I have a ITestListener to note test results. In my locator class if I try to handle something in catch statement, none of the code inside the catch is executed. For ex : I am trying to handle a WebElement that may or may not throw exception. When it throws exceptions, I should handle in the catch statement and locate different element. Since catch statement is not being executed and when the exception occurs, the applications just halts. Is there a way I could run the catch statement even when onTestFailure method is ON from TestNG ? Please suggest a solution.
//Test Script
public boolean loginVerification(String username, String password) {
try {
utilities.click(helloSignInLink, "elementToBeClickable");
reportLog("debug","info","Clicked on SignIn link");
utilities.sendText(loginID, username);
reportLog("debug","info","Username entered");
utilities.sendText(passwordID, password);
reportLog("debug","info","Password entered");
utilities.click(submit, "elementToBeClickable");
reportLog("debug","info","Clicked on submit button");
Thread.sleep(2000);
isTrue = driver.getTitle().contains("Vectors");
}
catch(Exception e) {
reportLog("debug","info","Unable to login with username : "+username+" , error message : "+e);
isTrue = false;
}
return isTrue;
}
I would recommend to catch Throwable - not just an Exception. Another thing is that when you catch something the excepttion does not really go up the stack so TestNG would never know if anything went wrong in your test and test listener would not detect failure. There is the way to push the exception further on after you have cought it. Like:
catch(Throwable e) {
reportLog("debug","info","Unable to login with username : "+username+" , error message : "+e);
isTrue = false;
throw e;
}
Can you correct your approach and let us know if the issue still exists?
P.S. - I also cannot see any assertions in your code. Assert results or Exception define the test result.
That means you are not catching the same error catch block.
Either use the same exception like TimeoutException so this block will only if TimeoutException occur. If you not sure about the error use generic exception block like Exception it will for sure going to execute if any error occur. In this case Exception will not execute for TimeoutException only because you have already specify same
try {
System.out.println("Your code");
}catch(TimeoutException t) {
System.out.println(t.getMessage());
}catch(Exception ex) {
ex.getStackTrace();
}
I am coding a Spring MVC, hibernate app. I can't decide where should I throw custom exceptions, what custom exceptions to throw and where to catch "Exception", in controller or service or DAO?
I tried to throw a custom exception in controller and service and catch "Exception" in the controller as the last catch block. But every time a custom exception is thrown, the last catch block( of Exception) catches it and throws CustomGenericException overriding the previous one.
//Controller
#PostMapping("/add/{user_id}/{book_id}")
public #ResponseBody
String addToCart(#PathVariable("user_id") Integer user_id,
#PathVariable("book_id") Integer book_id){
try {
return cartService.addBook(user_id, book_id);
}
catch (HibernateException | CannotCreateTransactionException dbException) {
throw new DatabaseDownException("Database error. Could not connect at this time.");
}
catch (Exception ex){
throw new CustomGenericException("Could not add book to cart at this time. Please try again later.");
}
}
//Service
#Override
public String addBook(int user_id, int book_id) {
if(bookDAO.getCount(book_id)>0) {
Cart cart = new Cart(user_id, book_id);
List<Cart> userCarts = cartDAO.getCart(user_id, 0);
for (Cart c : userCarts) {
if (c.getBook_id() == book_id) {
return "Book already in cart!";
}
}
List<Cart> issuedBooks =cartDAO.getCart(user_id, 1);
for(Cart c:issuedBooks){
if(c.getBook_id()==book_id){
return "Book already issued. Can't add another to cart.";
}
}
return cartDAO.addBookToCart(cart);
}
return "No more copies left. Please try again later.";
}
I want to know where should I throw exceptions, where to catch them and how to avoid custom thrown exceptions getting caught by last catch block.
#aks If you want to throw checked exceptions than you should pass "cause" exception to constructor of exception on higher level (in this case the last one catch) because otherwide the cause information is lost. Core Exception class has constructor with cause parameter to pass.
You can also try to use Controller Advice https://spring.io/blog/2013/11/01/exception-handling-in-spring-mvc
I hope I helped a little bit :)
read about chained exception in Java here
you are not wrapping exception object in your custom exception , that is why you feel like previous exception is getting overridden .
My problem is that JPA/Hibernate returns true for a call of entityManager.getTransaction().isActive() even when I did not explicitly start a transaction (see code below).
The problem here is that I want to read something from the database and a SerializationException is ok in this scenario, because this just indicates that the persisted object does not fit to the actual code any more and needs to be recalculated. Instead of just returning null the code below throws the following exception:
Transaction rollback failed.
org.hibernate.TransactionException: Unable to rollback against JDBC Connection
This shows me, there must have been a transaction somewhere which I did not start in my code. The finally block in the code above is
final EntityManager entityManager = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("test").createEntityManager();
try {
final TypedQuery<Test> query = entityManager.createQuery("SELECT t FROM test t", Test.class);
return query.getResultList();
} catch (final PersistenceException e) {
if (e.getCause() instanceof SerializationException) {
LOG.debug("Implementation changed meanwhile. That's ok - we return null.");
return null;
}
throw e;
} finally {
EntityManagerCloser.closeEntityManager(entityManager);
}
And the EntityManagerCloser looks like this:
public final class EntityManagerCloser {
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(EntityManagerCloser.class);
public static void closeEntityManager(EntityManager entityManager) {
if (entityManager.getTransaction().isActive()) {
try {
entityManager.getTransaction().rollback();
} catch (PersistenceException | IllegalStateException e) {
LOG.error("Transaction rollback failed.", e);
}
}
if (entityManager.isOpen()) {
try {
entityManager.close();
} catch (IllegalStateException e) {
LOG.error("Closing entity manager failed.", e);
}
}
}
}
Hibernate docs says "Always use clear transaction boundaries, even for read-only operations". So do I really need to insert a
entityManager.getTransaction().begin();
....
<do read here>
....
entityManager.getTransaction().commit();
around every read operation I perform on the database?
I could implement another closeEntityManager method for read-only operations without the rollback transaction block but I want to understand why there IS a transaction at all. Thanks for any help!
The problem is that when you call entityManager.getTransaction(); a new transaction object will be created. So it is better to save the transaction reference to a variable as shown below.
Transaction txn = entityManager.getTransaction();
if (txn.isActive()) {
try {
txn.rollback();
} catch (PersistenceException | IllegalStateException e) {
LOG.error("Transaction rollback failed.", e);
}
}
Thanks to Jobin I quickly found the solution to my problem:
I think I need to call entityManager.isJoinedToTransaction() in my closeEntityManager method before calling entityManager.getTransaction().isActive().
This will prevent the EntityManagerCloser to start its own transaction which I can not rollback later because I did not explicitly call transaction.begin() on it.
Can someone explain the difference between catching an Exception and catching an SQLException? I know that SQLException will print out more information if you choose to print out the exception errors, but is there anything else?
try {
//code
} catch(Exception ex) {
//code
}
And
try {
//code
} catch(SQLException ex) {
//code
}
What are the benefits and differences of using Exception and SQLException in the catch block?
This is not the only difference.
Catching Exception is dangerous because it also catches all RuntimeExceptions (therefore unchecked exceptions), and that include niceties such as NullPointerException etc which are clear programmer errors. Don't do that!
Also, Exception is a class like any other, so you can subclass it and add constructors/methods of yours. For instance, SQLException has a .getErrorCode() method which Exception does not have. If you only catch Exception, you cannot access this method.
In general, catching the "more precise" exception first is the best. For instance, with the new (in Java 7...) file API, you can easily distinguish between filesystem level errors and other I/O errors, since FileSystemException extends IOException:
try {
something();
} catch (FileSystemException e) {
// fs level error
} catch (IOException e) {
// I/O error
}
It's all about the hierarchy,when you are talking about the catching the exception.
Technically speaking, Exception - is the super class which catches each and every exception.
If you are writing something related to SQL in the try block and you know it may even throw SQL Exception.
Then you may declare it this way as well.
try
{
}catch(SQLException ex)
{
Do this,when SQL Exception is caught.
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
Generic Exception - works for all
}
SQLException inherits from Exception, so SQLException will contain more (and more specific) information than Exception (which is intended to apply generally to all exceptions).
You can also have multiple catch clauses; so you can first try to catch the SQLException, but if it's not a SQLException, then you can just catch the general Exception.
In general, you shouldn't catch exceptions unless you intend to handle them in some way. You can have a top-level exception handler that catches any exceptions that bubble up to the top of the call stack, so that your program doesn't crash on unhandled exceptions.
A - Explanation
SQLException is a subtype of java.lang.Exception and also it is implementing the Iterable<Throwable> class. Programmers prefer throwing different subtypes of Exception class because on some higher level, they want to catch the exact sub-Exception class so that they can be sure that that specific Exception is thrown on some exact scenario. Thus, they can know the exact source of Exception.
B - Example
Consider you have written a method that throws multiple exceptions. Let's say, you take a json String and parse it, then persist it on the database. Consider the following method;
public boolean persistCustomer(String jsonString) throws SQLException, IOException {
Connection conn = getConnection();
PreparedStatement preparedStatement = null;
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
try {
Customer customer = objectMapper.readValue(jsonString, Customer.class);
preparedStatement = conn.prepareStatement(PERSIST_CUSTOMER);
preparedStatement.setString (1, customer.getName());
preparedStatement.setInt (2, customer.getAge());
preparedStatement.setBoolean (3, customer.getIsRegular());
preparedStatement.executeUpdate();
return true;
} catch (IOException e) {
throw e;
} finally {
try {
if (preparedStatement != null)
preparedStatement.close();
if (conn != null)
conn.close();
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
In this method, we are converting JSON into a Customer class and also we persist customer class to the database.
The following lines throw SQLException;
preparedStatement = conn.prepareStatement(PERSIST_CUSTOMER);
preparedStatement.setString (1, customer.getName());
preparedStatement.setInt (2, customer.getAge());
preparedStatement.setBoolean (3, customer.getIsRegular());
preparedStatement.executeUpdate();
prepareStatement(), setters and executeUpdate() methods, all of them throwing SQLException's. But also, the line that which we convert JSON in a String into a Customer object, also throws several Exceptions other than SQLException.
Customer customer = objectMapper.readValue(jsonString, Customer.class);
readValue() method throws JsonParseException, JsonMappingException and also IOException. All of them can be catched using an IOException because the JSON related exceptions extend IOException.
I'm going to provide two different examples so that it will be obvious to understand why we need different types of Exceptions.
C - Bad Practice: Using Exception To Catch All Exceptions
public class BadPracticeExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
MySQLUtil dbUtil = new MySQLUtil();
String jsonString = "{\"name\":\"Levent\",\"age\":31,\"isRegular\":true}";
try {
dbUtil.persistCustomer(jsonString);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("A problem occured");
}
}
}
As you can see, it catches the Exception but what are we going to do if we need special exception handling for two different sources of problems? persistCustomer can throw either IOException or an SQLException and what if we need to do different set of tasks to handle those problems? I want to send an email to the database admin when an SQLException occurs and I want to continue when a JSON parsing problem occurs, on the case that an IOException is catched?
In this scenario you can't do that. Here is the output of the code snippet above and we are only sure that an Exception occured but we don't have any idea about what is the source of it;
A problem occured
D - Good Practice Example I: SQL Exception catched
public class GoodPracticeExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
MySQLUtil dbUtil = new MySQLUtil();
String jsonString = "{\"name\":\"Levent\",\"age\":31,\"isRegular\":true}";
try {
dbUtil.persistCustomer(jsonString);
} catch (SQLException e) {
System.out.println("SQL Exception catched, SQL State : " + e.getSQLState());
System.out.println("Error Code : " + e.getErrorCode());
System.out.println("Error Message : " + e.getMessage());
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Cannot parse JSON : " + jsonString);
System.out.println("Error Message : " + e.getMessage());
}
}
}
As you can see, we catch for both, JSON and SQL problem and in this example, submethod is trying to persist DB where there is no table. The output is as below;
SQL Exception catched, SQL State : 42000
Error Code : 1142
Error Message : INSERT command denied to user 'levent'#'example.com' for table 'CUSTOMER'
So we have catched SQL Exception and we have all parameters we need to send an alarm email. We can add additional handler or utility methods on the SQLException catch block.
D - Good Practice Example II: IOExceptoin catched on Parsing Error
public class GoodPracticeExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
MySQLUtil dbUtil = new MySQLUtil();
String jsonString = "{\"Zname\":\"Levent\",\"age\":31,\"isRegular\":true}";
try {
dbUtil.persistCustomer(jsonString);
} catch (SQLException e) {
System.out.println("SQL Exception catched, SQL State : " + e.getSQLState());
System.out.println("Error Code : " + e.getErrorCode());
System.out.println("Error Message : " + e.getMessage());
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Cannot parse JSON : " + jsonString);
System.out.println("Error Message : " + e.getMessage());
}
}
}
If you've noticed, I"ve corrupted the JSON to cause an IOException. Now in the json string, instead of "name", "Zname" is written which will cause Jackson Parser to fail. Let's checkout the output of this code.
Cannot parse JSON : {"Zname":"Levent","age":31,"isRegular":true}
Error Message : Unrecognized field "Zname" (class com.divilioglu.db.utils$Customer), not marked as ignorable (3 known properties: "isRegular", "name", "age"])
at [Source: (String)"{"Zname":"Levent","age":31,"isRegular":true}"; line: 1, column: 11] (through reference chain: com.divilioglu.db.utils.MySQLUtil$Customer["Zname"])
As you can see, we catched the specific scenario and we are sure, this comes from the line in dbUtil.persistCustomer() method which can be seen below;
Customer customer = objectMapper.readValue(jsonString, Customer.class);
E - Conclusion
So as it is a best practice to create new Exceptions by extending existing Exception classes. While writing your code at first, you may think that it is an overkill and you won't need additional Exception classes, but you will need them when you need distinguish the source of the problem and handle them independently.
In this example demonstrated above, I can independently catch IOException and SQLException and the sources of both Exceptions are coming from the same method. I want to distinguish both so that I can handle them independently. You cannot have that flexibility if you just wrap all the Exceptions with the base Exception class.
Exception is a standard class from which every exceptions inherit.
SQLException is a class that inherits from Exception and that is designed specifically for database(SQL) exceptions.
By doing
try {
// Your code here
} catch (Exception e) {
// Catching here
}
You are catching every type of exception possible... But then, you might not be able to know how to react to a specific exception.
but by doing
try {
// Your code here
} catch (SQLException e) {
// Catching here
}
You know that the exception happened while working on a database and it helps you know how to react to the exception.
As you see SQLException extends exception. So that's the only difference really. When you are catching exception then you will catch ALL exceptions (which is bad). But when you are catching SQLException then you catch only that(which is good because that is what you are seeking).
If an exception in between the try and catch blocks is thrown that is not a SQL Exception (these will typically only come from database-related code), for example a Null Pointer Exception, the Exception catch will catch it but the SQLException will not.
SQLException is an Exception so you are just getting a more specific exception.
According to Oracle's javadocs, this specific information you get is:
a string describing the error. This is used as the Java Exception
message, available via the method getMessage.
a "SQLstate" string, which follows either the XOPEN SQLstate
conventions or the SQL:2003 conventions. The values of the SQLState
string are described in the appropriate spec. The DatabaseMetaData
method getSQLStateType can be used to discover whether the driver
returns the XOPEN type or the SQL:2003 type.
an integer error code that is specific to each vendor. Normally this
will be the actual error code returned by the underlying database.
a chain to a next Exception. This can be used to provide additional
error information.
the causal relationship, if any for this SQLException.
SQLException is a specialized exception derived from Exception.
If you catch Exception, all exception shall get caught. Even undesirable exceptions.
If you catch only its specialiazation, the SQLException, only the SQLException itself or its derived shall get caught.
One shall catch only exceptions one can handle or wishes to handle, and let the others bubble up.
For further reference, please take a look at the following:
Exception
SQLException
SQL exception is a frequent error while working in Java Database Connectivity (JDBC).Its related to accessing or setting column in your SQL Query using prepared statement.
SQLException is a derived from Exception and contains more specific information related to accessing or setting column in your SQL query, while exception is usually more general.
I am using a Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer to consume messages from a queue. The messages are then saved to an Oracle database.
When the database goes down, I throw an exception out of the onMessage method and that leaves the message on the queue to be reprocessed. Below you can see that on a DataAccessResourceFailureException and CannotCreateTransactionException exception, I throw the exception out of the method, which puts it back on the queue. The other exceptions do not save the message; they correspond to data problems and such.
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message mqMessage) {
...get the message blah, blah, blah
try {
this.theService.doMessage(tmaticMessage, theHandler);
} catch (DataAccessResourceFailureException e) {
this.slowDown(mqMessage);
throw e;
} catch (CannotCreateTransactionException e) {
this.slowDown(mqMessage);
throw e;
} catch (DataAccessException e) {
...
} catch (TmUnusableMessageException e) {
...
} catch (Exception e) {
...
}
}
Reading the Spring docs, I discovered that DataAccessResourceFailureException should be thrown "... when a resource fails completely: for example, if we can't connect to a database using JDBC." The problem is that I just did a test where I had the DBA take the database down and got a new exception: CannotCreateTransactionException. So that is one more exception that can be thrown. I am wondering if there are others.
I am using Spring Connections and getHibernateTemplate() to make my calls. Here is the question. How do I know what exceptions can be thrown when a database goes down?
Maybe the complexity is caused by various way you can 'take a database down'. For example:
deleting a table
deleting entire database
disabling a db user account
shutting down the database server
All can be considered as 'taking a database down', but each could cause a different exception being thrown
If you browse through following sections in spring javadoc, there are lists of exceptions that could be thrown:
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/api/org/springframework/dao/package-frame.html
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/api/org/springframework/transaction/package-frame.html