OAuth is obviously a godsend when it comes to doing single-sign on, although there are doubtless headaches involved in merging different applications' user databases, but we also have a customer requirement to support Active Directory. Can anyone suggest any suitable architectures (or indeed resources/information on the web) for having multiple websites achieve single sign on, using both OAuth and Active Directory? It's conceivable that one domain could be set to be either one or the other, but the ideal would be that we cope with both (e.g. attempt AD auth and fallback to OAuth if not, perhaps?).
We're a primarily Java-based development house, with rich-client web front-ends. We do use EC2 for some of our apps, but also host on our own servers. Ideally any solution would not care about the location of the application itself.
All suggestions and opinions welcome.
You might consider some form of identity federation using SAML-P or WS-Federation.
ADFS in Server 2012 R2 comes with OAuth2 support. Or you could look into AuthorizationServer.
But it might be worth reading this, first. Good luck!
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed last year.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question last year and left it closed:
Opinion-based Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Improve this question
Warning! I'm on a bit of a fishing trip here, and I'm not even sure if the questions that I'm asking entirely make sense. Please be kind with your responses! :)
I recently took over a project that is currently based on a Java + Linux + Tomcat + MySQL. Right now, the system is basically just a website with a few cron jobs in the back-ground to move some data around, etc. In working with the product manager to develop a prioritized backlog, it’s clear from what he wants to do that I need to start developing a service-oriented architecture (SOA <-- buzz word warning!), and I will end up with a blend of web servers and application servers. Note: I’m strongly considering moving to Glassfish v3.
Currently, authentication and authorizations are handled in Java code with user information being stored in the MySQL database. At the bare minimum, it seems to me that I will need to split this out into a separate authentication service (otherwise, will end up with a bunch of duplicate code all over the place to handle user authentication and authorizations).
I’ve been looking into single sign-on (SSO) type solutions and doing some research. From what I can gather, OpenSSO has been officially dropped by Oracle, but picked up by ForgeRock and now is called OpenAM. This appears to be very close to what I want, but since I already have a MySQL-based system, I would prefer to have something that supports it (or some other kind of RDBMS). I found this on Stack Overflow and it seems to indicate that it’s basically LDAP or nothing.
Is there a way to make OpenSSO/OpenAM talk to Database for its authentication and authorization?
My questions are:
What other options are out there to OpenSSO/OpenAM? Is LDAP the way to go? Note: doing a “OpenAM vs” google search doesn’t yield much. Do people tend to just “roll their own”?
Any thoughts/suggestions/links on this topic that will help educate me will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your patience and help.
Are you integrating existing applications, or do you just want to support your own applications?
Are you looking for actual SSO or simply shared credentials? SSO is logging in to a single application, and having that credential propagate to another application (such as logging in to Gmail and being automatically logged in to Blogger). Shared credential is you can use the same login name and password across applications, but the credential itself is not automatically propagated.
LDAP is a common system used to manage a shared credential. Many systems allow you to point their authentication store to an existing LDAP server.
For example, if you had several apps deployed in a Java EE container, and also, say, an email server and web based email client, all of these diverse applications could be pointed to the same LDAP server and your users would have a single login and password for all of the different systems, all written in different languages, all deployed on different machines. This is a bread and butter use case of LDAP, and pretty much every system can handle this out of the box. Glassfish and Tomcat can both readily validate against an LDAP server. So can Apache (Web server), Postgres (Database), Postfix (email), etc. etc.
So if you want simply a shared credential, you get that "for free", right now, by installing an LDAP server. LDAP is a bit of a different beast than something like a DBMS, but once you study it a little and "get it", it's really quite nice. OpenLDAP is a popular LDAP server, but I'm partial to ApacheDS.
The way to set that up in a Java EE container is to set up a "Realm". GF and Tomcat both have LDAP realms out of the box, I imagine the rest do to. But the nut there is that you need to use Java EE security to leverage the Realm.
See, the detail with a Java EE Realm is that it's an aspect of the CONTAINER, not the application. Just like a connection pool is a container resource that your application leverages. Most people want security to be a part of their application, where they feel they have more control over it.
That's all well and good until you start getting a bunch of different applications and everyone is configured differently and has separate user lists, and password policies, etc. etc.
LDAP can fix a lot of that, since you configure them all to use the same credential store.
The Realm fills that need on a Java EE server. Your application is configured to use a Realm provided by the container. If you have several applications, and a single Realm, then they all get to share the credentials within that Realm (regardless of the Realm type).
Realms can be anything: file based, db based, LDAP, etc. Realms also cluster if the container clusters (which can be handy).
The dark side of Java EE security, and why most apps avoid it is that, since, again, the Realm is part of the container, and not the application, it can be a little ungainly to use, and perhaps not offer the features you like in terms of user management, password policies, etc.
But the bright side of Java EE security is that once you're under its umbrella, you can leverage the credential all over in your code easily. A person logs in to the web site, and that credential can be used there in the web app, or automatically propagated back to the EJB tier (ever a remote EJB tier), and the information is always handy.
You can point your web apps at a realm, you EJBs, your web services. They all leverage the same pieces.
In order to get kind of the best of both worlds is to leverage container specific mechanisms to access the containers security. This is the other dark side of Java EE security.
Things like Realms, and direct access to container security are not portable across containers. GF does it different than Tomcat does it different from WebLogic. It's all really close, but differs in details so your code won't port seamlessly.
The bright side is for in house apps, most folks simply leverage the container they have, put a reasonable abstraction around the container dependent code, and call it day noting that yes, they will have to port this if and when they move to a different container. But, in practice. much like a database, once a container platform is chosen, folks tend to snuggle in tight and stick with it.
Finally, Servlet 3.0 (In GF3 and Tomcat 7) standardizes more of the programmatic login issues to make them more portable across containers, but the underlying concepts are the same.
Now, SSO.
SSO is a different beast. But, out the gate, both GF and Tomcat support SSO for web apps. This lets you log in to one web app and have be able to easily access others without having to log in to them. But the SSO is a little bit limited since it relies more heavily on the container security and its lifecycle, rather than a more flexible one under the control of the application. Mind, not just on Realms (that's a given), but on the actual container based FORM login, rather than a custom programmatic login. FORM login is not spectacular, but it's functional and it works. Implement a Realm, deploy your apps to a single instance of Tomcat or GF (or a cluster in GF 3.1), and you get SSO for free, so if that's important, it's kind of nice really. It's usability is fine for back office apps, but not perhaps the public internet.
If you want a more sophisticated SSO solution, then you need look at custom implementations. OpenSSO is one of those, and it relies on SAML and the SAML web profile. However, there are others. There's CAS, Atlassian Cloud, Kerberos, and OAuth as well. Those are all using different protocols than SAML. If you want to stick with SAML you can also look at Shibboleth, or even SimpleSAML (SimpleSAML is a PHP server that acts as a SAML Identity Provider, among other things, but you still need a Service Provider within your applications).
Whatever protocol you choose, the process is basically the same (detailed here -- Cross Domain Login - How to login a user automatically when transferred from one domain to another).
But the devil is in the details. And, boy, are there devils.
All of these systems are complicated. SSO is complicated. For example, now that you have Single Sign On, what about Single Sign Out? What about Single Time Out? What about credential changes while users are logged in? What about an STS (Secure Token Service) for your Web Services? (STS offers a similar delegated authentication mechanism for web services.)
SAML introduces you to a whole lot of new vocabulary, and a lot of configuration. It's not readily picked up since the documentation isn't stellar and relies a lot on standards documents which talk to a higher level of generic things, and not to you and your application specifically.
If you don't need really need SSO, then you'll likely be content with something like a central LDAP store and going on from there.
All that said, as an example, our applications support both a DB and LDAP backend. They use Glassfish, and Java EE security. We completely control the user experience. We also support SSO via SAML (we wrote our own Identity and Service Providers), and we have both shared credentials via LDAP and SSO across Java and other applications, using our code and third party code. The bright side is this is all standards based. The dark side is that standards are communicated in english, and english is subject to interpretation.
I say this simply to say it can be done. I have also written ad hoc, back of the napkin SSO implementations, both same domain and cross domain (same domain is simple with a shared cookie) using simple Servlet Filters. Password policies, password recovery, keep alive timers, multiple window timeout and session management (that's a hoot), roles, privileges, etc. etc. Been there, done that.
Also, I would be remiss to not mention Spring and Spring Security which offers all of this on top of Spring. I have not used it (I'm not a Spring person), but those folks do know what they are doing so it's worth looking at.
Please note that "Is there a way to make OpenSSO/OpenAM talk to Database for its authentication and authorization?" is phrased wrong. The question details and answers only deal with the authorization aspect. OpenAM works great with a MySQL database of users and passwords (authentication), and can use it's hidden/embedded LDAP server for storing policies and other settings.
It sounds like you still need to flesh out your security model, but you will likely find you do not need something like OpenAM at all, and can just use container/framework provided security.
This list might provide a good starting point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_single_sign-on_implementations
with JOSSO and Shibboleth springing to mind.
OpenAM has two separate stores, a User Store, where users and all the accompanying properties are stored and a Configuration Store, which holds the configuration. There is a database User Store, which is available in OpenAM however I have never tried it. The SO question you were pointing to was referring primarily to the config store, which while LDAP only, is embedded in OpenAM (so doesn't require direct management).
Personally I am a fan of Tomcat over Glassfish, as it is a fast and light Servlet container, without all the associated bloat which goes with a full J2EE container.
You can use OpenAm with RDBMs. I am using JBDC based user store in OpenAm
OpenAM seems to have the ability to plug in your own authentication module.
Presumably, you can make your DB calls from within your extentsion of the AMLoginModule.
I have successfully build a custom user repository for OpenAm. Since this question have not been active for a while and because it would be too long to describe in details here how to do it, I will just give a few hints. If you need help on specifics, fell free to ask me.
Your basic entry point needs to extends com.sun.identity.idm.IdRepo.
You need to register your custom repository using ssoadm.jsp?cmd=add-sub-schema.
From this point, your repository type will be listed among the other types when you create a data store for a realm.
Good luck !
I am looking to add single sign on (SSO) to one of my web applications. I don't want anything heavy at the moment, I just want to know the userId of the logged in user, without the need for them to enter a username.
The web app is an internal application, so I can guarantee they are coming from a Windows PC etc.
I have looked at jCIFS, but this doesn't seem to be supported any more, and recommends a commercial product.
I have also looked at WAFFLE, but I am building SSO for a playframework application, which does not use a Servlet stack, so I can't make use of the SecurityFilter. I have tried to make sense of the WindowsLoginModule, but couldn't really understand what I had to do to implement it.
Is it possible to just get the username from the HTTP header, or does it require some negotiation first before it will post the header?
You want the windows user to automagically login to your intranet webapp. So the user accounts would sit in an active directory and the usual microsoft way would be to use a protocol like NTML oder Kerberos. Applications are generally advised not to use NTLM, although there are enterprises still using NTML (and jCIFS) for SSO.
A quick search on Kerberos and Java showed this article. It seems to depend on the Java EE stack (JAAS).
For a more stripped down approach: Usually, you cannot sent the username in a http request in a portable way. With ActivX you could do:
var wshshell=new ActiveXObject("wscript.shell");
var username=wshshell.ExpandEnvironmentStrings("%username%");
On the server side, you can parse the http header and extract the username with your technology of choice.
Well, security doesn't matter in your playframework application?
Why don't you use long-living cookies?
Hope it helps!
In an intranet context with ActiveDirectory and workstations registered in the domain, the HTTP SPNEGO Negotiation support is the best option. But it requires specific skills around ActiveDirectory and Java Kerberos implementation.
Spring Security provides implementation and documentation to set it up. But Secure.Security is not designed to support token-based authentication like HTTP Negotiation. So using Spring Security will require a specific integration module.
Other options are OpenID and shibboleth but both requires a dedicated server, which can be configured to do SPNEGO itself. Thanks to available Play modules, integration in your application will be easier.
The only way to get the username in an HTTP header without client-side complex and unsecure/unreliable tweaks is to use an authentication proxy between browsers and your application server. Most of these proxies also support Kerberos SPNEGO as authentication mean.
Non-heavy answer
It sounds like it should be possible to get your ops team to implement a Group Policy which will send the logged-in username down the wire as an HTTP Header.
Otherwise, you're correct in your assumption that there is some sort of negotiation "dance" between IE and your server. See here. Perhaps you can fake this dance in your Play code.
Heavy answer
I know jCIFS and this example uses servlets and filters, but the important bits of code can be extracted and a custom Play Authenticator can be built (I can paste a Scala example override of play.api.mvc.Security.Authenticated , but your answer is tagged Java). You only need the request headers (not body) so it should be doable in an authenticator.
PS jCIFS seems to have had an update since your post, so I'm presuming you'd reconsider using hacking it. I'm wary of unmaintained libraries too, but sometimes they just reach a maturity and stability which alleviates the need for any more updates.
Active Directory uses Kerberos, so all logged in users should have a kerberos ticket.
A fast google found this:
https://blogs.oracle.com/wyllys/entry/kerberos_web_authentiation_with_apache
If you want the windows logon details, I think it's your only option.
You can try to use Shiro for enabling SSO in your application.
Shiro id independent of the servlets and since your framework does not support Servlets you can very easily go for Shiro.
You can create a Realm where you define the hashPassword.
You can configure the username and the hashPassword and ask the shiro to authenticate your user with the hashPassword.
You will then assign role for the user which will serve your purpose of SSO.
You can authenticate user for more than one application and hence when user logs into another application the shiro has already authenticated you and hence it will straight away log you inside the application..
You can go through the shiro documentation(exhaustive and you should be able to configure it on first go) from the following link:-
http://shiro.apache.org/
It provides you many out of the box functionality for authenticating and authorization along with security and Cryptography modules.
The username isn't sent in the header. Even if it was this shouldn't be relied upon as a savvy user could fake the values.
If NTLM would be a valid option for you Jespa might be a good alternative to JCIFS. Jespa (unlike JCIFS) supports NTLM v2, among other things. The limited version of it (up to 25 users) is free.
You can always get any header from filter. See javadoc for HttpServletRequest.
I need to implement single sign-on in my java web application which can achieve the following features:
All the computer joined in my domain smb.local , after user login in the computer, and type http://localhost:8080, my application know to use the current logined user to login into my web application.
So what protocal should I implement ? Or any reference ?
Thanks very much !
If you want to "automatically" extract the user's Windows credentials, one option (maybe the only one?) is NTLM. Once you've actually got the credentials, you'll need to check them against the authoritative source - Active Directory exposes details as LDAP, so most security frameworks would be able to cope with this.
I've done such a thing a few years ago with Spring Security, including deriving privileges based on Windows group membership, and it worked very well.
Recently I worked with CAS from Jasig, you can also check OpenSSO or Josso to have a SSO. From there, you'll find the documentation of each project and how to integrate it in your application.
For the automatic connection "as long as your logged on the computer", I'm not sure that's even possible. If it is you'll certainly need a specific browser (and some plugins for this browser).
Is the authentication centralized anywhere (LDAP, for example)?