I am trying to edit a class file and make it available to the JVM at runtime.
Is that possible, how can I do it?
For example:
main() {
for (int i=0;i<10;i++) {
NewClass.method();
//ask user if to continue..
}
}
public class NewClass() {
static void method() {
sysout("hi");
}
}
When this loop is executing, I want to change the file NewClass() and load it in the JVM, so that it prints "bye".
Here is the complete code:
try {
for (int iCount = 0; iCount < 10; iCount++) {
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(
System.in));
System.out.print("Enter which method:");
int i = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
System.out.println(i);
if (i == 1) {
Called.calledMethod1();
} else {
Called.calledMethod2();
}
}
} catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {
System.err.println("Invalid Format!");
}
I want to run the main method of one class, and while it is running I want to refer to another class, edit it, and refer the 2nd class's same method and get different output.
I don't want to:
stop the jvm
edit the code
run the code again.
I want to
edit the code at run time, and get the changes reflected immediately.
You have to use Java reflection. Using reflection,
you load dynamically a class at runtime using Class forName method.
Using invoke method on the instance of Class you got,you can call any static method you want giving it's name.
If your class is fixed at design time, you just skeep the first point. Some code:
...
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.print("Enter which class:");
JavaCompiler compiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler();
className=br.readLine()
int results = compiler.run(null, null, null, className+".java");
if(results == 0){
Class clazz = Class.forName(className+".class");
System.out.print("Compiled successfully.Enter which method:");
Object returnValue=clazz.getMethod(br.readLine()).invoke(null);
}
...
But beware of security issues: the code above let anyone to execute each static method of each class accessible at runtime. If security is one of your concern, it's better if you first validate the input received from console and test that they match one of the class methods you whant to make available via console.
EDIT:
I better understand your question after I read your comment. In order to compile a class at runtime if you are targeting Java 6, you could use Java Compiler object. I have edit the code to include JavaCompiler usage.
Related
I mean i need to pass the source code as input to a threads and let the thread compile and run the source code while it's already running ?
how could i pass a source code to map function in the mapperWordCount class , while the code of whole project is running , my program needs to take mapper and reducer code from scanner , and the code must be placed inside the map function , and reduce function, you can take a look for the code
by thread i mean not the main thread of java program .
class mapper extends Thread{
// some code
#Override
public void run() {
mapper.map(bucket,reader);
}
}
class mapperWordCount implement Mapper{
public void map ( Bucket bucket , Reader reader){
// code for word count mapper , this code must be entered by scanner as input , and compiled and run while the project is running
}
}
class reducer extends Thread{
// some code
#Override
public void run() {
Reducer.reduce(bucket,reader);
}
}
class reducerWordCount implement Reducer {
public void reduce ( Bucket bucket , MapOfKeysAndLists keyListOfKeysAndValues){
// code for reducer , this code must be entered by scanner as input , and compiled and run while the project is running
}
}
A big warning first: you must be sure of where the code you want to compile comes from, as that creates a huge potential for, well, code injection.
Another warning: if you compile classes, you can't reuse the same class name over and over so your ClassLoader will eventually eat up all of your RAM before OOME! That reason alone should make you find another way of doing that! Edit: since Java 8, there is no more PermGen space (where class metadata were stored) but a Metaspace. One of the difference being Metaspace is garbage-collected, when PermGen wasn't; so it should reduce the potential for OOME.
If you're just looking for a way to add a more dynamic configuration to your program, I would strongly suggest you look at ScriptEngine, which supports ECMAScript (very close to JavaScript) out-of-the-box (if you use Oracle's HotSpot JVM at least). It will save you the overhead of writing your own ClassLoader and compiling code.
That said, if you still want to continue in that direction, I'm just guessing here to give to a headstart, but you'll probably have to compile a file through a JavaCompiler object and inject the content of the compilation result into a ClassLoader.
If I had a computer to test, I would try something like:
Files[] files = ... ; // input for first compilation task
JavaCompiler compiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler();
StandardJavaFileManager fileManager = compiler.getStandardFileManager(null, null, null);
Iterable<? extends JavaFileObject> compilationUnits = fileManager.getJavaFileObjectsFromFiles(Arrays.asList(files));
compiler.getTask(null, fileManager, null, null, null, compilationUnits).call().get(); // Compile the class and wait for it to finish
Class<?> cls = null;
for (JavaFileObject compiledClass : compilationUnits) {
if (compiledClass.getKind() != Kind.CLASS)
continue;
int n;
byte[] classData;
try (InputStream is = compiledClass.openInputStream()) {
classData = new byte[1024]; // DO A PROPER FULL READ HERE!
n = is.read(classData);
} // catch Exceptions here
cls = myClassLoader.defineClass(className, classData, 0, n);
break;
}
if (cls != null) {
// Now, cls.newInstance() etc.
}
Apart from that being a complete try in the dark, you'll also have to define your own ClassLoader, as the defineClass() method is protected.
Alternatively, you could also spawn a call to javac using Runtime.exec() and reading bytecode bytes directly from the generated .class, or even maybe generate it directly into the classpath.
I have this input stream that checks if I have a certain CAD file open or not. I am doing this by using an input stream to run a tasklist command with the name I want to check. I currently have a boolean that returns true if the specific CAD file isn't open. If the CAD file is open, it returns false. However, I want it to be able to loop this until the CAD file is open because as of right now I have to keep running it in order for it to work. I also need to be able to check this boolean from a separate class. I have it in my main right now so i could test it. My code looks like this...
public class AutoCadCheck {
public static void main(String[] argv) throws Exception {
String notOpen = "INFO: No tasks are running which match the specified criteria";
StringBuilder textBuilder = new StringBuilder();
String command = "tasklist /fi \"windowtitle eq Autodesk AutoCAD 2017 - [123-4567.dwg]";
int i;
InputStream myStream = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command).getInputStream();
while ((i = myStream.read()) != -1) {
textBuilder.append((char) i);
}
String output = textBuilder.toString();
boolean logical = output.contains(notOpen);
if (logical) {
System.out.println("DWG Not Open");
} else {
System.out.print(output);
}
myStream.close();
}
}
My other class is going to have an 'if statement' that checks whether my boolean "logical" is false, and if so, print something. I have tried every possible method I could think of, but I cannot get it to function the way I want it to. Every other thing I found involving looping an inputstream didn't really apply to my situation. So hopefully someone can help me out in achieving what I want to do.
I would start by moving everything out of main and into a different class. This will make retrieving values and calling specific functions easier. Then create an object of that class in main. Once that is done, I'd create a get method for the boolean variable. Now to focus on the loop. Once the object is created in main, create a conditional loop inside of main which calls the function you need until a different condition is met. This condition might be met once the file is open. After the condition is met, it exits to another loop that relies on another conditional, such as user input.
public class AutoCadCheck {
public static void main(String[] argv) throws Exception {
AutoCadFile file = new AutoCadFile();
//loop 1
//Some conditional so the program will
//continue to run after the file has been found.
// while(){
//loop 2
//check to see if the file is open or not
//while(logical){
//}
//}
}
}
Other class
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
public class AutoCadFile {
private String notOpen;
private StringBuilder textBuilder;
private String command;
private int i;
private InputStream myStream;
private String output;
private boolean logical;
public AutoCadFile() {
notOpen = "INFO: No tasks are running which match the specified criteria";
textBuilder = new StringBuilder();
command = "tasklist /fi \"windowtitle eq Autodesk AutoCAD 2017 - [123-4567.dwg]";
output = textBuilder.toString();
logical = output.contains(notOpen);
try {
myStream = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command).getInputStream();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public void checkForFileOpen() {
try {
while ((i = myStream.read()) != -1) {
textBuilder.append((char) i);
}
if (logical) {
System.out.println("DWG Not Open");
} else {
System.out.print(output);
}
myStream.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public boolean getFileBoolean() {
return logical;
}
}
My other class is going to have an if statement that checks whether my boolean logical is false ...
Well, logical is a local variable within a method. So no code in another class is going to be able to see it.
There are two common approaches to this kind of thing:
Make the variable (i.e. logical) a field of the relevant class. (Preferably NOT a static field because that leads to other problems.)
Put your code into a method that returns the value you are assigning to logical as a result.
From a design perspective the second approach is preferable ... because it reduces coupling relative to the first. But if your application is tiny, that hardly matters.
I can see a couple of other significant problems with your code.
When you use exec(String), you are relying on the exec method to split the command string into a command name and arguments. Unfortunately, exec does not understand the (OS / shell / whatever specific) rules for quoting, etcetera in commands. So it will make a mess of your quoted string. You need to do the splitting yourself; i.e something like this:
String[] command = new String{} {
"tasklist",
"/fi",
"windowtitle eq Autodesk AutoCAD 2017 - [123-4567.dwg]"
};
Your code potentially leaks an input stream. You should use a "try with resource" to avoid that; e.g.
try (InputStream myStream = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command).getInputStream()) {
// do stuff
} // the stream is closed automatically ... always
I am trying to create a public instance method that takes no arguments and returns no values. It is required to get an input from a user to select a file, this part I have no issues with. The method needs to make use of the BufferReader and Scanner Objects. So that it can read the file selected. For each line that is read, a new object should be created and its instance variables set using the values found in the file.
That object that is created should then be added to a list. This is where I am having issues, it won't let me add the new object to the list. Below is my code:
public void readInEntrants()
{
String pathname = OUFileChooser.getFilename();
File aFile = new File(pathname);
Scanner bufferedScanner = null;
Set<Entrant> entrantSet = new HashSet<>();
try
{
String currentEntrantLine;
Scanner lineScanner;
bufferedScanner = new Scanner(new BufferedReader(new FileReader(aFile)));
while (bufferedScanner.hasNextLine())
{
currentEntrantLine = bufferedScanner.nextLine();
lineScanner = new Scanner(currentEntrantLine);
lineScanner.useDelimiter(" ");
currentEntrantLine = lineScanner.next();
entrantSet.add(new Entrant(currentEntrantLine)); // <----- Here is where I am having trouble. It won't let me add the new object to the class Entrant
}
}
catch (Exception anException)
{
System.out.println("Error: " + anException);
}
finally
{
try
{
bufferedScanner.close();
}
catch (Exception anException)
{
System.out.println("Error: " + anException);
}
}
return entrantSet;
}
I'm not sure what to do. Could anyone see what I am doing wrong?
Sorry for got to add that it is a compilation issue, it will not compile properly.
Use an IDE ,I bet you dont (otherwise it would mark compilation error immediatly with red -> you use return in void method ) and in this case you would see other errors.
(off: this would go to comment section however under 50reputation I am not allowed to do that. Stackoverflow should change this imo. )
First of all:
You marked function readInEntrants as public void so you can't use return inside.
You could either remove return entrantSet; instruction or change function definition to public Set<Entrant> readInEntrants.
Concerning problem you have:
Basing on comment you left on beatrice answer I think you have only parameterless constructor for 'Entrant' class, while you try to create it passing string as parameter.
new Entrant(currentEntrantLine)
What you need to do is define Entrant class constructor that accept String as it's argument. For example:
public Entrant(String dataToParse)
{
// here you parse data from string to entrant fields
}
On the side:
You use bufferedReader to read entire file line at once and that's ok, but then you define Scanner lineScanner to iterate through line elements and then use it only once.
This way for file... let's say:
One Two Three
Four Five Six
Your while loop would work like this:
Store "One Two Three" inside currentEntrantLine.
Create scanner that'll work on "One Two Three", and set it to use space as delimiter.
Use .next to "Finds and returns the next complete token" (see documentation) and then store value inside currentEntrantLine. This way contents of currentEntrantLine is "One". Not entire line.
In next iteration you would have scanner working on "Four Five Six" and "Four" as currentEntranceLine content.
It seems the constructor of entrant class does not have any argument. Pass String as an argument type in the constructor to set the String field inside the Entrant class .
This is a second part to my question here.
I now have a process but I want to know how to get the output from the process?
String filename = matlab.getfileName();
Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("java -cp mediaProperty.java " + filename);
My mediaProperty.java:
public class mediaProperty {
public static Object main(String[] args) {
Object[] mediaProp = null;
java.util.List lstMedia = new ArrayList();
Media media = null;
try {
media = new Media();
lstMedia.add(args);
mediaProp = media.media(3, lstMedia);
} catch (Exception p) {
System.out.println("Exception: " + p.toString());
} finally {
MWArray.disposeArray(mediaProp);
if (media != null) {
media.dispose();
}
}
return mediaProp;
}
}
The mediaProperty.java will return an Object. Inside this is actually String array. How do I get the array? And is the way I'm calling exec() correct?
use public static void main (not Object as return type)
Serialize the object using ObjectOutputStream (all necessary examples are in the javadoc)
The only thing different from the example is the construction - construct it like
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(System.out);
in the program calling exec(), get the output with process.getOutputStream()
Read in an ObjectInputStream based on the already retreived OutputStream (check this)
Deserialize the object (see the javadoc of ObjectInputStream)
Now, this is a weird way to do it, but as I don't know exactly what you are trying to achieve, it sounds reasonable.
You could do System.setOut(new PrintStream(p.getOutputStream())) if you'd like to have the process print its results directly to standard output. Of course, this will override the old standard output. But you could also do other things with the process's output stream, like have a thread that reads from it.
A problem with your code is that the main function of a class must be of type void, and will return nothing. You will not be able to pass Java objects between processes, as they are running in different JVMs. If you must do this you could serialize the object to disk, but I imagine you don't even need to run this in a separate process.
mediaProp is a local variable in your main() method. It's not accessible from the outside.
You'll have to redesign your mediaProperty class a bit.
First, you should use:
"java -cp . mediaProperty " + filename
for calling the java process. The "-cp ." defines the classpath and I have made the assumption that the java file is compiled and the generated class file is at the same path as the executing process.
Then, you need to print the result at the standard output and not just return it. Finally, read this article for reading the output.
Tip 1: Rename the class to MediaProperty
Tip 2: Why you don't call the MediaProperty class directly from your code? Is it necessary to start a new process?
There are a few gotcha's.
In exec you assume that java is on the path, and the filename should be fully qualified or you should know that the current working dir of the java process is OK.
main() should return void (nothing). If you want to pass the results out of your program use something like:
for (Object o : mediaProp) {
System.out.println(o);
}
and parse it again on the input stream (the calling software).
Better yet, include the MediaProperty class in the java path and call main(...) directly in stead of calling a separate java process.
Does Java have a using statement that can be used when opening a session in hibernate?
In C# it is something like:
using (var session = new Session())
{
}
So the object goes out of scope and closes automatically.
Java 7 introduced Automatic Resource Block Management which brings this feature to the Java platform. Prior versions of Java didn't have anything resembling using.
As an example, you can use any variable implementing java.lang.AutoCloseable in the following way:
try(ClassImplementingAutoCloseable obj = new ClassImplementingAutoCloseable())
{
...
}
Java's java.io.Closeable interface, implemented by streams, automagically extends AutoCloseable, so you can already use streams in a try block the same way you would use them in a C# using block. This is equivalent to C#'s using.
As of version 5.0, Hibernate Sessions implement AutoCloseable and can be auto-closed in ARM blocks. In previous versions of Hibernate Session did not implement AutoCloseable. So you'll need to be on Hibernate >= 5.0 in order to use this feature.
Before Java 7, there was no such feature in Java (for Java 7 and up see Asaph's answer regarding ARM).
You needed to do it manually and it was a pain:
AwesomeClass hooray = null;
try {
hooray = new AwesomeClass();
// Great code
} finally {
if (hooray!=null) {
hooray.close();
}
}
And that's just the code when neither // Great code nor hooray.close() can throw any exceptions.
If you really only want to limit the scope of a variable, then a simple code block does the job:
{
AwesomeClass hooray = new AwesomeClass();
// Great code
}
But that's probably not what you meant.
Since Java 7 it does: http://blogs.oracle.com/darcy/entry/project_coin_updated_arm_spec
The syntax for the code in the question would be:
try (Session session = new Session())
{
// do stuff
}
Note that Session needs to implement AutoClosable or one of its (many) sub-interfaces.
Technically:
DisposableObject d = null;
try {
d = new DisposableObject();
}
finally {
if (d != null) {
d.Dispose();
}
}
The closest java equivalent is
AwesomeClass hooray = new AwesomeClass();
try{
// Great code
} finally {
hooray.dispose(); // or .close(), etc.
}
As of now, no.
However there is a proposal of ARM for Java 7.
If you're interested in resource management, Project Lombok offers the #Cleanup annotation. Taken directly from their site:
You can use #Cleanup to ensure a given
resource is automatically cleaned up
before the code execution path exits
your current scope. You do this by
annotating any local variable
declaration with the #Cleanup
annotation like so:
#Cleanup InputStream in = new FileInputStream("some/file");
As a
result, at the end of the scope you're
in, in.close() is called. This call is
guaranteed to run by way of a
try/finally construct. Look at the
example below to see how this works.
If the type of object you'd like to
cleanup does not have a close()
method, but some other no-argument
method, you can specify the name of
this method like so:
#Cleanup("dispose") org.eclipse.swt.widgets.CoolBar bar = new CoolBar(parent, 0);
By default, the cleanup method is presumed to be
close(). A cleanup method that takes
argument cannot be called via
#Cleanup.
Vanilla Java
import java.io.*;
public class CleanupExample {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
InputStream in = new FileInputStream(args[0]);
try {
OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(args[1]);
try {
byte[] b = new byte[10000];
while (true) {
int r = in.read(b);
if (r == -1) break;
out.write(b, 0, r);
}
} finally {
out.close();
}
} finally {
in.close();
}
}
}
With Lombok
import lombok.Cleanup;
import java.io.*;
public class CleanupExample {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
#Cleanup InputStream in = new FileInputStream(args[0]);
#Cleanup OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(args[1]);
byte[] b = new byte[10000];
while (true) {
int r = in.read(b);
if (r == -1) break;
out.write(b, 0, r);
}
}
}
No, Java has no using statement equivalent.
In java 8 you can use try. Please refer to following page. http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html
Please see this List of Java Keywords.
The using keyword is unfortunately not part of the list.
And there is also no equivalence of the C# using keyword through any other keyword as for now in Java.
To imitate such "using" behaviour, you will have to use a try...catch...finally block, where you would dispose of the resources within finally.
ARM blocks, from project coin will be in Java 7. This is feature is intended to bring similar functionality to Java as the .Net using syntax.
To answer the question regarding limiting scope of a variable, instead of talking about automatically closing/disposing variables.
In Java you can define closed, anonymous scopes using curly brackets. It's extremely simple.
{
AwesomeClass hooray = new AwesomeClass()
// Great code
}
The variable hooray is only available in this scope, and not outside it.
This can be useful if you have repeating variables which are only temporary.
For example, each with index. Just like the item variable is closed over the for loop (i.e., is only available inside it), the index variable is closed over the anonymous scope.
// first loop
{
Integer index = -1;
for (Object item : things) {index += 1;
// ... item, index
}
}
// second loop
{
Integer index = -1;
for (Object item : stuff) {index += 1;
// ... item, index
}
}
I also use this sometimes if you don't have a for loop to provide variable scope, but you want to use generic variable names.
{
User user = new User();
user.setId(0);
user.setName("Andy Green");
user.setEmail("andygreen#gmail.com");
users.add(user);
}
{
User user = new User();
user.setId(1);
user.setName("Rachel Blue");
user.setEmail("rachelblue#gmail.com");
users.add(user);
}