We Keep Coding

Instantiating an undo method for two different moves

I was wondering if you could help me. I have a puzzle that needs to implement an undo method. There are two moves you can complete an assign move (assigns a number to the grid) and a relation move (which adds a relation move).
I have an abstract class (UserEntry) which instantiates one common method with Assign and RelEntry. I have called this public void addToPuzzle() {
it is as follows in the Assign Class:
#Override
public void addToPuzzle() {
Assign a = new Assign(row, col, num);
}
and this in the RelEntry Class:
#Override
public void addToPuzzle() {
RelEntry re = new RelEntry(greaterRow, greaterCol, lesserRow, lesserCol);
}
I am trying to create an undo method in my puzzle UI using a stack. I have tried this:
private void undo() {
if(stack.empty())
return;
stack.pop().addToPuzzle();
}
Moves are instantiated in the puzzle UI and I have pushed each move in the text UI into the stack using a stack.push line of code following each move being assigned. I have a feeling I'm not being clear, if this is the case, go easy on me as I'm new to Java.

Libgdx updating a label in a table

Having an issue with tables and updating a label! Here is the dilemma, I have a sell button in my game that is updating the player's coins whenever they sell an item, that part is working perfectly. The issue I am having is trying to get the coin value to update on the screen while there in this separate menu (see pic attached, coins in the top left). The problem is that the coin value is in another stage in another class. This is because I have different tables that pop up in the middle when I click the different buttons at the bottom. I have tried helper methods for going in and clearing that table and updating it and then sending me back to this item page but it is not working, I can post any code needed but this is more of a general question on how to update a label within a table in a stage.
Update: So to kinda sum up my question, I have a Screen and I have have three tables in it the bottom table the top left and the top right. Then I add the table to the stage in the middle when they press the inventory or shop button etc. What I am looking to do is to keep the item page open and simply just update the value of the Coin label, I know I can change the text using .setText(); Im just not sure how I can update that portion of the screen etc..
Update 2: If I just set the screen back to a new screen of this screen it updates the coin value but then I am not on the item page anymore which is not ideal.
Update 3: Thanks for the help so far guys, #John your answer is super helpful aswell. Im still not getting this working though here is a little bit of the code where the label is being handled.
playerCoinLabel = new Label(playerSave.getCoinsString(),skin,"defaultMiddle");
This is where it is getting added to the table.
tableLeft = new Table(skin);
stage.addActor(tableLeft);
tableLeft.setBounds(0,0, Gdx.graphics.getWidth(), Gdx.graphics.getHeight());
tableLeft.setFillParent(true);
tableLeft.top().left();
tableLeft.add(healthNonButton).size(84,80).left().padLeft(10).padTop(5);
tableLeft.add(playerHealthLabel).left().padLeft(15);
tableLeft.row();
tableLeft.add(levelNonButton).size(74,70).center().padLeft(10);
tableLeft.add(playerLevelLabel).left().padLeft(19);
tableLeft.row();
tableLeft.add(coinNonButton).size(74,70).center().padLeft(10);
tableLeft.add(this.playerCoinLabel).left().padLeft(15); //This line
tableLeft.row();
Then I have this method for updating my label using the setText like you guys were telling me about.
public void updatePlayerCoins() {
playerCoinLabel.setText(playerSave.getCoinsString());
}
and if I call this method anywhere, render() or where im setting the new coin value it is not updating/changing the label in the top left of my screen. I can post all the code to a github if I need to just posted the things involving the label. This is just a project im working on to increase my skill set so sorry if I sound amateur, it is because I am!
Thanks everyone!

It seems like you're asking two things- how do I update a label? and How do I structure my code? It's hard to tell what's going wrong with the former since we can't see your code, but #Tenfour04 is right- you want to retain a reference to the label somewhere and call setText() when you want to change the amount.
As far as structuring your code, I would suggest a simple OOP design and then evolve it like so:
First, we need an object to represent the player:
class Player {
private int coins; // Pretend there are getters / setters.
private int health;
private int level;
}
Now you probably have more than one way that you want to represent this player information, so we'll split the rendering code into a separate class or set of classes:
class StatWidget {
private Stage stage;
private Player player;
private Label lblCoins;
public StatWidget(Player player) { // Pseudo-code
this.player = player;
this.stage = new Stage();
Table tbl = new Table();
this.lblCoins = new Label(); // Notice we keep a reference to the label
tbl.add( this.coins );
}
public void update() {
lblCoins.setText(player.getCoins());
}
}
Now you can sync the UI with your player object's state simply by calling Player#update(). But when do you call it?
You could call update() in your render method. This is a little inefficient because you're updating the object whether it needs to be updated or not, but it's dead simple, and if you're only updating a few UI elements this way it probably doesn't matter. Personally, I'd stop here.
If you want to be more precise, you would only call update() when you actually make a change to the Player's coins. You can do this by finding the places in your code where you set the player's coins and add the update call like so:
player.setCoins( A_LOT_OF_MONEY );
statWidget.update();
Problem is this gets more cumbersome as you add more widgets- all your game logic now has to know about StatWidget and make calls to it. We could cut this dependency a little bit by using an event-driven architecture. Essentially, whenever player's state changes, it would send an event to interested parties notifying them of the change. You could use the pseudo-code below:
interface Publisher {
void subscribe(Subscriber subby);
void unsubscribe(Subscriber subby);
}
class Player implements Publisher {
private List<Subscriber> subscribers;
private int coins;
// ...
public void setCoins(int amount) {
this.coins = amount;
for(Subscriber subscriber : subscribers) subscriber.notify("COINS", amount);
}
public void subscribe(Subscriber subby) {
this.subscribers.add(subby);
}
public void unsubscribe(Subscriber subby) {
this.subscribers.remove(subby);
}
}
interface Subscriber {
void notify(String event, int qty);
void dispose();
}
class StatWidget implements Subscriber {
private Publisher player;
private Label label;
// ...
public StatWidget(Player player) {
this.player = player;
this.player.addSubscriber(this);
void notify(String event, int qty) {
if(event.equals("COINS")) label.setText(qty);
}
void dispose() {
this.player.unsubscribe(this);
}
}
The event system above could certainly be polished, and you could likely do clever things with generics (or use a library that has thought all this out for your), but hopefully it illustrates the concepts.

Java: Accessing resources and the Law Of Demeter

Overview
In my (Android) Java game, I have a class called resources. As the name suggests, this class holds the resources for the game. All of my OpenGL objects (Sprites) are created here
It's looks something like the following (obviously, this is a simplified version compared to that which appears in the real project):
public class Resources {
Hero hero;
Enemy enemy;
MenuButtons mainMenuButtons;
Background background;
Scene mainMenu;
public void createObjects(){
hero = new Hero();
enemy = new Enemy();
mainMenuButtons = new MenuButtons();
background = new Background();
mainMenu = new Scene(this);
}
}
So, within my mainMenu scene, I need access my objects, so we may see something like this:
public class mainMenu implements Scene {
Resources resources;
public mainMenu(Resources resources){
this.resources = resources;
}
#Override
public void render(){
resources.background.draw();
resources.hero.draw();
resources.enemy.draw();
mainMenuButtons.draw();
}
#Override
public void updateLogic(){
resources.hero.move();
resources.enemy.move();
resources.mainMenubuttons.animate();
}
}
Now, the above method is just one way to get access to the objects in resources and their methods. But does this actually break the Law of Demeter? If not, why not? If so, what is the best way to get access to these objects in a way that does not violate the LOD?
Accessors?
One option (which I've ruled out TBH - see below) is placing accessor methods into my resources class. So that I could do something like:
resources.drawBackround();
I have a lot of objects and I need an accessor for each method/variable of each object. Not really practical, it seems like I'm writing a ton of extra code and most importantly, it makes the resources class ridiculously long as it becomes filled with these accessors. Therefore, I'm not going down this road.
Passing in objects into the scene's constructor
Of course, I can also do something like this:
hero = new Hero();
enemy = new Enemy();
mainMenuButtons = new MenuButtons();
background = new Background();
mainMenu = new Scene(hero, enemy, mainMenuButtons, background);
So I can simply do this:
background.draw(); //etc....
This is workable for simple scene's (such as menu systems that don't require a lot of objects) but for the main game, it could quickly become a mess as I'd have to pass references to some 30+ objects into the constructor which doesn't really sound quite right......
So I would really appreciate if someone could point out the best way to proceed and why.

So I would really appreciate if someone could point out the best way to proceed and why.
The best way, in my opinion, is to keep the Resources class, make all objects private to not break the law and write accessors (but not for every object like you already ruled out).
I have a lot of objects and I need an accessor for each method/variable of each object. Not really practical, it seems like I'm writing a ton of extra code and most importantly, it makes the resources class ridiculously long as it becomes filled with these accessors. Therefore, I'm not going down this road.
I assume many objects are of the same class. So you do not have to make an accessor for every object what would really blow up the class.
I a game you normally have a hero, one or more enemies and many sprites.
public class Resources {
private Hero hero;
private Enemy enemy;
private MenuButtons mainMenuButtons;
private Background background;
private Scene mainMenu;
public void createObjects(){
hero = new Hero();
enemy = new Enemy();
mainMenuButtons = new MenuButtons();
background = new Background();
mainMenu = new Scene(this);
}
public Hero getBackground() {
return background;
}
public Hero getHero() {
return hero;
}
public List<Enemy> getEnemies() {
ArrayList<Enemy> list = new ArrayList<Enemy>();
list.add(enemy);
list.add(next_enemy);
return list;
}
public List<Sprite> getSprites() {
ArrayList<Sprite> list = new ArrayList<Sprite>();
list.addAll(enemy.getActiveSprites());
return list;
}
}
Instead of getHero() and getEnemy() you could also make a getActor() method if Hero and Enemy are derived from the same class.
The getSprites() method is just an example how it could look like.
If that solution is not going to work for you, I have another suggestion.
Make the Resources class do some work.
public class ResourceManager {
private Hero hero;
private Enemy enemy;
private MenuButtons mainMenuButtons;
private Background background;
private Scene mainMenu;
public void createObjects(){
hero = new Hero();
enemy = new Enemy();
mainMenuButtons = new MenuButtons();
background = new Background();
mainMenu = new Scene(this);
}
public void render(Scene scene) {
this.background.draw();
if (scene != mainMenu) {
this.hero.draw();
this.enemy.draw();
}
this.mainMenuButtons.draw();
}
public void updateLogic(Scene scene){
this.hero.move();
this.enemy.move();
this.mainMenubuttons.animate();
}
}
The mainMenu then calls logic methods directly in the RescourceManager class.
public class mainMenu implements Scene {
ResourceManager resourceManager;
public mainMenu(ResourceManager resourceManager){
this.resourceManager = resourceManager;
}
#Override
public void render(){
resourceManager.render(this);
}
#Override
public void updateLogic(){
resourceManager.updateLogic(this);
}
}
I hope my suggestions helped you a bit figure out how to continue with your project.

You could use dependency injection and eliminate your Resources class. Then you can call functions on your fields and wouldn't be in violation of the Law of Demeter.
Here is an example using constructor injection:
public class MainMenu implements Scene {
Background background;
Hero hero;
Enemy enemy;
MenuButtons buttons
public mainMenu(Background background, Hero hero, Enemy enemy, MenuButtons buttons){
this.background = background;
this.hero = hero;
this.enemy = enemy;
this.buttons = buttons;
}
#Override
public void render(){
this.background.draw();
this.hero.draw();
this.enemy.draw();
this.mainMenuButtons.draw();
}
#Override
public void updateLogic(){
this.hero.move();
this.enemy.move();
this.mainMenubuttons.animate();
}
}
With dependency injection, you pass instances into constructors and functions instead of "newing" them inside your class. You need to manage your instances somewhere though, and there are plenty of libraries that will do that for you. Dagger is a popular one for Android: http://square.github.io/dagger/

The idea of passing a list isn't a bad first step, but it's not sufficient. Game developers have a (somewhat controversial) concept of a structure called a "scene graph" that helps them keep track of their resources (among other things). https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Scene_graph
It's a pretty complicated concept, but you're going to need to learn about it sooner or later. There's a lot of good advice on gamedev.stackexchange.com, so I'd suggest you take a peek over there.
Here's a nice YouTube video tutorial on the subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktz9AlMSEoA

You could create an Drawer class that handles the drawing of all the objects. Your scene objects simply need to feed the Drawer the objects that I assume are Drawable.
public class Drawer {
public void drawObjects(Drawable... objects) {
for(Drawable drawable : objects) {
drawable.draw();
}
}
}
This is then used by Scene to draw those objects.
public class mainMenu implements Scene {
Resources resources;
Drawer drawer;
...
public void render() {
drawer.drawObjects(resources.background,
resources.hero,
resources.enemy,
resources.mainMenuButtons);
}
...
}
A similar strategy, using an Updater, can applied for the other methods. If your updateLogic() method makes as simple of calls as it looks, you can definitely do the same thing, by making all those objects inherit from an Updateable interface.
public interface Updateable {
void update();
}
Hero's and Enemy's update() methods could simply call their move() methods, while MenuButtons's update() could delegate to animate(), etc.
Obviously, if you like, you can use some sort of collection instead of varargs for the parameter of Drawer's drawObjects(). I just like the nice fluency made possible by the varargs, since you don't have to create the collection.
For other tips for keeping code in line with the Law of Demeter, check out this article: Law of Demeter and How to Work With It

I like the concept of a ResourceManager. But a ResourceManager should be responsilbe for loading Resources, caching and freeing them. Rendering is definitly a Method of a Render Object.
So the Scence - render Method could delegate the rendering to it after instantiating a Renderer and feed it with Drawables as the Renderer does not render Resources but renderable objects.
Say:
class MainMenu implements Scene {
Renderer sceneRenderer = new Renderer();
AnimatedRenderer animatedRenderer = new AnimatedRenderer();
ResourceManager resourceManager = ResourceManager.getInstance();
List<Resource> resources;
List<Drawable> renderedObjects;
GameObjectController gameObjectController;
void initializeScene() {
resources = resourceManager.getResources();
renderedObjects = resourcesAsRenderables();
sceneRenderer.setDrawables(renderedObjects);
}
List<Drawable> resourcesAsRenderables() {
// if resources are not directly renderable, do decoration etc
// and return a List of Drawable
}
#Override
public void render(){
sceneRenderer.render();
}
#Override
public void updateLogic(){
moveGameObjects();
doAnimations();
}
protected void moveGameObjects() {
gameObjectController.moveAllObjects(this, resources);
}
protected void doAnimations() {
animatedRenderer.render(resources);
}
class ResourceManager {
private static ResourceManager instance = null;
List<Resource> resources;
public ResourceManager getInstance() {
if(instance == null) {
instance = new ResourceManager();
instance.loadResources();
}
return instance;
}
private void loadResources() {
resources = new LinkedList<Resource>();
resources.add(new Hero());
....
}
public List<Resource> getResources() {
return resources;
}
}
This clearly separates the logic and responsibilities for the tasks carried out during the scene lifecycle. A resource manager which is responsible for retrieving resources and as they may take long loading times does things like caching or freeing in low memory situations hiding the details from the client. A renderer which is responsible for displaying the objects and a controller which is responsible for moving the objects. The controller itself may implement handlers for keyboard events but that is not something which must be transparent to the scene. The renderer may swap backgrounds in or out or scale or set lighting effects but the scene only calls its render method. The animated renderer is responsible for starting , rendering and stopping animations.

Change this:
public void render(){
resources.background.draw();
resources.hero.draw();
resources.enemy.draw();
mainMenuButtons.draw();
}
#Override
public void updateLogic(){
resources.hero.move();
resources.enemy.move();
resources.mainMenubuttons.animate();
}
With this:
public void render(){
resources.render();
}
#Override
public void updateLogic(){
resources.update();
}
ResourceManager don't have to know what's inside Resources. It may be one enemy or ten, it doesn't care to ResourceManager.
And so in 'Resource' you can do:
public void update(){
hero.update();// Cause hero may, or may not move, he makes the choice
enemy.update();//...
mainMenubuttons.update();//.
}
public void render(){
...
}
More than this! you could change the "Resource" implementation with an interface and you will be programming for interfaces and not for implementations, which is cool! This way you can have a 'Resources' for in-game and another one for menus that will be used in same way: Only changing, at runtime, the concrete Resources you will be in a menu or in game!
Anyway, not always is needed to fill Demeter.

As can be seen your Resources dont need to be recreated, instead they do use some resources that cant be reloaded (probably images).
You should share the images object within a Resource class, and create your objects within a Scene class, on the constructor of the entities you can get the shared resource that is pre-loaded.

Managing Scene2d, libgdx

I'm making a simple point&click game using libGdx and their Scene2d. Now, when I enter a location my Stage is cleared and new Actors are beeing attached. It doesnt feel right and its not efficient.
Can I make all Actors at the begining (except backgrounds, I will load them when entering a location), add them to Stage and associate them with locations, so the Stage would know witch to draw?
My only idea was to check that in draw and act methods of every actor, but that would mean houndreds of checks in a loop. Maybe Scene2d got something to help me out? Or maybe there is another way to do it?

My only idea was to check that in draw and act methods of every actor, but that would mean houndreds of checks in a loop.
Yes, that will be inneficient, and above all, a hell to maintain.
Now, when I enter a location my Stage is cleared and new Actors are beeing attached.
This is where your problem is, you're not using scene2D as it should be IMHO. I hope you're up for an intense architecture & code refactoring session.
When entering a new location, you should be entering a new stage.
So first, you should have several stages :
class MainMenu extends Stage {
public MainMenu(){
// Add buttons to play or quit the game
}
}
class PointNClickStage extends Stage {
// Add stuff common to all point'n click stages such as an inventory display
}
class Island extends PointNClickStage {
public Island (){
// Add some palm trees and an hidden chest
}
}
class PirateShip extends PointNClickStage {
public PirateShip(){
// Add some pirates and their ship
}
}
... etc
Then in your application listener, you should implement a way to change the current stage being rendered. Conceptually, this is often called a "scene/stage director". Some scene-based frameworks, such as Cocos2D provides their own scene director, but libgdx doesn't currently. So, you have to implement this mechanism by yourself and here is a very basic example to help you get the gist of it :
public MyApp extends ApplicationAdapter {
private Stage currentStage;
private static MyApp instance;
// ...
#Override
public void create () {
instance = this;
MyApp.setStage(new MainMenu()); // The game begins in the main menu
}
#Override
public void render () {
Gdx.gl.glClearColor(0.15f, 0.1f, 0.15f, 1);
Gdx.gl.glClear(GL20.GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT);
currentStage.act();
currentStage.draw();
}
public static void setStage(Stage stage){
instance.currentStage = stage;
Gdx.input.setInputProcessor(stage); // Important ;)
}
// ...
}
So that to change the location (current stage) you will only have to do :
MyApp.setStage(new PirateShip())
Then, if you don't want to recreate a new stage every time you change your location, you may initialize and keep a reference on them somewhere so that you will be able to change the location like that for example.
MyApp.setStage(some_list_containing_initialized_stage.get(id))
Alternatively, you may also look into this libgdx extension that provides scene2d utils classes such as a scene director, and transitions that may be useful for you if you don't want to reinvent the wheel later.

Invoking methods of a class that instantiated this one

I'm developing a game in Java which uses the Lightweight Java Game Library (LWJGL) with OpenGL.
I encountered the following problem.
I want to create an ArrayList of all textures in an object in the main loop, and access these from objects instantiated in this main object. A simplified example:
game.class:
public class Game {
ArrayList Textures; // to hold the Texture object I created
Player player; // create Player object
public Game() {
new ResourceLoader(); // Here is the instance of the ResourceLoader class
player = new Player(StartingPosition) // And an instance of the playey, there are many more arguments I give it, but none of this matter (or so I hope)
while(true) { // main loop
// input handlers
player.draw() // here I call the player charcter to be drawn
}
}
// this method SHOULD allow the resource loader to add new textures
public void addTextures (Texture tx) {
Textures.add(tx);
}
}
ResourceLoader.class
public class ResourceLoader {
public ResourceLoader() {
Interface.this.addTexture(new Texture("image.png")); // this is the line I need help with
}
}
Player.class
public class Player {
public player() {
// some stuff, including assignment of appropriate textureID
}
public void draw() {
Interface.this.Textures.get(this.textureID).bind(); // this also doesn't work
// OpenGL method to draw the character
}
}
In my real code the ResourceLoader class has about 20 textures to load.
There is a total of over 400 entities in the game that have a draw method just like Player.class and most of them share the same texture; e.g. there are about 150-180 wall object all showing the same image of bricks.
The Game object is not the main class and it does not have the static void main() method, but it is one of the only few things instantiated in the main() method of the game.
Also, in the past, I worked around the problem by letting each entity load its own texture file. But as I increased the complexity and map size, it becomes very inefficient to load the same image hundreds of times.
I arrived at the state of the code above from this answer.
I believe I would have to put ResourceLoader.class and Player.class inside the game.class, which would not be a good solution considering that there are about 20 files that need this treatment and most of them are 200+ lines long.
I think my Texture object as well as initialization of OpenGL and other stuff are pretty generic and should not impact the issue in question. I can provide these if necessary.

Make the "outer" class instance a parameter to the constructors:
public class Player {
final Interface obj;
public player(Interface obj) {
this.obj = obj;
// some stuff, including assignment of appropriate textureID
}
public void draw() {
obj.Textures.get(this.textureID).bind();
}
}
public class ResourceLoader {
public ResourceLoader(Interface obj) {
obj.addTexture(new Texture("image.png"));
}
}
And instantiate those in Game like:
new Player(this);
Note: The example lines used Interface but Game does not implement it. I assume that's an artifact of code cleaned for the posting. Just use the type that is appropriate for your situation.