I am very new to webservices, I call a webservice through a wrapper provided by some party. I need to wait for certain amount of time after calling the webservice, if response is not received, i should shoot up time out response.
Remember i do not call the webservice directly. Below is the psuedo code.
String responseXML = pro.sendToCustomer("https://india.com/ClientGatewayV2/GatewayClientInterfaceV2", asaXML);
pro.senToCustomer is present in the jar provided by third party. How do i handle session time out on this?
Related
I have REST calls between two microservices, one of the call is taking more than 15 mins of time to complete. We have company's own private cloud implementation which is terminating any open connection kept for more than 15 mins.
We are looking for some asynchronous rest call implementation, where service A will trigger the rest call to service B and forget and service B will notify when the response is ready to be served.
Is there any widely used technique/API for such scenario? I was not able to find any thing concrete on this front.
You could use Polling. Something like this :
Service A triggers a Rest call to Service B which returns an OK response. Then in each 1 minute service A make another API request to another endpoint in Service B which would return status of the previous request until the process is completed or for may be a certain point of time. Now when the 2nd request send the status as success you can mark the process as completed.
Instead of creating the actual resources, create a temporary one. Instead of returning a 201 (Created) HTTP response, you can issue a 202 (Accepted) response code. This informs the client that the request has been accepted and understood by the server, but the resource is not (yet) created. Send the temporary resource inside the Location header.
Request:
POST /blogs HTTP/1.1
<xml>
blogdata
</xml>
Response:
HTTP/1.1 202 Accepted
Location: /queue/12345
This location can store information about the status of the actual resource: an ETA on when it will be created, what is currently being done or processed.
When the actual resource has been created, the temporary resources can return a 303 (See other) response. The location header returns the URI to the definitive resource. A client can either DELETE the temporary resource, or the server can expire this resource and return a 410 (Gone) later on.
Source: https://restcookbook.com/Resources/asynchroneous-operations/
I would like to create a web application that is able to "ping" the client once the client has accessed certain URL (e.g. www.example.com/ping/hello) in order to get the round trip time between server and client. And by "ping" request i mean a simple request with a timestamp from server and client sends back response with its timestamp. I was hoping for this activity to be done with a single URL if possible.
The flow is something like this:
Client goes to the URL
Server sends the response to the client with its timestamp
Client then sends another response to server with new timestamp
Server finally concludes the connection with 200 OK
So far I've only been able to do the first and second steps but not sure how to ensure client to go to the same URL again without back to the first step.
My server code is something like this:
#GET
#Path("/helloping")
public Response getPingServerClient(#Context HttpServletRequest req) {
String result = Long.toString(System.currentTimeMillis());
return Response.status(200).entity(result).build();
//the code to receive the response from client containing timestamp
}
Is there a way to do that?
There are two client to server calls. You'll have to figure out a way to differentiate between these two calls.
I can think of 3 options for this purpose:
HTTP header
Query parameter in GET request
POST request with a marker to differentiate the two calls
The request/response flow will be something like this:
Client -> Server : Request
Server -> Client : Response with timestamp t1
Client -> Server : Request with timestamp t2 and the above mentioned marker
Server -> Client : Response 200
In this approach, you'll have to write custom code at both server and client side to handle the mentioned logic.
I'm not a fan of what you are proposing because you're basically forcing the client to setup up code to effectively become a server, itself. This is inconvenient for the client.
Instead, consider a ping-pong approach where the client first calls the server's ping endpoint, which returns the server's timestamp. As soon as the client obtains the server's ping response, the client is instructed to call a second pong method, which accepts the new timestamp.
It's easier and simpler to require the client to call web service methods than it is to force to client to become a pseudo server. Hence the recommendation.
Is there a way to get how such time it took to get a response from a webservice call. Its for logging purpose where I am just trying to see how much time its taking to make a request and response and put that time in java code.
I need to write a HTTP client which to communicate with Floodlight OpenFlow controller via its REST API.
For testing I did it in python, and it worked OK. But now I'm in a situation where it has to be done in Java, of which I'm admittedly still at the beginner's level. One of my apps uses AsyncHttpClient to dispatch async GET requests, and works just fine. Now as a Floodlight's REST client, it has to do POST and DELETE with JSON encoded body. My code for an async POST request works very much as expected.
But no luck with DELETE.
Somehow it doesn't write JSON string into its request body.
The code is almost identical with POST. For debugging, I don't feed an AsyncCompletionHandler instance to execute() method.
System.out.println(ofEntry.toJson()); // this returns {"name": "xyz"} as expected.
Future<Response> f = httpClient.prepareRequest(new RequestBuilder("DELETE")
.setUrl("http://" + myControllerBaseUrl + urlPathFlowPostDelete)
.setHeader("content-type", "application/json")
.setBody(ofEntry.toJson())
.build()).execute();
System.out.println(f.getStatusCode()); // returns 200.
System.out.println(f.getResponseBody()); // returns {"status" : "Error! No data posted."}.
Just to make sure, I peeped into packet dump with wireshark, and found out the server isn't lying :)
The author of the library has written an extensive amount of relevant, valuable information, but unfortunately I can't find example code specifically for building a DELETE request.
I'd very much appreciate any suggestions, pointers, and of course pinpoint solutions!
Not sure that replying to my own question is appropriate here, but I have just found a related thread at the floodlight-dev Google group.
Problem with Static Flow Pusher DELETE REST method
So this could be a problem with Floodlight REST API which requires message body for a DELETE request to identify what to be deleted, whereas AHC is simply compliant with RFC2616.
I will follow the thread at Google group, and see how it will conclude among developers.
First off, I'm using an older version of Restlet (1.1).
Secondly, I'm not sure I'm doing the correct thing. Here's what I'm trying to do...
I'm creating a reporting service (resource). I'd like my service to listen for POST requests. The body of the request will contain the report definition. I'd like the response to be the CSV file generated by the service (the report). Is responding to a POST request in this manner OK from a REST standpoint (if not, then how to refine this resource)?
I can't seem to figure out how the acceptRepresentation() generates the response. I've tried setting the Representation parameter passed into the method to a new FileRepresentation. I've also tried to utilize the represent() method, but it doesn't seem like that method is called as part of the POST processing.
How can I accomplish this seeming easy task?
Calling the getResponse().setEntity() method from acceptRepresentation() will accept the new FileRepresentation and accomplish what I'd like to.