I have a jar. I want the jar to be able to make a copy of itself while running. I understand windows may have problems with this. How would I do this, or am I over thinking it?
Edit: To explain a bit more....
I'm writing a repackagable firmware deployment system... http://code.google.com/p/heimdall-one-click/ The idea is that a ROM developer from XDA can make his own, then pack it up in a cross-platform deployable one-click packaging nearly as easily as it is to deploy the firmware.
My program takes alot of the work out by automating the tasks... I'm trying to automate packaging of the one-click deployable packaging system.... give the developers a form to fill out which will change the header information, then they select their firmware files to be deployed. I'm trying to keep it all in one jar.
As josh says, it would be nice if you tell why do you want to do this in order to help.
Answering only what have you post, copying the jar is just copying another file. There is the issue that it might be blocked by the OS (Windows); another issue is how do you locate it in the machine and if the user running the process has the permissions needed.
Once those two issues are solved, it is just a copy operation, the OS could not care less that if the order to copy comes from the process run from the file or from another one.
EDIT to asnwer changes in the first post.
As I told before, in the end copying a file is a OS issue. If you want to copy the current jar in Windows, then the jar must not be locked by other process so it becomes an OS question rather than a Java one.
Possible workarounds:
The faster (but dirtiest) is to launch a .bat that does a sleep of a few seconds and then does the copy. Immediately after launching it, your close your java app. If you need to continue doing things in Java, after copying the file, the .bat launches the java app again (with the appropiate parameters).
A variant of the previous is slightly sleazier... launch your java app from a .bat, and the first thing that .bat does is copying your jar to the PC temp directory. Be sure to document it well so your users do not get scared!
JNI library to unlock a file. There are several programs that (Unlocker) that try to unlock files; do not know to which point it is effective or how will it affect the JVM.
I believe you can use:
File file = new File(MyClass.class.getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource().getLocation().getPath());
to get a reference to the path to the .JAR file.
Then you just make a copy of it:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/io/copy.html
Your operating system might not allow this, but I think it should.
Related
Using Java, I want to move a file on the file system despite if it's being used by another process? I've found this for deleting FileDeleteStrategy.FORCE.delete() is there an equivalent one for moving the file into another directory?
As others already pointed out, on Windows there is no such thing as move file while it's being used by other process. There is however standard way of handling such situation, but it will require OS restart.
From documentation of MoveFileEx:
MOVEFILE_DELAY_UNTIL_REBOOT 4 (0x4)
The system does not move the file until the operating system is restarted. The system moves the file immediately after AUTOCHK is executed, but before creating any paging files.
To use this function from java application, you could use JNA, but your application needs to be running with admin privileges with appropriate UAC.
From UX point of view, Jared Smith's answer make much more sense.
Is there a way to change working dir for JVM when running Java Webstart?
When i use system.setProperties("user.dir", newDir) it sets it(system.getProperties() shows it does) but ignores it.
Is this a limitation in Java Webstart to always use the working dir where i started the jnlp file?
I am using all permissions in the jnlp file.
Please help!
EDIT: Whatever i do now, my webstart always uses user.dir to save files. Frustrating!
I've had this question in the past myself, but I've always found that, in the end, I didn't need it. Why do I say this?
Because your java web start app is not like an executable run from Program Files. It doesn't even exist on your computer like most programs (it is broken up into a bunch of different files and reassembled by the JVM). Therefore, you cannot say that the program has its own directory to do what it needs.
But it doesn't need to. Here's why:
Java has the Preferences API to help when you need to store data. The under-workings of the Preferences API is as mysterious as JWS, thus they are really a perfect fit. Either way, if you need to write things to a file, you should check this API to see if it can meet your needs.
If you need to write files for the user, then prompting them and allowing them to choose the location obviously means you won't use your current working directory to read/write files.
If you need to serialize objects, you should just create a program directory using the user.home resource as #AndrewThompson suggested. This will be "your" directory and is as good (in fact, better) than a directory in Program Files (if you're running on Windows, as an example).
In conclusion, in all cases (that I've come across), there's no need to change your current working directory. If you need your own folder, create one in user.home (because you won't run into file permissions issues there).
..all my settings file i use is created in the user.dir.
There is the mistake. Put them in a sub-directory of user.home & the problem is solved.
In the hypothesis you really really need to divert user.dir property for Java WebStart execution, here is the only option I have found: set this system environment variable (so system wide):
_JAVA_OPTIONS="-Duser.dir=C:\Temp"
But care about it, this option is read and applied to any JVM executions.
Why was it required in my context ? Because Java WebStart ClassLoader was looking for any single resource (class, properties...) in user profile before getting it from jar files in cache. As the user profile has been moved to a network storage, application start up became terribly slow. I am still investigating Java sources to understand (and avoid) this behavior. So my applications work perfectly without setting user.dir but that was the only work-around for the performance issue we got at the moment.
The recommended way to pass runtime parameters or user specific setting is through the jnlp argument
<application-desc main-class=".....">
<argument>user.home</argument>
..............
I was working on an update launcher for a java .jar application. I have several .jar-archives and a main.jar. My launcher adds/replaces the necessary jars when updating.
I am just not sure what criterias to look after. So I'll describe how the process works and you might tell me if I forgot something.
Load and compare version.xml file from ftp update server
Make a list of updated items with the help of both version.xml files
Check (to be sure) if those files which are still valid really do exist on hard drive (either add them to the list of items that needs to be downloaded...shouldn't happen anyway)
Create a list of files that needs to be downloaded (those items are on the server in a compressed form)
Download all needed files to /temp folder
Unpack all files to /temp/unpack
Move all unpacked files to /data folder (or where they belong to)
Update local version.xml
Check if all files match the actual version-file-list
I am really not sure if I forgot something? If some users mess around with files in /data my updater recognizes this and proposes a "repair-update" where all missing files are beeing redownloaded. But what about users messing around with version.xml? I should store that encrypted. Is it necessary to keep the downloaded version.xml from update server open so that noone can change while checking version and updating? Or am I worried too much about all that?
Does all this work out so far and is it secure enough to not creaty messy installations on a users pc after patch?
Do you intend to use the System Tray class from Java 1.6 to notify the user of the update? To me, it seems like something like this would involve implementing an OSGi updater (sorta like how Eclipse project does it in the IDE). Also, the JVisualVM.exe tool (that comes with JDK) is an excellent example of this sort of thing and maybe you could get ideas from that although I suspect its coded in C++.
I made a simple command-line based game in java, only two classes (using Eclipse). But I was wondering how I can make this into a usable application for anyone, without running it through eclipse (ie send it to someone who knows nothing about java but would still be able to play the game)? Thanks!
You want to create a runnable jar file.
Eclipse has an option for this in the "Export" menu. For more options, search for "executable jar file" here or on Google.
You want to make sure that you also include any jar files your code depends on as well (Eclipse can also do that for you).
Users will be able to start this by double-clicking on the file on most platforms. If you need better integration (such as a custom icon), you will need to bundle it up further into an OS-specific executable. But for starters, a simple runnable jar works fine.
send it to someone who knows nothing about java
You need to get them to at least install the Java runtime on their machine (if it is not already there).
Just to be clear, "command-line" and "knows nothing about java" are probably not going to work very well for you given that:
java is OS agnostic, therefore, if you send (presumably) a jar file to say...your grandma and she has a mac and you have a PC chances are her getting it to work is not going to be "out of the box easy" so to speak.
Left with this, I think you have a couple choices...first off, you do need to package your classes - a runnable jar will work fine. Aside from that, you will most likely have to build OS specific scripts (batch scripts for Windows, shell scripts for unix, etc.) and you will have to hand these out with your jar file. That being said, the intended user will still need to have java installed, and the batch scripts themselves are not likely to be trivial endeavors.
Your next option would be to use JNLP. However, I don't think JNLP has a command line mode, so you will likely have to simulate a console with something like a JTextArea.
As far as I see it, your last option it to use one of the many products (not sure if there are any free ones) that package java into native code. I think Exe4j is one such example - but, like I said, I am not sure if there are any free ones and I am not sure how hard they are to use.
Best of luck, and if you can't get your jar to work you should probably move that to its own question.
I have a Java app that runs on a Windows mobile device. At startup the app talks to our server to see if any files need updating and downloads them if they do. If any of the files are dlls they need to be stored in a temp directory and the device is rebooted because they might be currently in use. When the app starts it reads an xml file that lists all of the temp files and where they need to go and copies them into place.
A new requirement has come up that involves also updating the JVM files as part of this process. Since the code that does the copying is run on the JVM there is no way to do it since the files will always be in use. So we are looking at writing something in native code to do this copying process.
Before we start, I was just wondering if anyone knew of an already existing application or technique that does this (someone suggested a registry entry that tells the device to copy files on startup for example). Basically the requirement is to read some sort of configuration file that details the location of the source file and the destination then performs the copy. Any ideas before I reinvent the wheel by writing an app myself?
If your target handsets are handheld barcode scanners (Symbol, Intermec, etc.) they already have a framework in place for this. I don't have all the details, but I know from previous projects that they have a "protected" memory location that allows application to essentially re-configure / copy themselves from hard boots and similar problems. It might be worth seeing if any of that would work on your existing targets.
The scanners use either Windows CE or Windows Mobile.
In the absence of another answer, I have written a simple app to do it and put it in the startup directory. Was pretty easy, just didn't want to reinvent the wheel.
You can also rename your running executable file by the running-application itself. After this you can copy the file into the directory and simply restart your application.