We Keep Coding

understanding how custom metrics publisher work on hystrix

I am struggling a little bit to understand how to implement a Hystrix Metrics Publisher plugin.
Having read the documentation, it is still not clear how things are supposed to work together.
My goal is to write a plugin that will collect every metrics published by hystrix and write these metrics to a file on disk.
This file will later be collected and processed by an external tool giving us a good historical basis of the circuit’s behavior and problems.
The system where hystrix is running is a normal spring application. This said, I am also somewhat new on the java platform (although I am comfortable with the java language).
I thought that a first step towards understanding how the plugin could be implemented would be looking at the already implemented publishers. With this in mind, I looked at some of the implementations of hystrix-contrib directory.
I have chosen hystrix-codahale-metrics-publisher and hystrix-servo-metrics-publisher.
Both of them have a main class (servo is HystrixServoMetricsPublisher) which seems to register for receiving all possible kinds of metrics and some classes to deal with each kind of metric.
By looking at what I will call the main class, I see that, for example, there is a method called getMetricsPublisherForCommand that must return an implementation of the interface HystrixMetricsPublisherCommand.
Now questions start:
Question 1 I am assuming that once a plugin is registered every execution of every command on the context where the plugin is registered, and by the word command we can understand every execution of the execute() method of every class which inherits from HistrixCommand on that context, will generate a call to the getMetricsPublisherForCommand() method of my plugin. Is it true?
If so, there are a lot of low level implementations in hystrix such as thread pools and other, Should my getMetricsPublisherForCommand() implementation be thread-safe or I am guaranteed to receive calls in a sequential order? On what thread will my getMetricsPublisherForCommand() be executed?
Question 2 By looking at the documentation I am still not sure about what exactly the implementation of HystrixMetricsPublisherCommand to be returned by getMetricsPublisherForCommand() has to do. This is due to the fact that the HystrixMetricsPublisherCommand interface only specifies a method called initialize (). if it specified a method called, say, publish() I would conclude that the hystrix engine would call my custom getMetricsPublisherForCommand() method to get a metrics publisher on which it would call a publish() method to perform the custom publishing. But the initialize () method seens to be called only once when this given object is returned and I have found no other method the engine would call afterwards.
Also, by reading the documentation, I am under the impression that the implementation of HystrixMetricsPublisherCommand returned by getMetricsPublisherForCommand() will be somehow a singleton which completely breaks my understanding about how the thing is supposed to work.
The documentation say this:
The initialize() method will be called once-and-only-once to indicate when this instance can register with external services, start publishing metrics etc.
If you look at the servopublisher however you will notice that, unless I am completely and absolutely confused, the publishing stuff is performed right from the constructor. Now, if initialize() will be called to make some setup, how can I code my logic from the constructor where, unless the object is a singleton, it will be executed before any method including initialize () will have a chance to be called? In the other hand ,,, if this is a singleton, how can it run its constructor for every hystrix command?
May be I have missed something, I don't know ... but I need to understand conceptually what is going on here in order to implement my logic the right way. Thanks for your patience and I hope I have made myself clear enough in this long question.

First, recommend staying within the one (concise) question format.
Second, recommend using an existing implementation such as the default CodaHale (formerly DropWizard) implementation (which publishes to Graphite repository for Grafana consumption for example) to get it working.
HystrixPlugins.reset();
final WebApplicationContext springContext =
WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(sce.getServletContext());
HystrixPlugins plugins = HystrixPlugins.getInstance();
plugins.registerCommandExecutionHook(...);
// Good idea to use properties to enable/disable metrics generally...
// Using Spring type example...
if (hystrixMetricsEnabled.get()) {
plugins.registerMetricsPublisher(new HystrixCodaHaleMetricsPublisher(
getRegistry(springContext, sce.getServletContext())));
...
Otherwise the Hystrix documentation and full source of classes involved are publicly available:
https://github.com/Netflix/Hystrix/wiki/Plugins#metricspublisher

How to know which methods are invoked in java?

Is there any way to know which methods are getting invoked in Java during run time. Actually I am trying to detect those methods which are getting invoked and according to those methods that are invoked use Java Reflection APIS to invoke another method from another classes. In this way I want to divert the execution to my methods first and then call those running methods.
e.g
//Method Invoked_Method = "get the invoked method here "
if(Invoked_Method.equals("somemethodName"){
//invoke Another method ..
}
Although its a security breach, but I am working in team for security products. So have to experiment this.

You may want to consider AOP: http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/
This allows you to intercept method calls that match a particular expression and enhance or change the default behaviour of the method.
If you're already using them, the Spring and Guice frameworks provide ways to leverage AOP relatively easily.

I suppose what you are saying is you need to trace the callstack at runtime. I found a thread regarding this.
Check this out

Define a Wrapper for non-primitive types(classes)

I am implementing a middleware service provider in a distributed system, which provide lock management to the methods which are calling it,
we may have many commands requiring this service
Actually this service checks some conditions to see if it is safe to execute the command and if it is safe then it executes the command on a remote object,
I was thinking of defining a wrapper which receives the command , do the locking and return the result of command execution,
Is there any way to implement such a pattern ?
Thanks ,
Arian

As I understand you need to use Proxy pattern. Look in this answer for more details about how to do this in java. I think this is exactly what you need.

It's the Proxy pattern. The G4 book (Erich Gamma) cites an example which is just what you need: a Protection Proxy. This is essentially your proposed solution, create a new class which encapsulates the locking and access control.

What is the better way to code sequence of asynchronous calls in java?

Suppose I am writing a class, which is controlling third party remote server with remote calls. Each call is asynchronous, i.e. the answer for it returns into separate function.
What is the best pattern or algorithm to wrap that remote calls?
Write wrapper method for each call with callback object as last parameter?
Each wrapper method should return "Future" object to wait for result
Make listener for results which should be added to an instance
something else?

I'm not sure there's a lot of difference across the possible solutions you're suggesting above. I would recommend using existing classes and patterns as much as possible (e.g. you mention the Future class above).
One thing that may influence your solution (and that you don't mention) is whether you need to process the results in the same order as you issue the requests, and/or if you're able to process the results in parallel or whether this needs to be synchronous.

Does Mediator Pattern work in this situation?

So for my current project, there are basically three main Java classes:
GUI
Instant Messaging
Computation
Essentially, there needs to be full communication, so we've decided to use the mediator approach rather than than allow the GUI to run the entire project.
Basically, the mediator is going to encapsulate the communication. The problem we've run into is how to allow the GUI components to update without building a ton of methods for the mediator to call anytime something completes.
Ex. Say the GUI wants to log in the user, it goes through the mediator to create a thread and log in, but then the mediator has to relay the success/failure back to GUI as well as update a status message.
The other issue is things that need to update the GUI but do not need the moderator. Is it practical to just allow the GUI to create an instance of that class and run it or should everything go through the mediator?
Our original design just had the GUI managing everything, but it really killed reusability. Is there a better design method to use in this case?

If you're finding Observer to bring too much overhead, Mediator may be the best way to go. I definitely think that you shouldn't have the GUI run the show. If you're going to use the Mediator pattern, the mediator itself should be in charge. Something you might consider is a variant of the Command pattern. If you were using Ruby, I might recommend passing function callbacks around as a means of avoiding having the mediator contact the GUI for every little thing. But since it's Java, some form of encapsulating an action in Command pattern style may help.

If you don't want the callback/notification to be triggerd by the mediator, you can inject the callback into the login function and have login call it when it finishes.
I don't know how you would go about injecting the callback in Java, though. In a language where functions are first class citizens, you could just pass the function, but you're in Java so I guess you will have to use the command pattern as kmorris suggested.

You might also try having the GUI give the mediator a callback object that handles retrieving return values or setting whatever values you need (a version of the Command pattern). There would then be one per call from the GUI to the mediator.
Another thought is to group the methods the mediator calls into semantically related chunks. In particular if the mediator has sections where it tends to call several GUI methods in a row:
gui.a()
gui.b()
gui.c()
you can create a single method that handles the result of calling all three. The advantage of semantically grouped methods (i.e. setFileInformation over setFileMenu, setTab, etc.) is also then if you need to change the GUI, the contents of the methods might change, but the call the mediator makes may not.