I defined a generator for a JPA class:
<sequence-generator name="MY_SEQ" allocation-size="-1"
sequence-name="MY_SEQ"
initial-value="100000000" />
There are cases where I already have an ID for an entity but when I insert the Entity the Id gets generated using the generator.
Is it possible to define a generator that will only generate an Id when one does not exist?
I am using Hibernate as a JPA Provider.
Thank you
I couldn't find a way to do this in JPA so I used Hibernate EJB3 event listeners. I over rode the saveWithGeneratedId to use reflection to check the entity for an #Id annotation and then to check that field for a value. If it has a value then I call saveWithRequestedId instead. Other wise I let it generate the Id. This worked well because I can still use the sequence for Hibernate that is set up if I need an Id. The reflection might add overhead so I might change it a little. I was thinking of having a getId() or getPK() method in all entities so I don't have to search for which field is the #Id.
Before I used reflection I tried calling session.getIdentifier(entity) to check but I was getting TransientObjectException( "The instance was not associated with this session" ). I couldn;t figure out how to get the Entity into the session without saving it first so I gave up. Below is the listener code I wrote.
public class MergeListener extends org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3MergeEventListener
{
#Override
protected Serializable saveWithGeneratedId(Object entity, String entityName, Object anything, EventSource source, boolean requiresImmediateIdAccess) {
Integer id = null;
Field[] declaredFields = entity.getClass().getDeclaredFields();
for (Field field : declaredFields) {
Id annotation = field.getAnnotation(javax.persistence.Id.class);
if(annotation!=null) {
try {
Method method = entity.getClass().getMethod("get" + field.getName().substring(0, 1).toUpperCase() + field.getName().substring(1));
Object invoke = method.invoke(entity);
id = (Integer)invoke;
} catch (Exception ex) {
//something failed (method not found..etc) , keep going anyway
}
break;
}
}
if(id == null ||
id == 0) {
return super.saveWithGeneratedId(entity, entityName, anything, source, requiresImmediateIdAccess);
} else {
return super.saveWithRequestedId(entity, id, entityName, anything, source);
}
}
}
I then had to add the listener to my persistence.xml
<property name="hibernate.ejb.event.merge" value="my.package.MergeListener"/>
it's not a good Idea, sequences are used for surrogate keys, are meaningless in the business sense but assures you, there won't be duplicates thus no error at inserting time.
Related
I have a problem which I try to figure out since many hours now.
I must save a model with manual set id in the database using CrudRepository and Hibernate.
But the manual set of the id is ignored always.
Is it somehow possible, to force
CrudRepository.save(Model m)
to persist the given Model with UPDATE?
The queries always results in INSERT statements, without using the id.
The reason I must do this manually is, that the identifier is not the database ID - it is a ID generated outside as UUID which is unique over multiple databases with this model-entry. This model is shared as serialized objects via hazelcast-cluster.
Following an example:
The database already contains a Model-Entry with the id 1:
id identifier_field_with_unique_constraint a_changing_number
1 THIS_IS_THE_UNIQUE_STRING 10
Now I need to update it. I create a new Model version
Model m = new Model();
m.setIdentifierFieldWithUniqueConstraint(THIS_IS_THE_UNIQUE_STRING);
m.setAChangingNumberField(20);
saveMe(m);
void saveMe(Model m) {
Optional<Model> presentModalOpt = modelCrudRepo.findByIdentField(THIS_IS_THE_UNIQUE_STRING)
if(presentModalOpt.isPresent()) {
// The unique value in my identifier field exists in the database already
// so use that id for the new model, so it will be overwritten
m.setId(modalOpt.get().getId());
} else {
m.setId(null);
}
// This call will now do an INSERT, instead of UPDATE,
// even though the id is set in the model AND the id exists in the database!
modelCrudRepo.save(m);
// ConstraintViolationException for the unique identifier field.
// It would be a duplicate now, which is not allowed, because it uses INSERT instead of UPDATE
}
The id Field is tagged with #Id and #GeneratedValue annotation (for the case that the id is null and the id should be generated)
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
I even tried to changed this field only to an #Id field without #GeneratedValue and generate the ID always on my own. It had no effect, it always used INSERT statements, never UPDATE.
What am I doing wrong?
Is there another identifier for the CrudRepository that declares the model as an existing one, other than the id?
I'm happy for any help.
CrudRepository has only save method but it acts for both insert as well as update.
When you do save on entity with empty id it will do a save.
When you do save on entity with existing id it will do an update
that means that after you used findById for example and changed
something in your object, you can call save on this object and it
will actually do an update because after findById you get an object
with populated id that exist in your DB.
In your case you are fetching the records based on a field (unique) But records will update only when the model object has a existing primary key value
In your code there should be presentModalOpt instead of modalOpt
void saveMe(Model m) {
Optional<Model> presentModalOpt = modelCrudRepo.findByIdentField(THIS_IS_THE_UNIQUE_STRING)
if(presentModalOpt.isPresent()) { // should be presentModalOpt instead of modalOpt
} else {
m.setId(null);
}
modelCrudRepo.save(m);
}
See the default implementation -
/*
* (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository#save(java.lang.Object)
*/
#Transactional
public <S extends T> S save(S entity) {
if (entityInformation.isNew(entity)) {
em.persist(entity);
return entity;
} else {
return em.merge(entity);
}
}
Assume that "Project" is POJO. In service layer of my project, I wrote a function that is get a row from table.
#Override
public ProjectDto getAProject(Long id) {
try {
Project project = projectRepository.getOne(id);
if (project==null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Project not found");
} else {
return modelMapper.map(project, ProjectDto.class);
}
} catch (EntityNotFoundException ex) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Project not found");
}
}
The function is working fine with already exist id values. But if I give non-exist value, an exception occur like following. Looks like "getOne()" function don't throw "EntityNotFoundException".
ModelMapper mapping errors: Error mapping com.issuemanagement.entity.Project to com.issuemanagement.dto.ProjectDto
that means the exception come from model mapper logic. Because "project" object filled with null values so couldn't map to DTO class. I modified the function as following to fix this.
#Override
public ProjectDto getAProject(Long id) {
boolean isExist = projectRepository.existsById(id);
if (isExist) {
Project project = projectRepository.getOne(id);
return modelMapper.map(project, ProjectDto.class);
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Project not found");
}
}
but in this way the program goes to DB for two times. I don't like it. How can I do this operation with just one transaction?
BTW, if I try to run "toString()" function of "project", it throw "EntityNotFoundException" but it's looks like not official way. or it is? I hope there should be a boolean variable in somewhere.
getOne() on JpaRepository will call getReference() on EntityManager under the hood which will return an instance whose state is lazily fetch .The EntityNotFoundException will not throw immediately but will only be thrown when its state is accessed at the first time .
It is normally used in the case that when you need to configure a #ManyToOne relationship for an entity (Let say configure a Department for an Employee) but you just have the ID of the related entity.(e.g. DepartmentId) . Using getOne() allows you to get a Department proxy instance such that you do not really need to query the database to get the actual Department instance just for setting up its relationship for an Employee.
In your case , you should use findById() which will return an empty Optional if the instance does not exist:
#Override
public ProjectDto getAProject(Long id) {
Project project = projectRepository.findById(id)
.orElseThrow(()->new IllegalArgumentException("Project not found"));
return modelMapper.map(project, ProjectDto.class);
}
Let's pretend a RESTful service receives a PATCH request to update one or more fields of an entity that might have tens of fields.
#Entity
public class SomeEntity {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
// many other fields
}
One dirty way to patch the corresponding entity is to write something like this:
SomeEntity patch = deserialize(json);
SomeEntity existing = findById(patch.getId());
if (existing != null)
{
if (patch.getField1() != null)
{
existing.setField1(patch.getField1());
}
if (patch.getField2() != null)
{
existing.setField2(patch.getField2());
}
if (patch.getField3() != null)
{
existing.setField3(patch.getField3());
}
}
But this is insane! And if I want to patch 1 to many & other associations of the entity the insanity could even become hazardous!
Is there a sane an elegant way to achieve this task?
Modify the getter's of SomeEntity and apply check, if any value is blank or null just return the corresponding entity object value.
class SomeEntity {
transient SomeEntity existing;
private String name;
public String getName(){
if((name!=null&&name.length()>0)||existing==null){
return name;
}
return existing.getName();
}
}
You can send an array containing the name of the fields you are going to patch. Then, in the server side, by reflection or any field mapping, set each field to the entity. I have already implemented that and it works, thought my best advice is this:
Don't publish an endpoint to perform a "generic" PATCH (modification), but one that performs a specific operation. For instance, if you want to modify an employee's address, publish an endpoint like:
PUT /employees/3/move
that expects a JSON with the new address {"address" : "new address"}.
Instead of reinventing the wheel by writing the logic yourself, why don't you use a mapping library like Dozer? You want to use the 'map-null' mapping property: http://dozer.sourceforge.net/documentation/exclude.html
EDIT I am not sure whether or not it would be possible to map a class onto itself. You could use an intermediary DTO, though.
In my datamodel a have many entities where attributes are mapped to enumerations like this:
#Enumerated(EnumType.STRING)
private MySpecialEnum enumValue;
MySpecialEnum defines some fixed values. The mapping works fine and if the database holds a NULL-value for a column I get NULL in the enumValue-attribute too.
The problem is, that my backend module (where I have no influence on) uses spaces in CHAR-columns to identify that no value is set. So I get an IllegalArgumentException instead of a NULL-value.
So my question is: Is there a JPA-Event where I can change the value read from the database before mapping to the enum-attribute?
For the write-access there is the #PrePersist where I can change Null-values to spaces. I know there is the #PostLoad-event, but this is handled after mapping.
Btw: I am using OpenJpa shipped within WebSphere Application Server.
You could map the enum-type field as #Transient (it will not be persisted) and map another field directly as String, synchronizing them in #PostLoad:
#Transient
private MyEnum fieldProxy;
private String fieldDB;
#PostLoad
public void postLoad() {
if (" ".equals(fieldDB))
fieldProxy = null;
else
fieldProxy = MyEnum.valueOf(fieldDB);
}
Use get/setFieldProxy() in your Java code.
As for synchronizing the other way, I'd do it in a setter, not in a #PreUpdate, as changes to #Transient fields probably do not mark the entity as modified and the update operation might not be triggered (I'm not sure of this):
public void setFieldProxy(MyEnum value) {
fieldProxy = value;
if (fieldProxy == null)
fieldDB = " ";
else
fieldDB = value.name();
}
OpenJPA offers #Externalizer and #Factory to handle "special" database values.
See this: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openjpa/2.0.x/manual/manual.html#ref_guide_pc_extern_values
You might end up with something like this: not tested...
#Factory("MyClass.mySpecialEnumFactory")
private MySpecialEnum special;
...
public static MySpecialEnum mySpecialEnumFactory(String external) {
if(StringUtils.isBlank(external) return null; // or why not MySpecialEnum.NONE;
return MySpecialEnum.valueOf(external);
}
I'm using spring MVC for receiving a JSON from client and automatically create an object from it. The problem is that the client doesn't send to server all the fields that are in the entity, but some fields are null and overwrite existing values calling userDao.persist(user). For example, i have this entity:
#Entity
public class User {
#Id #GeneratedValue
private int id;
private String username;
private String password;
private String email;
But the user never send me the password, so the object built from JSON has "password" field empty. I don't want the password field to be overwritten by a null value. There's a way to say to hibernate "if you find a null value ignore it and don't overwrite the value that is saved in database?". I can't believe that there isn't a easy solution to this apparently simple problem.
I think the source of your problem is that the object you're getting back from your JSON parsing never had the actual values in it. It is a bean that has only the values set that are in your JSON.
You need to load your entity from the DB and then set the non-null fields from your JSON onto the loaded entity. That way only fields that are supplied in the JSON will be set.
I recommend an adapter of some sort to "merge" (not JPA merge) the DB version and the JSON version before saving the DB version.
Adding a #NotNull constraint and Bean Validation will make sure the values are not null when attempting to save. Unfortunately they won't help you get the values into the entity to save.
I have the same issue.
I solved it in this way.
import org.apache.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.util.Hashtable;
public class Updater {
private final static Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(Updater.class);
public static <E> E updater(E oldEntity, E newEntity) {
Field[] newEntityFields = newEntity.getClass().getDeclaredFields();
Hashtable newHT = fieldsToHT(newEntityFields, newEntity);
Class oldEntityClass = oldEntity.getClass();
Field[] oldEntityFields = oldEntityClass.getDeclaredFields();
for (Field field : oldEntityFields){
field.setAccessible(true);
Object o = newHT.get(field.getName());
if (o != null){
try {
Field f = oldEntityClass.getDeclaredField(field.getName());
f.setAccessible(true);
log.info("setting " + f.getName());
f.set(oldEntity, o);
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
return oldEntity;
}
private static Hashtable<String, Object> fieldsToHT(Field[] fields, Object obj){
Hashtable<String,Object> hashtable = new Hashtable<>();
for (Field field: fields){
field.setAccessible(true);
try {
Object retrievedObject = field.get(obj);
if (retrievedObject != null){
log.info("scanning " + field.getName());
hashtable.put(field.getName(), field.get(obj));
}
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
return hashtable;
}
}
It is clearly a workaround but it seems to work smoothly... in the next days I think I'll write the recursive part.
Implement setters for you attributes and do the checks there.
Check Hibernate Validation project, which can be used to verify your object on DAO level, as well as on Spring Web layer.
I wrote this answer while being an unexpirienced studen. Today my answer would be similar to the one from #James DW. Also, from the term userDao, I assume that it is some kind of ORM/ODM. In that case it is definitly worth searching "pros and cons of ORM/ODM".
original answer (which was accepted back in 2011):
If your problem is only the database, then I suggest you use a stored procedure, which checks if that value is null, and then dose not change the existing value. That way you can still send a null value, and your validation is on server side which is more robust.