In an android application, what is the best method to store primitive data variables (such as a list of 3 integers) on the device so that those integers can be seen and manipulated by the app, but remain on the device after updating the app?
also, it would be best if there was a way to tell the difference between the user updating and uninstalling and delete the file upon the latter. Any easy way to do this that i'm unaware of?
Any example code of the actual serializing of a piece of data would be very helpful.
I'm reading the documentation, but having trouble finding really clear examples.
Refer here!
Related
I have read many blogs about how singleton are vulnerable in android.so my question is how to maintain such global objects or list in application.i know shared preference is one way but is there any way to maintain such objects or list efficiently.any help will be more helpful.
You can use a file or SQLite database to save data in android app. You can check below links to learn more about saving data in a file or SQLite database:
Saving data to a file is ideal to store long sequences of data that are generally read in order
https://developer.android.com/training/basics/data-storage/files.html
Saving data to a database is ideal for repeating or structured data:
https://developer.android.com/training/basics/data-storage/databases.html
use sharedPreferences, Sqlite database to manage your objects, singletons are not very good, but static variables are more hard to maintain and will make testing the cide more tough, you can use Shared preferences to maintain a global state if the data is not very large, if there is large amount of data then use of sqlite is recommended.
Shared preferences are extremely easy to use, if you have problem using sqlite though you can use orm libraries for android
here's a link to one: http://greenrobot.org/greendao/
If you just want to keep a list as Global until your app is running, then create a new class let's say "Helper" and Initialize a Static List in that class. Now you can access that list anywhere within the app by "Helper.yourStaticListName" and you can also add/remove or get data from the list anywhere within the app.
But if you want to keep that list even when app has been closed, then there are two solutions for that.
First Create a local database "SQLite file" in your app and add/remove or get data from it.
Check this tutorial: http://www.androidhive.info/2011/11/android-sqlite-database-tutorial/
Second solution is to convert your data into a JSON and convert that JSON into String and save it in Shared Preferences. And whenever you need it just get the string from Shared Preferences and convert it into JSON and parse to get the data.
One last thing when you are talking about parsing a JSON, then "GSON library" is a good thing to work with.
Here is the link: http://guides.codepath.com/android/leveraging-the-gson-library
Hope this answer will help you.
How about using Android Service?
You can initialize / start it when your application started (and also stop them when your application stopped) and then bind them whenever you need (put and get your object / list).
I believe it will be an efficient way.
From conceptual point having a static variables or service-locators is very similar to having Singletons. Hence, having them as alternatives may not be be correct, if the intention is to avoid the Global state and consequences.
We can change Singleton-classes into instances, which are instantiated only once and injected into the components and methods as needed. We can use a IoC-framework to handle the injection part or do it manually with a factory pattern to construct (we can restrict only one instance creation as well) instances of the classes. This discussion thread gives lot of insights on the problem and various options.
So if I understand your question right, you need to store some global variables all over your application if that's so please take a look at this question
basically you create a class that extends application which would store anything you would like on start of your app and all of them can be accessed trough out the app.
hope this helps.
If you are trying to create a globally accessible object, the first thing you should ask yourself is: Why? Why do you need a globally accessible object? Most of the time you don't, and you can get away with creating an object with a limited scope which is passed around the app.
There are times when you do want globally accessible resources and using a singleton is just one way to accomplish that. According to the Android Docs your data storage options are:
Shared Preferences
Store private primitive data in key-value pairs.
Internal Storage
Store private data on the device memory.
External Storage
Store public data on the shared external storage.
SQLite Databases
Store structured data in a private database.
Network Connection
Store data on the web with your own network server.
Singletons are great, but the do have their own risks based on how they are implemented. Typically developers use this pattern when you are attempting to share a resource within the application, things like Loggers, Print spoolers, etc. There are multiple ways that you can create Singletons in Java, you can use a Lazy Initialization or Static initialization, each has their own pro/cons. In terms of "vulnerabilities", there are issues with whether or not the singleton is thread-safe, who/what can access it, and so on. This is why it makes sense to try and understand the problem you are trying to solve. Personally, I'm not clear on what exactly you are trying to solve, so I can't really elaborate on how this might help or hurt you. All I can say is that the biggest vulnerability is also it's greatest asset, which is that like most global variables, it can be accessed from anywhere at anytime. There can also be an issue whether or not the singleton is thread-safe.
Personally, I think you need to assess what it is you are trying to solve and the pick the appropriate solution. Maybe using a singleton is the correct solution, maybe it isn't. But understanding all your options and the strength/weakness of each one is going to be the best way to solve this issue. Unfortunately, you haven't provided enough context to your problem for me, or anyone for that matter, to give you a solid recommendation.
The best way to manage global objects is not having them at all. Based on my experience, in a lot of cases there are alternative options instead using singletons. There is so good explained in this post
shared preference is good but some time you will feel problem when do some modification make static constant variable in one pojo java class and use this variable anywhere.because shared preference will not change value after use or unless you dint modify .shared preference retrieving and storing is not very unfriendly. if you use constant you can modify easily .only one class you have to hit
I am currently making a flash card program, and I want the user to be able to put in their own questions and answers, then test themselves. My only problem is that i want the values they enter to be there permanently until changed by them. How do I do this? (P.S: if you need the code, I can give it.)
I assume that you are new to programming and you have not yet worked with persistence of any context. In this case, for your simple example, the Java Properties class might be a good entry point into the field of file persistence.
In general, there are plenty of ways to persist data: databases, files, web storage, etc... It depends on your application and what you want to do with the data. For an example of the Java Properties file see for example this tutorial: http://www.mkyong.com/java/java-properties-file-examples/
Well without seeing any of the code, it is hard to tell you exactly how you should approach this, but in general you will need some method of persistence to save this type of information, ie. a database, flat file, etc. Try looking into sqlite or even XML for storage and retrieval.
When I first started using the Java Preferences API, the one glaring omission from the API was a putObject() method. I've always wondered why they did not include it.
So, I did some googling and I found this article from IBM which shows you how to do it: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-prefapi/
The method they're using seems a bit hackish to me, because you have to break the Object up into byte matrices, store them, and reassemble them later.
My question is, has anyone tried this approach? Can you testify that it is a good way to store/retrieve objects?.
I'm also curious why the Java devs left putObject() out of the API. Does anyone have valuable insight?
I'm also curious why the Java devs left putObject() out of the API.
Does anyone have valuable insight?
From: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/preferences/designfaq.html
Why doesn't this API contain methods to read and write arbitrary
serializable objects?
Serialized objects are somewhat fragile: if the version of the program
that reads such a property differs from the version that wrote it, the
object may not deserialize properly (or at all). It is not impossible
to store serialized objects using this API, but we do not encourage
it, and have not provided a convenience method.
The article describes a reliable way to do it. I see there are a couple of things I may do differently (like I would store the count of the number of pieces as well as the pieces themselves so that I can figure things out easily when I retrieve them).
Your comment about Serialization is wrong though.... the object you want to store has to be Serializable.... that's how the ObjectOutputStream that the document uses does it's job.
So, Yes, it looks like a reliable mechanism, you need to have Serializable objects, and I imagine that the reason that putObject and getObject are not part of the API for two reasons:
it's not part of the way that is native to Windows registries
It risks people putting huge amounts of data in the registry.
Storing serialized objects in the registry strikes me as being somewhat concerning because they can be so big. I would only use it for occasions when there is no way to reconstruct the Object from constructors, and the serialized version is relatively small.
I have written a math game in Java, and have distributed some copies to a few beta-testers. The problem is that the version I have given them is saving the GameData via object serialization, which I found out is mainly for sending Objects, or in this case, ArrayLists of GameData, over a network. It is NOT persistance; that is what a relational database is for. Knowing this, I would like to know if it would be better to create a database on the beta-tester's machine (and rewrite the game), or continue with the Object serialization version of the game, and then retrieve the Objects when they are ready to send the data?
My guess would be to just move their data to a database that is created on their computer, and then give them the database version of the game. That way, the data can be persisted and be much easier to manipulate. What turns me away from that idea is the question of how am I going to write their database into mine (in the future)?
Although relatively rare, there are still lots of applications that use serialization for storage and retrieval of objects. It's not wrong to do this, just slightly unusual. If it's working for you, stick with it because DB's are a heavyweight solution. What you found out, about serialization, is only an opinion and an ill-formed one at that.
In terms of using an embedded database, two options to consider are SQLite and HyperSQL. However, serialization is also an option, and in my opinion it should be your default option if you've already implemented it. Some considerations:
With serialization you've generally got to retrieve the entire object, which is slow if you've got an object with several dozen fields and you only want to read one of them. If you're making queries like these, then use a database. I suspect that you're just reading in all of your serialized objects at startup and serializing them back out to disk at shutdown, in which case there's no reason to use a database instead of serialization.
Java's default serialization mechanism is fairly slow. You may want to consider another serialization mechanism, such as Kryo or Jackson, but only if you're not happy with your program's serialization performance.
It is difficult to advise on the best choice of technology without knowing what you are persisting and why.
If the state is simply a snapshot of your game state (i.e. a save file) or a "best scores" table, then you don't need a database. Serializing using JSON, XML or ... Java Object serialization is sufficient.
If the state needs to be read or updated incrementally or shared with other applications ... or users on other machines ... then a database is more appropriate.
Serialization mechanisms are problematic if the requirements include incremental changes, etcetera. You end up building a database-like layer over the top of the serialization.
As to whether you should stick with Java serialization ... or switch to JSON or XML or something like that:
Object serialization is simple, but it can be fragile if you change the classes that you are serializing. This fragility can be mitigated, but it is messy and you lose the simplicity. (You need to write custom readObject and writeObject methods that know how to read "old versions" of the serialized objects.)
JSON and XML are a bit more complicated, but still relatively simple if you use an object binding mechanism.
It is worth noting that changes to the persisted object classes (or the database schemas) are potentially problematic no matter what you do. There is no easy universal solution to this problem.
UPDATE
Given the additional information that you provided in your first comment (below), it seems like you don't need a database in the game itself. All you need is something that can read and analyse the session state save files that your beta testers provide for you. Indeed, it doesn't even seem like the actual app needs to be able read the files. (But that's unclear, because you've not said what the real purpose of these files is ... or at least, not what the entire purpose is.)
It is also worth noting that you are probably saving the wrong information if your aim is to tune the sets of questions. What you really need to do is record the length of time and whether the user got the right or wrong answer and the time ... for each individual question. And you probably need to know what the actual answer given was ... so that you can spot cases where the user's answer was actually right and you "marked" it as wrong ... or vice versa.
"What turns me away from that idea is the question of how am I going to write their database into mine (in the future)?"
Exactly. If you hadn't prematurely "analysed" the data, you wouldn't have this problem.
But ignoring that, it seems like that a simple state saving mechanism is sufficient to meet your (still hypothetical / inferred) requirement of keeping a personal score board for the end user. Your "tuning" stuff would be better implemented using a custom log file. I cannot see any value in incorporating a database as part of the app itself.
I presume you are doing java serialisation, If so there is nothing wrong with it. Just be aware of its limitations - Different versions of java might not be able to retrieve the file.
Also If you change the Class, previous saved data can not be retrieved.
If you decide to change you could look at Xml, JSon, Protocol Buffers, Thrift, Avro etc as well as a DB.
Note:
Xml is builtin in to java
Java Db (Derby) is also in Java
Other serialisation schema's require a seperate library.
This is somewhat of an open question.
I'm in the process of developing a simple game for android and I've gotten to the point where I'm trying to enable thee user to save their progress and return later.
As i'm a beginner, I'm not exactly sure where to start, so I was hoping some of you might have at least some suggestions.
A little info on the setup of the game:
All animation is done in a thread through a canvas and alternation of stored bitmap frames based on a 30 ms loop.
Everything is an object, the characters, the background is simply a 2d array of objects. and each object is generally referenced and created dynamically through a hashmap.
Now how to save? I know I could brute force it, and simply save coordinates and current actions blah blah etc. etc. for each object in each map.
But is there a better way to do this? I've briefly read that in python there's a method of sterilizing objects called "pickle," and there is something similar called "kryo." Am I looking in the right direction?
You should look into Java serialization. It's not perfect, it has problems, but it's the safest, quickest way to turn a complex tree of objects into something that you can save to a file or a db, and load it back when you need.
Else, there's always the possibility to use your own specific serialization using INSERT SQL queries, etc. But be very careful, it's easy to miss parts of what you want to save / restore. One example of that would be to turn your objects tree into XML and save that XML as a file. There are very good 3rd-party libs to map objects to XML and back in Java.
Well.. That's not STERILIZATION, but SERIALIZATION.. Which is a programming technique. And serialization is also the technique you want to use.
Doesn't matter if you use a predefined method or something you write on your own, but the only thing that matters is to loop across the objects and write to the file (or saving structure) the date you need to be later reloaded.
Anyway yes, you're looking the right way.
The best way to do it is implementing a serialization interface. Each object for which the serialize() method is called must save it's data and then call the serialize() method for each child object it owns.