Does somebody know a Java library which serializes a Java object hierarchy into Java code which generates this object hierarchy? Like Object/XML serialization, only that the output format is not binary/XML but Java code.
Serialised data represents the internal data of objects. There isn't enough information to work out what methods you would need to call on the objects to reproduce the internal state.
There are two obvious approaches:
Encode the serialised data in a literal String and deserialise that.
Use java.beans XML persistence, which should be easy enough to process with your favourite XML->Java source technique.
I am not aware of any libraries that will do this out of the box but you should be able to take one of the many object to XML serialisation libraries and customise the backend code to generate Java. Would probably not be much code.
For example a quick google turned up XStream. I've never used it but is seems to support multiple backends other than XML - e.g. JSON. You can implement your own writer and just write out the Java code needed to recreate the hierarchy.
I'm sure you could do the same with other libraries, in particular if you can hook into a SAX event stream.
See:
HierarchicalStreamWriter
Great question. I was thinking about serializing objects into java code to make testing easier. The use case would be to load some data into a db, then generate the code creating an object and later use this code in test methods to initialize data without the need to access the DB.
It is somehow true that the object state doesn't contain enough info to know how it's been created and transformed, however, for simple java beans there is no reason why this shouldn't be possible.
Do you feel like writing a small library for this purpose? I'll start coding soon!
XStream is a serialization library I used for serialization to XML. It should be possible and rather easy to extend it so that it writes Java code.
Related
As part of my RFT QA Automation, I have to store the state(Object) of Java bean and should access the object across the whole application, Singleton may not work here as it is not a web application, would you please suggest any other approach to store the state of java beans.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
I'm not sure to understand your problem but why not:
serialize the objects to disk/database/...
use a static store (static singleton)
Basically it is a typical Serialization/Deserialization issue. In general you need an ability to write the state of the class on to persistant layer and then to be able to restore the "same" instance from persistant layer. There is a built-in Java mechanizm that works through Serializable interface. However it is rarely used due to its inconvinience. One of te most popular ways to do this is to Serialize your class instances into JSON or XML format and then read it back and instanciate it from that format. If you need the Text to be human readable XML is preferred, otherwise JSON is the usual choice. The best tool to use for JSON serialization is JSON Jackson (FasterXML/jackson) Here are the relevant links: Json Jackson home. The main class that you will need to use is ObjectMapper. It is easy to use. Here is an article with example. Once you get a Json String of your instance write it into a file or DB and then read it and use ObjectMapper to -recreate your instance. It is simple and works very well
I'd like to create a web API of some kind (I don't have a preference for the protocol), where the server uses Java and the client uses PHP.
I want the request and response to both be objects (instances of classes, not JSON-style hashes). The objects' fields can be primitive types or other objects. I would define all the necessary classes in both the client and server code. PHP and Java have similar object models, so it shouldn't be hard to write corresponding classes in both languages.
To make this work, there would need to be some automated way to serialize an object on one side, and unserialize it on the other. It would need to know which PHP class maps to which Java class, and how to convert the fields. I could write something, but is there an existing protocol for transferring objects like this? Can this be done with SOAP?
Java and PHP objects are not interchangeable. You will have to define the object types on both ends, and the transfer protocol could be anything you like. Serialization and deserialization makes the whole process transparent. The transport medium could be JSON, XML, YAML, or anything else for that matter.
For a record-like objects:
{"_type":"MyCoolObjectType", "a":1, "b":2, "c":3"}
If you're wanting to write once and use everywhere, I'd recommend using the same language on both ends, otherwise you'll have to have a compiler that can translate between your choice languages.
A SOAP web service can handle the basic abstraction as long as the request/response is not very complex. You can create the classes in java and then get the API to export a WSDL for them.
You need to have them both serialize to the same string. The PHP format and Java format for serialization are different, and therefore incompatible. You need a common exchange format, and I recommend that you DON'T use PHP's. However, the functions to serialize in PHP are fairly simple, are contained in ext/standard/var.c file in the PHP source if you choose to use it..
See the following:
Unserialize in Java a serialized php object - A similar question to yours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serialization#Serialization_formats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML
XML, API, CSV, SOAP! Understanding the Alphabet Soup of Data Exchange
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML (emphasis mine):
Although the design of XML focuses on documents, it is widely used for the representation of arbitrary data structures, for example in web services.
I've got to write a multithreaded chat program, using a server and clients but each message sent has to be in XML.
Is it simpler/easier just to write out all the code in java, and then try and somehow alter it so the messages are sent in XMl format, or would it be simpler just to try and go for it in XML and hope it works. I'll admit I don't know that much about XML. :)
Also any links to any relevant online help/tutorials would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
When messing with XML in Java, PLEASE consider using JAXB or something similar. It allows you to work with a normal object graph in memory and then serialize that to XML in one operation (and the other way around).
Manipulating XML through the DOM API is a slow way to lose your sanity, do not do it for any non-trivial amount of XML.
I fail to see what the program being multithreaded or a server have to do with it though...
Check out XStream. You can use this to marshall a normal Java object into XML, and back again into an object, without having to do anything instrusive like define interfaces or specify schema etc. i.e. it works out of the box for objects you already have defined. For most cases it's seamless in its default mode.
XStream produces a direct XML serialised representation of a Java object (i.e. XML elements represent each field of a Java object directly). You can customise this further as/when you require. If you want to define persisted objects in terms of schema (XSD) then it's not appropriate. However if you're transporting objects where persistence is short-term and you're not worried about conforming to some schema then it's definitely of use.
e.g.
Person person = new Person("Brian Agnew");
XStream xStream = new XStream();
System.out.println(xStream.toXML(person));
and conversion from XML to the Person object is similarly trivial.
(note XStream is thread-safe)
There is something called XML RPC. This examples pretty much shows what you're looking for:
http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/xml/jxml/ch11_02.htm
It would be simpler to use existing XMPP clients and servers and not write your own at all.
If this is in fact homework, then I would suggest writing the client and server as you have suggested, using all java, but use a String as the message. You can then easily add parsing of the string to/from XML when all other parts are working.
I would suggest to also have a look at Betwixt and Digester. For Digester there are some tutorials which can be found in the Digister-wiki. Betwixt provides some pretty good tutorials right on its website.
Additionally to these two tools there is a list of alternatives that can be found in the Reference section of http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Digester/WhyUseDigester
You're on the right page trying to break the task into smaller pieces.
I have a certain POJO which needs to be persisted on a database, current design specifies its field as a single string column, and adding additional fields to the table is not an option.
Meaning, the objects need to be serialized in some way. So just for the basic implementation I went and designed my own serialized form of the object which meant concatenating all it's fields into one nice string, separated by a delimiter I chose. But this is rather ugly, and can cause problems, say if one of the fields contains my delimiter.
So I tried basic Java serialization, but from a basic test I conducted, this somehow becomes a very costly operation (building a ByteArrayOutputStream, an ObjectOutputStream, and so on, same for the deserialization).
So what are my options? What is the preferred way for serializing objects to go on a database?
Edit: this is going to be a very common operation in my project, so overhead must be kept to a minimum, and performance is crucial. Also, third-party solutions are nice, but irrelevant (and usually generate overhead which I am trying to avoid)
Elliot Rusty Harold wrote up a nice argument against using Java Object serialization for the objects in his XOM library. The same principles apply to you. The built-in Java serialization is Java-specific, fragile, and slow, and so is best avoided.
You have roughly the right idea in using a String-based format. The problem, as you state, is that you're running into formatting/syntax problems with delimiters. The solution is to use a format that is already built to handle this. If this is a standardized format, then you can also potentially use other libraries/languages to manipulate it. Also, a string-based format means that you have a hope of understanding it just by eyeballing the data; binary formats remove that option.
XML and JSON are two great options here; they're standardized, text-based, flexible, readable, and have lots of library support. They'll also perform surprisingly well (sometimes even faster than Java serialization).
You might try Protocol Buffers, it is a open-source project from Google, it is said to be fast (generates shorter serialized form than XML, and works faster). It also handles addition of new field gently (inserts default values).
You need to consider versioning in your solution. Data incompatibility is a problem you will experience with any solution that involves the use of a binary serialization of the Object. How do you load an older row of data into a newer version of the object?
So, the solutions above which involve serializing to a name/value pairs is the approach you probably want to use.
One solution is to include a version number as one of field values. As new fields are added, modified or removed then the version can be modified.
When deserializing the data, you can have different deserialization handlers for each version which can be used to convert data from one version to another.
XStream or YAML or OGNL come to mind as easy serialization techniques. XML has been the most common, but OGNL provides the most flexibility with the least amount of metadata.
Consider putting the data in a Properties object and use its load()/store() serialization. That's a text-based technique so it's still readable in the database:
public String getFieldsAsString() {
Properties data = new Properties();
data.setProperty( "foo", this.getFoo() );
data.setProperty( "bar", this.getBar() );
...
ByteArrayOutputStream out = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
data.store( out, "" );
return new String( out.toByteArray(), "8859-1" ); //store() always uses this encoding
}
To load from string, do similar using a new Properties object and load() the data.
This is better than Java serialization because it's very readable and compact.
If you need support for different data types (i.e. not just String), use BeanUtils to convert each field to and from a string representation.
I'd say your initial approach is not all that bad if your POJO consists of Strings and primitive types. You could enforce escaping of the delimiter to prevent corruptions. Also if you use Hibernate you encapsulate the serialization in a custom type.
If you do not mind another dependency, Hessian is supposedly a more efficient way of serializing Java objects.
How about the standard JavaBeans persistence mechanism:
java.beans.XMLEncoder
java.beans.XMLDecoder
These are able to create Java POJOs from XML (which have been persisted to XML). From memory, it looks (something) like...
<object class="java.util.HashMap">
<void method="put">
<string>Hello</string>
<float>1</float>
</void>
</object>
You have to provide PersistenceDelegate classes so that it knows how to persist user-defined classes. Assuming you don't remove any public methods, it is resilient to schema changes.
You can optimize the serialization by externalizing your object. That will give you complete control over how it is serialized and improve the performance of process. This is simple to do, as long as your POJO is simple (i.e. doesn't have references to other objects), otherwise you can easily break serialization.
tutorial here
EDIT: Not implying this is the preferred approach, but you are very limited in your options if ti is performance critical and you can only use a string column in the table.
If you are using a delimiter you could use a character which you know would never occur in your text such as \0, or special symbols http://unicode.org/charts/symbols.html
However the time spent sending the data to the database and persisting it is likely to be much larger than the cost of serialization. So I would suggest starting with some thing simple and easy to read (like XStream) and look at where your application is spending most of its time and optimise that.
I have a certain POJO which needs to be persisted on a database, current design specifies its field as a single string column, and adding additional fields to the table is not an option.
Could you create a new table and put a foreign key into that column!?!? :)
I suspect not, but let's cover all the bases!
Serialization:
We've recently had this discussion so that if our application crashes we can resurrect it in the same state as previously. We essentially dispatch a persistance event onto a queue, and then this grabs the object, locks it, and then serializes it. This seems pretty quick. How much data are you serializing? Can you make any variables transient (i.e. cached variables)? Can you consider splitting up your serialization?
Beware: what happens if your objects change (locking) or classes change (diferent serialization id)? You'll need to upgrade everything that's serialized to latest classes. Perhaps you only need to store this overnight so it doesn't matter?
XML:
You could use something like xstream to achieve this. Building something custom is doable (a nice interview question!), but I'd probably not do it myself. Why bother? Remember if you have cyclic links or if you have referencs to objects more than once. Rebuilding the objects isn't quite so trivial.
Database storage:
If you're using Oracle 10g to store blobs, upgrade to the latest version, since c/blob performance is massively increased. If we're talking large amounts of data, then perhaps zip the output stream?
Is this a realtime app, or will there be a second or two pauses where you can safely persist the actual object? If you've got time, then you could clone it and then persist the clone on another thread. What's the persistance for? Is it critical it's done inside a transaction?
Consider changing your schema. Even if you find a quick way to serialize a POJO to a string how do you handle different versions? How do you migrate the database from X->Y? Or worse from A->D? I am seeing issues where we stored a serialize object into a BLOB field and have to migrate a customer across multiple versions.
Have you looked into JAXB? It is a mechanism by which you can define a suite of java objects that are created from an XML Schema. It allows you to marshal from an object hierarchy to XML or unmarshal the XML back into an object hierarchy.
I'll second suggestion to use JAXB, or possibly XStream (former is faster, latter has more focus on object serialization part).
Plus, I'll further suggest a decent JSON-based alternative, Jackson (http://jackson.codehaus.org/Tutorial), which can fully serializer/deserialize beans to JSON text to store in the column.
Oh and I absolutely agree in that do not use Java binary serialization under any circumstances for long-term data storage. Same goes for Protocol Buffers; both are too fragile for this purpose (they are better for data transfer between tigtly coupled systems).
You might try Preon. Preon aims to be to binary encoded data what Hibernate is to relational databases and JAXB to XML.
The log4j network adapter sends events as a serialised java object. I would like to be able to capture this object and deserialise it in a different language (python). Is this possible?
NOTE The network capturing is easy; its just a TCP socket and reading in a stream. The difficulty is the deserialising part
Generally, no.
The stream format for Java serialization is defined in this document, but you need access to the original class definitions (and a Java runtime to load them into) to turn the stream data back into something approaching the original objects. For example, classes may define writeObject() and readObject() methods to customise their own serialized form.
(edit: lubos hasko suggests having a little java program to deserialize the objects in front of Python, but the problem is that for this to work, your "little java program" needs to load the same versions of all the same classes that it might deserialize. Which is tricky if you're receiving log messages from one app, and really tricky if you're multiplexing more than one log stream. Either way, it's not going to be a little program any more. edit2: I could be wrong here, I don't know what gets serialized. If it's just log4j classes you should be fine. On the other hand, it's possible to log arbitrary exceptions, and if they get put in the stream as well my point stands.)
It would be much easier to customise the log4j network adapter and replace the raw serialization with some more easily-deserialized form (for example you could use XStream to turn the object into an XML representation)
Theoretically, it's possible. The Java Serialization, like pretty much everything in Javaland, is standardized. So, you could implement a deserializer according to that standard in Python. However, the Java Serialization format is not designed for cross-language use, the serialization format is closely tied to the way objects are represented inside the JVM. While implementing a JVM in Python is surely a fun exercise, it's probably not what you're looking for (-:
There are other (data) serialization formats that are specifically designed to be language agnostic. They usually work by stripping the data formats down to the bare minimum (number, string, sequence, dictionary and that's it) and thus requiring a bit of work on both ends to represent a rich object as a graph of dumb data structures (and vice versa).
Two examples are JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) and YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language).
ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One) is another data serialization format. Instead of dumbing the format down to a point where it can be easily understood, ASN.1 is self-describing, meaning all the information needed to decode a stream is encoded within the stream itself.
And, of course, XML (eXtensible Markup Language), will work too, provided that it is not just used to provide textual representation of a "memory dump" of a Java object, but an actual abstract, language-agnostic encoding.
So, to make a long story short: your best bet is to either try to coerce log4j into logging in one of the above-mentioned formats, replace log4j with something that does that or try to somehow intercept the objects before they are sent over the wire and convert them before leaving Javaland.
Libraries that implement JSON, YAML, ASN.1 and XML are available for both Java and Python (and pretty much every programming language known to man).
I would recommend moving to a third-party format (by creating your own log4j adapters etc) that both languages understand and can easily marshal / unmarshal, e.g. XML.
In theory it's possible. Now how difficult in practice it might be depends on whether Java serialization format is documented or not. I guess, it's not. edit: oops, I was wrong, thanks Charles.
Anyway, this is what I suggest you to do
capture from log4j & deserialize Java object in your own little Java program.
now when you have the object again, serialize it using your own custom formatter.
Tip: Maybe you don't even have to write your own custom formatter. for example, JSON (scroll down for libs) has libraries for Python and Java, so you could in theory use Java library to serialize your objects and Python equivalent library to deserialize it
send output stream to your python application and deserialize it
Charles wrote:
the problem is that for this
to work, your "little java program"
needs to load the same versions of all
the same classes that it might
deserialize. Which is tricky if you're
receiving log messages from one app,
and really tricky if you're
multiplexing more than one log stream.
Either way, it's not going to be a
little program any more.
Can't you just simply reference Java log4j libraries in your own java process? I'm just giving general advice here that is applicable to any pair of languages (name of the question is pretty language agnostic so I just provided one of the generic solutions). Anyway, I'm not familiar with log4j and don't know whether you can "inject" your own serializer into it. If you can, then of course your suggestion is much better and cleaner.
Well I am not Python expert so I can't comment on how to solve your problem but if you have program in .NET you may use IKVM.NET to deserialize Java objects easily. I have experimented this by creating .NET Client for Log4J log messages written to Socket appender and it worked really well.
I am sorry, if this answer does not make sense here.
If you can have a JVM on the receiving side and the class definitions for the serialized data, and you only want to use Python and no other language, then you may use Jython:
you would deserialize what you received using the correct Java methods
and then you process what you get with you Python code