so suppose I have a java package....
it's got the main class with the main method
and then it's got a whole bunch of other classes.....
my question is, is it possible to get the args that was passed into the main method from these other classes that are not part of the main class but in the same package...
No, not portably, there may be some trickery based on the JVM implementation but I've never seen it, and it would be a very bad idea to rely on it even if it existed.
If you want those values elsewhere, the main function needs to make them available somehow.
An easy way to do this (not necessarily the best way) is to simply store away the strings as the first thing in main and provide a means for getting at them:
Scratch2.java:
public class Scratch2 {
// Arguments and accessor for them.
private static String[] savedArgs;
public static String[] getArgs() {
return savedArgs;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Save them away for later.
savedArgs = args;
// Test that other classes can get them.
CmdLineArgs cla = new CmdLineArgs();
cla.printArgs();
}
}
CmdLineArgs.java:
public class CmdLineArgs {
public void printArgs() {
String[] args = Scratch2.getArgs();
System.out.println ("Arg count is [" + args.length + "]");
for (int i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
System.out.println ("Arg[" + i + "] is [" + args[i] + "]");
}
}
}
And, when run with the arguments a b c, this outputs:
Arg count is [3]
Arg[0] is [a]
Arg[1] is [b]
Arg[2] is [c]
The system-properties on some (?) JRE-implementations provide the system-property "sun.java.command" to get the programm-name and parameters that were used to start the program. Like "myjar.jar param1 param2 ...".
While this value doesn't even belong to the set of properties that are mentioned in the documentation, it is present in both Oracle-JRE v1.8 and OpenJRE v1.8 (tested).
I couldn't find any documentation whether this value is supported by default though (best I could find was the list in the System#getProperties() docs). Any clarification on this would be welcome. Handle with care!!!
If you don't care about OS portability, read /proc/self/cmdline or the equivalent for your OS.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procfs
As paxdiablo said, your main class would have to store these parameters and then either distribute or make available to needed ones. Often a good idea would be to let another class do the parsing of these parameters, and provide an object of this class instead of the raw command line to whoever needs it.
I'm kind of a newb at this, but you should be able to store the string[] args to a private instance variable, then make an accessor method for it.
E.g.,
public class test {
private String[] myArgs = new String[10];
public static void main(String[] args) {
myArgs = args;
}
public String[] getArgs() {
return myArgs;
}
}
Not sure if it will work, but that's the idea.
Related
I am writing an administrator class that all other classes I am writing are meant to inherit from. In this case I want the classes to inherit a main method, and I am planning on implementing a factory as well. There are a few sysouts that I have to write that include various class names such as charcount, linecount and the such. For this I need to be able to get the current class name, since this method will be inherited by multiple classes. Is there a way to do this in java? You can find an example of the sysout I am looking to do below:
System.out.println("Usage: className <src>\n");
Thank you all in advance, any help is appreciated!
edit:
Hey guys!
Very sorry I wasnt clear before, I'll show the entire code below and try to further explain my idea. So what I am doing is essentially making a main method that checks to see if a file exists, and if the file exists, it will try to execute a certain function (All this will be in the command line).I am practicing factory design patterns (something I've never done before). I will use the execute part of the main method to call on some factory (not yet made) to create objects of subclasses of administrator and return things like charcount in a file and linecount in a file. The above question refers to one part of this main method that will print the usage of the subclass. So for example, I will have charcount inherit from administrator because the process of checking the file and is in the main method of administrator, however when I print the usage message, I dont want it to print "Usage: Administrator ", but "Usage: charcount ". I hope that clears things up, and sorry again for how badly I explained it above, you can find what I have so far as code below:
public class Administrator
{
private static File srcFile = null;
private static String srcFilename = "<srcFilename>";
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException
{
//check the command line
if(args.length != 1)
{
System.out.println("Usage: charcount <src>\n");
return;
}
// Check if arguments are valid, if the srcFile exists, and if can create the dstFile.
if (args[0] != null)
{
//check <src>
srcFilename = args[0];
System.out.println( ": srcFilename '" + srcFilename + "'");
srcFile = new File(srcFilename);
if(!srcFile.canRead())
{
System.out.println("charcount: cannot open srcFile '" + srcFilename + "'");
return;
}
}
else
{
System.out.println("charcount: [OK] srcFilename = '" + srcFilename + "'");
}
}
public static int execute() {return 0;}
}
You can do something like this:
System.out.println("Class name: " + getClass().getName());
Which will return foo.bar.Baz (assuming your class is named Baz and in package foo.bar)
Or you can
System.out.println("Class name: " + getClass().getSimpleName());
Which will simply return 'Foo'
You might find this related question helpful: What is the difference between canonical name, simple name and class name in Java Class?
Edit: The question asks about doing this from the "main" method, which could be understood as public static void main(String[] args) or as the primary method in a given class hierarchy. Since the question goes on to discuss the method being inherited by multiple classes, I understood "main" as "primary". This answer wouldn't work from public static void main(String[] args) because getClass() is an instance method and can't be invoked from a static context.
Java Class class has some useful methods. You can use getClass().getSimpleName(). at runtime this method called based on object's type.
Try using this methods:
this.getClass().getCanonicalName() or this.getClass().getSimpleName().
If it's an anonymous class, you should use this.getClass().getSuperclass().getName()
I am working on a homework assignment that takes input from a .csv file and will prompt the user for different questions pertaining to the information contained within (crime statistics).
My code is as follows and it's still really early so I just have some placeholder variables in there as I have been wracking my head trying to figure out the best approach to this problem.
import java.io.*;
public class USCrimeArray {
String crimeArray[][] = new String[21][20];
public void createCrimeArray() throws Exception{
String crimeArrayInputString;
int crimeArrayRowValue = -1;
try (BufferedReader crimeArrayInput = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("C:/Users/Joey/Documents/Crime.csv"))) {
while ((crimeArrayInputString = crimeArrayInput.readLine()) != null) {
crimeArrayRowValue++;
crimeArray[crimeArrayRowValue] = crimeArrayInputString.split(",");
}
} catch (IOException io) {
io.getMessage();
}
}
public USCrimeArray(){
String[][] thisArray = crimeArray.clone();
}
public String[][] getCrimeArray(){
return crimeArray.clone();
}
}
This is the code for my first class and if I do a deepToString inside of createCrimeArray I get the information back that I want. The constructor for USCrimeArray hasn't really been thought out yet my main question is how to write the information to the crimeArray[][] so that I can carry it back over to other classes.
Once again this test main hasn't been thought out too far because I am still struggling with why my method is not writing over the crimeArray[][] with the while loop and it is as follows:
import java.util.Arrays;
public class USCrimeClass {
public static void main(String[] args) {
USCrimeArray crimeArray = new USCrimeArray();
String[][] test = crimeArray.getCrimeArray();
System.out.println(Arrays.deepToString(test));
}
}
I know there's a lot I'm doing wrong here, but this is the end result so far after having altered everything over and over again and not making any progress. The result of the system out in this is obviously just a 21x20 array of null elements. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
You need to call createCrimeArray() in USCrimeClass
public class USCrimeClass {
public static void main(String[] args) {
USCrimeArray crimeArray = new USCrimeArray();
crimeArray.createCrimeArray();
String[][] test = crimeArray.getCrimeArray();
System.out.println(Arrays.deepToString(test));
}
}
Also,
in the constructor of USCrimeArray you are clonning the array into a local variable thisArray but never use it. this is redundant and can be safely removed.
in getCrimeArray() you are returning a clone of the array. this is not needed (unless you want to keep USCrimeArray immutable). you can just return the array itself
Instance variables
instance variables are non static class level variables (much like crimeArray).
One can consider instance variables as serving two purposes:
"details" of the problem domain of the class. For example Person class will have instance variables such as firstName and lastName that are details of one person.
"configuration" variables holding information related to the technological environment and not pertaining to the problem domain of the class. For example, one sometimes might find a class with a boolean deleted instance variable that signifies a "soft deleted" instance that is not to be presented to the user or included in calculations. the purpose behind this is to support undo of deletion.
so crimeArray is of category details of USCrimeArray. common best practice is to initialise instance variables in the class constructor, so by the time you finish creating a new instance, you have one that has full and valid details. So I would move all of the code of createCrimeArray() into the constructor.
If you need to modify an instance variable after it was initialised, then a "setter" method can be used. these have a standardized signature: public void setCrimeArray(crimeArray[][]). having a standardized signature allows your class to be used by frameworks and libraries that add functionality. For example, storing the data in a relational database, sending/recieving the data over the internet, etc.
Now, I see that the external input that is used to populate the array comes from a file. The way it is coded now, USCrimeArray can only read one specific file from predetermined file syatem location. a more flexible way would be for the class to receive the specification for external input as an argument:
public USCrimeArray(String filename) {
...
try (BufferedReader crimeArrayInput = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(filename))) {
...
}
now the same class can be used to process an array from different files.
now you can even make the file name an argument of the java program:
public class USCrimeClass {
public static void main(String[] args) {
USCrimeArray crimeArray = new USCrimeArray(arg[0]);
System.out.println(Arrays.deepToString(test));
}
}
now the same java program can process different files without need for recompile.
UPDATE: After getting an unexpected-in-a-good-way answer, I've added some context to the bottom of this question, stating exactly how I'll be using these string-function-calls.
I need to translate a string such as
my.package.ClassName#functionName(1, "a string value", true)
into a reflective call to that function. Getting the package, class, and function name is not a problem. I have started rolling my own solution for parsing the parameter list, and determining the type of each and returning an appropriate object.
(I'm limiting the universe of types to the eight primitives, plus string. null would be considered a string, and commas and double-quotes must be strictly escaped with some simple marker, such as __DBL_QT__, to avoid complications with unescaping and splitting on the comma.)
I am not asking how to do this via string-parsing, as I understand how. It's just a lot of work and I'm hoping there's a solution already out there. Unfortunately it's such generic terminology, I'm getting nowhere with searching.
I understand asking for an external existing library is off topic for SO. I'm just hoping to get some feedback before it's shutdown, or even a suggestion on better search terms. Or perhaps, there is a completely different approach that might be suggested...
Thank you.
Context:
Each function call is found within a function's JavaDoc block, and represents a piece of example code--either its source code or its System.out output--which will be displayed in that spot.
The parameters are for customizing its display, such as
indentation,
eliminating irrelevant parts (like the license-block), and
for JavaDoc-linking the most important functions.
This customization is mostly for the source-code presentation, but may also be applied to its output.
(The first parameter is always an Appendable, which will do the actual outputting.)
The user needs to be be able to call any function, which in many cases will be a private-static function located directly below the JavaDoc-ed function itself.
The application I'm writing will read in the source-code file (the one containing the JavaDoc blocks, in which these string-function-calls exist), and create a duplicate of the *.java file, which will subsequently processed by javadoc.
So for every piece of example code, there will be likely two, and possibly more of these string-function-calls. There may be more, because I may want to show different slices of the same example, in different contexts--perhaps the whole example in the overall class JavaDoc block, and snippets from it in the relevant functions in that class.
I have already written the process that parses the source code (the source code containing the JavaDoc blocks, which is separate from the one that reads the example-code), and re-outputs its source-code blindly with insert example-code here and insert example-code-output here markers.
I'm now at the point where I have this string-function-call in an InsertExampleCode object, in a string-field. Now I need to do as described at the top of this question. Figure out which function they want to invoke, and do so.
Change the # to a dot (.), write a class definition around it so that you have a valid Java source file, include tools.jar in your classpath and invoke com.sun.tools.javac.Main.
Create your own instance of a ClassLoader to load the compiled class, and run it (make it implement a useful interface, such as java.util.concurrent.Callable so that you can get the result of the invocation easily)
That should do the trick.
The class I created for this, called com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.simplesig.SimpleMethodSignature, is a significant piece of Codelet, used to translate the "customizer" portion of each taglet, which is a function that customizes the taglet's output.
(Installation instructions. The only jars that must be in your classpath are codelet and xbnjava.)
Example string signatures, in taglets:
{#.codelet.and.out com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.examples.adder.AdderDemo%eliminateCommentBlocksAndPackageDecl()}
The customizer portion is everything following the percent sign (%). This customizer contains only the function name and empty parameters. This implies that the function must exist in one of a few, strictly-specified, set of classes.
{#.codelet.and.out com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.examples.adder.AdderDemo%lineRange(1, false, "Adder adder", 2, false, "println(adder.getSum())", "^ ")}
This specifies parameters as well, which are, by design, "simple"--either non-null strings, or a primitive type.
{#.codelet.and.out com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.examples.adder.AdderDemo%com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.examples.LineRangeWithLinksCompact#adderDemo_lineSnippetWithLinks()}
Specifies the explicit package and class in which the function exists.
Because of the nature of these taglets and how the string-signatures are implemented, I decided to stick with direct string parsing instead of dynamic compilation.
Two example uses of SimpleMethodSignature:
In this first example, the full signature (the package, class, and function name, including all its parameters) are specified in the string.
import com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.simplesig.SimpleMethodSignature;
import com.github.xbn.lang.reflect.InvokeMethodWithRtx;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
public class SimpleMethodSigNoDefaults {
public static final void main(String[] ignored) {
String strSig = "com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.examples.simplesig." +
"SimpleMethodSigNoDefaults#getStringForBoolInt(false, 3)";
SimpleMethodSignature simpleSig = null;
try {
simpleSig = SimpleMethodSignature.newFromStringAndDefaults(
String.class, strSig, null, null,
null); //debug (on=System.out, off=null)
} catch(ClassNotFoundException cnfx) {
throw new RuntimeException(cnfx);
}
Method m = null;
try {
m = simpleSig.getMethod();
} catch(NoSuchMethodException nsmx) {
throw new RuntimeException(nsmx);
}
m.setAccessible(true);
Object returnValue = new InvokeMethodWithRtx(m).sstatic().
parameters(simpleSig.getParamValueObjectList().toArray()).invokeGetReturnValue();
System.out.println(returnValue);
}
public static final String getStringForBoolInt(Boolean b, Integer i) {
return "b=" + b + ", i=" + i;
}
}
Output:
b=false, i=3
This second example demonstrates a string signature in which the (package and) class name are not specified. The potential classes, one in which the function must exist, are provided directly.
import com.github.aliteralmind.codelet.simplesig.SimpleMethodSignature;
import com.github.xbn.lang.reflect.InvokeMethodWithRtx;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
public class SimpleMethodSigWithClassDefaults {
public static final void main(String[] ignored) {
String strSig = "getStringForBoolInt(false, 3)";
SimpleMethodSignature simpleSig = null;
try {
simpleSig = SimpleMethodSignature.newFromStringAndDefaults(
String.class, strSig, null,
new Class[]{Object.class, SimpleMethodSigWithClassDefaults.class, SimpleMethodSignature.class},
null); //debug (on=System.out, off=null)
} catch(ClassNotFoundException cnfx) {
throw new RuntimeException(cnfx);
}
Method m = null;
try {
m = simpleSig.getMethod();
} catch(NoSuchMethodException nsmx) {
throw new RuntimeException(nsmx);
}
m.setAccessible(true);
Object returnValue = new InvokeMethodWithRtx(m).sstatic().
parameters(simpleSig.getParamValueObjectList().toArray()).invokeGetReturnValue();
System.out.println(returnValue);
}
public static final String getStringForBoolInt(Boolean b, Integer i) {
return "b=" + b + ", i=" + i;
}
}
Output:
b=false, i=3
This question already has answers here:
How to get the name of the calling class in Java?
(13 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I want to get the caller class of the method, i.e.
class foo{
bar();
}
In the method bar, I need to get the class name foo, and I found this method:
Class clazz = sun.reflect.Reflection.getCallerClass(1);
However, even though getCallerClass is public, when I try to call it Eclipse says:
Access restriction: The method getCallerClass() from the type
Reflection is not accessible due to restriction on required library
C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\lib\rt.jar
Are there any other choices?
You can generate a stack trace and use the informations in the StackTraceElements.
For example an utility class can return you the calling class name :
public class KDebug {
public static String getCallerClassName() {
StackTraceElement[] stElements = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
for (int i=1; i<stElements.length; i++) {
StackTraceElement ste = stElements[i];
if (!ste.getClassName().equals(KDebug.class.getName()) && ste.getClassName().indexOf("java.lang.Thread")!=0) {
return ste.getClassName();
}
}
return null;
}
}
If you call KDebug.getCallerClassName() from bar(), you'll get "foo".
Now supposing you want to know the class of the method calling bar (which is more interesting and maybe what you really wanted). You could use this method :
public static String getCallerCallerClassName() {
StackTraceElement[] stElements = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
String callerClassName = null;
for (int i=1; i<stElements.length; i++) {
StackTraceElement ste = stElements[i];
if (!ste.getClassName().equals(KDebug.class.getName())&& ste.getClassName().indexOf("java.lang.Thread")!=0) {
if (callerClassName==null) {
callerClassName = ste.getClassName();
} else if (!callerClassName.equals(ste.getClassName())) {
return ste.getClassName();
}
}
}
return null;
}
Is that for debugging ? If not, there may be a better solution to your problem.
StackTrace
This Highly depends on what you are looking for... But this should get the class and method that called this method within this object directly.
index 0 = Thread
index 1 = this
index 2 = direct caller, can be self.
index 3 ... n = classes and methods that called each other to get to the index 2 and below.
For Class/Method/File name:
Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[2].getClassName();
Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[2].getMethodName();
Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[2].getFileName();
For Class:
Class.forName(Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[2].getClassName())
FYI: Class.forName() throws a ClassNotFoundException which is NOT runtime. Youll need try catch.
Also, if you are looking to ignore the calls within the class itself, you have to add some looping with logic to check for that particular thing.
Something like... (I have not tested this piece of code so beware)
StackTraceElement[] stes = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
for(int i=2;i<stes.length;i++)
if(!stes[i].getClassName().equals(this.getClass().getName()))
return stes[i].getClassName();
StackWalker
StackWalker StackFrame
Note that this is not an extensive guide but an example of the possibility.
Prints the Class of each StackFrame (by grabbing the Class reference)
StackWalker.getInstance(Option.RETAIN_CLASS_REFERENCE)
.forEach(frame -> System.out.println(frame.getDeclaringClass()));
Does the same thing but first collects the stream into a List.
Just for demonstration purposes.
StackWalker.getInstance(Option.RETAIN_CLASS_REFERENCE)
.walk(stream -> stream.collect(Collectors.toList()))
.forEach(frame -> System.out.println(frame.getDeclaringClass()));
To get caller/called class name use below code, it works fine for me.
String callerClassName = new Exception().getStackTrace()[1].getClassName();
String calleeClassName = new Exception().getStackTrace()[0].getClassName();
SecurityManager has a protected method getClassContext
By creating a utility class which extends SecurityManager, you can access this.
public class CallingClass extends SecurityManager {
public static final CallingClass INSTANCE = new CallingClass();
public Class[] getCallingClasses() {
return getClassContext();
}
}
Use CallingClass.INSTANCE.getCallingClasses() to retrieve the calling classes.
There is also a small library (disclaimer: mine) WhoCalled which exposes this information. It uses Reflection.getCallerClass when available, else falls back to SecurityManager.
I know this is an old question but I believed the asker wanted the class, not the class name. I wrote a little method that will get the actual class. It is sort of cheaty and may not always work, but sometimes when you need the actual class, you will have to use this method...
/**
* Get the caller class.
* #param level The level of the caller class.
* For example: If you are calling this class inside a method and you want to get the caller class of that method,
* you would use level 2. If you want the caller of that class, you would use level 3.
*
* Usually level 2 is the one you want.
* #return The caller class.
* #throws ClassNotFoundException We failed to find the caller class.
*/
public static Class getCallerClass(int level) throws ClassNotFoundException {
StackTraceElement[] stElements = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
String rawFQN = stElements[level+1].toString().split("\\(")[0];
return Class.forName(rawFQN.substring(0, rawFQN.lastIndexOf('.')));
}
This is the most efficient way to get just the callers class. Other approaches take an entire stack dump and only give you the class name.
However, this class in under sun.* which is really for internal use. This means that it may not work on other Java platforms or even other Java versions. You have to decide whether this is a problem or not.
The error message the OP is encountering is just an Eclipse feature. If you are willing to tie your code to a specific maker (and even version) of the JVM, you can effectively use method sun.reflect.Reflection.getCallerClass(). You can then compile the code outside of Eclipse or configure it not to consider this diagnostic an error.
The worse Eclipse configuration is to disable all occurrences of the error by:
Project Properties / Java Compiler / Errors/Warnings / Enable project specific settings set to checked / Deprecated and restrited API / Forbidden reference (access rules) set to Warning or Ignore.
The better Eclipse configuration is to disable a specific occurrence of the error by:
Project Properties / Java Build Path / Libraries / JRE System Library expand / Access rules: select / Edit... / Add... / Resolution: set to Discouraged or Accessible / Rule Pattern set to sun/reflect/Reflection.
Find below a simple example illustrating how to get class and method names.
public static void main(String args[])
{
callMe();
}
void callMe()
{
try
{
throw new Exception("Who called me?");
}
catch( Exception e )
{
System.out.println( "I was called by " +
e.getStackTrace()[1].getClassName() +
"." +
e.getStackTrace()[1].getMethodName() +
"()!" );
}
}
e has getClassName(), getFileName(), getLineNumber() and getMethodName()...
Since I currently have the same problem here is what I do:
I prefer com.sun.Reflection instead of stackTrace since a stack trace is only producing the name not the class (including the classloader) itself.
The method is deprecated but still around in Java 8 SDK.
// Method descriptor #124 (I)Ljava/lang/Class; (deprecated)
// Signature: (I)Ljava/lang/Class<*>;
#java.lang.Deprecated
public static native java.lang.Class getCallerClass(int arg0);
The method without int argument is not deprecated
// Method descriptor #122 ()Ljava/lang/Class;
// Signature: ()Ljava/lang/Class<*>;
#sun.reflect.CallerSensitive
public static native java.lang.Class getCallerClass();
Since I have to be platform independent bla bla including Security Restrictions, I just create a flexible method:
Check if com.sun.Reflection is available (security exceptions disable this mechanism)
If 1 is yes then get the method with int or no int argument.
If 2 is yes call it.
If 3. was never reached, I use the stack trace to return the name. I use a special result object that contains either the class or the string and this object tells exactly what it is and why.
[Summary]
I use stacktrace for backup and to bypass eclipse compiler warnings I use reflections. Works very good. Keeps the code clean, works like a charm and also states the problems involved correctly.
I use this for quite a long time and today I searched a related question so
i am using the following method to get the caller for a specific class from the stacktrace:
package test.log;
public class CallerClassTest {
public static void main(final String[] args) {
final Caller caller = new Caller(new Callee());
caller.execute();
}
private static class Caller {
private final Callee c;
public Caller(final Callee c) {
this.c = c;
}
void execute() {
c.call();
}
}
static class Callee {
void call() {
System.out.println(getCallerClassName(this.getClass()));
}
}
/**
* Searches the current threads stacktrace for the class that called the given class. Returns {#code null} if the
* calling class could not be found.
*
* #param clazz
* the class that has been called
*
* #return the caller that called the class or {#code null}
*/
public static String getCallerClassName(final Class<?> clazz) {
final StackTraceElement[] stackTrace = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
final String className = clazz.getName();
boolean classFound = false;
for (int i = 1; i < stackTrace.length; i++) {
final StackTraceElement element = stackTrace[i];
final String callerClassName = element.getClassName();
// check if class name is the requested class
if (callerClassName.equals(className)) classFound = true;
else if (classFound) return callerClassName;
}
return null;
}
}
I am really new to java (started learning 2 days ago). Sorry if this is a stupid question. I am trying to learn how to use rt.exec & similar methods so I tried to make a very simple program which runs calc.exe. This is the code:
public class main {
{
try {
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime() ;
Process p = rt.exec("calc.exe") ;
}
catch(Exception exc){/*handle exception*/}
}
}
I get the error " The value of local variable p is not used".
And if I try to compile this is what I get:
I think it's easy to fix but I don't know how. Would be nice if someone helped.
Well, the error "The value of local variable p is not used.", Is not actually an error. It's your IDE (Eclipse), warning you that you aren't actually reading that variable, so you aren't receiving any input from it.
And the other problem with your class is, you don't have a main method. Like this,
public class main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime() ;
Process p = rt.exec("calc.exe") ;
} catch(Exception exc){
/*handle exception*/
}
}
}
And by the way, you should always start a class name with a captial letter. So public class main, should actually be public class Main
You get that error because you don't have the main method that is used to start the java program:
public class main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime() ;
Process p = rt.exec("calc.exe") ; // here, eclipse is WARINING(so you can ignore it) you that that the variable p is never used(it's just a warning)
} catch(Exception exc) {
/*handle exception*/
// never do this, always put at least a System.out.println("some error here" + e); so you don't ignore a potential exception
}
}
I believe what you have is not an error but a warning; eclipse (and other IDEs/compilers) will tell you that, although you assigned a value to the variable p, you did not use it anywhere. It tells you this because this is sometimes an error; mostly when you assign a value to a variable, you later use that variable in some way.
You can eliminate the error by changing that particular statement to just
rt.exec("calc.exe")
since you are not required to assign a value from the call to exec.
There is no such thing as a stupid qiestion(only misplaced ones, in the worst case).
The "Editor does not contain a main type" refers to the fact that you have not defined a main method. All java programs require a main method, as such:
public static void main(String [] args){
<code>
}
This is where you must place your code.
The "Value not used" is just a warning; it tells you that your variable p only exists within the try-block. You can declare your p-variable before the try - that way, you can use it outside the try-scope(the scope of a variable refers to where it exists, in this case, only inside the try-block).
If you want to use your p, this is what you're after:
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Process p;
try {
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
p = rt.exec("calc.exe");
} catch(Exception exc) {/*handle exception*/}
}
}
[EDIT]: Note that it is part of the java coding convention to use Capital letters for the first letter of a class, e.g. Main.java(not main.java)
The use of the variable is not in issue here. That error appears because JVM needs a method with the signature to know where to start execution.
public static void main( String args[] ){ //TODO: Stuff here }
Introduce a method with this signature in your class, and it shall clear that error.
Alternatively, you may embed your code in a static block as below - but this method is not to be recommended.
static {
// TODO: Your code here
}
Error "The value of local variable p is not used" due to the fact that nowhere in the code, you do not use the variable p.
To remove the error - it is necessary to remove the variable "p".
To run the calculator, you must use the code:
public class MainClass {
public static void main(String args[]) throws IOException {
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("cmd /c calc.exe");
}
}
This and all other comments translated by Google Translate
you are not using main how can you compile please use main method.
Ans second one is use p local variable in your method.other wise declare p variable starting of method.