethod2(#NotNull #Valid Foo foo) { ... }
}
In combination with other annotations you need to declare the javax.validation.groups.Default Group as well, like this:
#Validated
public class MyClass {
#Validated({ Default.class, Group1.class })
public void myMethod1(#NotNull #Valid Foo foo) { ... }
#Validated({ Default.class, Group2.class })
public void myMethod2(#NotNull #Valid Foo foo) { ... }
}

As stated above to specify validation groups is possible only through #Validated annotation at class level. However, it is not very convenient since sometimes you have a class containing several methods with the same entity as a parameter but each of which requiring different subset of properties to validate. It was also my case and below you can find several steps to take to solve it.
1) Implement custom annotation that enables to specify validation groups at method level in addition to groups specified through #Validated at class level.
#Target({ElementType.METHOD})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
public #interface ValidatedGroups {
Class<?>[] value() default {};
}
2) Extend MethodValidationInterceptor and override determineValidationGroups method as follows.
#Override
protected Class<?>[] determineValidationGroups(MethodInvocation invocation) {
final Class<?>[] classLevelGroups = super.determineValidationGroups(invocation);
final ValidatedGroups validatedGroups = AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(
invocation.getMethod(), ValidatedGroups.class);
final Class<?>[] methodLevelGroups = validatedGroups != null ? validatedGroups.value() : new Class<?>[0];
if (methodLevelGroups.length == 0) {
return classLevelGroups;
}
final int newLength = classLevelGroups.length + methodLevelGroups.length;
final Class<?>[] mergedGroups = Arrays.copyOf(classLevelGroups, newLength);
System.arraycopy(methodLevelGroups, 0, mergedGroups, classLevelGroups.length, methodLevelGroups.length);
return mergedGroups;
}
3) Implement your own MethodValidationPostProcessor (just copy the Spring one) and in the method afterPropertiesSet use validation interceptor implemented in step 2.
#Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
Pointcut pointcut = new AnnotationMatchingPointcut(Validated.class, true);
Advice advice = (this.validator != null ? new ValidatedGroupsAwareMethodValidationInterceptor(this.validator) :
new ValidatedGroupsAwareMethodValidationInterceptor());
this.advisor = new DefaultPointcutAdvisor(pointcut, advice);
}
4) Register your validation post processor instead of Spring one.
<bean class="my.package.ValidatedGroupsAwareMethodValidationPostProcessor"/>
That's it. Now you can use it as follows.
#Validated(groups = Group1.class)
public class MyClass {
#ValidatedGroups(Group2.class)
public myMethod1(Foo foo) { ... }
public myMethod2(Foo foo) { ... }
...
}

Configure Implementation Class of Abstract Factory with Spring

For my application, I have a Scale interface and multiple classes implementing this interface, for example NormalizedScale, LogScale, etc. In one of my Services, I need to create many Scales, and I want to use Spring to define which implementation of the Scale it should create. How would I implement something like this?
--
I was thinking to create a factory ScaleFactory, like in the Abstract Factory Pattern, which I could call ScaleFactory.getScale() to get a Scale of whichever implementation I configured in the Spring XML:
class ScaleFactory {
Class<? extends Scale> scaleImplClass;
public static Scale getScale() {
return scaleImplClass.newInstance();
}
}
Scale myScale = ScaleFactory.getScale();
But with that approach, how could I configure which implementation the ScaleFactory should use from Spring XML?
--
An alternative would be to make the ScaleFactory a #Service, and then autowire the ScaleFactory into my service:
#Autowired
ScaleFactory scaleFactory;
...
Scale myScale = scaleFactory.getScale();
Then I can use an autowired property in the ScaleFactory to define the scaleImplClass. But that seems weird because my Factory is also a Service and I have an instance of that factory.
--
Another approach would be to have the Class scaleImplementationClass property in my service instead of the ScaleFacotry and use the ScaleFactory like so:
#Value("${scaleImplementationClass}")
Class scaleImplementationClass
...
Scale myScale = ScaleFactory.getScale(scaleImplementationClass);
But then the factory is quite pointless because I could also just as well run scaleImplementationClass.newInstance().

There are a couple of different Spring-like ways you can handle this. The approach I have personally gone for looks a bit like this:
public interface ScaleFactory {
public Scale newInstance();
public String type();
}
public class FirstScaleFactory implements ScaleFactory {
public Scale newInstance() {
return new FirstScale();
}
public String type() {
return "first";
}
}
public class SecondScaleFactory implements ScaleFactory {
public Scale newInstance() {
return new SecondScale();
}
public String type() {
return "second";
}
}
public class ScaleManager {
private final Map<String, ScaleFactory> factories;
#Autowired
public ScaleManager(List<ScaleFactory> factories) {
this.factories = factories.stream()
.collect(Collectors.toMap(f -> f.type(), Function::identity));
}
public Scale newInstance(String type) {
return Optional.ofNullable(factories.get(type))
.map(factory -> factory.newInstance())
.orElseThrow(IllegalArgumentException::new);
}
}
With this approach, your ScaleManager is a standard Spring bean that can be wired into any class that needs a scale instance. At initialization time, it gets all ScaleFactories that are defined in the Spring context, and autowires them in as a List<ScaleFactory>, which is then converted to a Map (where the ScaleFactory type is the key). This avoids you needing to worry about class names of Scale, and gives your the ability to change them later (as long as you keep the type key consistent)`
Your ScaleFactory implementations can then do whatever they need to do. For example, if you have one type of Scale that you know is immutable, you can have the factory return the same instance every time. Alternatively you can have every invocation return a separate instance - the instantiation of the Scale is up to the implementation-dependent factory.

You can simply use "Qualifiers" which is basically going to point to a specific "named" bean. By default the bean names are the name of your classes, with the first letter in lower case (MyClass -> myClass). If you want to define your own names you can do as follow :
#Service("customizedBeanName")
You would end up doing something like this :
#Autowired
#Qualifier("logScale")
private Scale logScale;
#Autowired
#Qualifier("anotherScale")
private Scale anotherScale;

As for spring 5.x there's a simpler and cleaner way of doing this. I have decided to use #ConditionalOnProperty annotation but you may choose any #Conditional* of your preference.
Here's the thing, I've have simplified to extreme:
public interface MyService {}
#Service
#ConditionalOnProperty(prefix = "myService", name = "Impl", havingValue = "Some")
public class SomeService implements MyService {}
#Service
#ConditionalOnProperty(prefix = "myService", name = "Impl", havingValue = "Foo")
public class FooService implements MyService {}
#Service
public class SimpleService {
#Autowired
SimpleService(MyService service) {
// service instance will depend on configuration
}
}
I'm using springboot so I've decided to use application.properties in order to set values via environment variables like this:
myService.Impl=${MY_SERVICE_IMPL}
Then, I have a fully dynamic injection based on environment variables that may be passed to a docker container for instance.

JAX-RS: map method entity based on method annotation

I am using JAX-RS 2.0 with Jersey 2.6. I was wondering if it was possible to have something like this:
#GET
#Path("/get/{id}")
#MapTo(type = MyObjectDTO.class)
public MyObject getMyObject(#PathParam("id") String id){
MyObject o = ...
return o;
}
In the method above I am returning an instance of MyObject. However, I have defined the MapTo annotation to indicate that I want to map this object to MyObjectDTO. The way I was thinking this could work is to process the response early in a ContainerResponseFilter, detect the annotation MapTo and, assuming no error occurred, replace the entity in the response with an instance of MyObjectDTO created appropriately from the existing entity (of type MyObject).
However, I couldn't find a way to get the Method in the resource that was just called after the request came in, i.e., the getMyObject method, so that I can scan for the MapTo annotation.
Is there a way to achieve this in a JAX-RS-y kind of way?

Is this some serious reason you cannot return dto object? Sounds very strange...You can probably use AOP but I guess it would be bad practive
Here the Spring AOP example
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/2.5.4/reference/aop.html

I think I found a solution by reading this SO. I created a class that looks like this:
#Provider // or register in the configuration...
public class DTOMapperFeature implements DynamicFeature {
#Override
public void configure(ResourceInfo resourceInfo, FeatureContext context) {
for (Annotation annotation : resourceInfo.getResourceMethod().getAnnotations()) {
if (annotation instanceof MapTo) {
MapTo mapTo = (MapTo) annotation;
// Note: additional validation (return type shouldn't be void,
// collections are out etc.) is required before creating this,
// or should be pushed in the DTOMapperFilter.
// You get the gist: this filter will map the entity to an instance
// of the specified class (using a constructor in this case).
context.register(new DTOMapperFilter(
resourceInfo.getResourceMethod().getReturnType(),
mapTo.getResponseType());
}
}
}
#Priority(/* appropriate priority here! */)
public final static class DTOMapperFilter implements ContainerResponseFilter {
public DTOMapperFilter(Class<?> declaredReturnType, Class<?> responseType) {
// implementation omitted: find DTO constructor etc.
// throw if responseType does NOT have a constructor that takes an instance
// of declaredReturnType: catch errors at application bootstrap!
}
#Override
public void filter(
ContainerRequestContext requestContext,
ContainerResponseContext responseContext) throws IOException {
// implementation omitted: create instance of DTO class using constructor
}
}
}
Given sensible exceptions will be thrown from either the constructor of DTOMapperFilter or the configure method above, this should be pretty robust and errors detectable at test time.