Recently we have migrated all our companies applications from Websphere to Tomcat application server. As part of this process we had performance testing done.
We found that couple of applications are having over 100% performance degradation in Tomcat. We increased the number of threads, we configured datasource settings to accommodate our test, we have also increased the read and write buffer sizes in the Tomcat server.
Application Background:
-> Spring Framework
-> Hibernate
-> Oracle 12c
-> JSPs
-> OpenJDK 8
We already checked the database and found no issues with performance in DB.
The CPU utilization while running the test is always less than 10%.
Heap settings are -xms = 1.5G to -xmx = 2G, and it never utilizes more than 1.2G.
We also have two nodes and HAProxy on top to balance the load. (We don't have a web server in place).
Despite our best efforts we couldn't pinpoint the issue that is causing the performance degradation. I am aware that this information isn't enough to provide a solution for our problem, however, any suggestion on how to proceed will be very helpful as we hit a dead-end and are unable to proceed.
Appreciate it if you can share any points that will be helpful in finding the issue.
Thanks.
Take Thread Dumps and analyze which part of application is having issues and start troubleshoot from there.
Follow this article for detailed explanation about Thread Dumps analysis - https://dzone.com/articles/how-analyze-java-thread-dumps
There are plenty of possible reasons for the problem you've mentioned and there really isn't much data to work with. Regardless of that, as kann commented a good way to start would be gathering Thread Dumps of the java process.
I'd also question if you're running in the same servers or if it's newly setup servers and how they are looking (resource-wise). Is there any CPU/Memory/IO constraints during the test?
Regarding the Xmx it sounds like you're not passing the -XX:+AlwaysPreTouch flag to the JVM but I would advice you to look into it as it will make the JVM zero the heap memory on start-up instead of doing it in runtime (which can mean a performance hit).
Related
I am running a java application on a Ubuntu 16.04 server. After extensive investigation I have discovered that the JVM heap size is more or less constant. At any rate there are no memory increase.
However, when I look at the server using htop the memory consumption of the server grows at an alarming rate. I am not sure what exactly is causing this but its 100% originating from java process.
I have looked at the hprof files but I cant really tell what Im looking for.
I am running two libs that might be responsible but I am not intimately familiar with them;
OrientDB (plocal)
Hazelcast
Im not sure if either / both of these would cause a memory increase outside the JVM.
Any advice on the best plan to help identify the problem would be great.
Thanks to #the8472, #davmac #qwwdfsad and #andrey-lomakin for your comments. I appreciate the details provided in the question where very thin but I was trying to avoid providing unrelated data that might lead down a rabbit whole.
I systematically tested each suggestion and it turns out that the problem was originating from OrientDB. I cant say 100% which of the following fixed the problem (possibly both). As per #andrey-lomakin suggestion I upgraded from 2.1.19 to 2.2-rc1. In doing this the applications batch inserts started throwing exceptions so I converted them all into single linear queries. Once compete the memory leak has gone.
As a side note in case it affects anybody else while testing for direct IO leak I did discover to my suprise that -Djdk.nio.maxCachedBufferSize=... works withJava(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-b14).
Let's say I have a very large Java application that's deployed on Tomcat. Over the course of a few weeks, the server will run out of memory, application performance is degraded, and the server needs a restart.
Obviously the application has some memory leaks that need to be fixed.
My question is.. If the application were deployed to a different server, would there be any change in memory utilization?
Certainly the services offered by the application server might vary in their memory utilization, and if the server includes its own unique VM -- i.e., if you're using J9 or JRockit with one server and Oracle's JVM with another -- there are bound to be differences. One relevant area that does matter is class loading: some app servers have better behavior than others with regard to administration. Warm-starting the application after a configuration change can result in serious memory leaks due to class loading problems on some server/VM combinations.
But none of these are really going to help you with an application that leaks. It's the program using the memory, not the server, so changing the server isn't going to affect much of anything.
There will probably be a slight difference in memory utilisation, but only in as much as the footprint differs between servlet containers. There is also a slight chance that you've encountered a memory leak with the container - but this is doubtful.
The most likely issue is that your application has a memory leak - in any case, the cause is more important than a quick fix - what would you do if the 'new' container just happens to last an extra week etc? Moving the problem rarely solves it...
You need to start analysing the applications heap memory, to locate the source of the problem. If your application is crashing with an OOME, you can add this to the JVM arguments.
-XX:-HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError
If the performance is just degrading until you restart the container manually, you should get into the routine of triggering periodic heap dumps. A timeline of dumps is often the most help, as you can see which object stores just grow over time.
To do this, you'll need a heap analysis tool:
JHat or IBM Heap Analyser or whatever your preference :)
Also see this question:
Recommendations for a heap analysis tool for Java?
Update:
And this may help (for obvious reasons):
How do I analyze a .hprof file?
I have a J2EE java application which processes SOAP requests. In our production environment (HPUX,OC4J,Java 5) we have about 20 threads running for this process, and we sometimes see 1 thread pausing for ~15 seconds. Until now, I haven't succeeded replicating the problem in our preproduction environment, and I'm scared of breaking stuff and violating SLA's if I use jconsole and associated tools on our production server.
Who has any inspiration? I know about http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/pdf/jdk50_ts_guide.pdf but I miss the experience to dare using it straight in production (plus, the HPUX guys threw some of these tools out of the toolbox, replacing them with HPJMeter)
Also, although this suggests a GC problem to me, I don't yet know enough to prove or disprove this theory and I am open to other suggestions.
We connect jconsole (and other tools) straight to production regularly. There is no significant overhead for us, the instrumentation is already going on within the JVM so you'd just be connecting a remote process to read published values. I say go for it!
Either way, you really need to see what's going on on the box. Thread dumps might or do some internal instrumentation. By internal instrumentation, I mean recording key measures within the code and exposing those somehow. It's essentially what the JVM does (exposing them via JMX) but rolling your own gives you more specificity. For example, I'm frequently recording request/response or other critical path performance timings internally.
oh, and one more thing. You can setup your app to using an agent to provide even more information. Typically this would be to plug a profiler in (like jprofiler or yourkit) but this does usually add more overhead and isn't recommended for production.
It's also worth thinking about the cost of not getting the information you need out of the VM. For example, is the cost of not fixing the issue more or less than the cost of a small % drop of performance when monitoring?
More scientifically, this article has some comments. It's suggesting up to 7% overhead (contradicting my previous point), a previous article from 2006 suggests 3-4% but both are highly contextual results. For example, CPU intensive applications may or may not be affected more than IO bound ones.
So a more appropriate answer from me (rather than just "go for it") would be to understand the impact it would have for your application in your environment through measurement. Run representative tests on a similar environment to production with jconsole connected and disconnected and see for your self.
Also see this stackoverflow question.
There are a few things that you can do on HP-UX to get additional information from a running Java process. If you send the PROF signal to the JVM, it will toggle the generation of a GC log (as if you had used the -Xverbosegc command line option). Generating the GC log is very inexpensive, so you should be able to turn this on in production without affecting the performance.
If you send the USR2 signal to the JVM, it starts profiling (same as -Xeprof). If you send the signal a second time, it turns off the profiling. This will have a noticeable performance impact, though it is smaller that what you would see from an external, third party profiler.
You can analyze the resulting data files using HPjmeter. HPjmeter can also connect to a running JVM for real-time monitoring. With Java 5, you need to start the JVM with the -agentlib option. If you were using Java 6, you could attach to the running JVM without needing any extra command line options.
I've developed a web application using the following tech stack:
Java
Mysql
Scala
Play Framework
DavMail integration (for calender and exchange server)
Javamail
Akka actors
On the first days, the application runs smoothly and without lags. But after 5 days or so, the application gets really slow! And now I have no clue how to profile this, since I have huge dependencies and it's hard to reproduce this kind of thing. I have looked into the memory and it seems that everything its okay.
Any pointers on the matter?
Try using VisualVM - you can monitor gc behaviour, memory usage, heap, threads, cpu usage etc. You can use it to connect to a remote VM.
`visualvm˙ is also a great tool for such purposes, you can connect to a remote JVM as well and see what's inside.
I suggest you doing this:
take a snapshot of the application running since few hours and since 5 days
compare thread counts
compare object counts, search for increasing numbers
see if your program spends more time in particular methods on the 5th day than on the 1str one
check for disk space, maybe you are running out of it
jconsole comes with the JDK and is an easy tool to spot bottlenecks. Connect it to your server, look into memory usage, GC times, take a look at how many threads are alive because it could be that the server creates many threads and they never exit.
I agree with tulskiy. On top of that you could also use JMeter if the investigations you will have made with jconsole are unconclusive.
The probable causes of the performances degradation are threads (that are created but never exit) and also memory leaks: if you allocate more and more memory, before having the OutOfMemoryError, you may encounter some performances degradation (happened to me a few weeks ago).
To eliminate your database you can monitor slow queries (and/or queries that are not using an index) using the slow query log
see: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/slow-query-log.html
I would hazard a guess that you have a missing index, and it has only become apparent as your data volumes have increased.
Yet another profiler is Yourkit.
It is commercial, but with trial period (two weeks).
Actually, I've firstly tried VisualVM as #axel22 suggested, but our remote server was ssh'ed and we had problems with connecting via VisualVM (not saying that it is impossible, I've just surrendered after a few hours).
You might just want to try the 'play status' command, which will list web app state (threads, jobs, etc). This might give you a hint on what's going on.
So guys, in this specific case, I was running play in Developer mode, which makes the compiler works every now and then.
After changing to production mode, everything was lightning fast and no more problems anymore. But thanks for all the help.
I've got a somewhat dated Java EE application running on Sun Application Server 8.1 (aka SJSAS, precursor to Glassfish). With 500+ simultaneous users the application becomes unacceptably slow and I'm trying to assist in identifying where most of the execution time is spent and what can be done to speed it up. So far, we've been experimenting and measuring with LoadRunner, the app server logs, Oracle statpack, snoop, adjusting the app server acceptor and session (worker) threads, adjusting Hibernate batch size and join fetch use, etc but after some initial gains we're struggling to improve matters more.
Ok, with that introduction to the problem, here's the real question: If you had a slow Java EE application running on a box whose CPU and memory use never went above 20% and while running with 500+ users you showed two things: 1) that requesting even static files within the same app server JVM process was exceedingly slow, and 2) that requesting a static file outside of the app server JVM process but on the same box was fast, what would you investigate?
My thoughts initially jumped to the application server threads, both acceptor and session threads, thinking that even requests for static files were being queued, waiting for an available thread, and if the CPU/memory weren't really taxed then more threads were in order. But then we upped both the acceptor and session threads substantially and there was no improvement.
Clarification Edits:
1) Static files should be served by a web server rather than an app server. I am using the fact that in our case this (unfortunately) is not the configuration so that I can see the app server performance for files that it doesn't execute -- therefore excluding any database performance costs, etc.
2) I don't think there is a proxy between the requesters and the app server but even if there was it doesn't seem to be overloaded because static files requested from the same application server machine but outside of the application's JVM instance return immediately.
3) The JVM heap size (Xmx) is set to 1GB.
Thanks for any help!
SunONE itself is a pain in the ass. I have a very same problem, and you know what? A simple redeploy of the same application to Weblogic reduced the memory consumption and CPU consumption by about 30%.
SunONE is a reference implementation server, and shouldn't be used for production (don't know about Glassfish).
I know, this answer doesn't really helps, but I've noticed considerable pauses even in a very simple operations, such as getting a bean instance from a pool.
May be, trying to deploy JBoss or Weblogic on the same machine would give you a hint?
P.S. You shouldn't serve static content from under application server (though I do it too sometimes, when CPU is abundant).
P.P.S. 500 concurrent users is quite high a load, I'd definetely put SunONE behind a caching proxy or Apache which serves static content.
After using a Sun performance monitoring tool we found that the garbage collector was running every couple seconds and that only about 100MB out of the 1GB heap was being used. So we tried adding the following JVM options and, so far, this new configuration as greatly improved performance.
-XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+AggressiveHeap
See http://java.sun.com/docs/performance/appserver/AppServerPerfFaq.html
Our lesson: don't leave JVM option tuning and garbage collection adjustments to the end. If you're having performance trouble, look at these settings early in your troubleshooting process.