Java Object Serialization issue - java

I have some input that I add to a serialized object.
Now when I read the serialized object, I want to check if it exists... If not loop till it has a value in it.
How do i modify the deserialization function to handle that.
There is basically a delay in populating my serializable object. So in the meantime if i were to read that object, it is going to be empty. I want to put a check to read only when it has data in it. if not it should wait till it has some data
public String _displayResults(){
String SomeData = "";
try {
FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream("SomeDataobj");
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(fis);
SomeData = (String)ois.readObject();
ois.close();
}
catch(Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception during deserialization: ");
}
return SomeData;
}
What I tried:
added a wait condition for 2 secs for 10 times... Is there a cleaner way.
while ( ois.readObject().toString().equalsIgnoreCase("") && i <10){
Thread.sleep(2000);
i++;
}

Java provides an API called Externalizable, which allows you to customize the (de) serialization. Serialiazable is marker interface and that indicates the object can be wrote to output stream. Externalizable provides two methods readExternal() and writeExternal() where you can override the behavior.
Your question is not so clear about what you want to achieve, so I am not sure if the above information is helpful for you

Related

How to use ByteArray for object serialisation and deserialisation

Context
I'm doing my student project and building a testing tool for regression testing.
Main idea: capture all constructors/methods/functions invocations using AOP during runtime and record all data into a database. Later retrieve the data, run constructors/methods/functions in the same order, and compare return values.
Problem
I'm trying to serialize objects (and arrays of objects) into a byte array, record it into PostgreSQL as a blob, and later (in another runtime) retrieve that blob and deserialize it back to object. But when I deserialize data in another runtime it changes and, for example, instead of boolean, I retrieve int. If I do exactly the same operations in the same runtime (serialize - insert into the database - SELECT from the database - deserialize) everything seems to work correctly.
Here is how I record data:
private void writeInvocationRecords(InvocationData invocationData, boolean isConstructor) {
final List<InvocationData> invocationRecords = isConstructor ? constructorInvocationRecords : methodInvocationRecords;
final String recordsFileName = isConstructor ? "constructor_invocation_records.json" : "method_invocation_records.json";
byte[] inputArgsBytes = null;
ByteArrayOutputStream bos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ObjectOutputStream out = null;
try {
out = new ObjectOutputStream(bos);
out.writeObject(invocationData.inputArgs);
out.flush();
inputArgsBytes = bos.toByteArray();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
bos.close();
} catch (IOException ex) {
// ignore close exception
}
}
byte[] returnValueBytes = null;
ByteArrayOutputStream rvBos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ObjectOutputStream rvOut = null;
try {
rvOut = new ObjectOutputStream(rvBos);
rvOut.writeObject(invocationData.returnValue);
rvOut.flush();
returnValueBytes = rvBos.toByteArray();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
rvBos.close();
} catch (IOException ex) {
// ignore close exception
}
}
invocationRecords.add(invocationData);
if (invocationRecords.size() >= (isConstructor ? CONSTRUCTORS_CACHE_SIZE : METHODS_CACHE_SIZE)) {
List<InvocationData> tempRecords = new ArrayList<InvocationData>(invocationRecords);
invocationRecords.clear();
try {
for (InvocationData record : tempRecords) {
SerialBlob blob = new javax.sql.rowset.serial.SerialBlob(inputArgsBytes);
SerialBlob rvBlob = new javax.sql.rowset.serial.SerialBlob(returnValueBytes);
psInsert.setString(1, record.className);
psInsert.setString(2, record.methodName);
psInsert.setArray(3, conn.createArrayOf("text", record.inputArgsTypes));
psInsert.setBinaryStream(4, blob.getBinaryStream());
psInsert.setString(5, record.returnValueType);
psInsert.setBinaryStream(6, rvBlob.getBinaryStream());
psInsert.setLong(7, record.invocationTimeStamp);
psInsert.setLong(8, record.invocationTime);
psInsert.setLong(9, record.orderId);
psInsert.setLong(10, record.threadId);
psInsert.setString(11, record.threadName);
psInsert.setInt(12, record.objectHashCode);
psInsert.setBoolean(13, isConstructor);
psInsert.executeUpdate();
}
conn.commit();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Here is how I retrieve data:
List<InvocationData> constructorsData = new LinkedList<InvocationData>();
List<InvocationData> methodsData = new LinkedList<InvocationData>();
Statement st = conn.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = st.executeQuery(SQL_SELECT);
while (rs.next()) {
Object returnValue = new Object();
byte[] returnValueByteArray = new byte[rs.getBinaryStream(7).available()];
returnValueByteArray = rs.getBytes(7);
final String returnType = rs.getString(6);
ByteArrayInputStream rvBis = new ByteArrayInputStream(returnValueByteArray);
ObjectInputStream rvIn = null;
try {
rvIn = new ObjectInputStream(rvBis);
switch (returnType) {
case "boolean":
returnValue = rvIn.readBoolean();
break;
case "double":
returnValue = rvIn.readDouble();
break;
case "int":
returnValue = rvIn.readInt();
break;
case "long":
returnValue = rvIn.readLong();
break;
case "char":
returnValue = rvIn.readChar();
break;
case "float":
returnValue = rvIn.readFloat();
break;
case "short":
returnValue = rvIn.readShort();
break;
default:
returnValue = rvIn.readObject();
break;
}
rvIn.close();
rvBis.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
if (rvIn != null) {
rvIn.close();
}
} catch (IOException ex) {
// ignore close exception
}
}
Object[] inputArguments = new Object[0];
byte[] inputArgsByteArray = new byte[rs.getBinaryStream(5).available()];
rs.getBinaryStream(5).read(inputArgsByteArray);
ByteArrayInputStream bis = new ByteArrayInputStream(inputArgsByteArray);
ObjectInput in = null;
try {
in = new ObjectInputStream(bis);
inputArguments = (Object[])in.readObject();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
try {
if (in != null) {
in.close();
}
} catch (IOException ex) {
// ignore close exception
}
}
InvocationData invocationData = new InvocationData(
rs.getString(2),
rs.getString(3),
(String[])rs.getArray(4).getArray(),
inputArguments,
rs.getString(6),
returnValue,
rs.getLong(8),
rs.getLong(9),
rs.getLong(10),
rs.getLong(11),
rs.getString(12),
rs.getInt(13)
);
if (rs.getBoolean(14)) {
constructorsData.add(invocationData);
} else {
methodsData.add(invocationData);
}
}
st.close();
rs.close();
conn.close();
An explosion of errors and misguided ideas inherent in this question:
Your read and write code is broken.
available() doesn't work. Well, it does what the javadoc says it does, and if you read the javadoc, and read it very carefully, you should come to the correct conclusion that what that is, is utterly useless. If you ever call available(), you've messed up. You're doing so here. More generally your read and write code doesn't work. For example, .read(byteArr) also doesn't do what you think it does. See below.
The entire principle behind what you're attempting to do, doesn't work
You can't 'save the state' of arbitrary objects, and if you want to push the idea, then if you can, then certainly not in the way you're doing it, and in general this is advanced java that involves hacking the JDK itself to get at it: Think of an InputStream that represents data flowing over a network connection. What do you imagine the 'serialization' of this InputStream object should look like? If you consider serialization as 'just represent the underlying data in memory', then what you'd get is a number that represents the OS 'pipe handle', and possibly some IP, port, and sequence numbers. This is a tiny amount of data, and all this data is completely useless - it doesn't say anything meaningful about that connection and this data cannot be used to reconstitute it, at all. Even within the 'scope' of a single session (i.e. where you serialize, and then deserialize almost immediately afterwards), as networks are a stream and once you grab a byte (or send a byte), it's gone. The only useful, especially for the notion of 'lets replay everything that happened as a test', serialization strategy involves actually 'recording' all the bytes that were picked up, as it happens, on the fly. This is not a thing that you can do as a 'moment in time' concept, it's continuous. You need a system that is recording all the things (it needs to be recording every inputstream, every outputstream, every time System.currentTimeMillis() in invoked, every time a random number is generated, etc), and then needs to use the results of recording it all when your API is asked to 'save' an arbitrary state.
Serialization instead is a thing that objects need to opt into, and where they may have to write custom code to properly deal with it. Not all objects can even be serialized (an InputStream representing a network pipe, as above, is one example of an object that cannot be serialized), and for some, serializing them requires some fancy footwork, and the only hope you have is that the authors of the code that powers this object put in that effort. If they didn't, there is nothing you can do.
The serialization framework of java awkwardly captures both of these notions. It does mean that your code, even if you fix the bugs in it, will fail on most objects that can exist in a JVM. Your testing tool can only be used to test the most simplistic code.
If you're okay with that, read on. But if not, you need to completely rethink what you're going to do with this.
ObjectOutputStream sucks
This is not just my opinion, the openjdk team itself is broadly in agreement (they probably wouldn't quite put it like that, of course). The data emitted by OOS is a weird, inefficient, and underspecced binary blob. You can't analyse this data in any feasible way other than spending a few years reverse engineering the protocol, or just deserializing it (which requires having all the classes, and a JVM - this can be an acceptable burden, depends on your use case).
Contrast to e.g. Jackson which serializes data into JSON, which you can parse with your eyeballs, or in any language, and even without the relevant class files. You can construct 'serialized JSON' yourself without the benefit of first having an object (for testing purposes this sounds like a good idea, no? You need to test this testing framework too!).
How do I fix this code?
If you understand all the caveats above and somehow still conclude that this project, as written and continuing to use the ObjectOutputStream API is still what you want to do (I really, really doubt that's the right call):
Use the newer APIs. available() does not return the size of that blob. read(someByteArray) is not guaranteed to fill the entire byte array. Just read the javadoc, it spells it out.
There is no way to determine the size of an inputstream by asking that inputstream. You may be able to ask the DB itself (usually, LENGTH(theBlobColumn) works great in a SELECT query.
If you somehow (e.g. using LENGTH(tbc)) know the full size, you can use InputStream's readFully method, which will actually read all bytes, vs. read, which reads at least 1, but is not guaranteed to read all of it. The idea is: It'll read the smallest chunk that is available. Imagine a network pipe where bytes are dribbling into the network card's buffer, one byte a second. If so far 250 bytes have dribbled in and you call .read(some500SizeByteArr), then you get 250 bytes (250 of the 500 bytes are filled in, and 250 is returned). If you call .readFully(some500SizeByteArr), then the code will wait about 250 seconds, and then returns 500, and fills in all 500 bytes. That's the difference, and that explains why read works the way it does. Said differently: If you do not check what read() is returning, your code is definitely broken.
If you do not know how much data there is, your only option involves a while loop, or to call a helper method that does that. You need to make a temporary byte array, then in a loop keep calling read until it returns -1. For every loop, take the bytes in that array from 0 to (whatever the read call returned), and send these bytes someplace else. For example, a ByteArrayOutputStream.
Class matching
when I deserialize data in another runtime it changes and, for example, instead of boolean, I retrieve int
The java serialization system isn't magically changing your stuff on you. Well, put a pin that. Most likely the class file available in the first run (where you saved the blob in the db) was different vs what it looked like in your second run. Voila, problem.
More generally this is a problem in serialization. If you serialize, say, class Person {Date dob; String name;}, and then in a later version of the software you realize that using a j.u.Date to store a date of birth is a very silly idea, as Date is an unfortunately named class (it represents an instant in time and not a date at all), so you replace it with a LocalDate instead, thus ending up with class Person{LocalDate dob; String name;}, then how do you deal with the problem that you now want to deserialize a BLOB that was made back when the Person.class file still had the broken Date dob; field?
The answer is: You can't. Java's baked in serialization mechanism will flat out throw an exception here, it will not try to do this. This is the serialVersionUID system: Classes have an ID and changing anything about them (such as that field) changes this ID; the ID is stored in the serialized data. If the IDs don't match, deserialization cannot be done. You can force the ID (make a field called serialVersionUID - you can search the web for how to do that), but then you'd still get an error, java's deserializer will attempt to deserialize a Date object into a LocalDate dob; field and will of course fail.
Classes can write their own code to solve this problem. This is non-trivial and is irrelevant to you, as you're building a framework and presumably can't pop in and write code for your testing framework's userbase's custom class files.
I told you to put a pin in 'the serialization mechanism isnt going to magically change types on you'. Put in sufficient effort with overriding serialVersionUID and such and you can end up there. But that'd be because you wrote code that confuses types, e.g. in your readObject implementation (again, search the web for java's serialization mechanism, readObject/writeObject - or just start reading the javadoc of java.io.Serializable, that's a good starting-off point).
Style issues
You create objects for no purpose, you seem to have some trouble with the distinction between a variable/reference and an object. You aren't using try-with-resources. The way your SELECT calls are made suggests you have an SQL injection security issue. e.printStackTrace() as line line in a catch block is always incorrect.

Why does ObjectInput/OutputStream lose object references when reading and writing to file?

I have two classes that interact:
Shelf, that stores CDs, DVDs, PaperMedias:
public class Shelf {
private ArrayList<CD> cds;
private ArrayList<DVD> dvds;
private ArrayList<PaperMedia> paperMedias;
...etc
And Customer :
public class Customer implements Serializable {
private Map<PhysicalMedia, Calendar> mediaOwned;
private Map<PhysicalMedia,Calendar> mediaReturned;
private Map<PhysicalMedia,CalendarPeriod> mediaOnHold;
...etc
Physical media is a parent of CD,DVD,PaperMedia.
First I will initialize shelf with some items, and customer to have a few of these items borrowed. Then I save these objects to ShelfObjects.txt and CustomerObjects.txt.
When I read these objects once again from these files, it seems like link between these two is lost , specifically between PhysicalMedia of customer and PhysicalMedia of shelf. These should definitely have the same reference for example Metallica CD should have same reference in Shelf as in Customer's account.
So when i change say a status of Metallica CD, it wont update it in the other source!
Is there a was to preserve this reference ?
I load and save media in the following way in CustomerDatabase class:
public class CustomersDatabase implements Serializable {
private ArrayList<Customer> customers = new ArrayList<Customer>();
//etc..
public void load() {
try {
ObjectInputStream in = new ObjectInputStream(new FileInputStream("CustomersObject.txt"));
try {
customers.clear();
while(true) {
customers.add((Customer)in.readObject());
}
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
System.out.println("Customer class in file wasn't found");
}
in.close();
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
System.out.println("File not found");
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("\n^ Customer load successful\n");
}
public void save() {
try {
ObjectOutputStream out = new ObjectOutputStream(new FileOutputStream("CustomersObject.txt",false));
for (int i=0;i<customers.size();i++) {
out.writeObject(customers.get(i));
}
out.close();
System.out.println("\nCustomer save successful\n");
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
System.out.println("File not found");
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("IO exception ");
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
I do similar load and store in Shelf class.
The problem is that you are storing your two databases using two separate files using two separate object serialization streams.
The reason that your current approach doesn't work for you is that the Object Serialization protocol stores object references as simple numbers. It numbers the objects in a stream as 1, 2, 3, and so on, and uses those numbers to refer to previously serialized objects in the stream.
This works within the context of one stream. But when you have two or more streams, a given object is likely to have different numbers in each stream. That means that there is no way for the readObject method to know that two objects in two different streams should actually be linked together.
The simple solution is to do is something like this:
ObjectInputStream in = new ObjectInputStream(new FileInputStream("DB.txt"));
for (int i = 0; i < customers.size(); i++) {
out.writeObject(customers.get(i));
}
for (int i = 0; i < shelves.size(); i++) {
out.writeObject(shelves.get(i));
}
Or better still, serialize the customers and shelves lists directly, because that will simplify the deserialization.
(Yes ... this messes up you current code structure. You would have to load and save the Customer and Shelf databases in the same place, or pass an open stream around the place.)
It is also possible to store the objects in two separate files, but you need to use custom serialization methods to do it.
First you need to decide which file you want each shared child object to go into; i.e. do the PhysicalMedia objects get stored in the Customer database or the Shelf database?
For each shared object class, define an identifier field of an appropriate type; e.g. String or `long. Modify your code-base so that the field is populated with values that are unique in the context of the application.
For the database where you want to objects to live, serialize as normal.
For the other databases, use Object Serialization advanced functionality to:
on write, replace the objects with (just) their identifiers, and
on read, lookup the identifiers in the first database and then insert the object looked up into the deserialized object.
The last will require deep knowledge of the Object Serialization APIs, custom serialization, and so on. In your example, you have the added complexity that the objects you want to substitute are keys in Map objects. Since you can't add custom readObject and writeObject for a standard map class, you will need to do deep tricks in custom subclasses of the Stream classes themselves. (And ... no, I can't give you an example!)
Aside: this kind of thing is one of the reasons why it is inadvisable to use object serialization to implement a database. It is better to use a real database, and ORM technology such as JPA (e.g. Hibernate). There are other reasons too.

Sending serialized Objects multiple times over a Socket

The client sends specific Objects multiple times over a socket to the server. Code looks like this:
public void send(Operation operation, Object o){
try{
out.writeObject(operation);
if (o != null) out.writeObject(o);
out.flush();
} catch (IOException e) {
System.err.println("Couldn't write to OutputStream");
}
}
In the Object is a HashMap from Integer to Integer, thats altering very often.
The Server accepts the Message with:
User newUser = (User) oin.readObject();
The first time everything works well, the newUser Objects contains of the new received Object.
But after the second, third, ... execution, the newUser Object always reads the old Object (the HashMap contains the old Values from the first communication).
What am i doing wrong?
Thanks in advance!
You need to either call reset() regularly to stop the cache of objects building up, preventing you from seeing changes to those objects, or you need to use writeUnshared()
I would consider calling reset() before flush() each time.

How to unit test serialization with invariant checking?

I have an immutable class with invariant checking. According to Effective Java 2nd Ed item 76 it has a readObjects method that throws an InvalidObjectException if the deserialized object violates the invariants:
// readObject method with validity checking
private void readObject(ObjectInputStream s)
throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
s.defaultReadObject();
// Check that our invariants are satisfied
if (/* some condition*/)
throw new InvalidObjectException("Invariant violated");
}
I know how to test serialization and deserialization, but this tests only the happy path. There is an ugly way of triggering the InvalidObjectException, where you hardcode a tampered byte stream (shamelessly stolen from EJ2 item 76):
public class BogusPeriod {
// manipulated byte stream
private static final byte[] serializedForm = new byte[] {
(byte)0xac, (byte)0xed, 0x00, 0x05, /* ca. 100 more bytes omitted */ };
// Returns the object with the specified serialized form
private static Object deserializeBogusPeriod() {
try {
InputStream is = new ByteArrayInputStream(serializedForm);
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(is);
return ois.readObject();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
}
}
}
This is really ugly and will probably break as soon as the serializable class changes.
I wonder if there is a simpler method of creating test cases like that? Maybe there is a library that knows at which offsets of a byte stream specific values are located to allow tampering at run time?
You assume, that the object/class is deserializable from java (non corrupt data) and want to do some checks afterwards (like if a date in a string is formatted correct).
Writing your unit test for this, you could use a library like Serialysis (https://weblogs.java.net/blog/2007/06/12/disassembling-serialized-java-objects) to check generated byte streams by rightful streamed objects, find out where in the byte stream your data is located and modify your data during test setup.
THOUGH
IF you trust the source of your data you receive and have been able to deserialize, better use some kind of interceptor / validator provided by your framework of choice (Spring in SE, Java EE etc.) at the moment the object reaches your application.

Appending Objects to a .txt file [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:
StreamCorruptedException: invalid type code: AC
(1 answer)
Closed 5 years ago.
I was trying out a program that was given in the exercise at the end of the chapter 'Serialization'.
The program requires me to declare a class Person which encapsulates only two data members of type Name and Address , which are also classes.
Then I have to take a series of names and addresses from the keyboard , create objects and write them to the file.
However , if the FILE ALREADY EXISTS then the objects must be APPENDED to the existing file.
My program runs perfectly for the first time but for the second time , when I try to read back the appended records , I get an Exception
java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid type code: AC
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1374)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:369)
at Trial.main(Trial.java:66)
I did my bit of research on this and found that the StreamHeader can be written ONLY ONCE and appending corrupts it.
What is the way around it ???
The Object Writing Code is:
try(ObjectOutputStream stream = new ObjectOutputStream(new BufferedOutputStream(Files.newOutputStream(filePath,WRITE,CREATE,APPEND)))) {
for(int i = 0;i<name.length;i++) {
Person aPerson = new Person(name[i],address[i]);
System.out.println(aPerson);
stream.writeObject(aPerson);
stream.reset();
aPerson = null;
}
System.out.println("Writing Complete");
Yes, I've had this problem myself before... it is not possible, unfortunately.
What you could do is to place your objects into a List and persist the full list at a time. As the list is an object it can persisted just as easily. I know this is terrible as this require the entire contents to be read into memory, but it is the only way as far as I know.
The other option (which I recommend) is that you use something like JSon to commit your data. GSon works quite well for this purpose. You can then simply marshall and unmarshall your objects which can be committed to a text file. It's very easy to do as a single line of code is required to go either way (object to JSon-string and vice versa).
This works. So debug your program and see why it doesn't. Probably don't call reset()
public class ClassTest {
public static void main(String a[]) throws Exception {
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(new FileOutputStream("c:/temp/foo.txt"));
oos.writeObject(new Test("foo", "bar"));
oos.writeObject(new Test("baz", "brr"));
oos.close();
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(new FileInputStream("c:/temp/foo.txt"));
System.out.println(ois.readObject());
System.out.println(ois.readObject());
ois.close();
}
}
class Test implements Serializable {
private String fld1;
private String fld2;
public Test(String v1, String v2) {
this.fld1 = v1;
this.fld2 = v2;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Test [fld1=" + fld1 + ", fld2=" + fld2 + "]";
}
}

Categories