I'm used to using log4j and whenever there were setup/config problems I'd enable "-Dlog4j.debug" and all the config info would be dumped out at startup.
This was very useful on a number of occasions.
Now I'm working on a Spring boot application, which I've found uses:
Commons logging Logger statements in the client code
A bridge jar (jcl-over-slf4j-xxx.jar) which translates the commons logging calls into slf4j more info here
Finally slf4j uses "logback" as the underlying logging framework
I found it rather painful to figure all this out.
Is there an equivalent of -Dlog4j.debug which can show me how this is all hanging together at startup time?
This is the best/only option I've found so far, and it's logback specific.
Use this -D on the command line:
-Dlogback.statusListenerClass=ch.qos.logback.core.status.OnConsoleStatusListener
Taken from here
This essentially is the logback equivalent of log4j's -Dlog4j.debug.
It dumps the logback startup sequence to the console at startup time, as the logging system is initialised.
This is not a true answer as I'd like some messages to show before this to show why logback is being used, but I haven't found anything like that yet.
Aside: This may also be useful for Spring Boot:
-Ddebug
Taken from here and here
If you are using logback, I assume you are using the logback.xml file? Then if you start that file with <configuration debug="true"> then it should dump the status information. More information in the documentation under status data section.
Related
We understand that Jetty 11 has basically changed logging from version 10 (no internal Jetty classes, moreover Jetty 11 is commited to use SLF4 as a base logging).
The problem
We have a rudimentary knowledge of SLF4J (used it before and we've even read the Jetty 11 SLF4J sources ,too), but currently we don't see any way to "teach" Jetty 11 a new logging (aka there are no "setLogging()" methods in the Jetty 11 source code as there were before).
Global (Jetty) parameters, alas, can't be our solution just yet.
The state (aka our requirements)
We have already solved the "RequestLog" outputs of Jetty, no problems there, we need the "normal" Jetty-log outputs.
We need to control (many) modules/jars etc. via a unified logging.
Our logging is simple but requires that no output happens on the console (stdout / stderr etc). In best case the logging gets an instance of an Exception/Runtime, too.
Therefore, we need to route the Jetty output from the "Jetty server" through our internal logging. Using SLF4? If there is no other way (and we see no other way up to now), gladly.
Switching back to Jetty 10, sadly, is not an option.
Could this be solved in any way we are not aware of (yet)? Any idea would be very appreciated, thank you!
The switch from Jetty logging to Slf4j was actually done in Jetty 10.0.0.
slf4j was designed for unified logging, it can capture into a single logging location implementation all of the logging events generated from libraries that use ...
slf4j API
java.util.logging API
log4j1 API
log4j2 API
commons-logging API
logback API
org.apache.juli.logging API
and if you use slf4j version 2.x series, there's even rudimentary support for capturing java.lang.System.Logger API.
With slf4j, you have 2 categories of jar files to think about.
Bridge API JARs
These are slf4j based JARs that merely capture the above logging events and route them to slf4j. You can choose 0..n of these JARs to use.
There's dozens of options here.
Here's some common ones
jcl-overs-slf4j - captures Jakarta Commons Logging events and sends to slf4j
jul-to-slf4j - captures Java Util Logging events and sends them to slf4j
log4j-over-slf4j - captures Log4j 1.x events and sends them to slf4j
log4j2-overs-slf4j - captures Log4j 2.x events and sends them to slf4j
osgi-over-slf4j - captures osgi logging bundle events and sends them to slf4j
See http://www.slf4j.org/legacy.html
Implementation Binding JAR
These are the implementation of slf4j-api, and is the final binding of all logging events, it is the thing that decides what to do with the logging event (eg: write it to disk, ignore it, send it to a logging database, etc)
You have many choices here as well, here's some common jars to pick from (pick only 1!)
logback-classic - slf4j to Logback (Eclipse Jetty group's favorite logging implementation)
slf4j-jdk14 - slf4j to Java Util Logging
slf4j-log4j12 - slf4j to Log4j 1.2.x
log4j-slf4j-impl - slf4j to Log4j 2.x (see https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-slf4j-impl/)
slfj-jcl - slf4j to Jakarta Commons Logging
jetty-slf4j-impl - Jetty 10+ implementation of the slf4j api
See: http://www.slf4j.org/manual.html#swapping
Since Jetty 10.0.x, the jetty-slf4j-impl exists, which provides an out of the box implementation that simply writes to System.err (aka STDERR) with some decent logging filtering by level in the usual jetty-logging.properties.
See https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-slf4j-impl
Important advice
Don't use multiple binding implementations. Narrow it down to 1 binding implementation and purge all other logging implementation jars.
Don't accidentally create a loop with introducing a Bridge API Jar and a Binding Implementation JAR with the same logging technology. (eg: using binding log4j-over-slf4j and slf4j-log4j12 at the same time)
There is no "configuration" to wire up these binding or bridge jars, their mere existence in the classloader is enough to make them work. See the slf4j manual on how that works.
We have already solved the "RequestLog" outputs of Jetty, no problems there, we need the "normal" Jetty-log outputs.
Interesting, this is "solved" by actually using slf4j, as that's the only non-deprecated implementation of RequestLog.Writer in Jetty 10 and Jetty 11.
The way this works, is the Slf4jRequestLogWriter will emit events to a single named logger (the name of which you can configure in Slf4jRequestLogWriter.setLoggerName(String)) using the slf4j-api. Then it reaches the logging implementation and is routed wherever that logging configuration decides based on that logger name (file, with rolling, syslog, sent to a different system for aggregation, logstash, etc)
Did you really implement your own RequestLog.Writer instead of just using your preferred logging logging library? (libraries like logback, log4j2, log4j1, and even java.util.logging can easily create separate log files for RequestLog events).
⚠️ Note: do not use logback-access for RequestLog at this time (It does not fully support jakarta.servlets yet, and has many bugs that result in bad request log data. See open PR at https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/pull/532)
Using JBoss EAP 6.4 (AS 7.x I guess).
By default, JBoss' logging service is capturing all application output to stdout (and presumably stderr) and wrapping it in its own log4j-based logs. When running locally I want to totally disable this (annoying) feature1, but the references I've found on the Interwebs all either don't work or are for older versions of JBoss. I've tried excluding every possible logging framework in the jboss-deployment-structure configuration, passing -Dorg.jboss.logging.per-deployment=false as a system property, but still JBoss captures stdout.
How can I disable it in this version of JBoss?
[1] If you must know the reason, it's because we have detailed logging configuration via logback and when running locally in an IDE want to be able to see and control that log output in the console without JBoss' logging service getting in the way.
It's hard-coded in the entry points to capture stdout and stderr. This is done so both streams are written to the defined log handlers. Because of this there is no real clean way around it. However there are ways to make it at least look a little better.
You can create a new console-handler and define a stdout logger to ensure only the simple message is written though.
Here are some CLI commands to configure a logger named stdout to just print the message it receives.
/subsystem=logging/pattern-formatter=plain-formatter:add(pattern="%s")
/subsystem=logging/console-handler=plain-console:add(autoflush=true, target=System.out, named-formatter=plain-formatter)
/subsystem=logging/logger=stdout:add(use-parent-handlers=false, handlers=[plain-console])
Note: It could be my test logback.xml configuration, but I had to use a pattern of %s%n for the plain-formatter.
The only other option I can think of would be to write your own logback ConsoleAppender that creates an output stream based on java.io.FileOutputStream.out rather than using System.out.
I have a web application, which uses log4j and slf4j as facade for logging. Logging is configured not from log4j.properties file, but from Java code.
Application is running on three different machines using Websphere Application Server.
Issue is that on two instances logging works as expected. But on the third one nothing is written in my logfile. Output goes to SystemErr.log instead (there are messages of ERROR and INFO levels).
Initially I thought that something is with Websphere server configuration, but later I found this link http://www.webagesolutions.com/knowledgebase/waskb/waskb004/ which says that such situation can be when log4j.properties can not be read.
But I am not using property file for this. And configuration form Java works OK on other two instances.
Any ideas what can be the issue?
Thank you in advance!
Please make sure that no alternative slf4j binding (such as simple) exists on the CLASSPATH.
I've a problem with OpenJPA logging and Websphere (8).
For a few days I try to redirect the OpenJPA logging information into a separate file (instead of the SystemOut log file). This is what I tried:
Changing the persistence.xml with logging information (e.g. ). Though I learned that websphere is ignoring this entry. Can I assume that this is correct?
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v8r0/topic/com.ibm.websphere.express.doc/info/exp/ae/tejb_loggingwjpa.html tells me the same
Also the wsjpa.log property did not help.
Specifying a handler for openjpa (or openjpa.Runtime, ...) in JSR-47 configuration file does not work either (other configurations worked). What I realized here is that there is actually no openjpa logger in the java logging (java.util.logging.LogManager.getLogManager().getLoggerNames()). Does that mean that OpenJPA is not logging to a dedicated logger but just writes to SystemOut which is then processed by websphere?
I searched through all the different loggers and traces in the websphere console and tried a few, but none of them contained any openjpa logs. Can I assume that there is no other location where openjpa logs to in websphere?
To conclude: It's not working and I cannot use a handler for the openjpa logs because there are no logs generated. OpenJPA in websphere is just printing to the SystemOut which is internally used for the tracing. Does anyone have an idea what to do?
Alternatives would be:
- Use HPEL
- Script to filter the trace.log
But actually I would rather have a file handler for OpenJPA in Websphere.
Thanks for your help and I can supply you with some more information if you need that.
You can use application logging system for this purpose based on 3d party logging library for example logback.
logback is very powerful library.
How do I configure internal event monitoring in hsqldb? When I run my Java application, I get the following warnings:
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (HSQLDB2C7984E18B.org.hsqldb.persist.Logger).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
The documentation tells me log4j is not the only option, but it doesn't tell me how to configure my application. Can anyone point me to this documentation? Remember, I don't want to use log4j for hsqldb.
It bears mentioning that a 3rd-party jar I'm referencing requires log4j. Does hsqldb automatically detect that log4j is present and then attempt to use it? Or am I missing something fundamental about how logging works?
Check out this link. It says
The logging facility hands off to Log4j if Log4j is found in the classpath, and otherwise will hand off to java.util.logging.
The consequence of what the message indicates is that no logging for HSQLDB will take place because no appenders were found.
If you wish to suppress the message, add a line like the one below to the log4j.properties file:
log4j.logger.HSQLDB2C7984E18B.org.hsqldb.persist.Logger=FATAL
This will log only FATAL events, which wouldn't happen in normal operation.
You also state that you don't want to use log4j for HSQLDB. Software components that can use log4j leave the logging configuration (including level and where to log, etc.) to the log4j properties settings, which you can edit and configure.
In this case, the logger name is based on the "unique" database name which is initially autogenerated, but which you can change in HSQLDB.
Because as YWE noted hsqldb uses log4j by default if it is found in the classpath, I needed to figure out how to override the log4j.properties found in the 3rd-party library. This I managed to do as follows:
Copy the existing log4j.properties to my project, and add the following line at the beginning:
log4j.rootLogger=WARN, CONSOLE
Add the following VM Arguments:
-Dlog4j.log4j.defaultInitOverride=true
-Dlog4j.configuration=C:/full/path/to/my/log4j.properties
Make sure this line of code runs before anyone (e.g. hsqldb) attempts to use log4j:
org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configure("log4j.properties");