I try to reuse an existing WebView by clearing any private data the previous user left behind:
CookieManager.getInstance().removeAllCookie();
webview.clearHistory();
webview.clearFormData();
webview.clearCache(true);
clearHistory seems only to clear the back/forward list, accessible via API, but not the internal list used for coloring links inside the web content.
I even tried the following, suggested by another stackoverflow answer:
deleteDatabase("webview.db");
deleteDatabase("webviewCache.db");
I still have no luck: CSS :visited selectors still work after reloading the page.
An alternative would be to use the API level 11 private browsing feature (new constructor argument), but then I cannot benefit from visited links at all; and can no longer target older versions.
Maybe someone has a solution for this issue? Thanks for your help.
Summary of the answers I got so far:
I tried these two answers, but the first seems to clear HTML5 data storage and the latter seems to be specific to the built-in browser:
WebStorage.getInstance().deleteAllData();
Browser.clearHistory(getContentResolver());
WebChromeClient.getVisitedHistory(ValueCallback<String[]> callback) is only called after the first time I create a new WebView in a recently installed application.
I tried to remove the WebView from view hierachy and create a new one, but unfortunately the visited history seems to be stored for the whole application.
Override WebChromeClient and WebViewClient... Damn that was hidden.
I actually had to dig up a bit to find this out.
WebView webView = (WebView)findViewById(R.id.myWebView);
WebChromeClient myWebChromeClient = new WebChromeClient(){
#Override
public void getVisitedHistory(ValueCallback<String[]> callback) {
// called during webview initialization, original implementation does strictly nothing
// and defaults to the native method WebViewCore.nativeProvideVisitedHistory()
String[] myUserHistory = getVisitedUrlsFromMyOwnDatabase(userId);
callback.onReceiveValue(myUserHistory);
}
};
WebViewClient myWebViewClient = new WebViewClient(){
#Override
public void doUpdateVisitedHistory(WebView view, String url,
boolean isReload) {
// called whenever there is a new link being visited
insertIfNotExistVisitedUrlIntoMyOwnDatabaseForUser(userId);
super(view, url, isReload);
}
}
webView.setWebViewClient(myWebViewClient);
webView.setChromeClient(myWebChromeClient);
webView.getSettings().etc(whatever)...
I think I'm "almost there". Here's the part I managed: what it does so far is remove css history altogether, so we're halfway there. I can't get the browser to recognize the url format I'm providing in "myUserHistory", so in effect the only feature this code does is reset css history altogether, but it's only called once when the WebView is instanciated (or created, didn't check), so for a true multiuser experience you'd need to recreate the webview at each login.
My problem now is that I can't manage to load the urlHistory properly. My Honeycomb Xoom webview seems to ignore my data.
Ah well, I hope it works for you. For me just calling callback.onReceiveValue(new String[]{}); in getVisitedHistory() will be good enough.
EDIT:
I just put twenty more minutes into it because I'm curious. This method is what delegates to the WebChromeClient (mCallbackProxy = WebChromeClient).
protected void populateVisitedLinks() {
ValueCallback callback = new ValueCallback<String[]>() {
public void onReceiveValue(String[] value) {
sendMessage(EventHub.POPULATE_VISITED_LINKS, (Object)value);
}
};
mCallbackProxy.getVisitedHistory(callback);
}
It's protected in WebViewCore, which is a private attribute of WebView with no accessor. The sendMessage delegates to EventHub which is private, and WebViewCore is filled with private native methods, and one of these seems to be the one actually calling the populateVisitedLinks() method during the initialization.
Unless someone at Google adds a public method to WebView to trigger the repopulation, I'm afraid it's practically impossible to achieve your goal. Sorry :(
As a side note, all these native visited history handling really makes me wonder: why do hardware manufacturers care so much about which urls we visited? ;) <<< sarcasm
As an alternate solution, you could try adding your own CSS with the same base colors the default CSS has and switch the CSS by another one (with same color for both "types" of links) when you want to reset the visited links.
A:link{color: "#990000"; text-decoration: none;}
A:visited{color: "#990000"; text-decoration: none;}
A:hover{color: "#ff0000"; text-decoration: none;}
If you can obtain a Browser instance (maybe you can set a WebChromeClient to WebView) you can use its clearHistory() method.
Does WebStorage.clearAllData() have the desired effect? Unfortunately, the documentation on this class is very sparse compared to WebView and doesn't say whether it applies to WebViews.
The exact time you're calling clearHistory() may also have an effect. Clearing it and then navigating to a new page may still keep the first page in history, and you have to call the method after the new page has loaded.
Personally, if privacy is a real issue, I would create a new set of objects from scratch for this new session if possible.
Related
I'm trying to get some elements in a web page using webView.loadUrl(...);.
However, I found out that there is a loading that "creates" these elements after the page is already loaded. So, I didn't find a way to get these.
I tried to use onPageFinished but it doesn't look like it is called when the loading inside the web page finishes.
I also tried to put a button that triggers the webView.loadUrl(...);. This tip only works if the user doesn't click too fast on the button, because then the loading doesn't have the time to finish before.
Here is a video of the page booting up, hoping for you to better understand what I mean by a loading inside the page :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1267dcJai8&feature=youtu.be
If I haven't been clear enough, I'd be happy to clarify things further.
Thank you in advance!
Edit : To clarify something, I'm not exactly asking for a way to get these elements. A way to delay the webView.loadUrl(...); while the webpage is loading would also be perfect for me.
Try onProgressChanged() of WebChromeClient like below.
Documentation link:
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/WebChromeClient#onProgressChanged(android.webkit.WebView,%20int)
#Override
public void onProgressChanged(WebView view, final int newProgress) {
super.onProgressChanged(view, newProgress);
if (newProgress == 100) {
//Page load done
}
else
{
//Page is still loading wait...
}
}
The GWT web app I'm building has a page where users can upload CSV files. The upload code uses the Moxieapps GWT Uploader, which mostly works great.
However, I've discovered a strange scenario, where navigating away from the page and back to it adds the upload button again. So the third time I visit the page, the upload section will look like this:
And the relevant part of the generated HTML viewed in an inspector shows that both the input and the div containing the "button" get added over and over (though there is only ever one dropzone):
I've gone over my code many times to see whether I was doing something that could be causing this, but haven't found anything. You don't actually manually add the button or the input; this is done automatically by the framework. The fileUploader gets initialised only once (this being GWT client code, I've debugged using the inspector as well as logging statements to the console to confirm this):
fileUploader.setButtonDisabled(true).setFileTypes("*.csv")
.setUploadURL(getBaseUrl() + "/fileUpload.upload")
.setButtonText("<span class=\"buttonText\">Select CSV file to upload</span>")
.setFileSizeLimit(FILE_SIZE_LIMIT)
.setButtonCursor(CustomUploader.Cursor.HAND)
.setButtonAction(CustomUploader.ButtonAction.SELECT_FILE)
.setUploadProgressHandler(new UploadProgressHandler() {...})
.setUploadSuccessHandler(...)
// etc. with other handlers
The method setButtonText() is called from a couple of other places, and the text changes as it should, but only on the last button (if there are several). Otherwise, there's nothing in my code that could possibly be adding the button as far as I can tell.
Has anyone else encountered this issue? Is there some property I need to set to prevent this? Could it be a bug in the moxieapps code?
After writing out my question, and adding "Could it be a bug in the moxieapps code?" at the end, I followed up on that suspicion, and it turns out that it is indeed a bug in the org.moxieapps.gwt.uploader.client.Uploader class.
The input and the "select file" button are added in the onLoad() method of that class without a check whether they may have been added already.
It looks like there hasn't been any active development on this framework for some time, so I thought it was time for a custom override version. I've tested this and it works:
package yourpackagename.client.override;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.moxieapps.gwt.uploader.client.Uploader;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.FileUpload;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Widget;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.WidgetCollection;
/**
* The sole reason this class exists is to fix a bug in the moxieapps uploader
* (org.moxieapps.gwt.uploader-1.1.0.jar) where it adds a new upload input and
* button each time its <code>onLoad()</code> method is called, i.e. every time
* you navigate away from the page and then back to it.
*/
public class CustomUploader extends Uploader {
#Override
protected void onLoad() {
boolean hasFileUploadAlready = false;
WidgetCollection children = getChildren();
for (Iterator<Widget> iterator = children.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
Widget eachWidget = iterator.next();
if (eachWidget instanceof FileUpload) {
hasFileUploadAlready = true;
}
}
// Only call the super method if there isn't already a file upload input and button
if (!hasFileUploadAlready) {
super.onLoad();
}
}
}
Instead of referencing the org.moxieapps.gwt.uploader.client.Uploader, I've changed the references to point to my custom uploader class, which will now check for an existing FileUpload child widget, and simply skip the original onLoad() code if it finds such a widget.
Might be a bit of a crowbar approach, but it works (and in my case, changing the maven-managed JAR file is not very practical). Hopefully, this will be useful to anyone else coming across this problem.
I am brand new to GWT and am trying to achieve the following:
Here's the code that I've cooked up:
public class MyWebApp implements EntryPoint {
// The main container for everything the user sees (the "view")
private LayoutPanel mainPanel;
// Simple HTML for the header ("MyWebApp") and subsequent <hr/>
private SafeHtml header;
// The three links "Dashboard", "Monitors" and "Help Desk"
private HorizontalPanel navMenu;
// The empty content that gets populated when user clicks one of
// the 3 links.
private Panel menuContent;
#Override
public void onModuleLoad() {
// The initial fragment contains the header, nav menu and empty "content" div.
// Each menu/screen then fills out content div.
initMainPanel();
RootPanel.get().add(mainPanel);
}
private void initMainPanel() {
SafeHtmlBuilder headerBuilder = new SafeHtmlBuilder();
navMenu = new HorizontalPanel();
// Leaving null until user clicks on one of the 3 menus.
// Then the menu will decide what panel gets injected for
// this panel.
menuContent = null;
// Create the simple HTML for the header.
headerBuilder.append("<h1>MyWebApp</h1><hr/>");
// Create the navMenu items.
Hyperlink dashboardLink, monitorsLink, helpDeskLink;
// Homepage is http://www.mywebapp.com
// I want the dashboardLink to inject menuContent and "redirect" user to
// http://www.mywebapp.com/dashboard
dashboardLink = new Hyperlink("???", "???");
// http://www.mywebapp.com/monitors
monitorsLink = new Hyperlink("???", "???");
// http://www.mywebapp.com/help-desk
helpDeskLink = new Hyperlink("???", "???");
navMenu.add(dashboardLink);
navMenu.add(monitorsLink);
navMenu.add(helpDeskLink);
// Add all widgets to the mainPanel.
mainPanel.add(new HTML(headerBuilder.toSafeHtml().toString()));
mainPanel.add(navMenu);
mainPanel.add(menuContent);
// Position and size the widgets (omitted for brevity).
// mainPanel.setWidgetHorizontalPosition(...);
}
private HTML getDashboardMenuContent() {
return new HTML("This is the dashboard.");
}
private HTML getMonitorsMenuContent() {
return new HTML("These are the monitors.");
}
private HTML getHelpDeskMenuContent() {
return new HTML("This is the help desk.");
}
}
Most importantly:
How do I "wire up" the Hyperlinks so that when the user clicks them, I can call the appropriate getXXXMenuContent() method, and then add that to menuContent?
But also:
I feel like I'm doing something wrong here: mainPanel.add(new HTML(headerBuilder.toSafeHtml().toString())); - if so what is it?!? How should I be adding a simple <h1> and <hr/> in a way that's secure (hence the use of the Safe* objects), efficient, and conforming to recommended practices?
Should I be implementing UiBinder here? If so, would I make UiBinders for each menu's content or for the entire mainPanel, or both?
Thanks in advance!
Hyperlink widgets trigger navigation. You don't want to handle clicks on them, you want to handle navigation (that could be triggered by clicking a Hyperlink or using the browser's back/forward buttons, a bookmark or link from elsewhere –including Ctrl+clicking a Hyperlink to open it in a new window/tab–, etc.)
To react to those navigation events, use History.addValueChangeHandler; and to handle the initial navigation on application start, call History.fireCurrentHistoryState() (after you add your handler of course).
More details in: https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsHistory
Would be better to split other questions to... other questions, but here are the answers anyway:
I feel like I'm doing something wrong here: mainPanel.add(new HTML(headerBuilder.toSafeHtml().toString())); - if so what is it?!? How should I be adding a simple <h1> and <hr/> in a way that's secure (hence the use of the Safe* objects), efficient, and conforming to recommended practices?
The HTML widget has a constructor taking a SafeHtml so you don't need to call toString().
If you're only using a constant, you don't need a SafeHtmlBuilder; use SafeHtmlUtils instead. But constants are no more or less secure with or without SafeHtml, SafeHtml just makes it easier to find all occurrences of HTML in your code, to help in doing a security review of your app (BTW, we're doing HTML, so <hr>, not <hr/>; if you really want it to look like XML/XHTML, then use <hr /> but you're only cheating yourself here)
Should I be implementing UiBinder here? If so, would I make UiBinders for each menu's content or for the entire mainPanel, or both?
If you don't feel the need for UiBinder, you don't have to use it. But in this case it won't change anything: you're not handling widget events, but history events.
Something like
dashboardLink.addClickHandler(
new ClickHandler()
{
public void onClick( ClickEvent event )
{
mainPanel.setWidget( getDashboardMenuContent() );
}
} );
You should note that Hyperlink.addClickHandler(...) is deprecated and it is recommended to use Anchor.addClickHandler(...) instead.
As for the other questions: It is a lot more elegant and easier to build UI's with UIBinder, so definitely look into that, but do try to make "it" work first to avoid the added complexity of the .ui.xml setup :-)
Cheers,
I have one simple piece of advice to give you. Use what the framework has to offer.
The HTML widget should be your last escape. There are so many widgets that there is no need for you to write html almost anywhere in your code.
So instead of headerBuilder, you can user the following piece of code
Label header = new Label("MyWebApp");
header.setStyleName("headerStyle",true);
You can set the style properties in an external Css file and add the reference inside the base html file or the gwt.xml file. So that answers your question about mainPanel.add(new HTML(headerBuilder.toSafeHtml().toString()));
In respect to the Hyperlink. If you choose to use hyperlinks, remember that the most effective usage is with the MVP pattern better known as Places and Activities (Lots of information on the web)
If you want something simpler instead the MenuBar and MenuItem classes should do the trick.
Look here for an example on how to use the MenuBar to control your application. There are many other ways but why not use the tools provided?
Also the UIBinder Vs the Designer/Classes methods is extensively discussed on stackoverflow resulting to a matter of choice and programming familiarity/preference.
In a Wicket app, I have a modal dialog that contains a simple form and a button. User enters values (report parameters), and then clicks the button which starts the download of a report file (typically a PDF). (All form values are required, and Wicket's validation mechanism is used to make sure user entered them before the download can start.)
Maybe this is better explained with a picture:
I'm using here a jQuery UI Dialog (instead of Wicket's ModalWindow which felt a lot clumsier and uglier from user's perspective).
Everything is pretty much working, except closing the dialog when/after clicking the download button.
Current version (irrelevant bits omitted):
public class ReportDownloadLink extends Link {
public ReportDownloadLink(String id, ReportDto report) {
super(id);
this.report = report;
}
#Override
public void onClick() {
IResourceStream resourceStream = new AbstractResourceStreamWriter() {
#Override
public void write(OutputStream output) {
try {
reportService.generateReport(output, report);
} catch (ReportGenerationException e) {
// ...
}
}
#Override
public String getContentType() {
// ...
}
};
ResourceStreamRequestTarget target =
new ResourceStreamRequestTarget(resourceStream, report.getFileName());
getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(target);
}
The dialog is a Wicket Panel (which makes use of ReportDownloadLink above), which we put in a certain div, and then when a report is selected in a list, the dialog is opened from an AjaxLink's onClick() quite simply like this:
target.appendJavascript(String.format("showReportExportDialog('%s')", ... ));
Which calls this JS function:
function showReportExportDialog(dialogTitle) {
$("#reportExportPanelContainer").dialog(
{modal:true, draggable:true, width: 320, height: 330, title: dialogTitle}
);
}
Some options:
Make ReportDownloadLink extend something else than Link, perhaps, and/or find an appropriate method to override which would allow me to execute the tiny bit of JavaScript needed to close the jQuery Dialog.
Investigate jQuery + Wicket libraries (such as jqwicket or wiquery) that supposedly make these two work better together.
Latest thing I tried was overriding method getOnClickScript() in ReportDownloadLink which seemed promising (according to the Javadocs, it returns "Any onClick JavaScript that should be used"):
#Override
protected CharSequence getOnClickScript(CharSequence url) {
return "closeDownloadDialog()";
}
Thing is, this causes onClick() not to be called at all, i.e., the download doesn't start.
Could I perhaps override some more "ajaxy" class from Wicket (than Link) to combine these things: first init the download, then call the JS for closing the dialog?
Any recommendations or experiences from similar cases? Note that I want to keep using the jQuery dialog here, even though it makes things like these more complicated. Using a DownloadLink (see related question) is fine too in case that makes things easier.
NB: if you recommend JQWicket or wiQuery, please provide an example of how to do this.
Maybe you can try to bind the close modal code to the button "click" event using only JQuery, in your modal panel page, add something similar to ${"#mySubmit").click(myCloseModalFunction). It should keep Wicket default's behavior and add modal closing in the mix.
The other way is to override the getOnClickScript(...) method but the javascript has to return true in order for the browser to call the continue link evaluation and load the corresponding href. If you return false, the evaluation stops. I would suggest something like
#Override
protected CharSequence getOnClickScript(CharSequence url) {
return "closeDownloadDialog();return true;";
}
Hope it helps...
See https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ajax-update-and-file-download-in-one-blow.html for inspiration.
I am taking my first steps with Apache Wicket and ran into the following problem. I have a ListView that displays a "delete" link right next to its entries. When the delete link is clicked, the entity represented by the list item is deleted from the database but the list itself does not get updated until I reload the page manually in the browser.
IModel<List<SampleEntity>> sampleEntityListModel = new LoadableDetachableModel<List<SampleEntity>>() {
#Override
protected List<SampleEntity> load() {
return mSampleEntityBA.findAll();
}
};
mListview = new ListView<SampleEntity>("listview", sampleEntityListModel) {
#Override
protected void populateItem(final ListItem<SampleEntity> item) {
item.add(new Label("listlabel", new PropertyModel<String>(item.getModelObject(),
"text")));
item.add(new Link<SampleEntity>("deleteLink", item.getModel()) {
#Override
public void onClick() {
mSampleEntityBA.delete(item.getModelObject());
}
});
}
};
When onClick called, item.getModelObject() pulls from the sampleEntityListModel which in turn calls mSampleEntityBA.findAll(). The model object of sampleEntityListModel will be cached for the duration on the request cycle (until it is detached - which is usually what you want) and is not aware of the call to delete().
In order to refresh the sampleEntityListModel, add a sampleEntityListModel.detach() call just after the delete (sampleEntityListModel must be made final, but this will not cause any extra state to be serialized). This will cause the model to fetch a fresh set of data when the list view is rendered later in the request cycle.
You probably want an AjaxLink instead of that Link, and then you have to make the list refresh, using the tactics described here, possibly adjusting a bit for the fact that the wiki has Wicket 1.3 code instead of 1.4.
But you might also be better off with a different repeater, such as a RefreshingView or a DataView. There are some examples of assorted repeaters here. While none of them are exactly what you're looking for, looking at that code might help.
looks like the problem is that your mSampleEntityBA.findAll(); is returning incorrect data. hard to help without seeing more code.
on a different note, you should really be using DataView when working with database-backed lists.
You might also want to check out JQGrid from the wiQuery project instead of DataView.