So I'm not sure if I understand how this works and would like
a simple explanation to how they work is all. I probably have it way off. A pure regex solution is required, and I don't know if this is possible. If it is, a solution would be awesome too, but a shove in the right direction would be good for my learning process ^_^
This is how I thought the if/then/else option built into my regex engines was formatted:
?(condition)if regex|else regex
I want it to capture a string from a very specific location only when this string exists within a certain section of javascript. Because this is how I thought it worked after a decent amount of research I tried out a few variations of this code but they all ended up something like this.
((?^view_large$)Tables-137(.*?)search.htm)
Also of relevance: I'm using an java based app that has regex searches which pull the data I need so I cannot write an if statement in java which would be my preferred method. It's a pain to have to do it this way, but at the moment I have no other choice. I'm trying really hard for them to allow java code functionality instead of pure regex for more versatile options.
So to summarize, is there even a if/then option in regex and if so how is it formatted for what I'm trying to accomplish?
EDIT: The string that I want to be the "if condition" is like this: if view_large string exists and is not null then capture the exact string 500/ which is captured within the catch all group I used: (.*?)
There is no conditionals in Java regexp, but you can simulate them by writing two expressions that include mutually exclusive look-behind constructs, like this:
((?<=if )then)|((?<!if )end)
This expression will match "then" when it is preceded by an "if "; it will match "end" when it is not preceded by an "if "
The Javadoc for java.util.regex.Pattern mentions, in its list of "Perl constructs not supported by this class":
The conditional constructs (?(condition)X) and (?(condition)X|Y).
So, no dice. But you should look through the Javadoc to see if you can achieve what you need by using regex features that it does support. (Or, if you post some more detailed examples, we can try to help.)
Try lookaround assertions.
For example, say you want to capture FOOBAR only if there is a 4+ digit number somewhere:
(?=.*\d{4}).*(FOOBAR)
Related
Now I am trying to match some patterns from a String containing elasticsearch's structured bulk requests. Here is an example:
index {[event_20191209][event][null], source[{"haha":"haha","jaja":"jaja"}]}, update {[event_20191209][event][xxx], doc_as_upsert[false], doc[index {[null][_doc][null], source[{"haha":"haha","jaja":"jaja"}]}], scripted_upsert[false], detect_noop[true]}, delete {[event_20191208][_doc][sjdos]}, update {[event_20191209][event][yyy], doc_as_upsert[false], upsert[index {[null][_doc][null], source[{"haha":"haha","jaja":"jaja"}]}], scripted_upsert[false], detect_noop[true]}
My goal is to match every separate request out of the bulk requests string, i.e to get strings like:
index {[event_20191209][event][null], source[{"haha":"haha","jaja":"jaja"}]},
update {[event_20191209][event][xxx], doc_as_upsert[false], doc[index {[null][_doc][null], source[{"haha":"haha","jaja":"jaja"}]}], scripted_upsert[false], detect_noop[true]},
delete {[event_20191208][_doc][sjdos]},
update {[event_20191209][event][yyy], doc_as_upsert[false], upsert[index {[null][_doc][null], source[{"haha":"haha","jaja":"jaja"}]}], scripted_upsert[false], detect_noop[true]}
And my pattern expression is [a-z]+\s\{.+?\}[,\w\t\r\n]+? which works fine on a Javascript based regular expression online tester like below:
However, when I copied this pattern expression to my Java code, the output was not what I expected. It was like this:
So I realized there exists some differences between Javascript and Java regular expression engine, but I cannot figure out how to update my expression so that it could work well in Java after so much coding and googling.
I would be so grateful if someone could give me some favor or hint for this.
After a short nap, I found epiphany. I was a fool in the morning....
The workaround is so easy to implement. Elasticsearch has well overridden toString() for us.
At first glance, I wouldn't suggest using regex right away. It looks like those lines follow some kind of pattern that you could parse and split up first.
After that, if you're talking about regex, I'd try:
Taking a look at the java regex format: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
How about using an online java regex tool instead?
I'm trying to write a regex that finds all variables (and only variables, ignoring methods completely) in a given piece of JavaScript code. The actual code (the one which executes regex) is written in Java.
For now, I've got something like this:
Matcher matcher=Pattern.compile(".*?([a-z]+\\w*?).*?").matcher(string);
while(matcher.find()) {
System.out.println(matcher.group(1));
}
So, when value of "string" is variable*func()*20
printout is:
variable
func
Which is not what I want. The simple negation of ( won't do, because it makes regex catch unnecessary characters or cuts them off, but still functions are captured. For now, I have the following code:
Matcher matcher=Pattern.compile(".*?(([a-z]+\\w*)(\\(?)).*?").matcher(formula);
while(matcher.find()) {
if(matcher.group(3).isEmpty()) {
System.out.println(matcher.group(2));
}
}
It works, the printout is correct, but I don't like the additional check. Any ideas? Please?
EDIT (2011-04-12):
Thank you for all answers. There were questions, why would I need something like that. And you are right, in case of bigger, more complicated scripts, the only sane solution would be parsing them. In my case, however, this would be excessive. The scraps of JS I'm working on are intented to be simple formulas, something like (a+b)/2. No comments, string literals, arrays, etc. Only variables and (probably) some built-in functions. I need variables list to check if they can be initalized and this point (and initialized at all). I realize that all of it can be done manually with RPN as well (which would be safer), but these formulas are going to be wrapped with bigger script and evaluated in web browser, so it's more convenient this way.
This may be a bit dirty, but it's assumed that whoever is writing these formulas (probably me, for most of the time), knows what is doing and is able to check if they are working correctly.
If anyone finds this question, wanting to do something similar, should now the risks/difficulties. I do, at least I hope so ;)
Taking all the sound advice about how regex is not the best tool for the job into consideration is important. But you might get away with a quick and dirty regex if your rule is simple enough (and you are aware of the limitations of that rule):
Pattern regex = Pattern.compile(
"\\b # word boundary\n" +
"[A-Za-z]# 1 ASCII letter\n" +
"\\w* # 0+ alnums\n" +
"\\b # word boundary\n" +
"(?! # Lookahead assertion: Make sure there is no...\n" +
" \\s* # optional whitespace\n" +
" \\( # opening parenthesis\n" +
") # ...at this position in the string",
Pattern.COMMENTS);
This matches an identifier as long as it's not followed by a parenthesis. Of course, now you need group(0) instead of group(1). And of course this matches lots of other stuff (inside strings, comments, etc.)...
If you are rethinking using regex and wondering what else you could do, you could consider using an AST instead to access your source programatically. This answer shows you could use the Eclipse Java AST to build a syntax tree for Java source. I guess you could do similar for Javascript.
A regex won't cut in this case because Java isn't regular. Your best best is to get a parser that understands Java syntax and build onto that. Luckily, ANTLR has a Java 1.6 grammar (and 1.5 grammar).
For your rather limited use case you could probably easily extend the variable assignment rules and get the info you need. It's a bit of a learning curve but this will probably be your best best for a quick and accurate solution.
It's pretty well established that regex cannot be reliably used to parse structured input. See here for the famous response: RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tags
As any given sequence of characters may or may not change meaning depending on previous or subsequent sequences of characters, you cannot reliably identify a syntactic element without both lexing and parsing the input text. Regex can be used for the former (breaking an input stream into tokens), but cannot be used reliably for the latter (assigning meaning to tokens depending on their position in the stream).
I'm writing a small app that reads some input and do something based on that input.
Currently I'm looking for a line that ends with, say, "magic", I would use String's endsWith method. It's pretty clear to whoever reads my code what's going on.
Another way to do it is create a Pattern and try to match a line that ends with "magic". This is also clear, but I personally think this is an overkill because the pattern I'm looking for is not complex at all.
When do you think it's worth using RegEx Java? If it's complexity, how would you personally define what's complex enough?
Also, are there times when using Patterns are actually faster than string manipulation?
EDIT: I'm using Java 6.
Basically: if there is a non-regex operation that does what you want in one step, always go for that.
This is not so much about performance, but about a) readability and b) compile-time-safety. Specialized non-regex versions are usually a lot easier to read than regex-versions. And a typo in one of these specialized methods will not compile, while a typo in a Regex will fail miserably at runtime.
Comparing Regex-based solutions to non-Regex-bases solutions
String s = "Magic_Carpet_Ride";
s.startsWith("Magic"); // non-regex
s.matches("Magic.*"); // regex
s.contains("Carpet"); // non-regex
s.matches(".*Carpet.*"); // regex
s.endsWith("Ride"); // non-regex
s.matches(".*Ride"); // regex
In all these cases it's a No-brainer: use the non-regex version.
But when things get a bit more complicated, it depends. I guess I'd still stick with non-regex in the following case, but many wouldn't:
// Test whether a string ends with "magic" in any case,
// followed by optional white space
s.toLowerCase().trim().endsWith("magic"); // non-regex, 3 calls
s.matches(".*(?i:magic)\\s*"); // regex, 1 call, but ugly
And in response to RegexesCanCertainlyBeEasierToReadThanMultipleFunctionCallsToDoTheSameThing:
I still think the non-regex version is more readable, but I would write it like this:
s.toLowerCase()
.trim()
.endsWith("magic");
Makes the whole difference, doesn't it?
You would use Regex when the normal manipulations on the String class are not enough to elegantly get what you need from the String.
A good indicator that this is the case is when you start splitting, then splitting those results, then splitting those results. The code is getting unwieldy. Two lines of Pattern/Regex code can clean this up, neatly wrapped in a method that is unit tested....
Anything that can be done with regex can also be hand-coded.
Use regex if:
Doing it manually is going to take more effort without much benefit.
You can easily come up with a regex for your task.
Don't use regex if:
It's very easy to do it otherwise, as in your example.
The string you're parsing does not lend itself to regex. (it is customary to link to this question)
I think you are best with using endsWith. Unless your requirements change, it's simpler and easier to understand. Might perform faster too.
If there was a bit more complexity, such as you wanted to match "magic", "majik', but not "Magic" or "Majik"; or you wanted to match "magic" followed by a space and then 1 word such as "... magic spoon" but not "...magic soup spoon", then I think RegEx would be a better way to go.
Any complex parsing where you are generating a lot of Objects would be better done with RegEx when you factor in both computing power, and brainpower it takes to generate the code for that purpose. If you have a RegEx guru handy, it's almost always worthwhile as the patterns can easily be tweaked to accommodate for business rule changes without major loop refactoring which would likely be needed if you used pure java to do some of the complex things RegEx does.
If your basic line ending is the same everytime, such as with "magic", then you are better of using endsWith.
However, if you have a line that has the same base, but can have multiple values, such as:
<string> <number> <string> <string> <number>
where the strings and numbers can be anything, you're better of using RegEx.
Your lines are always ending with a string, but you don't know what that string is.
If it's as simple as endsWith, startsWith or contains, then you should use these functions. If you are processing more "complex" strings and you want to extract information from these strings, then regexp/matchers can be used.
If you have something like "commandToRetrieve someNumericArgs someStringArgs someOptionalArgs" then regexp will ease your task a lot :)
I'd never use regexes in java if I have an easier way to do it, like in this case the endsWith method. Regexes in java are as ugly as they get, probably with the only exception of the match method on String.
Usually avoiding regexes makes your core more readable and easier for other programmers. The opposite is true, complex regexes might confuse even the most experience hackers out there.
As for performance concerns: just profile. Specially in java.
If you are familiar with how regexp works you will soon find that a lot of problems are easily solved by using regexp.
Personally I look to using java String operations if that is easy, but if you start splitting strings and doing substring on those again, I'd start thinking in regular expressions.
And again, if you use regular expressions, why stop at lines. By configuring your regexp you can easily read entire files in one regular expression (Pattern.DOTALL as parameter to the Pattern.compile and your regexp don't end in the newlines). I'd combine this with Apache Commons IOUtils.toString() methods and you got something very powerful to do quick stuff with.
I would even bring out a regular expression to parse some xml if needed. (For instance in a unit test, where I want to check that some elements are present in the xml).
For instance, from some unit test of mine:
Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(
"<Monitor caption=\"(.+?)\".*?category=\"(.+?)\".*?>"
+ ".*?<Summary.*?>.+?</Summary>"
+ ".*?<Configuration.*?>(.+?)</Configuration>"
+ ".*?<CfgData.*?>(.+?)</CfgData>", Pattern.DOTALL);
which will match all segments in this xml and pick out some segments that I want to do some sub matching on.
I would suggest using a regular expression when you know the format of an input but you are not necessarily sure on the value (or possible value(s)) of the formatted input.
What I'm saying, if you have an input all ending with, in your case, "magic" then String.endsWith() works fine (seeing you know that your possible input value will end with "magic").
If you have a format e.g a RFC 5322 message format, one cannot clearly say that all email address can end with a .com, hence you can create a regular expression that conforms to the RFC 5322 standard for verification.
In a nutshell, if you know a format structure of your input data but don't know exactly what values (or possible values) you can receive, use regular expressions for validation.
There's a saying that goes:
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems. (link).
For a simple test, I'd proceed exactly like you've done. If you find that it's getting more complicated, then I'd consider Regular Expressions only if there isn't another way.
I need to tokenize some strings which will be splitted of according to operators like = and !=. I was successful using regex until the string has != operator. In my case, string was seperated into two parts, which is expected but ! mark is in the left side even it is part of given operator. Therefore, I believe that regex is not suitable for it and I want to benefit from lex. Since I do not have enough knowledge and experience with lex, I am not sure whether it fits my work or not. Basically, I am trying to do replace the right hand side of the operators with actual values from other data. Do you people think that can it be helpful for my case?
Thanks.
Should you use lex? It depends how complex your language is. It's a very powerful tool, worth understanding (especially with yacc, or in Java you could use antlr or javacc).
public String[] split(String regex) does take a regex, not just a string. You could use the regex "!?=", which means zero or one ! followed by =. But the problem with using split is that it won't tell you what the actual delimiter was.
With what little info we have about your application, I'd be tempted to use regular expressions. There are lots of experts here on stackoverflow to help. A great place to start is the Java regex tutorial.
(Thanks to Falle1234 for picking up my mistake - now corrected.)
InputString: A soldier may have bruises , wounds , marks , dislocations or other Injuries that hurt him .
ExpectedOutput:
bruises
wounds
marks
dislocations
Injuries
Generalized Pattern Tried:
".[\s]?(\w+?)"+ // bruises.
"(?:(\s)?,(\s)?(\w+?))*"+ // wounds marks dislocations
"[\s]?(?:or|and) other (\w+)."; // Injuries
The pattern should be able to match other input strings like: A soldier may have bruiser or other injuries that hurt him.
On trying the generalized pattern above, the output is:
bruises
dislocations
Injuries
There is something wrong with the capturing group for "(?:(\s)?,(\s)?(\w+?))*". The capturing group has one more occurences.. but it returns only "dislocations". "marks" and "dislocation: are devoured.
Could you please suggest what should be the right pattern, and where is the mistake?
This question comes closest to this question, but that solution didn't help.
Thanks.
When the capture group is annotated with a quantifier [ie: (foo)*] then you will only get the last match. If you wanted to get all of them then you need to quantifier inside the capture and then you will have to manually parse out the values. As big a fan as I am of regex, I don't think it's appropriate here for any number of reasons... even if you weren't ultimately doing NLP.
How to fix: (?:(\s)?,(\s)?(\w+?))*
Well, the quantifier basically covers the whole regex in that case and you might as well use Matcher.find() to step through each match. Also, I'm curious why you have capture groups for the whitespace. If all you are trying to do is find a comma-separated set of words then that's something like: \w+(?:\s*,\s*\w+)* Then don't bother with capture groups and just split the whole match.
And for anything more complicated re: NLP, GATE is a pretty powerful tool. The learning curve is steep at times but you have a whole industry of science-guys to draw from: http://gate.ac.uk/
Regex in not suited for (natural) language processing. With regex, you can only match well defined patterns. You should really, really abandon the idea of doing this with regex.
You may want to start a new question where you specify what programming language you're using to perform this task and ask for pointers there.
EDIT
PSpeed posted a promising link to a 3rd party library, Gate, that's able to do many language processing tasks. And it's written in Java. I have not used it myself, but looking at the people/institutions working on it, it seems pretty solid.
The pattern that works is: \w+(?:\s*,\s*\w+)* and then manually separate CSV
There is no other method to do this with Java Regex.
Ideally, Java regex is not suitable for NLP. A useful tool for text mining is: gate.ac.uk
Thanks to Bart K. , and PSpeed.