I need a suggestion to solve the following problem.
I have two web applications (let's say WEBAPP-A and WEBAPP-B) running under the same application server. Each login page in each application page activates a specific applet
(let's call them JAPP-A and JAPP-B, respectively). These two applets need to use the same DLL.
Each applet (JAPP-A or JAPP-B) works OK when accessing the application separately (in our case the browser used is Internet Explorer 8.0 and the JRE version of the client is 1.7.0_45). However, when redirecting from WEBAPP-A to WEBAPP-B, the applet JAPP-B crashes.
I get the error:
UnsatisfiedLinkError: 'DLL already loaded in another classloader'
So I have tried to use the same classloader for JAPP-A and JAPP-B by setting the same CODEBASE value inside the applet tag and deploying the JAR containing the JAPP-B code under the CODEBASE path, but we got the same error message.
Can anyone suggest an alternative approach in order to get the applet JAPP-B working correctly?
Deploy each applet in it's own Java Virtual Machine. E.G. from Applet Deployment Parameters: separate_jvm.
<APPLET archive="my_applet.jar" code="MyApplet" width="300" height="300">
<PARAM name="java_arguments" value="...">
<!-- use a separate JVM for this applet! -->
<PARAM name="separate_jvm" value="true">
</APPLET>
I'm trying to embed a Java applet that I just made into an HTML 5 compliant page. I'm using the following tag to embed the .jar file:
<object type="application/x-java-applet" height="300" width="550">
<param name="code" value="MainClassName" />
<param name="archive" value="MyJarFileName.jar" />
Applet failed to run. No Java plug-in was found.
</object>
The java applet will try to run but stop with:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
I'm having trouble finding what is the cause of this error. My .jar file will run fine on its own. The main class extends JApplet, which contains a frame, which contains a JPanel.
What is causing this error?
I'm interested in hearing how you prefer to automate Javascript minification for your Java web apps. Here are a few aspects I'm particularly interested in:
How does it integrate? Is it part of your build tool, a servlet filter, a standalone program post-processing the WAR file, or something else?
Is it easy to enable and disable? It's very unfunny to try and debug a minified script, but it's also useful for a developer to be able to test that the minification doesn't break anything.
Does it work transparently, or does it have any side effects (apart from the ones inherent in minification) that I have to consider in my day-to-day work?
Which minifier does it use?
Does it lack any features that you can think of?
What do you like about it?
What don't you like about it?
This will mostly serve as a reference for my future projects (and hopefully other SOer's will find it informative, too), so all kinds of tools are interesting.
(Note that this is not a question about which minifier is best. We have plenty of those around already.)
Round-up post
If you post something new in this thread, edit this post to link to yours.
Ant apply task (using YUI Compressor)
Custom YUI Compressor Ant task
Maven YUI Compressor plugin
Granule (for JSP, JSF, Grails, Ant)
Ant macros for Google Closure compiler
wro4j (Maven, servlet filters, plain Java, etc)
ant-yui-compressor (ant task for compressing JS+CSS)
JAWR
Minify Maven Plugin
humpty
Ant exec task using Terser
We are using Ant task to minify js files with YUICompressor during production build and put result into a separated folder. Then we upload those files to a web server.
Here is an example:
<target name="js.minify" depends="js.preprocess">
<apply executable="java" parallel="false">
<fileset dir="." includes="foo.js, bar.js"/>
<arg line="-jar"/>
<arg path="yuicompressor.jar"/>
<srcfile/>
<arg line="-o"/>
<mapper type="glob" from="*.js" to="*-min.js"/>
<targetfile/>
</apply>
</target>
I think one of the best and right tool for the job is wro4j Check out https://github.com/wro4j/wro4j
It does everything you need:
Keep project web resources (js & css) well organized
Merge & minify them at run-time (using a simple filter) or build-time (using maven plugin)
Free and open source: Released under an Apache 2.0 license
several minification tools supported by wro4j: JsMin, Google Closure compressor, YUI etc
Very easy to use. Supports Servlet Filter, Plain Java or Spring Configuration
Javascript and CSS Meta Frameworks Support: CoffeeScript, Less, Sass etc
Validation: JSLint, CSSLint etc
Can run in debug as well as production modes. Just specify all the files it should handle/pre-process and it does the rest.
You can simply include merged, minified and compressed resource like this:
<script type="text/javascript" src="wro/all.js"></script>
I have written ant macros for Google Closure compiler and Yahoo compressor and include this file in different web projects.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- CSS and JS minifier. -->
<!DOCTYPE project>
<project name="minifier" basedir=".">
<property name="gc" value="compiler-r1592.jar" />
<property name="yc" value="yuicompressor-2.4.6.jar" />
<!-- Compress single js with Google Closure compiler -->
<macrodef name="gc-js">
<attribute name="dir" />
<attribute name="src" />
<sequential>
<java jar="${gc}" fork="true">
<!--
- - compilation_level WHITESPACE_ONLY | SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS | ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS
Specifies the compilation level to use. Default: SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS
- - warning_level QUIET | DEFAULT | VERBOSE
Specifies the warning level to use.
-->
<arg line="--js=#{dir}/#{src}.js" />
<arg line="--js_output_file=#{dir}/#{src}-min-gc.js" />
</java>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
<!-- Compress single js with Yahoo compressor -->
<macrodef name="yc-js">
<attribute name="dir" />
<attribute name="src" />
<sequential>
<java jar="${yc}" fork="true">
<arg value="#{dir}/#{src}.js" />
<arg line="-o" />
<arg value="#{dir}/#{src}-min-yc.js" />
</java>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
<!-- Compress all js in directory with Yahoo compressor -->
<macrodef name="yc-js-all">
<attribute name="dir" />
<sequential>
<apply executable="java" parallel="false">
<fileset dir="#{dir}" includes="*.js" excludes="*-min*.js" />
<arg line="-jar" />
<arg path="${yc}" />
<srcfile />
<arg line="-o" />
<mapper type="glob" from="*.js" to="#{dir}/*-min-yc.js" />
<targetfile />
</apply>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
<!-- Compress all css in directory with Yahoo compressor -->
<macrodef name="yc-css-all">
<attribute name="dir" default="${build.css.dir}" />
<sequential>
<apply executable="java" parallel="false">
<fileset dir="#{dir}" includes="*.css" excludes="*-min*.css" />
<arg line="-jar" />
<arg path="${yc}" />
<arg line="-v --line-break 0" />
<srcfile />
<arg line="-o" />
<mapper type="glob" from="*.css" to="#{dir}/*-min.css" />
<targetfile />
</apply>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
</project>
Integration: <import file="build-minifier.xml" /> in your build.xml, then invoke as usual ant tasks: <gc-js dir="${build.js.dir}" src="prototype" /> <yc-js-all dir="${build.js.dir}" />
Choice of two minifiers: Google Closure compiler and Yahoo compressor, you should download them manually and place near the xml file
Minifiers skip already compressed files (ending with -min*)
Usually I make three versions of script: uncompressed (e.g. prototype.js) for debugging, compressed with closure compiler (prototype-min-gc.js) for production server, compressed with Yahoo (prototype-min-yc.js) for troubleshooting because closure compiler uses risky optimizations and sometimes produces invalid compressed file and Yahoo compressor is more safe
Yahoo compressor can minify all files in a dir with single macro, Closure compiler cannot
I tried two ways:
using a servlet filter. When in production mode, the filter is activated and it compress any data bounded to URL like *.css or *.js
using maven and yuicompressor-maven-plugin; the compression is perfomed una-tantum, (when assembling the production war)
Of course the latter solution is better since it does not consume resources at runtime (my webapp is using google app engine) and it doesn't complicate your application code. So assume this latter case in the following answers:
How does it integrate? Is it part of your build tool, a servlet filter, a standalone program post-processing the WAR file, or something else?
using maven
Is it easy to enable and disable? It's very unfunny to try and debug a minified script, but it's also useful for a developer to be able to test that the minification doesn't break anything.
you activate it only when assemblying the final war; in development mode you see the uncompressed version of your resources
Does it work transparently, or does it have any side effects (apart from the ones inherent in minification) that I have to consider in my day-to-day work?
absolutely
Which minifier does it use?
YUI compressor
Does it lack any features that you can think of?
no, it is very complete and easy to use
What do you like about it?
it is integrated with my favourite tool (maven) and the plugin is in the central repository (a good maven citizen)
I think you need a compression library, for example Granule tag.
http://code.google.com/p/granule/
It gzip and combine javascripts wrapped by g:compress tag using different methods, also has Ant task as well
code sample is:
<g:compress>
<script type="text/javascript" src="common.js"/>
<script type="text/javascript" src="closure/goog/base.js"/>
<script>
goog.require('goog.dom');
goog.require('goog.date');
goog.require('goog.ui.DatePicker');
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var dp = new goog.ui.DatePicker();
dp.render(document.getElementById('datepicker'));
</script>
</g:compress>
...
I'm really surprised no one mentioned JAWR - https://j-a-w-r.github.io
It's pretty mature and supports all standard features that are to be expected, and a bit more. Here is how it holds against the OP's excellent criteria.
How does it integrate? Is it part of your build tool, a servlet
filter, a standalone program post-processing the WAR file, or
something else?
It originally did the processing/heavy-lifting at application startup and serving was based on a servlet. Starting with 3.x they added support for integrating at build time.
Support for JSP and Facelets is provided through a custom JSP tag library to import processed resources. In addition to that, a JS resources loader is implemented which supports loading the resources from static HTML pages.
Is it easy to enable and disable? It's very unfunny to try and debug a
minified script, but it's also useful for a developer to be able to
test that the minification doesn't break anything.
A debug=on option is available to use before application startup, and a custom GET parameter can be specified at individual requests in production to toggle debug mode selectively at runtime for said request.
Which minifier does it use?
For JS it supports YUI Compressor and JSMin, for CSS I'm not sure.
Does it lack any features that you can think of?
SASS support comes to mind. That said, it does support LESS.
Really late to the party here, but figured this might help someone still looking for a different answer:
After trying to use YUI Compressor, I was disappointed that it was incompatible with more recent versions of jQuery and Prism (the two main 3rd party JS libraries I needed for my project which I wanted compressed into a single file). So I decided to use Terser, which is a fork of Uglify-JS that supports ES6+. I wasn't able to get it to run directly using the <exec> task, but using the Windows command line method works for Win 10, at least (not saying it can't work otherwise, but this was a very easy work-around). No need to add anything else to the Path system variable (as Node.JS is typically added during installation). I first use the ANT <concat> task to make a big, uncompressed file. Use <fileset> as it will preserve the order (if that's important, anyway).
<concat destfile="${js-big-file}" encoding="UTF-8" outputencoding="UTF-8" fixlastline="true">
<filelist refid="js-input-filelist"/>
</concat>
Then use the <exec> task to run any NPM program, such as Terser. The Apache manual page on this task indicated this is the Windows workaround for running .bat files, but it really allows you run just about any command line application (even those that <exec> mysteriously cannot find otherwise).
<exec executable="cmd">
<arg value="/c"/>
<arg value="terser"/>
<arg value="${js-big-file}" />
<arg value="-o" />
<arg value="${smaller-js-file}"/>
</exec>
Integrate? It is part of an ANT build script (a DITA Open Toolkit plugin to support custom JavaScript, among other things - not a Java Web application, per se, but using Java to build HTML5 output), so integration was not much more than adding those tasks to a new target (there's more code regarding setting defaults and checking input parameters!).
Easy to Enable/Disable? In my case, I have a parameter I pass to the ANT Build in order to include building and minifying the JS file. So yes, it only performs this target if I set the param to 'Yes'. That's a pretty easy thing to set up in an ANT build.
Transparent So far, it appears to have no effect on any of the several JS files I'm including. Some of those are my own (and I'm no JS expert, by any means) and some are, as I mentioned, common JS libraries.
Minifier Terser, but you could use just about any minified with command line input with this method.
Lack features? Terser only works with JavaScript. If I want to do the same for my CSS files (which I do), I use YUI Compressor.
Like That it is a currently active project and has good support. Plus, the current implementation (only calling it via the ANT <exec> target) allows me to swap out minifiers should I need to use something else down the road.
Don't like That it requires Node.JS. Nothing against Node.JS, mind you, just that this particular project doesn't need it otherwise. I'd much prefer to use a Java .jar file like YUI Compressor for this (I can easily distribute that with a plugin should I need to).
Our project has handled it a number of ways but we have continued to use the YUI Compressor through our different iterations.
We initially had a servlet handle the compression for JavaScript the first time that particular file was accessed; it was then cached. We already had a system in place to handle custom property files so we simply updated our configuration files to support enabling or disabling the compressor depending on the environment we were working in.
Now the development environments never use compressed JavaScript for debugging purposes. Instead we handle the compression in our build process when exporting our application to a WAR file.
Our client has never raised concerns about the compression and the developers don't notice it until they decide to debug JavaScript. So I'd say it's rather transparent with minimal, if any, side affects.
This worked for me: https://bitbucket.org/m6_russell_francis/yui-compressor-ant-task/wiki/Home
<!-- minimize all static *.css & *.js content -->
<target name="static-content-minify">
<taskdef name="yuicompressor"
classname="com.metrosix.yuicompressor.anttask.YuiCompressorTask">
<classpath>
<pathelement location="${jar.yui.compressor}"/>
<pathelement location="${jar.yui.anttask.compressor}" />
</classpath>
</taskdef>
<yuicompressor todir="${build.static.content.min}" charset="utf-8"
preserveallsemicolons="true" munge="true" >
<fileset dir="${src.static.content}">
<include name="**/*.css"/>
<include name="**/*.js"/>
</fileset>
</yuicompressor>
</target>
I'm writing a framework for managing web assets, called humpty. It aims to be simpler and more modern than jawr or wro4j by using WebJars and ServiceLoaders.
How does it integrate? Is it part of your build tool, a servlet filter, a standalone program post-processing the WAR file, or something else?
In development, a servlet processes the assets as necessary. The assets would then be pre-compiled before production and placed in a public folder, so that the only part that is used is generating the correct includes in the HTML.
Is it easy to enable and disable? It's very unfunny to try and debug a minified script, but it's also useful for a developer to be able to test that the minification doesn't break anything.
That would be done by switching between development and production modes.
Does it work transparently, or does it have any side effects (apart from the ones inherent in minification) that I have to consider in my day-to-day work?
I believe it is transparent, but does strongly favour the use of WebJars.
Which minifier does it use?
Whichever one the plugin you put on your classpath uses. Currently looking at writing a plugin for the Google Closure Compiler.
Does it lack any features that you can think of?
Still pre-release, though I'm using it in production. The maven plugin still needs a lot of work.
What do you like about it?
The simplicity of just adding a dependency to configure the framework
What don't you like about it?
It's my baby, I love it all ;)
I searched for this subject on Google and got some website about an experts exchange...so I figured I should just ask here instead.
How do you embed a JApplet in HTML on a webpage?
Here is an example from sun's website:
<applet code="TumbleItem.class"
codebase="examples/"
archive="tumbleClasses.jar, tumbleImages.jar"
width="600" height="95">
<param name="maxwidth" value="120">
<param name="nimgs" value="17">
<param name="offset" value="-57">
<param name="img" value="images/tumble">
Your browser is completely ignoring the <APPLET> tag!
</applet>
Although you didn't say so, just in case you were using JSPs, you also have the option of the jsp:plugin tag?
Use the <applet> tag. For more info: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/deployment/applet/html.html