We Keep Coding

Spring beans initialization through method

I have a little question about bean creation that bothers me a lot.
For example I have classes
public class A {
B b;
public A(B b) {
this.b = b;
}
}
public class B {}
And I want to make beans for them like this:
#Configuration
public class Config {
#Bean
public B beanB() {
return new B();
}
//version 1
#Bean
public A beanA() {
return new A(beanB())
}
//version 2
#Bean
public A beanA(B beanB) {
return new A(beanB)
}
}
So, my question is what is the right way to create bean A?
I think that the right one is version 2, because in the version 1 I think beanB can be invoked 2 times: on the creation of beanA and when spring will create it for it's context. But I can't find anything that will prove my opinion.

The "right" way is to do it the way the documentation, i.e. the javadoc of #Bean, shows it:
#Bean Methods in #Configuration Classes
Typically, #Bean methods are declared within #Configuration classes. In this case, bean methods may reference other #Bean methods in the same class by calling them directly. This ensures that references between beans are strongly typed and navigable. Such so-called 'inter-bean references' are guaranteed to respect scoping and AOP semantics, just like getBean() lookups would. These are the semantics known from the original 'Spring JavaConfig' project which require CGLIB subclassing of each such configuration class at runtime. As a consequence, #Configuration classes and their factory methods must not be marked as final or private in this mode. For example:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public FooService fooService() {
return new FooService(fooRepository());
}
#Bean
public FooRepository fooRepository() {
return new JdbcFooRepository(dataSource());
}
// ...
}
That means version 1 in the question code.
Spring dynamically subclasses AppConfig, so only one instance is created no matter how many times the method is called, e.g. functionally something like this:
public class $dynamic$ extends AppConfig {
private FooRepository cachedFooRepository;
#Override
public FooRepository fooRepository() {
if (this.cachedFooRepository == null)
this.cachedFooRepository = super.fooRepository();
return cachedFooRepository;
}
}

Spring: Choosing constructor while Autowiring a Component

I've a Component as follows:
#Component
class A(){
private s;
public A(){}
public A(String s){this.s=s;}
}
Here is the other class Where I'm auto wiring the above class:
#Component
class B(){
#Autowire
private A a;
}
In the above autowiring, I need to use the parameterized constructor. How can I pass the constructor args?

You can't, at least not via #Autowired in B but there are other ways to do it:
Wire the parameter into A's constructor:
One constructor is annotated with #Autowired because:
As of Spring Framework 4.3, the #Autowired constructor is no longer
necessary if the target bean only defines one constructor. If several
constructors are available, at least one must be annotated to teach
the container which one it has to use.
#Component
class A(){
private s;
public A(){}
#Autowired
public A(#Value("${myval}") String s){this.s=s;}
}
Expose A as a #Bean
Straight from the docs:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public A a(#Value("${myval}") String s) {
return new A(s);
}
}
Construct A in B using an initialization callback
Docs
#Component
class B(){
private A a;
#Value("${myval}")
private String myval;
#PostConstruct
private void init()
{
a = new A(myval);
}
}

There is a concept of prototype bean which I think you require in your case. #Component will create a singleton bean and changing it in one place will change in all parent classes where this was injected.
You need to understand how to inject a prototype bean in singleton bean.
Follow this example
https://stackoverflow.com/a/25165971/949912

Just use setters instead of constructor.
If you want to create object by yourself with new keyword then this object will not be managed by container.

Inject spring bean dynamically

In a java-spring web-app I would like to be able to dynamically inject beans.
For example I have an interface with 2 different implementations:
In my app I'm using some properties file to configure injections:
#Determines the interface type the app uses. Possible values: implA, implB
myinterface.type=implA
My injections actually loaded conditionally relaying on the properties values in the properties file. For example in this case myinterface.type=implA wherever I inject MyInterface the implementation that will be injected will be ImplA (I accomplished that by extending the Conditional annotation).
I would like that during runtime - once the properties are changed the following will happen (without server restart):
The right implementation will be injected. For example when setting myinterface.type=implB ImplB will be injected where-ever MyInterface is used
Spring Environment should be refreshed with the new values and re-injected as well to beans.
I thought of refreshing my context but that creates problems.
I thought maybe to use setters for injection and re-use those setters once properties are re-configured. Is there a working practice for such a requirement?
Any ideas?
UPDATE
As some suggested I can use a factory/registry that holds both implementations (ImplA and ImplB) and returns the right one by querying the relevant property.
If I do that I still have the second challenge - the environment. for example if my registry looks like this:
#Service
public class MyRegistry {
private String configurationValue;
private final MyInterface implA;
private final MyInterface implB;
#Inject
public MyRegistry(Environmant env, MyInterface implA, MyInterface ImplB) {
this.implA = implA;
this.implB = implB;
this.configurationValue = env.getProperty("myinterface.type");
}
public MyInterface getMyInterface() {
switch(configurationValue) {
case "implA":
return implA;
case "implB":
return implB;
}
}
}
Once property has changed I should re-inject my environment. any suggestions for that?
I know I can query that env inside the method instead of constructor but this is a performance reduction and also I would like to think of an ider for re-injecting environment (again, maybe using a setter injection?).

I would keep this task as simple as possible. Instead of conditionally load one implementation of the MyInterface interface at startup and then fire an event that triggers dynamic loading of another implementation of the same interface, I would tackle this problem in a different way, that is much simpler to implement and maintain.
First of all, I'd just load all possible implementations:
#Component
public class MyInterfaceImplementationsHolder {
#Autowired
private Map<String, MyInterface> implementations;
public MyInterface get(String impl) {
return this.implementations.get(impl);
}
}
This bean is just a holder for all implementations of the MyInterface interface. Nothing magic here, just common Spring autowiring behavior.
Now, wherever you need to inject a specific implementation of MyInterface, you could do it with the help of an interface:
public interface MyInterfaceReloader {
void changeImplementation(MyInterface impl);
}
Then, for every class that needs to be notified of a change of the implementation, just make it implement the MyInterfaceReloader interface. For instance:
#Component
public class SomeBean implements MyInterfaceReloader {
// Do not autowire
private MyInterface myInterface;
#Override
public void changeImplementation(MyInterface impl) {
this.myInterface = impl;
}
}
Finally, you need a bean that actually changes the implementation in every bean that has MyInterface as an attribute:
#Component
public class MyInterfaceImplementationUpdater {
#Autowired
private Map<String, MyInterfaceReloader> reloaders;
#Autowired
private MyInterfaceImplementationsHolder holder;
public void updateImplementations(String implBeanName) {
this.reloaders.forEach((k, v) ->
v.changeImplementation(this.holder.get(implBeanName)));
}
}
This simply autowires all beans that implement the MyInterfaceReloader interface and updates each one of them with the new implementation, which is retrieved from the holder and passed as an argument. Again, common Spring autowiring rules.
Whenever you want the implementation to be changed, you should just invoke the updateImplementations method with the name of the bean of the new implementation, which is the lower camel case simple name of the class, i.e. myImplA or myImplB for classes MyImplA and MyImplB.
You should also invoke this method at startup, so that an initial implementation is set on every bean that implements the MyInterfaceReloader interface.

I solved a similar issue by using org.apache.commons.configuration.PropertiesConfiguration and org.springframework.beans.factory.config.ServiceLocatorFactoryBean:
Let VehicleRepairService be an interface:
public interface VehicleRepairService {
void repair();
}
and CarRepairService and TruckRepairService two classes that implements it:
public class CarRepairService implements VehicleRepairService {
#Override
public void repair() {
System.out.println("repair a car");
}
}
public class TruckRepairService implements VehicleRepairService {
#Override
public void repair() {
System.out.println("repair a truck");
}
}
I create an interface for a service factory:
public interface VehicleRepairServiceFactory {
VehicleRepairService getRepairService(String serviceType);
}
Let use Config as configuration class:
#Configuration()
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "config.test")
public class Config {
#Bean
public PropertiesConfiguration configuration(){
try {
PropertiesConfiguration configuration = new PropertiesConfiguration("example.properties");
configuration
.setReloadingStrategy(new FileChangedReloadingStrategy());
return configuration;
} catch (ConfigurationException e) {
throw new IllegalStateException(e);
}
}
#Bean
public ServiceLocatorFactoryBean serviceLocatorFactoryBean() {
ServiceLocatorFactoryBean serviceLocatorFactoryBean = new ServiceLocatorFactoryBean();
serviceLocatorFactoryBean
.setServiceLocatorInterface(VehicleRepairServiceFactory.class);
return serviceLocatorFactoryBean;
}
#Bean
public CarRepairService carRepairService() {
return new CarRepairService();
}
#Bean
public TruckRepairService truckRepairService() {
return new TruckRepairService();
}
#Bean
public SomeService someService(){
return new SomeService();
}
}
By using FileChangedReloadingStrategy your configuration be reload when you change the property file.
service=truckRepairService
#service=carRepairService
Having the configuration and the factory in your service, let you can get the appropriate service from the factory using the current value of the property.
#Service
public class SomeService {
#Autowired
private VehicleRepairServiceFactory factory;
#Autowired
private PropertiesConfiguration configuration;
public void doSomething() {
String service = configuration.getString("service");
VehicleRepairService vehicleRepairService = factory.getRepairService(service);
vehicleRepairService.repair();
}
}
Hope it helps.

If I understand you correctly then the goal is not to replace injected object instances but to use different implementations during interface method call depends on some condition at run time.
If it is so then you can try to look at the Sring TargetSource mechanism in combination with ProxyFactoryBean. The point is that proxy objects will be injected to beans that uses your interface, and all the interface method calls will be sent to TargetSource target.
Let's call this "Polymorphic Proxy".
Have a look at example below:
ConditionalTargetSource.java
#Component
public class ConditionalTargetSource implements TargetSource {
#Autowired
private MyRegistry registry;
#Override
public Class<?> getTargetClass() {
return MyInterface.class;
}
#Override
public boolean isStatic() {
return false;
}
#Override
public Object getTarget() throws Exception {
return registry.getMyInterface();
}
#Override
public void releaseTarget(Object target) throws Exception {
//Do some staff here if you want to release something related to interface instances that was created with MyRegistry.
}
}
applicationContext.xml
<bean id="myInterfaceFactoryBean" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
<property name="proxyInterfaces" value="MyInterface"/>
<property name="targetSource" ref="conditionalTargetSource"/>
</bean>
<bean name="conditionalTargetSource" class="ConditionalTargetSource"/>
SomeService.java
#Service
public class SomeService {
#Autowired
private MyInterface myInterfaceBean;
public void foo(){
//Here we have `myInterfaceBean` proxy that will do `conditionalTargetSource.getTarget().bar()`
myInterfaceBean.bar();
}
}
Also if you want to have both MyInterface implementations to be Spring beans, and the Spring context could not contains both instances at the same time then you can try to use ServiceLocatorFactoryBean with prototype target beans scope and Conditional annotation on target implementation classes. This approach can be used instead of MyRegistry.
P.S.
Probably Application Context refresh operation also can do what you want but it can cause other problems such as performance overheads.

This may be a duplicate question or at least very similar, anyway I answered this sort of question here: Spring bean partial autowire prototype constructor
Pretty much when you want a different beans for a dependency at run-time you need to use a prototype scope. Then you can use a configuration to return different implementations of the prototype bean. You will need to handle the logic on which implementation to return yourself, (they could even be returning 2 different singleton beans it doesn't matter) But say you want new beans, and the logic for returning the implementation is in a bean called SomeBeanWithLogic.isSomeBooleanExpression(), then you can make a configuration:
#Configuration
public class SpringConfiguration
{
#Bean
#Autowired
#Scope("prototype")
public MyInterface createBean(SomeBeanWithLogic someBeanWithLogic )
{
if (someBeanWithLogic .isSomeBooleanExpression())
{
return new ImplA(); // I could be a singleton bean
}
else
{
return new ImplB(); // I could also be a singleton bean
}
}
}
There should never be a need to reload the context. If for instance, you want the implementation of a bean to change at run-time, use the above. If you really need to reload your application, because this bean was used in constructors of a singleton bean or something weird, then you need to re-think your design, and if these beans are really singleton beans. You shouldn't be reloading the context to re-create singleton beans to achieve different run-time behavior, that is not needed.
Edit The first part of this answer answered the question about dynamically injecting beans. As asked, but I think the question is more of one: 'how can I change the implementation of a singleton bean at run-time'. This could be done with a proxy design pattern.
interface MyInterface
{
public String doStuff();
}
#Component
public class Bean implements MyInterface
{
boolean todo = false; // change me as needed
// autowire implementations or create instances within this class as needed
#Qualifier("implA")
#Autowired
MyInterface implA;
#Qualifier("implB")
#Autowired
MyInterface implB;
public String doStuff()
{
if (todo)
{
return implA.doStuff();
}
else
{
return implB.doStuff();
}
}
}

You can use #Resource annotation for injection as originally answered here
e.g.
#Component("implA")
public class ImplA implements MyInterface {
...
}
#Component("implB")
public class ImplB implements MyInterface {
...
}
#Component
public class DependentClass {
#Resource(name = "\${myinterface.type}")
private MyInterface impl;
}
and then set the implementation type in properties file as -
myinterface.type=implA

Be aware that - if interesting to know about - FileChangedReloadingStrategy makes your project highly dependent on the deployment conditions: the WAR/EAR should be exploded by container and your should have direct access to the file system, conditions that are not always met in all situations and environments.

You can use Spring #Conditional on a property value. Give both Beans the same name and it should work as only one Instance will be created.
Have a look here on how to use #Conditional on Services and Components:
http://blog.codeleak.pl/2015/11/how-to-register-components-using.html

public abstract class SystemService {
}
public class FooSystemService extends FileSystemService {
}
public class GoSystemService extends FileSystemService {
}
#Configuration
public class SystemServiceConf {
#Bean
#Conditional(SystemServiceCondition.class)
public SystemService systemService(#Value("${value.key}") value) {
switch (value) {
case A:
return new FooSystemService();
case B:
return new GoSystemService();
default:
throw new RuntimeException("unknown value ");
}
}
}
public class SystemServiceCondition implements Condition {
#Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext conditionContext, AnnotatedTypeMetadata annotatedTypeMetadata) {
return true;
}
}

Spring annotations confusion

i am really confused with spring annotations.
where to use # Autowired, where class is # Bean or # Component,
i understand we cannot use
Example example=new Example("String");
in Spring
but how alone
#Autowired
Example example;
will solve the purpose?
what about Example Constructor ,how spring will provide String value to Example Constructor?
i went through one of the article but it does not make much sense to me.
it would be great if some one can give me just brief and simple explanation.

Spring doesn't say you can't do Example example = new Example("String"); That is still perfectly legal if Example does not need to be a singleton bean. Where #Autowired and #Bean come into play is when you want to instantiate a class as a singleton. In Spring, any bean you annotate with #Service, #Component or #Repository would get automatically registered as a singleton bean as long as your component scanning is setup correctly. The option of using #Bean allows you to define these singletons without annotating the classes explicitly. Instead you would create a class, annotate it with #Configuration and within that class, define one or more #Bean definitions.
So instead of
#Component
public class MyService {
public MyService() {}
}
You could have
public class MyService {
public MyService() {}
}
#Configuration
public class Application {
#Bean
public MyService myService() {
return new MyService();
}
#Autowired
#Bean
public MyOtherService myOtherService(MyService myService) {
return new MyOtherService();
}
}
The trade-off is having your beans defined in one place vs annotating individual classes. I typically use both depending on what I need.

You will first define a bean of type example:
<beans>
<bean name="example" class="Example">
<constructor-arg value="String">
</bean>
</beans>
or in Java code as:
#Bean
public Example example() {
return new Example("String");
}
Now when you use #Autowired the spring container will inject the bean created above into the parent bean.

Default constructor + #Component - Annotation is enough to get #Autowired work:
#Component
public class Example {
public Example(){
this.str = "string";
}
}
You should never instantiate a concrete implementation via #Bean declaration. Always do something like this:
public interface MyApiInterface{
void doSomeOperation();
}
#Component
public class MyApiV1 implements MyApiInterface {
public void doSomeOperation() {...}
}
And now you can use it in your code:
#Autowired
private MyApiInterface _api; // spring will AUTOmaticaly find the implementation

Spring: Delegate to custom proxy wrapper for interface injection

In a very large legacy application I have interfaces and classes that do not implement those interfaces.
The interfaces are generated based on the class so the signatures are the same (except the interface adds another exception on top) and the names are similar (so it's easy to find the class name from the interface name).
To get an implementation of the interface we do a bunch of processing and logging calls but basically use java.lang.reflect.Proxy to delegate to the class. Simplified it looks like this:
// This will create a proxy and invoke handler that calls HelloWorld.doSomething
HelloWorldInterface i = MyProxyUtil.getInstance(HelloWorldInterface.class);
i.doSomething();
public interface HelloWorldInterface {
public void doSomething() throws Exception;
}
public class HelloWorld {
public void doSomething() {
//something
}
}
Is it possible with Spring annotation processing, to generically #Autowire all fields of type *Interface and have spring use MyProxyUtil.getInstance(*Interface.class) to inject the implementation?
Such that
#Autowire HelloWorldInterface a;
HelloWorldInterface b = MyProxyUtil.getInstance(HelloWorldInterface.class);
#Autowire AnotherInterface c;
AnotherInterface d = MyProxyUtil.getInstance(AnotherInterface.class);
a == b
c == d

Yes, you need to implement a AutowireCandidateResolver.
For example:
public class ProxyAutowiredCandidateResolver extends SimpleAutowireCandidateResolver {
#Override
public Object getSuggestedValue(DependencyDescriptor descriptor) {
String dependencyClassName = descriptor.getDependencyType().getSimpleName();
if (dependencyClassName.endsWith("Interface")) {
return MyProxyUtil.getInstance(descriptor.getDependencyType());
}
return super.getSuggestedValue(descriptor);
}
}
You could use a BeanFactoryPostProcessor to configure it in the application context:
public class AutowireCandidateResolverConfigurer implements BeanFactoryPostProcessor {
private AutowireCandidateResolver autowireCandidateResolver;
public void postProcessBeanFactory(
ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
DefaultListableBeanFactory bf = (DefaultListableBeanFactory) beanFactory;
bf.setAutowireCandidateResolver(autowireCandidateResolver);
}
public AutowireCandidateResolver getAutowireCandidateResolver() {
return autowireCandidateResolver;
}
public void setAutowireCandidateResolver(
AutowireCandidateResolver autowireCandidateResolver) {
this.autowireCandidateResolver = autowireCandidateResolver;
}
}
<bean id="autowireCandidateResolverConfigurer" class="AutowireCandidateResolverConfigurer">
<property name="autowireCandidateResolver">
<bean class="ProxyAutowiredCandidateResolver" />
</property>
</bean>

If I'm reading this correctly, you should be able to define them in a JavaConfig #Configuration annotated class and then use them elsewhere.
From the docs (Spring):
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public MyService myService() {
return new MyServiceImpl();
}
}
You could do something similar:
#Configuration
public class InterfaceConfig {
#Bean
public HelloWorldInterface helloWorldInterface() {
return MyProxyUtil.getInstance(HelloWorldInterface.class);
}
}
At that point, Spring would use that definition whenever that bean was needed.
You'd have to link in the #Configuration class somehow (classpath scanning, programmatically, etc), but that depends on how you're setting up your application context.
I think this should work. I've used JavaConfig quite a bit, but never quite like this. But it seems reasonable.