We Keep Coding

DeltaSpike custom ConfigSource with CDI

I am trying to define a custom DeltaSpike ConfigSource. The custom config source will have the highest priority and check the database for the config parameter.
I have a ConfigParameter entity, that simply has a key and a value.
#Entity
#Cacheable
public class ConfigParameter ... {
private String key;
private String value;
}
I have a #Dependent DAO that finds all config parameters.
What I am trying to do now, is define a custom ConfigSource, that is able to get the config parameter from the database. Therefore, I want to inject my DAO in the ConfigSource. So basically something like
#ApplicationScoped
public class DatabaseConfigSource implements ConfigSource {
#Inject
private ConfigParameterDao configParameterDao;
....
}
However, when registering the ConfigSource via META-INF/services/org.apache.deltaspike.core.spi.config.ConfigSource, the class will be instantiated and CDI will not work.
Is there any way to get CDI working in this case?
Thanks in advance, if you need any further information, please let me know.

The main problem is, that the ConfigSource gets instantiated very early on when the BeanManager is not available yet. Even the JNDI lookup does not work at that point in time. Thus, I need to delay the injection/lookup.
What I did now, is add a static boolean to my config source, that I set manually. We have a InitializerService that makes sure that the system is setup properly. At the end of the initialization process, I call allowInitialization() in order to tell the config source, that the bean is injectable now. Next time the ConfigSource is asked, it will be able to inject the bean using BeanProvider.injectFields.
public class DatabaseConfigSource implements ConfigSource {
private static boolean allowInit;
#Inject
private ConfigParameterProvider configParameterProvider;
#Override
public int getOrdinal() {
return 500;
}
#Override
public String getPropertyValue(String key) {
initIfNecessary();
if (configParameterProvider == null) {
return null;
}
return configParameterProvider.getProperty(key);
}
public static void allowInitialization() {
allowInit = true;
}
private void initIfNecessary() {
if (allowInit) {
BeanProvider.injectFields(this);
}
}
}
I have a request-scoped bean that holds all my config variables for type-safe access.
#RequestScoped
public class Configuration {
#Inject
#ConfigProperty(name = "myProperty")
private String myProperty;
#Inject
#ConfigProperty(name = "myProperty2")
private String myProperty2;
....
}
When injecting the Configuration class in a different bean, each ConfigProperty will be resolved. Since my custom DatabaseConfigSource has the highest ordinal (500), it will be used for property resolution first. If the property is not found, it will delegate the resolution to the next ConfigSource.
For each ConfigProperty the getPropertyValue function from the DatabaseConfigSource is called. Since I do not want to retreive the parameters from the database for each config property, I moved the config property resolution to a request-scoped bean.
#RequestScoped
public class ConfigParameterProvider {
#Inject
private ConfigParameterDao configParameterDao;
private Map<String, String> configParameters = new HashMap<>();
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
List<ConfigParameter> configParams = configParameterDao.findAll();
configParameters = configParams.stream()
.collect(toMap(ConfigParameter::getId, ConfigParameter::getValue));
}
public String getProperty(String key) {
return configParameters.get(key);
}
}
I could sure change the request-scoped ConfigParameterProvider to ApplicationScoped. However, we have a multi-tenant setup and the parameters need to be resolved per request.
As you can see, this is a bit hacky, because we need to explicitly tell the ConfigSource, when it is allowed to be instantiated properly (inject the bean).
I would prefer a standarized solution from DeltaSpike for using CDI in a ConfigSource. If you have any idea on how to properly realise this, please let me know.

Even though this post has been answered already I'd like to suggest another possible solution for this problem.
I managed to load properties from my db service by creating an #Signleton #Startup EJB which extends the org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.config.BaseConfigSource and injects my DAO as delegate which I then registered into the org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.config.ConfigResolver.
#Startup
#Singleton
public class DatabaseConfigSourceBean extends BaseConfigSource {
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DatabaseConfigSourceBean.class);
private #Inject PropertyService delegateService;
#PostConstruct
public void onStartup() {
ConfigResolver.addConfigSources(Collections.singletonList(this));
logger.info("Registered the DatabaseConfigSourceBean in the ConfigSourceProvider ...");
}
#Override
public Map<String, String> getProperties() {
return delegateService.getProperties();
}
#Override
public String getPropertyValue(String key) {
return delegateService.getPropertyValue(key);
}
#Override
public String getConfigName() {
return DatabaseConfigSourceBean.class.getSimpleName();
}
#Override
public boolean isScannable() {
return true;
}
}
I know that creating an EJB for this purpose basically produces a way too big overhead, but I think it's a bit of a cleaner solution instead of handling this problem by some marker booleans with static accessors ...

DS is using the java se spi mechanism for this which is not CD'Injectable'. One solution would be to use the BeanProvider to get hold of your DatabaseConfigSource and delegate operations to it.

Writing into ServletContext in Jersey using annotation.

I have a class like this:
public class MyResource(){
public MyResource(#Context ServletContext context){
context.setAttribute("someAttribute","someVal");
}
#PUT
public void someMethod(){
...
}
}
and I would like to this using annotations (i.e. JAX-RS/Jersey reads the value of the annotation and writes it into ServletContext so that I can access this value somewhere else where I inject the ServletContext in the request scope.)
#MyCustomAnnotation(name="someVal")
public class MyResource(){
}

Annotation needs to be treated by some code.
You need to create a filter, that processes your custom annotation, before your method is called.
see : https://jersey.java.net/documentation/latest/filters-and-interceptors.html
Creating a filter, should be fairly easy, but it is not enough. It will get called, but won't know in what context it will be called. By context, I mean which class / method will be called right after the filter is executed. In this example I assumed your annotation (called MyCustomAnnotation) can be applied to class / method.
For this, you need to create a "Dynamic Feature" that will bind a different instance of the filter, for each possible context.
In details :
For a given JAX-RS class :
#MyCustomAnnotation(name="someVal")
class MyClass{
#GET
#MyCustomAnnotation(name="someConfig")
public Object myMethod(){
...
}
#GET
#MyCustomAnnotation(name="otherConfig")
public Object myOtherMethod(){
...
}
}
First, create your annotation (I guess you know, but just to be clear) :
#Target({ ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE })
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface MyCustomAnnotation {
String name() default "";
}
Then, create a filter.
Notice the special constructor. A different instance of the filter will be created for each possible context. The right instance of the filter will be used in a specific context. This way it will know in what context (Class / Method) is is called. This way, using intro-spectation, your filter can behave however you like, based of the annotation you used on your target class and/or method :
#Priority(Priorities.AUTHORIZATION - 1)
public class MyFilter implements ContainerRequestFilter {
private final Class<?> _class;
private final Method method;
private MyCustomAnnotation classAnnotation;
private MyCustomAnnotation methodAnnotation;
public MyFilter(Class<?> _class, Method method) {
this._class = _class;
this.method = method;
this.classAnnotation = _class.getAnnotation(MyCustomAnnotation.class);
this.methodAnnotation = method.getAnnotation(MyCustomAnnotation.class);
}
#Override
public void filter(ContainerRequestContext requestContext) {
// your code goes here!
// based on classAnnotation and/or methodAnnotation,
// add whatever you want to the requestContext
}
}
Ok, so now we have an annotation, a filter that process this annotation, now we need to bind dynamically to class / methods that are annotated
public class MyFilterDynamicFeature implements DynamicFeature {
#Override
public void configure(final ResourceInfo resourceInfo, final FeatureContext configuration) {
//if the class or the method is annotated, bind a new instance of our filter to this method
if(resourceInfo.getResourceClass().getAnnotation(MyCustomAnnotation.class)!=null || resourceInfo.getResourceMethod().getAnnotation(MyCustomAnnotation.class)!=null){
configuration.register(new MyFilter(resourceInfo.getResourceClass(), resourceInfo.getResourceMethod()));
}
}
}
In your JAX-RS configuration... register your new DynamicFeature
public class MyRestConfig extends ResourceConfig {
public RestConfig() {
// your configs...
packages("com.yourpackage.rest");
// ...
// handle #MyCustomAnnotation annotations
register(MyFilterDynamicFeature.class);
// ...
}
}
I hope this is clear. Recap of what you need to do
create your annotation
annotate your JAX-RS class / method with your annotation
create a filter that will process your annotation
create a dynamic feature, that will bind a different instance of the filter for each different context (method / class combination, where at least one or the other is annotated with your annotation)
register the dynamic feature in your rest config
----Update--------
Rather than using the Dynamic Feature, you should be able to inject the ressource info at runtime
#Context
private ResourceInfo resourceInfo;

Why Guice prevents from binding to Provider?

Recently, when I played around with Google Guice I was trying to do something like this:
#Override
protected void configure() {
...
bind(Provider.class).to(ViewFactory.class);
...
}
Where ViewFactory was:
public class ViewFactory implements Provider<SomeType> {...}
Of course, Guice didn't let me do that returing error:
1) Binding to Provider is not allowed.
{stacktrace}
What is the reason why it is not possible to bind to provider?

I guess it is because Provider interface is very special to Guice. In fact, all its internal machinery is implemented in term of providers.
Moreover, this could create ambiguities. If bindings to providers were possible:
bind(SomeClass.class).to(SomeClassImpl1.class);
bind(new TypeLiteral<Provider<SomeClass>>() {}).to(() -> new SomeClassImpl2());
then what should Guice inject here?
#Inject
OtherClass(Provider<SomeClass> someClassProvider) { ... }
Should it be a provider which returns SomeClassImpl1 (because of the first binding; remember, direct injections and provider injections are interchangeable in Guice) or should it be a provider which returns SomeClassImpl2 (because of the second binding)?
It really is redundant. Because you can inject SomeClass or Provider<SomeClass> regardless of the actual binding, you can bind the class itself to its provider:
bind(SomeClass.class).toProvider(() -> new SomeClassImpl());
// Either of the following will work
#Inject
OtherClass1(Provider<SomeClass> someClassProvider) { ... }
#Inject
OtherClass2(SomeClass someClass) { ... }

Provider is a special case. Guice does a lot of things behind the scenes with Provider, so they just ban binding to the Provider class entirely. One example is with scoping: your custom Provider might call new every single time, but if you create the provider in the Singleton scope, that should not happen. So Guice doesn't actually inject your provider, it injects a wrapped version. Things like that is why they ban binding to Provider.class directly. Here's a code example:
import com.google.inject.*;
import com.google.inject.name.*;
public class ProviderBindExample {
public static class ProvModule extends AbstractModule {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(Foo.class).toProvider(FooProvider.class);
bind(Foo.class).annotatedWith(Names.named("singleton"))
.toProvider(FooProvider.class)
.in(Singleton.class);
}
}
public static interface Foo { }
public static class FooProvider implements Provider<Foo> {
#Override
public Foo get() {
return new Foo() {};
}
}
public static class SomeClass {
#Inject public Provider<Foo> provider;
#Inject #Named("singleton") public Provider<Foo> singletonProvider;
}
public static void main(String... args) {
Injector inj = Guice.createInjector(new ProvModule());
SomeClass s = inj.getInstance(SomeClass.class);
System.out.println("Provider class = " + s.provider.getClass());
System.out.println("Singleton provider class = " + s.singletonProvider.getClass());
Foo first = s.provider.get();
Foo second = s.provider.get();
System.out.printf("regular scope: objects are %s%n", first == second ? "the same" : "different");
first = s.singletonProvider.get();
second = s.singletonProvider.get();
System.out.printf("singleton scope: objects are %s%n", first == second ? "the same" : "different");
}
}
Output:
Provider class = class com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4
Singleton provider class = class com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4
regular scope: objects are different
singleton scope: objects are the same

How to inject callback classes in Spring context?

Is it possible to use callbacks with Spring to that they are managed by application context?
My problem is when a service is used from outer by #Autowired, but within that service there is a callback defined using new operator.
The following example executes a method that is worth retrying. Spring offers a RetryCallback for this case (I know this could be acchieved differently, but just to illustrate my callback problem).
#Service
class MyService {
//main method invoked
void run(DataVO dataVO) {
//new operator not usable in spring context
RetryCallback<Object> retryCallback = new RetryCallback<Object>() {
#Override
public Object doWithRetry(RetryContext context) throws Exception {
return createBooking(dataVO);
}
};
}
private Object createBooking(DataVO dataVO) {
//creates the booking, worth retry on specific failures
//uses further injected/autowired services here
}
}
Is it possible to refactor this snippet so that the callback is managed by spring/injected/autowired?

Make your service implement the callback interface :
#Service
class MyService implements RetryCallback<Object> {
//main method invoked
void run(DataVO dataVO) {
}
#Override
public Object doWithRetry(RetryContext context) throws Exception {
return createBooking(dataVO);
}
private Object createBooking(DataVO dataVO) {
//creates the booking, worth retry on specific failures
//uses further injected/autowired services here
}
}

Inject based on the package of the class

I have 2 modules containing classes:
blog.model.ArticleDAO
blog.model.CategoryDAO
users.model.UserDAO
users.model.UserGroupDAO
All these DAOs have a dependency on the same service, but I need to inject a different instance based on the package.
I mean the module blog should have a specific instance of MyService, and the module users should have another instance of MyService.
I don't want to create 2 named services because some day I may want to use the same service for all DAOs. Or I could also want to inject another specific instance for a specific class...
Is there a way to inject a service based on the package of a class?
A way to say:
inject foo (instance of MyService) into classes that are in blog.*
inject bar (instance of MyService) into classes that are in users.*
but keeping all my classes unaware of that! Their configuration should only state "Inject an instance of MyService".

First I want to say, I find this a strange requirement. I am also wondering why your DAOs need a Service. In a normal layered design, this is the opposite (the Service uses the DAO).
However I find the challenge interesting, I tried to use a FactoryBean to create a Java Proxy class which would redirect at runtime to the correct instance of MyService depending of the caller package. Here is the code:
public class CallerPackageAwareProxyFactoryBean implements
FactoryBean<MyService>, ApplicationContextAware {
private Class<?> targetServiceType;
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
private InvocationHandler invocationHandler = new InvocationHandler() {
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args)
throws Throwable {
if (ReflectionUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
// Only consider equal when proxies are identical.
return (proxy == args[0]);
} else if (ReflectionUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
// Use hashCode of service locator proxy.
return System.identityHashCode(proxy);
} else if (ReflectionUtils.isToStringMethod(method)) {
return "Service dispatcher: " + targetServiceType.getName();
} else {
String callerPackageFirstLevel = getCallerPackageFirstLevel();
Map<String, ?> beans = applicationContext
.getBeansOfType(targetServiceType);
for (Map.Entry<String, ?> beanEntry : beans.entrySet()) {
if (beanEntry.getKey().startsWith(callerPackageFirstLevel)) {
return method.invoke(beanEntry.getValue(), args);
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
String.format(
"Could not find any valid bean to forward call for method %s.",
method.getName()));
}
}
private String getCallerPackageFirstLevel() {
Throwable t = new Throwable();
StackTraceElement[] elements = t.getStackTrace();
String callerClassName = elements[3].getClassName();
return callerClassName.split("\\.")[0];
}
};
public MyService getObject() throws Exception {
return (MyService) Proxy.newProxyInstance(Thread.currentThread()
.getContextClassLoader(), new Class<?>[] { MyService.class },
invocationHandler);
}
public Class<?> getObjectType() {
return MyService.class;
}
public boolean isSingleton() {
return true;
}
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) {
this.applicationContext = applicationContext;
}
public void setTargetServiceType(Class<?> targetServiceType) {
this.targetServiceType = targetServiceType;
}
}
I didn't had to change anything to the Dao or Service configuration. I just had to add the creation of the FactoryBean in the Spring context:
<bean id="myService" class="stackoverflow.CallerPackageAwareProxyFactoryBean">
<property name="targetServiceType" value="a.b.c.MyService" />
</bean>
Maybe a few comments:
The caller package can only be get by creating an exception and looking at the stacktrace.
The code of the InvocationHandler is inspired from ServiceLocatorFactoryBean.
I am still wondering if there is an easier way but I think there is not.
You could replace part of the InvocationHandler to use a configuration Map (package => MyService bean name)
I would not recommend using such code in a productive environment.