I have a plain hashmap with numeric values and would like to retrieve its content, ideally in a list (but that can be worked out).
Can it be done?
Try this:
library(rJava)
.jinit()
# create a hash map
hm<-.jnew("java/util/HashMap")
# using jrcall instead of jcall, since jrcall uses reflection to get types
.jrcall(hm,"put","one", "1")
.jrcall(hm,"put","two","2")
.jrcall(hm,"put","three", "3")
# convert to R list
keySet<-.jrcall(hm,"keySet")
an_iter<-.jrcall(keySet,"iterator")
aList <- list()
while(.jrcall(an_iter,"hasNext")){
key <- .jrcall(an_iter,"next");
aList[[key]] <- .jrcall(hm,"get",key)
}
Note that using .jrcall is less efficient than .jcall. But for the life of me I can not get the method signature right with .jcall. I wonder if it has something to do with the lack of generics.
I have never done this myself, but there is an example in the rJava documentation of creating and working with a HashMap using the with function:
HashMap <- J("java.util.HashMap")
with( HashMap, new( SimpleEntry, "key", "value" ) )
with( HashMap, SimpleEntry )
Related
Currently, that's my code:
Iterable<Practitioner> referencedPractitioners = this.practitionerRepository.findAllById(
Optional.ofNullable(patient.getPractitioners())
.map(List::stream)
.orElse(Stream.of())
.map(Reference::getIdPart)
.collect(Collectors.toList())
);
As you can see, I'm using this.practitionerRepository.findAllById(Iterable<String> ids), in order to get all using a single communication with database.
I was trying to change it using this:
Optional.ofNullable(patient)
.map(org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.Patient::getPractitioners)
.map(List::stream)
.orElse(Stream.of())
.map(Reference::getIdPart)
.collect(????????);
How could I use this.practitionerRepository.findAllById(Iterable<String> ids) into a custom collector in collect method?
Remember I need to get all entities at once. I can't get them one by one.
You can use Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collector<T,A,R> downstream, Function<R,RR> finisher) specialized collector for that.
Make a list of IDs using the Collector.toList() collector and then
Pass a reference practitionerRepository::findAllById to convert from List<String> to Iterable<Practitioner>
Example:
Iterable<Practitioner> referencedPractitioners = Optional.ofNullable(patient)
.map(Patient::getPractitioners)
.map(List::stream)
.orElseGet(Stream::of)
.map(Reference::getIdPart)
.collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(toList(), practitionerRepository::findAllById));
am using RethinkDB with java driver and i want to get rows by list of id's
until now i used :
.filter(row -> row.g("_id").eq("one")
but if i want to search where _id is equal to ["one","two", ...] (list of items)
iv seen an examples on how to do it in javascript and found this :-
r.db("test2").table("table2").filter(
function (doc) {
return r.expr(["two","one"])
.contains(doc("_id"))
}
)
any idea how to do it with java driver
thank you
Something like this might work:
r.table("users").filter(
user -> r.expr(r.array("two", "one")).contains(user.g("_id"))
).run(conn);
The rethinkdb documentation has more examples that might help.
I have an aggregation:
AggregationResults<Integer> result = mongoTemplate.aggregate(
Aggregation.newAggregation(
Aggregation.group().count().as("value"),
Aggregation.project("value").andExclude("_id"),
MyData.class, Integer.class);
In the mongo shell, when I don't have to map an object, I get: { "value" : 2 }
However, I get the following error when trying to map this lone value: org.springframework.data.mapping.model.MappingException: No mapping metadata found for java.lang.Integer
Can I get around having to create a new output type class, when I only want to get a single java primitive?
Note: I'm going this approach instead of db.collection.count() for the sharding inaccuracies stated here - https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/method/db.collection.count/#sharded-clusters
AggregationResults<DBObject> result = mongoTemplate.aggregate(
Aggregation.newAggregation(
Aggregation.group().count().as("value"),
Aggregation.project("value").andExclude("_id"),
MyData.class, DBObject.class);
int count = (Integer) result.getUniqueMappedResult().get("value");
So, not exactly what I wanted, because I still have to traverse over an object, but it's not any more code than I had before and I didn't need to make another class as the outputType.
I'm trying to create a TreeMap which is capable of storing multiple beans(Row) mapped to one key. My current declaration of the TreeMap is :
Map<String, List<Row>> rowmap = new TreeMap<String, List<Row>>();
With this kind of declaration i can easily use this method to add :
rowmap.get(combinedKey).add(rowlst);
This was working well in my local machine. The problem due to some issue in the Live Tomcat server, I couldn't use the declaration mentioned above to declare the Map, it throws these errors :
Syntax error on token "<", ( expected
Syntax error, insert ")" to complete Expression
Syntax error on token "<", ( expected
Syntax error on token "(", invalid Expression
So I declared this way :
Map rowmap = new TreeMap();
this solves the previous error but i couldn't use rowmap.get(combinedKey).add(rowlst); to add multiple values to a key because .add is defined in List not TreeMap, from my understanding i need declare the TreeMap this way : Map<String, List<Row>> rowmap = new TreeMap<String, List<Row>>(); to be able to use rowmap.get(combinedKey).add(rowlst);.
It would be great if anyone could suggest a workaround to solve this problem. I'm open to all suggestion.Thanks a lot!
EDIT :
Tomcat version : 5.5.9
Java version : 1.6.0_41-b02
Instead of add method use put for Maps.
put(K key, V value) for example: rowmap.put(combinedKey,rowlst);
I am currently storing marshalling libraries for different client versions in a HashMap.
The libs are loaded using the org.reflections API. For simplicity sake I'll just insert a few values here by hand. They are unordered by intent, because I have no influence on in which order the map is initialized on start-up by the reflections API.
The keys (ClientVersion) are enums.
HashMap<ClientVersion, IMarshalLib> MAP = new HashMap<>();
MAP.put(ClientVersion.V100, new MarshalLib100());
MAP.put(ClientVersion.V110, new MarshalLib110());
MAP.put(ClientVersion.V102, new MarshalLib102());
MAP.put(ClientVersion.V101, new MarshalLib101());
MAP.put(ClientVersion.V150, new MarshalLib150());
All and well so far, the problem now is, that there are client versions out there where the marshalling did not change since the previous version.
Let's say, we have a client version ClientVersion.V140. In this particular case I am looking for MarshalLib110, assigned to ClientVersion.V110.
How would I get the desired result (without iterating through all entries and grabbing "the next lower" value each time)?
Thanks in advance!
How would I get the desired result (without iterating through all entries and grabbing "the next lower" value each time)
There is nothing you can do about "iterating through all entries" part: since the map is unordered, there is no way of finding the next smaller item without iterating the entire set of keys.
However, there is something you can do about the "each time" part: if you make a copy of this map into a TreeMap, you would be able to look up the next smaller item by calling the floorEntry method.
Another alternative is to copy the keys into an array on the side, sort the array, and run a binary search each time that you need to look up the next smaller key. With the key in hand, you can look up the entry in your hash map.
I recommend you to use NavigableSet. Look at this example:
HashMap<Integer, String> map = new HashMap<>();
map.put(100, "MarshalLib100");
map.put(110, "MarshalLib110");
map.put(102, "MarshalLib102");
map.put(101, "MarshalLib101");
map.put(150, "MarshalLib150");
NavigableSet<Integer> set = new TreeSet<>(map.keySet());
Integer key = set.lower(150); // ^ -> 110
String val = map.get(key); // ^ -> MarshalLib110
// or
key = set.higher(110);// ^ -> 150
val = map.get(key); // ^ -> MarshalLib150
Update: Using TreeMap to find next lower key is not really correct. Example:
TreeMap<Integer, String> treeMap = new TreeMap<Integer, String>();
treeMap.put(100, "MarshalLib100");
treeMap.put(110, "MarshalLib110");
treeMap.put(102, "MarshalLib102");
treeMap.put(101, "MarshalLib101");
treeMap.put(150, "MarshalLib150");
System.out.println(treeMap.floorKey(102));
System.out.println(treeMap.floorEntry(102));
System.out.println(treeMap.ceilingKey(102));
System.out.println(treeMap.ceilingEntry(102));
Output:
102
102=MarshalLib102
102
102=MarshalLib102