We Keep Coding

How to shift element an int left in an array then adding a number to the end? [duplicate]

I have an array of objects in Java, and I am trying to pull one element to the top and shift the rest down by one.
Assume I have an array of size 10, and I am trying to pull the fifth element. The fifth element goes into position 0 and all elements from 0 to 5 will be shifted down by one.
This algorithm does not properly shift the elements:
Object temp = pool[position];
for (int i = 0; i < position; i++) {
array[i+1] = array[i];
}
array[0] = temp;
How do I do it correctly?

Logically it does not work and you should reverse your loop:
for (int i = position-1; i >= 0; i--) {
array[i+1] = array[i];
}
Alternatively you can use
System.arraycopy(array, 0, array, 1, position);

Assuming your array is {10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100}
What your loop does is:
Iteration 1: array[1] = array[0]; {10,10,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100}
Iteration 2: array[2] = array[1]; {10,10,10,40,50,60,70,80,90,100}
What you should be doing is
Object temp = pool[position];
for (int i = (position - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
array[i+1] = array[i];
}
array[0] = temp;

You can just use Collections.rotate(List<?> list, int distance)
Use Arrays.asList(array) to convert to List
more info at: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html#rotate(java.util.List,%20int)

Instead of shifting by one position you can make this function more general using module like this.
int[] original = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
int[] reordered = new int[original.length];
int shift = 1;
for(int i=0; i<original.length;i++)
reordered[i] = original[(shift+i)%original.length];

Just for completeness: Stream solution since Java 8.
final String[] shiftedArray = Arrays.stream(array)
.skip(1)
.toArray(String[]::new);
I think I sticked with the System.arraycopy() in your situtation. But the best long-term solution might be to convert everything to Immutable Collections (Guava, Vavr), as long as those collections are short-lived.

Manipulating arrays in this way is error prone, as you've discovered. A better option may be to use a LinkedList in your situation. With a linked list, and all Java collections, array management is handled internally so you don't have to worry about moving elements around. With a LinkedList you just call remove and then addLast and the you're done.

Try this:
Object temp = pool[position];
for (int i = position-1; i >= 0; i--) {
array[i+1] = array[i];
}
array[0] = temp;
Look here to see it working: http://www.ideone.com/5JfAg

Using array Copy
Generic solution for k times shift k=1 or k=3 etc
public void rotate(int[] nums, int k) {
// Step 1
// k > array length then we dont need to shift k times because when we shift
// array length times then the array will go back to intial position.
// so we can just do only k%array length times.
// change k = k% array.length;
if (k > nums.length) {
k = k % nums.length;
}
// Step 2;
// initialize temporary array with same length of input array.
// copy items from input array starting from array length -k as source till
// array end and place in new array starting from index 0;
int[] tempArray = new int[nums.length];
System.arraycopy(nums, nums.length - k, tempArray, 0, k);
// step3:
// loop and copy all the remaining elements till array length -k index and copy
// in result array starting from position k
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length - k; i++) {
tempArray[k + i] = nums[i];
}
// step 4 copy temp array to input array since our goal is to change input
// array.
System.arraycopy(tempArray, 0, nums, 0, tempArray.length);
}
code
public void rotate(int[] nums, int k) {
if (k > nums.length) {
k = k % nums.length;
}
int[] tempArray = new int[nums.length];
System.arraycopy(nums, nums.length - k, tempArray, 0, k);
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length - k; i++) {
tempArray[k + i] = nums[i];
}
System.arraycopy(tempArray, 0, nums, 0, tempArray.length);
}

In the first iteration of your loop, you overwrite the value in array[1]. You should go through the indicies in the reverse order.

static void pushZerosToEnd(int arr[])
{ int n = arr.length;
int count = 0; // Count of non-zero elements
// Traverse the array. If element encountered is non-zero, then
// replace the element at index 'count' with this element
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++){
if (arr[i] != 0)`enter code here`
// arr[count++] = arr[i]; // here count is incremented
swapNumbers(arr,count++,i);
}
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++){
System.out.print(arr[j]+",");
}
}
public static void swapNumbers(int [] arr, int pos1, int pos2){
int temp = arr[pos2];
arr[pos2] = arr[pos1];
arr[pos1] = temp;
}

Another variation if you have the array data as a Java-List
listOfStuff.add(
0,
listOfStuff.remove(listOfStuff.size() - 1) );
Just sharing another option I ran across for this, but I think the answer from #Murat Mustafin is the way to go with a list

public class Test1 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] x = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
Test1 test = new Test1();
x = test.shiftArray(x, 2);
for (int i = 0; i < x.length; i++) {
System.out.print(x[i] + " ");
}
}
public int[] pushFirstElementToLast(int[] x, int position) {
int temp = x[0];
for (int i = 0; i < x.length - 1; i++) {
x[i] = x[i + 1];
}
x[x.length - 1] = temp;
return x;
}
public int[] shiftArray(int[] x, int position) {
for (int i = position - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
x = pushFirstElementToLast(x, position);
}
return x;
}
}

A left rotation operation on an array of size n shifts each of the array's elements unit to the left, check this out!!!!!!
public class Solution {
private static final Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
public static void main(String[] args) {
String[] nd = scanner.nextLine().split(" ");
int n = Integer.parseInt(nd[0]); //no. of elements in the array
int d = Integer.parseInt(nd[1]); //number of left rotations
int[] a = new int[n];
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
a[i]=scanner.nextInt();
}
Solution s= new Solution();
//number of left rotations
for(int j=0;j<d;j++){
s.rotate(a,n);
}
//print the shifted array
for(int i:a){System.out.print(i+" ");}
}
//shift each elements to the left by one
public static void rotate(int a[],int n){
int temp=a[0];
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
if(i<n-1){a[i]=a[i+1];}
else{a[i]=temp;}
}}
}

You can use the Below codes for shifting not rotating:
int []arr = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12};
int n = arr.length;
int d = 3;
Programm for shifting array of size n by d elements towards left:
Input : {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}
Output: {4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,10,11,12}
public void shiftLeft(int []arr,int d,int n) {
for(int i=0;i<n-d;i++) {
arr[i] = arr[i+d];
}
}
Programm for shifting array of size n by d elements towards right:
Input : {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}
Output: {1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
public void shiftRight(int []arr,int d,int n) {
for(int i=n-1;i>=d;i--) {
arr[i] = arr[i-d];
}
}

import java.util.Scanner;
public class Shift {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner input = new Scanner (System.in);
int array[] = new int [5];
int array1[] = new int [5];
int i, temp;
for (i=0; i<5; i++) {
System.out.printf("Enter array[%d]: \n", i);
array[i] = input.nextInt(); //Taking input in the array
}
System.out.println("\nEntered datas are: \n");
for (i=0; i<5; i++) {
System.out.printf("array[%d] = %d\n", i, array[i]); //This will show the data you entered (Not the shifting one)
}
temp = array[4]; //We declared the variable "temp" and put the last number of the array there...
System.out.println("\nAfter Shifting: \n");
for(i=3; i>=0; i--) {
array1[i+1] = array[i]; //New array is "array1" & Old array is "array". When array[4] then the value of array[3] will be assigned in it and this goes on..
array1[0] = temp; //Finally the value of last array which was assigned in temp goes to the first of the new array
}
for (i=0; i<5; i++) {
System.out.printf("array[%d] = %d\n", i, array1[i]);
}
input.close();
}
}

Write a Java program to create an array of 20 integers, and then implement the process of shifting the array to right for two elements.
public class NewClass3 {
public static void main (String args[]){
int a [] = {1,2,};
int temp ;
for(int i = 0; i<a.length -1; i++){
temp = a[i];
a[i] = a[i+1];
a[i+1] = temp;
}
for(int p : a)
System.out.print(p);
}
}

Is there an API-method to reverse an array [duplicate]

I am trying to reverse an int array in Java.
This method does not reverse the array.
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length; i++)
{
int temp = validData[i];
validData[i] = validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
What is wrong with it?

To reverse an int array, you swap items up until you reach the midpoint, like this:
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length / 2; i++)
{
int temp = validData[i];
validData[i] = validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
The way you are doing it, you swap each element twice, so the result is the same as the initial list.

With Commons.Lang, you could simply use
ArrayUtils.reverse(int[] array)
Most of the time, it's quicker and more bug-safe to stick with easily available libraries already unit-tested and user-tested when they take care of your problem.

Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(yourArray));
java.util.Collections.reverse() can reverse java.util.Lists and java.util.Arrays.asList() returns a list that wraps the the specific array you pass to it, therefore yourArray is reversed after the invocation of Collections.reverse().
The cost is just the creation of one List-object and no additional libraries are required.
A similar solution has been presented in the answer of Tarik and their commentors, but I think this answer would be more concise and more easily parsable.

public class ArrayHandle {
public static Object[] reverse(Object[] arr) {
List<Object> list = Arrays.asList(arr);
Collections.reverse(list);
return list.toArray();
}
}

I think it's a little bit easier to follow the logic of the algorithm if you declare explicit variables to keep track of the indices that you're swapping at each iteration of the loop.
public static void reverse(int[] data) {
for (int left = 0, right = data.length - 1; left < right; left++, right--) {
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
}
}
I also think it's more readable to do this in a while loop.
public static void reverse(int[] data) {
int left = 0;
int right = data.length - 1;
while( left < right ) {
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
// move the left and right index pointers in toward the center
left++;
right--;
}
}

Use a stream to reverse
There are already a lot of answers here, mostly focused on modifying the array in-place. But for the sake of completeness, here is another approach using Java streams to preserve the original array and create a new reversed array:
int[] a = {8, 6, 7, 5, 3, 0, 9};
int[] b = IntStream.rangeClosed(1, a.length).map(i -> a[a.length-i]).toArray();

Guava
Using the Google Guava library:
Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array));

In case of Java 8 we can also use IntStream to reverse the array of integers as:
int[] sample = new int[]{1,2,3,4,5};
int size = sample.length;
int[] reverseSample = IntStream.range(0,size).map(i -> sample[size-i-1])
.toArray(); //Output: [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

for(int i=validData.length-1; i>=0; i--){
System.out.println(validData[i]);
}

Simple for loop!
for (int start = 0, end = array.length - 1; start <= end; start++, end--) {
int aux = array[start];
array[start]=array[end];
array[end]=aux;
}

If working with data that is more primitive (i.e. char, byte, int, etc) then you can do some fun XOR operations.
public static void reverseArray4(int[] array) {
int len = array.length;
for (int i = 0; i < len/2; i++) {
array[i] = array[i] ^ array[len - i - 1];
array[len - i - 1] = array[i] ^ array[len - i - 1];
array[i] = array[i] ^ array[len - i - 1];
}
}

This will help you
int a[] = {1,2,3,4,5};
for (int k = 0; k < a.length/2; k++) {
int temp = a[k];
a[k] = a[a.length-(1+k)];
a[a.length-(1+k)] = temp;
}

This is how I would personally solve it. The reason behind creating the parametrized method is to allow any array to be sorted... not just your integers.
I hope you glean something from it.
#Test
public void reverseTest(){
Integer[] ints = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
Integer[] reversedInts = reverse(ints);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[3]);
assert ints[1].equals(reversedInts[2]);
assert ints[2].equals(reversedInts[1]);
assert ints[3].equals(reversedInts[0]);
reverseInPlace(reversedInts);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[0]);
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> T[] reverse(T[] array) {
if (array == null) {
return (T[]) new ArrayList<T>().toArray();
}
List<T> copyOfArray = Arrays.asList(Arrays.copyOf(array, array.length));
Collections.reverse(copyOfArray);
return copyOfArray.toArray(array);
}
private static <T> T[] reverseInPlace(T[] array) {
if(array == null) {
// didn't want two unchecked suppressions
return reverse(array);
}
Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(array));
return array;
}

Your program will work for only length = 0, 1.
You can try :
int i = 0, j = validData.length-1 ;
while(i < j)
{
swap(validData, i++, j--); // code for swap not shown, but easy enough
}

There are two ways to have a solution for the problem:
1. Reverse an array in space.
Step 1. Swap the elements at the start and the end index.
Step 2. Increment the start index decrement the end index.
Step 3. Iterate Step 1 and Step 2 till start index < end index
For this, the time complexity will be O(n) and the space complexity will be O(1)
Sample code for reversing an array in space is like:
public static int[] reverseAnArrayInSpace(int[] array) {
int startIndex = 0;
int endIndex = array.length - 1;
while(startIndex < endIndex) {
int temp = array[endIndex];
array[endIndex] = array[startIndex];
array[startIndex] = temp;
startIndex++;
endIndex--;
}
return array;
}
2. Reverse an array using an auxiliary array.
Step 1. Create a new array of size equal to the given array.
Step 2. Insert elements to the new array starting from the start index, from the
given array starting from end index.
For this, the time complexity will be O(n) and the space complexity will be O(n)
Sample code for reversing an array with auxiliary array is like:
public static int[] reverseAnArrayWithAuxiliaryArray(int[] array) {
int[] reversedArray = new int[array.length];
for(int index = 0; index < array.length; index++) {
reversedArray[index] = array[array.length - index -1];
}
return reversedArray;
}
Also, we can use the Collections API from Java to do this.
The Collections API internally uses the same reverse in space approach.
Sample code for using the Collections API is like:
public static Integer[] reverseAnArrayWithCollections(Integer[] array) {
List<Integer> arrayList = Arrays.asList(array);
Collections.reverse(arrayList);
return arrayList.toArray(array);
}

There are some great answers above, but this is how I did it:
public static int[] test(int[] arr) {
int[] output = arr.clone();
for (int i = arr.length - 1; i > -1; i--) {
output[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
}
return output;
}

It is most efficient to simply iterate the array backwards.
I'm not sure if Aaron's solution does this vi this call Collections.reverse(list); Does anyone know?

public void getDSCSort(int[] data){
for (int left = 0, right = data.length - 1; left < right; left++, right--){
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
}
}

Solution with o(n) time complexity and o(1) space complexity.
void reverse(int[] array) {
int start = 0;
int end = array.length - 1;
while (start < end) {
int temp = array[start];
array[start] = array[end];
array[end] = temp;
start++;
end--;
}
}

public void display(){
String x[]=new String [5];
for(int i = 4 ; i > = 0 ; i-- ){//runs backwards
//i is the nums running backwards therefore its printing from
//highest element to the lowest(ie the back of the array to the front) as i decrements
System.out.println(x[i]);
}
}

Wouldn't doing it this way be much more unlikely for mistakes?
int[] intArray = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
int[] temp = new int[intArray.length];
for(int i = intArray.length - 1; i > -1; i --){
temp[intArray.length - i -1] = intArray[i];
}
intArray = temp;

Using the XOR solution to avoid the temp variable your code should look like
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length; i++){
validData[i] = validData[i] ^ validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = validData[i] ^ validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[i] = validData[i] ^ validData[validData.length - i - 1];
}
See this link for a better explanation:
http://betterexplained.com/articles/swap-two-variables-using-xor/

2 ways to reverse an Array .
Using For loop and swap the elements till the mid point with time complexity of O(n/2).
private static void reverseArray() {
int[] array = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
for (int i = 0; i < array.length / 2; i++) {
int temp = array[i];
int index = array.length - i - 1;
array[i] = array[index];
array[index] = temp;
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));
}
Using built in function (Collections.reverse())
private static void reverseArrayUsingBuiltInFun() {
int[] array = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array));
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));
}
Output : [6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

public static void main(String args[]) {
int [] arr = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
reverse(arr, arr.length);
}
private static void reverse(int[] arr, int length) {
for(int i=length;i>0;i--) {
System.out.println(arr[i-1]);
}
}

below is the complete program to run in your machine.
public class ReverseArray {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int arr[] = new int[] { 10,20,30,50,70 };
System.out.println("reversing an array:");
for(int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++){
int temp = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
System.out.println(arr[i]);
}
}
}
For programs on matrix using arrays this will be the good source.Go through the link.

private static int[] reverse(int[] array){
int[] reversedArray = new int[array.length];
for(int i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
reversedArray[i] = array[array.length - i - 1];
}
return reversedArray;
}

Here is a simple implementation, to reverse array of any type, plus full/partial support.
import java.util.logging.Logger;
public final class ArrayReverser {
private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(ArrayReverser.class.getName());
private ArrayReverser () {
}
public static <T> void reverse(T[] seed) {
reverse(seed, 0, seed.length);
}
public static <T> void reverse(T[] seed, int startIndexInclusive, int endIndexExclusive) {
if (seed == null || seed.length == 0) {
LOGGER.warning("Nothing to rotate");
}
int start = startIndexInclusive < 0 ? 0 : startIndexInclusive;
int end = Math.min(seed.length, endIndexExclusive) - 1;
while (start < end) {
swap(seed, start, end);
start++;
end--;
}
}
private static <T> void swap(T[] seed, int start, int end) {
T temp = seed[start];
seed[start] = seed[end];
seed[end] = temp;
}
}
Here is the corresponding Unit Test
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
public class ArrayReverserTest {
private Integer[] seed;
#Before
public void doBeforeEachTestCase() {
this.seed = new Integer[]{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8};
}
#Test
public void wholeArrayReverse() {
ArrayReverser.<Integer>reverse(seed);
assertThat(seed[0], is(8));
}
#Test
public void partialArrayReverse() {
ArrayReverser.<Integer>reverse(seed, 1, 5);
assertThat(seed[1], is(5));
}
}

Here is what I've come up with:
// solution 1 - boiler plated
Integer[] original = {100, 200, 300, 400};
Integer[] reverse = new Integer[original.length];
int lastIdx = original.length -1;
int startIdx = 0;
for (int endIdx = lastIdx; endIdx >= 0; endIdx--, startIdx++)
reverse[startIdx] = original[endIdx];
System.out.printf("reverse form: %s", Arrays.toString(reverse));
// solution 2 - abstracted
// convert to list then use Collections static reverse()
List<Integer> l = Arrays.asList(original);
Collections.reverse(l);
System.out.printf("reverse form: %s", l);

static int[] reverseArray(int[] a) {
int ret[] = new int[a.length];
for(int i=0, j=a.length-1; i<a.length && j>=0; i++, j--)
ret[i] = a[j];
return ret;
}

public static int[] reverse(int[] array) {
int j = array.length-1;
// swap the values at the left and right indices //////
for(int i=0; i<=j; i++)
{
int temp = array[i];
array[i] = array[j];
array[j] = temp;
j--;
}
return array;
}
public static void main(String []args){
int[] data = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9};
reverse(data);
}

Java swapping array [duplicate]

I am trying to reverse an int array in Java.
This method does not reverse the array.
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length; i++)
{
int temp = validData[i];
validData[i] = validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
What is wrong with it?

To reverse an int array, you swap items up until you reach the midpoint, like this:
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length / 2; i++)
{
int temp = validData[i];
validData[i] = validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
The way you are doing it, you swap each element twice, so the result is the same as the initial list.

With Commons.Lang, you could simply use
ArrayUtils.reverse(int[] array)
Most of the time, it's quicker and more bug-safe to stick with easily available libraries already unit-tested and user-tested when they take care of your problem.

Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(yourArray));
java.util.Collections.reverse() can reverse java.util.Lists and java.util.Arrays.asList() returns a list that wraps the the specific array you pass to it, therefore yourArray is reversed after the invocation of Collections.reverse().
The cost is just the creation of one List-object and no additional libraries are required.
A similar solution has been presented in the answer of Tarik and their commentors, but I think this answer would be more concise and more easily parsable.

public class ArrayHandle {
public static Object[] reverse(Object[] arr) {
List<Object> list = Arrays.asList(arr);
Collections.reverse(list);
return list.toArray();
}
}

I think it's a little bit easier to follow the logic of the algorithm if you declare explicit variables to keep track of the indices that you're swapping at each iteration of the loop.
public static void reverse(int[] data) {
for (int left = 0, right = data.length - 1; left < right; left++, right--) {
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
}
}
I also think it's more readable to do this in a while loop.
public static void reverse(int[] data) {
int left = 0;
int right = data.length - 1;
while( left < right ) {
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
// move the left and right index pointers in toward the center
left++;
right--;
}
}

Use a stream to reverse
There are already a lot of answers here, mostly focused on modifying the array in-place. But for the sake of completeness, here is another approach using Java streams to preserve the original array and create a new reversed array:
int[] a = {8, 6, 7, 5, 3, 0, 9};
int[] b = IntStream.rangeClosed(1, a.length).map(i -> a[a.length-i]).toArray();

Guava
Using the Google Guava library:
Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array));

In case of Java 8 we can also use IntStream to reverse the array of integers as:
int[] sample = new int[]{1,2,3,4,5};
int size = sample.length;
int[] reverseSample = IntStream.range(0,size).map(i -> sample[size-i-1])
.toArray(); //Output: [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

for(int i=validData.length-1; i>=0; i--){
System.out.println(validData[i]);
}

Simple for loop!
for (int start = 0, end = array.length - 1; start <= end; start++, end--) {
int aux = array[start];
array[start]=array[end];
array[end]=aux;
}

If working with data that is more primitive (i.e. char, byte, int, etc) then you can do some fun XOR operations.
public static void reverseArray4(int[] array) {
int len = array.length;
for (int i = 0; i < len/2; i++) {
array[i] = array[i] ^ array[len - i - 1];
array[len - i - 1] = array[i] ^ array[len - i - 1];
array[i] = array[i] ^ array[len - i - 1];
}
}

This will help you
int a[] = {1,2,3,4,5};
for (int k = 0; k < a.length/2; k++) {
int temp = a[k];
a[k] = a[a.length-(1+k)];
a[a.length-(1+k)] = temp;
}

This is how I would personally solve it. The reason behind creating the parametrized method is to allow any array to be sorted... not just your integers.
I hope you glean something from it.
#Test
public void reverseTest(){
Integer[] ints = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
Integer[] reversedInts = reverse(ints);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[3]);
assert ints[1].equals(reversedInts[2]);
assert ints[2].equals(reversedInts[1]);
assert ints[3].equals(reversedInts[0]);
reverseInPlace(reversedInts);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[0]);
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> T[] reverse(T[] array) {
if (array == null) {
return (T[]) new ArrayList<T>().toArray();
}
List<T> copyOfArray = Arrays.asList(Arrays.copyOf(array, array.length));
Collections.reverse(copyOfArray);
return copyOfArray.toArray(array);
}
private static <T> T[] reverseInPlace(T[] array) {
if(array == null) {
// didn't want two unchecked suppressions
return reverse(array);
}
Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(array));
return array;
}

Your program will work for only length = 0, 1.
You can try :
int i = 0, j = validData.length-1 ;
while(i < j)
{
swap(validData, i++, j--); // code for swap not shown, but easy enough
}

There are two ways to have a solution for the problem:
1. Reverse an array in space.
Step 1. Swap the elements at the start and the end index.
Step 2. Increment the start index decrement the end index.
Step 3. Iterate Step 1 and Step 2 till start index < end index
For this, the time complexity will be O(n) and the space complexity will be O(1)
Sample code for reversing an array in space is like:
public static int[] reverseAnArrayInSpace(int[] array) {
int startIndex = 0;
int endIndex = array.length - 1;
while(startIndex < endIndex) {
int temp = array[endIndex];
array[endIndex] = array[startIndex];
array[startIndex] = temp;
startIndex++;
endIndex--;
}
return array;
}
2. Reverse an array using an auxiliary array.
Step 1. Create a new array of size equal to the given array.
Step 2. Insert elements to the new array starting from the start index, from the
given array starting from end index.
For this, the time complexity will be O(n) and the space complexity will be O(n)
Sample code for reversing an array with auxiliary array is like:
public static int[] reverseAnArrayWithAuxiliaryArray(int[] array) {
int[] reversedArray = new int[array.length];
for(int index = 0; index < array.length; index++) {
reversedArray[index] = array[array.length - index -1];
}
return reversedArray;
}
Also, we can use the Collections API from Java to do this.
The Collections API internally uses the same reverse in space approach.
Sample code for using the Collections API is like:
public static Integer[] reverseAnArrayWithCollections(Integer[] array) {
List<Integer> arrayList = Arrays.asList(array);
Collections.reverse(arrayList);
return arrayList.toArray(array);
}

There are some great answers above, but this is how I did it:
public static int[] test(int[] arr) {
int[] output = arr.clone();
for (int i = arr.length - 1; i > -1; i--) {
output[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
}
return output;
}

It is most efficient to simply iterate the array backwards.
I'm not sure if Aaron's solution does this vi this call Collections.reverse(list); Does anyone know?

public void getDSCSort(int[] data){
for (int left = 0, right = data.length - 1; left < right; left++, right--){
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
}
}

Solution with o(n) time complexity and o(1) space complexity.
void reverse(int[] array) {
int start = 0;
int end = array.length - 1;
while (start < end) {
int temp = array[start];
array[start] = array[end];
array[end] = temp;
start++;
end--;
}
}

public void display(){
String x[]=new String [5];
for(int i = 4 ; i > = 0 ; i-- ){//runs backwards
//i is the nums running backwards therefore its printing from
//highest element to the lowest(ie the back of the array to the front) as i decrements
System.out.println(x[i]);
}
}

Wouldn't doing it this way be much more unlikely for mistakes?
int[] intArray = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
int[] temp = new int[intArray.length];
for(int i = intArray.length - 1; i > -1; i --){
temp[intArray.length - i -1] = intArray[i];
}
intArray = temp;

Using the XOR solution to avoid the temp variable your code should look like
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length; i++){
validData[i] = validData[i] ^ validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = validData[i] ^ validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[i] = validData[i] ^ validData[validData.length - i - 1];
}
See this link for a better explanation:
http://betterexplained.com/articles/swap-two-variables-using-xor/

2 ways to reverse an Array .
Using For loop and swap the elements till the mid point with time complexity of O(n/2).
private static void reverseArray() {
int[] array = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
for (int i = 0; i < array.length / 2; i++) {
int temp = array[i];
int index = array.length - i - 1;
array[i] = array[index];
array[index] = temp;
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));
}
Using built in function (Collections.reverse())
private static void reverseArrayUsingBuiltInFun() {
int[] array = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array));
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));
}
Output : [6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

public static void main(String args[]) {
int [] arr = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
reverse(arr, arr.length);
}
private static void reverse(int[] arr, int length) {
for(int i=length;i>0;i--) {
System.out.println(arr[i-1]);
}
}

below is the complete program to run in your machine.
public class ReverseArray {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int arr[] = new int[] { 10,20,30,50,70 };
System.out.println("reversing an array:");
for(int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++){
int temp = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
System.out.println(arr[i]);
}
}
}
For programs on matrix using arrays this will be the good source.Go through the link.

private static int[] reverse(int[] array){
int[] reversedArray = new int[array.length];
for(int i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
reversedArray[i] = array[array.length - i - 1];
}
return reversedArray;
}

Here is a simple implementation, to reverse array of any type, plus full/partial support.
import java.util.logging.Logger;
public final class ArrayReverser {
private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(ArrayReverser.class.getName());
private ArrayReverser () {
}
public static <T> void reverse(T[] seed) {
reverse(seed, 0, seed.length);
}
public static <T> void reverse(T[] seed, int startIndexInclusive, int endIndexExclusive) {
if (seed == null || seed.length == 0) {
LOGGER.warning("Nothing to rotate");
}
int start = startIndexInclusive < 0 ? 0 : startIndexInclusive;
int end = Math.min(seed.length, endIndexExclusive) - 1;
while (start < end) {
swap(seed, start, end);
start++;
end--;
}
}
private static <T> void swap(T[] seed, int start, int end) {
T temp = seed[start];
seed[start] = seed[end];
seed[end] = temp;
}
}
Here is the corresponding Unit Test
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
public class ArrayReverserTest {
private Integer[] seed;
#Before
public void doBeforeEachTestCase() {
this.seed = new Integer[]{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8};
}
#Test
public void wholeArrayReverse() {
ArrayReverser.<Integer>reverse(seed);
assertThat(seed[0], is(8));
}
#Test
public void partialArrayReverse() {
ArrayReverser.<Integer>reverse(seed, 1, 5);
assertThat(seed[1], is(5));
}
}

Here is what I've come up with:
// solution 1 - boiler plated
Integer[] original = {100, 200, 300, 400};
Integer[] reverse = new Integer[original.length];
int lastIdx = original.length -1;
int startIdx = 0;
for (int endIdx = lastIdx; endIdx >= 0; endIdx--, startIdx++)
reverse[startIdx] = original[endIdx];
System.out.printf("reverse form: %s", Arrays.toString(reverse));
// solution 2 - abstracted
// convert to list then use Collections static reverse()
List<Integer> l = Arrays.asList(original);
Collections.reverse(l);
System.out.printf("reverse form: %s", l);

static int[] reverseArray(int[] a) {
int ret[] = new int[a.length];
for(int i=0, j=a.length-1; i<a.length && j>=0; i++, j--)
ret[i] = a[j];
return ret;
}

public static int[] reverse(int[] array) {
int j = array.length-1;
// swap the values at the left and right indices //////
for(int i=0; i<=j; i++)
{
int temp = array[i];
array[i] = array[j];
array[j] = temp;
j--;
}
return array;
}
public static void main(String []args){
int[] data = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9};
reverse(data);
}

how to print non repeated numbers from integer array using java and without using predefined api's? [duplicate]

I was asked to write my own implementation to remove duplicated values in an array. Here is what I have created. But after tests with 1,000,000 elements it took very long time to finish. Is there something that I can do to improve my algorithm or any bugs to remove ?
I need to write my own implementation - not to use Set, HashSet etc. Or any other tools such as iterators. Simply an array to remove duplicates.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
int end = arr.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (arr[i] == arr[j]) {
int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j+1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
arr[shiftLeft] = arr[k];
}
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
int[] whitelist = new int[end];
for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
whitelist[i] = arr[i];
}
return whitelist;
}

you can take the help of Set collection
int end = arr.length;
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
now if you will iterate through this set, it will contain only unique values. Iterating code is like this :
Iterator it = set.iterator();
while(it.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(it.next());
}

If you are allowed to use Java 8 streams:
Arrays.stream(arr).distinct().toArray();

Note: I am assuming the array is sorted.
Code:
int[] input = new int[]{1, 1, 3, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10};
int current = input[0];
boolean found = false;
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
if (current == input[i] && !found) {
found = true;
} else if (current != input[i]) {
System.out.print(" " + current);
current = input[i];
found = false;
}
}
System.out.print(" " + current);
output:
1 3 7 8 9 10

Slight modification to the original code itself, by removing the innermost for loop.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr){
int end = arr.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (arr[i] == arr[j]) {
/*int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j+1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
arr[shiftLeft] = arr[k];
}*/
arr[j] = arr[end-1];
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
int[] whitelist = new int[end];
/*for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
whitelist[i] = arr[i];
}*/
System.arraycopy(arr, 0, whitelist, 0, end);
return whitelist;
}

There exists many solution of this problem.
The sort approach
You sort your array and resolve only unique items
The set approach
You declare a HashSet where you put all item then you have only unique ones.
You create a boolean array that represent the items all ready returned, (this depend on your data in the array).
If you deal with large amount of data i would pick the 1. solution. As you do not allocate additional memory and sorting is quite fast. For small set of data the complexity would be n^2 but for large i will be n log n.

Since you can assume the range is between 0-1000 there is a very simple and efficient solution
//Throws an exception if values are not in the range of 0-1000
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
boolean[] set = new boolean[1001]; //values must default to false
int totalItems = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
if (!set[arr[i]]) {
set[arr[i]] = true;
totalItems++;
}
}
int[] ret = new int[totalItems];
int c = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < set.length; ++i) {
if (set[i]) {
ret[c++] = i;
}
}
return ret;
}
This runs in linear time O(n). Caveat: the returned array is sorted so if that is illegal then this answer is invalid.

class Demo
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int a[]={3,2,1,4,2,1};
System.out.print("Before Sorting:");
for (int i=0;i<a.length; i++ )
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
System.out.print ("\nAfter Sorting:");
//sorting the elements
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
for(int j=i;j<a.length;j++)
{
if(a[i]>a[j])
{
int temp=a[i];
a[i]=a[j];
a[j]=temp;
}
}
}
//After sorting
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
System.out.print("\nAfter removing duplicates:");
int b=0;
a[b]=a[0];
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
if (a[b]!=a[i])
{
b++;
a[b]=a[i];
}
}
for (int i=0;i<=b;i++ )
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
}
}
OUTPUT:Before Sortng:3 2 1 4 2 1 After Sorting:1 1 2 2 3 4
Removing Duplicates:1 2 3 4

Since this question is still getting a lot of attention, I decided to answer it by copying this answer from Code Review.SE:
You're following the same philosophy as the bubble sort, which is
very, very, very slow. Have you tried this?:
Sort your unordered array with quicksort. Quicksort is much faster
than bubble sort (I know, you are not sorting, but the algorithm you
follow is almost the same as bubble sort to traverse the array).
Then start removing duplicates (repeated values will be next to each
other). In a for loop you could have two indices: source and
destination. (On each loop you copy source to destination unless they
are the same, and increment both by 1). Every time you find a
duplicate you increment source (and don't perform the copy).
#morgano

import java.util.Arrays;
public class Practice {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int a[] = { 1, 3, 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 10 };
Arrays.sort(a);
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length - 1; i++) {
if (a[i] != a[i + 1]) {
a[j] = a[i];
j++;
}
}
a[j] = a[a.length - 1];
for (int i = 0; i <= j; i++) {
System.out.println(a[i]);
}
}
}
**This is the most simplest way**

What if you create two boolean arrays: 1 for negative values and 1 for positive values and init it all on false.
Then you cycle thorugh the input array and lookup in the arrays if you've encoutered the value already.
If not, you add it to the output array and mark it as already used.

package com.pari.practice;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.pari.sort.Sort;
public class RemoveDuplicates {
/**
* brute force- o(N square)
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups(int[] input){
boolean[] isSame = new boolean[input.length];
int sameNums = 0;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
for( int j = i+1; j < input.length; j++){
if( input[j] == input[i] ){ //compare same
isSame[j] = true;
sameNums++;
}
}
}
//compact the array into the result.
int[] result = new int[input.length-sameNums];
int count = 0;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
if( isSame[i] == true) {
continue;
}
else{
result[count] = input[i];
count++;
}
}
return result;
}
/**
* set - o(N)
* does not guarantee order of elements returned - set property
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups1(int[] input){
HashSet myset = new HashSet();
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
myset.add(input[i]);
}
//compact the array into the result.
int[] result = new int[myset.size()];
Iterator setitr = myset.iterator();
int count = 0;
while( setitr.hasNext() ){
result[count] = (int) setitr.next();
count++;
}
return result;
}
/**
* quicksort - o(Nlogn)
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups2(int[] input){
Sort st = new Sort();
st.quickSort(input, 0, input.length-1); //input is sorted
//compact the array into the result.
int[] intermediateResult = new int[input.length];
int count = 0;
int prev = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
if( input[i] != prev ){
intermediateResult[count] = input[i];
count++;
}
prev = input[i];
}
int[] result = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(intermediateResult, 0, result, 0, count);
return result;
}
public static void printArray(int[] input){
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
System.out.print(input[i] + " ");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args){
int[] input = {5,6,8,0,1,2,5,9,11,0};
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups(input));
System.out.println();
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups1(input));
System.out.println();
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups2(input));
}
}
Output:
5 6 8 0 1 2 9 11
0 1 2 5 6 8 9 11
0 1 2 5 6 8 9 11
I have just written the above code for trying out. thanks.

public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr){
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
final int len = arr.length;
//changed end to len
for(int i = 0; i < len; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
int[] whitelist = new int[set.size()];
int i = 0;
for (Iterator<Integer> it = set.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
whitelist[i++] = it.next();
}
return whitelist;
}
Runs in O(N) time instead of your O(N^3) time

Not a big fun of updating user input, however considering your constraints...
public int[] removeDup(int[] nums) {
Arrays.sort(nums);
int x = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (i == 0 || nums[i] != nums[i - 1]) {
nums[x++] = nums[i];
}
}
return Arrays.copyOf(nums, x);
}
Array sort can be easily replaced with any nlog(n) algorithm.

This is simple way to sort the elements in the array
public class DublicatesRemove {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("enter size of the array");
int l = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
int[] a = new int[l];
// insert elements in the array logic
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++)
{
System.out.println("enter a element");
int el = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
a[i] = el;
}
// sorting elements in the array logic
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < l - 1; j++)
{
if (a[j] > a[j + 1])
{
int temp = a[j];
a[j] = a[j + 1];
a[j + 1] = temp;
}
}
}
// remove duplicate elements logic
int b = 0;
a[b] = a[0];
for (int i = 1; i < l; i++)
{
if (a[b] != a[i])
{
b++;
a[b]=a[i];
}
}
for(int i=0;i<=b;i++)
{
System.out.println(a[i]);
}
}
}

Okay, so you cannot use Set or other collections. One solution I don't see here so far is one based on the use of a Bloom filter, which essentially is an array of bits, so perhaps that passes your requirements.
The Bloom filter is a lovely and very handy technique, fast and space-efficient, that can be used to do a quick check of the existence of an element in a set without storing the set itself or the elements. It has a (typically small) false positive rate, but no false negative rate. In other words, for your question, if a Bloom filter tells you that an element hasn't been seen so far, you can be sure it hasn't. But if it says that an element has been seen, you actually need to check. This still saves a lot of time if there aren't too many duplicates in your list (for those, there is no looping to do, except in the small probability case of a false positive --you typically chose this rate based on how much space you are willing to give to the Bloom filter (rule of thumb: less than 10 bits per unique element for a false positive rate of 1%).
There are many implementations of Bloom filters, see e.g. here or here, so I won't repeat that in this answer. Let us just assume the api described in that last reference, in particular, the description of put(E e):
true if the Bloom filter's bits changed as a result of this operation. If the bits changed, this is definitely the first time object has been added to the filter. If the bits haven't changed, this might be the first time object has been added to the filter. (...)
An implementation using such a Bloom filter would then be:
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
ArrayList<Integer> out = new ArrayList<>();
int n = arr.length;
BloomFilter<Integer> bf = new BloomFilter<>(...); // decide how many bits and how many hash functions to use (compromise between space and false positive rate)
for (int e : arr) {
boolean might_contain = !bf.put(e);
boolean found = false;
if (might_contain) {
// check if false positive
for (int u : out) {
if (u == e) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!found) {
out.add(e);
}
}
return out.stream().mapToInt(i -> i).toArray();
}
Obviously, if you can alter the incoming array in place, then there is no need for an ArrayList: at the end, when you know the actual number of unique elements, just arraycopy() those.

For a sorted Array, just check the next index:
//sorted data!
public static int[] distinct(int[] arr) {
int[] temp = new int[arr.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
int current = arr[i];
if(count > 0 )
if(temp[count - 1] == current)
continue;
temp[count] = current;
count++;
}
int[] whitelist = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(temp, 0, whitelist, 0, count);
return whitelist;
}

You need to sort your array then then loop and remove duplicates. As you cannot use other tools you need to write be code yourself.
You can easily find examples of quicksort in Java on the internet (on which this example is based).
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final int[] original = new int[]{1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
quicksort(original);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
final int[] unqiue = new int[original.length];
int prev = original[0];
unqiue[0] = prev;
int count = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < original.length; ++i) {
if (original[i] != prev) {
unqiue[count++] = original[i];
}
prev = original[i];
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(unqiue));
final int[] compressed = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(unqiue, 0, compressed, 0, count);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(compressed));
}
private static void quicksort(final int[] values) {
if (values.length == 0) {
return;
}
quicksort(values, 0, values.length - 1);
}
private static void quicksort(final int[] values, final int low, final int high) {
int i = low, j = high;
int pivot = values[low + (high - low) / 2];
while (i <= j) {
while (values[i] < pivot) {
i++;
}
while (values[j] > pivot) {
j--;
}
if (i <= j) {
swap(values, i, j);
i++;
j--;
}
}
if (low < j) {
quicksort(values, low, j);
}
if (i < high) {
quicksort(values, i, high);
}
}
private static void swap(final int[] values, final int i, final int j) {
final int temp = values[i];
values[i] = values[j];
values[j] = temp;
}
So the process runs in 3 steps.
Sort the array - O(nlgn)
Remove duplicates - O(n)
Compact the array - O(n)
So this improves significantly on your O(n^3) approach.
Output:
[1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1]
[1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 4, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9]
EDIT
OP states values inside array doesn't matter really. But I can assume that range is between 0-1000. This is a classic case where an O(n) sort can be used.
We create an array of size range +1, in this case 1001. We then loop over the data and increment the values on each index corresponding to the datapoint.
We can then compact the resulting array, dropping values the have not been incremented. This makes the values unique as we ignore the count.
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final int[] original = new int[]{1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1, 1000, 1000};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
final int[] buckets = new int[1001];
for (final int i : original) {
buckets[i]++;
}
final int[] unique = new int[original.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < buckets.length; ++i) {
if (buckets[i] > 0) {
unique[count++] = i;
}
}
final int[] compressed = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(unique, 0, compressed, 0, count);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(compressed));
}
Output:
[1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1, 1000, 1000]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 1000]

public static void main(String args[]) {
int[] intarray = {1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5};
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int i : intarray) {
set.add(i);
}
Iterator<Integer> setitr = set.iterator();
for(int pos=0; pos < intarray.length; pos ++) {
if(pos < set.size()) {
intarray[pos] =setitr.next();
} else {
intarray[pos]= 0;
}
}
for(int i: intarray)
System.out.println(i);
}

I know this is kinda dead but I just wrote this for my own use. It's more or less the same as adding to a hashset and then pulling all the elements out of it. It should run in O(nlogn) worst case.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] numbers) {
Entry[] entries = new Entry[numbers.length];
int size = 0;
for (int i = 0 ; i < numbers.length ; i++) {
int nextVal = numbers[i];
int index = nextVal % entries.length;
Entry e = entries[index];
if (e == null) {
entries[index] = new Entry(nextVal);
size++;
} else {
if(e.insert(nextVal)) {
size++;
}
}
}
int[] result = new int[size];
int index = 0;
for (int i = 0 ; i < entries.length ; i++) {
Entry current = entries[i];
while (current != null) {
result[i++] = current.value;
current = current.next;
}
}
return result;
}
public static class Entry {
int value;
Entry next;
Entry(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public boolean insert(int newVal) {
Entry current = this;
Entry prev = null;
while (current != null) {
if (current.value == newVal) {
return false;
} else if(current.next != null) {
prev = current;
current = next;
}
}
prev.next = new Entry(value);
return true;
}
}

int tempvar=0; //Variable for the final array without any duplicates
int whilecount=0; //variable for while loop
while(whilecount<(nsprtable*2)-1) //nsprtable can be any number
{
//to check whether the next value is idential in case of sorted array
if(temparray[whilecount]!=temparray[whilecount+1])
{
finalarray[tempvar]=temparray[whilecount];
tempvar++;
whilecount=whilecount+1;
}
else if (temparray[whilecount]==temparray[whilecount+1])
{
finalarray[tempvar]=temparray[whilecount];
tempvar++;
whilecount=whilecount+2;
}
}
Hope this helps or solves the purpose.

package javaa;
public class UniqueElementinAnArray
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int[] a = {10,10,10,10,10,100};
int[] output = new int[a.length];
int count = 0;
int num = 0;
//Iterate over an array
for(int i=0; i<a.length; i++)
{
num=a[i];
boolean flag = check(output,num);
if(flag==false)
{
output[count]=num;
++count;
}
}
//print the all the elements from an array except zero's (0)
for (int i : output)
{
if(i!=0 )
System.out.print(i+" ");
}
}
/***
* If a next number from an array is already exists in unique array then return true else false
* #param arr Unique number array. Initially this array is an empty.
* #param num Number to be search in unique array. Whether it is duplicate or unique.
* #return true: If a number is already exists in an array else false
*/
public static boolean check(int[] arr, int num)
{
boolean flag = false;
for(int i=0;i<arr.length; i++)
{
if(arr[i]==num)
{
flag = true;
break;
}
}
return flag;
}
}

public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
int end = arr.length;
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>(end);
for(int i = 0 ; i < end ; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
return set.toArray();
}

You can use an auxiliary array (temp) which in indexes are numbers of main array. So the time complexity will be liner and O(n). As we want to do it without using any library, we define another array (unique) to push non-duplicate elements:
var num = [2,4,9,4,1,2,24,12,4];
let temp = [];
let unique = [];
let j = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < num.length; i++){
if (temp[num[i]] !== 1){
temp[num[i]] = 1;
unique[j++] = num[i];
}
}
console.log(unique);

If you are looking to remove duplicates using the same array and also keeping the time complexity of O(n). Then this should do the trick. Also, would only work if the array is sorted.
function removeDuplicates_sorted(arr){
let j = 0;
for(let x = 0; x < arr.length - 1; x++){
if(arr[x] != arr[x + 1]){
arr[j++] = arr[x];
}
}
arr[j++] = arr[arr.length - 1];
arr.length = j;
return arr;
}
Here is for an unsorted array, its O(n) but uses more space complexity then the sorted.
function removeDuplicates_unsorted(arr){
let map = {};
let j = 0;
for(var numbers of arr){
if(!map[numbers]){
map[numbers] = 1;
arr[j++] = numbers;
}
}
arr.length = j;
return arr;
}

Note to other readers who desire to use the Set method of solving this problem: If original ordering must be preserved, do not use HashSet as in the top result. HashSet does not guarantee the preservation of the original order, so LinkedHashSet should be used instead-this keeps track of the order in which the elements were inserted into the set and returns them in that order.

This is an interview question.
public class Test4 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int a[] = {1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6,6,6,6,6,66,7,65};
int newlength = lengthofarraywithoutduplicates(a);
for(int i = 0 ; i < newlength ;i++) {
System.out.println(a[i]);
}//for
}//main
private static int lengthofarraywithoutduplicates(int[] a) {
int count = 1 ;
for (int i = 1; i < a.length; i++) {
int ch = a[i];
if(ch != a[i-1]) {
a[count++] = ch;
}//if
}//for
return count;
}//fix
}//end1
But, it's always better to use Stream :
int[] a = {1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6,6,6,6,6,66,7,65};
int[] array = Arrays.stream(a).distinct().toArray();
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));//[1, 2, 3, 6, 66, 7, 65]

How about this one, only for the sorted Array of numbers, to print the Array without duplicates, without using Set or other Collections, just an Array:
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] array) {
int[] nums = new int[array.length];
int addedNumber = 0;
int j = 0;
for(int i=0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (addedNumber != array[i]) {
nums[j] = array[i];
j++;
addedNumber = nums[j-1];
}
}
return Arrays.copyOf(nums, j);
}
An array of 1040 duplicated numbers processed in 33020 nanoseconds(0.033020 millisec).

public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] intArray = { 1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 3, 5, 3, 6, 7, 3, 4, 5 };
Integer[] finalArray = removeDuplicates(intArray);
System.err.println(Arrays.asList(finalArray));
}
private static Integer[] removeDuplicates(Integer[] intArray) {
int count = 0;
Integer[] interimArray = new Integer[intArray.length];
for (int i = 0; i < intArray.length; i++) {
boolean exists = false;
for (int j = 0; j < interimArray.length; j++) {
if (interimArray[j]!=null && interimArray[j] == intArray[i]) {
exists = true;
}
}
if (!exists) {
interimArray[count] = intArray[i];
count++;
}
}
final Integer[] finalArray = new Integer[count];
System.arraycopy(interimArray, 0, finalArray, 0, count);
return finalArray;
}

I feel Android Killer's idea is great, but I just wondered if we can leverage HashMap. So I did a little experiment. And I found HashMap seems faster than HashSet.
Here is code:
int[] input = new int[1000000];
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
Random random = new Random();
input[i] = random.nextInt(200000);
}
long startTime1 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Set start time:" + startTime1);
Set<Integer> resultSet = new HashSet<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
resultSet.add(input[i]);
}
long endTime1 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Set end time:"+ endTime1);
System.out.println("result of set:" + (endTime1 - startTime1));
System.out.println("number of Set:" + resultSet.size() + "\n");
long startTime2 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Map start time:" + startTime1);
Map<Integer, Integer> resultMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
if (!resultMap.containsKey(input[i]))
resultMap.put(input[i], input[i]);
}
long endTime2 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Map end Time:" + endTime2);
System.out.println("result of Map:" + (endTime2 - startTime2));
System.out.println("number of Map:" + resultMap.size());
Here is result:
Set start time:1441960583837
Set end time:1441960583917
result of set:80
number of Set:198652
Map start time:1441960583837
Map end Time:1441960583983
result of Map:66
number of Map:198652

This is not using Set, Map, List or any extra collection, only two arrays:
package arrays.duplicates;
import java.lang.reflect.Array;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class ArrayDuplicatesRemover<T> {
public static <T> T[] removeDuplicates(T[] input, Class<T> clazz) {
T[] output = (T[]) Array.newInstance(clazz, 0);
for (T t : input) {
if (!inArray(t, output)) {
output = Arrays.copyOf(output, output.length + 1);
output[output.length - 1] = t;
}
}
return output;
}
private static <T> boolean inArray(T search, T[] array) {
for (T element : array) {
if (element.equals(search)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
And the main to test it
package arrays.duplicates;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class TestArrayDuplicates {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] array = {1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4};
testArrayDuplicatesRemover(array);
}
private static void testArrayDuplicatesRemover(Integer[] array) {
final Integer[] expectedResult = {1, 2, 3, 4};
Integer[] arrayWithoutDuplicates = ArrayDuplicatesRemover.removeDuplicates(array, Integer.class);
System.out.println("Array without duplicates is supposed to be: " + Arrays.toString(expectedResult));
System.out.println("Array without duplicates currently is: " + Arrays.toString(arrayWithoutDuplicates));
System.out.println("Is test passed ok?: " + (Arrays.equals(arrayWithoutDuplicates, expectedResult) ? "YES" : "NO"));
}
}
And the output:
Array without duplicates is supposed to be: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Array without duplicates currently is: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Is test passed ok?: YES

How do you perform a left shift on a circular array of ints?

Is there an existing method that performs a left shift on a circular array of ints?
Specifically, given an array with 4 items {1,2,3,4} and a shift amount of 2, I would like a method that shifts the first two letters to the back of the array, making it appear like so: {3,4,1,2}.
Would this algorithm work to shift a circular array by one?
algShiftByOne(Array)
{
temp=array[0];
i=1
while(i < Array.length - 1) // Loop from 1 up to array.length == last index
{
// If there is no exception i assume it copies value from
// initial array starting from 1 up to array.length
Array[i - 1] = Array[i];
i++;
}
Array[Array.length]=temp;
}

Here is my go at it... (here is an ideone.com demo)
import java.util.Arrays;
public class Test {
public static void circularShiftLeft(int[] arr) {
if (arr.length == 0)
return;
int first = arr[0];
System.arraycopy(arr, 1, arr, 0, arr.length - 1);
arr[arr.length - 1] = first;
}
public static void main(String[] arg) {
int[] arr = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(arr));
circularShiftLeft(arr);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(arr));
}
}

I had this one as an interview question. A simple in place (and somewhat intuitive) O(2n) solution for rotating m is to take the array, reverse it, then reverse the [0, m] and (m, n] subarrays. My solution, though a little less obvious, is inplace and O(n). Basically the idea is you rotate items forward one at a item, and eventually you will pass through all the elements. The catch is if the array is a multiple of the distance, which is where the GCD comes in. The following will do a rotate right, rotate left is left to the reader as an exercise:
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] f = {0, 4, 8, 2, 6, 7, 4, 5, 3};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(f));
rotate(f, 3);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(f));
}
public static void rotate(int[] arr, int dist){
int tmp, tmp2, gcd = GCD(arr.length, dist);
for(int off=0;off<gcd;off++){
tmp = arr[off];
for(int i=0,idx=off;i<arr.length/gcd;idx=(idx+dist)%arr.length,i++){
tmp2 = arr[(idx+dist)%arr.length];
arr[(idx+dist)%arr.length] = tmp;
tmp = tmp2;
}
}
}
public static int GCD(int a, int b) {
if (b==0) return a;
return GCD(b,a%b);
}

Assuming that you want to shift by n:
Copy the first n elements in an array named , for example, tempNumbers
For each element from n to the last one, shift it to the left by n
Copy the elements from tempNumbers to the end of the original array

Why don't you use a circular (doubly) linked list? In that case you only have to change your 'start pointer'.

Here is some pseudo-code to do what you want.
Array shift(Array a, int shiftLength) {
Array b;
for(i = shiftLength; i < a.size(); i++)
b.add(a.at(i));
for(i = 0; i < shiftLength; i++)
b.add(a.at(i));
return b;
}

This would shift the array a one to the left.
int[] a = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
int[] b = new int[a.length];
System.arraycopy(a, 1, b, 0, a.length - 1);
b[a.length - 1] = a[0];
// b = {2,3,4,5,1}
// edit
a = b;

public static void shift(int[] arr, int offs) {
// e.g. arr = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9; offs = 3
offs %= arr.length;
offs = offs < 0 ? arr.length + offs : offs;
if (offs > 0) {
// reverse whole array (arr = 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1)
for (int i = 0, j = arr.length - 1; i < j; i++, j--)
swap(arr, i, j);
// reverse left part (arr = 7,8,9,6,5,4,3,2,1)
for (int i = 0, j = offs - 1; i < j; i++, j--)
swap(arr, i, j);
// reverse right part (arr = 7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6)
for (int i = offs, j = arr.length - 1; i < j; i++, j--)
swap(arr, i, j);
}
}
private static void swap(int[] arr, int i, int j) {
int tmp = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[j];
arr[j] = tmp;
}