We Keep Coding

Add listener jDateChooser

i haved create this metod for add listeners in my dataChooser.
public final void añadirEsccuhaDataChoser() {
jDateChooser1.getDateEditor().addPropertyChangeListener((PropertyChangeEvent e) -> {
if ("date".equals(e.getPropertyName())) {
listarviajes1();
}
});
this.add(jDateChooser1);
}
but the result who i have obtened after run the project is this.
datachooser moved
but the my original desing is this.
data chooser original position
the method i haved situate into the public vReservas().
situation method
What can I do to prevent the dataChooser from moving?
this is a solution.
solution

The problem is that I created a method, instead of adding the listener in the JdateChooser's internal code.
The code to add the listener is the same, just place it in the custom code option of the jDateChooser.
the ubication of listener

JComboBox to display multiple lines of text

I'm currently writing a small tool for sending sql queries to a database and recieving the according data.
Now to my problem:
I want to allow the user to enter a new search query or select from a "latest" list, where the last few queries are saved.
For that, I planned on using an editable JComboBox, but I'm having trouble diplaying multiple lines of text in the box itself.
The reason I want to do that, is because sql queries can get quite long and since I want make the box editable and at the same time keep the frame clean.
I've found ways to display multiple lines in the dropdown menu, but nothing for the box itself.
Thank you in advance and please forgive me if I overlooked something simple ;)
Greetings
Zeus

Extended editing functionality is supplied by the ComboBoxEditor, this allows you to define the actual component which is used as the combobox's editor
Based on your requirements, you're going to need (at the very least) a JTextArea, to provide (optionally) word wrapping and multiple lines
A rough and ready example might look something like this...
public class TextAreaComboBoxEditor implements ComboBoxEditor {
private JTextArea ta = new JTextArea(4, 20);
private JScrollPane sp = new JScrollPane(ta);
public TextAreaComboBoxEditor() {
ta.setWrapStyleWord(true);
ta.setLineWrap(true);
}
#Override
public Component getEditorComponent() {
return sp;
}
#Override
public void setItem(Object anObject) {
if (anObject instanceof String) {
ta.setText((String) anObject);
} else {
ta.setText(null);
}
}
#Override
public Object getItem() {
return ta.getText();
}
#Override
public void selectAll() {
ta.selectAll();
}
#Override
public void addActionListener(ActionListener l) {
}
#Override
public void removeActionListener(ActionListener l) {
}
}
This doesn't support ActionListener, as JTextArea uses the Enter key for it's own purposes. If you wanted to, you could use the key bindings API to add your own Action that can trigger the ActionListeners, for that, you'd need to supply a List or other means for managing them so you can call them back

I'm new to java from a javascript background: how do they manage event listeners properly and not tighting classes together?

I've been trying to do some "simple thing" in java that in javascript would look like:
// Main class
var model = new Model();
this.callback = function(e){/* do something */}
model.addListener("change", callback);
Well in java what I found so far is making the Main class deriving from java.util.Observer and Model from java.util.Observable; Then when the model will dispatch the event it will call the update method on the Main class. I found really ugly and not elegant at all. I can't even think of how I could work with this;
Is there any cleaner and flexible ways, maybe some libs to help me out here, because I have not found any acceptable tutorial about how to do it like this?
thanks a lot
Well what I've managed so far, and I quite I like it a lot more than creating "empty" classes just for simple events (but still not good, at least for me):
private ArrayList __items;
public void addListener(Method method, Object object){
this.__listeners.add(new Object[] {method, object});
}
public void dispatch(){
int i = this.__listeners.size();
Method method;
Object context;
while(i>0){
i--;
method = (Method)(this.__listeners.get(i))[0];
context = (Object)(this.__listeners.get(i))[1];
try{
method.invoke(context);
}catch(java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException e){
}catch(java.lang.IllegalAccessException e){
}
}
}
Then I use like this:
Gifts gifts = prendastotty.PrendasTotty.getMain().getLoggedUserGifts();
Class[] parameterTypes = new Class[0];
try{
Method m = Home.class.getMethod("__updateTable", parameterTypes);
gifts.addListener(m, this);
}catch(NoSuchMethodException e){
}
It this leaky/anti-pattern/buggy?

I must say that I had a bit of trouble keeping up with your code because in my head some of the stuff didn't make sense (from a Java way of thinking, or at least my Java way of thinking). So I hope I understood you correctly and can help you out.
Let's first take your simple example:
var model = new Model();
this.callback = function(e){/* do something */}
model.addListener("change", callback);
In Java a good approach,for example, would be:
public interface ModelListener {
public void execute(Model context);
}
public class Model {
private List<ModelListener> listeners;
public Model() {
this.listeners = new ArrayList<ModelListener>();
}
public void addListener(ModelListener listener) {
this.listeners.add(listener);
}
public void dispatch() {
for (ModelListener listener: listeners) {
listener.execute(this);
}
}
}
With this sort of design you can now do one of two things:
Use anonymous classes
In Java the most common case is that all your classes have a name, although there are cases when you can create anonymous classes, these are basically classes that
are implemented inline. Since they are implemented inline, they're usually only
used when they're small and it's known they won't be re-usable.
Example:
Model model = new Model();
model.add(new ModelListener() {
public void execute(Model model) { /* do something here */ }
});
Notice how the new ModelListener object is created (which is an interface) and the execute implementation is provided inline. That is the anonymous class.
Interface Implementations
You can create classes that implement your interface and use them instead of anonymous classes. This approach is often use when you want your listeners to be re-usable, have names that give semantic meaning to the code and/or they're logic isn't just a few lines of code.
Example:
public class LogListener implements ModelListener {
public void execute(Model model) {
// Do my logging here
}
}
Model model = new Model();
model.addListener(new LogListener());
Side note
As a side note, I saw that the method you were trying to bind as a listener was called __updateTable are you by any chance trying to detect object's changes so you can commit them to the database? If so I strongly suggest you to look at some ORM frameworks such as Hibernate or JPA they'll keep all that hassle from you, keeping track of changes and committing them to the database.
Hope it helps, regards from a fellow portuguese StackOverflow user ;)

You will find it a bit difficult to try to directly map javascript ideology into java. Their underlying philosophies are different. Without more definite code and expectations it is difficult to give you a clearer answer. Here is a sample of code in GWT(written in java) that attaches a click handler to a button.
Hope this helps you get started.
myButton.addSelectionListener(new SelectionListener<ComponentEvent>(){
#Override
public void componentSelected(ComponentEvent ce) {
// do your processing here
}
});

In Java, a function can't exist outside of a class as it can in Javascript. So when you need to provide a function implementation at runtime, you have to wrap that function inside a class and pass an instance of the class, unfortunately.
The solution you have using reflection will work (I assume), but it is not the preferred way to do it in Java since what used to be compile-time errors will now be runtime errors.

How do I access the source of an ActionEvent when the ActionListener is located in a different class?

I can't get my head round this one. I've tried to adhere to the MVC pattern for the first time and now have difficulties accessing the source of an ActionEvent because the ActionListener is located in a different class. But let the code do the talking...
In the "view":
// ControlForms.java
...
private JPanel createSearchPanel() throws SQLException {
...
comboBoxCode = new JComboBox(); // Field comboBoxCode -> JComboBox()
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
AutoCompleteSupport<Object> support = AutoCompleteSupport.install(
comboBoxCode, GlazedLists.eventListOf(jnlCodeArray));
}
}); // Auto-Complete comboBox from GlazedLists
...
public void setComboListener(ComboListener comboListener) {
comboBoxCode.addActionListener(comboListener);
}
...
}
Then, in what I term the controller, I have two different classes:
// Controller.java
public MyController() throws SQLException {
...
addListeners();
}
...
private void addListeners(){
View view = getView();
getView().getControlForm().setComboListener(new ComboListener());
}
and
public class ComboListener implements ActionListener {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
System.out.println("ComboBox listened to! e = " + e.toString());
}
}
Now, e obviously doesn't give the name of the variable (which at the moment I wish it would), so I cannot if test for e.getSource().
My question is thus: is there either a) a way to query (via if for example) the source of e, or b) a less complicated way to get to the variable name?
Many, many thanks in advance for your insights and tips!

Why do you need the name of the variable? Why can't you do the event handling like this
public class ComboListener implements ActionListener
{
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
{
JComboBox source = (JComboBox)e.getSource();
//do processing here
}
}
I'd think that if you need to do processing according the variable name, obviously you need different listeners for different combo boxes.

Generally, there are only two situations in which you should use a listener like that: a) you're going to handle a certain event the same way for a bunch of objects, or b) you're only going to use the listener for one object. In the latter case, I'd prefer handling the event locally anyway.
That said, the direct answer to your question is: you shouldn't have to check inside your ActionListener implementation to see whether the appropriate object is the source of the event; you should simply only add the ActionListener to that one object.
One final note: without knowing the specifics of your architecture... generally, MVC will treat all event handling as part of the View (it reduces coupling) and the View will pass commands or method calls or your own events (i.e., not Swing's) to the Controller.

GWT SuggestBox: How do I force the SuggestBox to select the first item in the suggestion list?

I have a textbox and one suggestbox. I attach a value change and key up handler to the text box such that whatever the user types (or pastes) into the text box is echo-ed inside the suggestbox. I can get the suggestbox to display the suggestion list by calling showSuggestionList on each value change and key up event.
Now, how do I get the suggestbox to automatically choose the first item in the suggestion list?
One of the methods I tried is to programatically simulate key presses, i.e
suggestBox.setFocus(true);
NativeEvent enterEvent = Document.get().createKeyPressEvent(false, false, false, false, KeyCodes.KEY_ENTER);
DomEvent.fireNativeEvent(enterEvent, suggestBox);
textBox.setFocus(true);
This doesn't work at all. The enter key isn't simulated. Another possible solution is to extend SuggestionBox.SuggestionDisplay, but I'm not too sure how to that. Any pointers appreciated.
Update: I'm still working on this and trying various methods.
Here, I tried to implement my own SuggestionDisplay by subclassing DefaultSuggestionDisplay and overriding getCurrentSelection() to make accessible from my class. This doesn't work either. Null is returned.
private class CustomSuggestionDisplay extends DefaultSuggestionDisplay {
#Override
protected Suggestion getCurrentSelection() {
return super.getCurrentSelection();
}
}
suggestBox.setAutoSelectEnabled(true);
textBox.addKeyUpHandler(new KeyUpHandler() {
public void onKeyUp(KeyUpEvent event) {
suggestBox.setValue(textBox.getText(), true);
suggestBox.showSuggestionList();
if (suggestBox.isSuggestionListShowing()) {
String s = ((CustomSuggestionDisplay) suggestBox.getSuggestionDisplay()).getCurrentSelection().getDisplayString();
Window.alert(s);
}
}
});
Here, I tried to attach a value change handler to the SuggestBox, and casting the event type to SuggestOracle.Suggestion. Again, null is returned.
suggestBox.addValueChangeHandler(new ValueChangeHandler<String>() {
public void onValueChange(ValueChangeEvent<String> event) {
String s = ((SuggestOracle.Suggestion) event).getDisplayString();
Window.alert(s);
}
});

Use suggesBox.setAutoSelectEnabled(true)
Here more info about the SuggestBox of GWT:

You could try using addSelectionHandler in conjunction with setAutoSelectEnabled to receive an event whenever a suggestion is selected. You could also have your Oracle send a message when it suggests something, or your Display send a message when it displays a list:
public class AutomaticallySelectingSuggestionDisplay extends SuggestBox.DefaultSuggestionDisplay {
#Override
protected void showSuggestions(SuggestBox box, Collection<? extends SuggestOracle.Suggestion> suggestions, boolean isDisplayHtml, boolean isAutoSelectEnabled, SuggestBox.SuggestionCallback callback) {
super.showSuggestions(box, suggestions, isDisplayHtml, isAutoSelectEnabled, callback);
fireValueChangeEventWithFirstSuggestion(suggestions);
}
}
This idea feels a little muddled to me, so I hope you can find a solution just using event handlers.