The App Engine Search API has a GeoPoint field. Is it possible to use it to do radius search? As in, given a GeoPoint, find all documents that fall within a certain radius.
As of right now it looks like GeoSpecial Query is by invitation only, so I am seeking a simple alternative that is easy for me to understand.
Also, if somehow this matters, I am using objectify and this answer is too complicated for me to understand how to implement it.
For radius search, use proximitySearch instead of bestBboxSearchCells (using in your reference url):
GeocellManager.proximitySearch(Point center, int maxResults, double maxDistance //...
Use can see in this link for details of methods:
https://github.com/theganyo/javageomodel/blob/ce43c507ff671eb6f0998f7c7d78fd0c3877dbe7/geocell/src/main/java/com/beoui/geocell/GeocellManager.java
And the example code, it is very straightforward:
https://github.com/theganyo/javageomodel/blob/master/geocell/src/test/java/com/beoui/utils/HowToUseGeocell.java
As noted by Alex Martelli, the query string "distance(store_location, geopoint(-33.857, 151.215)) < 45000" would effectively yield the results you seek replacing geopoint() with the location you're looking near and replacing 45000 with the distance within which you'd like the results to be.
This query string is runtime agnostic and can therefore be used in the same way for both Python and Java runtimes.
If you've gone with a different approach, product or solution, feel free to post it here.
I'm trying to make a Java project that pinpoints the place on a image of a map, when given coordinates (taken from Google Maps).
I've tried using the top-left corner of the image (place that has highest latitude, and the lowest longitude), as an some kind of an reference point, which would be (0,0) point on the map image, and than I've tried to calculate every place on the map based on that reference point. However, this method proved inaccurate, probably because of the curvature of the Earth (mind that the map I'm working with (Serbia) covers area of 4° latitude, and 4° longitude).
I've seen couple of answers talking about converting into Mercator projection, but they are not very clear to me, because they are not covering a case similar to mine, and are not written in Java.
What can I do to pinpoint those points more accurately (±3km would be accurate enough)?
As comments have pointed oit correctly, in order to precisely convert between geographic coordinates and map position, you have to know the method of projection used for the map, and a sufficient number of parameters so that tuning the remaining parameters using a suitable set of reference points becomes feasible.
So if you assume a conic projection, then read the document David pointed out, and this referenced follow-up as well. As you can see, within the family of conic projections, there are a few alternatives to choose from. Each of them is described by a few parameters (i.e. standard parallels, cone constant, aspect ratio, …). You'd make guesses for these and then use some numerical optimization to obtain a best fit. Then you take the best parameter fit for each kind of projection and see which of them has the best overall fit. Quite a bit of work. If you don't want to implement the code for all these projections you can use proj.4 either on the command line or as a native library. To do the numeric optimization, you could possibly try to adapt one of the COIN-OR projects to your application.
In any case, the first step would be creating a suitable set of reference points which you can use to evaluate the fit. So pick a few prominent points on your map and find Google Earth coordinates for these. I'd say you should have at least a dozen points, to account for the fact that you know so little about your map. Otherwise there is a great risk that you will tune the large number of parameters to exactly fit your points while the rest of the map is still completely off. Even with this number of reference points, since the area of Serbia is not that big (compared to maps spanning whole continents), the errors of a wrong guess or a bad fit might be very small. So it might be hard to actually decide which projection has been used.
With all that I said above, and even with external libraries taking care of the projection and the numerical optimization, it might easily take you half a year just to set up the tools to work out the projection. So decide whether that's worth the effort. If not, there are several alternatives. One would be to take a different map, one where you know the projection. Or contact the author of your map and obtain the projection. Or ask someone working in geodesics in Serbia, because they might have enough experience to recognize the projection at a glance, I don't know.
One other option is by combining the fact that you need reference points with the fact that you might not be able to work out the exact projection in any case. Simply combine these in the following way: choose a suitably dense set of reference points, evenly distributed over the map. Then interpolate between them, picewise linearily or with higher degree or using some weighted interpolation scheme or whatever. You know there is a projection behind all this, but you give up on working out the projection, and simply mitigate the symptom: by having enough reference points, each data item is close enough to a reference point to keep the error smaller than your threshold.
I found an answer I was looking for in this thread: Java, convert lat/lon to UTM
I find out that the actual projection of my map was UTM. From there, it was simply finding a class that would convert my lat/lon coordinates into UTM eastings and northings (very useful code in this answer), and then I would do simple math to find out where the point is compared to the boundaries of the map, and it's actually working.
I am developing a web page where users can create activities and others find them via a search function. When you create an activity you must specify the exact location where it will take place, assisted by google maps I retrieve the latitude and longitude. Now, when doing a search I want to have the functionality to find all activities close to a specified location(also assisted by google maps).
So I have a set of activities with coordinates, the coordinates of a point I want to find activities nearby, and I want to return activities that are no more than, lets say, 5 km(or miles or whatever you prefer) away from this point.
I am having this idea in my head that this can be solved by calculating max/min latitude and longitude, and use these as parameters in an sql-query where I use a where clause for filtering...The problem I'm facing here is firstly calculating these max/min values, secondly in an circular area(with radius 5km), and not a rectangular
Would appreciate any input here!
Thanks!:)
Coordinates you get are probably not x and y but latitude and longitude; you will need spherical distance unless all your points are within rather small radius, e.g. few hundred miles.
If you have many points, direct exhaustive search becomes too slow, spherical or not. Fortunately, GIS extensions available both for MySQL and for Postgres. Commercial DBs also have spatial extensions. These make searches for nearby objects efficient.
Calculate the boundary latitudes and longitudes.
Use the inverse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haversine_formula
Select everything where the latitude is between your two values for that, and similarly for longitude. If you're not using a spatial index, beware of edge cases on your sphere (a most excellent pun!): crossing 0, 90, or 180 degrees may result in impossible criteria.
Either in your SQL server or your app, execute the Haversine formula against your results. You must have the rectangular bounding values to prevent a table scan, but results in the rectangle will include results outside of your circle.
If you actually stop to think about it, your rectangle and your circle are both misshapen... but that's not really relevant anyway.
Also, check out this, which will expand on distance measuring and mention some other ideas: http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/gis-faq-5.1.html
Hope this can help you.
Get nearest places on Google Maps, using MySQL spatial data
However this is MySQl query. You can convert it as your requirement.
I have a set of points that i want to turn into a closed polygon in Java. I'm currently trying to use java.awt.geom.Point2D and java.awt.geom.Area but can't figure out how to turn a group of the points into an Area.
I think I can define a set of Line2Ds based on the points and then add those to the Areas, but that's a lot of work and I'm lazy. So is there an easier way to go.
The problem is I have a list of lat/lon coordinates and want to build up an area that I can use for hit testing.
Non-core Java libraries are a possibility as well.
Update, I looked at using java.awt.Polygon but it only supports ints and I'm operating with doubles for the coordinates.
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4077518
Hear that, "customer"? You should be using GeneralPath, even though the absence of Polygon2D since the late 1990s is an obvious monster-truck-sized hole in the API.
If you are actually working with Geodetic lat/lon values, you can actually use OpenMap to do some of this work. I just spent some time using the Geo class in that API to bounce an object around an area defined by a polygon of lat/lon points. There are intersection calls and everything and all of the math is done spherically so that the points are more correct as far as projections go.
The simplest (and laziest) thing to do is to create a bounding box for the points from the maximum and minimum of the X, Y ordinate values.
If you need a closer fit then rather than devise your own algorithm, this might be a good place to start:
I am interested in writing a simplistic navigation application as a pet project. After searching around for free map-data I have settled on the US Census Bureau TIGER 2007 Line/Shapefile map data. The data is split up into zip files for individual counties and I've downloaded a single counties map-data for my area.
What would be the best way to read in this map-data into a useable format?
How should I:
Read in these files
Parse them - Regular expression or some library that can already parse these Shapefiles?
Load the data into my application - Should I load the points directly into some datastructure in memory? Use a small database? I have no need for persistence once you close the application of the map data. The user can load the Shapefile again.
What would be the best way to render the map once I have read the in the Shapefile data?
Ideally I'd like to be able to read in a counties map data shapefile and render all the poly-lines onto the screen and allow rotating and scaling.
How should I:
Convert lat/lon points to screen coordinates? - As far as I know the Shapefile uses longitude and latitude for its points. So obviously I'm going to have to convert these somehow to screen coordinates to display the map features.
Render the map data (A series of polylines for roads, boundaries, etc) in a way that I can easily rotate and scale the entire map?
Render my whole map as a series of "tiles" so only the features/lines within the viewing area are rendered?
Ex. of TIGER data rendered as a display map:
Anyone with some experience and insight into what the best way for me to read in these files, how I should represent them (database, in memory datastructure) in my program, and how I should render (with rotating/scaling) the map-data on screen would be appreciated.
EDIT: To clarify, I do not want to use any Google or Yahoo maps API. Similarly, I don't want to use OpenStreetMap. I'm looking for a more from-scratch approach than utilizing those apis/programs. This will be a desktop application.
First, I recommend that you use the 2008 TIGER files.
Second, as others point out there are a lot of projects out there now that already read in, interpret, convert, and use the data. Building your own parser for this data is almost trivial, though, so there's no reason to go through another project's code and try to extract what you need unless you plan on using their project as a whole.
If you want to start from the lower level
Parsing
Building your own TIGER parser (reasonably easy - just a DB of line segments), and building a simple render on top of that (lines, polygons, letters/names) is also going to be fairly easy. You'll want to look at various map projection types for the render phase. The most frequently used (and therefore most familiar to users) is the Mercator projection - it's fairly simple and fast. You might want to play with supporting other projections.
This will provide a bit of 'fun' in terms of seeing how to project a map, and how to reverse that projection (say a user clicks on the map, you want to see the lat/lon they clicked - requires reversing the current projection equation).
Rendering
When I developed my renderer I decided to base my window on a fixed size (embedded device), and a fixed magnification. This meant that I could center the map at a lat/lon, and with the center pixel=center lat/lon at a given magnification, and given the mercator projection I could calculate which pixel represented each lat/lon, and vice-versa.
Some programs instead allow the window to vary, and instead of using magnification and a fixed point, they use two fixed points (often the upper left and lower right corners of a rectangle defining the window). In this case it becomes trivial to determine the pixel to lat/lon transfer - it's just a few interpolation calculations. Rotating and scaling make this transfer function a little more complex, but shouldn't be considerably so - it's still a rectangular window with interpolation, but the window corners don't need to be in any particular orientation with respect to north. This adds a few corner cases (you can turn the map inside out and view it as if from inside the earth, for instance) but these aren't onerous, and can be dealt with as you work on it.
Once you've got the lat/lon to pixel transfer done, rendering lines and polygons is fairly simple except for normal graphics issues (such as edges of lines or polygons overlapping inappropriately, anti-aliasing, etc). But rendering a basic ugly map such as it done by many open source renderers is fairly straightforward.
You'll also be able to play with distance and great circle calculations - for instance a nice rule of thumb is that every degree of lat or lon at the equator is approximately 111.1KM - but one changes as you get closer to either pole, while the other continues to remain at 111.1kM.
Storage and Structures
How you store and refer to the data, however, depends greatly on what you plan on doing with it. A lot of difficult problems arise if you want to use the same database structure for demographics vs routing - a given data base structure and indexing will be fast for one, and slow for the other.
Using zipcodes and loading only the nearby zipcodes works for small map rendering projects, but if you need a route across the country you need a different structure. Some implementations have 'overlay' databases which only contain major roads and snaps routes to the overlay (or through multiple overlays - local, metro, county, state, country). This results in fast, but sometimes inefficient routing.
Tiling
Tiling your map is actually not easy. At lower magnifications you can render a whole map and cut it up. At higher magnifications you can't render the whole thing at once (due to memory/space constraints), so you have to slice it up.
Cutting lines at boundaries of tiles so you can render individual tiles results in less than perfect results - often what is done is lines are rendered beyond the tile boundary (or, at least the data of the line end is kept, though rendering stops once it finds it's fallen off the edge) - this reduces error that occurs with lines looking like they don't quite match as they travel across tiles.
You'll see what I'm talking about as you work on this problem.
It isn't trivial to find the data that goes into a given tile as well - a line may have both ends outside a given tile, but travel across the tile. You'll need to consult graphics books about this (Michael Abrash's book is the seminal reference, freely available now at the preceding link). While it talks mostly about gaming, the windowing, clipping, polygon edges, collision, etc all apply here.
However, you might want to play at a higher level.
Once you have the above done (either by adapting an existing project, or doing the above yourself) you may want to play with other scenarios and algorithms.
Reverse geocoding is reasonably easy. Input lat/lon (or click on map) and get the nearest address. This teaches you how to interpret addresses along line segments in TIGER data.
Basic geocoding is a hard problem. Writing an address parser is a useful and interesting project, and then converting that into lat/lon using the TIGER data is non-trivial, but a lot of fun. Start out simple and small by requiring exact name and format matching, and then start to look into 'like' matching and phonetic matching. There's a lot of research in this area - look at search engine projects for some help here.
Finding the shortest path between two points is a non-trivial problem. There are many, many algorithms for doing that, most of which are patented. I recommend that if you try this go with an easy algorithm of your own design, and then do some research and compare your design to the state of the art. It's a lot of fun if you're into graph theory.
Following a path and pre-emptively giving instructions is not as easy as it looks on first blush. Given a set of instructions with an associated array of lat/lon pairs, 'follow' the route using external input (GPS, or simulated GPS) and develop an algorithm that gives the user instructions as they approach each real intersection. Notice that there are more lat/lon pairs than instructions due to curving roads, etc, and you'll need to detect direction of travel and so forth. Lots of corner cases you won't see until you try to implement it.
Point of interest search. This one is interesting - you need to find the current location, and all the points of interest (not part of TIGER, make your own or get another source) within a certain distance (as the crow flies, or harder - driving distance) of the origin. This one is interesting in that you have to convert the POI database into a format that is easy to search in this circumstance. You can't take the time to go through millions of entries, do the distance calculation (sqrt(x^2 + y^2)), and return the results. You need to have some method or algorithm to cut the amount of data down first.
Traveling salesman. Routing with multiple destinations. Just a harder version of regular routing.
You can find a number of links to many projects and sources of information on this subject here.
Good luck, and please publish whatever you do, no matter how rudimentary or ugly, so others can benefit!
-Adam
SharpMap is an open-source .NET 2.0 mapping engine for WinForms and ASP.NET. This may provide all the functionality that you need. It deals with most common GIS vector and raster data formats including ESRI shapefiles.
the solution is :
a geospatial server like mapserver, geoserver, degree (opensource).
They can read and serve shapefiles (and many other things). For example, geoserver (when installed) serve data from US Census Bureau TIGER shapefiles as demo
a javascript cartographic library like openlayers (see the examples at link text
There are plenty of examples on the web using this solution
Funny question. Here's how I do it.
I gather whatever geometry I need in whatever formats they come in. I've been pulling data from USGS, so that amounts to a bunch of:
SHP Files (ESRI Shapefile Technical Description)
DBF Files (Xbase Data file (*.dbf))
I then wrote a program that "compiles" those shape definitions into a form that is efficient to render. This means doing any projections and data format conversions that are necessary to efficiently display the data. Some details:
For a 2D application, you can use whatever projection you want: Map Projections.
For 3D, you want to convert those latitude/longitudes into 3D coordinates. Here is some math on how to do that: transformation from
spherical coordinates to normal rectangular coordinates.
Break up all the primitives into a quadtree/octree (2D/3D). Leaf nodes in this tree contain references to all geometry that intersects that leaf node's (axis-aligned) bounding-box. (This means that a piece of geometry can be referenced more than once.)
The geometry is then split into a table of vertices and a table of drawing commands. This is an ideal format for OpenGL. Commands can be issued via glDrawArrays using vertex buffers (Vertex Buffer Objects).
A general visitor pattern is used to walk the quadtree/octree. Walking involves testing whether the visitor intersects the given nodes of the tree until a leaf node is encountered. Visitors include: drawing, collision detection, and selection. (Because the tree leaves can contain duplicate references to geometry, the walker marks nodes as being visited and ignores them thereafter. These marks have to be reset or otherwise updated before doing the next walk.)
Using a spatial partitioning system (one of the trees) and a drawing-efficient representation is crucial to achieving high framerates. I have found that in these types of applications, you want your frame rate as high as possible 20 fps at a minimum. Not to mention the fact that lots of performance will give you lots of opportunities to create a better looking map. (Mine's far from good looking, but will get there some day.)
The spatial partitioning helps rendering performance by reducing the number of draw commands sent to the processor. However, there could come a time when the user actually wants to view the entire dataset (perhaps an arial view). In this case, you need a level of detail control system. Since my application deals with streets, I give priority to highways and larger roads. My drawing code knows about how many primitives I can draw before my framerate goes down. The primitives are also sorted by this priority. I draw only the first x items where x is the number of primitives I can draw at my desired framerate.
The rest is camera control and animation of whatever data you want to display.
Here are some examples of my existing implementation:
Picture http://seabusmap.com/assets/Picture%205.png Picture http://seabusmap.com/assets/Picture%207.png
for storing tiger data locally, I would chose Postgresql with the postgis tools.
they have an impressive collection of tools, for you especially the Tiger Geocoder offers good way of importing and using the tiger data.
you will need to take a look at the tools that interact with postgis, most likely some sort of mapserver
from http://postgis.refractions.net/documentation/:
There are now several open source tools which work with PostGIS. The uDig project is working on a full read/write desktop environment that can work with PostGIS directly. For internet mapping, the University of Minnesota Mapserver can use PostGIS as a data source. The GeoTools Java GIS toolkit has PostGIS support, as does the GeoServer Web Feature Server. GRASS supports PostGIS as a data source. The JUMP Java desktop GIS viewer has a simple plugin for reading PostGIS data, and the QGIS desktop has good PostGIS support. PostGIS data can be exported to several output GIS formats using the OGR C++ library and commandline tools (and of cource with the bundled Shape file dumper). And of course any language which can work with PostgreSQL can work with PostGIS -- the list includes Perl, PHP, Python, TCL, C, C++, Java, C#, and more.
edit: depite mapserver having the word SERVER in its name, this will be usable in a desktop environment.
Though you already decided to use the TIGER data, you might be interested in OSM (Open Street Map), beacuse OSM has a complete import of the TIGER data in it, enriched with user contributed data. If you stick to the TIGER format, your app will be useless to international users, with OSM you get TIGER and everything else at once.
OSM is an open project featuring a collaboratively edited free world map. You can get all this data as well structured XML, either query for a region, or download the whole world in a large file.
There are some map renderers for OSM available in various programming languages, most of them open source, but still there is much to be done.
There also is an OSM routing service avaliable. It has a web-interface and might also be queriable via a web service API. Again, it's not all finished. Users could definitely use a desktop or mobile routing application built on top of this.
Even if you don't decide to go with that project, you can get lots of inspiration from it. Just have a look at the project wiki and at the sources of the various software projects which are involved (you will find links to them inside the wiki).
You could also work with Microsoft's visual earth mapping application and api or use Google's api. I have always programmed commercially with ESRI products and have not played with the open api's that much.
Also, you might want to look at Maker! and Finder! They are relatively new programs but I think they are free. Might be limited on embedding the data.Maker can be found here.
The problem is that spatial processing is fairly new in the non commercial scale.
If you don't mind paying for a solution Safe Software produces a product called FME. This tool will help you translate data from any format to just about any other. Including KML the Google Earth Format or render it as a JPEG (or series of JPEGs). After converting the data you can embed google earth into your application using their API or just display the tiled images.
As a side not FME is a very powerful platform so while doing your translations you can add or remove parts of data that you don't necessarily need. Merge sources if you have more than one. Convert coordinates (I don't remember what exactly Google Earth uses). Store backups in a database. But seriously if your willing to shell out a few bucks you should look into this.
You can also create flags (much like in your sample map) which contain a location (where to put it) and other data/comments about the location. These flags come in many shapes and sizes.
One simplification over a Mercator or other projection is to assume a constant conversion factor for the latitude and longitude. Multiply the degrees of latitude by 69.172 miles; for the longitude, pick the middle latitude of your map area and multiply (180-longitude) by cosine(middle_latitude)*69.172. Once you've converted to miles, you can use another set of conversions to get to screen coordinates.
This is what worked for me back in 1979.
My source for the number of miles per degree.
When I gave this answer the question was labeled
"What would be the best way to render a Shapefile (map data) with polylines in .Net?"
Now it is a different question but I leave my answer to the original question.
I wrote a .net version that could draw
vector-data (such as the geometry from
a shp file) using plain GDI+ in c#. It
was quite fun.
The reason was that we needed to
handle different versions of
geometries and attributes with a lot
of additional information so we could
not use a commercial map component or
an open source one.
The main thing when doing this is
establish a viewport and
translate/transform WGIS84 coordinates
to a downscale and GDI+ x,y
coordinates and wait with projection
if you even need to reproject at all.
One solution is to use MapXtreme. They have API's for Java and C#. The API is able to load these files and render them.
For Java:
http://www.mapinfo.com/products/developer-tools/desktop%2c-mobile-%26-internet-offering/mapxtreme-java
For .NET:
http://www.mapinfo.com/products/developer-tools/desktop%2c-mobile-%26-internet-offering/mapxtreme-2008
I used this solution in a Desktop application and it worked well. It offers a lot more that only rendering information.
Now doing this from scratch could take quite a while. They do have an evaluation version that you can download. I think it just prints "MAPXTREME" over the map as a watermark, but it is completely usable otherwise