I use log4j for logging and i want to print all logger.debug statements in a particular class / selected package.
i set the cfg as below>
log4j.category.my.pkg=info
log4j.category.my.pkg.ab.class1=debug
but still only info messages are shown..
is this not the right way ?
Instead of using 'category' use 'logger'. Hence, these level are configured for entire log4j, and does not depend on appender, etc.
Following change works:
log4j.logger.my.pkg=info
log4j.logger.my.pkg.ab.class1=debug
Copying from my current log4j.properties:
log4j.logger.org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl=warn
log4j.logger.org.hibernate.sql=info
Related
I'm using the SyslogAppender in my java application and I'm trying to add a custom field to the resulting log. How can I add an additional field to my log4j.properties?
My current log4j.properties (the last line shows what I want to achieve):
log4j.appender.SYSLOG=org.apache.log4j.net.SyslogAppender
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.threshold=INFO
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.syslogHost=localhost
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.facility=LOCAL4
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.header=true
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.layout.conversionPattern=my-app: %m%n
log4j.appender.SYSLOG.applicationName=${STACKNAME}
The ${STACKNAME} is a system property configured by the deployment job, depending on the environment (e.g. prod, test, dev).
From this answer I get the answer: add the lines
log4j.appender.graylog2.additionalFields={'filed_name': 'field_value', 'field2_name': 'field2_value'}
log4j.appender.graylog2.addExtendedInformation=true
to add field_name and field2_name with values field_value and field2_value. The property addExtendedInformation=true indicates Graylog to add those fields to all log entries.
I have a scenario where I have a separate custom level defined XYZLogLevel for logging and I have 2 rolling file appenders where 2nd appender is specifically reserved to log log messages from XYZLogLevel. However the logs are going in both the files which is undesirable.
Note:-
Logs are not package specific, so adding additivity for package wont
work.
Everything has to be done through log4j.properties file.
Adding LevelRangeFilter to first appender partially resolves it, but
when I add 3rd appender for another custom level, then I again see
duplication in 2nd and 3rd appender.
log4j.rootCategory=ERROR, F, XYZLOG, LMNLOG
log4j.appender.F=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.F.File=f_log.log
log4j.appender.F.MaxFileSize=5MB
log4j.appender.F.MaxBackupIndex=10
log4j.appender.F.layout = org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.F.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS} %c{1} [%p] %m%n
log4j.appender.XYZLOG=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.File=xyz_reporting.log
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.threshold=XYZLOG#com.services.domain.xyzlogs.XYZLogLevel
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.filter.a=org.apache.log4j.varia.LevelMatchFilter
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.filter.a.LevelToMatch=XYZLOG#com.services.domain.xyzlogs.XYZLogLevel
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.filter.a.AcceptOnMatch=true
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.MaxFileSize=100KB
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.MaxBackupIndex=10
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.XYZLOG.layout.ConversionPattern=%m%n
log4j.appender.LMNLOG=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.File=lmn_reporting.log
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.threshold=LMNLOG#com.services.domain.lmnlogs.LMNLogLevel
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.filter.a=org.apache.log4j.varia.LevelMatchFilter
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.filter.a.LevelToMatch=LMNLOG#com.services.domain.lmnlogs.LMNLogLevel
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.filter.a.AcceptOnMatch=true
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.MaxFileSize=100KB
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.MaxBackupIndex=10
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.LMNLOG.layout.ConversionPattern=%m%n
Maybe this can be solved through org.apache.log4j.varia.DenyAllFilter but somehow I was not able to configure that for properties file. I believe that functionality is only for XML configuration.
Its a very tricky sitution as I dont have the liberty to switch to XML configuration, any help on this would be appreciated guys.
Link and examples would be great as I understand them quickly.
I am answering my own question.
First you need to create a logger and set additivity as FALSE.
log4j.logger.XZYLOG=XZYLOG#XYZLOG#com.services.domain.xyzlogs.XYZLogLevel, XYZAPPENDER
log4j.additivity.XZYLOG=false
log4j.logger.LMNLOG=LMNLOG#XYZLOG#com.services.domain.lmnlogs.LMNLogLevel, LMNAPPENDER
log4j.additivity.LMNLOG=false
Then configure the appenders in following way.
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER.File=xyz_reporting.log
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER.threshold=XYZLOG#com.services.domain.xyzlogs.XYZLogLevel
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER.MaxFileSize=100KB
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER.MaxBackupIndex=10
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.XYZLOGAPPENDER.layout.ConversionPattern=%m%n
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER.File=lmn_reporting.log
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER.threshold=LMNLOG#com.services.domain.lmnlogs.LMNLogLevel
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER.MaxFileSize=100KB
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER.MaxBackupIndex=10
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.LMNLOGAPPENDER.layout.ConversionPattern=%m%n
You may or may not need the filter in this case.
Note: I cannot post company code here thats why I modified the solution.
This is to give you general idea how I have solved this problem.
I am trying to use LoggerHandler to log all incoming requests. I am using logback.xml to specify appenders. I am setting system property for logging.
System.setProperty("org.vertx.logger-delegate-factory-class-name",
"org.vertx.java.core.logging.impl.SLF4JLogDelegateFactory");
Still it is logging everything in console not in file.
This worked for me with Vert.x 3.4.1:
import static io.vertx.core.logging.LoggerFactory.LOGGER_DELEGATE_FACTORY_CLASS_NAME;
import io.vertx.core.logging.LoggerFactory;
// ...
setProperty (LOGGER_DELEGATE_FACTORY_CLASS_NAME, SLF4JLogDelegateFactory.class.getName ());
LoggerFactory.getLogger (LoggerFactory.class); // Required for Logback to work in Vertx
The key is to get a logger, which I guess initializes the Logging subsystem, the class that you use to get a Logger seems irrelevant as I tried with two different ones.
I run these lines as the first ones of the program in production code and in the tests to work properly in both contexts.
I was able to get it to work by setting the VM options as such:
-Dvertx.logger-delegate-factory-class-name=io.vertx.core.logging.Log4jLogDelegateFactory
Then in my log4j.properties, I had to add this:
log4j.category.io.vertx = TRACE
I know this question is getting a bit old, but the only way I was able to get the vertx LoggerHandler to not use JUL was to call LoggerFactory.initialise() after setting the system property as described in the question.
Even better, I set the property in my build.gradle, like so:
run {
systemProperty(
"vertx.logger-delegate-factory-class-name",
"io.vertx.core.logging.SLF4JLogDelegateFactory"
)
args = ['run', mainVerticleName, "--redeploy=$watchForChange", "--launcher-class=$mainClassName", "--on-redeploy=$doOnChange",
"-Dvertx.logger-delegate-factory-class-name=io.vertx.core.logging.SLF4JLogDelegateFactory" ]
}
And then at the very top of my MainVerticle::start I have:
LoggerFactory.initialise()
And, boom. Everything is now formatted correctly, including all the startup output.
Some logging levels appear to be broke?
I run a Java web start (which I will begin to call JWS from now on) application straight from a GlassFish 3.1.2.2 instance. The client has a static logger like so:
private final static Logger LOGGER;
static {
LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(App.class.getName());
// Not sure how one externalize this setting or even if we want to:
LOGGER.setLevel(Level.FINER);
}
In the main method, I begin my logic with some simple testing of the logging feature:
alert("isLoggable() INFO? " + LOGGER.isLoggable(Level.INFO)); // Prints TRUE!
alert("isLoggable() FINE? " + LOGGER.isLoggable(Level.FINE)); // ..TRUE
alert("isLoggable() FINER? " + LOGGER.isLoggable(Level.FINER)); // ..TRUE
alert("isLoggable() FINEST? " + LOGGER.isLoggable(Level.FINEST)); // ..FALSE
My alert methods will display a JOptionPane dialog box for "true GUI logging". Anyways, you see the printouts in my comments I added to the code snippet. As expected, the logger is enabled for levels INFO, FINE and FINER but not FINEST.
After my alert methods, I type:
// Info
LOGGER.info("Level.INFO");
LOGGER.log(Level.INFO, "Level.INFO");
// Fine
LOGGER.fine("Level.FINE");
LOGGER.log(Level.FINE, "Level.FINE");
// Finer
LOGGER.finer("Level.FINER");
LOGGER.log(Level.FINER, "Level.FINER");
LOGGER.entering("", "Level.FINER", args); // <-- Uses Level.FINER!
// Finest
LOGGER.finest("Level.FINEST");
LOGGER.log(Level.FINEST, "Level.FINEST");
I go to my Java console and click on the tab "Advanced", then I tick "Enable logging". Okay let's start the application. Guess what happens? Only Level.INFO prints! Here's my proof (look at the bottom):
I've done my best to google for log files on my computer and see if not Level.FINE and Level.FINER end up somewhere on the file system. However, I cannot find the log messages anywhere.
Summary of Questions
Why does it appear that logging of Level.FINE and Level.FINER does not work in the example provided?
I set the logging level in my static initializing block, but I'd sure like to externalize this setting to a configuration file of some sort, perhaps packaged together with the EAR file I deploy on GlassFish. Or why not manually write in some property in the JNLP file we download from the server. Is this possible somehow?
Solution for problem no 1.
After doing a little bit more reading on the topic, I concluded that a logger in Java uses a handler to publish his logs. And this handler in his turn has his own set of "walls" for what levels he handles. But this handler need not be attached directly to our logger! You see loggers are organized in a hierarchical namespace and a child logger may inherit his parents handlers. If so, then By default a Logger will log any output messages to its parent's handlers, and so on recursively up the tree (see Java Logging Overview - Oracle).
I ain't saying I get the full picture just yet, and I sure didn't find any quotes about how all of this relates to a Java Web Start application. Surely there has to be some differences. Anyways, I did manage to write together this static initializing block that solves my immediate problem:
static {
LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(App.class.getName());
/*
* This logic can be externalized. See the next solution!
*/
// DEPRECATED: LOGGER.setLevel(Level.FINER);
if (LOGGER.getUseParentHandlers())
LOGGER.getParent().getHandlers()[0].setLevel(Level.FINER);
else
LOGGER.setLevel(Level.FINER);
}
Solution for problem no 2.
The LogManager API docs provided much needed information for the following solution. In a subdirectory of your JRE installation, there is a subdirectory called "lib" and in there you shall find a "logging.properties" file. This is the full path to my file on my Windows machine:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\lib\logging.properties
In here you can change a lot of flavors. One cool thing you could do is to change the global logging level. In my file, this was done on row 29 (why do we see only a dot in front of the "level"? The root-parent of all loggers is called ""!). That will produce a hole lot of output; on my machine I received about one thousand log messages per second. Thus changing the global level isn't even plausible enough to be considered an option. Instead, add a new row where you specify the level of your logger. In my case, I added this row:
martinandersson.com.malivechat.app.App.level = FINER
However, chances are you still won't see any results. In solution no 1, I talked about how loggers are connected to handlers. The default handler is specified in logging.properties, most likely on row 18. Here's how my line reads:
handlers= java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
Also previously, I talked about how these handlers in their turn use levels for what should trouble their mind. So, find the line that reads something like this (should now be on row 44?):
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = INFO
..and in my case I swapped "INFO" to "FINER". Problem solved.
But!
My original inquiry into this matter still hasn't provided an answer how one can set these properties closer in par with the application deployment. More specifically, I would like to attach these properties in a separate file, bundled with the application EAR file I deploy on GlassFish or something like that. Do you have more information? Please share!
Situation: I have this log4j logger:
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(ThisClassName.class);
And am trying to set it programatically through:
Logger.getLogger(ThisClassName.class).setLevel(Level.DEBUG);
Still, DEBUG level prints are swalloed (while INFO prints are printed successfully).
Even this bit has no effect: Logger.getRootLogger().setLevel(Level.DEBUG);
Calling logger.debug("foo") reaches Category.forcedLog() and ConsoleAppender.doAppend(), and then fails (quits) at:
if(!isAsSevereAsThreshold(event.getLevel()))
Any idea why this is happening?
Your appender is configured with a threshold greater than debug, so while the logger doesn't ignore the entries, your appender doesn't record it. You need to configure the threshold of your ConsoleAppender to be DEBUG as well, either through your config file or programatically:
((ConsoleAppender)someLogger.getAppender("CONSOLE")).setThreshold(Level.DEBUG);
Config files are usually the more elegant solution for this sort of thing.
Edit: Note that apparently, any subclass of AppenderSkeleton (including ConsoleAppender) shouldn't have a threshold filter set by default. So it's likely that somewhere in your configuration you're actually manually assigning a threshold ( > Debug) to that appender, as #justkt hints.