class Bullet {
float bulletX, bulletY;
float angle;
int x;
int y;
int score; // add a score variable
static final float BULLET_SPEED = 5; // define a constant for the bullet's speed
Bullet(float x, float y, float angle) {
this.bulletX = x;
this.bulletY = y;
this.angle = angle;
}
// Updates the position of the bullet based on its angle and speed.
void update() {
bulletX += cos(angle) * BULLET_SPEED;
bulletY += sin(angle) * BULLET_SPEED;
}
// Draws the bullet image on the screen.
void show() {
drawBullet();
}
// Draws the bullet image on the screen.
void drawBullet() {
image(Bulletimg, bulletX, bulletY);
Bulletimg.resize(30, 30);
}
//Returns true if the bullet is off screen, false otherwise.
boolean offScreen() {
return bulletX < 0 || bulletX > width || bulletY < 0 || bulletY > height;
}
//Checks if the bullet hits the enemy, and updates the score and enemy position accordingly.
// check for collision
void checkCollision(Enemy e) {
float distance = dist(bulletX, bulletY, e.x, e.y);
if (distance < e.x / 2) {
// assuming enemy.size is the radius of the
}
}
}
I tried changing around the check collision(enemy e) block and I'm not sure how i would go about removing an enemy object and also updating my score. i've tried messing about with the draw(); method but i cant seem to figure it out without breaking my entire game. any help with this class would be much appreciated.
You can use/create some attribute in your Enemy object to know/check if is alive or death.
For example in your check collision you can add
if (distance < e.x / 2) {
// assuming enemy.size is the radius of the
e.alive = false
}
Edit: I dont know how your manage the Enemy object and if it can be modified directly in the check collision method if this is not possible then you need to find a way to have access inside the method or use a return and manage that return outside.
Related
I am making a little ant colony simulation in Processing (4).
I have an Ant class, with a sense() , a move()and a render() function.
I also have a Food class with only a position PVector.
My sense class loops through all Foods in a given radius, and it is meant to only 'see' the ones inside a given view angle.
In my render() function I have an arc to visualise this (I do some division and addition so the arc centres in front of the rectangle):
void render() {
// Draw a rectangl rotated in the direction of velocity
float theta = velocity.heading() + radians(90);
if(detectFood) // a Boolean set in sense()
fill(0,173,67); // turns green
else {
stroke(255);
pushMatrix();
translate(position.x, position.y);
fill(200, 100);
rotate(theta); // I copied the rotation code from somewhere :)
rect(0-r/2,0-r,r,r*2); // r is a float used to control size
arc(0, 0, viewRadius * 2, viewRadius * 2, radians(270 - viewAngle/2), radians(270 + viewAngle/2)); // viewRadius is a float set in the constructor
popMatrix();
}
}
This ends up looking like this:
My sense() code uses trigonometry to calculate the angle and the distance (I am using my own calculations because wasn't sure the inbuilt ones did what I thought they did):
void sense() {
if (!detectFood) {
float closest = viewRadius;
Food selected = null;
for (Food fd : foods){
float foodDist = position.dist(fd.position);
if(foodDist <= viewRadius) {
float xs = position.x-fd.position.x;
float ys = position.y-fd.position.y;
float Angle = atan2(abs(ys), abs(xs));
float begin = radians(270 - viewAngle/2);
float end = radians(270 + viewAngle/2);
if(begin < Angle && Angle < end && foodDist < closest){
selected = fd;
closest = foodDist;
println("found food");
}
}
}
if (selected != null){
detectFood = true;
foodFocused = selected;
}
} else {
if(position.dist(foodFocused.position) < r) {
takeFood();
detectFood = false;
}
}
}
The problem is that because I rotate the shape (and the arc with it), my sensing code basically never works. Is there a way to account for rotation in trigonometry or maybe an easier way of doing this? Any help would be apreciated
Rotating Asteroids ( Polygons )
I am trying to rotate asteroids(polygons) so that they look nice. I am doing this through multiple mathematical equations. To start I give the individual asteroid a rotation velocity:
rotVel = ((Math.random()-0.5)*Math.PI/16);
Then I create the polygon shape,
this.shape = new Polygon();
Followed by generating the points,
for (j = 0; j < s; j++) {
theta = 2 * Math.PI / s * j;
r = MIN_ROCK_SIZE + (int) (Math.random() * (MAX_ROCK_SIZE - MIN_ROCK_SIZE));
x = (int) -Math.round(r * Math.sin(theta)) + asteroidData[0];
y = (int) Math.round(r * Math.cos(theta)) + asteroidData[1];
shape.addPoint(x, y);
}
Finally, in a loop a method is being called in which it attempts to move the polygon and its points down as well as rotating them. (I'm just pasting the rotating part as the other one is working)
for (int i = 0; i < shape.npoints; i++) {
// Subtract asteroid's x and y position
double x = shape.xpoints[i] - asteroidData[0];
double y = shape.ypoints[i] - asteroidData[1];
double temp_x = ((x * Math.cos(rotVel)) - (y * Math.sin(rotVel)));
double temp_y = ((x * Math.sin(rotVel)) + (y * Math.cos(rotVel)));
shape.xpoints[i] = (int) Math.round(temp_x + asteroidData[0]);
shape.ypoints[i] = (int) Math.round(temp_y + asteroidData[1]);
}
now, the problem is that when it prints to the screen the asteroids appear to 'warp' or rather the x and y positions on some of the polygon points 'float' off course.
I've noticed that when I make 'rotVel' be a whole number the problem is solved however the asteroid will rotate at mach speeds. So I've concluded that the problem has to be in the rounding but no matter what I do I can't seem to find a way to get it to work as the Polygon object requires an array of ints.
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Currently your asteroids rotate around (0 , 0) as far as i can see. Correct would be to rotate them around the center of the shape, which would be (n , m), where n is the average of all x-coordinates of the shape, and m is the average of all y-coordinates of the shape.
Your problem is definitely caused by rounding to int! The first improvement is to make all shape coordinates to be of type double. This will solve most of your unwanted 'effects'.
But even with double you might experience nasty rounding errors in case you do a lot of very small updates of the coordinates. The solution is simple: Just avoid iterative updates of the asteroid points. Every time, you update the coordinates based on the previous coordinates, the rounding error will get worse.
Instead, add a field for the rotation angle to the shape and increment it instead of the points themselves. Not until drawing the shape, you compute the final positions by applying the rotation to the points. Note that this will never change the points themselves.
You can extend this concept to other transformations (e.g. translation) too. What you get is some kind of local coordinate system for every shape/object. The points of the shape are defined in the local coordinate system. By moving and rotating this system, you can reposition the entire object anywhere in space.
public class Shape {
// rotation and position of the local coordinate system
private double rot, x, y;
// points of the shape in local coordinate system
private double[] xp, yp;
private int npoints;
// points of the shape in world coordinates
private int[][] wxp, wyp;
private boolean valid;
public void setRotation(double r) { this.rot = r; valid = false; }
public void setPosition(double x, double y) { this.x = x; this.y = y; valid = false; }
public void addPoint(double x, double y) {
// TODO: add point to xp, yp
valid = false;
}
public void draw(...) {
if (!valid) {
computeWorldCoordinates(wxp, wyp);
valid = true;
}
// TODO: draw shape at world coordaintes wxp and wyp
}
protected void computeWorldCoordinates(int[] xcoord, int[] ycoord) {
for (int i = 0; i < npoints; i++) {
double temp_x = xp[i] * Math.cos(rot) - yp[i] * Math.sin(rot);
double temp_y = xp[i] * Math.sin(rot) + yp[i] * Math.cos(rot);
xcoord[i] = (int) Math.round(x + temp_x);
ycoord[i] = (int) Math.round(y + temp_y);
}
}
}
I'm working on a simple game and i need these squareBumpers which simply stands idle and when got hit, collides and reflects the ball. But currently the ball just flies through my squareBumpers. I can only use java awt and swing libraries. Here's the code:
class squareBumper {
private int x = 300;
private int y = 300;
private Color color = new Color(66,139,139);
public void paint(Graphics g) {
Rectangle clipRect = g.getClipBounds();
g.setColor(color);
g.fillRect(x, y, 31, 31);
}
}
class BouncingBall {
// Overview: A BouncingBall is a mutable data type. It simulates a
// rubber ball bouncing inside a two dimensional box. It also
// provides methods that are useful for creating animations of the
// ball as it moves.
private int x = 320;
private int y = 598;
public static double vx;
public static double vy;
private int radius = 6;
private Color color = new Color(0, 0, 0);
public void move() {
// modifies: this
// effects: Move the ball according to its velocity. Reflections off
// walls cause the ball to change direction.
x += vx;
if (x <= radius) { x = radius; vx = -vx; }
if (x >= 610-radius) { x = 610-radius; vx = -vx; }
y += vy;
if (y <= radius) { y = radius; vy = -vy; }
if (y >= 605-radius) { y = 605-radius; vy = -vy; }
}
public void randomBump() {
// modifies: this
// effects: Changes the velocity of the ball by a random amount
vx += (int)((Math.random() * 10.0) - 5.0);
vx = -vx;
vy += (int)((Math.random() * 10.0) - 5.0);
vy = -vy;
}
public void paint(Graphics g) {
// modifies: the Graphics object <g>.
// effects: paints a circle on <g> reflecting the current position
// of the ball.
// the "clip rectangle" is the area of the screen that needs to be
// modified
Rectangle clipRect = g.getClipBounds();
// For this tiny program, testing whether we need to redraw is
// kind of silly. But when there are lots of objects all over the
// screen this is a very important performance optimization
if (clipRect.intersects(this.boundingBox())) {
g.setColor(color);
g.fillOval(x-radius, y-radius, radius+radius, radius+radius);
}
}
public Rectangle boundingBox() {
// effect: Returns the smallest rectangle that completely covers the
// current position of the ball.
// a Rectangle is the x,y for the upper left corner and then the
// width and height
return new Rectangle(x-radius, y-radius, radius+radius+1, radius+radius+1);
}
}
Take a look at the classes that implement the Shape interface. There are ellipses and other shapes, and they all implement a intersects(Rectangle2D) method. It might help you if you don't want to perform intersection yourself.
As for dealing with the collision, well, it depends on the level of accuracy you want. Simply deflecting the ball of edges is quite easy. Just determine whether the collided side of the rectangle is vertical or horizontal, and negate the corresponding velocity component accordingly. If you want to handle the corners, well that is a bit more complicated.
You need to detect when the ball has collided with the bumper. You have the boundingBox() method of BouncingBall, this will get you a rectangle that contains your ball. So you need to check if this rectangle intersects your square bumper (which implies a collision), and then do something with that.
I'm trying to make a java 2d game, and it seems to work out fine in general. The only problem is, that I can't figure out how to place my "delta" time, to make the movements move the same on 30 FPS as on 1000 FPS.
This is my code for the Entity class:
import java.awt.Rectangle;
import map.Tile;
import graphics.Sprite;
public class Entity {
private String name;
private float positionx, positiony; // Current coordinate
private int targetx,targety; // Target coordinate
private double vx, vy; // Current vector
private double lx, ly; // Last vector
private float speed;
private Sprite sprite;
public Entity(String name, int x, int y, Sprite sprite){
this.name = name;
this.speed = 1f;
this.positionx = x;
this.positiony = y;
this.sprite = sprite;
main.Main.e.addEntity(this); // These kind of calls are ugly, and should be fixed.
}
public void remove(){
main.Main.e.removeEntity(this);
sprite.remove();
}
public void setVector(double vx, double vy){
this.vx = vx;
this.vy = vy;
}
public void update(long delta){
//Multiply modifier to make it act the same on 30 fps as 1000 fps.
vx = vx*delta;
vy = vy*delta;
// Calculate vector
double distance = Math.sqrt((vx * vx) + (vy * vy));
if(distance > 0){ // Have we reached the target yet?
vx = ((vx / distance));
vy = ((vy / distance));
}else{
vx = 0;
vy = 0;
}
//Check collision with objects:
Rectangle rx = new Rectangle((int) (vx+positionx), (int)positiony, 32, 32);
Rectangle ry = new Rectangle((int) positionx, (int)(vy+positiony), 32, 32);
for(Entity e : main.Main.e.getEntities()){
if(this != e){
if(isIntersecting(rx, e.getBounds())){
vx = 0; // Disallow x direction.
}
if(isIntersecting(ry, e.getBounds())){
vy = 0; // Disallow y direction.
}
}
}
//Check tiles:
for(Tile t : main.Main.m.getNeighbours(positionx,positiony)){
if(t.isBlocking()){
if(isIntersecting(rx, t.getBounds())){
vx = 0;
}
if(isIntersecting(ry, t.getBounds())){
vy = 0;
}
}
}
//Update the position:
positionx += vx*speed;
positiony += vy*speed;
//Animate:
animate(vx, vy);
}
public boolean isIntersecting(Rectangle r1, Rectangle r2){
return r1.intersects(r2);
}
public Rectangle getBounds(){
return new Rectangle((int) positionx,(int) positiony,32,32);
}
public void setMoveTo(int x, int y){
this.targetx = x;
this.targety = y;
}
//This function is used by the bots, and not on players (they are setting the vector and use update directly):
public void moveTo(long delta){
setVector((targetx-positionx),(targety-positiony));
update(delta);
}
public void animate(double dx, double dy){
sprite.setPosition((int)positionx, (int)positiony);
if(dx > 0){
sprite.setAnimation(0, 7, 100); // Walk right.
}else if(dx < 0){
sprite.setAnimation(1, 7, 100); // Walk left.
}else{
if(lx > 0){
sprite.setAnimation(2, 3, 200); // Stand right.
}else if(lx < 0){
sprite.setAnimation(3, 3, 200); // Stand left.
}
}
lx = dx;
ly = dy;
}
}
The two problems, that I always run into:
1# The game runs differently on 60FPS than on 500FPS.
2# The game runs the same on 60FPS as 500FPS, but my collision screws up, and I can't move closer than 15px from the other object. I think I need to implement something like: If I can't get 10px closer, then move it 10px closer, but I don't know how to implement it.
How can I implement it correctly? That would help a lot!
The easiest way would be to consider that if you want a constant displacement with a constant velocity you can scale all the deltas relative to the delta of 30 FPS like so:
So if you run at 60 FPS but want the same displacement as on 30FPS alpha would be (1/30)/(1/60) = 2
So
Remove vx = vx*delta;
vy = vy*delta;
and change your position update to
alpha = (1.0/30)*delta;
positionx += alpha*vx*speed;
positiony += alpha*vy*speed;
This is only a crude solution, let me know how it works, I will drop in later and update for a more correct solution (taking into account that delta is not always 1/FPS due to rendering and computation taking some time).
Edit: Variable delta will come later. But some optimizations:
You don't need to construct a rectangle in both Y and X for collisiondetection, try drawing two rectangles, if they intersect they do so on both axis. Just create a rectangle from vx + posx, vy+posy and check for intersection with this.
The above should half your collisionchecks. For further optimization consider using a QuadTree an implementation can be found here.
For the problem of "blocky" collision testing (where you stop X pixels from the blocking object). You can do the following, in pseudocode:
if(new position will make this colide)
while(this.position is more than one pixel away from blocking object)
keep moving one pixel
This will make you stop 1px from the target.
So I understand that I'm not coding this the best way possible at the moment; this is a sort of test run. What I'm trying to do is wall collisions using rectangles and the intersects property (sorry if I'm not using the correct terminology). So far I have 2 rectangles on screen. 1 the player controls and the other which the play is colliding with. When they collide the player stops moving. The problem is that if the player is trying to move into the rectangle while they are already colliding then the player can't move in any direction perpendicular to the movement ie if the player is holding the right arrow key moving into the rectangle, then they cannot move up or down. The game works on the premise that if your x or y coordinates aren't valid, then you will be moved back to the last valid coordinate recorded but I'm having trouble detecting the valid x and y coordinate separately. Here is the code:
public void Collision()
{
if(x < 0)
x = 0;
if(x > 400 - width)
x = 400 - width;
if(y < 0)
y = 0;
if(y > 300 - height)
y = 300 - height;
rect1 = new Rectangle(x, y, 16, 16);
rect2 = new Rectangle(sx, sy, wid, hei);
if(!rect1.intersects(rect2))
{
validX = true;
validY = true;
}
else
{
validX = false;
validY = false;
}
if(validX)
{
lastValidX = x;
}
if(validY)
{
lastValidY = y;
}
if(!validX)
{
x = lastValidX;
}
if(!validY)
{
y = lastValidY;
}
}
The Collision() method in the Guy class is where I'm having the trouble I believe. Yes my code is pretty messy right now but this is only a test.
Thanks, David.
You can implement what you're describing by doing extra logic around here (i.e. detecting cases when one is false and the other is true):
if(!rect1.intersects(rect2))
{
validX = true;
validY = true;
}
else
{
validX = false;
validY = false;
}
However, it seems like maybe you shouldn't be allowing the rectangles to ever be in a "colliding" state in the first place. For example, you can change the Move method to do something like
public void Move()
{
int oldX = x, oldY = y;
x += dx;
y += dy;
if (Collision()) {
x = oldX;
y = oldY;
}
}