Java rgb2 gray it's to dark - java

I don't can convert exactely my rgb image to an gray image..
My final image it's to dark, and affects my work.
I use this code:
public static BufferedImage rgb2gray(BufferedImage bi)//converter
{
int heightLimit = bi.getHeight();
int widthLimit = bi.getTileWidth();
BufferedImage converted = new BufferedImage(widthLimit, heightLimit, BufferedImage.TYPE_BYTE_GRAY);
for (int height = 0; height < heightLimit; height++) {
for (int width = 0; width < widthLimit; width++) {
Color c = new Color(bi.getRGB(width, height) & 0x00fffff);
int newRed = (int) ((0.2989f * c.getRed()) * 1.45);//0.2989f
int newGreen = (int) ((0.5870f * c.getGreen()) * 1.45);//0.5870f
int newBlue = (int) ((0.1140f * c.getBlue()) * 1.45);
int roOffset = newRed + newGreen + newBlue;
converted.setRGB(width, height, roOffset);
}
}
return converted;
}
What is wrong?
In matlab the result it's perfect, but with this code in java is poor.

I am not sure why this works in Matlab and not in java - except that perhaps color representation is not handled the same way in both platforms (but that's speculating). However, there is a very good way to do what you want to do - it doesn't answer your specific question ("what's wrong?"), but it should get you back to doing what you were hoping to do:
How do I desaturate a BufferedImage in Java?

Your mistake seems to be multiplying the new red, green and blue values with a mysterious 1.45.
Just remove that and make your code:
int newRed = (int) (0.2989f * c.getRed());
int newGreen = (int) (0.5870f * c.getGreen());
int newBlue = (int) (0.1140f * c.getBlue());
Matlab's documentation for it's rgb2gray function has these coefficients.

Related

Create simple 2D image preview from panoramic HDR

Is there some really simple and basic code for making preview for HDR images (like getting 2D BufferedImage output or something)?
I am using this HDR image.
I tried this (it uses TwelveMonkeys), but no success at all (it simply stuck/frozen at ImageReader reader = readers.next();)
I edited it a bit to suit my needs like this, testing where it got broken/stuck/frozen...and it always happen after TEST 1, that is TEST 2 is never reached, tho no IllegalArgumentException is thrown - if I remove the if() section, then TEST 3 is never reached (I am using NetBeansIDE v12.4, Win7 x64):
public BufferedImage hdrToBufferedImage(File hdrFile) throws IOException {
BufferedImage bi = null;
// Create input stream
// I WROTE DOWN THE STRING FOR THIS EXAMPLE, normally it is taken from the hdrFile
// HDR image size is 23.7MB if it matters at all?
ImageInputStream input = ImageIO.createImageInputStream(new File("Z:/HDR/spiaggia_di_mondello_4k.hdr"));
try {
// Get the reader
Iterator<ImageReader> readers = ImageIO.getImageReaders(input);
System.err.println("=====>>> TEST 1");
if (!readers.hasNext()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("No reader for: " + hdrFile);
}
System.err.println("=====>>> TEST 2");
ImageReader reader = readers.next();
System.err.println("=====>>> TEST 3");
try {
reader.setInput(input);
// Disable default tone mapping
HDRImageReadParam param = (HDRImageReadParam) reader.getDefaultReadParam();
param.setToneMapper(new NullToneMapper());
// Read the image, using settings from param
bi = reader.read(0, param);
} finally {
// Dispose reader in finally block to avoid memory leaks
reader.dispose();
}
} finally {
// Close stream in finally block to avoid resource leaks
input.close();
}
// Get float data
float[] rgb = ((DataBufferFloat) bi.getRaster().getDataBuffer()).getData();
// Convert the image to something easily displayable
BufferedImage converted = new ColorConvertOp(null).filter(bi, new BufferedImage(bi.getWidth(), bi.getHeight(), BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB));
return converted;
}
Well, if you don't mind occasional extreme halucinogenic oversaturation of some colors here and there (I was unable solving the issue - if anyone knows how to, please, feel free to update my code), you can try this (it is using JavaHDR) + I also added a bit of brightness and contrast to it as all HDR I tested looked too dark for the preview, so if you do not like that you can remove that part from the code:
public int rgbToInteger(int r, int g, int b) {
int rgb = r;
rgb = (rgb << 8) + g;
rgb = (rgb << 8) + b;
return rgb;
}
public BufferedImage hdrToBufferedImage(File hdrFile) throws IOException {
HDRImage hdr = HDREncoder.readHDR(hdrFile, true);
int width = hdr.getWidth();
int height = hdr.getHeight();
BufferedImage bi = new BufferedImage(width, height, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB);
for (int x = 0; x < width; x++) {
for (int y = 0; y < height; y++) {
int r = (int) (hdr.getPixelValue(x, y, 0) * 255);
int g = (int) (hdr.getPixelValue(x, y, 1) * 255);
int b = (int) (hdr.getPixelValue(x, y, 2) * 255);
bi.setRGB(x, y, rgbToInteger(r, g, b));
}
}
//***** YOU CAN REMOVE THIS SMALL SECTION IF YOU FEEL THE IMAGE IS TOO BRIGHT FOR YOU
float brightness = 2f;
float contrast = 20f;
RescaleOp rescaleOp = new RescaleOp(brightness, contrast, null);
rescaleOp.filter(bi, bi);
//*****
return bi;
}
I can compile and run the code you posted (changing the path obviously) without problems on my two macOS machines, testing on all the LTS Java versions (8, 11 and 17). In addition, I run code similar to this as part of the CI/CD pipeline of my project that tests on Windows and Linux as well. I think there is something wrong with the setup in your IDE or Java on your computer. I am not able to reproduce the "freeze"-situation you describe...
Here is the output of running the program (I also printed the resulting BufferedImage for verification):
=====>>> TEST 1
=====>>> TEST 2
=====>>> TEST 3
image = BufferedImage#5a42bbf4: type = 1 DirectColorModel: rmask=ff0000 gmask=ff00 bmask=ff amask=0 IntegerInterleavedRaster: width = 1024 height = 512 #Bands = 3 xOff = 0 yOff = 0 dataOffset[0] 0
Running with the code as-is (with the NullToneMapper and no post-processing), the image looks like this, due to unnormalized values:
Running with the default/built-in tone mapper, or simply reading the image with ImageIO.read(hdrFile) as suggested in the comments, the image will look like this:
Finally, playing a bit with the code using a custom global tone mapper; param.setToneMapper(new DefaultToneMapper(0.75f)), I get a result like this:
After a long discussion with #HaraldK and his code addition, I am posting the final correct code for this problem, that is in fact mix of #qraqatit code updated a bit with the #HaraldK addition that corrects wrong color tone mapping, here it is:
public int rgbToInteger(int r, int g, int b) {
int rgb = r;
rgb = (rgb << 8) + g;
rgb = (rgb << 8) + b;
return rgb;
}
public BufferedImage hdrToBufferedImage(File hdrFile) throws IOException {
HDRImage hdr = HDREncoder.readHDR(hdrFile, true);
int width = hdr.getWidth();
int height = hdr.getHeight();
BufferedImage bi = new BufferedImage(width, height, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB);
float colorToneCorrection = 0.75f;
for (int x = 0; x < width; x++) {
for (int y = 0; y < height; y++) {
float r = hdr.getPixelValue(x, y, 0);
int red = (int) ((r / (colorToneCorrection + r)) * 255);
float g = hdr.getPixelValue(x, y, 1);
int green = (int) ((g / (colorToneCorrection + g)) * 255);
float b = hdr.getPixelValue(x, y, 2);
int blue = (int) (int) ((b / (colorToneCorrection + b)) * 255);
bi.setRGB(x, y, rgbToInteger(red, green, blue));
}
}
//MAKE THE RESULTING IMAGE A BIT BRIGHTER
float brightness = 1.35f;
float contrast = 0f;
RescaleOp rescaleOp = new RescaleOp(brightness, contrast, null);
rescaleOp.filter(bi, bi);
return bi;
}

glReadPixels returns more data than expected

I want to save a video of what I am showing with openGL using JOGL. To do this, I am writing my frames to pictures as follows and then, once I have saved all frames I'll use ffmpeg. I know that this is not the best approach but I still don't have much clear how to accelerate with tex2dimage and PBOs. Any help in that direction would be very useful.
Anyway, my problem is that if I run the opengl class it works but, if I call this class from another class, then I see that the glReadPixels is trhowing me an error. It always returns more data to buffer than memory has been allocated to my buffer "pixelsRGB". Does anyone know why?
As an example: width = 1042; height=998. Allocated=3.119.748 glPixels returned=3.121.742
public void display(GLAutoDrawable drawable) {
//Draw things.....
//bla bla bla
t++; //This is a time variable for the animation (it says to me the frame).
//Save frame
int width = drawable.getSurfaceWidth();
int height = drawable.getSurfaceHeight();
ByteBuffer pixelsRGB = Buffers.newDirectByteBuffer(width * height * 3);
gl.glReadPixels(0, 0, width,height, gl.GL_RGB, gl.GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, pixelsRGB);
BufferedImage bufferedImage = new BufferedImage(width, height, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB);
int[] pixels = new int[width * height];
int firstByte = width * height * 3;
int sourceIndex;
int targetIndex = 0;
int rowBytesNumber = width * 3;
for (int row = 0; row < height; row++) {
firstByte -= rowBytesNumber;
sourceIndex = firstByte;
for (int col = 0; col < width; col++) {
int iR = pixelsRGB.get(sourceIndex++);
int iG = pixelsRGB.get(sourceIndex++);
int iB = pixelsRGB.get(sourceIndex++);
pixels[targetIndex++] = 0xFF000000
| ((iR & 0x000000FF) << 16)
| ((iG & 0x000000FF) << 8)
| (iB & 0x000000FF);
}
}
bufferedImage.setRGB(0, 0, width, height, pixels, 0, width);
File a = new File(t+".png");
ImageIO.write(bufferedImage, "PNG", a);
}
NOTE: With pleluron's answer now it works. The good code is:
public void display(GLAutoDrawable drawable) {
//Draw things.....
//bla bla bla
t++; //This is a time variable for the animation (it says to me the frame).
//Save frame
int width = drawable.getSurfaceWidth();
int height = drawable.getSurfaceHeight();
ByteBuffer pixelsRGB = Buffers.newDirectByteBuffer(width * height * 4);
gl.glReadPixels(0, 0, width,height, gl.GL_RGBA, gl.GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, pixelsRGB);
BufferedImage bufferedImage = new BufferedImage(width, height, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB);
int[] pixels = new int[width * height];
int firstByte = width * height * 4;
int sourceIndex;
int targetIndex = 0;
int rowBytesNumber = width * 4;
for (int row = 0; row < height; row++) {
firstByte -= rowBytesNumber;
sourceIndex = firstByte;
for (int col = 0; col < width; col++) {
int iR = pixelsRGB.get(sourceIndex++);
int iG = pixelsRGB.get(sourceIndex++);
int iB = pixelsRGB.get(sourceIndex++);
sourceIndex++;
pixels[targetIndex++] = 0xFF000000
| ((iR & 0x000000FF) << 16)
| ((iG & 0x000000FF) << 8)
| (iB & 0x000000FF);
}
}
bufferedImage.setRGB(0, 0, width, height, pixels, 0, width);
File a = new File(t+".png");
ImageIO.write(bufferedImage, "PNG", a);
}
The default value of GL_PACK_ALIGNMENT set with glPixelStore is 4. It means that each row of pixelsRGB should start at an address that is a multiple of 4, and the width of your buffer (1042) times the number of bytes in a pixel (3) isn't a multiple of 4. Adding a little padding so the next row starts at a multiple of 4 will make the total byte size of your buffer larger than what you expected.
To fix it, set GL_PACK_ALIGNMENT to 1. You could also read the pixels with GL_RGBA and use a larger buffer, since the data is most likely to be stored that way both on the GPU and in BufferedImage.
Edit: BufferedImage doesn't have a convenient 'setRGBA', too bad.

Converting grayscale image pixels to defined scale

I'm looking to use a very crude heightmap I've created in Photoshop to define a tiled isometric grid for me:
Map:
http://i.imgur.com/jKM7AgI.png
I'm aiming to loop through every pixel in the image and convert the colour of that pixel to a scale of my choosing, for example 0-100.
At the moment I'm using the following code:
try
{
final File file = new File("D:\\clouds.png");
final BufferedImage image = ImageIO.read(file);
for (int x = 0; x < image.getWidth(); x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < image.getHeight(); y++)
{
int clr = image.getRGB(x, y) / 99999;
if (clr <= 0)
clr = -clr;
System.out.println(clr);
}
}
}
catch (IOException ex)
{
// Deal with exception
}
This works to an extent; the black pixel at position 0 is 167 and the white pixel at position 999 is 0. However when I insert certain pixels into the image I get slightly odd results, for example a gray pixel that's very close to white returns over 100 when I would expect it to be in single digits.
Is there an alternate solution I could use that would yield more reliable results?
Many thanks.
Since it's a grayscale map, the RGB parts will all be the same value (with range 0 - 255), so just take one out of the packed integer and find out what percent of 255 it is:
int clr = (int) ((image.getRGB(x, y) & 0xFF) / 255.0 * 100);
System.out.println(clr);
getRGB returns all channels packed into one int so you shouldn't do arithmetic with it. Maybe use the norm of the RGB-vector instead?
for (int x = 0; x < image.getWidth(); ++x) {
for (int y = 0; y < image.getHeight(); ++y) {
final int rgb = image.getRGB(x, y);
final int red = ((rgb & 0xFF0000) >> 16);
final int green = ((rgb & 0x00FF00) >> 8);
final int blue = ((rgb & 0x0000FF) >> 0);
// Norm of RGB vector mapped to the unit interval.
final double intensity =
Math.sqrt(red * red + green * green + blue * blue)
/ Math.sqrt(3 * 255 * 255);
}
}
Note that there is also the java.awt.Color class that can be instantiated with the int returned by getRGB and provides getRed, getGreen and getBlue methods if you don't want to do the bit manipulations yourself.

Strange wraping when rotating Bitmaps

I started developing a custom Image class for a game which consists of three basic fields, width, height and a unidimensional array of int's which represent the color in the following order ARGB.
About two days ago i started trying to rotate images, and i was able to do that by converting this to a BufferedImage, rotate using Graphics2D and transforming it back to my own Image class, however setRGB and getRGB seem to be too slow and when i have to rotate about 10-20 images of 64*64 pixels the computer starts to struggle to maintain the fps.
So naturally i started developing my own image rotation function and i found a great post on gamedev.stackexchange.
https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/67613/how-can-i-rotate-a-bitmap-without-d3d-or-opengl
The answer explains clearly what i should do to rotate an image even with different rotation points (which i intend to implement later).
However when following a similar formula to the one he explained (I had to change due to using a different coordinate system)
i find myself getting a strange wrapping at the top
Example (55 degrees): http://i.imgur.com/BBq83wV.png (The Black area represents the image size)
So i tried to distanciate the image from the top, and added
yDstPixel += this.height*sin;
Which sorta worked, but now the image gets clipped in half instead of wrapped
Example (35 degrees):http://i.imgur.com/Ap4aqrn.png
I'm almost sure the solution is very simple, but i cant seem to figure it out, a nudge in the right direction would be appreciated.
public Bitmap getRotatedCopy(double radians){
if(radians==0 || radians==(2*Math.PI)) return this;
double sin = Math.abs(Math.sin(radians));
double cos = Math.abs(Math.cos(radians));
int newWidth = (int) (this.width * cos + this.height * sin);
int newHeight = (int) (this.width * sin + this.height * cos);
Bitmap returnMap = new Bitmap(newWidth,newHeight); //set size of the returned bitmap to the smallest size possible
returnMap.fill(0xFF000000);
for (int y = 0; y < this.height; y++){
for(int x = 0; x < this.width; x++){
int srcPixel = x + (y * this.width);
int color= this.pixels[srcPixel];
if(color>0) continue;
int xDstPixel = (int) Math.abs((x * cos + y * sin));
int yDstPixel = (int) Math.abs((x * sin - y * cos));
//yDstPixel += this.height*sin;
int dstPixel = xDstPixel + (yDstPixel * newWidth);
returnMap.pixels[dstPixel]=color;
}
}
return returnMap;
}
You'll need to implement what you were planning to do later i.e. set the rotation origin and translation after the rotation.
I have modified your code to add them. (I didn't test running it but hope it works.) Please refer to the code below:
int newWidth = (int) (this.width * cos + this.height * sin);
int newHeight = (int) (this.width * sin + this.height * cos);
// After setting the new width and height...
// set rotation origin
double rox = this.width/2;
double roy = this.height/2;
// set translation center
double tcx = newWidth/2;
double tcy = newHeight/2;
Bitmap returnMap = new Bitmap(newWidth,newHeight);
returnMap.fill(0xFF000000);
for (int y = 0; y < this.height; y++){
double yy = y - roy;
for(int x = 0; x < this.width; x++){
double xx = x - rox;
int srcPixel = x + (y * this.width);
int color= this.pixels[srcPixel];
if(color>0) continue;
// following two lines are modified
int xDstPixel = (int) (xx * cos + yy * sin) + tcx;
int yDstPixel = (int) (xx * sin - yy * cos) + tcy;
// prevent negative index : maybe it is not needed at all
if (xDstPixel<0 || yDstPixel<0)
continue;
int dstPixel = xDstPixel + (yDstPixel * newWidth);
returnMap.pixels[dstPixel]=color;
}
}

Implementing Matlab's rgb2gray in Java

I'm trying to implement Matlab's rgb2gray in Java according to http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/images/ref/rgb2gray.html . I have the following code:
public BufferedImage convert(BufferedImage bi){
int heightLimit = bi.getHeight();
int widthLimit = bi.getWidth();
BufferedImage converted = new BufferedImage(widthLimit, heightLimit,
BufferedImage.TYPE_BYTE_GRAY);
for(int height = 0; height < heightLimit; height++){
for(int width = 0; width < widthLimit; width++){
// Remove the alpha component
Color c = new Color(bi.getRGB(width, height) & 0x00ffffff);
// Normalize
int newRed = (int) 0.2989f * c.getRed();
int newGreen = (int) 0.5870f * c.getGreen();
int newBlue = (int) 0.1140f * c.getBlue();
int roOffset = newRed + newGreen + newBlue;
converted.setRGB(width, height, roOffset);
}
}
return converted;
}
Now, I do get a grayscale image but it is too dark compared to what I get from Matlab. AFAIK, the easiest way to turn an image to grayscale is have a BufferedImage of type TYPE_BYTE_GRAY and then just copy the pixels of a BufferedImage of TYPE_INT_(A)RGB. But even this method gives an image that is darker than Matlab's though grayscale decently enough. I've also looked into using RescaleOp. However, I don't find anyway in RescaleOp to set the grayness per pixel.
As an added test, I print out the image matrices produced by Java nad by Matlab. In Java, I get figures like 6316128 6250335 6118749 6118749 6250335 6447714 while in Matlab, I only get something like 116 117 119 120 119 115 (first six figures of both matrices).
How do I get an output similar to Matlab's?
The operator precedence in Java specifies that type-casting is higher than multiplication. You're casting your floating-point constants to 0, so I don't understand how you're getting a grayscale result at all. Easy to fix:
int newRed = (int) (0.2989f * c.getRed());
int newGreen = (int) (0.5870f * c.getGreen());
int newBlue = (int) (0.1140f * c.getBlue());
I would also replace 0.2989 with 0.2990 as it appears to be a typo in the documentation.

Categories