I want to remove parenthesis using Java regular expression but I faced to error No group 1 please see my code and help me.
public String find_parenthesis(String Expr){
String s;
String ss;
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("\\(.+?\\)");
Matcher m = p.matcher(Expr);
if(m.find()){
s = m.group(1);
ss = "("+s+")";
Expr = Expr.replaceAll(ss, s);
return find_parenthesis(Expr);
}
else
return Expr;
}
and it is my main:
public static void main(String args[]){
Calculator c1 = new Calculator();
String s = "(4+5)+6";
System.out.println(s);
s = c1.find_parenthesis(s);
System.out.println(s);
}
The simplest method is to just remove all parentheses from the string, regardless of whether they are balanced or not.
String replaced = "(4+5)+6".replaceAll("[()]", "");
Correctly handling the balancing requires parsing (or truly ugly REs that only match to a limited depth, or “cleverness” with repeated regular expression substitutions). For most cases, such complexity is overkill; the simplest thing that could possibly work is good enough.
What you want is this: s = s.replaceAll("[()]","");
For more on regex, visit regex tutorial.
You're getting the error because your regex doesn't have any groups, but I suggest you use this much simpler, one-line approach:
expr = expr.replaceAll("\\((.+?)\\)", "$1");
You can't do this with a regex at all. It won't remove the matching parentheses, just the first left and the first right, and then you won't be able to get the correct result from the expression. You need a parser for expressions. Have a look around for recursive descent ezpresssion parsers, the Dijkstra shunting-yard algorithm, etc.
The regular expression defines a character class consisting of any whitespace character (\s, which is escaped as \s because we're passing in a String), a dash (escaped because a dash means something special in the context of character classes), and parentheses. Try it working code.
phoneNumber.replaceAll("[\\s\\-()]", "");
I know I'm very late here. But, just in case you're still looking for a better answer. If you want to remove both open and close parenthesis from a string, you can use a very simple method like this:
String s = "(4+5)+6";
s=s.replaceAll("\\(", "").replaceAll("\\)","");
If you are using this:
s=s.replaceAll("()", "");
you are instructing the code to look for () which is not present in your string. Instead you should try to remove the parenthesis separately.
To explain in detail, consider the below code:
String s = "(4+5)+6";
String s1=s.replaceAll("\\(", "").replaceAll("\\)","");
System.out.println(s1);
String s2 = s.replaceAll("()", "");
System.out.println(s2);
The output for this code will be:
4+5+6
(4+5)+6
Also, use replaceAll only if you are in need of a regex. In other cases, replace works just fine. See below:
String s = "(4+5)+6";
String s1=s.replace("(", "").replace(")","");
Output:
4+5+6
Hope this helps!
Related
Hello Im having trouble getting the third element of a string (F604080)
<sourceDocumentId>AX02_APF604_F604080</sourceDocumentId>
I have tried with this regular expression and variations, but i can manage to get
F604080.
(?<=\w+_)\w+(?=\<)
(?<=\w+_\w+_)\w+(?=\<)
....
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks.
You don't need look behind or look ahead, instead just use this simple regex,
.*_(\w+)
and capture group 1.
Java codes,
public static void main(String[] args) {
String s = "<sourceDocumentId>AX02_APF604_F604080</sourceDocumentId>";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile(".*_(\\w+)");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find()) {
System.out.println(m.group(1));
} else {
System.out.println("Didn't match");
}
}
Prints this like you wanted.
F604080
Using regex you can use something like >\w+_\w+_(\w+)<\/
String str = "<sourceDocumentId>AX02_APF604_F604080</sourceDocumentId>";
String code = null;
Matcher m = Pattern.compile(">\\w+_\\w+_(\\w+)</").matcher(str);
if (m.find()) {
code = m.group(1);
}
Simply use substring() operation
String code = str.substring(str.lastIndexOf('_') + 1, str.lastIndexOf('<'));
If later you parse XML with more element, you may use something like Java DOM Parser XML, but here this is not the best option as you have only one element
Can you just parse the string using "_" as separator and take the 3rd element ?
Both of your regular expressions seems to be matching the given string.
Anyway you could be a little bit more specific with this one:
^(?:<\w+>)(?:\w+)_(?:\w+)_(\w+)(?:<\/\w+>)$
Be sure that the input is the string you think it is and no additional text is given after that.
I am trying to write regular expression in Java to evaluate two strings mentioned with () separated by ,
Example: (test1,test2)
I have written below code
public static void main(String[] a){
String pattern = "\\([a-zA-Z0-9]+,[a-zA-Z0-9]+.\\)";
String test = "(test1,test2)";
System.out.println(test.matches(pattern));
}
It works as expected and prints true in below cases
String test = "(test1,test2)";
String test = "(t,test2)";
But it is printing false when I send below
String test = "(test1,t)";
It is strange because I am using same expression before and after ,
It returns true for (t,test2) but not for (test1,t)
Please let me know what am I missing in this regular expression. I need it to evaluate and return true for (test1,t)
There's no need for the . (that matches one character) in your regex. Remove . from your regex so it becomes "\\([a-zA-Z0-9]+,[a-zA-Z0-9]+\\)" and it should work.
Use this regex:
String pattern = "^\\(.+,.+\\)";
This will match your required strings.
In the second part of your pattern, you have "[a-zA-Z0-9]+."
If you're trying to match "t", it will see t for the [a-zA-Z0-9]+ part, but it requires another character after that to match the . part.
Revised pattern: "\\([a-zA-Z0-9]+,[a-zA-Z0-9]+\\)"
Delete the dot after the second group[a-zA-Z0-9]
Demo
and even simpler you can use \w for words, you can use instead of [a-zA-Z0-9]
so your regular expression would be like that
\(\w+,\w+\)
In your regular expression '.' is not needed in the latter part.
change is as "\([a-zA-Z0-9]+,[a-zA-Z0-9]+\)" so that it will be returning true for "(test,t)"
String pattern = "\\([a-zA-Z0-9]+,[a-zA-Z0-9]+\\)";
String test = "(te,t)";
System.out.println(test.matches(pattern)); // true
String pattern = "\\([a-zA-Z0-9]+,[a-zA-Z0-9]+\\)";
String test = "(test1,test2)";
String t1 = "(t,test2)";
String t2="(test2,t)";
System.out.println(test.matches(pattern));
System.out.println(t1.matches(pattern));
System.out.println(t2.matches(pattern));
just try this code, it will give you answer you want.
You have written "." at the end after + in your pattern so clear it.
This code works fine :
final String result = myString.replaceAll("<tag1>", "{").replaceAll("<tag2>", "}");
but I have to parse big files, so I'm asking me if I can have a Pattern.compile("REGEX"); before the while :
Patter p = Pattern.compile("REGEX");
while(scan.hasNextLine()){
final String myWorkLine = scan.readLine();
p.matcher(s).replaceAll("$1"); // or other value
..;
}
I expect faster result because regex compilation is maid once and only once.
EDIT
I want to put (if it is possible) the replaceAll(..).replaceAll(..) model in a Pattern, and have tag1==>{, and tag2==>}.
Question : is outside loop Pattern model faster than inside loop replaceAll.replaceAll model?
To answer your original question: yes, you could do that, and indeed it would be faster than your original code, if you apply the same regular expression(s) multiple times in a loop. Your loop should be rewritten like this:
Pattern p1 = Pattern.compile("REGEX1");
Pattern p1 = Pattern.compile("REGEX1");
while (scan.hasNextLine()) {
String myWorkLine = scan.readLine();
myWorkLine = p1.matcher(myWorkLine).replaceAll("replacement1");
myWorkLine = p2.matcher(myWorkLine).replaceAll("replacement2");
...;
}
But, if your're not using regular expressions, as your first example suggests ("<tag1>"), then don't use String.replaceAll(String regex, String replacement), as it is slower because of the regular expression. Instead use String.replace(CharSequence target, CharSequence replacement), as it doesn't work with regular expression and is much faster.
Example:
"ABAP is fun! ABAP ABAP ABAP".replace("ABAP", "Java");
See: Java Docs for String.replace
It's not nice changing your question that radically, but ok, here again an answer for your regular expression:
String s1
= "You can <bold>have nice weather</bold>, but <bold>not</bold> always!";
//EDIT: the regex was 'overengineered', and .?? should have been .*?
//String s2 = s1.replaceAll("(.*?)<bold>(.*?)</bold>(.??)", "$1{$2}$3");
String s2 = s1.replaceAll("<bold>(.*?)</bold>", "{$1}");
System.out.println(s2);
Output: You can {have nice weather}, but {not} always!
Here the loop with this new regex, and yes, this would be faster than original loop:
//EDIT: the regex was 'overengineered'
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("<bold>(.*?)</bold>");
while (scan.hasNextLine()) {
String myWorkLine = scan.readLine();
myWorkLine = p.matcher(myWorkLine).replaceAll("{$1}");
...;
}
EDIT:
Here the description of Java RegEx syntax constructs
replaceAll uses regex Patterns. From the java.lang.String source code:
public String replaceAll(String regex, String replacement) {
return Pattern.compile(regex).matcher(this).replaceAll(replacement);
}
Edit1: Please stop changing what you're asking. Pick a question and stick with it.
Edit2:
If you're really sure you want to do it this way, compiling a regex outside of the loop, in the simplest case you'd need two different patterns:
Pattern tag1Pattern = Pattern.compile("<tag1>");
Pattern tag2Pattern = Pattern.compile("<tag2>");
while( scan.hasNextLine() ) {
String line = scan.readLine();
String modifiedLine = tag1Pattern.matcher(line).replaceAll("{");
modifiedLine = tag2Pattern.matcher(line).replaceAll("}");
...
}
You're still applying the pattern matcher twice per line, so if there's any performance hits that's why.
Without knowing what your data looks like, it's hard to give you a more precise answer or better regex. Unless you've edited your question (again) while I was writing this.
I'm trying to replace the last dot in a String using a regular expression.
Let's say I have the following String:
String string = "hello.world.how.are.you!";
I want to replace the last dot with an exclamation mark such that the result is:
"hello.world.how.are!you!"
I have tried various expressions using the method String.replaceAll(String, String) without any luck.
One way would be:
string = string.replaceAll("^(.*)\\.(.*)$","$1!$2");
Alternatively you can use negative lookahead as:
string = string.replaceAll("\\.(?!.*\\.)","!");
Regex in Action
Although you can use a regex, it's sometimes best to step back and just do it the old-fashioned way. I've always been of the belief that, if you can't think of a regex to do it in about two minutes, it's probably not suited to a regex solution.
No doubt get some wonderful regex answers here. Some of them may even be readable :-)
You can use lastIndexOf to get the last occurrence and substring to build a new string: This complete program shows how:
public class testprog {
public static String morph (String s) {
int pos = s.lastIndexOf(".");
if (pos >= 0)
return s.substring(0,pos) + "!" + s.substring(pos+1);
return s;
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
System.out.println (morph("hello.world.how.are.you!"));
System.out.println (morph("no dots in here"));
System.out.println (morph(". first"));
System.out.println (morph("last ."));
}
}
The output is:
hello.world.how.are!you!
no dots in here
! first
last !
The regex you need is \\.(?=[^.]*$). the ?= is a lookahead assertion
"hello.world.how.are.you!".replace("\\.(?=[^.]*$)", "!")
Try this:
string = string.replaceAll("[.]$", "");
I am trying to create a regular expression for the replaceAll method in Java. The test string is abXYabcXYZ and the pattern is abc. I want to replace any symbol except the pattern with +. For example the string abXYabcXYZ and pattern [^(abc)] should return ++++abc+++, but in my case it returns ab++abc+++.
public static String plusOut(String str, String pattern) {
pattern= "[^("+pattern+")]" + "".toLowerCase();
return str.toLowerCase().replaceAll(pattern, "+");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
String text = "abXYabcXYZ";
String pattern = "abc";
System.out.println(plusOut(text, pattern));
}
When I try to replace the pattern with + there is no problem - abXYabcXYZ with pattern (abc) returns abxy+xyz. Pattern (^(abc)) returns the string without replacement.
Is there any other way to write NOT(regex) or group symbols as a word?
What you are trying to achieve is pretty tough with regular expressions, since there is no way to express “replace strings not matching a pattern”. You will have to use a “positive” pattern, telling what to match instead of what not to match.
Furthermore, you want to replace every character with a replacement character, so you have to make sure that your pattern matches exactly one character. Otherwise, you will replace whole strings with a single character, returning a shorter string.
For your toy example, you can use negative lookaheads and lookbehinds to achieve the task, but this may be more difficult for real-world examples with longer or more complex strings, since you will have to consider each character of your string separately, along with its context.
Here is the pattern for “not ‘abc’”:
[^abc]|a(?!bc)|(?<!a)b|b(?!c)|(?<!ab)c
It consists of five sub-patterns, connected with “or” (|), each matching exactly one character:
[^abc] matches every character except a, b or c
a(?!bc) matches a if it is not followed by bc
(?<!a)b matches b if it is not preceded with a
b(?!c) matches b if it is not followed by c
(?<!ab)c matches c if it is not preceded with ab
The idea is to match every character that is not in your target word abc, plus every word character that, according to the context, is not part of your word. The context can be examined using negative lookaheads (?!...) and lookbehinds (?<!...).
You can imagine that this technique will fail once you have a target word containing one character more than once, like example. It is pretty hard to express “match e if it is not followed by x and not preceded by l”.
Especially for dynamic patterns, it is by far easier to do a positive search and then replace every character that did not match in a second pass, as others have suggested here.
[^ ... ] will match one character that is not any of ...
So your pattern "[^(abc)]" is saying "match one character that is not a, b, c or the left or right bracket"; and indeed that is what happens in your test.
It is hard to say "replace all characters that are not part of the string 'abc'" in a single trivial regular expression. What you might do instead to achieve what you want could be some nasty thing like
while the input string still contains "abc"
find the next occurrence of "abc"
append to the output a string containing as many "+"s as there are characters before the "abc"
append "abc" to the output string
skip, in the input string, to a position just after the "abc" found
append to the output a string containing as many "+"s as there are characters left in the input
or possibly if the input alphabet is restricted you could use regular expressions to do something like
replace all occurrences of "abc" with a single character that does not occur anywhere in the existing string
replace all other characters with "+"
replace all occurrences of the target character with "abc"
which will be more readable but may not perform as well
Negating regexps is usually troublesome. I think you might want to use negative lookahead. Something like this might work:
String pattern = "(?<!ab).(?!abc)";
I didn't test it, so it may not really work for degenerate cases. And the performance might be horrible too. It is probably better to use a multistep algorithm.
Edit: No I think this won't work for every case. You will probably spend more time debugging a regexp like this than doing it algorithmically with some extra code.
Try to solve it without regular expressions:
String out = "";
int i;
for(i=0; i<text.length() - pattern.length() + 1; ) {
if (text.substring(i, i + pattern.length()).equals(pattern)) {
out += pattern;
i += pattern.length();
}
else {
out += "+";
i++;
}
}
for(; i<text.length(); i++) {
out += "+";
}
Rather than a single replaceAll, you could always try something like:
#Test
public void testString() {
final String in = "abXYabcXYabcHIH";
final String expected = "xxxxabcxxabcxxx";
String result = replaceUnwanted(in);
assertEquals(expected, result);
}
private String replaceUnwanted(final String in) {
final Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(.*?)(abc)([^a]*)");
final Matcher m = p.matcher(in);
final StringBuilder out = new StringBuilder();
while (m.find()) {
out.append(m.group(1).replaceAll(".", "x"));
out.append(m.group(2));
out.append(m.group(3).replaceAll(".", "x"));
}
return out.toString();
}
Instead of using replaceAll(...), I'd go for a Pattern/Matcher approach:
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
public class Main {
public static String plusOut(String str, String pattern) {
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
String regex = String.format("((?:(?!%s).)++)|%s", pattern, pattern);
Matcher m = Pattern.compile(regex).matcher(str.toLowerCase());
while(m.find()) {
builder.append(m.group(1) == null ? pattern : m.group().replaceAll(".", "+"));
}
return builder.toString();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
String text = "abXYabcXYZ";
String pattern = "abc";
System.out.println(plusOut(text, pattern));
}
}
Note that you'll need to use Pattern.quote(...) if your String pattern contains regex meta-characters.
Edit: I didn't see a Pattern/Matcher approach was already suggested by toolkit (although slightly different)...