We Keep Coding

Weblogic 14c - webservice-description-name is not unique within weblogic-webservices

I am exposing my stateless ejb as web service using the annotations as follows:
#WebService(
name = "MyServicePort",
portName = "MyServicePort",
serviceName = "MyService",
)
#SOAPBinding(
style = SOAPBinding.Style.RPC
)
#Stateless(mappedName="MyServiceEJB", name = "MyServiceEJB")
public class MyServiceBean {
To define the context root in weblogic, I've defined the web service in weblogic-webservices.xml deployment descriptor as follows:
<weblogic-webservices
xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-webservices"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-webservices http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-webservices/1.1/weblogic-webservices.xsd">
<webservice-description>
<webservice-description-name>MyService</webservice-description-name>
<port-component>
<port-component-name>MyServicePort</port-component-name>
<service-endpoint-address>
<webservice-contextpath>/mycontext</webservice-contextpath>
<webservice-serviceuri>/myservice</webservice-serviceuri>
</service-endpoint-address>
</port-component>
</webservice-description>
</weblogic-webservices>
However, weblogic is throwing the below error while deploying:
[ERROR] weblogic.wsee.ws.WsException: Error encountered while deploying WebService module 'myservice-ejb.jar'.
In weblogic-webservices.xml, webservice-description-name MyService is not unique within weblogic-webservices
Any clue what I am doing wrong here? This is the only bean/service in my web application and there is no other application deployed in weblogic (local instance).

I am able to resolve the issue by placing the webservices.xml with below contents into META-INF folder (next to weblogic-webservices.xml).
<webservices xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/javaee_web_services_1_4.xsd"
version="1.4">
<display-name>MyService</display-name>
<webservice-description>
<webservice-description-name>MyService</webservice-description-name>
<port-component>
<port-component-name>MyServicePort</port-component-name>
<wsdl-port xmlns:tns="http://schemas.mycompany.com/webservices/MyService">tns:MyServicePort</wsdl-port>
<service-endpoint-interface>mypackage.MyServiceBean</service-endpoint-interface>
<service-impl-bean>
<ejb-link>MyServiceEJB</ejb-link>
</service-impl-bean>
</port-component>
</webservice-description>
</webservices>
Hope it may help someone facing the same challenge.

#Resource annotation doesn't work in Tomact 10.0.10

Recently I tried Tomcat 10.0.10 and when trying to inject the connection pool as a JNDI resource find out that the #Resource annotation doesn't work.
Then I tried obtain it programmatically by creating a InitialContext and it worked. Initially I thought it was only for the java:comp/env/jdbc so I tried with a simple bean like below and tried to inject it with the #Resource annotation it didn't work again. When I try to obtain it programmatically by creating a InitialContext and it works. Then I check whether the #PostConstruct or #PreDestroy annotation works and found out that they also don't work.
package lk.ijse.test.tomcatdbcp;
public class Something {
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Context>
<Resource name="bean/Something" auth="Container"
type="lk.ijse.test.tomcatdbcp.Something"
factory="org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory"
/>
</Context>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app metadata-complete="false" xmlns="https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee/web-app_5_0.xsd"
version="5.0">
<resource-env-ref>
<resource-env-ref-name>bean/Something</resource-env-ref-name>
<resource-env-ref-type>lk.ijse.test.tomcatdbcp.Something</resource-env-ref-type>
</resource-env-ref>
</web-app>
package lk.ijse.test.tomcatdbcp;
import java.io.*;
import jakarta.annotation.PostConstruct;
import jakarta.annotation.Resource;
import jakarta.servlet.http.*;
import jakarta.servlet.annotation.*;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import javax.naming.NamingException;
#WebServlet(name = "helloServlet", value = "/hello", loadOnStartup = 1)
public class HelloServlet extends HttpServlet {
private String message;
#Resource(name= "java:comp/env/bean/Something")
private Something something;
#PostConstruct
public void doSomething(){
System.out.println("Does it work?");
}
public void init() {
message = "Hello World!";
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
Something lookup = (Something) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/bean/Something");
System.out.println(lookup);
System.out.println(something); // null
} catch (NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
response.setContentType("text/html");
// Hello
PrintWriter out = response.getWriter();
out.println("<html><body>");
out.println("<h1>" + message + "</h1>");
out.println("</body></html>");
}
public void destroy() {
}
}
To reproduce the same issue, I created a sample repo here: https://github.com/sura-boy-playground/play-with-tomcat10
(Complete code can be found there)
At first, I had used javax.annotation.Resource annotation, so I thought that was the reason because of the javax.* to jakarta.* namespace change. Then I tried it with jakarta.annotation.Resource but the result was same.
I tried the same application with Tomcat 9.0.41 plus javax.* namespace, it works perfectly.
Is there any extra stuff that I need to do on Tomcat 10.0.10 to enable these annotations? I dug the Tomcat 10 documentation but I wasn't able to find out any thing related to my issue.
I found out that there was a similar case in Tomcat 7 previously, but I don't like that kind of workaround now.
Tomcat #Resource annotations API annotation stops working in Tomcat 7

You should declare the scope of your jakarta.annotation dependency as provided:
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.annotation</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.annotation-api</artifactId>
<version>2.0.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
If you have two copies of jakarta.annotation.Resource (one in the common classloader and one in your application's classloader), the two classes are different. The InstanceManager will look for fields annotated with the common classloader's copy of #Resource, while the something field is annotated with your webapp's copy of #Resource.
Edit: this problem was fixed in Tomcat 10.0.17 (cf. changelog), 9.0.59 and 10.1.0-M11.
Remark: You will have the same problem in Tomcat 9.0 if you use Java 11 or later. Before Java 11 the javax.annotation.* classes where included in the JRE. Servlet containers are required to look in the bootstrap/JRE classloader before looking in the webapp classloader (overriding javax.* classes is a breach of Java's licence), therefore Tomcat would never find the additional copy of the classes.

java.lang.ClassCastException,Getting Entitymanager Via JNDI Lookup

I am new to JPA and developing a webapp(J2EE) where the webapp is in Tomcat so I can't use #PersistenceContext. I decided to use a Helper class and everything was going fine. Then I decided to implement JNDI for connection pooling and I managed to get Datasource.
The Helper Class looks like the following:
try {
Context initCtx = new InitialContext();
entityManager = //class cast exception
(EntityManager)initCtx.lookup(
"java:/comp/env/jdbc/LCDS"
);
DataSource ds= (DataSource)initCtx.lookup(
"java:/comp/env/jdbc/LCDS"
);
System.out.println(ds.getConnection()+"Cool");
//jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/XXXXXXX, UserName=root#localhost, MySQL-AB JDBC DriverCool
emf=(EntityManagerFactory) source.getConnection(); //class cast exception
emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("XXXX"); //working version
}
The error is:
ava.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSource cannot be cast to javax.persistence.EntityManager
I don't know where I am getting wrong. I am not able to get EntityManagerFactory or EntityManager via JNDI lookup. I tried #Resource(name="jdbc/LCDS") and #PersistenceUnit(name="jdbc/LCDS").

To use a JNDI datasource in JPA, this should be specified in the persistence.xml, something like:
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd" version="2">
<persistence-unit name="..." transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<non-jta-data-source>java:/comp/env/jdbc/LCDS</non-jta-data-source>
...
Then you just have to create your EntityManagerFactory via Persistence#createEntityManagerFactory(String). If you want to recycle the EntityManagerFactory, this should be done outside of JNDI (e.g. as a ServletContext attribute). This is because Tomcat is not a Java EE server, only a servlet container: he is not able to inject the persistence unit.

UPDATE
JNDI access to persistence unit is not possible due to Tomcat limitations. See JPA Tomcat limitations. You will have to use emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("UNIT NAME").
Sorry for misleading answer. I've tested that on WebSphere Liberty, didn't have Tomcat at hand.
If you need that functionality check WebSphere Liberty, which is as fast and lightweight as Tomcat, but is fully Java EE Web profile compliant. It has lots of useful features like JPA, EJBLite, JAX-RS already available if needed, without fighting with additional libraries configuration.
UPDATE END
I've checked on WebSphere Liberty, you need to create reference to lookup your persistence unit via JNDI. You have two options to create that:
Use annotation at the class level
In any of your servlets you need to define annotation using the follownig:
#PersistenceUnit(name="JPATestRef", unitName="UnitName")
public class JPATester extends HttpServlet {
...
Use entry in web.xml
<persistence-unit-ref>
<persistence-unit-ref-name>JPATestRef</persistence-unit-ref-name>
<persistence-unit-name>UnitName</persistence-unit-name>
</persistence-unit-ref>
Then you access it using the following code:
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
System.out.println("looking EntityManagerFactory:");
EntityManagerFactory emf2 = (EntityManagerFactory) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/JPATestRef");
System.out.println("emf:2" + emf2);
} catch (NamingException e) {

Context is read only

Helo masters, I have to create a JNDI Datasource dynamically, I tried to do it with a listener called SetupApplicationListener. Here is the beginning of WEB-LIB/web.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app version="2.4" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee">
<display-name>pri-web</display-name>
<!-- Listeners -->
<listener>
<listener-class>org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener</listener-class>
</listener>
<listener>
<listener-class>myapp.SetupApplicationListener</listener-class>
</listener>
The code of the listener:
public class SetupApplicationListener implements ServletContextListener {
public static Log LOG = null;
public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent ctx){
try {
createOracleDataSource();
.....
}
}
private void createOracleDataSource() throws SQLException, NamingException {
OracleDataSource ds = new OracleDataSource();
ds.setDriverType(...);
ds.setServerName(...);
ds.setPortNumber(...);
ds.setDatabaseName(...);
ds.setUser(...);
ds.setPassword(...);
new InitialContext().bind("java:comp/env/jdbc/myDS", ds);
}
.....
}
And there is the error:
[ERROR] 29/01/2013 09:44:50,517 (SetupApplicationListener.java:86) -> Error
javax.naming.NamingException: Context is read only
at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.checkWritable(NamingContext.java:903)
at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.bind(NamingContext.java:831)
at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.bind(NamingContext.java:171)
at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.bind(NamingContext.java:187)
at org.apache.naming.SelectorContext.bind(SelectorContext.java:186)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.bind(InitialContext.java:359)
at myapp.SetupApplicationListener.createOracleDataSource(SetupApplicationListener.java:102)
Can I set the read-only properties of the Context to "true"? Thanks! :)
Tomcat 6.0
Oracle 11g
jdk1.5
EDIT: Don't need to be dynamically, i have to define a jndi datasource internally I can't modify the server files because it is a shared server. It must be jndi because other modules use it in that way, thanks.

If you need to create a datasource dynamically is there really any need for a JNDI lookup? JNDI is designed to make the connection external to the application, while in your scenario its tightly coupled to the application due to a legitimate requirement. Why not just use a JDBC connection?

You need to create a ServletContextListener and there you can make the InitialContext writable - it's not the way it should be done, but if you really need it, this is one way you can do it.
This also works with Java Melody!
protected void makeJNDIContextWritable(ServletContextEvent sce) {
try {
Class<?> contextAccessControllerClass = sce.getClass().getClassLoader().loadClass("org.apache.naming.ContextAccessController");
Field readOnlyContextsField = contextAccessControllerClass.getDeclaredField("readOnlyContexts");
readOnlyContextsField.setAccessible(true);
Hashtable readOnlyContexts = (Hashtable) readOnlyContextsField.get(null);
String context = null;
for (Object key : readOnlyContexts.keySet()) {
String keyString = key + "";
if (keyString.endsWith(sce.getServletContext().getContextPath())) {
context = keyString;
}
}
readOnlyContexts.remove(context);
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}

I haven't got this problem before since I usually defined JNDI in application server(tomcat, weblogic and etc). Just like what Kevin said, this is exactly what JNDI was designed for; separating datasource config from your source code and retrieving JNDI resources through lookup and inject;
Back to your question, I think tomcat has every strict rules on modifying JNDI at runtime. In another word, you cannot re-bind or remove jndi from Context. If you go through the tomcat specification you will probably see some thing about jndi lookup but no re-bind.

From section EE.5.3.4 of the EE 6 platform specification (JSR 316):
The container must ensure that the application component instances
have only read access to their naming context. The container must
throw the javax.naming.OperationNotSupportedException from all the
methods of the javax.naming.Context interface that modify the
environment naming context and its subcontexts.
Note that "their naming context" in this section is referring to java:comp.

I solved this problem when found that I was closing environmentContext object
For example:
Context context=new InitialContext();
Context environmentContext=(Context) context.lookup("java:comp/env");
And my code was:
environmentContext.close();
After removing close function from environmentContext problem was solded for me;

I also had this problem, but being new to Tomee, I didn't know that there is a simple solution. When I deployed my web app to the webapps folder, the app worked fine, but when I deployed it to a service folder, I got the same abort. The problem was that the folder name did not match the war name (minus the .war). Once I fixed that, the app worked fine. Make sure the war name, folder name and service name are identical. This problem produces several different errors, including Context is read only and Error merging Java EE JNDI entries.

I solved this issue by setting useNaming="false" in my context.xml.
From the documentation:
useNaming : Set to true (the default) to have Catalina enable a JNDI InitialContext for this web application that is compatible with Java2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) platform conventions.

JNDI path Tomcat vs. Jboss

I have DataSource which is configured on Tomcat 6 in context.xml as MyDataSource.
And I'm fetching it the following way:
DataSource dataSource;
try {
dataSource = (DataSource) new InitialContext().lookup("java:comp/env/MyDataSource");
} catch (NamingException e) {
throw new DaoConfigurationException(
"DataSource '" + url + "' is missing in JNDI.", e);
}
Everything works fine. Now I'm exporting this code to Jboss AP 6. and I configured my dataSource and its connection pool as local-tx dataSource under the same name.
When I'm executing the code above, I'm getting NamingException exception. after some investigation I've found that correct way to call my DataSource under Jboss is
dataSource = (DataSource) new InitialContext().lookup("java:/MyDataSource");
Can anybody explain me why should I omit "comp/env" in my JNDI path under Jboss?

The portable approach for defining data sources is to use a resource reference. Resource references enable you to define the JNDI name for your data source, relative to your application naming context (java:comp/env), and then map that logical reference to the physical resource defined in the application server, whose JNDI name is proprietary to the application server vendor. This approach enables your code and assembly to be portable to any compliant application server.
Step 1: Declare and Lookup Resource Reference
Option 1
This can be done by declaring a resource-ref in your web deployment descriptor (WEB-INF/web.xml):
<resource-ref>
<description>My Data Source.</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/MyDataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
Within your code, you can then lookup this resource using the JNDI name java:comp/env/jdbc/MyDataSource:
dataSource = (DataSource) new InitialContext().lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/MyDataSource");
This JNDI name will not change regardless of the server where the application is deployed.
Option 2
Alternatively, starting in Java EE 5 (Servlet 2.5), this can be done even easier within your code using the #Resource annotation. This eliminates the need for configuring the resource-ref in your web deployment descriptor (web.xml) and prevents the need to perform an explicit JNDI lookup:
public class MyServlet extends HttpServlet {
#Resource(name = "jdbc/MyDataSource")
private DataSource dataSource;
#Override
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) throws ServletException, IOException {
// dataSource may be accessed directly here since the container will automatically
// inject an instance of the data source when the servlet is initialized
}
This approach has the same results as the previous option, but cuts down on the boilerplate code and configuration in your assembly.
Step 2: Map Resource Reference to Data Source
Then, you will need to use your application server's proprietary approach for mapping the resource reference to the physical data source that you created on the server, for example, using JBoss's custom deployment descriptors (WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jboss-web>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/MyDataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<jndi-name>java:/MyDataSource</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</jboss-web>
Or, for example, using Tomcat's context.xml:
<Resource name="jdbc/MyDataSource" . . . />

You can add to your data source definition the 'jndi-name' tag:
jndi-name - the JNDI name under which the DataSource should be bound.
You can find data source documentation on JBoss wiki: ConfigDataSources