We Keep Coding

Is it possible to use more than one framework at the backend(Spring boot + Django)?

tl;dr: Is Spring + Django back-end possible?
When I was new to industry and was still working my way around the office, I got interested in Django and created a very small, basic-level application using the framework. When I got to meet my team after a few weeks, they said to go for Spring framework. After spending half a year on the framework and the main proj, I finally started to get time to start working off-hours. But, I don't want to lose both the skills - My teammate(when we were still in office ;) ) once told me that they worked on a project that started with python code, and then later added features using Java. And I am unable to find any helpful google searches(mostly showing Spring vs Django).
How should I go about it? Is it too much to ask for? Is it worthwhile? Will I learn some new concepts of application architecture a noob like me would have missed. Please provide me with some insight.
Are there resources(docs) I can go through?
P.S. I'm not a diehard fan of either of the frameworks right now, just another coder testing waters.

You can't write java in python.
You can extend Python with C/C++ which is quite common: Extending Python with C or C++
And about the part that they told that they added features with java:
It's common to create different parts of a project using different languages and tools. Microservice architecture is a common architecture for these kinds of use cases. You basically code different parts of the project in a language you want and then you connect all the parts using different methods like REST APIs, gRPC and etc.
Imagine you are creating a website like youtube that lets others upload videos. There is a form that users upload their files and you store them in your storage and then you have to encode the video file for different qualities. You can code the form handler using Python and Django to store the files in your storage. Then you can code another service using java that handles the encoding part which is a heavy process. When an upload is completed, you send the file or file path to your java service using an internal REST API and tell the service to start encoding the video and notify the Django service and then the Django service will publish the video on the feed that can itself be written in another language.

I would say go for 1 framework and stick with it. For example Django if you want to code in python, and spring if you want to code in java. Learning both frameworks however brings a lot of value, because you can compare their benefits (eg. spring forces you to write clean code, django has build-in and simpler database management)
I like Django's build-in tooling a lot, you only need to know python for it to work. Spring requires a bit more knowledge of eg. hibernate for database management. However I predict Django will outgrow spring at some point, because of cloud valuing fast iteration over code and quick startup time (auto-scaling apps) over large overhead apps and long boot times. Hoever, if you like java, I can recommend JHipster for java/spring webapp development to get up to speed very fast and learning the ways of REST CRUD api fast.
To combine 2 programs: write your main logic in one app, and write a small service in the second language, making sure its independent of the first app (no back and forth communication and complicated logic, but simple independent request/response, as if the main app was never there). Add a REST api to the second app and use eg. http requests to communicate.
What's possible in terms of combining languages:
connect different applications with each other: by letting them communicate through their APIs. For example a python api developed with flask or django can send requests to a java api developed with spring, as long as they have a way to communicate (eg over http, or via some queue like rabbitmq)
connect a webapp to 2 different backends: by using a shared authentication system: For example a keycloak authentication server to handle tokens, that your backend applications know about.
What's not possible (and also not preferable):
combining java with python code in the same program: there are some hacky ways to get it to work, but its asking for trouble and not readable.

What is the advantage of using Direct Web Remoting over a REST web services design?

I have an enterprise Java web application deployed in tomcat.
I am looking for ways to integrate a HTML & JS UI with the mid tier java code. So far, from looking around I have read that there are two ways to do this which fit my requirements :
1) DWR - Direct web remoting
2) Use REST web services.
I am not sure which approach to use.
Edit: What is the advantage of using DWR over a rest WS design?
Is there a better approach available? Some people asked me to have a look at GWT, but I am not sure if these are scalable.
Edit 2: I will most likely be using dojo for the UI development(Works well with REST/DWR??), and I want to keep the java code chages minimal. I understand that by using web services, I would have to write an additional WS client layer on top of the existing java code.
Also, the usual enterprise needs, performance, scalability, etc.

Ok so you're building a web client frontend to your java backend, there are a few ways to go about this:
You want to use java standards as much as possible, preferably living in the java EE world: JSF. You will need some knowledge of HTML, XML and perhaps even javascript (though limited). Personally I have had a pretty buggy experience with JSF+richfaces to the extent that I don't use it anymore.
You are very well acquainted with java desktop application development but don't know much about javascript: vaadin: it allows you to write plain java using desktop application terminology which will be compiled to javascript. Currently I am working on a big vaadin project and it is very nice to be working with pure java in eclipse, the downside is however that you are far removed from the actual frontend, so tweaking can be tricky. Additionally everything is stored in sessions (afaik) and scales poorly.
You are primarily a frontend person with unrivaled javascript skills: use a REST interface in java and a pure js/html/css frontend. Personally I think this is the cleanest design and I have designed a few of my own applications like this. The downside is that managing large javascript projects tends to be hard because...well...javascript sucks. The upside is that this will always be the fastest most lightweight option available to you.
Ideologically I would definitely suggest the last approach but this can be hard for large projects. If you have the hardware to throw at it, vaadin is a nice option. My JSF 2 experience was a bit disappointing due to the bugs in (necessary) third party libraries like richfaces.
PS: I have never heard of DWR but the last stable release seems 2 years old and all it seems to do is expose java code as javascript methods which can be better handled with a REST interface.

Open interface standards like REST and SOAP make it easy to build code to consume these services if you are using frameworks to build a REST Client and a SOAP client code respectively. But the point is that you need to have this client code to make calls to these services.
DWR on the other hand, generates this client code. Your java classes are ready to be called (like you would do in Java).

Can i create Web App to be used on smart-phones without internet ? How?

I want to make cross - platform app which could be used for different smart-phones, and been advised to make 'Web App'.
Can 'web app' work without internet?
How to do it, which programing language to use?
thanks

Oh sure. Bundle all your HTML, JS anc CSS with your app, and have a thin Java/Android app over these assets. If you are not making any calls to fetch or show external HTML/pages, you don't need internet.

Most likely no.
While it is possible to run "web apps" without access to the internet (you can simply execute Javascript locally from some browsers), it would be
(Subjectively) not particularly useful.
Not supported by many devices, whom (like the iPhone) do not allow the storage and execution of arbitrary, non-native code on the device.
However, some frameworks do exist that hold the idea of "web apps" can be a distribution model. For example, PhoneGap allows you to code in HTML5/Javascript, and distribute your app to multiple platforms.

Yes, it can work offline once downloaded from web. Use just any regular programming language for web application development. If you are good at programming, I recommend ruby-on-rails or ASP.NET MVC with Jquery mobile.

You might want to look into frameworks like:
PhoneGap: http://www.phonegap.com/
jQuery Mobile: http://jquerymobile.com/
GWT Mobile: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-mobile-webkit/
Your question is very broad so it's hard to give a useful answer. Essentially when making a web app you'll normally be working with javascript, css, and html... though there are frameworks which will let you write your app in Java/Python/Ruby and then have those languages create your app for you. Keep in mind this is mostly all front facing stuff though. The actual web app will still need to have a backend written in a programming language that you understand (hopefully).
Good luck :).

Check out the jQuery Mobile API - I started using it recently and it has proved to be a viable option. Check this out.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Using_Application_Cache with an application cache your Web App can be used offline. It will cache the resources you specify to disk.
So you can write a Javascript + HTML webpage/app and use it both on and off line.
You can cache/store:
HTML
CSS
Javascript
Images
GET Requests

What are my options for building a rich web application?

I'm working on a client-side Java application for which I want to create a web-based user interface (which will be served up to a browser from the local app). At the risk of oversimplifying, its a microblogging tool that will support functionality similar to Twitter and Facebook. Its open source, and you can read more on our wiki.
Its important that this app is extremely easy to use, and I also want it to look good relative to contemporary web applications (such as the examples available on the Chrome web store). Since I am not a web designer, I'm hoping to use tools that give me an attractive UI "out of the box". Oh, and I need to keep the distributable file reasonably small (un him so whatever I use needs to be reasonably lightweight.
So far, I've looked at Sproutcore and GWT.
Sproutcore apps definite have the appearance I'm hoping for, but I'm not that familiar with JavaScript, and after some experimentation is not entirely clear to me how I will achieve some of the more sophisticated functionality that I think I'm going to need.
Being Java, GWT is more within my comfort zone, however I had a hell of a time just getting my development environment set up properly. It seems that GWT wants to dictate the structure of my application, but since the user interface is only a small part of it I'm not willing to build the entire app around GWT.
Something else I've been thinking about is using CoffeeScript (which seems more palatable him and him him him him him than JavaScript, and there are Maven builders for it), perhaps together with JQuery-UI.
What other options should I consider?

To recommend two big javascript frameworks Sencha and Cappuccino.
These have an extensive UI toolkit out of the box. The latter has an MVC framework build in, the former has a general JavaScript library build in. Both come highly recommended.
Also as recommended jQuery UI is a reasonable toolkit. I would personally couple Sencha for its rich UI toolkit and a lightweight MVC framework like Backbone. I'm afraid this does require learning JavaScript well.
You can also instead drive your JavaScript UI toolkit mainly from the server and skip the clientside MVC. For that sencha should surfice as a UI toolkit, but if you want meaningful functionality you will need some more structure. I would also recommend RequireJS for modular file management.

Take a look on Vaadin its based on GWT but simpler to use. I use it since 2 years and i'am not a designer too.

Take a look at jQuery & jQuery UI (jQuery Modile if you are looking to deploy to hand held devices)
Also, since you mentioned that you are not a designer, you might want to implement the front end in an MVVM pattern to separate the UI from the business logic of your applications. Knockout is a nice way to do with with decelerative data binding

I don't like writing plain JavaScript, so I'll tell you little bit about Java based frameworks. Recently, I've picked Google Web Toolkit.
Pros:
plenty of materials
Eclipse + Google plugin
Very intuitive API
3rd party libraries
Fancy widgets + optimized JavaScript
lot of generics
very active community
awesome async callbacks
Cons:
very slow debugging, that will drive you mad sooner or later
lot of deprecated code for so young framework
Mixed feelings:
You don't have to write declarative UI (you can do Swing-like development), but your code grows bigger and less maintainable, so it is quite probable that you'll eventually learn some declarative UI like UI Binder
Visual designer for GWT is somehow nice, but very unstable (eclipse) :(
Some considerations:
Do some prototyping with Vaadin. Try some debugging. Then try GWT and debugging on similar sized project. Consider debugging as the VERY important decision factor, because GWT debugging was the most frustrating thing for me.
Consider JSF + some nice rich component framework for JSF like RichFaces, IceFaces, PrimeFaces etc (but you app won't be "light" and "small" anymore if you really care). Be sure to be perfectly comfortable with environment (IDE + plugins), nothing beats JSF there (I'd pick RichFaces + Seam today, if full Java EE is option).

If you don't want to learn javascript I recommend you GWT with Sencha-GWT (GXT), you can develop all your app in java language, and also debug your code in java.
It is very easy to create a web app with this technology, and provides almost all funcionality available in javascript version.
Also you can mix it with hibernate and giled to persist your data, and giled helps you to serialize hibernate objects.

I have been writing an application in SproutCore for the front-end and a Java backend. In my mind this works perfectly.
The backend can stop worrying about HTML and JavaScript contents on the client side, if the request is XHR or plain request/response. I can implement the backends using plain old Java Servlets, and only worry about the data that is passed between the client and the server (JSON for the most part).
The client becomed fast and responsive, and SproutCore has a rich amount of components that you can mix and match.
So in other words with SproutCore (and Cappuccino and other full-blows MVC JavaScript frameworks) you can let your client do what it does best : Render and display HTML, CSS and JavaScript, while leaving your server to worry about what it does best: retrieve, store and update data. If you are interested, the source code for this project is available with the GPLv3 licence: https://github.com/joachimhs/EurekaJ
I have written an article about the differnt approaches between server-side MVC and client-side MVC here: http://haagen.name/2011/05/24/The_RIA_MVC_Model.html.
Also SproutCore comes with the MIT licence, so its avaiable for use without (m)any restrictions.

Best server-side framework for heavy AJAX Java application

There are zillions of Java web application frameworks.
95% were designed before the modern era of AJAX/DHTML-based development, and that means these new methods are grafted on rather than designed in.
Has any framework been built from the ground up with e.g. GWT + Extjs in mind?
If not, which framework has adapted best to the world of forms with dynamic numbers of fields and pages that morph client-side?

Echo2 / Echo3 by Nextapp (www.nextapp.com) is totally awesome.
Advantages over GWT:
1) It is not limited to a sub-set of java like GWT
2) It is easier (in my estimation) to learn
3) Has extremely robust design studio for almost drag and drop designing.
4) It is very fast, and works very well on all platforms browsers
5) You can write your application using either java script or java
6) It has great and straight forward methods for handling events and actions.
Personally I think that for any web-application in which you are trying to integrate java and speedy delivery I wouldn't hesitate to pick Echo3 or Echo2.

If you're starting from scratch. I'd have to say Google Web Toolkit. I have to say it is incredibly powerful. You get keep using most of your Java tools. Plus, you don't have to duplicate code that exists on both the server and the client, it just gets compiled differently for each area.

I'd consider REST-style frameworks as well as the other recommendations here- Restlet or Jersey may be good choices for the backend, while you use something like JQuery or GWT on the front end. Both frameworks can easily produce JSON, and the REST style provides a nice clean line of demarcation between your client application and your server source; I find that JSF can make that demarcation pretty muddy.

I use JSF and IceFaces. Although JSF has a few limitations, IceFaces seems to work pretty well and has ironed out a few of the problems with JSF.
I haven't used a really good AJAX Java framework as yet, although Echo2 looks interesting.

I like the stripes framework. It lets you use whatever javascript toolkit you want.
Here is their documentation on AJAX

GWT is quite powerful and easy to use (all Java, no Javascript/HTML/CSS coding). If Google has their way it will be a dominant framework/tool in web applications development, and for good reason. It already works with Google Gears (which allows offline access to web apps) - and more than likely will be optimized to work within Google Chrome.

DWR
I use this to dynamically populate drop downs, and even filter them on the fly based on user input in other places on the form.

I like the combination of JBoss Seam and Richfaces, especially with the JBoss tools that are extentions to Eclipse - makes building these sort of RIA's incredibly easy.
Wikipedia contains some useful comparisons:
Comparison of JavaScript frameworks
List of AJAX Frameworks
Your choice depends on several different factors including whether you want the "work" done client-side (most javascript frameworks) or server-side (echo2 etc.). Other things worth looking at are tools like OpenLaszlo that provide Flash (I think) out of the box, but drop back to DHTML if there is no Flash player present.
Unfortunately I think the decision comes down to balancing several competing cocerns. Check out the comparisons and try them out - most come with online demo's for you to try.

Aptana has a server side frame work called Jaxer. This is from their site:
Jaxer's core engine is based on the same Mozilla engine that you'll find in the popular Mozilla Firefox browser. This means that the execution environment you use on both the client and the server are the same. It's Ajax all the way through and through. That means you only need one set of languages -- the languages that are native to the browser -- to create entire applications.
This framework is open source and has a very nice IDE based on Eclipse. Aptana is also working on a Javascript implementation for ActiveRecord called ActiveRecordJS. Potentially you could use this both client and server side with their framework.

GWT is one of the best AJAX framework that I used ever. Most important thing about this framework is that its maintained by Google. And Everyone know "Who is Google ?"
GWT is used by many products at Google, including Google AdWords and Google
Wallet. It's open source, completely free, and used by thousands of
enthusiastic developers around the world.
GWT provide rich widgets that can be used to built any application. Almost all the widgets they have.
Another important point is GWT is continuously developing and its also have stable release which is very good thing. Another thing Google has also released GWT-Material which is again a very good thing because everyone is moving toward material.
I hope this will help you!!!