We Keep Coding

Java 8 UTF-16 isn't default charset but UTF-8

I been doing some coding with String in Java8,Java 11 but this question is based on Java 8. I have this little snippet.
final char e = (char)200;//È
I just thought that the characters between 0.255[Ascii+extended Ascii] would always fit in a byte just because 2^8=256 but this seems not to be true i have try on the website https://mothereff.in/byte-counter and states that the character is taking 2 bytes can somebody please explain to me.
Another question in a lot of post states that Java is UTF-16 but in my machine running Windows 7 is returning UTF-8 in this snippet.
String csn = Charset.defaultCharset().name();
Is this platform depent?
Other questions i have try this snippet.
final List<Charset>charsets = Arrays.asList(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1,StandardCharsets.US_ASCII,StandardCharsets.UTF_16,StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
charsets.forEach(a->print(a,"È"));
System.out.println("getBytes");
System.out.println(Arrays.toString("È".getBytes()));
charsets.forEach(a->System.out.println(a+" "+Arrays.toString(sb.toString().getBytes(a))));
private void print(final Charset set,final CharSequence sb){
byte[] array = new byte[4];
set.newEncoder()
.encode(CharBuffer.wrap(sb), ByteBuffer.wrap(array), true);
final String buildedString = new String(array,set);
System.out.println(set+" "+Arrays.toString(array)+" "+buildedString+"<<>>"+buildedString.length());
}
And prints
run:
ISO-8859-1 [-56, 0, 0, 0] È//PERFECT USING 1 BYTE WHICH IS -56
US-ASCII [0, 0, 0, 0] //DONT GET IT SEE THIS ITEM FOR LATER
UTF-16 [-2, -1, 0, -56] È<<>>1 //WHAT IS -2,-1 BYTE USED FOR? I HAVE TRY WITH OTHER EXAMPLES AND THEY ALWAYS APPEAR AM I LOSING TWO BYTES HERE??
UTF-8 [-61, -120, 0, 0] 2 È //SEEMS TO MY CHARACTER NEEDS TWO BYTES?? I THOUGHT THAT CODE=200 WOULD REQUIRE ONLY ONE
getBytes
[-61, -120]//OK MY UTF-8 REPRESENTATION
ISO-8859-1 [-56]//OK
US-ASCII [63]//OK BUT WHY WHEN I ENCODE IN ASCCI DOESNT GET ANY BYTE ENCODED?
UTF-16 [-2, -1, 0, -56]//AGAIN WHAT ARE -2,-1 IN THE LEADING BYTES?
UTF-8 [-61, -120]//OK
I have try
System.out.println(new String(new byte[]{-1,-2},"UTF-16"));//SIMPLE "" I AM WASTING THIS 2 BYTES??
In resume.
Why UTF-16 always has two leading bytes are they wasted? new byte[]{-1,-2}
Why when i encode "È" i dont get any bytes in ASCCI Charset but when i do È.getBytes(StandardCharsets.US_ASCII) i get {63}?
Java uses UTF-16 but in my case UTF-8 is platform depend??
Sorry if this post is confussing
Environment
Windows 7 64 Bits Netbeans 8.2 with Java 1.8.0_121

First question
For your first question: those bytes are the BOM code and they specify the byte order (whether the least or most significant comes first) of multibyte encoding such as UTF-16.
Second question
Every ASCII character can be encoded as a single byte in UTF-8. But ASCII is not an 8-bit encoding, it uses 7 bits for every character. And in fact, all Unicode character with code points >= 128 require at least two bytes. (The reason is that you need a way to distinguish between 200 and a multibyte code point whose first byte happens to be 200. UTF-8 solves this by using the bytes >= 128 to represent multibyte codepoints.)
'È' is not an ASCII character, so it cannot be represented in ASCII. This explains the second output: 63 is ASCII for the character '?'. And indeed, the Javadoc for the getBytes(Charset) method specifies that unmappable input is mapped to "the default replacement byte array", in this case '?'. On the other hand, to obtain the first ASCII byte array you used the CharsetEncoder directly, which is a more low-level API and does not perform such automatic replacements. (When you would have checked the result of the encode method, you would have found it to have returned a CoderResult instance representing an error.)
Third question
Java 8 Strings use UTF-16 internally, but when communicating with other software, different encodings may be expected, such as UTF-8. The Charset.defaultCharset() method returns the default character set of the virtual machine, which depends on the locale and character set of the operating system, not on the encoding used internally by Java strings.

Let's back up a bit…
Java's text datatypes use the UTF-16 character encoding of the Unicode character set. (As do, VB4/5/6/A/Script, JavaScript, .NET, ….) You can see this in the various operations you do with the string API: indexing, length, ….
Libraries support converting between the text datatypes and byte arrays using various encodings. Some of them are categorized as "Extended ASCII", but stating that is a very poor substitute for naming the character encoding actually being used.
Some operating systems allow the user to designate a default character encoding. (Most users don't know or care, though.) Java attempts to pick this up. It is only useful when the program understands that input from the user is that character encoding or that output should be. This century, users dealing in text files prefer to use a specific encoding, communicate them unchanged across systems, don't appreciate lossy conversions and therefore don't have any use for this concept. From a program's point of view, it is never what you want unless it is exactly what you want.
Where a conversion would be lossy, you have the choice of a replacement character (such a '?'), omitting it, or throwing an exception.
A character encoding is a map between a codepoint (integer) of a character set and one or more code units, according to the definition of the encoding. A code unit is a fixed size and the number of code units needed for a codepoint, might vary by codepoint.
In libraries, it is not generally useful to have an array of code units so they take the further step of converting to/from an array of bytes. byte values do range from -128 to 127, however, that's the Java interpretation as two's complement 8-bit integers. As the bytes are understood to be encoding text, the values would be interpret according to the rules of the character encoding.
Because some Unicode encodings, have code units more than one byte long, byte order becomes important. So, at the byte array level, there is UTF-16 Big Endian and UTF-16 Little Endian. When communicating a text file or stream, you would send the bytes and well as having a shared knowledge of the encoding. This "metadata" is required for understanding. So, UTF-16BE or UTF-16LE, for example. To make that a bit easier, Unicode allows some metadata beginning of the file or stream to indicate the byte order. It is called the byte-order mark (BOM) So, the external metadata can share the encoding (say, UTF-16), while the internal metadata shares the byte order. Unicode allows the BOM to be present even when byte order is not relevant, such as UTF-8. So, if the understanding is that the bytes are text encoded with any Unicode encoding and a BOM is present, then it's a very simple matter to figure out which Unicode encoding it is and what the byte order is, if relavent.
1) You are seeing the BOM in some of your Unicode encoding outputs.
2) È is not in the ASCII character set. What would want to happen in this case? I often prefer an exception.
3) The system you were using, for your account, at the time of your tests, may have had UTF-8 as the default character encoding, Is that important to the way you want and have encoded your text files on that system?

When I assign char (from literal or otherwise), what "java internal encoding is UTF16" means here? In what encoding is it stored in char?

//non-utf source file encoding
char ch = 'ё'; // some number within 0..65535 is stored in char.
System.out.println(ch); // the same number output to
"java internal encoding is UTF16". Where does it meanfully come to play in that?
Besides, I can perfectly put into char one utf16 codeunit from surrogate range (say '\uD800') - making this char perfectly invalid Unicode. And let us stay within BMP, so to avoid thinking that we might have 2 chars (codeunits) for a supplementary symbol (thinking this way sounds to me that "char internally uses utf16" is complete nonsense). But maybe "char internally uses utf16" makes sense within BMP?
I could undersand it if were like this: my source code file is in windows-1251 encoding, char literal is converted to number according to windows-1251 encoding (what really happens), then this number is automatically converted to another number (from windows-1251 number to utf-16 number) - which is NOT taking place (am I right?! this I could understand as "internally uses UTF-16"). And then that stored number is written to (really it is written as given, as from win-1251, no my "imaginary conversion from internal utf16 to output\console encoding" taking place), console shows it converting from number to glyph using console encoding (what really happens)
So this "UTF16 encoding used internally" is NEVER USED ANYHOW ??? char just stores any number (in [0..65535]), and besides specific range and being "unsigned" has NO DIFFERENCE FROM int (in scope of my example of course)???
P.S. Experimentally, code above with UTF-8 encoding of source file and console outputs
й
1081
with win-1251 encoding of source file and UTF-8 in console outputs
�
65533
Same output if we use String instead of char...
String s = "й";
System.out.println(s);
In API, all methods taking char as argument usually never take encoding as argument. But methods taking byte[] as argument often take encoding as another argument. Implying that with char we don't need encoding (meaning that we know this encoding for sure). But **how on earth do we know in what encoding something was put into char???
If char is just a storage for a number, we do need to understand what encoding this number originally came from?**
So char vs byte is just that char has two bytes of something with UNKNOWN encoding (instead of one byte of UNKNOWN encoding for a byte).
Given some initialized char variable, we don't know what encoding to use to correctly display it (to choose correct console encoding for output), we cannot tell what was encoding of source file where it was initialized with char literal (not counting cases where various encodings and utf would be compatilble).
Am I right, or am I a big idiot? Sorry for asking in latter case :)))
SO research shows no direct answer to my question:
In what encoding is a Java char stored in?
What encoding is used when I type a character?
To which character encoding (Unicode version) set does a char object
correspond?

In most cases it is best to think of a char just as a certain character (independent of any encoding), e.g. the character 'A', and not as a 16-bit value in some encoding. Only when you convert between char or a String and a sequence of bytes does the encoding play a role.
The fact that a char is internally encoded as UTF-16 is only important if you have to deal with it's numeric value.
Surrogate pairs are only meaningful in a character sequence. A single char can not hold a character value outside the BMP. This is where the character abstraction breaks down.

Unicode is system of expressing textual data as codepoints. These are typically characters, but not always. A Unicode codepoint is always represented in some encoding. The common ones are UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32, where the number indicates the number of bits in a codeunit. (For example UTF-8 is encoded as 8-bit bytes, and UTF-16 is encoded as 16-bit words.)
While the first version of Unicode only allowed code points in the range 0hex ... FFFFhex, in Unicode 2.0, they changed the range to 0hex to 10FFFFhex.
So, clearly, a Java (16 bit) char is no longer big enough to represent every Unicode code point.
This brings us back to UTF-16. A Java char can represent Unicode code points that are less or equal to FFFFhex. For larger codepoints, the UTF-16 representation consists of 2 16-bit values; a so-called surrogate pair. And that will fit into 2 Java chars. So in fact, the standard representation of a Java String is a sequence of char values that constitute the UTF-16 representation of the Unicode code points.
If we are working with most modern languages (including CJK with simplified characters), the Unicode code points of interest are all found in code plane zero (0hex through FFFFhex). If you can make that assumption, then it is possible to treat a char as a Unicode code point. However, increasingly we are seeing code points in higher planes. A common case is the code points for Emojis.)
If you look at the javadoc for the String class, you will see a bunch of methods line codePointAt, codePointCount and so on. These allow you to handle text data properly ... that is to deal with the surrogate pair cases.
So how does this relate to UTF-8, windows-1251 and so on?
Well these are 8-bit character encodings that are used at the OS level in text files and so on. When you read a file using a Java Reader your text is effectively transcoded from UTF-8 (or windows-1251) into UTF-16. When you write characters out (using a Writer) you transcode in the other direction.
This doesn't always work.
Many character encodings such as windows-1251 are not capable of representing the full range of Unicode codepoints. So, if you attempt to write (say) a CJK character via a Writer configured a windows-1251, you will get ? characters instead.
If you read an encoded file using the wrong character encoding (for example, if you attempt to read a UTF-8 file as windows-1251, or vice versa) then the trancoding is liable to give garbage. This phenomenon is so common it has a name: Mojibake).
You asked:
Does that mean that in char ch = 'й'; literal 'й' is always converted to utf16 from whatever encoding source file was in?
Now we are (presumably) talking about Java source code. The answer is that it depends. Basically, you need to make sure that the Java compiler uses the correct encoding to read the source file. This is typically specified using the -encoding command line option. (If you don't specify the -encoding then the "platform default converter" is used; see the javac manual entry.)
Assuming that you compile your source code with the correct encoding (i.e. matching the actual representation in the source file), the Java compiler will emit code containing the correct UTF-16 representation of any String literals.
However, note that this is independent of the character encoding that your application uses to read and write files at runtime. That encoding is determined by what your application selects or the execution platform's default encoding.

How do I convert a single character code to a `char` given a character set?

I want to convert decimal to ascii and this is the code returns the unexpected results. Here is the code I am using.
public static void main(String[] args) {
char ret= (char)146;
System.out.println(ret);// returns nothing.
I expect to get character single "'" as per http://www.ascii-code.com/
Anyone came across this? Thanks.

So, a couple of things.
First of all the page you linked to says this about the code point range in question:
The extended ASCII codes (character code 128-255)
There are several different variations of the 8-bit ASCII table. The table below is according to ISO 8859-1, also called ISO Latin-1. Codes 128-159 contain the Microsoft® Windows Latin-1 extended characters.
This is incorrect, or at least, to me, misleadingly worded. ISO 8859-1 / Latin-1 does not define code point 146 (and another reference just because). So that's already asking for trouble. You can see this also if you do the conversion through String:
String s = new String(new byte[] {(byte)146}, "iso-8859-1");
System.out.println(s);
Outputs the same "unexpected" result. It appears that what they are actually referring to is the Windows-1252 set (aka "Windows Latin-1", but this name is almost completely obsolete these days), which does define that code point as a right single quote (for other charsets that provide this character at 146 see this list and look for encodings that provide it at 0x92), and we can verify this as such:
String s = new String(new byte[] {(byte)146}, "windows-1252");
System.out.println(s);
So the first mistake is that page is confusing.
But the big mistake is you can't do what you're trying to do in the way you are doing it. A char in Java is a UTF-16 code point (or half of one, if you're representing the supplementary characters > 0xFFFF, a single char corresponds to a BMP point, a pair of them or an int corresponds to the full range, including the supplementary ones).
Unfortunately, Java doesn't really expose a lot of API for single-character conversions. Even Character doesn't have any readily available ways to convert from the charset of your choice to UTF-16.
So one option is to do it via String as hinted at in the examples above, e.g. express your code points as a raw byte[] array and convert from there:
String s = new String(new byte[] {(byte)146}, "windows-1252");
System.out.println(s);
char c = s.charAt(0);
System.out.println(c);
You could grab the char again via s.charAt(0). Note that you have to be mindful of your character set when doing this. Here we know that our byte sequence is valid for the specified encoding, and we know that the result is only one char long, so we can do this.
However, you have to watch out for things in the general case. For example, perhaps your byte sequence and character set yield a result that is in the UTF-16 supplementary character range. In that case s.charAt(0) would not be sufficient and s.codePointAt(0) stored in an int would be required instead.
As an alternative, with the same caveats, you could use Charset to decode, although it's just as clunky, e.g.:
Charset cs = Charset.forName("windows-1252");
CharBuffer cb = cs.decode(ByteBuffer.wrap(new byte[] {(byte)146}));
char c = cb.get(0);
System.out.println(c);
Note that I am not entirely sure how Charset#decode handles supplementary characters and can't really test right now (but anybody, feel free to chime in).
As an aside: In your case, 146 (0x92) cast directly to char corresponds to the UTF-16 character "PRIVATE USE TWO" (see also), and all bets are off for what you'll end up displaying there. This character is classified by Unicode as a control character, and seems to fall in the range of characters reserved for ANSI terminal control (although AFAIK isn't actually used, but it's in that range regardless). I wouldn't be surprised if perhaps browsers in some locales rendered it as a right-single-quote for compatibility, but terminals did something weird with it.
Also, fyi, the official UTF-16 code point for right single quote is 0x2019. You could reliably store that in a char by using that value, e.g.:
System.out.println((char)0x2019);
You can also see this for yourself by looking at the value after the conversion from windows-1252:
String s = new String(new byte[] {(byte)146}, "windows-1252");
char c = s.charAt(0);
System.out.printf("0x%x\n", (int)c); // outputs 0x2019
Or, for completeness:
String s = new String(new byte[] {(byte)146}, "windows-1252");
int cp = s.codePointAt(0);
System.out.printf("0x%x\n", cp); // outputs 0x2019

The page you refer mention that values 160 to 255 correspond to the ISO-8859-1 (aka Latin 1) table; as for values in the range 128 to 159, they are from the Windows specific variant of the Latin 1 (ISO-8859-1 leave that range undefined, to be assigned by operating system).
Java characters are based on UTF16, which is itself based on the Unicode table. If you want to specifically refer to the right quote character, it is you can specify it as '\u2019' in Java (see http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2019/index.htm).

Will String.getBytes("UTF-16") return the same result on all platforms?

I need to create a hash from a String containing users password. To create the hash, I use a byte array which I get by calling String.getBytes(). But when I call this method with specified encoding, (such as UTF-8) on a platform where this is not the default encoding, the non-ASCII characters get replaced by a default character (if I understand the behaviour of getBytes() correctly) and therefore on such platform, I will get a different byte array, and eventually a different hash.
Since Strings are internally stored in UTF-16, will calling String.getBytes("UTF-16") guarantee me that I get the same byte array on every platform, regardless of its default encoding?

Yes. Not only is it guaranteed to be UTF-16, but the byte order is defined too:
When decoding, the UTF-16 charset interprets the byte-order mark at the beginning of the input stream to indicate the byte-order of the stream but defaults to big-endian if there is no byte-order mark; when encoding, it uses big-endian byte order and writes a big-endian byte-order mark.
(The BOM isn't relevant when the caller doesn't ask for it, so String.getBytes(...) won't include it.)
So long as you have the same string content - i.e. the same sequence of char values - then you'll get the same bytes on every implementation of Java, barring bugs. (Any such bug would be pretty surprising, given that UTF-16 is probably the simplest encoding to implement in Java...)
The fact that UTF-16 is the native representation for char (and usually for String) is only relevant in terms of ease of implementation, however. For example, I'd also expect String.getBytes("UTF-8") to give the same results on every platform.

It is true, java uses Unicode internally so it may combine any script/language. String and char use UTF-16BE but .class files store there String constants in UTF-8. In general it is irrelevant what String does, as there is a conversion to bytes specifying the encoding the bytes have to be in.
If this encoding of the bytes cannot represent some of the Unicode characters, a placeholder character or question mark is given. Also fonts might not have all Unicode characters, 35 MB for a full Unicode font is a normal size. You might then see a square with 2x2 hex codes or so for missing code points. Or on Linux another font might substitute the char.
Hence UTF-8 is a perfect fine choice.
String s = ...;
if (!s.startsWith("\uFEFF")) { // Add a Unicode BOM
s = "\uFEFF" + s;
}
byte[] bytes = s.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
Both UTF-16 (in both byte orders) and UTF-8 always are present in the JRE, whereas some Charsets are not. Hence you can use a constant from StandardCharsets not needing to handle any UnsupportedEncodingException.
Above I added a BOM for Windows Notepad esoecially, to recognize UTF-8. It certainly is not good practice. But as a small help here.
There is no disadvantage to UTF16-LE or UTF-16BE. I think UTF-8 is a bit more universally used, as UTF-16 also cannot store all Unicode code points in 16 bits. Text is Asian scripts would be more compressed, but already HTML pages are more compact in UTF-8 because of the HTML tags and other latin script.
For Windows UTF-16LE might be more native.
Problem with placeholders for non-Unicode platforms, especially Windows, might happen.

I just found this:
https://github.com/facebook/conceal/issues/138
which seems to answer negatively your question.
As per Jon Skeet's answer: the specification is clear. But I guess Android/Mac implementations of Dalvik/JVM don't agree.

Encoding a string in 128c barcode symbology

I am having some trouble with encoding this string into barcode symbology - Code 128.
Text to encode:
1021448642241082212700794828592311
I am using the universal encoder from idautomation.com:
https://www.bcgen.com/fontencoder/
I get the following output for the encoded text for Code 128:
Í*5LvJ8*r5;ÂoP<[7+.Î
However, in ";Âo" the character between the semi-colon and o (let us call it special A) - is not part of the extended character set used in Code128. (See the Latin Supplements at https://www.fonts2u.com/code-128.font)
Yet the same string shows a valid barcode at
https://www.bcgen.com/linear-barcode-creator.html
How?
If I use the output with the Special A on a webpage with a font face for barcodes, the special A character does not show up as the barcode (and that seems correct since the special A is not part of the character set).
What gives? Please help.
I am using the IDAutomation utility to encode the string to 128c symbology. If you can share code to do the encoding (in Java/Python/C/Perl) that would help too.

There are multiple fonts for Code128 that may use different characters to represent the barcode symbols. Make sure the font and the encoding logic match each other.
I used this one http://www.jtbarton.com/Barcodes/Code128.aspx (there is also sample code how to encode it on the site, but you have to translate it from VB). The font works for all three encodings (A, B and C).

Sorry, this is very late.
When you are dealing with the encoding of code 128, in any subset, it's a good idea to think of that coding in terms of numbers, not characters. At this level, when you have shifts, code-changes, checksums and stuff, intermixed with the data, the whole concept of "character" is lost.
However, this is what is happening:
The semicolon in the output corresponds to "27"
The lowercase o corresponds to "48" and the P to "79"
The "A with Macron" corresponds to your "00" sequence. This is why you should be dealing with numbers, not characters, at this level of encoding.
How would you expect it to show a character with a code of 00 ? That would be a space of NULL, neither of which is particularly visible.
Your software has simply rendered it the best way it can, which is to make the character 'visible' by adding 0x80 to it. If you look at charmap, you will see that code 0x80 is indeed A with macron.
The rest (indeed all) of your encoded string looks correct for a setc-encodation.