We Keep Coding

What is the purpose of web server in a local web application?

I am sure this sounds silly, but for a beginner like me, this is cooking my brain up and I am not able to proceed in my quest without clearing this.
Lets say I am building a simple java command line calculator application that takes 2 numbers and an operator as input and returns the operation's result back to the user. Now, I want to build GUI on top of it (similar to like an online calculator). For this, I decided to build a web application so that I can open the application on my browser and use it seamlessly. It leads to the following questions in my head
Will I have to build a web server in java to allow communications between the front end/GUI and the back end? There is no communication with any other networks, its strictly local; yet I am having to create a web server to make this work and that is confusing me. Or do I need one because I decided to build a web application meant to be opened in a web browser? Or is the reason something else entirely?
If I instead decided to build a windows/android/mac/ios application, would I still to bake a web server for communicating? Or can I use something like swings (I know its really primitive) to do this which essentially would allow the GUI to directly communicate with the business logic?
I know front-end languages like javascript allow me to code the entirety of the calculator in itself, and as a result eliminate the need of a web server. However, what if I was building relatively complex application with a backend database, like spotify? (within the same constraint that the application doesn't need to communicate with other applications and all data is stored locally) Would this solution still work?
In brief, I am failing to understand the purpose of building an entire client-server infrastructure even though the entire thing is local and offline(if that makes sense?). Or is my very basic understanding of client-server flawed?

If you want to use a web browser as the tool to interface with your Java app, then you need a web server. The browser is simply an app that tries to make a network connection with another app, and passes some text as defined by the HTTP protocol.
You would have a choice of three scenarios for this:
Write an app that accepts network connections, processes HTTP, and sends back a response.
Write a Java app that uses the very basic web server built into Java 18 and later. Note that this web server is not intended to be a feature-rich or commercial-grade server.
Write a Jakarta Servlet class that runs on top of a Servlet container with a web server. For your needs, either Apache Tomcat or Eclipse Jetty would work well as both the Servlet container and the web server.
For your scenario, the middle option using Java JEP 408 seems most appropriate and easiest.
You said:
There is no communication with any other networks, its strictly local; yet I am having to create a web server to make this work and that is confusing me.
A Border Collie dog herds sheep. That is its most basic basic core mission. Those sheep can be herded across the hills of a mountain range or they can be herded locally within your own farm.
A web browser makes network connections. That is its most basic core mission. Those network connections can be made over the actual network or they can be made locally within a single computer ( a “localhost”).
You said:
Or do I need one because I decided to build a web application meant to be opened in a web browser?
Yes a web application accessed by a web browser needs a web server, by definition.
You said:
If I instead decided to build a windows/android/mac/ios application, would I still to bake a web server for communicating?
Or can I use something like swings (I know its really primitive)
There is nothing “primitive” about Swing. It is a fully-developed feature-rich GUI framework. Swing comes built in with every JDK. And Swing will be supported for many years to come.
However, the design and features of Swing may or may not suit your tastes. And Swing is now in maintenance-mode.
An alternative is JavaFX, now actively developed as the OpenJFX libraries.
To use JavaFX, you must either add the OpenJFX libraries to your project or else deploy to a JDK that comes bundled with the OpenJFX libraries (ZuluFX, LibericaFX, etc.).
to do this which essentially would allow the GUI to directly communicate with the business logic?
Yes the GUI and and your calculator business logic would all be plain Java classes, all peers, all running together within the same JVM.
You said:
I know front-end languages like javascript allow me to code the entirety of the calculator in itself, and as a result eliminate the need of a web server.
Yes. You could cook up JavaScript code to implement your little calculator. This JavaScript could be placed within the text of a file with the HTML of a web page. That web page file could be opened locally by the web browser. Your HTML and JavaScript would render. No web server is needed in this scenario.
But this scenario eliminates Java, and you said you want to (a) write your calculator in Java, and () use a web browser. So we go back to the three options listed above.
You said:
However, what if I was building relatively complex application with a backend database, like spotify? (within the same constraint that the application doesn't need to communicate with other applications and all data is stored locally) Would this solution still work?
Yes you could deploy a database server on your local machine. Then you could find and use a JavaScript binding tool to talk to that database.
But then you would not be using Java and all its goodness. For that scenario I would choose to write a JavaFX app with an embedded Java-based database engine such as H2. This would result in a single all-in-one double-clickable-app solution.
But that would be my choice based on my own preferences and skill set. Other people might choose other solutions.
the purpose of building an entire client-server infrastructure even though the entire thing is local and offline
👉 The “offline” part may be distracting you.
Conventional computers with modern operating systems such as macOS, BSD, Linux, Windows, etc. are always “online” in that they all maintain a networking stack. That network stack can be used locally by processes within the one computer to communicate with each other. Whether you happen to have an Ethernet cable plugged in, or WiFi turned on, makes little difference to the computer. The networking stack in the OS is still available and active regardless of outside network access.
So client-server architecture works just as well within a single computer as it does between computers. (Actually, it’s works faster locally, as hopping on and off the network is terribly slow.)
Why choose client-server architecture for a local app? Either:
You are skilled in, and prefer, the tools for a client-server architecture.
You want to eventually move from local-only to being networked.
If neither of those two is true, then the JavaFX with H2 solution I mentioned is likely a better fit for a Java programmer.
By the way, let me put in a plug for Vaadin Flow, a GUI framework for building web apps in pure Java.

It's not completely necessary to bake web server to host your application even with embedded tomcat application you can host your application. However, main purpose of webserver usage is for setting up your reverse proxy so that your application behind that won't be exposed and your webserver will be acting as endpoint to outside requests.
In case for hosting application in local webserver is not at all required webserver will come handy when your application hosted in production environment.

External plugin framework to my JAVA application

I built a large JAVA web application using SPRING & MongoDB,
In some scenarios, I want to allow my users to upload their own code, and the application will run it later on when necessary.
I called this operation "Plugin framework", the plugin is the user's code of course which I prefer to be in NodeJS for now.
There is any recommended / known architecture for that purpose?
I've read about pf4j and senecajs, but they quite different from my needs.
Thanks!

You loose complete control over code running on node. The uploaded code can access network, files, database, you name it. That is not a good plan.
I suggest to work with the embedded JS module in Java, called rhino. Here, you define which environment the code can access.
You find samples of using the scripting in Java here http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/scripting/programmer_guide/index.html for jdk7, the Javadocs https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/script/ScriptEngine.html and here some info on Java8 changes http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/jf14-nashorn-2126515.html
UPDATE:
On the comment below, you state that you think you are safe, if the code runs on the other server. Actually, the problem is still the same. Just it won't hit your application's server but the JS code server.
My advice stands. Implement a JS execution service using the built-in Javascript engine (Rhino or Nashorn) and restrict the running JS to a sandbox, you control the script's reach out of the box through carefully implemented env-access methods. It is actually pretty easy to get started, no more complicated than implementing a remote javascript implementation engine on top of node...

GWT interaction with external standalone application

I work on a standalone Java application that is a command-and-control system for an assortment of hardware. The C&C software basically runs from a command line, and controls the system hardware which is spread out all over the place. It does not require a GUI to meet the business requirements. I have written a small swing GUI just so I can see what the overall status is of the system, but again, that is not essential.
Going forward, we would like to have a Administrative web GUI with system status and something that would give a user some level of control over the hardware. We were thinking that GWT might be a viable solution. Our GWT app would have to have some sort of IPC with the C&C software. I don't know how viable that is, I don't know that we want the C&C software bundled as a web app that has to run under application server.
I just don't have much experience with this. I was thinking that the GWT client would interact through RPC with the GWT server, and the GWT server would have some sort of RPC (RMI???) with the C&C.

Another option you have is to run a Java Applet that can interact with both GWT (using JSNI) and with the OS. A simple example would be to open a common file in the user's home folder and read/write to that file (with the C&C app doing the same as well).

You can embed embedded tomcat or Jetty into your application and let it run a simple servlet/JSP - based or GWT-based web UI. In fact, when you debug/run your GWT application from Eclipse, it starts in an embedded Tomcat instance.

I found a solution by using Spring. We have modified much of our Command and Control app to use Spring IoC, and then we used other Spring libraries to extend its functionality. To interact with GWT, we exposed services and used httpInvokers to make calls from the GWT server code.
Of course, this meant we needed to use Spring with our GWT application too in order to make the http calls from the GWT server code. But all is working.

you dont have direct control on the client system with JavaScript (which GWT is based on). in your use-case that wouldn't even make sense, why using an external server for a website controlling a local program?
If you reverse this (the app server is running on the same system as the C&C software, and the web client is available from everywhere) than that would be possible, but that wouldn't have much to do with GWT. On the server you can write normal java code. GWT just would be used for the web GUI and the RPC-calls to the server.
The call to the C&C software from the app server could be realised with the following line (windows example):
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("C:\\PathTo\\Program.exe")
This function return a instance of class Process which provides an Input- and OutputStream to simulate user input and to read and process the programs output.
Please note that you lose platform independence with this method, because the parameter for exec() looks different for every OS.
EDIT
After re-reading your question, it would even make more sense to integrate the C&C software into the server code directly, as the comment on your question suggests. you need a application server to use GWT-RPC, not a webserver, but thats hairsplitting.
Informations on how GWT-RPC generally works can be found here: (tutorial), (detailed description)

Java application with JNI

I am new to java and want to develop a java application which will run continuously like a server.
Is it possible in Java to develop a UI less application which will work continuously? This application should also have JNI support, so functions exported using JNI should get called from a C++ application.
Can anybody tell me the pointers to start?
Help is appreciated, thanks.
Vishal N

It is certainly possible to run without a UI. By the sounds of it you would like to create your Java APP as a console app and then run it as a Windows Service/Linux Daemon (You did not mention the OS). There are java service wrappers out there that lets you run your java code as a service (e.g. this one) or you could write your own.
I recommend this book to learn the JNI. Although it sounds like what you need it not really JNI but rather an interface exposed over TCP or something similar that another C++ app can use to talk to your app. JNI won't allow another process to talk to your app, it is there to extend your Java code with functionality that cannot be implemented in Java itself e.g. calling some Windows API function.
Edit:
By the way, a plain Java Hello World App like this one IS a console app:
public class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Hello, World");
}
}

Yes you can develop UI less applications in Java.
I'll expect an application server to handle multiple requests, transactions, security, life-cycle, persistence, etc.
If answer is Yes then I will choose the Java EE route to implement your requirements. I'll implement my business model using EJB3.0 and deploy in one of the application servers i.e. Glassfish, JBoss etc. which will support all features described above without reinventing the wheel.
Note: The solution will also give flexibility to expose your remote methods using WebService, CORBA or JMS.
If answer is No then I might create my own standalone server type application which will listen on some port and communicate through some bespoke protocol.
In order to support JNI -I would expect that you'd have to write a plain JavaBean wrapper or proxy. This proxy would then be used by the JNI.

Yes.
Is it possible in Java to develop a UI less application which will work continuously?
Create a thread or code main thread that will run foreever.
This application should also have JNI support, so functions exported using JNI should get called from a C++ application.
yes , have a look at here

You can certainly develop a Java application without a user interface; I think most folks would agree that it's easier than developing one with a user interface.
Regarding JNI, if I understand the question, you've got it backwards; using C++ as an example, JNI lets you call C++ code from Java, not Java code from C++.

Yes, you can run Java as service (daemon). You can simply run your code a "daemonize" it. This way, it will be detached from terminal sessions and will run in background.
Take a look here:
https://github.com/mkowsiak/jnicookbook/tree/master/recipes/recipeNo022
to see how you can run service inside C.
And here, to check out how to run service part in Java:
https://github.com/mkowsiak/jnicookbook/tree/master/recipes/recipeNo029
Have fun with JNI!

How to make my Java Swing application a Client-Server application?

I have made a Java Swing application. Now I would like to make it a Client-Server application. All clients should be notified when data on the server is changed, so I'm not looking for a Web Service. The Client-Server application will be run on a single LAN, it's a business application. The Server will contain a database, JavaDB.
What technology and library is easiest to start with? Should I implement it from scratch using Sockets, or should I use Java RMI, or maybe JMS? Or are there other alternatives that are easier to start with?
And is there any server library that I should use? Is Jetty an alternative?

Given that you have the application already, perhaps the simplest thing to do is to identify the interface that you require between the client and server, and first of all to refactor your application to use that interface to talk between the back-end/front-end within the same process.
Then you can start to split this apart. A simple solution would be to split this apart using RMI (since you're talking Java objects and have Java method calls). Spring contains useful tools to simplify/automate the RMI exposure of interfaces.
For the notification requirement, a simple UDP multicast (or broadcast) would suffice.
Note that as soon as you split your application up, you have issues re. maintaining consistent views of data, managing timely updates, handling cases when the server is down, possible loading issues when you get lots of clients etc. In a sense, splitting the application up into a client and server is just the start of a new architecture process.

Mina is a good choice as a network application framework for building a simple server for this purpose - it's a much better option than using raw sockets.
http://mina.apache.org/
If you really need an application server then you could take look at JBoss. It also provides a remoting component (as an alternative to something like Mina):
http://www.jboss.org/jbossremoting
You probably won't have much need for Enterprise Java Beans though. In most cases a simple POJO based framework is more than sufficient - you could tie this altogether with a dependency injection framework such as Guice:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/
or Spring. Keep it simple, don't use a J2EE server unless you really need to. Hope that helps.

This is much of what J2EE does, but it's a whole new learning curve because they have pre-solved many of the problems you will run into and many you may not and therefore add on a lot of new technologies.
But at it's most basic, J2EE answers just that question.

I worked in a project like this. We implemented Client-Side Swing and Server side with J2EE. We used EJB,Stateless beans and Message Driven Beans.Also I have been in a device tracking, management project. Our clients were trucks+Swing users and We have used Servets+TCP/UDP,Apache Mina framework to handle and keep connections.

I have been working in Java Swing Client/Server applications for almost 3 years. I would suggest you to go for RMI/EJBs. The initial application that we developed was doing this using RMI/EJB for client-server communication with WebLogic being the server.
But we later found out that there are lot of "browser-like" features to be included to the application such as session-timeout etc., So, we used the BrightSide Framework which wraps the RMI calls through HTTP. One more enhancment we made is that we replaced Weblogic with the open source JBoss server.
The wrapping of calls with HTTP will become very handy and you can make your swing applications really rich. Later, when the situation demands for you to use a website strictly, you can deploy your swing using jnlp.
Hope this helped.