The question is whether it is possible to assign different packages for different namespaces for cfx to generate.
I have a wsdl generated by .Net application. Now I need to use it in java app. By default it generates several packages. Like com.microsoft.schemas_2003._10.serialization, datacontract.schemas._2004._07 .... And the package with the name of the target namespace.
If I add -p parameter and set package, than all the classes are placed in thin one package.
Is it somehow possible to change only one package and leave others as they are? Exactly I don't want this package with targetNamespace name, want to change it.
As dma_k mentioned, the standard jaxb/jaxws binding files is the standard way to do it.
You can do it with the -p flag as well though. The -p flag allows a namespace -> package mapping:
-p <[wsdl-namespace =]package-name>*
Related
I'm a seasoned Java dev who needs to port a Java app for web use and I've been considering using Typescript to do this. For the time being, I'd like to keep the traditional Java style of packages being a hierarchy of folders and a single class per "leaf" file.
I've been looking at the Typescript docs and I see things like ../path/to/module. Are all includes relative like that? Is there some kind of base directory option where I can get something akin to import com.ancient.java.MyType;?
Also, is declaring a package com.ancient.java; something to be done in Typescript?
I've looked over the docs but I'm not finding them easy to read with all the talk about internal and external namespaces and exporting, etc.
Can someone boil this down to something that'll feel like Java for me to start out with? I'm sure I'll baby step into all the complex stuff later as needed. What does this look like in code?
Organizing your typescript classes into 1-class per file and an organized folder hierarchy is perfectly acceptable and even encouraged in typescript.
If using typescript 2.0 or above your paths do not need to be relative. You can use the baseUrl: property to specify where non-relative (i.e. no . or ..) paths are rooted. For example of you had:
tsconfig.json
src/
foo/
foo.ts
bar/
bar.ts
you could set "baseUrl": "./src" and then you could import 'foo/foo' and import 'bar/bar' without using relative path navigation.
I would discourage you from trying to declare packages/namespace/internal modules and the like in typescript. These types of things are mostly relics of the past, and not something I would venture to use in a new project.
What I would recommend is to stick to file-based modules, as this is the modern recommended approach for composing your application.
A file that has import or export statements is considered a "file module". Everything defined within it is private to the file and does not pollute the global namespace. Things that should be shared need to be exported and imported from other files.
For example you could write the MyType class in a file structure like this:
src/
com/
ancient/
my-type.ts
my-type.ts Would look like:
export class MyType{
constructor(){
console.log('Hello World');
}
}
and then you could import it in other files like:
import {MyType} from 'com/ancient/my-type'
You should not need to use the keywords namespace or module. These are mostly things that will only be found in type declaration files.
Today I started learning Java.
I saw that package automatic gets included in .Java file.
I was wondering if it always need to be included?
Consider specify a common package for all the types within a same project.
In Java is common to start a project with a specific package setting. A package creates a namespace to disambiguate the types that it includes, to play nicelly with other projects that may or may not be in the same classpath. Normally, the package is bound to a URL of the project.
Think of Java packages like C++ namespaces.
A huge project/product written in Java can depend on lots and lots of projects, each described in a different package.
Organizations like Apache have lots of projects, organized under a common package pattern: org.apache.<<name_of_the_project>>.
Consider starting your project with a package named: com.user3552670; or something like your personal site, so persons that will consume your project can relate to the creator.
Yes and no.
It's used to specify the package of the class, read more here.
You could create a class without a package, but your code will look bad..
They exists to avoid conflicts, example between your code and default java package.
If packages doesn't exists, you can't create a class named ArrayList because already exists in Java.
Some IDEs force the fact that, if your .java file is in com/a/b/c folder his package should be com/a/b/c (If i don't remember wrong, IntellIJ IDEA do that)
Yes and no.
It must be there, but the IDE takes care of it (I don't use Netbeans, but I'd bet that it can do it, too). When moving files between packages, it has to be updated, but again, the IDE does it all.
When I'm using wsdl2java tool to generate java classes based on wsdl file I get two files for each class: first - pure virtual class file, second - class file with implementation, which have Impl postfix in classname.
So, for example if I specify in wsdl message with name ServerMessage, then ServerMessage.java will be virtual and ServerMessageImpl.java will consist needed thing.
How should I use resulting files in non-generated code? I just want to use classes as specified in my wsdl file, but with such generation I'm forced to write Impl postfix after each class name. Am I misunderstanding something?
Solved this issue. Command line argument -uw did the trick.
unwrap -
This will select between wrapped and unwrapped during code generation. Default is set to false. Maps to the -uw option of the command line tool.
http://axis.apache.org/axis2/java/core/tools/CodegenToolReference.html
I am using wsimport ant task to generate client codes. As known, the package names of auto-generated classes are determined according to the namespaces located in WSDL.
I want to change these package names and add prefix for package names.
For example, if namespace in wsdl is com.example, then the package "prefix.com.example" will be generated.
I tried 2 different solutions to handle this issue; but they coudnt help me.
-p prefix.com.example command used in wsimport ant task doesnt work for me, because all generated classes are included in one
package with this command.
jaxws or jaxb binding files work in the same way. If I add this tag <jaxb:package name="prefix.com.example" />, the generated classes are included in one package named prefix.com.example.
I just want to add prefix to all namespaces for package names while generating client codes.
Is there any other solution about this subject?
Thanks in advance.
i need an example in Developer defined package in java i cant find any example about it
as you know there are tow kinds of packages in java as the following definistion
Java Packages: The Java language provides the concept of a package as a way to group a number of related classes.
Types
– Standard Java Packages.
– Developer defined package.
brgd
A "developer defined package" is not some special kind of package. What is meant in the text that you quote is that a "developer defined package" is simply a package other than the packages in the standard Java API (packages named java.something, javax.something etc.).
Any package that you create yourself is a "developer defined package". See this tutorial page to learn about using and creating packages:
The Java Tutorials - Creating and Using Packages
Go through the java tutorials.
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/package/packages.html (and following).
It is strange. 99.999% of code is created in user defined packages. Package is like directory. If you have source directory and want to create package com.mycompany.myprogram just create directories com/mycompany/myprogram under your source directory and then create classes there. I believe that you are using IDE. In this case it helps you to manage your packages. For example in eclipse you can perform right click and then choose New->Package.