I'm trying to use numel (function available in Matlab) in java.
Are they any implementations of this function available in java?
I am not sure if this is how you want numel to work but here you have few versions:
version1 - for arrays with irregular size like {{1},{2,3}}
this method will iterate over all elements of array counting them.
public static int numel(Object array) {
if (array == null)
return 1;// I will count nulls as elements since new String[10] is
// initialized with nulls
int total = 1;
if (array.getClass().isArray()) {
total = 0;
int length = java.lang.reflect.Array.getLength(array);
for (int index = 0; index < length; index++) {
total += numel(java.lang.reflect.Array.get(array, index));
}
}
return total;
}
version2 - for arrays with regular size like new String[2][3][4]
this method will only use size of first rows of different levels in array to get it size assuming that rows at same level have same size
public static int regularNumel(Object array) {
if (array == null)
return 1;
int total = 1;
if (array.getClass().isArray()) {
int length = java.lang.reflect.Array.getLength(array);
if (length > 0) {
Object row = java.lang.reflect.Array.get(array, 0);
if (row == null || !row.getClass().isArray())
return length;
else //now we know that row is also array
return length * regularNumel(row);
} else
return 0;
}
return total;
}
class main{
public static void main (String[] args){
// numel returns the number of array elements, as does .length in Java.
int[] testArr = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8};
System.out.println(testArr.length);
}
}
// Result: 8
I managed to solve this problem.
How I wish the size of an image, I made a small function that solved my problem.
public static int length(BufferedImage bi)
{
int x;
x=bi.getHeight()*bi.getWidth();
return x;
}
The numel function of matlab
n = numel(A) returns the the number of elements, n, in array A.
You Can make yours like
int arraycount(int a[])
{
int counter;
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
counter++;
}
return counter;
}
Related
The problem is there is an array of 10000 that is already filled for me. The range of numbers that will fill the array will be between 0 and 2500. The array is unsorted. My goal is to find the existence of 1320 through one linear search, and the second linear search will check how many times the number 1320 appears. The array is a random array.
I have tried setting up a linear search that will check whether the number in the array exists. I have also tried to set up the linear search that will check how many times an array exists. Neither worked, this is my first time working with arrays so I am not sure if I am even doing them correctly
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Finish adding Code
boolean DoesItExist;
int iHowMany;
final int SIZE = 10000, ENTRY = 1320;
int[] NumArray = new int[SIZE];
OwenHeading.getHeader("Assignment 9: Arrays.");
fillTheArray(NumArray, SIZE);
System.out.println("DONE");
}
public static void fillTheArray(int[] iTempArray, int SIZE) {
final int RANGE = 2500;
Random rand = new Random();
for (int index = 0; index <= SIZE - 1; index++)
iTempArray[index] = rand.nextInt(RANGE);
}
public static boolean linearSearchOne(int[] iTempArray, int SIZE, int ENTRY) {
boolean TempDoesItExist;
return TempDoesItExist;
}
public static int linearSearchTwo(int[] iTempArray, int SIZE, int ENTRY) {
int HowManyExist;
return HowManyExist;
}
public static void programOutput(boolean TempDoesItExist, int TempHowMany) {
if (TempDoesItExist)
System.out.println("does");
// Cool, you found the number 1320
else
System.out.println("does not");
// Dang, you didn't find the number 1320
}
}
I am not asking for the exact answer, just some help that will get me going into the right direction. I feel like I would be able to do this project easier if I started from scratch, but my teacher wants us to use his starter project.
Initialize your boolean and counter
Bool doesItExist = false;
Int iHowManyTimes = 0;
You can check for values in arrays in java in a linear fashion like this:
for (int number : NumArray) {
if (anItemInArray == myValue) {
doesItExist = true;
return;
}
}
afterwards do it all over again and increment your counter
for (int number : NumArray) {
if (number == ENTRY) {
iHowMany += 1;
}
}
Edit: Return statement added to first loop, as there is no reason to continue after the value is found
you can modify two methods of linear search you have in this way and that is going to work :
just declare a counter and increment it each time you find your ENTRY number.
public static boolean linearSearchOne(int[] iTempArray, int SIZE, int ENTRY) {
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) {
if (iTempArray[i] == ENTRY) {
return true;
}
}
return false
}
public static int linearSearchTwo(int[] iTempArray, int SIZE, int ENTRY) {
int HowManyExist;
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) {
if (iTempArray[i] == ENTRY) {
HowManyExist ++;
}
}
return HowManyExist;
}
It looks like you didn't call the linear search methods. For a linear search you can just do something like the following:
found=false;
howManyCounter=0;
for (int x=0, x<array.length; x++){
if (array[x]==numberYouWant){
found=true;
howManyCounter++;
}
}
I'm trying to create a third sorted array, c, from the two previously created arrays, a and b; however, I'm getting several errors within the merge method that say "The type of the expression must be an array type but it resolved to OrdArray". I've been at it for hours already, and feel like my brain is mush now. Can someone help me out?
class OrdArray
{
private long[] a; // ref to array a
private int nElems; // number of data items
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public OrdArray(int max) // constructor
{
a = new long[max]; // create array a
nElems = 0;
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public int size()
{ return nElems; }
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public int find(long searchKey)
{
int lowerBound = 0;
int upperBound = nElems-1;
int curIn;
while (true)
{
curIn = (lowerBound + upperBound ) / 2;
if (a[curIn] == searchKey)
return curIn; // found it
else if (lowerBound > upperBound)
return nElems; // can't find it
else // divide range
{
if (a[curIn] < searchKey)
lowerBound = curIn + 1; // it's in upper half
else
upperBound = curIn - 1; // it's in lower half
} // end else divide range
} // end while
} // end find()
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public void insert(long value) // put element into array
{
int j;
for (j = 0; j < nElems; j++) // find where it goes
if (a[j] > value) // (linear search)
break;
for (int k = nElems; k > j; k--) // move bigger ones up
a[k] = a[k-1];
a[j] = value; // insert it
nElems++; // increment size
} // end insert()
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public boolean delete(long value)
{
int j = find(value);
if (j == nElems) // can't find it
return false;
else // found it
{
for (int k = j; k < nElems; k++) // move bigger ones down
a[k] = a[k+1];
nElems--; // decrement size
return true;
}
} // end delete()
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public void display() // displays array contents
{
for (int j = 0; j < nElems; j++) // for each element,
System.out.print(a[j] + " "); // display it
System.out.println("");
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------
public static long[] merge(OrdArray a, OrdArray b)
{
long[] c = new long[a.nElems + b.nElems];
int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0;
while (i < a.nElems && j < b.nElems)
{
if (a.data[i] < b.data[j])
c[k++] = a.data[i++];
else
c[k++] = b.data[j++];
}
while (i < a.nElems)
c[k++] = a.data[i++];
while (j < b.nElems)
c[k++] = b.data[j++];
return c;
}
} // end class OrdArray
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
class OrderedApp
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int maxSize = 100; // array size
OrdArray a, b, c; // reference to array
a = new OrdArray(maxSize); // create the array
b = new OrdArray(maxSize);
c = new OrdArray(maxSize);
a.insert(11);
a.insert(13);
a.insert(15);
a.insert(17);
a.insert(19);
a.insert(21);
a.insert(23);
a.insert(25);
a.insert(27);
a.insert(29);
b.insert(12);
b.insert(14);
b.insert(16);
b.insert(18);
b.insert(20);
b.insert(32);
b.insert(24);
b.insert(26);
b.insert(28);
b.insert(30);
OrdArray.merge(a,b);
System.out.print("Array a: ");
a.display();
System.out.println();
System.out.print("Array b: ");
b.display();
System.out.println();
System.out.print("Array c: ");
c.display();
System.out.println();
} // end main()
}// end class OrderedApp
OrdArray is not an array type (despite the name); therefore, you can't index it like an array. This expression
a[i++]
where a is an OrdArray, will have no meaning. Java doesn't give you a way to define your own [] operator for classes (unlike C++). Therefore, you'll have to add a method to OrdArray to return the element at a given index, something like
public long get(int index) { ...write the code... }
a.get(i++) // will then get the element at that index
Although I'm not sure this is what you want, since you've declared c to be an int[] and the array in OrdArray to be a long[], so I'm not sure what you're trying to do.
EDIT: After reading your comment, I realized that the merge method is inside the OrdArray class. I missed that before. Since that's the case, you don't need to add a get method; you can access the private fields of your OrdArray parameters directly. In your method:
public void merge(OrdArray a, OrdArray b)
you want to get at the private array a that you declare for each OrdArray. If you just use a, the variable will refer to the OrdArray, which isn't an array (as described above); to get at the long[] a belonging to the OrdArray a, you need to say
a.a[i++]
and likewise, for b,
b.a[i++]
This can look confusing to a reader, so I suggest coming up with a better name so that you're not calling two things a. Perhaps data?
A couple other things: You use merge like this: c.merge(a,b), which means that merge is an instance method and c is the instance you're operating on. But your method doesn't do anything with the current instance. (The c you declare in merge is a local variable that has nothing to do with the c you use when calling merge.) Right now, your method is going to a lot of trouble to construct the local array c, but then it just throws it away. You either need to (1) fix the method so that it sets up the a (or data) array in the current instance; or (2) make it a static method and make the method return the new array as a function result. I'm not sure which one your instructor wants you to do.
I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to do. But to resolve error, i have corrected the articular block.
To note, OrdArray class is not an array. It's a class that has a long[] a. So you need to get the array like any other property from the object.
For betterment, please change the method signature like this:
public void merge(OrdArray ordArr1, OrdArray ordArr2) {//Note parameters' name change
.
.
.
while (i < ordArr1.nElems && j < ordArr2.nElems)
{
if (ordArr1.a[i] < ordArr2.a[j]) //should resolve
c[k++] = ordArr1.a[i++];
else
c[k++] = ordArr2.a[j++];
}
while (i < a.nElems)
c[k++] = ordArr1.a[i++];
while (j < b.nElems)
c[k++] = ordArr2.a[j++];
}
If you accept solution wit Lists it would be:
List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(sourceArray));
result.addAll(Arrays.asList(secondSourceArray));
Collections.sort(result);
You can optionally convert it back to array with
result.toArray();
I am confused why you are using binary search. Simple way is to insert two arrays using two insert methods or one. Using a merge method, just merge those two already sorted arrays by comparing the least element among two sorted arrays.
Remove delete, search etc methods, they are not required.
This is my code. I have inserted two integer arrays(elements) into inserta() and insertb() sorted them and merged them using insert() method. Finally I have this sorted array after merging them. Please see my code here:
package sample;
/**
*
* #author Shivasai
*/
public class Merge {
int i;
int j;
int k;
int n;
int m;
int p;
private long[] a;
private long[] b;
private long[] c;
public Merge()
{
a=new long[10];
b=new long[10];
c=new long[100];
n=0;
m=0;
p=0;
}
void inserta(long key)
{
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
if(a[i]>key)
break;
}
for(j=n;j>i;j--)
{
a[j]=a[j-1];
}
a[j]=key;
n++;
}
void insertb(long value)
{
for(i=0;i<m;i++)
{
if(b[i]>value)
break;
}
for(j=m;j>i;j--)
{
b[j]=b[j-1];
}
b[j]=value;
m++;
}
void insert()
{
i=0;
j=0;
while(i>n || j<m)
{
if(a[j]<b[i])
{
c[p]=a[j];
j++;
p++;
}
else
{
c[p]=b[i];
i++;
p++;
}
}
}
void displaya()
{
for(k=0;k<10;k++)
{
System.out.print("," +a[k]);
}
System.out.println();
}
void displayb()
{
for(k=0;k<10;k++)
{
System.out.print("," +b[k]);
}
System.out.println();
}
void displayc()
{
for(k=0;k<20;k++)
{
System.out.print("," +c[k]);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Merge obj = new Merge();
obj.inserta(25);
obj.inserta(12);
obj.inserta(1800);
obj.inserta(9);
obj.inserta(10);
obj.inserta(15);
obj.inserta(18);
obj.inserta(19);
obj.inserta(0);
obj.inserta(1500);
obj.insertb(36);
obj.displaya();
obj.insertb(2);
obj.insertb(3);
obj.insertb(2000);
obj.insertb(5);
obj.insertb(6);
obj.insertb(7);
obj.insertb(8);
obj.insertb(21);
obj.insertb(85);
obj.displayb();
obj.insert();
obj.displayc();
}
}
I have a 2d grid of integers.
grid[][];
Suppose I am given an element randomly from the 2d array. My aim is to return its adjacent grid elements.
For that I am creating an ArrayList
ArrayList<int[][]> adjacentSidesList = new ArrayList<int[][]>();
I would have to go for quite a few number of cases and in each case the number of the adjacentSides would be different. So my choice of data structure is an ArrayList
But when I would add an element to the list
adjacentSidesList.add(grid[row][column+1]);
I understand this is wrong because I am adding the value of the grid element to the ArrayList and not the element itself. Does anyone have any idea on how to store the arrayElements in the arrayList and not the value stored in them ??
Any alternate method is also welcome with the reasons why the method is better
Thanks in Advance
Your grid object is a two-dimensional integer array. grid[row][column+1] is an integer, located in the respective indexes in your grid.
adjacentSidesList.add(grid[row][column+1]);
will not work, because you want to add an int to a list of ArrayList of two-dimensional int arrays. I believe you want to store numbers and you want to know what are those numbers. I wonder about the definition of neighbor. I will suppose here that the neighbor is the element located up, down, left or right to the current element, or, to put it more scientifically, the elements being located exactly at a distance of 1 from the current element in Taxicab-geometry.
The first problem is that a point might be at the margin of your space, which would mean they do not have a neighbor. The next problem is a general formula for the neighbors. I believe your numbers should be aware of their position, therefore we should define the following class:
public class GridHandler {
private static GridHandler[][] grid;
private int i;
private int j;
private int value;
public static void init(int[][] input) {
int rowNumber = input.length;
int columnNumber = input[0].length;
grid = new GridHandler[rowNumber][columnNumber];
for (int r = 0; r < rowNumber; r++) {
for (c = 0; c < columnNumber; c++) {
grid[r][c] = new GridHandler(r, c, input[r][c]);
}
}
}
public static GridHandler[][] getGrid() {
return grid;
}
public GridHandler(int i, int j, int value) {
this.i = i;
this.j = j;
this.value = value;
grid[i][j] = this;
}
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(value) {
this.value = value;
}
public int getLeftValue() throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException {
if (j == 0) {
throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Left edge");
}
return grid[i][j - 1].getValue();
}
public int getUpValue() throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException {
if (i == 0) {
throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Up edge");
}
return grid[i - 1][j].getValue();
}
public int getRightValue() throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException {
if (j == grid[0].length - 1) {
throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Right edge");
}
return grid[i][j + 1].getValue();
}
public int getDownValue() throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException {
if (i == grid.length - 1) {
throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Down edge");
}
return grid[i + 1][j].getValue();
}
}
Now, if you use that class, each element will be aware of their neighbors. You can initialize the whole thing like this:
GridHandler.init(grid);
I hope this helps.
You could create a new class which will hold row and column index of 2D array element like:
class Index {
private int row;
private int column;
//getter and setters
}
Now when you want to store the data in list, you store the index object and when you have to access the element, you can access it like:
Index index = adjacentSidesList.get(0);
int element = grid[index.getRow()][index.getColumn()];
Every source I've looked at I either don't understand, doesn't seem to apply, or uses something like an Array list. I'm not familiar with those. So I'd like to use a basic toString method that prints out the index of the array as well as the number held when compared to the variable 'length' -- num.length could be different as that's the physical size of the underlying array. The for loop at the bottom has the gist of it. I'm trying to print out the index (0-infinite) with int's that are held in the resizeable array. The variable 'length' is not the actual size of the array but a working size that contains 0 until another cell is added. The 'strang' variable is just something I've tried. I don't think it will work, but anything else I doesn't seem to help as I'm stuck.
public class XArray
{
private int[] nums;
private int length;
public XArray()
{
nums = new int[10];
length = 0;
}
public void add(int value)
{
if (length == nums.length)
{
int[] nums2 = new int[(int)(nums.length * 1.2)];
for ( int i = length - 1; i >= 0; i-- )
{
nums2[i] = nums[i];
}
nums = nums2;
}
nums[length] = value;
length++;
}
public void set(int index, int value)
{
if (index < length)
{
nums[index] = value;
}
}
public int get(int index)
{
return nums[index];
}
public int size()
{
return length;
}
public void remove()
{
nums[length - 1] = 0;
length--;
}
public String toString(int[] nums)
{
String strang = "l";
for ( int i = 0 ; i < length; i++ )
{
strang = "Index: " + i + " Number: " + nums[i] + ", ";
}
return strang;
}
}
You need to concatenate the values on each iteration of the loop...something like...
public String toString(int[] nums)
{
StringBuilder strang = new StringBuilder(length);
for ( int i = 0 ; i < length; i++ )
{
strang.append("Index: ").append(i).append(" Number: ").append(nums[i]).append(", ");
}
return strang.toString();
}
Generally speaking, toString should't take parameters, there would a difference between nums and length which could cause issues
#Override
public String toString() {...
This way, you will be printing the contents of the objects num array, which is contextually associated with length
You probably meant to use += instead of = in that method (though many people will tell you to use a StringBuilder because successive concatenations, if not optimized by a compiler` will generate a lot of garbage).
Also, don't pass in nums! You want to use the field nums; passing in an argument will use the argument. The real toString has no parameters (and should have an #Override annotation).
Trying to use Arrays.binarySearch() to search for a string in an array and return the index. However each time I call Arrays.binarySearch() I get the following exception -
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.Arrays.binarySearch0(Unknown Source)
at java.util.Arrays.binarySearch(Unknown Source)
at project.ArrayDirectory.lookupNumber(ArrayDirectory.java:97)
at project.test.main(test.java:12)
Here is my ArrayDirectory class -
public class ArrayDirectory implements Directory {
static Entry[] directory = new Entry[50];
#Override
public void addEntry(String surname, String initials, int extension) {
int n = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < directory.length; i++) { // counting number of
// entries in array
if (directory[i] != null) {
n++;
}
}
if (n == directory.length) {
Entry[] temp = new Entry[directory.length * 2]; // if array is full
// double the
// length.
for (int i = 0; i < directory.length; i++)
temp[i] = directory[i];
directory = temp;
}
int position = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < directory.length; i++) {
position = i;
if (directory[i] != null) { // sorting the array into alphabetical
// order by surname.
int y = directory[i].getSurname().compareTo(surname);
if (y > 0) {
break;
}
}
else if (directory[i] == null) {
break;
}
}
System.arraycopy(directory, position, directory, position + 1,
directory.length - position - 1);
directory[position] = new Entry(initials, surname, extension); // placing
// new
// entry
// in
// correct
// position.
}
#Override
public int lookupNumber(String surname, String initials) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
Entry lookup = new Entry(surname, initials);
int index = Arrays.binarySearch(directory, lookup);
return index;
}
}
Any ideas how I use binary search to find the correct index?
Thank you for you help.
edit -
I have also overridden comapreToin my Entry class -
public int compareTo(Entry other) {
return this.surname.compareTo(other.getSurname());
}
In your invocation of
int index = Arrays.binarySearch(directory,lookup);
directory seems to contain only null elements. Check that you are initializing elements correctly.
I note two things:
static Entry [] directory = new Entry [1];
First, that code allocates space for one Entry in the array. It doesn't actually instantiate an Entry. That is, directory[0] is null. Secondly, a binary-search on an array with one entry is crazy. There is only one element. It must be directory[0]. Finally, you should sort your array to do a binary search on it.
The basic concept behind a binary search is the recursion of the following steps(Note the search assumes the list or array of elements is sorted in some form and the element exists there.):
Go to the middle element of the array.
check if the searched element is equal to the element at the middle. If it is then return its index.
if not then check if the searched element is 'smaller' or 'larger' than the element in the middle.
if it is smaller then go to step 1 using only the lower/first half of the array instead of the whole.
else go to step 1 using only the upper/last half of the array instead of the whole.
As the array is continuously divided in 2 it will eventually reach the size of 1 giving the result.
Now, suppose you are looking for an integer in an int array. Here is what the code would be like:
public static int binarySearch(int number, int[] array)
{
boolean isHere = false;
Integer index =0;
for(int i=0;i<array.length;i++)
{
if(array[i] == number)
{
isHere = true;
i = array.length;
}
}
if(!isHere)
{
index = -1;
}
else
{
int arrayStart = 0;
int arrayEnd = array.length;
index = binarySearch(number, arrayStart, arrayEnd, array);
}
return index;
}
private static int binarySearch(int number, int start, int end, int[] array)
{
// this formula ensures the index number will be preserved even if
// the array is divided later.
int middle = (start+ end)/ 2;
if(array[middle] == number)
{
return middle;
}
else
{
if(number < array[middle])
{
//searches the first half of the array
return binarySearch(number, start, middle, array);
}
else
{
// searches the last half of the array
return binarySearch(number, middle, end, array);
}
}
}
You can use the compareTo() method instead of <,>, & == operators in your example. The logic should still be the same.