Java annotations are marked with a #Target annotation to declare possible joinpoints which can be decorated by that annotation. Values TYPE, FIELD, METHOD, etc. of the ElementType enum are clear and simply understandable.
Question
WHY to use #Target(ANNOTATION_TYPE) value? What are the annotated annotations good for? What is their contribution? Give me an explanation of an idea how it works and why I should use it. Some already existing and well-known example of its usage would be great too.
You can use an annotated annotation to create a meta-annotation, for example consider this usage of #Transactional in Spring:
/**
* Shortcut and more descriptive "alias" for {#code #Transactional(propagation = Propagation.MANDATORY)}.
*/
#Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.MANDATORY)
public #interface RequiresExistingTransaction {
}
When you enable Spring to process the #Transactional annotation, it will look for classes and methods that carry #Transactional or any meta-annotation of it (an annotation that is annotated with #Transactional).
Anyway this was just one concrete example how one can make use of an annotated annotation. I guess it's mostly frameworks like Spring where it makes sense to use them.
Each annotation annotated by #Target(ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE) is called Meta-annotation. That means, you can define your own custom annotations that are an amalgamation of many annotations combined into one annotation to create composed annotations.
A good example from Android world is StringDef
Denotes that the annotated String element, represents a logical type and that its value should be one of the explicitly named constants.
#Retention(SOURCE)
#StringDef({POWER_SERVICE, WINDOW_SERVICE, LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE})
public #interface ServicesName {}
public static final String POWER_SERVICE = "power";
public static final String WINDOW_SERVICE = "window";
public static final String LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE = "layout_inflater";
Code inspector will treat #ServicesName and #WeekDays in the same way as #StringDef.
As a result we can create as much named StringDef's as we need and override set of constants. #Target(ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE) it is a tool that allows to extend the use of annotations.
Annotation is defined like a ordinary Java interface, but with an '#' preceding the interface keyword (i.e., #interface ). Annotations are used to provide supplemental information about a program. On the other hand, an interface can be defined as a container that stores the signatures of the methods to be implemented in the code segment.
WHY to use #Target(ANNOTATION_TYPE) value?
When there is need to apply an annotation to an another annotation. If you look at the source codes of the common Java annotations, you see often this code pattern:
#Target(ANNOTATION_TYPE)
public #interface TheAnnotation
{
...
}
For example,
#Documented
#Target({ ANNOTATION_TYPE })
#Retention(RUNTIME)
public #interface Constraint {
public Class<? extends ConstraintValidator<?, ?>>[] validatedBy();
}
What are the annotated annotations good for?
They are good or more precisely necessary if they are used to annotate other annotations.
What is their contribution?
They make possible to apply an annotation directly to an another annotation, that is a different thing than applying an annotation to a standard Java class or to method and so on.
Give me an explanation of an idea how it works and why I should use it.
For example, if you create a data model class and you may want that the program checks data validity. In that case, there might be need to create a new annotation and apply another annotations to this annotation. It is simple to add some data validity checks to this model by adding annotations to the class. For example, to check that some value is not null (#notNull) or email is valid (#ValidEmail) or length of a field is more than x characters (#Size). However, it is possible that there is not built in Java annotations for all purposes. For example, it is so if you liked to check if password and its matchingPassword are same. This is possible by creating the annotation class PasswordMatches:
#Target({TYPE})
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Constraint(validatedBy = PasswordMatchesValidator.class)
#Documented
public #interface PasswordMatches {
String message() default "Passwords don't match";
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
}
Note, there is line
#Constraint(validatedBy = PasswordMatchesValidator.class).
In other words, the annotation class Constraint, like the other annotations in this class also, must have ANNOTATION_TYPE as a value of target annotation.
Now the password equality check is easy to include to data model class simply by adding annotation #PasswordMatches:
#PasswordMatches
public class UserDto {
...
}
The PasswordMatchesValidator class could look like this:
public class PasswordMatchesValidator implements ConstraintValidator<PasswordMatches, Object> {
#Override
public void initialize(final PasswordMatches constraintAnnotation) {}
#Override
public boolean isValid(final Object obj, final ConstraintValidatorContext context) {
final UserDto user = (UserDto) obj;
return user.getPassword().equals(user.getMatchingPassword());
}
}
Some already existing and well-known example of its usage would be great too.
There is quite well-known example in item 4, but another known annotations which are applied frequently to custom annotations are #Retention, #Documented and #Target itself.
For example, if annotation looks like
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface SomeAnnotation {
String description() default "This is example for class annotation";
}
the compiler will complain in this situation
#SomeAnnotation
public class SomeClass {
#SomeAnnotation // here it's complaning
public void someMethod(){}
}
If you change
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
to
#Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
it won't complain anymore.
Annotation are basically additional metadata (information) that goes along with your code. It can be placed along side types (Classes, Interfaces), methods, and arguments.
It is often useful during compile time and runtime. Many popular APIs such as Java EE 5+, Spring, AspectJ leverage annotation for code clarity and consistency.
Using annotation often allows code to be more readable, more easily understood.
I'd recommend you read through the annotation chapter on Java tutorial
In the past metadata are often given as an xml file, and it's difficult for someone trying to understand the code if they have to lookup a different xml configuration file. The latest Java servlet API allows mapping of servlet simply by using annotation -- as opposed of web.xml mapping:
#WebServlet("/response")
public class ResponseServlet extends HttpServlet {
// servlet code here...
}
Related
Using spring boot 2 on java 11, I want to make a custom annotation for each REST API version (eg: "/api/v1/") that can be joined with subsequent URI components as below:
#APIv1("/users/") // this annotation should prepend "/api/v1/{argument}"
public class UserController {
#GetMapping("/info")
public String info() {return "This should be returned at /api/v1/users/info/";}
/* More methods with mappings */
}
The problem is I don't know how to define that #APIv1 annotation.
From what I've searched, I referenced https://stackoverflow.com/a/51182494/ to write the following:
#Target({ElementType.TYPE})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/api/v1")
#interface APIv1 {
#AliasFor(annotation = RestController.class)
String value() default "";
}
But this cannot handle arguments. Doing the same as above will route to /api/v1/info/ whether the argument is given or not. It's better than nothing since I can switch the method annotation to #GetMapping("/users/info"), but I was wondering if there was a way to combine the constant with an argument to reduce repetition across method annotations within the same controller class.
In #APIv1 you defined:
#RequestMapping("/api/v1")
So it is working as you told it to.
Situation: you have module with DTO objects used in your API, so that other project(s) can reuse then when sending requests. These DTO classes does have bean-validation annotations in them. And you would like to use your custom validations to validate DTO "arriving" via requests. The sender typically does not validate outgoing data, IIUC, and might not be interested in importing validators along with annotations.
Problem(?): bean-validation is defined in a way, where annotation defines who implements it (which is incorrect and it should be otherwise around imo), with possibility to specify empty array as annotation validator (seems like hack) and then pairing is done via manual hashmap manipulations instead of stuff like service loader etc.
How do you do this?
Would you split annotation and it's validator in separate modules?
How would you bind them together? I think it should be possible to use {} as validator and then use org.hibernate.validator.internal.metadata.core.ConstraintHelper#putValidatorDescriptors to bind them together, but I did not test it yet + maybe there is better way...
I agree that the annotation defining the validator does feel backwards. While not ideal, I've been able to work around this by separating my custom ConstraintValidator into an interface and implementation.
Example:
In api module define constraint and interface validator
#Constraint(validatedBy = MyConstraintValidator.class)
public #interface MyConstraint
{
}
public interface MyConstraintValidator
extends ConstraintValidator<MyConstraint, String>
{
}
In your service module define the implementation
public class MyConstraintValidatorImpl implements MyConstraintValidator
{
private FooService foo;
#Override
public boolean isValid( String value, ConstraintValidatorContext ctx)
{
// Implement your constraint logic
}
}
I we need to separate interface class and validator implementation into separate modules, it's possible. And even in a way, which I said in original question, that should be used. In API module you declare validation for example as:
#Target({ METHOD, FIELD, ANNOTATION_TYPE, CONSTRUCTOR, PARAMETER, TYPE_USE})
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Documented
#Constraint(validatedBy = {})
#SupportedValidationTarget(ValidationTarget.ANNOTATED_ELEMENT)
#ReportAsSingleViolation
public #interface AnyUuid {
//...
notice validatedBy = {}. The validator implementation looks like:
public class AnyUuidValidator implements ConstraintValidator<AnyUuid, Object> {
//...
and pairing can be setup using service loader(see javadoc if you don't know how that works). Put into file META-INF/services/javax.validation.ConstraintValidator FQDN of AnyUuidValidator shown above. And all other custom validators. And that should be it.
There is a bug I found with this. If I'm not mistaken. If you have DTO you cannot change (~annotate with constraints) and still want to validate them via bean validation, you can register validation definitions via xml file. If you are doing so and use service loader for pairing definition and implementation of custom validators, there is probably some bug and your custom validators won't be found. So verify this scenario before relying on service loader. But maybe I'm wrong, for me it was feasible to drop this validation trivially so I did to save some time and could ignore this.
I have two annotations from a framework. Often I use those two annotations both on the same field. Thus I'm trying to create a "combined" annotation that contains that both two.
But I don't know if it is possible at all:
The existing annotations (that I have no control of):
#Target({ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.FIELD})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface ApiParam {
String name() default "";
}
#Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.FIELD})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface ApiModelProperty {
String name() default "";
}
My Custom annotation that I'm trying to create:
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target(ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE)
#ApiParam
#ApiModelProperty
public #interface SwaggerParam {
String name() default "";
}
Result: the annotations are not applicable to annotation type.
Question: Is there any chance?
Unfortunately you can't do this since it is not possible to extend annotations.
Is there something like Annotation Inheritance in java?
When I first answered this I was initially confused by the Spring framework approach to this shortcoming whereby they use meta level annotations (such as #Component as a meta annotation for #Controller/#Configuration etc.) as a sort of workaround.
See: https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/3.2.x/spring-framework-reference/html/beans.html#beans-annotation-config
Composing annotations like you did can only be done if your framework supports scanning for meta-annotations. Thus the framework not only has to scan for direct annotations but also for an annotation's meta-annotations recursively.
Multiple frameworks support this, some of which are:
junit: https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#writing-tests-meta-annotations
Spring: https://www.logicbig.com/tutorials/spring-framework/spring-web-mvc/meta-annotation.html
Swagger: https://stackoverflow.com/a/53266819/1235217
I would like to use Lombok's #NonNull annotation to generate the null-checking code automatically for method parameters while also using FindBugs' #NonNull to use static analysis tools and generate appropriate warnings whenver the case applies.
As of now, I need to do the following:
public void doSomething (#lombok.NonNull #edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.NonNull Object parameter)
{
// Do something
}
This is quite ugly, so I would like to avoid using this syntax. I read about nested annotations (here and here), but I can't seem to find a way to create my own custom annotation with both NonNull annotations as nested annotations. Am I trying to do something that cannot work?
Here's my latest attempt:
#Documented
#Retention (RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
#Target (value={ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.LOCAL_VARIABLE})
public #interface MyNonNull
{
public lombok.NonNull lombokNonNull () default #lombok.NonNull;
public edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.NonNull findBugsNonNull () default #edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.NonNull;
}
You cannot "merge" annotations with custom annotations, however you can use #ParametersAreNonnullByDefault on the class scope, which should allow edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.NonNull to be inferred.
I think neither of your links will help you. You would need to extend from both with your custom annotation, yet you cannot even extend from one, as all annotations have an implicit extends clause for Annotation.
I have one interface on the legacy project which defines as follows:
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD})
public #interface Statistic {
String name();
}
.So here #interface are followed with two annotations i.e.(#Retention & #Target).
Is anybody can explain how this interface works and what would be the good place to use it.
I am quite new with these one.
Moreover, I can see on the project code somewhere using this interface with annotating like below:
#Statistic(name="DDB/received") private int docReceived = 0;
What does this really meant? Can anybody elaborate clearly? Thanks
Check this..
Basic Annotation tutorial , Custom Annotations , Why annotations , When and Where
and finally
Java Doc
This interface defines an annotation that is retained for use at runtime. This would allow you to test whether a field or method was marked with it to perform some action upon it. The annotation can also have metadata associated with it for use by the processor. In this case, you can provide a name.
The below illustrates two cases where this annotation can be used:
ElementType.FIELD
#Statistic(name = "Test 1")
public String test;
ElementType.METHOD
#Statistic(name = "Test 2")
public List<Stuff> findAll() {
return findAll("order by added desc");
}