I have written a java server and here is the code:
try
{
ss = new ServerSocket(8080);
while (true)
{
socket = ss.accept();
System.out.println("Acess given");
in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream()));
//out = new PrintWriter(socket.getOutputStream(),true);
line = in.readLine();
System.out.println("you input is :" + in.readLine());
}
}
And an iphone application is the client and there is the code for it:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
socket = [[LXSocket alloc]init];
if ([socket connect:#"10.211.55.2" port:8080]) {
NSLog(#"socket has been created");
}
else {
NSLog(#"socket couldn't be created created");
}
#try {
}#catch (NSException * e) {
NSLog(#"Unable to send data");
}
[super viewDidLoad];
}
-(IBAction)sendData{
[socket sendString:#"A\n"];
}
I am having 2 problems here: first is that the server is only reading the input once. The second is that when ever I try to output the data it doesn't output until I have called the method twice (clicked on the uibutton twice). Not sure what is happening here. What am I doing wrong?
You are creating a new reader everytime in your while loop. Instead move the code outside the while loop and block on the readLine() call.
socket = ss.accept();
in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream());
String line = "";
while ( true) {
line = in.readLine();
System.out.println("you input is :" + line);
if ( "Bye".equals(line) )
break;
}
Here is an example server side program.
Since alphazero posted the pattern, I will post a brief stripped down implementation:
This is the Server:
try {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(portNumber);
logger.info("Server successfully started on port " + portNumber);
// infinite loop that waits for connections
while (true) {
SocketThread rst = new SocketThread(ss.accept());
rst.start();
}
} catch (IOException e) {
logger.info("Error: unable to bind to port " + portNumber);
System.exit(-1);
}
The SocketThread is something like:
public class SocketThread extends Thread {
private Socket communicationSocket = null;
public SocketThread(Socket clientSocket) {
communicationSocket = clientSocket;
try {
input = new ObjectInputStream(communicationSocket.getInputStream());
} catch (IOException e) {
logger.info("Error getting communication streams to transfer data.");
try {
communicationSocket.close();
} catch (IOException e1) {
e1.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
public void run() {
boolean listening=true;
DataObject command = null;
while (listening) {
try {
Object currentObject = input.readObject();
if (currentObject != null
&& currentObject instanceof DataObject) {
command = (DataObject) currentObject;
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
// If we got to this point is because we received a request from
// the client
// we can exit the loop
listening = false;
}
}
}
}
Note: "DataObject" is just a custom class which could be more practical since you can read the Dataobject itself from the socket without worrying about how many bytes you are reading, etc. Only condition is that DataObject is flagged as Serializable.
Hope it helps.
Tushar,
The general pattern is this (almost java but pseudo-code):
while (server-socket is accepting new connections)
{
// The server-socket's job is to listen for connection requests
// It does this typically in a loop (until you issue server-shutdown)
// on accept the server-socket returns a Socket to the newly connected client
//
socket s = server-socket.accept-connection();
// various options here:
//
// typically fire off a dedicated thread to servie this client
// but also review NIO or (home-grown) connection-map/handler patterns
// the general pattern:
// create a dedicated thread per connection accepted.
// pass Socket (s) to the handler method (a Runnable) and start it off
// and that is it.
// Here we use the general pattern and create a dedicated
// handler thread and pass of the new connections' socket reference
//
Thread handler-thread = new Thread (handler-routine-as-runnable, s);
handler-thread.start();
}
Related
I am using sockets in JAVA and I have 3 Servers that are Clients are the same time. I want them to exchange some information.
This is what I want to create:
The input should be something like this:
Server started at:/172.16.2.22:8080
info for first,
info for second,
info for third,
Server started at:/172.16.2.22:8081
info for first,
info for second,
info for third,
Server started at:/172.16.2.22:8082
info for first,
info for second,
info for third,
But for some reason it shows only the info of the client that is currently a server as well.
So I get this result:
Server started at:/172.16.2.22:8080
info for first
Server started at:/172.16.2.22:8081
info for second
Server started at:/172.16.2.22:8082
info for third
This is how I initiate my code, the Server:
private void startServer() {
ServerSocket providerSocket = null;
BufferedReader in = null;
try {
InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getByName(this.serv.getIP());
providerSocket = new ServerSocket(this.serv.getPort(), 50, addr);
System.out.println("ServThread started at:" + addr + ":" + this.serv.getPort());
// create a new thread object
Thread t = new ClientHandler(providerSocket);
// Invoking the start() method
t.start();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
This is the ClientHandler that I am using for threads:
class ClientHandler extends Thread {
final ServerSocket s;
// Constructor
public ClientHandler(ServerSocket s) {
this.s = s;
}
public void run() {
Socket s = null;
try {
s = this.s.accept();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
while (true) {
try {
Thread.sleep(500);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
try {
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s.getInputStream()));
// receive the answer from client
String line = null;
while ((line = in.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(line);
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
And finally my Clients, that are also the servers. I am using a for loop to read a txt with all the IP,PORTS of my servers:
private void startSender() {
for (MyServers servs : ServersTXT.fetchTXTofServers()) {
BufferedWriter out;
try (Socket s = new Socket(servs .getIP(), servs .getPort())) {
out = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(s.getOutputStream()));
out.write(servs.info());
out.newLine();
out.flush();
} catch (ConnectException err) {
// Connection failed because not all servers on the txt are up
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
I took some time to understand your architecture and I managed to figure out which was the problem. The ClientHandler is indeed wrong because the connection.accept() part is outside the while loop and the connections get lost. The architecture you are trying to achieve has the following rule. Once I get a connection, spawn a thread to handle this connection not just for one time, but continuously. The above code is going to fix your problem as long as you place it inside the run function at the ClientHandler thread.
ServerSocket providerSocket;
Socket connection;
InetAddress addr;
try {
addr = InetAddress.getByName(this.broker.getIP());
providerSocket = new ServerSocket(this.broker.getPort(), 50, addr);
while (true) {
connection = providerSocket.accept();
ObjectOutputStream out = new ObjectOutputStream(connection.getOutputStream());
ObjectInputStream in = new ObjectInputStream(connection.getInputStream());
System.out.println(n.readUTF());
in.close();
out.close();
connection.close();
}
} catch (Exception err) {
err.printStackTrace();
}
Also, at the sender part, at the try block, you try to execute the code at parenthesis, usually try blocks have no parentheses, in my code I removed it.
The situation is as following:
There is a server and a client, which both can initiate a command/message to each other.
Because the server can send a message at any time, the listening on the socket is done in a separate thread (a ListenerThread). This is all fine. The client can send messages and receive at the same time, however, how would you know if a certain response belongs to the command you sent when the server can also initiate a new command/message to notify that something happened?
If I send a message to the server, and the server responds with "OK" in the listening thread. How would you know this is the actual response of the message/command you sent (keeping in mind this is another thread). What if the server received an update from another client and sends that update first.
This like a chat application, though with an actual response for every sent command.
example case:
Let us say that the protocol only consists of a move <playernum> [<x>,<y>] command which indicates that a player has done a move (server notifies client) or that a player wants to do a move (client notifies server). Also, the server responds with "OK" if the move was okay or with "ERR" if not.
Safe state:
move 1 [3,4]
client ---> server
OK
client <--- server
Unsafe state:
move 1 [3,4]
client ---> server
move 2 [1,2]
client <--- server
OK
client <--- server
The client did not expect this response... should responded with OK.
You have a protocol where the client can read one of three possible messages:
OK (The move you made was accepted)
ERR (The move you made was rejected)
move PLAYERID <co-ord1,co-ord2>
It is a reasonable assumption that the messages OK and ERR will only be sent back to the socket which requested a move. However a legal move is broadcast to all other players (perhaps excluding the player who moved).
Since you can receive unsolicited responses (the moves that other players make), you have correctly created a listener thread. You have not described the action your application takes when it receives a move message from another client, but I will assume that your listener thread handles that case. What remains is how to co-ordinate your move commands, and the response to that which will appear in the listener thread.
To synchronize the submission of your move command, and the response, a BlockingQueue (called queue) will be used , and shared between the client and listener. The form of this will be:
Client:
out.println(command); // Where out is the socket PrintWriter stream
String response = queue.take(); // Where queue is the BlockingQueue
// Process either `OK` or `ERR`
Listener Thread:
while ((command = in.readLine()) != null) {
if (command.equalsIgnoreCase("OK") || command.equalsIgnoreCase("ERR"))
queue.put(command);
else if (command.startsWith("move")) {
// Process a move
}
else
System.out.println("Unrecognized command="+command);
}
As you can see, the client simply submits a command, and blocks for the response of "OK" or "ERR". The requirement for processing other player moves has moved into the listener thread.
The listener processes all three conditions (Another player move, an "OK" or an "ERR"). The messages responses "OK" and "ERR" are sent back to the client. A move command is processed separately, and as such is not the responsibility of the client making the moves.
Below I have mocked working code which demonstrates these concepts. The server will randomly (with equal probability) respond with:
OK
ERR
A multiline response which includes OK and another player's move
Code:
public class MoveGame {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
String command = "";
new Thread(new MoveServer()).start();
Socket socket = null;
PrintWriter out = null;
BlockingQueue<String> queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue<String>(10);
try {
socket = new Socket("localhost", 5001);
out = new PrintWriter(socket.getOutputStream(), true);
new Thread(new ClientReader(socket, queue)).start();
while (!command.equals("quit")) {
command = scanner.nextLine();
if (command.startsWith("move")) {
out.println(command);
String response = queue.take();
System.out.println("Client got response="+response);
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
scanner.close();
out.close();
try {
socket.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
static class ClientReader implements Runnable {
private final Socket socket;
private final BlockingQueue<String> queue;
public ClientReader(Socket socket, BlockingQueue<String> queue) {
super();
this.socket = socket;
this.queue = queue;
}
#Override
public void run() {
BufferedReader in = null;
try {
in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream()));
String command;
while ((command = in.readLine()) != null) {
if (command.equalsIgnoreCase("OK") || command.equalsIgnoreCase("ERR"))
queue.put(command);
else if (command.startsWith("move")) {
System.out.println("A player made a move: command="+command);
}
else
System.out.println("Unrecognized command="+command);
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
in.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
static class MoveServer implements Runnable {
#Override
public void run() {
Random random = new Random();
Socket socket = null;
try {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(5001);
while (true) {
System.out.println("Listening for new connections");
socket = ss.accept();
System.out.println("New session has started");
PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(socket.getOutputStream(), true);
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream()));
String command;
while ((command = in.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println("Got command="+command);
int responseType = random.nextInt(3);
if (responseType == 0)
out.println("OK");
else if (responseType == 1)
out.println("ERR");
else {
out.println("move 1 [3,4]");
out.println("OK");
}
}
in.close();
out.close();
socket.close();
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
socket.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
}
I have a chat program. The problem is that I am trying to disallow dupe names. Essentially, whenever a name change request is sent to the server, it is checked against the list of names currently in use and if it is already taken, the person is added to my shitlist (not allowed to post) and they are sent a message that they need to change their name.
I commented the crap out of the code since there is a lot so you can understand it easily.
The problem is that the wrong person is being sent the message that the name is already in use! I have spent the last 8 hours trying to find it and It's bloody driving me mad!
The server side code is long; I'll post the relevant bits and any further will be provided on request. I'll also link to the complete program. (Not the source, the JAR.)
JAR: https://www.mediafire.com/?4t2shjdjf7blpg2
//...Irrelevant bits ommitted...//
public class Server
{
// The server object reference
static Server server;
// Declarations:
private ArrayList<ObjectOutputStream> clientOutputStreams; // out streams
private ArrayList<String> takenNames = new ArrayList<>(); // taken names
private InetAddress ip;
private final int serverPort; // the port the server is running on
private static ObjectOutputStream changer; // the last person to change names
private ArrayList<ObjectOutputStream> shitList = new ArrayList<>();
private HashMap <InetAddress, ObjectOutputStream> ipMap =
new HashMap<>(); // <ip, outputstream>
//...Irrelevant bits ommited...//
// Don't mind this non-indentation, it is supposed to be.
public void tellEveryone(Message message, InetAddress senderIP)
{
// First check some special conditions..
if(message.getType() == Message.TYPE.IN_USE)
{
try
{
changer.writeObject(message);
}
catch (IOException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
// If someone is on my shitlist,
if(shitList.contains(ipMap.get(senderIP)))
{
// Warn them of their sins...
Message nopeMessage = new Message(Message.TYPE.SERVER,
"You may not send any messages until you change your name!",
"Server");
try
{
ipMap.get(senderIP).writeObject(nopeMessage);
}
catch(IOException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
else
{
// Send message normally to everyone...
// Sync, just to be safe
synchronized(clientOutputStreams)
{
for(ObjectOutputStream oo : clientOutputStreams) // while more clients...
{
try
{
oo.writeObject(message);
oo.flush();
}
catch(IOException e)
{
System.out.println("IOException caught during tellEveryone()");
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
System.out.println(getTimeStamp() + ": Message Sent by:".
concat(" " + senderIP + "/ " + message.getSenderName()));
}
}
The server handler inner class...
public class ServerHandler implements Runnable
{
#Override
public void run()
{
// Create a list of client out streams to send stuff...
clientOutputStreams = new ArrayList<>();
try // To establish a connection with clients
{
// Create server socket...
ServerSocket serverSocket = new ServerSocket(serverPort);
while(true) // Will always run! Blocks!
{
// Assign a client socket to any new socket connections...
// (The var used here is temp, but will be passed off soon.)
Socket clientSocket = serverSocket.accept();
// Get's the ip of the client that connected...
ip = clientSocket.getInetAddress();
System.out.println(ip + " " + "connected.");
// Create ooStream to send messages to client...
ObjectOutputStream ooStream =
new ObjectOutputStream(
clientSocket.getOutputStream());
// Add the client oo stream to the list of outputs...
clientOutputStreams.add(ooStream);
// Add user IP data to map of ip's
ipMap.putIfAbsent(ip, ooStream);
// Create new thread to run inner class ClientHandler...
Thread t = new Thread(new ClientHandler(clientSocket));
// Running the thread makes it safe to overwrite the...
// ...clientsocket variable.
t.start();
}
}
catch (IOException e)
{
System.out.println("Exception in server.run()");
// TODO: Revise
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
The client handler inner class
public class ClientHandler implements Runnable
{
private ObjectInputStream oInStream; // The client's input stream.
private Socket socket; // Socket to the client
public ClientHandler(Socket clientSocket)
{
try // to create an input stream...
{
socket = clientSocket; // <-- The one passed in to the method
// Potential error from previous version... REMOVE WHEN TESTED
oInStream = new ObjectInputStream(socket.getInputStream());
}
catch(IOException e)
{
System.out.println("Error establishing input stream");
}
}
#Override
public void run()
{
Message message;
try // To process incoming messages...
{
while(socket.isClosed() == false) // If the socket is open...
{
// While there are more messages...
// Also assigns to the message var.
while((message = (Message)oInStream.readObject()) != null)
{
// Passes on the message and sender info.
if(message.getType() == Message.TYPE.NAME_REQUEST)
{
changer = ipMap.get(socket.getInetAddress());
System.out.println(socket.getInetAddress());
System.out.println(changer.toString());
handleNameRequests(message);
}
else
{
tellEveryone(message, ip); // TEST CHANGE- DELETED IF TEST
}
}
// TEST TEST TEST
synchronized(clientOutputStreams)
{
int index =
clientOutputStreams.indexOf(
socket.getOutputStream());
clientOutputStreams.remove(index);
System.out.println("Removed the client in sync");
}
}
// TEST TEST TEST
socket.close(); // TEST CLOSING SOCKET WHEN DONE.
System.out.println("Sock closed after while loop in ch run()");
}
catch(IOException e)
{
System.out.println("IOException caught when "
+ "reading message.");
}
catch (ClassNotFoundException e)
{
System.out.println("Some poor sap is going to have to debug"
+ "this!");
}
finally
{
// THIS WHOLE BLOCK: TEST TEST TEST
try
{
oInStream.close();
System.out.println("just closed oinStream");
}
catch(IOException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
I FINALLY FOUND IT!
For any future people encountering a similar problem, the problem was that I was assigning the ip variable in the wrong place! This essentially resulted in the list of ip's being all the same! Another bug confounded that problem, in that when I disabled the sending ability of messages when on my shitlist (aren't programmers the darndest?), I disabled ALL types of messages, including those from the server, ect! Oops!
The lesson? Bugs hide in the darndest places. Walk through everything, and doubt what you know to be true. Assume nothing, verify everything. There are never enough print statements when debugging!
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Server server = new Server(9008);
}
}
public class Server {
private ServerSocket server;
private Socket client;
public Server(int port) {
try {
// Create out server with our desired port
server = new ServerSocket(port);
// Server started, let the user know
System.out.println("Server started at port " + port + "...");
} catch (IOException e) {
// Unable to start server, print error
System.out.println("Unable to start server on port " + port + "...");
}
// Start our main server method
runServer();
}
public void runServer() {
while (true) {
try {
// Wait for new clients and accept them
client = server.accept();
// Let the user know - print
System.out.println("New user connected - " + client.getLocalAddress().getHostAddress());
// Start thread for our client
Thread clientThread = new Thread(new ClientConnection(client));
clientThread.start();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
So at this points everything is going fine, now inside my clientThread the problem starts
public class ClientConnection implements Runnable {
private Socket socket;
public ClientConnection(Socket client) {
// Set client socket
this.socket = client;
}
public void run() {
try {
// Read from our client input
BufferedReader readClient = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream()));
String line;
while ((line = readClient.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println("Client says - " + readClient.readLine());
}
} catch(IOException e) {
}
}
}
Is there a better way to handle this?
My actual client
public class Main {
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
Socket socket = new Socket("localhost", 9008);
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(socket.getOutputStream()));
writer.write("Hello\n");
writer.flush();
socket.close();
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
I will get "Client says - null" displayed
UPDATE: The way to read in an InputStream/Reader is somethink like
while ((myString = readClient.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(myString);
}
this way the loop will exit when the connection is closed.
Also, move the try/catch outside the loop, or do some error control. If you get an exception, you do not want to just try get again in the loop.
UPDATE2: In case my comment was not clear enough, over your updated code do
String line;
while ((line = readClient.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println("Client says - " + line);
}
Just one read per iteration, at the while, so the loop can exit if line is null (that means the connection has been closed).
I have written a small Client/Server Program which already worked once but after adding Threads and some real input Data to it, i always get a closed Socket before being able to read the Object (the String). The Program always Prints "Client has already closed Connection!" from Function handleConnection in the ProcessDataThread.
ClientCode:
synchronized private static void sendToServer(){
Socket clientSocket = null;
BufferedOutputStream socketOut = null;
ObjectOutputStream out = null;
try{
String xmlToSend = "<startTag>\n<someOtherTag id=\"5555\">\n12345\n</someOtherTag>\n</startTag>\n";
Log.d(TAG, "Trying to send the following to the Server:" + xmlToSend);
//TODO load these from file
clientSocket = new Socket( "10.0.2.2", 7777);
socketOut = new BufferedOutputStream(clientSocket.getOutputStream());
out = new ObjectOutputStream(socketOut);
out.writeObject(xmlToSend);
out.flush();
}catch(Exception ex){
Log.e(TAG, "Could not write File to Server.", ex);
}
finally{
try{
if(clientSocket != null){
clientSocket.close();
}
if(out != null){
out.close();
}
}catch(IOException ex){
Log.e(TAG, "Could not close Socket.");
}
}
}
ServerCode:
ReceiverThread:
public void run()
{
try {
ServerSocket server = new ServerSocket(port);
//Only block for 10 Seconds and try again
server.setSoTimeout(10000);
while(!server.isClosed() && !stopped){
//Run
Socket client = null;
try
{
client = server.accept();
System.out.println("Accepted ClientConnection from " + client.getRemoteSocketAddress());
new ProcessDataThread(client).start();
}
catch( SocketTimeoutException tx){
//nothing
}
catch ( IOException e ) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
finally {
if ( client != null )
try { client.close(); } catch ( IOException e ) { e.printStackTrace(); }
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
ProcessDataThread:
public class ProcessDataThread extends Thread {
Socket client;
public ProcessDataThread(Socket sock) {
// xmlToProcess = xmlString;
this.client = sock;
}
private String handleConnection() {
BufferedInputStream socketIn = null;
ObjectInputStream in = null;
String xmlToProcess = null;
try {
if(!client.isClosed()){
System.out.println("Trying to read from Stream;");
socketIn = new BufferedInputStream(client.getInputStream());
in = new ObjectInputStream(socketIn);
Object xmlString = in.readObject();
System.out.println("Read some Object from Stream:" + xmlString.toString());
if (xmlString instanceof String) {
xmlToProcess = (String) xmlString;
System.out.println("Received the following XML:\n" + xmlToProcess);
}
}else{
System.out.println("Client has already closed Connection!");
}
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (EOFException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
if (socketIn != null) {
socketIn.close();
}
if(client != null){
client.close();
}
} catch (IOException ioex) {
ioex.printStackTrace();
}
}
return xmlToProcess;
}
#Override
public void run() {
String xmlToProcess = handleConnection();
if (xmlToProcess == null || xmlToProcess.isEmpty()) {
// Es konnte kein String vom Client gelesen werden.
return;
}
System.out.println(xmlToProcess);
}
}
I made some changes with jboi's Suggestions. This is what i got now. The error stays the same. I don't even get to reading the Stream in the Server because client.getClosed()
is always true!
In the Client Code:
clientSocket = new Socket( "10.0.2.2", 7777);
clientSocket.setTcpNoDelay(true);
socketOut = new BufferedOutputStream(clientSocket.getOutputStream());
out = new ObjectOutputStream(socketOut);
out.writeObject(xmlToSend);
out.flush();
socketOut.flush();
//Close Output on Socket to signalize the Server that we finished writing!
clientSocket.shutdownOutput();
in = clientSocket.getInputStream();
byte[] receivedData = new byte[8192];
while(in.read(receivedData) != -1) {
//Wait for the Server to Close the Connection
}
In the Server Code
socketIn = new BufferedInputStream(client.getInputStream());
in = new ObjectInputStream(socketIn);
Object xmlString = in.readObject();
System.out.println("Read some Object from Stream:" + xmlString.toString());
if (xmlString instanceof String) {
xmlToProcess = (String) xmlString;
System.out.println("Received the following XML:\n" + xmlToProcess);
}
out = client.getOutputStream();
out.write(1);
//Signalize the Client that we have read everything
client.shutdownOutput();
It is very probable that your client has closed the socket in the finally block before the server was able to read the data.
In your clients finally block you should use socket.shutdownOutput, then read on the client all incoming data till EOF and then close the socket.
On your server you read till EOF and then send an object as kind of acknowledge, e.g. Number of bytes in the message. You also end the send with socket.shutdownOutput() as you've done at the client. This puts again an EOF at the end of the data. This EOF is received by the client and it will finally close the socket.
The issue seems to be the client and server are unable to identify each others state:
Client sending data to server, where server has closed the connection
Server sending/reading data to client , where client has closed the connection
Either are unable to coordinate with each other, solutions could be to establish a proper state machine. Some examples in Google if you search for (client and server state machine) gives mathematically definite state machine examples for your application: hope this comment helps.
Hence it's not useful to look into this problem in solution perspective and probably start using protocols in place like : telnet etc .
Ok now i'm feeling stupid.
I closed the Socket inside the Server Code myself.
After accepting a connection the following is executed inside the finally Block:
try {
client.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
The reason that there is this finally Block was because i didn't use Threads before so the ReceiverThread also did handle the Connection and therefore close the socket after using it.
I then moved the code to the new Thread and forgot to remove that finally block!
You can't use a buffered input stream and another kind of stream on the same socket. The buffered stream will steal data from the other one. Make up your mind. The ObjectInputStream will do everything you need. Just use that.
EDIT Re your edit, 'socket closed' means that you closed your socket and then continued to use it.