We Keep Coding

Spring boot back end with Swing client

I have a design question: I use DB + Hibernate + SpringBoot as back end in a server and use Swing clients on desktops.
I am considering for a new project the following architecture:
Back end (maybe in separate servers):
SQL DB
Spring Boot + Hibernate Java App
Front end(s):
Swing Java App
later: mobile App; Browser
I have searched a bit, but still have some doubts and feel I am missing something. I initially considered using React for front end. But this is going to take too long for me and I have lots of Swing components that I already optimized (and this my applications tend to use lots of grids with edits "in place")
I searched for Spring + Swing, but what I found was about running everything on the same JVM. I would think that separating them would allow me to (later) build a Mobile or Web front end using the same back end.
To sum it up:
create back end services with spring boot + hibernate on top of SQL db
create Swing front end that consumes those services
(later stage) mobile app to consume these same services
Questions:
Is this a good approach ? Am I seeing this the wrong way
How to "share" the POJOs between the back end and the front end? (thinking about placing the models on a separate lib); I don't mean how to transport them, I mean how to reuse them on both projects.

This is possible.
I would create the backend application with Spring Boot and access a datastore with Spring DATA. I would make services available via REST.
To access REST from your Swing client you must use a REST client of some sort. I would recommend Spring RestTemplate but there are many alternatives.
Synchronous client to perform HTTP requests, exposing a simple,
template method API over underlying HTTP client libraries such as the
JDK HttpURLConnection, Apache HttpComponents, and others.
Since you want mobile support some time in the future you could consider creating a webclient instead and making it cross platform (browser only).
To answer your two questions:
Regarding backend you will be perfectly fine as Spring Boot is a good option. As for the client I personally would not choose Swing today since it is very old and rather go for JavaFX 2 or a web client if that is an option. If you are the only developer and since you are proficient it might be a good solution for you.
You can share the POJOs from you Server for your Client as an api that you include as dependency. However it is usually not recommended to share POJOs but rather generate it on the client side or just type them. In your case if it is a small project it probably is ok. Do what is most easy for you.
I would recommend start using Maven as a build tool if you do not already.
Good luck.

Your request is perfectly valid, as you are a Swing developer and your approach is absolutely fine.
So let's draw the general picture: you're building a backend/frontend product/software.
Backend
Your backend will be a Spring application that will run on a server, let's say http://localhost:8080, serving requests to clients.
You'd probably want to create a #RestController on http://localhost:8080/api/... to expose your functions to your Swing client.
Swing client
Your client will be a Swing application running on your desktop.
To connect your client to the Spring application, you now need to implement a service in your Swing application that will call your Spring web server and fetch the resources from there.
To achieve this goal, may options exist:
Why not plain Java ? Use this tutorial to call your Spring services.
Http components from Apache are quite common.
Spring your app ! Spring API includes RestTemplate that you can use in your Swing app to call Spring backend and fetch resources for your desktop app.
As you can see, this is EXACTLY the same thing as with a website in React:
your web page is the JFrame
your JSX components in React would be your JPanels and components
you'd connect action listeners on components (JComboBox, JButton) to a service calling your Spring backend.
you'd then use the resources fetched from your Spring server to update your application state.
rince and repeat
So, be confident, your approach is correct. You'll find people ranting at you having chosen an obsolete techno but really, who cares?
(May I add, totally a pun, you've been smarter than the JavaFX guys which are now facing the segregation of javafx libraries from the core Java ;-))
And as always... happy coding !

AngularJS + Spring Project architecture

I am planning to start a project and I am looking for the best approach to make a RIA application using AngularJS.
Right know I am pretty sure of those technologies:
AngularJS (+ bootstrap CSS) for the client UI, logic and server
requests.
Spring for bootstrapping the server business logic.
Hibernate + MySQL for persistent data access
Jersey for the Restful web service API.
Spring Security for url and data protection over authentication.
The only piece I feel is not ok is that my application will not be the typical one page app, because it will be large and I want to break it into multiple one page apps, some protected and others public. To serve every index.html I want another technology like Spring MVC, making those small one page apps secure for this points, and also not allowing the access to some resources.
¿Do you think this is a good approach or you would change any of this technologies (like supressing jersey/Spring MVC redundant dependencies)?

i think that in general your aprroach is a good one, but maybe you could use the webapp generator yeoman with the JHispster, a java web app generator.
Or if you don't like the ideia you could add to your data access layer the Spring-Data-JPA, because you will avoid to write the boilerplate code.

Oracle/Java application, recommended architectures

I am working on a desktop Java application that is supposed to connect to an Oracle database via a proxy which can be a Servlet or an EJB or something else that you can suggest.
My question is that what architecture should be used?
Simple Servlets as proxy between client and database, that connects to the database and sends results back to the client.
An enterprise application with EJBs and remote interfaces to access the database
Any other options that I haven't thought of.
Thanks

Depending on how scalable you want the solution to be, you can make a choice.
EJB (3) can make a good choice but then you need a full blown app server.
You can connect directly using jdbc but that will expose url of db (expose as in every client desktop app will make a connection to the DB. you can not pool, and lose lot of flexibilities). I would not recommend going this path unless your app is really a simple one.
You can create a servlet to act as proxy but its tedious and not as scalable. You will have to write lot of code at both ends
What i would recommend is creating a REST based service that performs desired operations on the DB and consume this in your desktop app.

Start off simple. I would begin with a simple servlet/JDBC-based solution and get the system working end-to-end. From that point, consider:
do you want to make use of conenction pooling (most likely). Consider C3P0 / Apache DBCP
do you want to embrace a framework like Spring ? You can migrate to this gradually, and start with using the servlet MVC capabilities, IoC etc. and use more complex solutions as you require
Do you want to use an ORM ? Do you have complex object graphs that you're persisting/querying, and will an ORM simplify your development ?
If you do decide to take this approach, make sure your architecture is well-layered, so you can swap out (say) raw JDBC in favour of an ORM, and that your development is test-driven, such that you have sufficient test cases to confirm that your solution works whilst you're performing the above migrations.
Note that you may never finalise on a solution. As your requirements change, and your application scales, you'll likely want to swap in/out the technology most suitable for your current requirements. Consequently the architecture of your app is more important than the particular toolset that you choose.

Direct usage of JDBC through some ORM (Hibernate for example) ?
If you're developing a stand-alone application, better keep it simple. In order to use ORM or other frameworks you don't need a J2EE App Server (and all the complexity it takes with it).
If you need to exchange huge amounts of data between the DB and the application, just forget about EJBs, Servlets and Web Services, and just go with Hibernate (or directly with plain old JDBC).
A REST based Web Services solution may be good, as long as you don't have complex data, and high numbers (try to profile how long does it takes to actually unmarshal SOAP messages back and to java objects).

I have had a great deal of success with using Spring-remoting and a servlet based approach. This is a great setup for development as well, since you can easily test your code without deploying to an web container.
You start by defining a service interface to retrieve/store your data (POJO's).
Create the implementation, which can use ORM, straight JDBC or some pooling library (container provided or 3rd party). This is irrelevant to the remote deployment.
Develop your application which uses this service directly (no deployment to a server).
When you are satisfied with everything, wrap your implementation in a war and deploy with the Spring DispatcherServlet. If you use maven, it can be done via the war plugin
Configure the desktop to use the service via Spring remoting.
I have found the ability to easily develop the code by running the service as part of the application to be a huge advantage over developing/debugging something running on a server. I have used this approach both with and without an EJB, although the EJB was still accessed via the servlet in our particular case. Only service to service calls used the EJB directly (also using Spring remoting).

web service and web application

I am new to web serivce. I have written a few clients using AXIS2 but nothing more. Now I have to create some service that will be consumed by others. We have a web application written using wicket.
Does my webservice need to be a part of the web application. Can it be a deployed seperately, but still use the same code that is used by the web application.
any tips of how to start including security, authentication etc. Any reference to reading material, tutorial is greatly appreciated.

Taking the questions one at a time:
Does the webservice need to be part of the web application? No. It can be a completely separate project with it's own deployment.
Can it be deployed separately? Yes, see #1.
Can it use the same code as the web app? Yes. This is a matter of how you reference the web app. You might consider branching the code, or just building it in to the web app to begin with.
A couple of resources:
RESTful webservices with Wicket
Web service API for Wicket
Bear in mind, I've never used wicket before so I have no idea if the above links are worthwhile.
Regarding security. You usually provide a web api "key" of some sort to your clients. That key is then passed in to every api call which you then validate for both authentication and authorization. This is how most systems work.
Also, just like with web apps, the calls to the API should go over an SSL connection in order to try and prevent anyone from eavesdropping on the conversation.
As far as logging, this is no different than logging you would set up for a normal web app. There are plenty of logging tools out there like log4j.

Short answer: Generically, yes, you can deploy your web service as part of your web application. You should think of your web service as another "view" on your business logic. If you have followed good patterns (e.g. putting your business logic in a library, not controllers) this shouldn't be too hard.
You may want to "enforce" this by putting shared business logic in one library, and then split the web service and web application into another project.
There are really too many options for web services to list them all, but here's a place to look as a tutorial:
http://static.springsource.org/spring-ws/sites/1.5/reference/html/tutorial.html

Follow the below link that explains how to expose your ASP.Net web application functionality as a web service. The below article takes TrendsInInvestment web application to explain the procedure.Features like authentication,caching and pagination has been included while implementing web service.
1)Link for article.
http://securityresearch.in/index.php/tutorials/how-to-expose-your-asp-net-web-application-functionality-as-awebservice
2)Link for the modified web application,web service and its sample code .
http://securityresearch.in/index.php/projects/f_security/trends-in-investment-web-service-1-0-is-now-available

Advice on Application Architecture

I am about to build a system that will have its own engine, as well as a front end user interface. I would like to decouple these two as much as possible. The engine should be able to accept commands and data, be able to work on this data, and return some result. The jobs for the engine may be long, and the client should have the ability to query the engine at any time for its current status.
A decouple front-end / back-end system is new territory for me and I'm unsure of the best architecture. I want the front end to be web-based. It will send commands to the engine through forms, and will display engine output and current status, all through ajax calls. I will mot likely use a Spring-based web app inside Tomcat.
My question involves the best structure for engine component. These are the possibilities I'm considering:
Implement the engine as a set of threads and data structures within the web app. The advantages here would be a more simple implementation, and messaging between the web app front end and engine would be simple (nothing more than some shared data structures). Disadvantages would be a tight coupling between the front and back ends, reliance on the server container to manage the engine (e.g if the web server or web app crashed, so would the engine).
Implement the back end as a stand alone Java application, and expose its functionality through some service on a TCP port. I like this approach because it's decoupled from the web server. However, I'm not stoked about the amount of low-level networking / communication code required. I would prefer some higher level of message passing that abstracts Sockets etc.
Use an OSGi container like Spring DM server to host both the web app and engine. This approach is nice because the networking code is nonexistent. The engine exposes services to the OSGI container for the web app to consume. The downside here is the learning curve and overhead of a new technology: OSGi. Also, the front and back end remain coupled again which I dont really want. In other words, I couldn't deploy the front end on any old servlet container, it would have to be in the same OSGi container as the engine.
I have a feeling RMI is the way to go here, but again that's a new area of technology for me, and it still doesn't explain how to design the architecture of the underlying systems. What about JMS?
Thank you for any advice.

If you really want to decouple web app and engine,you can also deploy the engine in a different server and expose the API as web service calls (WS-* or REST).

If it's going to be a Web app, there's no need to decouple the processes like there would be if you had a desktop app front end and a server back end. So keep it simple.
The basis I would use (and am using for a project I'm working on currently as it turns out) is this kind of stack:
Spring 3
Web container
Application deployed as a Web application (WAR);
For persistence, either Ibatis (my preferred option) or JPA/Hibernate (if you prefer a more object persistence approach);
Your preferred choice of Web framework. There's no easy answer here and there are dozens to choose from, from the straight templating to the more componentized (JSF, Seam, etc). Tapestry/Wicket look interesting but I'm no expert in either.
A Spring container is entirely capable of launching a series of threads and it's quite common to do so. So what you'll need is a series of components that will simply be your engine. Unless you have a good reason to do otherwise, Spring beans within a Web application context is simple, flexible and powerful.
On the front end it depends on what you want. Straight HTML can be done with any Web framework. Even if decorated by some Javascript. I use jQuery for that kind of thing.
It only gets a little different if you want the front end to look like a desktop app (a so-called "rich" UI). For this you either need to use the Google Web Toolkit ("GWT"), possibly a component Web framework like JSF (although I tend to think these get real messy real fast) or a Javascript framework like ExtJS, SmartClient, YUI or the fairly new Uki.

You'll decouple your UI if you write your back end as services, and establish an XML or JSON message format to pass between client and services.
All the rest of cletus's comments can hold true for the back end, but the client can be blissfully unaware of it. It can even be a .NET implementation for all it cares. The focus is on the use cases and the messages, not the back end implementation.
This can also be useful in those instances when you use a non-HTML based UI (e.g., Flex).