I know this is a stupid question and I really have been looking around for a few hours... but how can I get Java EE? I would like the Java EE and j2eeadmin tools. What do I download
I have downloaded and installed the jdk-6u16-windows-i586 (Java SE Development Kit 6u16 for Windows)
Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks.
JavaEE sometimes hard to define
Oh, your question isn't so stupid. It turns out that downloading JavaEE is a slightly tricky thing.
If you go over to Sun, you will find this located at http://java.sun.com/javaee/downloads/. But that's actually a GlassFish d/l. It's fine, but if you go somewhere else you might end up with JBoss which will have its own container implementations and its own package of modules to load. JavaEE is a big umbrella of technologies, many of them quite clunky and obsolete, and in any case you develop and deploy a very specific collection of things, rather than a program which just loads classes from some bigger version of JavaSE.
Or, you might want to start with something even smaller, like Tomcat.
You might want to think more in terms of "how should I set up to develop for the xyz application server".
If you want to just play with JMS on your local computer, you could start with GlassFish from Sun. It will pretty much "just work" out of the box.
Yes, you get the full boat Java EE app server and stack as well, of which JMS is but a component, but at the same time it's trivial to install and get working. Especially if you add in NetBeans as the IDE, since it's well integrated with GlassFish.
That said, you certainly don't need an entire Java EE app server just to use JMS. There are many JMS compatible Messaging servers available. ActiveMQ is a single example.
I only suggest Glassfish because it has a great out of box experience in terms of download, install, start up and it's running.
If you want to work on configuring another option, there are several.
Also, I suggest GlassFish (or any full Java EE server) simply because even if you're just interested in JMS, you'll likely find that the Java EE Message Driven Bean (MDB) model actually works pretty well as a mechanism to leverage JMS. And it, too, is pretty simple to set up for the basic use cases. Once you have an MDB, you might want to talk to a database, and the Java EE server has connection pooling, etc. built in already as well. You also get transaction management with Java EE (which can actually be important with JMS).
Basically, while JMS alone is interesting, the other services are also compelling, even if you "don't need them yet". If you want to dabble with them, they're readily available in a full Java EE server, which promotes experimentation, and perhaps adoption.
So, starting with a GlassFish download can actually be an interesting door for learning and discovery things above and beyond JMS.
http://developers.sun.com/downloads/
Select the Java EE link. Select Java EE 5 (first option). One reason I didn't post the link directly is that you'll be sent to a different link depending on the operating system you are using.
see Java EE at: http://developers.sun.com/downloads/
Related
I'm gonna be creating a fairly straightforward Java app for my company that will process a csv file nightly. It's going to be running on our existing Small Business Server 2011 box so it definitely needs to run as a service (cause it has to run whether someone is logged into the server or not). Eventually I'd like to add a web component to it so I can view the log files from this app via a browser instead of having to pull them off the server manually.
I'm looking for feedback on what would be the best approach for this project. Should I use Jave SE and use a service wrapper around the created app to turn it into a service. Or should I use Jave EE (which I assume already runs as a service)? I've never used or developed for Java EE, so I'm not sure if this would be the best approach or if it would be overkill. If Jave EE is the best approach any and all information you can share on how to get started with it would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Harry
For the short term, are you looking for a web interface through which someone uploads (web interface) or some process pushes (web service) a csv file that you then process? If yes, then consider Java EE: servlets, RESTful web services, and such, as others have mentioned.
Otherwise, are you just going to process an existing csv file that's "out on the file system somewhere" on a scheduled basis? If yes then consider timer based Java EE service.
Your production environment's management team might have some insight on what they'd prefer. If they are oriented around a windows management scheme they might be more comfortable with the "native windows" approach to deployment, start, stop, restart, scheduling, etc (i.e. the service-wrapped java program). Another layer of "service management" for just one process may be unnecessary complexity.
Document your setup/configuration/expectations whatever you do.
Longer term, as pointed out by others, your desire for a java-based web monitoring interface will require an app server. Consider your short/longer priorities, schedules to be met, etc. What do you need, when?
Java EE is a set of APIs, including JMS, servlet, JNDI, JDBC, EJBs etc. Consequently by using any one of these APIs you can pretty much claim that you're using Java EE, for what it's worth.
As to your particular problem, I would perhaps develop your program as a simple servlet based app and run it under a small container such as Jetty. That way you have a lightweight container (Jetty) and a fairly trivial program to write that can have a simple front-end for admin/monitoring. Note that the Servlet API forms part of the Java EE spec, so you're Java EE compliant, albeit in a minor fashion.
An alternative to this is (depending on how important that web interface is) is to write the program as a standalone program, and run it as a service using the Java Service Wrapper. At a later date you can then embed Jetty into your program and write your simple servlet-based API to run under the embedded web server. I used this approach on a number of projects and it works very well.
Anything that requires enterprise-level functionality should be done using Java EE:
The Java EE platform is built on top of the Java SE platform. The Java EE platform provides an API and runtime environment for developing and running large-scale, multi-tiered, scalable, reliable, and secure network applications.
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/firstcup/doc/gkhoy.html
Others have explained you what is JavaEE.
Since you say "simple", I guess JSP and Servlets can do the work. You will need a web container like tomcat and that's all(it is easier than having a ejb container + web!). Actually servlets and JSP can do stuff which are not simple too.
If you are willing to use something like sessions, which have great design than Servlet sessions, then you might want to deal with EJB and all.
Unless you're ready to implement a web server yourself from Java SE, you don't have much choice: you'll need some web application framework. It can ba a Java EE web container, or another implementation like Play, for example. But Java SE won't be sufficient.
You may use webservices for instance axis2
I need to decide between various Java technologies to install on a Linux server.
My back end (biz logic) is a Java program that must communicate with C functions using JNI. This Java program also must communicate with Oracle database (11G) using JDBC on one side, and BlazeDS residing in a Java-based Application Server on the other side (to communicate with Flash plug-in on client side). I also need an HTTP web server.
Not knowing much about Java, I wonder what the highest performance (e.g. fastest) and/or cleanest solution might be.
For example, should I install JDK on the server to provide JNI functionality, then then use Tomcat for everything else? Or, does Tomcat also include JNI? Or would something like JBoss which includes J2EE and serveletts capability be better, since it does everything in one package?
Just trying to learn any conventional wisdom about possible solutions, and pros and cons about going one way versus another.
Any Java runtime environment can do JNI - so by implication if you have any application server (e.g. Tomcat or JBoss) running then you should be able to do JNI just fine.
Tomcat would be perfectly fine for what you are describing.
It's a popular lightweight application server
It supports servlets and JSPs so works well for serving HTML
It's probably a bit simpler to get started with than a full JBoss setup
On the other hand JBoss is great as well.
More of an "Enterprisey" focus - you can optionally get excellent commercial support from Red Hat
Might make sense if you wanted to leverage some of the other products in the JBoss ecosystem
I basically think both would serve your needs. I'd probably suggest writing a simple servlet-based application and try deploying it to both Tomcat and JBoss to see which one you prefer. If you stick to standard servlet features then your app should run on both Tomcat and JBoss so you can keep your options open.
The other thing to consider early is tool support - make sure you get comfortable and happy with your Java IDE tooling for your app development. My personal choice is Eclipse, which has great support via plugins for both JBoss and Tomcat. But most of the other major Java IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA or Netbeans should serve your purposes as well.
G-WAN is an HTTP server (critera #3) which executes Java scripts that can use Jar and other Java classes (criteria #2) while at the same time run C/C++ scripts (criteria #1).
The advantage of this solution is that you will have only one program running (no intermediate layers, no wrappers).
Disclamer: I am involved in the development of this project.
What is the best (easiest, most seamless) way to build a Java app while relying as little as possible on the actual application-server used in deployment?
For example, say I want to deploy on Apache Geronimo, and later want to use GlassFish, how difficult would the transition be? What is the best way to abstract the use of each app server?
Excuse my ignorance, I'm relatively new to Java development. I want to start a new project, but am unsure on whether to use separate APIs for the functionality I need or develop on top of a chosen app-server from the start.
Thanks for your help,
Ivan
Without getting into too much details, even though you can write bare-bones Java EE code, the configuration around it is not very simple. Each application server has its own set of configuration files and naming conventions (for example, the format for specifying the location of the AS is different in IBM WAS and in JBOSS). Though these are not very important for application development, once you get to the deployment phase, these will become important.
As far as the libraries and your code is concerned as long as you stick to EJB standards you will be able to run your application on majority of the application servers (I know of WAS and JBoss - the code that I wrote didn't have to change for these servers; the configuration though, well that was a different beast !).
Follow Java EE specification as much as possible, while follow server specification least as possible.
If we try to find out what are in common among there Java EE application servers(JBoss, WAS...), answer is Java EE specification which server vendors must follow. If you have 2 solutions on a Java EE problem, you could check which solution comply with Java EE specification better rather than server specification.
From my experience with Jboss and Sun AS, you should just forget about AS-independency.
In sql, for example, you can do quite a lot without employing vendor-specific features. Well, it's not like that in Java EE. For Jboss and SAS even 'hello world' applications will require different configuration. And more application grows, more vendor-specific features you have to use.
In particular, if you look at official Sun Java EE tutorial, you'll find that it employs SAS-specific configuration files (sun-web.xml, sun-ejb-jar.xml, etc) from the very beginning.
But all above applies only if you use full range of Java EE features (like EJB, JMS, mbeans). I've found that if you just have servlets/jsps packaged in one war-archive, such application can still be very portable.
If you have the resources then consider developing and testing for several application servers instead of just your initial target one. This will allow you to - from the start - pinpoint things that need to be configurable and code accordingly.
Personally I would consider Glassfish 3.0.1 in such a situation as it is the reference implementation, so things should at least work there without any special efforts.
At the moment, I have lot's of Java which does all kind of nifty stuff and I'm happy with it. The code is command line driven which have been great so far, but I recently decided I want to make the functionality available through web-services. Since my is complex and I'm happy with the way it's written , I don't want go through the pain of porting it to other languages. So I set out on a google journey to find out what web servers exist (on a Linux machine, though it's interesting to hear the answer without that limitation).
From what I could find, it seems that there are two viable options: Apache Tomcat and Sun Java Server.
What are the reason to choose one on top of the other? what are the strength of each and what are the weaknesses? Or, perhaps, there is a third one which is much easier, flexible and less cumbersome.
Anyone?
Easy, flexible and not cumbersome, that would be Jetty, but also Simpleweb might be useful. You dont say much about your software so i'm not really sure, but for a command line program, I don't think you need all the JavaEE stuff.
The mainstream servers are these.
I think the Apache Tomcat vs Glassfish (Sun Java Server) discussion is irrelevant for your needs, any would do.
There are many containers for Java web applications, they all have their own strengths and weaknesses. If you're looking for a container to support a business application, you should probably take a look at how they differ and work out which suits your business and IT drivers.
The key thing is that they all support the servlet specification - your webapps can run in any of them - which means you can change your mind easily. Some of them will also support more of the Java Enterprise Edition specs, so may be too heavy for your needs.
If you're just getting started, I'd suggest Tomcat. It's basic, but it's reliable, quick to run and start up, and it's got a really easy web-based webapp deployment interface.
Your question is actually a bit too ambiguous and wide. You can in fact run Java code at any machine you like, regardless of the language you programmed the webbased interface in. You can for example create a PHP based website which interacts with a "backend" Java application (the "command line application" as you call it). The only requirement is to have a JRE at the server machine. Then basically everything as web interface suffices: CGI, PHP, ASP, Python, etcetera, you name it. As long as it has access to the underlying commandline runtime, which is in the PHP example to be done by exec().
But Java, actually Java EE, also provides a web application programming interface: the JSP/Servlet API, the web component of the large Java EE API. This make integration with the "commandline Java application" much more seamless. You can basically just put your application in the classpath and import/access/use it in a Servlet class the real Java way:
YourApplication app = new YourApplication();
Result result = app.doStuff();
// ...
To be able to run JSP/Servlet (JSP is at end actually also a Servlet), you need a concrete implementation of the Servlet API (the whole Java EE is just an abstract specification). Apache Tomcat is good to start with, the other popular alternative being Eclipse Jetty. Those are 'simple' servletcontainers which implements the Servlet API, with Jetty being a more embedded approach of it (you can configure and run it as a "plain vanilla" Java Application). But if you need to support/cover the other aspects of the Java EE API as well, then you need an application server, such as Sun Glassfish or JBoss AS (both which by the way uses Tomcat as the servletcontainer part).
To learn more about JSP/Servlet, I can recommend the Coreservlets.com tutorials.
Apache Tomcat should do good.
The standard concept for running code inside a web server is the "Servlet API" from Sun.
Essentially it provides a few interfaces which the web server uses to invoke your code, and defines how the web server should behave. This allows you to write very generic code that can run in a variety of web containers which implement the Servlet API. See the Wikipedia article for details - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Servlet.
They come in all sizes too, depending on your needs. Some small enough for embedding in your own application, some very big. The servlet API allows you not to care.
For a beginner, the quickest way to get up and running, is to download the full version of Netbeans which includes full support for doing this kind of work, and has a built in servlet container.
I primarily use Tomcat and Glassfish for Java EE development at work, but was wondering if anyone knew of any small application servers like Cassini for ASP.NET that would make building and testing faster? I would still eventually deploy to one of our production tomcat/glassfish servers, but would prefer something that is simpler and quicker.
I am probably going to take jetty and geronimo for a spin, any others I should check out?
You might want to check out JRebel which eliminates the need to do a redeploy on ~80% of the cases, making the development quicker.
jetty is good for testing, because it's very easy to start a jetty instance in your tests. if you're also concerned about faster development, then the choice of server is not the only factor.
there's also jonas and resin
This may not answer your question directly, but you may want to consider alternative Framework/Server combinations.
Here are a few Java RAD stacks that I have used in the past and work very well when trying to achieve a rapid development -> build -> test loop:
Spring Roo
Grails
Play Framework
Granted, these are not application servers in their own right, but each of them are frameworks/servers that can be used to achieve the results you are looking for. Roo and Play are both Java based, and Grails is Groovy based.
None of these solutions will work if you are looking for a plain container to deploy your application in to. These are more like all in one solutions.
(...) but was wondering if anyone knew of any small application servers like Cassini for ASP.NET that would make building and testing faster?
You should have a look at this Short screencast on GlassFish v3 session redeployment that shows the session state preservation across redeployments in GlassFish v3. Combined with the "deploy-on-save" feature (vs build and redeploy) offered by the GFv3 IDE plugins for NetBeans or Eclipse, Java EE development is very productive (even if GlassFish is not the fastest to start but well, you don't have to start it that often).
I was a big fan of Jetty but I must say that I just love these two features and consider them as direct answers to your concerns.