I am making a game in java which involves characters moving around a map and having some solid collision objects (i.e. buildings) placed around the map by reading certain data from a text file. There will be multiple maps where these objects' locations will change. My question is would painting a rectangle in a certain color that indicates collision behind such structures or would reading mouse coordinates and searching an array of these structures to see if that point lies on a building, thus denying the move or altering, be more resourceful and/or quicker. If painting a rectangle is the best, would leaving it behind the structure or deleting it after detecting for collision be better. Thanks for your time!
In my junior year in college I worked on a Collision detection system algorithm for the windows phone. It is hardly perfect but it was EXTREMELY efficient and can be adapted to a majority of games.
The way that it worked was pretty simple. There were two types of objects; Collidable objects (such as enemies or buildings) and Objects that you wish to check for collisions with these collidable objects.
I had this idea when I was going through a data structures class and we spoke about Linked Lists. I thought what if each link was a collidable object that you could stick your game objects that were already created in it. Then as the game objects moved around you would have a lightweight way of checking their locations for collisions. Thus my system was born.
All it really is, is a class that fires off either every game cycle or when ever you choose to check for collisions. You give it your players location, or bullet location or what ever object you want to see if it is colliding with something and it searches all of the collidable object locations and conducts test to see if they are overlapping.
The real efficiency of it comes into play when you add in a second element (Locations AND quadrant)
For Example if I break the phone screen up into for parts and I know which quadrant my player or bullet is in I can choose to only scan a list of collidable objects that are within that quadrant. Thus cutting your search algorithm to a fourth of its origonal size.
There are many different ways of detecting collisions. This was a simple example I used in my class to show how you could detect two circles colliding that were actually squares. As you can see simply by taking the center point coords of the circles and the radius's you can calculate the hypotenuse and determine where or if they are touching.
Good luck! if you have any questions feel free to ask!
The last reply in this posting may help you out. It is a simple maze. The structure of the maze is controlled by a data file which simply contains 0, 1 to indicate a path or a wall. You navigate through the maze using the arrow keys. When an arrow key is pressed the code checks to make sure the next square is not a wall.
Related
I'm working on a 2D sidescroller game.
Description:
Im using libGDX and the AI extension. The game will be released on android (the AI should not be heavy resurce consuming). My terrain is not grid based, it's a procedural generated polygonal height map (without caves).
There are 3 types of enemies (NPC) - near-, distance- (bullets) and combined-combat.
Entities have 3 ways to move - left, right and jump. Allso some can hover over the ground like on the picture. I tougth to make nodes with an y offset from the terrain should work but if a player jumps, a near-combat enemy couldn't have a path (I didn't test it but i assume it).
I seen many examples on grid based games but non for my scenario.
Excuse my less knowlege, I just jumed in AI devolepment a few days ago.
Questions:
Is the AI (from libGDX) compatible with an (almost) infinite world?
How should I setup nodes?
Can the AI be used to calculate bullet directions to hit a player?
First, I do not know libGDX but if you want to have an infinite world you have to program it. That means you generate the terrain randomly and destroy it in the memory if it is not needed any more. If you want infinitely go to the left and the right you have to store efficiently your world on your hard drive if the memory is full. For your polygons, you just have to store the nodes and some numbers as references to surrounding elements if you want to go back with your avatar.
Second, because your game is two-dimensional the possible paths are that simple that you need no path finding algorithms. So you do not need nodes or things like that. What you need is something like hit-boxes so that your enemies know when they hit each other. The AI needs only to know if your avatar is left or right and if it is reachable directly. That are simple geometry calculations. If it is possible to jump over other enemies it is as if they can go through them for the path.
Finally, the bullet direction is calculated simply with linear algebra to get the direct line from your avatar to your enemy. You need only to calculate if it intersects with other enemies or the terrain to know if your avatar can be hit.
The only AI aspect here is to determine the behaviour of the enemies. That can be done with a state machine, where the enemies have states like aiming, waiting, following or shooting. Depending on how far away your avatar is or how reachable it is the states change.
I've been trying various ways of creating a two-dimensional tile-based game for a few months now. I have always had each tile be a separate object of a 'Tile' class. The tile objects are stored in a two-dimensional array of objects. This has proven to be extremely impractical, mostly in terms of performance with many tiles being rendered at once. I have aided in this by only allowing tiles within a certain distance of the player being rendered, but this isn't that great either. I have also had problems with the objects returning a null-pointer exception when I try to edit the tile's values in-game. This has to do with the objects in the 2D array not being properly initialized.
Is there any other, simpler way of doing this? I can't imagine every tile-based game uses this exact way, I must be overlooking something.
EDIT: Perhaps LWJGL just isn't the correct library to use? I am having similar problems with implementing a font system with LWJGL... typing out more than a sentence will bring down the FPS by 100 or even more.
For static objects (not going anywhere, staying where they are) 1 tile = 1 object is OK. That's how it was done in Wolf3d. For moving objects you have multiple options.
You can, if you really really want to, store object sub-parts in adjacent cells/tiles when an object isn't contained fully within just one of them and crosses one or more cell/tile boundaries. But that may be not quite handy as you'd need to split your objects into parts on the fly.
A more reasonable approach is to not store moving objects in cells/tiles at all and process them more or less independently of the static objects. But then you will need to have some code to determine object visibility. Actually, in graphics the most basic performance problems come from unnecessary calculations and rendering. Generally, you don't want to even try to render what's invisible. Likewise, if some computations (especially complex ones) can be moved outside of the innermost loops, they should be.
Other than that it's pretty hard to give any specific advice given so little details about what you're doing, how you're doing it and seeing the actual code. You should really try to make your questions specific.
A two-dimensional array of Tile objects should be fine........ this is what most 2D games use and you should certainly be able to get good enough performance out of OpenGL / LWJGL to render this at a good speed (100FPS+).
Things to check:
Make sure you are clipping to only deisplay the visible set of tiles (According to the screen width and height and the player's position)
Make sure the code to draw each tile is fast... ideally you should be drawing just one textured square for each tile. In particular, you shouldn't be doing any complex operations on a per-tile basis in your rendering code.
If you're clever, you can draw multiple tiles in one OpenGL call with VBOs / clever use of texture coordinates etc. But this is probably unnecessary for a tile-based game.
I decided to make a 2d game in Java (using the slick2d library and MarteEngine) and I attempted to do it without a tiled map. It seems like my upcoming tasks are going to be very difficult without having a tiled map. Those tasks are pathing and collisions (between buildings and players/NPCs).
Is it going to be nearly impossible to easily implement a pathfinding and collisions system? I suppose I could always manually create a grid in the game but that might become kinda messy considering I'd have to move it since I have a functional camera.
Also, by collisions I mean units walking into each other and becoming a single unit. I guess that could be categorized under pathing but I have no solution to fixing them from overlapping.
Any ideas are appreciated!
A lot of games still divide the map into tiles even if it isn't a tile-based game.
The reason is that you can do collision detection by checking whether an object is overlapping any of the objects in its current tile or any of the neighbouring tiles. As long as your objects are no larger than the tiles, this collision detection scheme is guaranteed to work out all possible collisions.
EDIT
If you have exisiting graphics that are not tile-based, it is still worth using this kind of "virtual" grid for collision detection etc. You can mark specific grid squares as being wholly or partially "blocked" if you want to detect collisions with map features and suchlike.
Im making a game in Java with a few other people but we are stuck on one part of it, making the collision detection. The game is an RPG and I know how to do the collision detection with the characters using Rectangles, but what I dont know how to do is the collision detection for the maps. What I mean by that is like so the character cant walk over trees or water and that stuff but using rectangles doesnt seem like the best option here.
Well to explain what the game maps are gonna look like, here is an example http://i980.photobucket.com/albums/ae287/gordsmash/7-8.jpg
Now I could use rectangles to get bounds and stop the player from walking over the trees and water but that would take a lot of them.
But is there another easier way to prevent the player from walking over the trees and obstacles besides using Rectangles?
Here's a simple way but it uses more memory and you do the work up front... just create a background collision mask that denotes the permissible areas for characters to walk on in a binary form. You can store that in some sort of compressed bitmap form. The lookup then is very simple and very quick.
Rectangle collision detection seems to make sense; However, alternatively you may also try sphere-sphere collision detection, which can detect collision much quicker. You don't even need a square root for distance computations since you can compare the squared distances to see if the spheres overlap. This is a very fast method, and given the nature of your game could work very well.
ALSO! Assuming you have numerous tiles which you are colliding against, consider some method of spacial partitioning. Let me give you an easy example - subdivide your map into several rectangles (http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/qiuhua.liang/Research/Pic_research/mine_grid.jpg) and then depending on which rectangular area your player is currently residing in - check collision only against the tiles which are located within that area.
You may take it a step further - if you have more tiles in any given area than the threshold that you set - subdivide that area further to make more smaller areas within it.
The idea behind such subdivision is called Quadtree, and there is a huge quantity of papers and tutorials on the subject, you'll catch on very quickly.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
There are many solutions to this type of problem, but for what you're doing I believe the best course of action would be to use a tile engine. This would have been commonly used in similar games in the past (think any RPG on the SNES) and it provides you with a quick and easy means of both level/map design and collision detection.
The basic concept of a tile engine is that objects are stored in a 2D array and when your player (or any other moving game entity) attempts to move into a new tile you perform a simple check to see if the object in that tile is passable or not (for instance, if it's grass, the player may move; if it's a treasure chest, the player cannot move). This will greatly simplify checking for collisions (as a naive check of a list of entities will have O(n^2) performance). This picture might give you an idea of what I'm talking about. The lines have been added to illustrate a point, but of course when you're playing the game you don't actively think of everything as being composed of individual 32x32 pixel tiles.
While I don't personally have any experience with tile engines in Java, it looks like Mappy supports Java, and I've heard good things about PulpCore. You're more than welcome to create your own engine, of course, but you have to decide if your effort is better spent reinventing the wheel (but, of course, it will be your wheel then, and that is rather satisfying) or spend your time making a better game.
I am planning to develop a jigsaw puzzle game.
Now I already have images and image pieces, so we don't need algorithm to cut the image in pieces.
On the UI side there would be two sections
First section contains the broken images in random order.
Second section contains the outline of the full image. User need to drag and drop the the cut images onto the outline image.
I am not sure how can the pieces be matched on the the outline image?
Any idea about the algorithm or the starting pointers?
Allow the user to drag each piece into the outline area. Allow the piece to be rotated in 90 degree increments.
Option 1:
If a piece is in the correct location in the overall puzzle, and at the correct angle, AND connected to another piece, then snap it into place with some user feedback. The outside edge of the puzzle can count for a connection to edge pieces.
Option 2:
A neighbor is an adjacent puzzle piece when the puzzle is assembled. When the puzzle pieces are mixed up, they still have the same neighbors. Each puzzle piece (except the edge pieces) has four neighbors.
If a piece is near one of its neighbors at the correct angle relative to that neighbor, then snap it to the other piece. Then allow the two (or more) pieces to be dragged around as a unit, as is done with a single piece. This would allow the user to assemble subsections of the puzzle in any area, much like is done with a physical jigsaw puzzle, and connect the subsections with one another.
You can check the piece being moved to its four neighbors to see if they are close enough to snap together. If a piece has its proper edge close enough to the proper edge of its neighbor, at the same angle, then they match.
There are several ways to check relative locations. One way would be to temporarily rotate the coordinates of the piece you are testing so it is upright, then rotate the coordinates of all its desired neighbors, also temporarily, to the same angle. (Use the same center of rotation for all the rotations.) Then you can easily test to see if they are close enough to match. If the user is dragging a subassembly, then you will need to check each unmatched edge in the subassembly.
Option 2 is more complex and more realistic. Option 1 can be further simplified by omitting the rotation of pieces and making every piece the proper angle initally.
For a regular shapes you can go with a matrix. I recommend this as the first approach. Dividing the puzzle is as simple as defining X,Y dimensions of the matrix. For each piece you have a series of four values then, one for each side, saying whether it is flat, pointing out, or pointing in. This will give you a very classic jigsaw puzzle setup.
How the pieces actually look becomes a strict GUI thing. Now, for the first draft I recommend getting it working with perfectly square pieces. Taking rectangular bits of an image should be easy to do in any GUI framework.
To go to shaped pieces you'll need a series of templates. These will become masks that you apply to the image. Each mask clips out a tiny portion of the image to produce your piece. You'll probably need to dynamically create the masks in order to fit them to the puzzle. At first start with simply triangular connections. Once you have that working you can do the math to get nice bulbous connector shapes. Look up "clip" and "mask" in your GUI framework.
If you wish to do irregular polygon shapes that don't follow a general matrix layout, then you need to do a lot more work. This is why I recommend getting the square first working as a good example. Now you'll need to delve into graph theory and partitioning. Pick up some books on 3D programming -- focusing on algorithms, as they do partitioning all the time. Though I wouldn't doubt if there is a book with this exact topic in it.
Have fun.
the data structure is simple I guess- each peace will point to it's neighbors and will hold the actual shape to display.
on the MMI (UI) of the app - what is your developing environment ?
If it's windows - I would go with c# and winforms or even better wpf.
if it's unix, you'll have to get someone else's advise, as I'm not an expert there.
1) How to break image into random polygons
It seems that you have figured out this part. (from : "Now I already have images and image pieces, so we don't need algorithm to cut the image in pieces.")
2) what kind of data structure can solve the problem
You can create a Class Piece like Scribble class in this example and your pieces would be array of objects of Piece class.
So, you will have two arrays,
(i) actual image pieces array
(ii) image piece outline array
So, whenever you drag and drop one piece on to the full outline of image, it will check whether the image piece object is intersecting more than 80% and ID (member variable of Piece object) of actual image piece and image piece outline matches, then you got the right piece at right place...
3) UI implementation
Check this out.
You could make an array of objects of the class "PuzzleTile"
Every such tile has an image and an integer
After every move, check if the integers are sorted correctly, means:
123
456
789
You could make a function for that which returns a bool.
Note: I'm currently developing under C#, that's why it's probably easiest to realize especially this concept under C#, although other platforms need none up to barely some modification to this.