We Keep Coding

Creating EJB 3.0 or 3.1

I would be very much thankful to clear me some question about this new EJB3.0 and above version:
1) if suppose I need ejbCreate, ejbActivate and all other events so how can I get it from the new EJB3.0 and above ver.
2) I always have problem to find particular xml file to alocate a JNDI name according to variety of Application Servers so is there any way that I can give JNDI name without xml file and can also be use a portable name that in every Application Server it can be findable of EJB deployed on app server remotely
3)Can any buddy tell me, i have hosting plan of Java/Linux which supports
i) Tomcat - 5.5.xSupport
ii)JDK - 1.6.x Support
iii)JSP/servlet - 2.0 Support
can it be possible that EJB 3.1 be deployed because some where i have got that tomcat is not able to deploy EJB so please give me some advice help...
Thank You...!!!
please Help me...!!!

1) if suppose i need ejbCreate, ejbActivate and all other events so
how can i get it from the new EJB3.0 and above ver.
In EJB 3 and above, the EJB lifecycle is handled through life cycle annotations, such as: #PostConstruct and #PreDestroy.
2) i always have problem to find perticular xml file to alocate a JNDI
name according to variety of Application Servers so is there any way
that i can give JNDI name without xml file and can also be use a
portable name that in every Application Server it can be findable of
EJB deployed on app server remotly
The #Stateless and #Stateful annotations have two attributes that might solve this issue (name and mappedName). Yet
The mapped name is product-dependent and often installation-dependent.
Hope it helps you.

1) ejbCreate, ejbActivate etc. are related to EJB 2.x, if you need similar functionality in EJB 3.x, you should decorate your methods with annotations #PostActivate, #PrePassivate etc. Method signature should follow certain rules, example for #PostActivate:
The method annotated with #PostActivate must follow these
requirements:
The return type of the method must be void.
The method must not throw a checked exception.
The method may be public, protected, package private or private.
The method must not be static.
The method must not be final.
This annotation does not have any attributes.
2) It seems that you're referring to name and mappedName attributes of #Stateless and #Stateful annotations. For more details see official documentation. From my experience mappedName is better, but it's application-server-specific, e.g. on Glassfish it works perfectly. Example:
#Stateless(mappedName="ejb/myBean")
public class MyFirstBean {
..
}

Since no one answered Question 3 ..
3)Can any buddy tell me, i have hosting plan of Java/Linux which supports i) Tomcat - > 5.5.xSupport ii)JDK - 1.6.x Support iii)JSP/servlet - 2.0 Support
No, you are going to need a server that supports Java EE. Read How to deploy EJB based application on Tomcat

Configuring and looking up a simple String via JNDI in WebSphere

For the configuration of our applications we want to place some of the configuration in the application server.
We are currently using the WebSphere JNDI facility for looking up urls and datasources.
In addition we want to place simple Strings in the application server. We don't want to use the WebSphere "Enviroment variables".
Can the "Resource Environment" be used for such a purpose? If so, how can it be used?
We'd like to get the Strings with:
InitialContext ctx = new InitalContext();
String myString = (String)ctx.lookup("jndi/string/myString");
Are there any more simple alternatives?
We are using WebSphere Application Server 7.

I believe you can use Name Space Bindings for this (under Environment, Naming, Name Space Bindings.)
Blurb:
Name Space Bindings
Use this page to configure a name binding of a constant string value,
an enterprise bean, a CORBA CosNaming Naming Context or CORBA leaf
node object, or an object that can be looked up by using JNDI.

Take a look at the article Using resource environment providers in WebSphere Application Server
It's written for WebSphere 5 or 6 but the idea should work for version 7 too. Basically you create a custom resource environment provider, which returns objects of your own type via a factory. The factory implements javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactory and gets its input from Websphere.
In my opinion this is a nice solution if you have a few configuration parameters but it can quickly become hard to maintain as the number of parameters grows.

Packaging EJBs in Java EE server

I have deployed an enterprise app in an EAR and a standalone web app in WAR (out side of the EAR) to the same Java EE server.
Question is can I access the local interface of the session bean in the EAR from the standalone WAR? if so can I use dependency injection (DI)?

Section 3.2.2 of the EJB 3.1 specification explicitly states that this is not portable:
Access to an enterprise bean through
the local client view is only required
to be supported for local clients
packaged within the same application
as the enterprise bean that provides
the local client view. Compliant
implementations of this specification
may optionally support access to the
local client view of an enterprise
bean from a local client packaged in a
different application. The
configuration requirements for
inter-application access to the local
client view are vendor-specific and
are outside the scope of this
specification. Applications relying on
inter-application access to the local
client view are non-portable.
In general, the solution will require at a minimum:
Some mechanism for allowing both the EAR and WAR class loaders to have visibility to the same interface class.
Some mechanism for looking up a local interface from another application. For example, java:global.

The answer anyway to both your questions is yes.
Since both the ear and war are in the same JVM, a local interface can be used. To get an instance of the session bean, you would use the global JNDI name of said bean to do either a JNDI lookup or use with the mappedName property on the #EJB annotation. Those names are standardized via the following pattern:
java:global[/<app-name>]/<module-name>/<bean-name>[!<fully-qualified-interface-name>]
Lookup would thus be if the name of your ear is my_app, your bean is MyBean.java and its local interface is com.foo.SomeBeanLocal:
InitialContext ctx = InitialContext();
SomeBeanLocal someBean = (SomeBeanLocal) ctx.lookup("java:global/my_ear/SomeBean/com.foo.SomeBeanLocal");
Injection would be:
public SomeManagedClass {
#EJB(mappedName="java:global/my_ear/SomeBean/com.foo.SomeBeanLocal")
SomeBeanLocal someBean;
}
There are two catches however:
Non-standard naming
Older Java EE implementations (e.g. JBoss AS 5.1, Glassfish 2, Websphere) used their own naming pattern. E.g. JBoss AS 5.x would use:
<app-name>/<bean-name>/local|global
E.g. with the same names as the previous example, the global JNDI name of that bean in JBoss AS 5.1 would be:
my_app/MyBean/local
As said, other old application servers might use other names.
Startup-order
Especially with injection you have to assure somehow that the application you want to inject from has been started before the application you want to inject into. I.e. in your case that the EAR has been started before the standalone WAR. There are no standard mechanisms for this. You might be just lucky that it happens to be in the right order for you. This order might be influenced by time-stamps, alphabetical order of application names, or something else entirely.
JBoss AS for example uses <depends> tags in many of its proprietary configuration files, which is perfectly suited for this although it can be hard to find out what exactly you need to depend on (the syntax can be very cryptic).

Custom resource in JNDI on different application servers

Preface:
Most of J2EE applications are using container managed datasources through JNDI. This is fine as it gives one place for configuring these connections.
The problem arises when we want to use ORM framework (like hibernate) or something that have to know the default schema (mostly for Oracle, may be others too), which can be different from the username that is used to connect to the DB.
I want to put the default schema name somewhere close to the datasource definition. One of the options would be to put it in JNDI. I will then manually read of from there before construction the EntityManager (well actually using Spring).
As I found out there is a simple way to specify custom resource (in this situation it will be String with default schema name) in Apache Tomcat like this (correct me if I'm wrong):
<Environment name="schemaNames/EmployeeDB"
type="java.lang.String"
value="empl"
description="Schema name of Employees Database for HR Applications"/>
Anyway, considering this can be done in Apache Tomcat, how should I configure the same custom JNDI resource (of String type) within other application servers:
JBoss 4/5
WebSphere 6/7
WebLogic 9/10
If you know about other servers that would be great too.
Also, as an alternative I don't want to put the schema name in system properties or environment variables.
Thank you very much !
Update:
Found some way of achieving it on JBoss. I didn't test it tho.
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=316228
Found information for WebLogic, but they talk about doing it programmaticly and not with configuration:
http://weblogic-wonders.com/weblogic/2010/06/12/binding-objects-in-weblogic-servers-jndi-tree/
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=4397353

For WebSphere you can actually set the default schema in your defined DataSource. It is a custom property called currentSchema. (ie, in V7 it is Resources > JDBC > Data sources > your data source name > Custom properties > currentSchema.
Otherwise you can use a Name Space Binding and define it there: (ie, in V7 it is Environment > Naming > Name Space Bindings. You can use JNDI to look this up if you don't want to programmatically set it in WebSphere.
Can't speak to JBoss and WebLogic as I haven't worked with them.

If you are using Hibernate, this is the property to add in persistence unit :
<property name="hibernate.default_schema" value="myschema" />
That is the prefix that JPA will insert for table names.
If you need something 'closer' to the AS Datasources definitions, you may inject some DB-specific SQL at DB connection time; for instance Oracle,
ALTER SESSION SET CURRENT_SCHEMA =
On JBoss, you may add this in the datasource definition :
<new-connection-sql>
ALTER SESSION SET CURRENT_SCHEMA=myschema
</new-connection-sql>
Also editable in JBoss 7 Admin.
On Weblogic, you may inject this in the Connection Pools.
On Websphere, this should be similar.

On JBoss, you can use a special MBean(org.jboss.naming.JNDIBindingServiceMgr) and a service.xml to configure JNDI-entries, and then map these entries into your webapps. There is a lengthy explication for this rather non-trivial process here:
http://usna86-techbits.blogspot.com/2011/01/jboss-jndi-and-javacompenv.html
I'm still looking for a a way to place an entire properties-file/resourcebundle into jndi, as this manual mapping gets very tedious when you have a lot of properties that you want to put into jndi and make available for your webapps.

This same problem has been bothering be for quite a while for WebLogic, in particular 10.3.5 (11g).
I spent most of a day looking around and all I found was this: http://code.google.com/p/weblogic-jndi-startup/. It works just fine. It is a little restrictive: it requires the object you want to add to JNDI to have a constructor with a single String parameter.
For what I needed, weblogic-jndi-startup didn't work, so I built on Roger's code and came up with this: https://bitbucket.org/phillip_green_idmworks/weblogic-jndi-custom-resource-configuration/. I have a write up for it at http://coder-in-training.blogspot.com/2012/03/weblogic-jndi-custom-resource.html

is there a standard way to define a JDBC Datasource for Java EE containers?

I know that for JBoss you need a [name]-ds.xml file in the /deploy subdirectory of the appropriate instance.
i dont have any experience with other Java EE containers, but im trying to stick to standards as much as possible.
is there a standard way to define a JDBC datasource and deploy it ? if possible i'd like to include my datasource inside the *.ear file (for instance, an embedded in-memory HSQLDB datasource for demo purposes) ?
if there is no standard way, will other containers at least accept the jboss way ? (/deploy/*-ds.xml)

Is there a standard way to define a JDBC datasource and deploy it?
Yes, there is. It's done via the <data-source> element, which you can put in web.xml, ejb-jar.xml and application.xml. If you don't like XML, you can also use an annotation for this instead: #DataSourceDefinition
Example of a web.xml entry
<data-source>
<name>java:app/myDS</name>
<class-name>org.postgresql.xa.PGXADataSource</class-name>
<server-name>pg.myserver.com</server-name>
<database-name>my_db</database-name>
<user>foo</user>
<password>bla</password>
<transactional>true</transactional>
<isolation-level>TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED</isolation-level>
<initial-pool-size>2</initial-pool-size>
<max-pool-size>10</max-pool-size>
<min-pool-size>5</min-pool-size>
<max-statements>0</max-statements>
</data-source>
Further reading:
Introducing the DataSourceDefinition Annotation
The state of #DataSourceDefinition in Java EE
Example application use standard data source
p.s. I'm surprised all other answers say this doesn't exist, while it clearly does, even at the time this question was originally asked.

Is there a standard way to define a JDBC datasource and deploy it ?
No, this is container specific. As Application Component Provider, you're supposed to document the resources you need and the Application deployer and Administrator will configure them.
If there is no standard way, will other containers at least accept the JBoss way?
No, because this is the JBoss way and thus JBoss specific.
With Tomcat, you would have to use the context.xml file.
With Jetty, jetty-env.xml.
With WebSphere, you can create a so called WebSphere Enhanced EAR.
With WebLogic, you can package a JDBC Module in your application.
With GlassFish, you can use the command asadmin add-resources my.xml to add a datasource described in a XML file (example here).
Etc, etc.
Note that there are some projects trying to achieve this goal in a universal way like jndi-resources or Cargo. There are also more complex solution like ControlTier or Chef.
Now, in your case (as I understood you want to use an embedded database that will be bundled with your application), I don't think you should configure a datasource at the application server level. You should just package the jar of your database in your application with a standalone connection pool like c3p0 or DBCP.

Sun's Java EE philosophy defines several roles in the design, development and deployment of an enterprise application. Java EE design accommodates and reflects these separations of concerns.
In particular Sun wants to separate the developer from the administrator of an application, which is a good idea. The developer writes enterprise components in a container-agnostic way. In web.xml, for example, you do declare your DataSources in a standard way:
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/myDB</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
This says "this database thing the application needs, make it available to me, whatever database is and whatever container you're running it in, via standard JNDI at 'jdbc/myDB' ". This is as much as the developer can do -- the rest is necessarily container specific and therefore not standardized.
And then how "myDB" is actually configured is up to a different role, the administrator of the container.
So I'm repeating the correct answer above: no. But the reason is, otherwise, you'd be coding your app to a specific type of database on a specific host and port, and the point is that you shouldn't be able to do that, so there's no standard support for that on purpose.